No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Toward a more domain-specific conceptualization of female traits: A commentary on Benenson et al. (2022)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 July 2022
Abstract
Benenson et al. (2022) amass impressive evidence of robust sex differences as support for expanding “staying alive” theory. We argue for a broader and more domain-specific conceptualization focusing on life history tradeoffs between survival and mating success. Using three examples – women's disgust, fear of rape, and cultivation of bodyguards – we illustrate these tradeoffs and suggest a broader theoretical framework.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Al-Shawaf, L., Lewis, D. M., & Buss, D. M. (2018). Sex differences in disgust: Why are women more easily disgusted than men?. Emotion Review, 10(2), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benenson, J. F., Webb, C. E., & Wrangham, R. W. (2022). Self-protection as an adaptive female strategy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21002417.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2017). Sexual conflict theory in human mating. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 307–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2021). When men behave badly: The hidden roots of sexual deception, harassment, and assault. Little, Brown Spark.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crosby, C. L., Durkee, P. K., Meston, C. M., & Buss, D. M. (2020). Six dimensions of sexual disgust. Personality and Individual Differences, 156, 109714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskelyte, J., & Lyons, M. (2022). Fear of crime and preference for aggressive-formidable same-sex and opposite-sex friends. Current Psychology, 41(3), 1434–1439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00679-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, D. (2009). Pre- and post-copulatory mate choice in Platygryllus primiformis: Cryptic female choice and sexual conflict. Bioscience Horizons, 2(2), 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perilloux, C., Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2012). The costs of rape. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(5), 1099–1106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pryor, D. W., & Hughes, M. R. (2013). Fear of rape among college women: A social psychological analysis, Violence and Victims, 28(3), 443–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, J. K., Fessler, D. M. T., Tiokhin, L., Frederick, D. A., Lee, S. W., & Navarrete, C. D. (2011). Trade-offs in a dangerous world: Women’s fear of crime predicts preferences for aggressive and formidable mates. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., & Griskevicius, V. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warr, M. (1985). Fear of rape among urban women. Social Problems, 32(2), 238–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Self-protection as an adaptive female strategy
Related commentaries (22)
An expanded “staying alive” theory (SAT) underplays complexity in Homo sapiens
Beyond individual sex differences: “Staying alive theory” as an adaptive complex
Biological sex, by-products, and other continuous variables
Female advantage in threat avoidance manifests in threat reaction but not threat detection
Harm or protection? Two-sided consequences of females' susceptible responses to multiple threats
Only as a last resort: Sociocultural differences between women and men explain women's heightened reaction to threat, not evolutionary principles
Pathological complexity and the evolution of sex differences
Psychological and behavioral implications of self-protection and self-enhancement
Sex differences are insufficient evidence of ecological adaptations in human females
Sex differences in longevity are relative, not independent
Sex-dependent selection, ageing, and implications for “staying alive”
Societies also prioritize female survival
Somatic maintenance/reproduction tradeoffs and human evolution
Staying alive enhances both women's and men's fitness
Staying alive includes adaptations for catalyzing cooperation
The pregnancy compensation hypothesis, not the staying alive theory, accounts for disparate autoimmune functioning of women around the world
The “staying alive” theory reinforces stereotypes and shows women's lower quality of life
Toward a more domain-specific conceptualization of female traits: A commentary on Benenson et al. (2022)
Women amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Self-protection through the behavioral immune system
Women need to stay alive and protect reproductive choice
Women take risks to help others to stay alive
“Staying alive” in the context of intimate partner abuse
Author response
Females undergo selection too