Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:37:35.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On believing that time does not flow, but thinking that it seems to

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2019

Kristie Miller Open the ORCID record for Kristie Miller [Opens in a new window] ,
Alex O. Holcombe  and
Andrew J. Latham
Kristie Miller
Affiliation:
The Centre for Time and Department of Philosophy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW2006, [email protected]@sydney.edu.auhttps://sydney.edu.au/arts/philosophy/staff/profiles/kristie.miller.php https://philpeople.org/profiles/andrew-james-latham
Alex O. Holcombe
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW2006, Australia. [email protected]://sydney.edu.au/science/people/alex.holcombe.php
Andrew J. Latham
Affiliation:
The Centre for Time and Department of Philosophy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW2006, [email protected]@sydney.edu.auhttps://sydney.edu.au/arts/philosophy/staff/profiles/kristie.miller.php https://philpeople.org/profiles/andrew-james-latham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hoerl & McCormack (H&M) posit two systems – the temporal updating system and the temporal reasoning system – and suggest that they explain an inherent contradiction in people's naïve theory of time. We suggest there is no contradiction. Something does, however, require explanation: the tension between certain sophisticated beliefs about time, and certain phenomenological states or beliefs about those phenomenological states. The temporal updating mechanism posited by H&M may contribute to this tension.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 42 , 2019 , e265
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bardon, A. (2013) A brief history of the philosophy of time. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199976454.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddon-Mitchell, D. (2013) Against the illusion theory of temporal phenomenology. In: CAPE studies in Applied Ethics, vol. 2, pp. 211–33.Google Scholar
Callender, C. (2008) The common now. Philosophical Issues 18(1):339–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callender, C. (2017) What makes time special? Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198797302.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, R. (1963) Intellectual autobiography. In: The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, ed. Schilpp, P. A., pp. 3–84. Open Court.Google Scholar
Dainton, B. (2011) Time, passage, and immediate experience. In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time, ed. Callender, Craig, pp. 382–419. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deng, N. (2017) Making sense of the growing block view. Philosophia 45(3):1113–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartle, J. B. (2005) The physics of now. American Journal of Physics 73(2):101. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1783900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoerl, C. (2014a) Do we (seem to) perceive passage? Philosophical Explorations 17:188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohwy, J., Paton, B., Palmer, C. (2015) Distrusting the Present. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15(3):315–35. doi:10.1007/s11097-015-9439-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismael, J. (2012) Decision and the open future. In The Future of the Philosophy of Time, ed. Bardon, A., pp. 149–69. Routledge.Google Scholar
Le Poidevin, R. (2007) The images of time: An essay on temporal representation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K., Holcombe, A. & Latham, A. J. (2018) Temporal phenomenology: Phenomenal illusion vs cognitive error. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1730-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, L. A. (2010) Temporal experience. Journal of Philosophy 107:333–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, S. (2006) Temporal metaphysics in Z-land. Synthese 149(1):77–96. doi:10.1007/s11229-004-6249-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, S. (2012) Why does time seem to pass? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85(1):92–116. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00445.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar