No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Harm or protection? Two-sided consequences of females' susceptible responses to multiple threats
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 July 2022
Abstract
The target article presented a plausible argument that females' susceptibility to threats might be self-protection for staying alive, but some evidence requires scrutiny. We need to consider (1) the biases of narrative reviews, (2) subjective life quality, and (3) the shadow side of extreme reactions to threats before concluding that females' threat-based response is a self-protection mechanism that promotes survival.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Becker, D. V., & Srinivasan, N. (2014). The vividness of the happy face. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 189–194. doi: 10.1177/0963721414533702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benenson, J. F., Webb, C. E., & Wrangham, R. W. (2021). Self-protection as an adaptive female strategy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–86. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X21002417CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(2), 203–214. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99001818CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuijpers, P., Franco, P., Ciharova, M., Miguel, C., Segre, L., Quero, S., & Karyotaki, E. (2021). Psychological treatment of perinatal depression: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 1–13. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721004529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, M. (2008). Influences of gender ideology and housework allocation on women's employment over the life course. Social Science Research, 37(1), 254–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.01.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drury, S. S., Scaramella, L., & Zeanah, C. H. (2016). The neurobiological impact of postpartum maternal depression: Prevention and intervention approaches. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 25(2), 179–200. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2015.11.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gangestad, S. W., & Scheyd, G. J. (2005). The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34(1), 523–548. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C., & van Anders, S. M. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. The American Psychologist, 74(2), 171–193. doi: 10.1037/amp0000307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iacovides, S., Avidon, I., Bentley, A., & Baker, F. C. (2014). Reduced quality of life when experiencing menstrual pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 93(2), 213–217. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12287CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kontis, V., Bennett, J. E., Mathers, C. D., Li, G., Foreman, K., & Ezzati, M. (2017). Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: Projections with a Bayesian model ensemble. Lancet (London, England), 389(10076), 1323–1335. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32381-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, H., Yuan, J., & Lin, C. (2008). The neural mechanism underlying the female advantage in identifying negative emotions: An event-related potential study. NeuroImage, 40(4), 1921–1929. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, J., Zou, L., Lin, W., Becker, B., Yeung, A., Cuijpers, P., & Li, H. (2021). Does gender role explain a high risk of depression? A meta-analytic review of 40 years of evidence. Journal of Affective Disorders, 294, 261–278. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luthar, S. S., & Ciciolla, L. (2015). Who mothers mommy? Factors that contribute to mothers’ well-being. Developmental Psychology, 51(12), 1812–1823. doi: 10.1037/dev0000051CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgenroth, T., & Ryan, M. K. (2021). The effects of gender trouble: An integrative theoretical framework of the perpetuation and disruption of the gender/sex binary. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1113–1142. doi: 10.1177/1745691620902442CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OECD (2013). Gender differences in well-being: Can women and men have it all? Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/component/how_life-2013-8-enGoogle Scholar
Robine, J. M., Michel, J. P., & Branch, L. G. (1992). Measurement and utilization of healthy life expectancy: Conceptual issues. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 70(6), 791–800. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1486677Google ScholarPubMed
Salomon, J. A., Mathers, C. D., Murray, C. J., & Ferguson, B. (2001). Methods for life expectancy and healthy life expectancy uncertainty analysis.Google Scholar
Slomian, J., Honvo, G., Emonts, P., Reginster, J.-Y., & Bruyère, O. (2019). Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes. Women's Health (London, England), 15, 1745506519844044. doi: 10.1177/1745506519844044CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, Z. E., & Conger, R. D. (2017). Promoting strengths and resilience in single-mother families. Child Development, 88(2), 350–358. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12741CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Totsika, V., Hastings, R. P., Emerson, E., Lancaster, G. A., Berridge, D. M., & Vagenas, D. (2013). Is there a bidirectional relationship between maternal well-being and child behavior problems in autism spectrum disorders? Longitudinal analysis of a population-defined sample of young children. Autism Research, 6(3), 201–211. doi: 10.1002/aur.1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woody, C. A., Ferrari, A. J., Siskind, D. J., Whiteford, H. A., & Harris, M. G. (2017). A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 219, 86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuan, J., Luo, Y., Yan, J. H., Meng, X., Yu, F. (2009). Neural correlates of the females' susceptibility to negative emotions: An insight into gender-related prevalence of affective disturbances. Human Brain Mapping, 30(11), 3676–3686. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20796CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Self-protection as an adaptive female strategy
Related commentaries (22)
An expanded “staying alive” theory (SAT) underplays complexity in Homo sapiens
Beyond individual sex differences: “Staying alive theory” as an adaptive complex
Biological sex, by-products, and other continuous variables
Female advantage in threat avoidance manifests in threat reaction but not threat detection
Harm or protection? Two-sided consequences of females' susceptible responses to multiple threats
Only as a last resort: Sociocultural differences between women and men explain women's heightened reaction to threat, not evolutionary principles
Pathological complexity and the evolution of sex differences
Psychological and behavioral implications of self-protection and self-enhancement
Sex differences are insufficient evidence of ecological adaptations in human females
Sex differences in longevity are relative, not independent
Sex-dependent selection, ageing, and implications for “staying alive”
Societies also prioritize female survival
Somatic maintenance/reproduction tradeoffs and human evolution
Staying alive enhances both women's and men's fitness
Staying alive includes adaptations for catalyzing cooperation
The pregnancy compensation hypothesis, not the staying alive theory, accounts for disparate autoimmune functioning of women around the world
The “staying alive” theory reinforces stereotypes and shows women's lower quality of life
Toward a more domain-specific conceptualization of female traits: A commentary on Benenson et al. (2022)
Women amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Self-protection through the behavioral immune system
Women need to stay alive and protect reproductive choice
Women take risks to help others to stay alive
“Staying alive” in the context of intimate partner abuse
Author response
Females undergo selection too