Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:42:22.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluency: A trigger of familiarity for relational representations?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2020

Talya Sadeh*
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience & Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, POB 653, Beer Sheva8410501, Israel. [email protected]://bgu.ac.il/~tsadeh/index.php

Abstract

According to Bastin et al.’s integrative memory model, familiarity may be attributed to both entity representations and relational representations. However, the model does not specify what triggers familiarity for relational representations. I argue that fluency is a key player in the attribution of familiarity regardless of the type of representation. Two lines of evidence are reviewed in support of my claim.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N. & Eyre, R. N. (2007) Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(4):569–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M. & Vaughan, E. B. (2011) Fortune favors the Bold (and the Italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition 118(1):111–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, K., Ketz, N., Inati, S. J. & Davachi, L. (2012) Evidence for area CA1 as a match/mismatch detector: A high-resolution fMRI study of the human hippocampus. Hippocampus 22(3):389–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, J. C. (2004) Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review 111(2):524–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düzel, E., Habib, R., Rotte, M., Guderian, S., Tulving, E. & Heinze, H.-J. (2003) Human hippocampal and parahippocampal activity during visual associative recognition memory for spatial and nonspatial stimulus configurations. Journal of Neuroscience 23(28):9439–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T. & Cohen, N. J. (1994) Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17(3):449–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakesch, M., Leder, H. & Forster, M. (2013) Image ambiguity and fluency. PLOS ONE 8(9):e74084. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleider, H. M. & Goldinger, S. D. (2004) Illusions of face memory: Clarity breeds familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language 50(2):196211. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.09.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumaran, D. & Maguire, E. A. (2006) An unexpected sequence of events: Mismatch detection in the human hippocampus. PLOS Biology 4(12):e424. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumaran, D. & Maguire, E. A. (2007) Match–mismatch processes underlie human hippocampal responses to associative novelty. Journal of Neuroscience 27(32):8517–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumaran, D. & Maguire, E. A. (2009) Novelty signals: A window into hippocampal information processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(2):4754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laham, S. M., Alter, A. L. & Goodwin, G. P. (2009) Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer: Discrepantly fluent violations are deemed less morally wrong. Cognition 112(3):462–66. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lev-Ari, S. & Keysar, B. (2010) Why don't we believe non-native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46(6):1093–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paynter, C. A., Reder, L. M. & Kieffaber, P. D. (2009) Knowing we know before we know: ERP correlates of initial feeling-of-knowing. Neuropsychologia 47(3):796803. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reder, L. M. & Ritter, F. E. (1992) What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18(3):435–51. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.3.435.Google Scholar
Song, H. & Schwarz, N. (2008a) Fluency and the detection of misleading questions: Low processing fluency attenuates the Moses illusion. Social Cognition 26(6):791–99. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.6.791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, H. & Schwarz, N. (2008b) If it's hard to read, it's hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science 19(10):986–88. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, E. J., Chun, M. M. & Kuhl, B. A. (2013) Repetition suppression and multi-voxel pattern similarity differentially track implicit and explicit visual memory. Journal of Neuroscience 33(37):14749–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittlesea, B. W. A., Jacoby, L. L. & Girard, K. (1990) Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language 29(6):716–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(90)90045-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittlesea, B. W. A. & Leboe, J. P. (2000) The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: Fluency, generation, and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129(1):84106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wixted, J. T. (2007) Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review 114(1):152–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wixted, J. T. & Mickes, L. (2010) A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Psychological Review 117(4):1025–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002) The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 46(3):441517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar