No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Are we all implicit puritans? New evidence that work and sex are intuitively moralized in both traditional and non-traditional cultures
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 October 2023
Abstract
Contradicting our earlier claims of American moral exceptionalism, recent self-replication evidence from our laboratory indicates that implicit puritanism characterizes the judgments of people across cultures. Implicit cultural evolution may lag behind explicit change, such that differences between traditional and non-traditional cultures are greater at a deliberative than an intuitive level. Not too deep down, perhaps we are all implicit puritans.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In Wyer, R. S. Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition, Vol. 10. The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1–61). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Celniker, J. B., Gregory, A., Koo, H. J., Piff, P. K., Ditto, P. H., & Shariff, A. F. (2023). The moralization of effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001259CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlesworth, T. E., & Banaji, M. R. (2022). Patterns of implicit and explicit stereotypes III: Long-term change in gender stereotypes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, T. E., Yang, V., Mann, T. C., Kurdi, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2021). Gender stereotypes in natural language: Word embeddings show robust consistency across child and adult language corpora of more than 65 million words. Psychological Science, 32(2), 218–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, S., Lipson, A., Holstein, C., & Huh, E. (1992). Irrational reactions to negative outcomes: Evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Chapter 2: Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 55–130). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(61–83), 111–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landes, D. S. (1998). The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor. Norton.Google Scholar
Landy, J. F., Jia, M., Ding, I. L., Viganola, D., Tierney, W., Dreber, A., … Uhlmann, E. L. (2020). Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results. Psychological Bulletin, 146, 451–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, L., Simmons, J., & Simonsohn, U. (2018). Psychology's renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 511–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poehlman, T. A. (2007). Ideological inheritance: Implicit puritanism in American moral cognition. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tierney, W., Hardy, J. H. III, Ebersole, C. R., Leavitt, K., Viganola, D., Clemente, E., … Uhlmann, E. (2020). Creative destruction in science. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 161, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, W., Hardy, J. H. III, Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., … Uhlmann, E. L. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, 104060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L. (2012). American psychological isolationism. Review of General Psychology, 16, 381–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., Poehlman, T. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Implicit theism. In Sorrentino, R. & Yamaguchi, S. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures (pp. 71–94). Elsevier/Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., Poehlman, T. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). American moral exceptionalism. In Jost, J. T., Kay, A. C., & Thorisdottir, H. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 27–52). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., Poehlman, T. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Bargh, J. A. (2011). Implicit puritanism in American moral cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 312–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Target article
Moral disciplining: The cognitive and evolutionary foundations of puritanical morality
Related commentaries (28)
A broader theory of cooperation can better explain “purity”
Are we all implicit puritans? New evidence that work and sex are intuitively moralized in both traditional and non-traditional cultures
Considering the role of self-interest in moral disciplining
Disciplining the disciplined: Making sense of the gender gap that lies at the core of puritanical morals
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: Indulging in harmless pleasures can support self-regulation and foster cooperation
Drinking and feasting are perceived as facilitating cooperation
Evolutionary research confirms that a need for collective action increases puritanism
Is undisciplined behavior antithetical to cooperation, or is it part and parcel of it?
Little puritans?
Moral artificial intelligence and machine puritanism
Moral disciplining provides a satisfying explanation for Chinese lay concepts of immorality
Moral emotions underlie puritanical morality
Moralistic punishment is not for cooperation
On cooperative libertines and wicked puritans
Puritanical moral rules as moral heuristics coping with uncertainties
Puritanical moralism may signal patience rather than cause self-control
Puritanical morality and the scaffolded evolution of self-control
Puritanical morality: Cooperation or coercion?
Puritanism as moral advertisement helps solve the puzzle of ineffective moralization
Puritanism needs purity, and moral psychology needs pluralism
Purity is linked to cooperation but not necessarily through self-control
Purity is not a distinct moral domain
Purity is still a problem
Signals of discipline and puritanical challenges to liberty
The evolution of puritanical morality has not always served to strengthen cooperation, but to reinforce male dominance and exclude women
The many faces of moralized self-control: Puritanical morality is not reducible to cooperation concerns
There are no beautiful surfaces without a terrible depth
“WEIRD” societies still value (even needless) self-control and self-sacrifice
Author response
The puritanical moral contract: Purity, cooperation, and the architecture of the moral mind