Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:05:39.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anti-fat discrimination in marriage more clearly explains the poverty–obesity paradox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Daniel J. Hruschka  and
Seung-Yong Han
Daniel J. Hruschka
Affiliation:
School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402. [email protected]@gmail.com
Seung-Yong Han
Affiliation:
School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402. [email protected]@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The target article proposes the insurance hypothesis as an explanation for higher levels of obesity among food-insecure women living in high-income countries. An alternative hypothesis based on anti-fat discrimination in marriage can also account for such correlations between poverty and obesity and is more consistent with finer-grained analyses by marital status, gender, and age.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e120
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Han, S.-Y. & Hruschka, D. J. (submitted) Deprivation or discrimination? Comparing two theories of the reverse gradient in the U.S. and Korea. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. Google Scholar
Hanson, K. L., Sobal, J. & Frongillo, E. A. (2007) Gender and marital status clarify associations between food insecurity and body weight. Journal of Nutrition 137(6):1460–65.Google Scholar
Hruschka, D. J. (2012) Do economic constraints on food choice make people fat? A critical review of two hypotheses for the poverty–obesity paradox. American Journal of Human Biology 24(3):277–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hruschka, D. J. (2017) From thin to fat and back again: A dual process model of the big body mass reversal. In: Fat planet, ed. Anderson-Fye, E. & Brewis, A., pp. 15–32. University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Hruschka, D. J. & Hadley, C. (2016) How much do universal anthropometric standards bias the global monitoring of obesity and undernutrition? Obesity Reviews 17(1):1030–103. doi: 10.1111/obr.12449.Google Scholar
Hruschka, D. J., Hadley, C. & Brewis, A. (2014) Disentangling basal and accumulated body mass for cross-population comparisons. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 153(4):542–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oreffice, S. & Quintana-Domeque, C. (2010) Anthropometry and socioeconomics among couples: Evidence in the United States. Economics & Human Biology 8(3):373–84.Google Scholar