Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:22:13.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An action-specific effect on perception that avoids all pitfalls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Jessica K. Witt ,
Mila Sugovic ,
Nathan L. Tenhundfeld  and
Zachary R. King
Jessica K. Witt
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, College of Natural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523; [email protected]@[email protected]://amplab.colostate.edu
Mila Sugovic
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. [email protected]
Nathan L. Tenhundfeld
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, College of Natural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523; [email protected]@[email protected]://amplab.colostate.edu
Zachary R. King
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, College of Natural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523; [email protected]@[email protected]://amplab.colostate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The visual system is influenced by action. Objects that are easier to reach or catch look closer and slower, respectively. Here, we describe evidence for one action-specific effect, and show that none of the six pitfalls can account for the results. Vision is not an isolate module, as shown by this top-down effect of action on perception.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e261
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gibson, J. J. (1979) The ecological approach to perception and action. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Philbeck, J. W. & Witt, J. K. (2015) Action-specific influences on perception and post-perceptual processes: Present controversies and future directions. Psychological Bulletin 141(6):1120–44. doi:10.1037/a0039738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verducci, T. (2000) The power of Pedro. Sports Illustrated [vol(issue)]:, 54–62. Available at: http://www.si.com/mlb/2015/07/23/pedro-martinez-hall-of-fame-boston-red-sox-tom-verducci, May 18, 2016, 54–62.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K. & Sugovic, M. (2010) Performance and ease influence perceived speed. Perception 39(10):1341–53. doi:10.1068/P6699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, J. K. & Sugovic, M. (2012) Does ease to block a ball affect perceived ball speed? Examination of alternative hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38(5):1202–14. doi:10.1037/a0026512.Google Scholar
Witt, J. K. & Sugovic, M. (2013a) Catching ease influences perceived speed: Evidence for action-specific effects from action-based measures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 20:1364–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, J. K. & Sugovic, M. (2013b) Response bias cannot explain action-specific effects: Evidence from compliant and non-compliant participants. Perception 42:138–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, J. K., Sugovic, M. & Dodd, M. D. (2016) Action-specific perception of speed is independent of attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 78(3):880–90. doi:10.3758/s13414-015-1047-6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, J. K., Sugovic, M. & Taylor, J. E. T. (2012) Action-specific effects in a social context: Others' abilities influence perceived speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38(3):715–25. doi:10.1037/a0026261.Google Scholar