We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The main thesis of this chapter is that in fighting a crisis, policymakers often sow the seeds for the next crisis. There are three sections in this chapter. Section 1 argues that COVID-19 made its appearance on an unstable financial stage and exposed the fractures and flaws of the present financial system, which we term as financialized capitalism. We briefly show how this system evolved historically, the defining features of financialized capitalism, and how it led to the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC). Section 2 examines the monetary policies adopted to contain the GFC and their impact on the economy, society and politics. Section 3 looks at the monetary policies used to tackle the economic crisis arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, their impacts and how they are laying the foundation for the next financial crisis.
Section 1: Finance—An Unstable Stage
Many writers of different political persuasions (from right, to moderate, to left) commenting on the COVID-19 pandemic, agree that this crisis has exposed fundamental flaws and fractures in our society (see Financial Times 2020a; Friedman and Hatheway 2020; Varoufakis 2020). These include problems in the financial, economic, social and political systems. What are some of these fractures? The economy is weak and unemployment high, the financial system is fragile and volatile, political division is deep and widespread, social and economic inequality is at threatening levels, the environment is degraded and climate change looms ominously, spurring forest fires, rising sea levels, super hurricanes and floods.
To understand the problems we face today, we need to step back and look at history. Chapter 1 discusses some of these problems and places them in the historical context of the rise of the self-regulating market in a capitalist economy. In this chapter, the focus is on the place and the role of finance in the evolution of capitalism, and the role and impact of finance on society.
Stages of Capitalist Development
Finance has historically played an important role in the economy. Banks and moneylenders financed trade in the medieval era. Later they financed large-scale industrial development in Europe, the United States and Japan. Big finance also bank-rolled governments and the wars they waged.
The relationship between finance and economy occupies centre stage in Minsky’s analysis of capitalist development (Whalen 1999).
Climate change is not only one of the great challenges of this century for governments and individuals; it is also a major issue for the millions of micro-, small- and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) that exist across Southeast Asia.
The current level of knowledge about the impact of climate change on this sector is low. There are a number of important questions for which more evidence is needed: Do small business operators think climate change is an important issue? How are SMEs in the region attempting to reduce their emissions, if at all? What do they intend to do in future to deal with a warming climate? What obstacles do they face? And what effective assistance and advice are needed for them to deal with the issue?
This paper summarizes the results of a large-scale, multi-country quantitative assessment of these issues, focusing on SMEs in the five largest economies in ASEAN. The results are illuminating, and provide some guidelines for policymakers, governments, industry associations and climate change advocates as they grapple with the complex issue of helping SMEs work towards a low-emissions future economy.
CLIMATE CHANGE
As Table 1 indicates, every nation in ASEAN already contributes to some extent to the continuing global output of GHG-inducing emissions, such as CO2. Whilst some member states (such as Brunei and Cambodia) produce very low levels, others such as Indonesia are already amongst the biggest generators of emissions globally.
Climate change is already having a tangible impact on the region, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). A number of physical changes are already occurring in the climate and weather patterns of Southeast Asia. These include alterations to monsoon patterns; more heatwaves, cyclonic activity and droughts; rising sea levels; and more precipitation and flooding. The IPCC predicts that as temperatures continue to rise, these problems will be exacerbated, noting that “every additional 0.5°C of global warming causes clearly discernible increases in the intensity and frequency of hot extremes, including heatwaves, and heavy precipitation … There will be an increasing occurrence of some extreme events unprecedented in the observational record with additional global warming…” (IPCC 2021, p. SPM-19). Finally, sea level rises are also “virtually certain” and will threaten major metropolitan regions such as those in Manila, Bangkok and Jakarta (ASEAN 2021).
Astrid Meilasari-Sugiana, Universitas Bakrie, Indonesia; School of Government and Public Policy, Indonesia; and ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute,Siwage Dharma Negara, ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute,Yew-Foong Hui , ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute
When many individuals combine their inputs in production, common property problems arise. Often the use of low incentive wage contracts are necessary to mitigate overuse. However, such contracts mean that workers need direction from others. This is the seed of an organization. The central person in an organization must be able to bare the risks of their decisions, and so the owner of the organization is often the holder of the equity capital, which is used to convince others that they will not bear negative residuals.
Transaction costs are the costs of strengthening a given distribution of economic property rights. When these costs are positive, economic property rights are never perfect and the Coase Theorem does not hold. Furthermore, different distributions of these property rights lead to different levels of joint wealth.
Institutions are the system of legal rules and social norms that enhance individual economic property rights. Individuals take them as exogenous, but they are endogenous to the entire system. Institutions are complicated distributions of economic property rights and are therefore the result of attempts to maximize wealth net of the transaction costs involved. This chapter defines institutions, relates them to property rights, reviews the literature, and provides numerous examples of institutions and their evolution.
Throughout history, individual laborers have often not had freedoms of movement, effort, or work choice. Workers have worked under master/servant relations, indentured servitude, and even slavery. Within marriage, the doctrine of coverture made wives assume the legal identity of their husband. Such restrictions on individual freedoms affect the choices these indivduals make, and lead to various transaction costs. These costs help explain the organization and institutions surrounding nonfree labor.
Output is higher when individuals cooperate and combine their inputs in some type of production. This exposes the attributes of their inputs to other people. Since contracts and agreements cannot prevent overuse of someone elses attributes, transaction costs arise in every form of human production interaction. Specific contracts are designed to mitigate this problem.
One of the greatest placements of wealth into the public domain was the US federal governments decision to issue large land grants to railroads and many small land grants to homesteaders in the nineteenth century. These lands were enormous in size, and putting them in the public domain induced a massive rush to get them. This chapter argues that the government wanted the lands to be taken and occupied, and that this was the benefit of placing them in the public domain, even though the racing was costly and they could have sold the lands.
The traditional economic model implies that ownership is irrelevant for resource allocation. This result is known as the Coase Theorem. The Coase Theorem is just an idea, not a reality. Its importance comes from understanding its logic. It relies on the assumption of zero transaction costs. When this assumption is violated, then the way ownership is organized matters. Hence, a theory of ownership, or a theory of the allocation of property rights, must be based on models of positive transaction costs.