Acemoglu, Daron. “Politics and Economics in Weak and Strong States.” Journal of Monetary Economics 52, no. 7 (2005): 1199–226.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A.. “The Emergence of Weak, Despotic, and Inclusive States.” Working paper, Department of Economics, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2018.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A.. The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. New York: Penguin Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A.. “Paths to Inclusive Political Institutions.” Working paper, Department of Economics, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2016.Google Scholar

Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James A.. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown, 2012.Google Scholar

Adams, Julia. The Familial State: Ruling Families and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, 2005.Google Scholar

Akimoto, Seki 秋元せき. “Meijiki Kyōto no jichi to rengō kukai: Kukai” 明治期京都の自治と連合区会: 区会 [The self-governance and the alliance of ward assemblies in Meiji-period Kyoto: The ward assembly]. In Kindai Kyōto no kaizō: Toshi keiei no kigen, 1850–1918-nen, edited by Yukio, Itō, 195–221. Kyoto: Mineruva Shobō, 2006.Google Scholar

Alsop, James D. “Innovation in Tudor Taxation.” English Historical Review 99, no. 390 (January 1984): 83–93.Google Scholar

Alsop, James D. “The Theory and Practice of Tudor Taxation.” English Historical Review 97, no. 382 (January 1982): 1–30.Google Scholar

Anderson, Perry. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso, 1979.Google Scholar

Andō, Yūichirō 安藤優一郎. Kansei Kaikaku no toshi seisaku: Edo no beika antei to hanmai kakuho 寬政改革の都市政策: 江戶の米価安定と飯米確保 [Urban policy in the Kansei Reforms: The stabilization of rice prices and securing the food supply in Edo]. Tokyo: Azekura Shobō, 2000.Google Scholar

Ansell, Ben W. and Lindvall, Johannes. Inward Conquest: The Political Origins of Modern Public Services. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Aoki, Michio 青木美智男. “Tenpō ikki ron” 天保一揆論 [On the riots of the Tenpō period]. In Kōza Nihon kinseishi, Vol. 6, Tenpōki no seiji to shakai, edited by Michio, Aoki and Tadao, Yamada, 111–82. Tokyo: Yūhikaku, 1981.Google Scholar

Aoyama, Tadamasa 青山忠正. Meiji Ishin to kokka keisei明治維新と国家形成 [The Meiji Restoration and state formation]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 2000.Google Scholar

Appleby, Andrew B. Famine in Tudor and Stuart England. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Arai, Katsuhiro 新井勝紘. “Jiyū minken to kessha” 自由民権と結社 [Freedom and People’s Rights and associations]. In Kesshū, kessha no Nihonshi, edited by Ajio, Fukuta and Tsuneo, Ayabe, 189–201. Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppansha, 2006.Google Scholar

Arano, Yasunori 荒野泰典. “Kinsei no taigaikan” 近世の対外観 [Early modern perceptions of foreign relations]. In Iwanami kōza Nihon tsūshi, Vol. 13, Kinsei (3), edited by Naohiro, Asao, Yoshihiko, Amino, Susumu, Ishii et al., 211–49. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1994.Google Scholar

Archer, Ian W. “Social Order and Disorder.” In The Oxford Handbook of Holinshed’s Chronicles, edited by Kewes, Paulina, Archer, Ian W., and Heal, Felicity, 389–410. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Ariizumi, Sadao 有泉貞夫. Meiji seijishi no kiso katei: Chihō seiji jōkyō shiron 明治政治史の基礎過程: 地方政治状況史論 [Fundamental processes of Meiji political history: A history of local political conditions]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1980.Google Scholar

Arimoto, Masao 有元正雄, Hideo, Kai 甲斐英男, Kiichi, Rai 頼祺一 et al. Meijiki chihō shisōka no kenkyū: Kubota Jirō no shisō to kōdō 明治期地方啓蒙思想家の研究: 窪田次郎の思想と行動 [Studies of local enlightenment thinkers during the Meiji period: The thought and action of Kubota Jirō]. Hiroshima: Keisuisha, 1981.Google Scholar

Ash, Eric H. The Draining of the Fens: Projects, Popular Politics, and State Building in Early Modern England. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Ash, Eric H. “‘A Perfect and Absolut Work’: Expertise, Authority, and the Rebuilding of Dover Harbor, 1579–1583.” Technology and Culture 41, no. 2 (April 2000): 239–68.Google Scholar

Auslin, Michael R. Negotiating with Imperialism: The Unequal Treaties and the Culture of Japanese Diplomacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, Geoff. “The ‘Public’ as a Rhetorical Community in Early Modern England.” In Communities in Early Modern England, edited by Shepard, Alexandra and Withington, Phil, 199–215. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Banno, Masataka 坂野正高. Kindai Chūgoku gaikōshi kenkyū 近代中国外交史研究 [Diplomatic history of early modern China]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1970.Google Scholar

Barker, Hannah. Newspapers, Politics and English Society, 1695–1855. London: Longman, 2000.Google Scholar

Barrow, Clyde W. “Ralph Miliband and the Instrumentalist Theory of the State: The (Mis)Construction of an Analytic Concept.” In Class, Power and the State in Capitalist Society: Essays on Ralph Miliband, edited by Wetherly, P., Barrow, C., and Burnham, P., 84–108. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar

Bartlett, Beatrice S. Monarchs and Ministers: The Grand Council in Mid-Ch’ing China, 1723–1820. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Beetham, David. The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: MacMillan, 1991.Google Scholar

Beier, A. L. Masterless Men: The Vagrancy Problem in England, 1560–1640. London: Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar

Beier, A. L. “Poverty and Progress in Early Modern England.” In The First Modern Society: Essays in English History in Honour of Lawrence Stone, edited by Beier, A. L., Cannadine, David, and Rosenheim, James M., 201–40. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Bendix, Reinhard. Kings or People: Power and the Mandate to Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Bermeo, Nancy. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Berry, Mary Elizabeth. “Public Peace and Private Attachment: The Goals and Conduct of Power in Early Modern Japan.” Journal of Japanese Studies 12, no. 2 (Summer 1986): 237–71.Google Scholar

Besley, Timothy and Persson, Torsten. “The Origins of State Capacity: Property Rights, Taxation, and Politics.” American Economic Review 99, no. 4 (September 2009): 1218–44.Google Scholar

Bix, Herbert P. Peasant Protest in Japan, 1590–1884. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Black, Antony. Political Thought in Europe, 1250–1450. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Black, Eugene C. The Association: British Extraparliamentary Political Organization, 1769–1793. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Bogart, Dan. “Did the Glorious Revolution Contribute to the Transport Revolution? Evidence from Investment in Roads and Rivers.” Economic History Review 64, no. 4 (November 2011): 1073–112.Google Scholar

Bohstedt, John. The Politics of Provisions: Food Riots, Moral Economy, and Market Transition in England, c. 1550–1850. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar

Bol, Peter K. “Emperors Can Claim Antiquity Too: Emperorship and Autocracy Under the New Policies.” In Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics, edited by Ebrey, Patricia B. and Bickford, Maggie, 173–205. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Asia Center, 2006.Google Scholar

Bol, Peter K. Neo-Confucianism in History. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Asia Center, 2008.Google Scholar

Bolitho, Harold. “The Han.” In The Cambridge History of Japan, Vol. 4, Early Modern Japan, edited by Hall, John Whitney, 183–234. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Booth, Alan. “Food Riots in the North-West of England 1790–1801.” Past and Present 77, no. 1 (November 1977): 84–107.Google Scholar

Botsman, Daniel V. Punishment and Power in the Making of Modern Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Braddick, Michael J. State Formation in Early Modern England, c. 1550–1700. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Braddick, Michael J. and Walter, John. Eds. Negotiating Power in Early Modern Society: Order, Hierarchy and Subordination in Britain and Ireland. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Bradley, James E. Popular Politics and the American Revolution in England: Petitions, the Crown, and Public Opinion. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Brewer, John. “English Radicalism in the Age of George III.” In Three British Revolutions: 1641, 1688, 1776, edited by Pocock, J. G. A., 323–67. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Brewer, John. Party Ideology and Popular Politics at the Accession of George III. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Brewer, John. The Sinews of Power: War, Money and the English State, 1688–1783. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1989.Google Scholar

Brooks, Christopher W. Law, Politics, and Society in Early Modern England. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Brooks, Christopher W. Pettyfoggers and Vipers of the Commonwealth: The “Lower Branch” of the Legal Profession in Early Modern England. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Brown, David and Sharman, Frank. “Enclosure: Agreements and Acts.” Journal of Legal History 15, no. 3 (1994): 269–86.Google Scholar

Brown, Philip C. Central Authority and Local Autonomy in the Formation of Early Modern Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Burns, Arthur and Innes, Joanna. Eds. Rethinking the Age of Reform: Britain, 1780–1850. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Burns, J. H. Lordship, Kingship, and Empire: The Idea of Monarchy, 1400–1525. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bush, M. L. The Government Policy of Protector Somerset. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Bush, M. L. “The Tudor Polity and the Pilgrimage of Grace.” Historical Research 80, no. 207 (February 2007): 47–72.Google Scholar

Bush, M. L. “‘Up for the Commonweal’: The Significance of Tax Grievances in the English Rebellions of 1536.” English Historical Review 106, no. 419 (April 1991): 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cannon, John. Parliamentary Reform, 1640–1832. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Carpenter, Daniel. Democracy by Petition: Popular Politics in Transformation, 1790–1870. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Centeno, Miguel Angel. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation-state in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Chen, Chunsheng 陈春声. Shichang jizhi yu shehui bianqian: Shiba shiji Guangdong mijia fenxi 市场机制与社会变迁: 18世纪广东米价分析 [Market mechanism and social change: An analysis of rice prices in eighteenth-century Guangdong]. Guangzhou: Zhongshan daxue chubanshe, 1992.Google Scholar

Chen, Feng 陈锋. “Qingdai qianqi zouxiao zhidu yu zhengce yanbian” 清代前期奏銷制度与政策演变 [The early Qing auditing system and policy change]. Lishi yanjiu, no. 2 (2000): 63–74.Google Scholar

Chiu, Peng-sheng [Qiu Pengsheng] 邱澎生. Dang jingji yushang falü: Ming-Qing Zhongguo de shichang yanhua 當經濟遇上法律: 明清中國的市場演化 [When economy meets law: Market evolution in Ming-Qing China]. Xinbei: Liangjing chuban shiye gongsi, 2018.Google Scholar

Chiu, Peng-sheng. “Shiba shiji Diantong shichang zhong de guanshang guanxi yu liyi guannian” 十八世紀滇銅市場中的官商關係與利益觀念 [Notions of profit and the relations between state and merchant in the eighteenth-century Yunnan copper market], Zhongyang yanjiuyuan lishi yuyan yanjiusuo jikan 72, no. 1 (2001): 49–119.Google Scholar

Chow, Kai-wing. Publishing, Culture, and Power in Early Modern China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Christie, Ian R. Wilkes, Wyvill and Reform: The Parliamentary Reform Movement in British Politics, 1760–1785. London: Macmillan, 1962.Google Scholar

Clark, J. C. D. English Society 1660–1832: Religion, Ideology and Politics during the Ancien Regime. 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Clark, Peter. British Clubs and Societies, 1580–1800: The Origins of an Associational World. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Clark, Peter. “Popular Protest and Disturbance in Kent, 1558–1640.” Economic History Review, New Series 29, no. 3 (August 1976): 365–82.Google Scholar

Cockburn, J. S. A History of English Assizes, 1558–1714. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Coleman, Christopher and Starkey, David. Eds. Revolution Reassessed: Revisions in the History of Tudor Government and Administration. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.Google Scholar

Colley, Linda. Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Colley, Linda. “Eighteenth-Century English Radicalism Before Wilkes.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 31 (1980): 1–19.Google Scholar

Colley, Linda. In Defiance of Oligarchy: The Tory Party, 1714–60. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Corrigan, Philip and Sayer, Derek. The Great Arch: English State Formation as Cultural Revolution. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.Google Scholar

Cowan, Brian W. The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffeehouse. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Cranefield, G. A. The Development of the Provincial Newspaper, 1700–1760. Oxford: Clarendon, 1962.Google Scholar

Cressy, David. Literacy and the Social Order: Reading and Writing in Tudor and Stuart England. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Cromartie, Alan. The Constitutionalist Revolution: An Essay on the History of England, 1450–1642. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Cunningham, Hugh. “The Language of Patriotism, 1750–1914.” History Workshop, no. 12 (Autumn 1981): 8–33.Google Scholar

Cushman, Jennifer W. Fields from the Sea: Chinese Junk Trade with Siam during the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Cust, Richard. The Forced Loan and English Politics, 1626–1628. Oxford: Clarendon, 1987.Google Scholar

Davies, Mike. Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World. New York: Verso, 2001.Google Scholar

De Weerdt, Hilde. Information, Territory, and Networks: The Crisis and Maintenance of Empire in Song China. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Asia Center, 2015.Google Scholar

Dean, David M. “Elizabeth’s Lottery: Political Culture and State Formation in Early Modern England.” Journal of British Studies 50, no. 3 (July 2011): 587–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dean, David M. Law-making and Society in Late Elizabethan England: The Parliament of England, 1584–1601. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Dean, David M. “Parliament, Privy Council, and Local Politics in Elizabethan England: The Yarmouth-Lowestoft Fishing Dispute.” Albion 22, no. 1 (Spring 1990): 39–64.Google Scholar

Deng, Xiaonan 邓小南. Zuzong zhi fa: Bei Song qianqi zhengzhi shulüe 祖宗之法: 北宋前期政治述略 [Methods of the ancestors: A political overview of the early Northern Song]. Beijing: Shenghuo, dushu, xinzhi sanlian shudian, 2006.Google Scholar

Diamond, Jared and Robinson, James. Eds. Natural Experiments of History. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Dickinson, H. T. “The Eighteenth-Century Debate on the Sovereignty of Parliament.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 26 (1976): 189–210.Google Scholar

Dickinson, H. T. The Politics of the People in Eighteenth-Century Britain. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Dickinson, H. T. “The Precursors of Political Radicalism in Augustan Britain.” In Britain in the First Age of Party, 1680–1750: Essays Presented to Geoffrey Holmes, edited by Jones, Clyve, 63–84. London: The Hambledon Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Dincecco, Mark. Political Transformation and Public Finances: Europe, 1650–1913. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Dincecco, Mark. “The Rise of Effective States in Europe.” Journal of Economic History 75, no. 3 (September 2015): 901–18.Google Scholar

Dincecco, Mark and Katz, Gabriel. “State Capacity and Long-run Economic Performance.” Economic Journal 126, no. 590 (February 2016): 189–218.Google Scholar

Dincecco, Mark and Prado, Mauricio. “Warfare, Fiscal Capacity, and Performance.” Journal of Economic Growth 17, no. 3 (2012): 171–203.Google Scholar

Dincecco, Mark and Wang, Yuhua. “Violent Conflict and Political Development over the Long Run: China Versus Europe.” Annual Review of Political Science 21 (2018): 341–58.Google Scholar

Dore, R. P. Education in Tokugawa Japan. Ann Arbor: Center for Japanese Studies, University of Michigan, 1992.Google Scholar

Downie, J. A. “The Development of the Political Press.” In Britain in the First Age of Party, 1680–1750: Essays Presented to Geoffrey Holmes, edited by Jones, Clyve, 111–28. London: The Hambledon Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Downing, Brian. The Military Revolution and Political Change: Origins of Democracy and Autocracy in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Duara, Prasenjit. Culture, Power, and the State: Rural North China, 1900–1942. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 1988.Google Scholar

Dunstan, Helen. Conflicting Counsels to Confuse the Age: A Documentary Study of Political Economy in Qing China, 1644–1840. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan, 1996.Google Scholar

Dunstan, Helen. State or Merchant? Political Economy and Political Process in 1740s China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2006.Google Scholar

Early Modern Research Group. “Commonwealth: The Social, Cultural, and Conceptual Contexts of an Early Modern Keyword.” Historical Journal 54, no. 3 (September 2011): 659–87.Google Scholar

Eastwood, David. “Parliament and Locality: Representation and Responsibility in Late-Hanoverian England.” Parliamentary History 17, no. 1 (February 1998): 68–81Google Scholar

Edgerton-Tarpley, Kathryn. Tears from Iron: Cultural Responses to Famine in Nineteenth-Century China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Ehlers, Maren A. Give and Take: Poverty and the Status Order in Early Modern Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2018.Google Scholar

Elman, Benjamin A. Civil Examinations and Meritocracy in Late Imperial China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Elton, G. R. “An Early Tudor Poor Law.” Economic History Review, New Series 6, no. 1 (1953): 55–67.Google Scholar

Elton, G. R. The Parliament of England, 1559–1581. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Elton, G. R. The Tudor Revolution in Government: Administrative Changes in the Reign of Henry VIII. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Elvin, Mark. “On Water Control and Management during the Ming and Qing Periods: A Review Article.” Ch’ing-shih wen-ti, 3, no. 3 (1975): 82–103.Google Scholar

Elvin, Mark. The Retreat of the Elephants: An Environmental History of China. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Emura, Eiichi 江村栄一. Jiyū minken kakumei no kenkyū 自由民権革命の研究 [A study of the Freedom and People’s Rights Revolution]. Tokyo: Hōsei Daigaku Shuppankyoku, 1984.Google Scholar

Emura, Eiichi. “Jiyū minken wo kangaeru” 自由民権を考える [Thinking about Freedom and People’s Rights]. In Jiyū minken to Meiji kenpō, edited by Eiichi, Emura, 1–27. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kobunkan, 1995.Google Scholar

Epstein, James A. “The Constitutional Idiom: Radical Reasoning, Rhetoric and Action in Early Nineteenth-Century England.” Journal of Social History 23, no. 3 (Spring 1990): 553–74.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. R. Freedom and Growth: The Rise of States and Markets in Europe, 1300–1750. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar

Ertman, Thomas. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Ertman, Thomas. “Otto Hintze, Stein Rokkan and Charles Tilly’s Theory of European State-building.” In Does War Make States? Investigations of Charles Tilly’s Historical Sociology, edited by Kaspersen, Lars Bo and Strandsbjerg, Jeppe, 52–70. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Evans, Peter. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Falvey, Heather. “Crown Policy and Local Economic Context in the Berkhamsted Common Enclosure Dispute, 1618–42.” Rural History 12, no. 2 (2001): 123–58.Google Scholar

Fan, Jinmin 范金民. Ming Qing shangshi jiufen yu shangye susong 明清商事纠纷与商业诉讼 [Ming-Qing business disputes and commercial lawsuits]. Nanjing: Nanjing daxue chubanshe, 2007.Google Scholar

Fang, Qiang. “Hot Potatoes: Chinese Complaint Systems from Early Times to the Late Qing (1898).” Journal of Asian Studies 68, no. 4 (November 2009): 1105–35.Google Scholar

Fideler, Paul A. “Poverty, Policy and Providence: The Tudors and the Poor.” In Political Thought and the Tudor Commonwealth, edited by Fideler, Paul A. and Mayer, T. F., 199–228. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Anthony. The Outbreak of the English Civil War. London: Edward Arnold, 1981.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Anthony and MacCulloch, Diarmaid. Tudor Rebellions. 5th edition. London: Pearson, 2004.Google Scholar

Fortin, Jessica “Is There a Necessary Condition for Democracy? The Role of State Capacity in Postcommunist Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 45, no. 7 (2012): 903–30.Google Scholar

Foxley, Rachel. The Levellers: Radical Political Thought in the English Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Fraser, Peter. “Public Petitioning and Parliament Before 1832.” History 46, no. 158 (1961): 195–211.Google Scholar

Fujii, Jōji 藤井讓治. “17 seki no Nihon—Buke kokka no keisei” 一七世紀の日本一武家の国家の形成 [Seventeenth-century Japan – The formation of a samurai state]. In Iwanami kōza Nihon tsūshi, Vol. 12, Kinsei (2), edited by Naohiro, Asao, Yoshihiko, Amino, Susumu, Ishii et al., 34–64. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1994.Google Scholar

Fujii, Jōji. Bakuhan ryōshu no kenryoku kōzō 幕藩領主の権力構造 [The power structure of the lords of shogunate and domain]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2002.Google Scholar

Fujiki, Hisashi 藤木久志. Katanagari: Buki o fūinshita minshū 刀狩り: 武器を封印した民衆 [The confiscation of swords: A populace disarmed]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2005.Google Scholar

Fujimoto, Hitofumi 藤本仁文. Shōgun kenryoku to kinsei kokka 将軍権力と近世国家 [The power of the shogun and the early modern state]. Tokyo: Hanawa Shobō, 2018.Google Scholar

Fujita, Satoru 藤田覚. Kinsei seijishi to Tennō 近世政治史と天皇 [Early modern political history and the emperor]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1999.Google Scholar

Fujita, Satoru. Kinsei shiryōron no sekai 近世史料論の世界 [The world seen from early modern historical documents]. Tokyo: Azekura Shobō, 2012.Google Scholar

Fujita, Satoru. Matsudaira Sadanobu: Seiji kaikaku ni idonda rōjū 松平定信: 政治改革に挑んだ老中 [Matusaira Sadanobu: The member of the Council of Elders who tackled political reform]. Tokyo: Chūō Kōronsha, 1993.Google Scholar

Fukawa, Kiyoshi 布川清司. Kinsei shomin no ishiki to seikatsu: Mutsu kuni nōmin no baai 近世庶民の意識と生活: 陸奥国農民の場合 [The consciousness and lives of early modern commoners: The case of Mutsu domain]. Tokyo: Nōsan Gyoson Bunka Kyōkai, 1984.Google Scholar

Fukaya, Katsumi 深谷克己. “18 seiki kōhan no Nihon” 18世紀後半の日本 [Japan in the second half of the eighteenth century]. In Iwanami kōza Nihon tsūshi, Vol. 14, Kinsei (4), edited by Naohiro, Asao, Yoshihiko, Amino, Susumu, Ishii et al., 1–65. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1995.Google Scholar

Fukaya, Katsumi. Hyakushō ikki no rekishiteki kōzō 百姓一揆の歴史的構造 [The historical structure of peasant revolts]. Enlarged and revised edition. Tokyo: Azekura Shobō, 1986.Google Scholar

Fukaya, Katsumi. Kinsei no kokka shakai to Tennō 近世の国家・社会と天皇 [The state, society, and the emperor in the early modern era]. Tokyo: Azekura Shobō, 1991.Google Scholar

Fukaya, Katsumi. “Kinsei seiji to hyakushō meyasu” 近世政治と百姓目安 [Early modern politics and petition boxes for commoners]. In Minshū undōshi: Kinsei kara kindai e, Vol. 2, Shakai ishiki to sekaizō, edited by Kōtarō, Iwata, 9–118. Tokyo: Aoki Shoten, 1999.Google Scholar

Fukuda, Chizuru 福田千鶴. Bakuhanseiteki chitsujo to oie sōdō 幕藩制的秩序と御家騒動 [The social order of the bakuhan and domainal house disturbances]. Tokyo: Azekura Shobō, 1999.Google Scholar

Fukui, Atsushi 福井淳. “Tasai na kessha katsudō” 多彩な結社の活動 [The diversity of association activities]. In Jiyū minken to Meiji kenpō, edited by Eiichi, Emura, 51–92. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kobunkan, 1995.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. “Governance: What Do We Know, and How Do We Know It?” Annual Review of Political Science 19 (2016): 89–105.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. State-building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis. “What Is Governance?” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 26, no. 3 (July 2013): 347–68.Google Scholar

Fuma, Susumu 夫馬進. Chūgoku zenkai zendōshi kenkyū 中国善会善堂史硏究 [A study of benevolent societies and benevolent halls in China]. Kyoto: Dōhōsha, 1997.Google Scholar

Gan, Huaizhen 甘怀真. Huangquan, liyi yu jingdian quanshi: Zhongguo gudai zhengzhishi yanjiu 皇权, 礼仪与经典诠释: 中国古代政治史硏究 [Imperial power, rituals and classical interpretation: A political history of ancient China]. Shanghai: Huadong shifan daxue chubanshe, 2008.Google Scholar

Garfias, Francisco. “Elite Competition and State Capacity Development: Theory and Evidence from Post-Revolutionary Mexico.” American Political Science Review 112, no. 2 (May 2018): 339–57.Google Scholar

Gauci, Perry. Politics and Society in Great Yarmouth, 1660–1722. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Gauci, Perry. The Politics of Trade: The Overseas Merchant in State and Society, 1660–1720. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

George, Timothy S. “Tanaka Shōzō’s Vision of an Alternative Constitutional Modernity for Japan.” In Public Spheres, Private Lives in Modern Japan, 1600–1950, edited by Bernstein, Gail Lee, Gordon, Andrew, and Nakai, Kate Wildman, 89–116. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Asia Center, 2005.Google Scholar

Gibson, Josh. “The Chartists and the Constitution: Revisiting British Popular Constitutionalism.” Journal of British Studies 56 (January 2017): 70–90.Google Scholar

Gilley, Bruce. The Right to Rule: How States Win and Lose Legitimacy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Gordon, Andrew. Labor and Imperial Democracy in Prewar Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Gorski, Philip. The Disciplinary Revolution: Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Gorski, Philip and Swaroop Sharma, Vivek. “Beyond the Tilly Thesis: ‘Family Values’ and State Formation in Latin Christendom.” In Does War Make States? Investigations of Charles Tilly’s Historical Sociology, edited by Kaspersen, Lars Bo and Strandsbjerg, Jeppe, 98–124. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Grafstein, Robert. “The Failure of Weber’s Conception of Legitimacy: Its Causes and Implications.” Journal of Politics 43, no. 2 (May 1981): 456–72.Google Scholar

Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Books. New York: International Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. “Beyond War and Contracts: The Medieval and Religious Roots of the European State.” Annual Review of Political Science 23 (May 2020): 19–36.Google Scholar

Guo, Songyi 郭松义. “Qingdai de zaihai he nongye” 清代的灾害和农业 [Calamity and agriculture in the Qing dynasty]. In Zhongguo gudai zaihaishi yanjiu, edited by Zhiqing, Hao, 273–300. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 2007.Google Scholar

Gurney, Peter J. “The Democratic Idiom: Languages of Democracy in the Chartist Movement.” Journal of Modern History 86, no. 3 (September 2014): 566–602.Google Scholar

Guy, John. Tudor England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R.. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Halliday, Paul D. Dismembering the Body Politic: Partisan Politics in England’s Towns, 1650–1730. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Han, Seunghyun. After the Prosperous Age: State and Elites in Early Nineteenth-Century Suzhou. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2016.Google Scholar

Han, Seunghyun. “Changing Roles of Local Elites from the 1720s to the 1830s.” In The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 9, Part Two, The Ch’ing Dynasty to 1800, edited by Peterson, Willard J., 649–700. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Hara, Shōgo 原昭午. “Bakufuhō ni okeru kuniyaku-fushinsei ni tsuite” 幕府法における国役普請制について [The system of kuniyaku-fushin in shogunal law]. Gifu shigaku, no. 57 (1970): 1–13.Google Scholar

Hara, Shōgo. Kaga-han ni miru bakuhansei kokka seiritsu shiron 加賀藩にみる幕藩制国家成立史論 [A history of the foundation of the state in the bakuhan system as seen from Kaga domain]. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai, 1981.Google Scholar

Harling, Philip. The Waning of “Old Corruption”: The Politics of Economical Reform in Britain, 1779–1846. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.Google Scholar

Harris, Bob. Politics and the Nation: Britain in the Mid-Eighteenth Century. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Harris, Michael. “Print and Politics in the Age of Walpole.” In Britain in the Age of Walpole, edited by Black, Jeremy, 189–210. London: MacMillan Education, 1984.Google Scholar

Harriss, G. L. “Medieval Doctrines in the Debates on Supply, 1610–1629.” In Faction and Parliament: Essays on Early Stuart History, edited by Sharpe, Kevin, 73–104. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Harriss, G. L. “Theory and Practice in Royal Taxation: Some Observations.” English Historical Review 97, no. 385 (October 1982): 811–19.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, Seiichi 長谷川成一. Hirosaki han 弘前藩 [Hirosaki domain]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 2004.Google Scholar

Hattori, Takeshi 服部敬. Kindai chihō seiji to suiri doboku 近代地方政治と水利土木 [Early modern local politics and water control public works]. Kyoto: Shibunkaku, 1995.Google Scholar

Hayami, Akira and Matao, Miyamoto. Eds. Keizai shakai no seiritsu: 17th–18th seiki [The formation of an economic society: Seventeenth and eighteenth centuries]. Nihon keizaishi, 1. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1988.Google Scholar

Hayami, Akira, Osamu, Saitō and Toby, Ronald P.. Eds. The Economic History of Japan: 1600–1990, Vol. 1, Emergence of Economic Society in Japan, 1600–1859. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

He, Weiguo 和卫国. Zhishui zhengzhi: Qingdai guojia yu Qiantangjiang haitang gongcheng yanjiu 治水政治: 清代国家与钱塘江海塘工程研究 [Water-control politics: A study on the relationship between the state and the Qiantang River seawall project in the Qing dynasty]. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 2015.Google Scholar

He, Wenkai. Paths toward the Modern Fiscal State: England, Japan, and China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

He, Wenkai. “Public Interest and the Financing of Local Water Control in Qing China, 1750–1850,” Social Science History 39, no. 3 (Fall 2015): 409–30.Google Scholar

He, Wenkai. “‘Public Interest’ as a Basis for Early Modern State-Society Interactions: Water Control Projects in Qing China, 1750–1850.” Environment and History, 23 (2017): 455–76.Google Scholar

He, Wenkai和文凯. “Qianlong chao tongqian guanli de zhengce taolun ji shijian” 乾隆朝铜钱管理的政策讨论及实践 [The debate and practice of the copper coin supply policy during the reign of Qianlong]. Zhongguo jingjishi yanjiu, no. 1 (2016): 125–41.Google Scholar

Hindle, Steve. “Dearth and the English Revolution: The Harvest Crisis of 1647–50.” Economic History Review, New Series 61, no. S1 (August 2008): 64–98.Google Scholar

Hindle, Steve. “Imaging Insurrection in Seventeenth-Century England: Representations of the Midland Rising of 1607.” History Workshop Journal, no. 66 (Autumn 2008): 21–61.Google Scholar

Hindle, Steve. On the Parish? The Micro-politics of Poor Relief in Rural England, c. 1550–1750. Oxford: Clarendon, 2004.Google Scholar

Hindle, Steve. “Persuasion and Protest in the Caddington Common Enclosure Dispute, 1635–1639.” Past and Present, no. 158 (February 1998): 37–78.Google Scholar

Hindle, Steve. “The Political Culture of the Middling Sort in English Rural Communities, c. 1550–1700.” In The Politics of the Excluded, c. 1500–1850, edited by Harris, Tim, 125–52. New York: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar

Hindle, Steve. “A Sense of Place? Becoming and Belonging in the Rural Parish, 1550–1650.” In Communities in Early Modern England, edited by Shepard, Alexandra and Withington, Phil, 96–114. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hindle, Steve. The State and Social Change in Early Modern England, c. 1550–1640. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.Google Scholar

Hipkin, Stephen. “The Structure, Development, and Politics of the Kent Grain Trade, 1552–1647.” Economic History Review 61, no. S1 (August 2008): 99–139.Google Scholar

Hirakawa, Arata 平川新. “Bakufu kanryō to rieki shūdan” 幕府官僚と利益集団 [Shogunal bureaucracy and interest groups]. Rekishigaku kenkyū 698 (June 1997): 34–52.Google Scholar

Hirakawa, Arata. “Bunsei-Tenpōki no bakusei” 文政・天保期の幕政 [Shogunal administration during the Bunsei and Tenpōki periods]. In Iwanami kōza Nihon rekishi, Vol. 14, Kinsei (5), edited by Tōru, Ōtsu, Eiji, Sakurai and Jōji, Fujii, 1–12. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2013.Google Scholar

Hirakawa, Arata. “Chiiki keizai no tenkai” 地域経済の展開 [The development of a regional economy]. In Iwanami kōza Nihon tsūshi, Vol. 15, Kinsei (5), edited by Satoru, Fujita, Naohiro, Asao, Yoshihiko, Amino et al., 111–48. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1995.Google Scholar

Hirakawa, Arata. Funsō to seron: Kinsei minshū no seiji sanka 紛争と世論: 近世民衆の政治参加 [Conflict and public opinion: Modern popular political participation]. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai, 1996.Google Scholar

Hirakawa, Arata. “‘Gunchū’ kōkyōken no keisei” 「郡中」公共圏の形成 [The creation of a “district-based” public sphere]. Nihonshi kenkyū, no. 511 (2005): 41–60.Google Scholar

Hirano, Tetsuya 平野哲也. “Kitakamigawa shitaryūiki ni okeru mura no kurashi to hyakushō sōzoku” 北上川下流域における村の暮らしと百姓相続 [The livelihood of villages on the lower reaches of the Kitakami river and household reproduction of farmers]. In Kōza Tōhoku no rekishi, Vol. 2, Toshi to mura, edited by Arata, Hirakawa and Masaki, Chiba, 197–221. Osaka: Seibundō Shuppan Kabushiki Kaisha, 2014.Google Scholar

Hirata, Shigeki 平田茂樹. Sōdai seiji kōzō kenkyū 宋代政治構造研究 [A study of Song-dynasty political structure]. Tokyo: Kyūko Shoin, 2012.Google Scholar

Hirst, Derek. “Making Contact: Petitions and the English Republic.” Journal of British Studies 45, no. 1 (January 2006): 26–50.Google Scholar

Ho, Hon-wai [He Hanwei] 何漢威. Guangxu chunian (1876–1879) Huabei de dahanzai 光緖初年 (1876–1879) 華北的大旱災 [The great drought in North China in the early Guangxu reign (1876–1879)]. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric. Primitive Rebels: Studies in Archaic Forms of Social Movement in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Philip T. “Early Modern France, 1450–1700.” In Fiscal Crises, Liberty, and Representative Government, 1450–1789, edited by Hoffman, Philip T. and Norberg, Kathryn, 226–52. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Philip T. “What Do States Do? Politics and Economic History.” Journal of Economic History 75, no. 2 (June 2015): 303–32.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Philip T. Why Did Europe Conquer the World? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Holmes, Clive. “Charles I: A Case of Mistaken Identity.” Past and Present, no. 205 (November 2009): 175–237.Google Scholar

Holmes, Clive. “Drainers and Fenmen: The Problem of Popular Political Consciousness in the Seventeenth Century.” In Order and Disorder in Early Modern England, edited by Fletcher, Anthony and Stevenson, John, 166–95. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Holmes, Clive. Seventeenth-Century Lincolnshire. Lincoln: History of Lincolnshire Committee, 1980.Google Scholar

Honjō, Eijirō 本庄榮治郎. Tokugawa bakufu no beika chōsetsu 德川幕府の米價調節 [Regulation of rice prices by the Tokugawa shogunate]. Kyoto: Kōbundō, 1924.Google Scholar

Hoppit, Julian. “Attitudes to Credit in Britain, 1680–1790.” Historical Journal 33, no. 2 (June 1990): 305–22.Google Scholar

Hosaka, Satoru 保坂智. “Hyakushō ikki” 百姓一揆 [Peasant uprisings]. In Iwanami kōza Nihon tsūshi, Vol. 13, Kinsei (3), edited by Naohiro, Asao, Yoshihiko, Amino, Susumu, Ishii et al., 99–132. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1994.Google Scholar

Hosaka, Satoru. “Hyakushō ikki e – Sono kyozō to jitsuzō” 百姓一揆へ 一 その虚像と実像 [Towards peasant uprisings – Image and reality]. In Nihon no kinsei, Vol. 10, Kindai e no taido, edited by Tatsuya, Tsuji, 167–228. Tokyo: Chūō Kōronsha, 1993.Google Scholar

Hosaka, Satoru. Hyakushō ikki to gimin no kenkyū 百姓一揆と義民の研究 [Studies on peasant uprisings and martyrs for justice]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 2006.Google Scholar

Hoshi, Ayao 星斌夫. Chūgoku shakai fukushi seisakushi no kenkyū: Shindai no shinsaisō o chūshin ni 中国社会福祉政策史の研究: 清代の賑済倉を中心に [History of social welfare policy in China]. Tokyo: Kokusho Kankōkai, 1985.Google Scholar

Hou, Yijie 侯宜杰. Qingmo guohui qingyuan fengyun 清末国会请愿风云 [The storm of petitions for an elected parliament in the late Qing]. Beijing: Beijing shifan daxue chubanshe, 2015.Google Scholar

Howell, David L. “Fecal Matters: Prolegomenon to a History of Shit in Japan.” In, Japan at Nature’s Edge: The Environmental Context of a Global Power, edited by Miller, Ian J., Thomas, Julia Adney and Walker, Brett L., 137–51. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hoyle, Richard W. “Agrarian Agitation in Mid-Sixteenth-Century Norfolk: A Petition of 1553.” Historical Journal 44, no. 1 (2001): 223–38.Google Scholar

Hoyle, Richard W. “Crown, Parliament and Taxation in Sixteenth-Century England.” English Historical Review 109, no. 434 (November 1994): 1174–96.Google Scholar

Hoyle, Richard W. “Disafforestation and Drainage: The Crown as Entrepreneur?” In The Estates of the English Crown, 1558–1640, edited by Hoyle, Richard W., 353–88. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Hoyle, Richard W. “The Masters of Requests and the Small Change of Jacobean Patronage.” English Historical Review 126, no. 520 (June 2011): 544–81.Google Scholar

Hoyle, Richard W. “Petitioning as Popular Politics in Early Sixteenth-century England.” Historical Research 75, no. 190 (November 2002): 365–89.Google Scholar

Hsiao, Kung-chuan. Rural China: Imperial Control in the Nineteenth Century. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Hui, Victoria Tin-bor. War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Hung, Ho-Fung. Protest with Chinese Characteristics: Demonstrations, Riots, and Petitions in the Mid-Qing Dynasty. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Huzzey, Richard and Miller, Henry. “Petitions, Parliament and Political Culture: Petitioning the House of Commons, 1780–1918.” Past and Present 248, no. 1 (August 2020): 123–64.Google Scholar

Iizuka, Kazuyuki 飯塚一幸. Meijiki no chihō seido to meibōka 明治期の地方制度と名望家 [Local systems and local leaders during the Meiji period]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 2017.Google Scholar

Ike, Susumu 池 享. “Chiiki kokka no bunritsu kara tōitsu kokka no kakuritsu e” 地域国家の分立から統一国家の確立へ [From the decentralization of regional states to state unification]. In Shintaikei Nihonshi, Vol. 1, Kokkashi, edited by Masato, Miyachi, Fumihiko, Gomi, Makoto, Satō et al., 221–65. Tokyo: Yamagawa Shuppansha, 2006.Google Scholar

Ikegami, Eiko. The Taming of the Samurai: Honorific Individualism and the Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Ikeuchi, Nagayoshi. “Bakufu no Kyōhō kikin ni okeru bakuryō-shiryō e no kyūsai” 幕府の享保飢饉における幕府領・私領への救済 [Shogunal relief to shogunal possessions and domain lands during the Kyōhō famine]. Rekishi chirigaku no. 145 (1989): 1–20.Google Scholar

Ikeuchi, Satoshi 池内敏. “Kyōkai no ishiki” 境界の意識 [Consciousness of boundaries]. In Nihon no kinsei, Vol. 16, Minshū no kokoro, edited by Masaki, Hirota, 253–94. Tokyo: Chūō Kōronsha, 1994.Google Scholar

Inada, Masahiro 稲田雅洋. Nihon kindai shakai seiritsuki no minshū undō: Konmintō kenkyū josetsu 日本近代社会成立期の民衆運動: 困民党研究序說 [Popular movements during the formative period of modern society in Japan: An introduction to research on the Distressed People’s Party]. Tokyo: Chikuma Shobō, 1990.Google Scholar

Innes, Joanna. “The Domestic Face of the Military-Fiscal State.” In An Imperial State at War: Britain from 1689 to 1815, edited by Stone, Lawrence, 96–127. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

Innes, Joanna. “Legislation and Public Participation, 1760–1830.” In The British and Their Laws in the Eighteenth Century, edited by Lemmings, David, 102–32. Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Innes, Joanna. “The Local Acts of a National Parliament: Parliament’s Role in Sanctioning Local Action in Eighteenth-Century Britain.” Parliamentary History 17, no. 1 (February 1998): 23–47.Google Scholar

Innes, Joanna. “Parliament and the Shaping of Eighteenth-Century English Social Policy.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 40 (1990): 63–92.Google Scholar

Innes, Joanna. “People and Power in British Politics to 1850.” In Re-imagining Democracy in the Age of Revolutions: America, France, Britain, Ireland, 1750–1850, edited by Innes, Joanna and Philp, Mark, 129–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Innes, Joanna. “Prisons for the Poor: English Bridewells, 1555–1800.” In Labour, Law, and Crime: A Historical Perspective, edited by Snyder, Francis and Hay, Douglas, 42–122. London: Tavistock Publications, 1987.Google Scholar

Innes, Joanna. “The State and the Poor: Eighteenth-Century England in European Perspective.” In Rethinking Leviathan: The Eighteenth-Century State in Britain and Germany, edited by Brewer, John and Hellmuth, Eckhart, 225–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Irokawa, Daikichi 色川大吉. Ed. Santama jiyū minken shiryō shū 三多摩自由民権史料集 [Collected historical materials on Santama Freedom and People’s Rights]. Tokyo: Daiwa Shobō, 1979.Google Scholar

Iwai, Shigeki 岩井茂樹. “Shindai kokka zaisei ni okeru chūō to chihō” 淸代國家財政における中央と地方 [The center-local relationship in the fiscal system of the Qing dynasty]. Tōyōshi kenkyū 42, no. 2 (1983): 318–46.Google Scholar

Iwaki, Takuji 岩城卓二. “Kinsei chūgōki no murashakai to gōyado, yōtashi, shitayado” 近世中後期の村社会と郷宿・用達・下宿] [Village society and the lodging of petitions with shogunal officials through various legal inns in the mid- and late Tokugawa era]. In Minshū undōshi: Kinsei kara kindai e, Vol. 3, Shakai to chitsujo, edited by Yutaka, Yabuta, 73–99. Tokyo: Aoki Shoten, 2000.Google Scholar

Iwata, Kōtarō 岩田浩太郎. Kinsei toshi sōjō no kenkyū: Minshū undōshi ni okeru kōzō to shutai 近世都市騒擾の研究: 民衆運動史における構造と主体 [A study of early modern urban riots: Structure and subjectivity in popular movements]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 2004.Google Scholar

Iwata, Kōtarō. “Toshi sōjō to shokuryō kakuho” 都市騒擾と食糧確保 [Urban riots and securing the food supply]. In Shakai to chitsujo, Vol. 3, Minshū undōshi: Kinsei kara kindai e, edited by Yutaka, Yabuta, 229–52. Tokyo: Aoki Shoten, 2000.Google Scholar

Jansen, Marius B. The Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Jessop, Bob. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Jones, Calvert W. “Adviser to the King: Experts, Rationalization, and Legitimacy.” World Politics 71, no. 1 (January 2019): 1–43.Google Scholar

Jones, D. W. War and Economy in the Age of William III and Marlborough. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar

Jones, Gareth Stedman. “Rethinking Chartism.” In Languages of Class: Studies in English Working Class History, 1832–1982, 90–178. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Jones, Whitney R. D. The Tree of Commonwealth, 1450–1793. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Kanai, Takanori 金井隆典. “‘Aiso’ to iu shisō” 「哀訴」という思想 [The idea of the “appeal”]. In Minshū undōshi: Kinsei kara kindai, Vol. 4, Kindai ikōki no minshūzō, edited by Katsuhiro, Arai, 157–82. Tokyo: Aoki Shoten, 2000.Google Scholar

Kantorowicz, Ernst H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Kasaya, Kazuhiko 笠谷和比古. Kinsei buke shakai no seiji kōzō 近世武家社会の政治構造 [The political structure of early modern samurai society]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1993.Google Scholar

Kasaya, Kazuhiko. “Kinsei kuniyaku-fushin no seijishiteki ichi” 近世国役普請の政治史的位置 [The place of kuniyaku-fushin in the political history of early modern Japan]. Shirin 59, no 4 (July 1976): 530–74.Google Scholar

Kasaya, Kazuhiko. Samurai no shisō: Nihon-gata soshiki, tsuyosa no kōzō 士の思想: 日本型組織・強さの構造 [Samurai thought: Japanese-type organization and the structure of its strength]. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha, 1993.Google Scholar

Kasaya, Kazuhiko. “Shōgun to daimyō” 将軍と大名 [Shogun and daimyo]. In Nihon no kinsei, Vol. 3, Shihai no shikumi, edited by Jōji, Fujii, 45–98. Tokyo: Chūō Kōronsha, 1991.Google Scholar

Kasaya, Kazuhiko. Shukun “oshikome” no kōzō: Kinsei daimyo to kashindan 主君「押込」の構造: 近世大名と家臣団 [‘Secluding’ the lord: Early modern daimyo and their retainers]. Tokyo: Heibonsha, 1988.Google Scholar

Katō, Takashi. “Governing Edo.” In Edo and Paris: Urban Life and the State in the Early Modern Era, edited by McClain, James L., Merriman, John M., and Kaoru, Ugawa, 41–67. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Katsumata, Shizuo 勝俣鎮夫. “Jūgo-jūroku seiki no Nihon” 15−16世紀の日本 [Japan in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries]. In Iwanami kōza Nihon tsūshi, Vol. 10, Chūsei (3), edited by Shizuo, Katsumata, Naohiro, Asao, Yoshihiko, Amino et al., 1–57. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1994.Google Scholar

Katsuta, Masaharu 勝田政治. “Minken undōka no mishūzō” 民権運動家の民衆像 [The image of the people among People’s Rights Movement activists]. In Minshū undōshi: Kinsei kara kindai e, Vol. 4, Kindai ikōki no mishūzō, edited by Katsuhiro, Arai, 207–40. Tokyo: Aoki Shoten, 2000.Google Scholar

Kawai, Kenji 川合賢二. “Ōshio no rango no Ōsaka shisei ni tsuite—Kyūjutsusaku wo chūshin to shite” [On governance in Osaka after the Ōshio uprising – Relief policy] 大塩の乱後の大坂施政について—救恤策を中心として. Historia, no. 94 (March 1982): 56–69.Google Scholar

Kawashima, Takashi 川島孝. “Kinsei kuniyaku-fushin ni tsuite no hitotsu kōsatsu” 近世国役普請についての一考察 [An investigation into early modern kuniyaku-fushin]. Rekishi kenkyū, no. 21 (December 1980): 1–31.Google Scholar

Keirn, Tim. “Parliament, Legislation and the Regulation of English Textile Industries, 1689–1714.” In Stilling the Grumbling Hive: The Response to Social and Economic Problems in England, 1689–1750, edited by Davison, Lee, Hitchcock, Tim, Keirn, Tim and Shoemaker, Robert B., 1–24. Stroud: Alan Sutton, 1992.Google Scholar

Kelly, Paul. “Constituents’ Instructions to Members of Parliament in the Eighteenth Century.” In Party and Management in Parliament, 1660–1784, edited by Jones, Clyve, 169–89. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Mark E. “Fen Drainage, the Central Government, and Local Interest: Carleton and the Gentlemen of South Holland.” Historical Journal 26, no. 1 (March 1983): 15–37.Google Scholar

Kikuchi, Isao 菊治勇夫. Kikin kara yomu kinsei shakai 飢饉から読む近世社会 [Early modern society as seen from famine]. Tokyo: Azekura Shobō, 2003.Google Scholar

Kikuchi, Isao. Kinsei no kikin 近世の飢饉 [Famine in the early modern world]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1997.Google Scholar

Kim, Kyu Hyun. The Age of Visions and Arguments: Parliamentarianism and the National Public Sphere in Early Meiji Japan. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Asia Center, 2007.Google Scholar

Kiser, Edgar and Cai, Yong. “War and Bureaucratization in Qin China: Exploring an Anomalous Case.” American Sociological Review 68, no. 4 (August 2003): 511–39.Google Scholar

Kitahara, Itoko 北原糸子. Nihon saigaishi 日本災害史 [The history of disasters in Japan]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 2006.Google Scholar

Kitahara, Itoko. Toshi to hinkon no shakaishi: Edo kara Tōkyō e 都市と貧困の社会史: 江戶から東京へ [The social history of poverty in early modern urban Japan]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1995.Google Scholar

Kitamura, Toshio 喜多村俊夫. Nihon kangai suiri kankō no shiteki kenkyū: Sōron hen日本灌漑水利慣行の史的硏究: 總論編 [A historical study of customary irrigation rights in Japan: General volume]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1971.Google Scholar

Knights, Mark. “London’s ‘Monster’ Petition of 1680.” Historical Journal 36, no. 1 (1993): 39–67.Google Scholar

Knights, Mark. “‘The Lowest Degree of Freedom’: The Right to Petition Parliament, 1640–1800.” In “Pressure and Parliament,” edited by Richard Huzzey, supplement, Parliamentary History 37, no. S1 (2018): 18–34.Google Scholar

Knights, Mark. “Petitioning and the Political Theorists: John Locke, Algernon Sidney and London’s ‘Monster’ Petition of 1680.” Past & Present, no. 138 (February 1993): 94–111.Google Scholar

Knights, Mark. Politics and Opinion in Crisis, 1678–81. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Knights, Mark. “Regulation and Rival Interests in the 1690s.” In Regulating the British Economy, 1660–1850, edited by Gauci, Perry, 63–81. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2011.Google Scholar

Knights, Mark. Representation and Misrepresentation in Later Stuart Britain: Partisanship and Political Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Knights, Mark. Trust and Distrust: Corruption in Office in Britain and Its Empire, 1600–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, Takehiro 小林丈広. “Bakumatsu-Ishinki Kyōto ni okeru toshi shinkōsaku to kōkyōsei” 幕末維新期京都における都市振興策と公共性 [The public nature and measures to the promote the urban economy in Kyoto during the late Tokugawa and early Meiji period]. Nihonshi kenkyū, no. 606 (February 2013): 98–120.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, Takehiro. “Bakumatsu-Ishinki Kyōto no toshi gyōsei” 幕末維新期京都の都市行政 [The urban administration in Kyoto in the late Tokugawa and early Meiji period]. In Kindai Kyōto no kaizō: Toshi keiei no kigen, 1850–1918-nen, edited by Yukio, Itō, 3–30. Kyoto: Mineruva Shobō, 2006.Google Scholar

Kokaze, Hidemasa 小風秀雅. “Kigyo kōsai to nairiku kōtsūmō no seibi: Seisaku kōsō wo chūshin ni” 起業公債事業と内陸交通網の整備: 政策構想を中心に [Public bonds and the development of an inland transportation network: Policy conception]. In Michi to kawa no kindai, edited by Naosuke, Takamura, 33–68. Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppansha, 1996.Google Scholar

Komiya, Kazuo 小宮一夫. Jōyaku kaisei to kokunai seiji 条約改正と国内政治 [Treaty revision and domestic politics]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 2001.Google Scholar

Koseki, Yūichirō 小関悠一郎. “Meikun” no kinsei: Gakumon, chishiki to hansei kaikaku 〈明君〉の近世: 学問・知識と藩政改革 [‘Benevolent lords’ in early modern Japan: Learning, knowledge and reform of domain government]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 2012.Google Scholar

Kramnick, Isaac. Bolingbroke and His Circle: The Politics of Nostalgia in the Age of Walpole. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Philip A. Origins of the Modern Chinese State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Philip A. Rebellion and Its Enemies in Late Imperial China: Militarization and Social Structure, 1796–1864. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Philip A. Soulstealers: The Chinese Sorcery Scare of 1768. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Kumazawa, Toru 熊澤徹. “Edo no shimogoe nesage undō to ryōryō sōdai” 江戸の下肥値下げ運動と領々惣代 [The movement to cut nightsoil prices in Edo and the representatives of an assembly of villages]. Shigaku zasshi 94, no. 4 (1985): 56–85.Google Scholar

Kurachi, Katsunao 倉地克直. Kinsei no minshū to shihai shisō 近世の民衆と支配思想 [The people and the ideology of rule in the early modern world]. Tokyo: Kashiwa Shobō, 1996.Google Scholar

Kurachi, Katsunao. Tokugawa shakai no yuragi 徳川社会のゆらぎ [The destabilization of Tokugawa society]. Nihon no rekishi 11. Tokyo: Shōgakkan, 2008.Google Scholar

Kurotaki, Jūjirō 黒瀧十二郎. Hirosaki hansei no shomondai 弘前藩政の諸問題 [Various issues of domain governance in Hirosaki]. Hirosaki: Hoppō Shinsha, 1997.Google Scholar

Kurushima, Hiroshi 久留島浩. “Hyakushō ikki to toshi sōjō” 百姓一揆と都市騒擾 [Peasant uprisings and urban riots]. In Iwanami kōza Nihon rekishi, Vol. 13, Kinsei (4), edited by Tōru, Ōtsu, Eiji, Sakurai, and Jōji, Fujii, 209–50. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2015.Google Scholar

Kurushima, Hiroshi. “Hyakushō to mura no henshitsu” 百姓と村の変質 [A transformation of the commoners and the village]. In Iwanami kōza Nihon tsūshi, Vol. 15, Kinsei (5), edited by Satoru, Fujita, Naohiro, Asao, Yoshihiko, Amino et al., 69–110. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1995.Google Scholar

Kurushima, Hiroshi. Kinsei bakuryō no gyōsei to kumiai mura 近世幕領の行政と組合村 [Administration and the associated villages in the early modern shogunal domains]. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai, 2002.Google Scholar

Lachman, Richard. “Greed and Contingency: State Fiscal Crises and Imperial Failure in Early Modern Europe.” American Journal of Sociology 115, no. 1 (July 2009): 39–73.Google Scholar

Lake, Peter. “Puritans, Popularity and Petitions: Local Politics in National Context, Cheshire, 1641.” In Politics, Religion and Popularity in Early Stuart Britain: Essays in Hornour of Conrad Russell, edited by Cogswell, Thomas, Cust, Richard, and Lake, Peter, 259–89. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Lambert, Sheila. Bills and Acts: Legislative Procedure in Eighteenth-Century England. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Langelüddecke, Henrik. “‘I finde all men & my officers all soe unwilling’: The Collection of Ship Money, 1635–1640.” Journal of British Studies 46, no. 3 (July 2007): 509–42.Google Scholar

Langelüddecke, Henrik. “Law and Order in Seventeenth-Century England: The Organization of Local Administration during the Personal Rule of Charles I.” Law and History Review 15, no. 1 (Spring 1997): 49–76.Google Scholar

Langelüddecke, Henrik. “‘Patchy and Spasmodic’: The Response of Justices of the Peace to Charles I’s Book of Orders.” English Historical Review 113, no. 454 (November 1998): 1231–48.Google Scholar

Langford, Paul. The Excise Crisis: Society and Politics in the Age of Walpole. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.Google Scholar

Langford, Paul. “Property and ‘Virtual Representation’ in Eighteenth-Century England.” Historical Journal 31, no. 1 (March 1988): 83–115.Google Scholar

Langford, Paul. Public Life and the Propertied Englishman, 1689–1798. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Lee, Daniel. Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Leung, Angela Ki Che [Liang Qizi] 梁其姿. Shishan yu jiaohua: Ming Qing de cishan zuzhi 施善與教化: 明清的慈善組織 [Charity and moral transformation: Philanthropic organizations in the Ming and Qing]. Taipei: Lianjing chuban shiye gongsi, 1997.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Levi, Margaret, Sacks, Audrey and Tyler, Tom, “Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs.” American Behavioral Scientist 53, no. 3 (November 2009): 354–75.Google Scholar

Li Dianrong. Qingchao jingkong zhidu yanjiu [A study of capital appeals in the Qing dynasty]. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe, 2011)Google Scholar

Li, Lillian M. Fighting Famine in North China: State, Market, and Environment Decline, 1690s–1990s. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Li, Lillian M. “Introduction: Food, Famine, and the Chinese State.” Journal of Asian Studies 41, no. 4 (August 1982): 687–707.Google Scholar

Li, Wenhai 李文海. “Wan Qing yizhen de xingqi yu fazhan” 晚清義賑的興起與發展 [The rise and development of charity relief in late Qing]. Qingshi yanjiu, no. 3 (1993): 27–35.Google Scholar

Lin, Huaguo 林华国. Yihetuan shishi kao 义和团史事考 [Research on the history of the Boxer Uprising]. Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe, 1993.Google Scholar

Lindley, Keith. Fenland Riots and the English Revolution. London: Heinemann Education Books, 1982.Google Scholar

Liu, Pujiang 刘浦江. “‘Wude zhongshi’ shuo zhi zhongjie” “五德终始”说之终结 [The end of the ‘Five Virtues’ theory]. Zhongguo shehui kexue, no. 2 (2006): 177–90.Google Scholar

Liu, Wenyuan 刘文远. Qingdai shuili jiexiang yanjiu 清代水利借项研究 [Water control and account debits in the Qing dynasty]. Xiamen: Xiamen daxue chubanshe, 2011.Google Scholar

Liu, William Guanglin. The Chinese Market Economy, 1000–1500. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Loft, Philip. “Involving the Public: Parliament, Petitioning, and the Language of Interest, 1688–1720.” Journal of British Studies 55, no. 1 (January 2016): 1–23.Google Scholar

Loft, Philip. “Petitioning and Petitioners to the Westminster Parliament, 1660–1788.” Parliamentary History 38, no. 3 (October, 2019): 342–61.Google Scholar

Loveman, Mara. “The Modern State and the Primitive Accumulation of Symbolic Power.” American Journal of Sociology 110, no. 6 (May 2005): 1651–83.Google Scholar

Lufrano, Richard John. Honorable Merchants: Commerce and Self-cultivation in Late Imperial China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Lustick, Ian S. “History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias.” American Political Science Review 90, no. 3 (September 1996): 605–18.Google Scholar

Ma, Junya 马俊亚. Beixisheng de “jubu”: Huaibei shehui shengtai bianqian yanjiu 被牺牲的“局部”: 淮北社会生态变迁研究(1680–1949) [The “part” sacrificed: Ecological change and Huaibei society]. Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe, 2011.Google Scholar

MacCulloch, Diarmaid. “Kett’s Rebellion in Context.” Past and Present, no. 84 (August 1979): 36–59.Google Scholar

MacCulloch, Diarmaid. Suffolk and the Tudors: Politics and Religion in an English County 1500–1600. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. B. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Maeda, Ryōsuke 前田亮介. Zenkoku seiji no shidō: Teikoku Gikai kaisetsugo no Meiji kokka 全国政治の始動: 帝国議会開設後の明治国家 [The beginnings of national politics in modern Japan: The Meiji state reform under the parliamentary system, 1890–1898]. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai, 2016.Google Scholar

Maeda, Tsutomu 前田勉. Edo kōki no shisō kūkan 江戶後期の思想空間 [The intellectual space of the later Edo period]. Tokyo: Perikansha, 2009.Google Scholar

Maeda, Tsutomu. Edo no dokushokai: Kaidoku no shisōshi 江戶の読書会: 会読の思想史 [Reading groups in Edo Japan: An intellectual history of seminar-style studying]. Tokyo: Heibonsha, 2012.Google Scholar

Maeda, Tsutomu. Heigaku to Shushigaku, Rangaku, Kokugaku: Kinsei Nihon shisōshi no kōzu 兵学と朱子学・蘭学・国学: 近世日本思想史の構図 [Military science and Neo-Confucianism, Dutch Learning, Nativist Learning: The composition of early modern Japanese intellectual history]. Tokyo: Heibonsha, 2006.Google Scholar

Makabe, Jin 真璧仁. Tokugawa kōki no gakumon to seiji: Shōheizaka Gakumonjo jusha to bakumatsu gaikō hen’yō 徳川後期の学問と政治: 昌平坂学問所儒者と幕末外交変容 [Late Tokugawa scholarship and politics: The transformation of Shōheizaka Academy scholars and late Tokugawa diplomacy]. Nagoya: Nagoya Daigaku Shuppankai, 2007.Google Scholar

Makihara, Norio 牧原憲夫. Kyakubun to kokumin no aida: Kindai minshū no seiji ishiki 客分と国民のあいだ: 近代民衆の政治意識 [Between subjects and citizens: The political awareness of early modern people]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1998.Google Scholar

Makihara, Norio. Meiji shichinen no daironsō: Kenpakusho kara mita kindai kokka to minshū 明治七年の大論争: 建白書から見た近代国家と民衆 [The great debates of Meiji 7 (1874): Modern state and people as seen from petitions]. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Hyōronsha, 1990.Google Scholar

Makihara, Norio. Minken to kenpō 民権と憲法 [People’s rights and the constitution]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2006.Google Scholar

Mandler, Peter. Aristocratic Government in the Age of Reform: Whigs and Liberals, 1830–1852. Oxford: Clarendon, 1990.Google Scholar

Mann, Michael. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms, and Results.” Archives of European Sociology 25, no. 2 (November 1984): 185–213.Google Scholar

Mann, Michael. The Sources of Social Power. Vol. 1, A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Mann, Michael. The Sources of Social Power. Vol. 2, The Rise of Classes and Nation-states, 1760–1914. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Mann, Susan. Local Merchants and the Chinese Bureaucracy, 1750–1950. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Manning, Roger B. Village Revolts: Social Protest and Popular Disturbances in England, 1509–1640. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.Google Scholar

Manship, Henry. The History of Great Yarmouth. London: London, J. R. Smith, 1854.Google Scholar

Mao, Haijian 茅海建. Wuxu bianfa shishikao戊戌變法史事考 [A detailed study of the historical facts of the Reforms of 1898]. Beijing: Sanlian shudian, 2005.Google Scholar

Marks, Robert. Tigers, Rice, Silk, and Silt: Environment and Economy in Late Imperial South China. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Marquez, Xavier. “The Irrelevance of Legitimacy.” Political Studies 64, no. 15 (2016): 19–34.Google Scholar

Martin, John E. Feudalism to Capitalism: Peasant and Landlord in English Agrarian Development. Rev. ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Maruyama, Yasunari 丸山雍成. Sankin kōtai 参勤交代 [Alternative attendance]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kō bunkan, 2007.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Shirō 松本四郎. Nihon kinsei toshiron 日本近世都市論 [Cities in early modern Japan]. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai, 1983.Google Scholar

Matsuo, Mieko 松尾美惠子. “Bakuhansei kaitaiki ni okeru kōgi-fushinyaku” 幕藩制解体期における公儀普請役 [Construction duties imposed by the shogunate in the period of the dissolution of the bakuhan system]. Tokugawa rinseishi kenkyū kiyō 53 (March 1980): 318–50.Google Scholar

Matsuo, Mieko. “Kinsei chūki ni okeru daimyo fushinyaku – Fuka hōhō ni kanren shite” 近世中期における大名普請役―賦課方法に関連して [Daimyo construction duties imposed by the shogunate in the middle Tokugawa period – Regarding the methods of levy]. Tokugawa rinseishi kenkyū kiyō 52 (March 1978): 369–98.Google Scholar

Matsuo, Mieko. “Kinsei kōki ni okeru daimyō jōnōkin: Kōgi fushinyaku no henyō” 近世後期における大名上納金: 公儀普請役の変容 [Daimyo monetary contributions to the shogunate in the latter part of the early modern period: The transformation of construction duties imposed by the shogunate]. Tokugawa rinseishi kenkyū kiyō 53 (March 1979): 404–35.Google Scholar

Matsuo, Mieko. “Otetsudai-fushin no henshitsu: ‘Okinotetsudai’ no seiritsu wo chūshin ni” 御手伝普請の変質: 「御金御手伝」の成立を中心に [The transformation of otetsudai-fushin: The establishment of ‘monetary otetsudai’]. Gakushūin shigaku, no. 10 (December 1973): 1–19.Google Scholar

Matsuzaki, Noriko 松崎範子. Kinsei jōkamachi no un’ei to chōnin 近世城下町の運営と町人 [The running of early modern castletowns and townspeople]. Osaka: Seibundo, 2012.Google Scholar

Matsuzawa, Yūsaku. Jiyū minken undō: “Demokurashii” no yume to zasetsu 自由民権運動: <デモクラシー>の夢と挫折 [The Freedom and People’s Rights Movement: The dream and the frustration of “democracy”]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2016.Google Scholar

McClain, James L., Merriman, John M. and Kaoru, Ugawa. Eds. Edo and Paris: Urban Life and the State in the Early Modern Era. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

McDowell, Nicholas. The English Radical Imagination: Culture, Religion, and Revolution, 1630–1660. Oxford: Clarendon, 2003.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Marjorie Keniston. “Local Responses to the Poor in Late Medieval and Tudor England.” Continuity and Change 3, no. 2 (August 1988): 209–45.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Marjorie Keniston. Poor Relief in England, 1350–1600. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Marjorie Keniston. “Poverty, Charity, and Coercion in Elizabethan England.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 35, no. 3 (Winter 2005): 457–79.Google Scholar

Migdal, Joel S. State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Mikami, Kazuo 三上一夫. Kōbu gattairon no kenkyū: Echizen han bakumatsu-ishinshi bunseki 公武合体論の研究: 越前藩幕末維新史分析 [A study of the efforts to unify the court and shogun: An analysis of the history of Echizen in late Tokugawa and early Meiji]. Rev. ed. Tokyo: Ochanomizu Shobō, 1990.Google Scholar

Mikuriya, Takashi 御厨貴. “Chihō seido kaikaku to minken undo no tenkai” 地方制度改革と民権運動の展開 [Reforms to local institutions and the development of the People’s Rights Movement]. In Meijishi ronshu: Kaku koto to yomu koto, 119–76. Tokyo: Yoshida Shoten, 2017.Google Scholar

Mikuriya, Takashi. Meiji kokka keisei to chihō keisei: 1881–1890 明治国家形成と地方経営: 1881–1890年 [The formation of the Meiji state and local management: 1881–1890]. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai, 1980.Google Scholar

Miliband, Ralph. The State in Capitalist Society. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1969.Google Scholar

Mitani, Hiroshi 三谷博. Ishinshi saikō: Kōgi ōsei kara shūken datsu mibunka e 維新史再考: 公議・王政から集権・脱身分化へ [Rethinking the history of the Restoration: From public authority and imperial rule to centralization and the removal of status]. Tokyo: NKH Shuppan, 2017.Google Scholar

Mitani, Hiroshi. Meiji Ishin to nashonarizumu: Bakumatsu no gaikō to seiji hendō 明治維新とナショナリズム: 幕末の外交と政治変動 [The Meiji Restoration and nationalism: Late Tokugawa diplomacy and political change]. Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppansha, 1997.Google Scholar

Miyake, Masahiro 三宅正浩. “Bakuhan seiji chitsujo no seiritsu” 幕藩政治秩序の成立 [The establishment of the bakuhan political order]. Nihonshi kenkyū, no. 582 (February 2011): 59–83.Google Scholar

Miyamoto, Matao 宮本又郎. “Quantitative Aspects of Tokugawa Economy.” In The Economic History of Japan: 1600–1990, Vol. 1, Emergence of Economic Society in Japan, 1600–1859, edited by Hayami, Akira, Hayami, Osamu Saito, and Toby, Ronald P., 79–81. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Miyazaki, Ichisada 宮崎市定. Tōyōteki kinsei 東洋的近世 [East Asian early modernity]. Tokyo: Kyuiku Taimususha, 1950.Google Scholar

Miyazawa, Seiichi 宮澤誠一. “Bakuhansei ideorogi no seiritsu to kōzō: Shoki hansei kaikaku to no kanren o chūshin ni” 幕藩制イデオロギーの成立と構造: 初期藩政改革との関連を中心に [The establishment and structure of the ideology of the bakuhan system: Connections with the early period of reforms to domain governance]. In Tenbō Nihon rekishi, Vol. 16, Kinsei no shisō bunka, edited by Michio, Aoki and Masaki, Wakao, 70–84. Tokyo: Tōkyōdō Shuppan, 2002.Google Scholar

Mizubayashi, Takeshi 水林彪. Hōkensei no saihen to Nihonteki shakai no kakuritsu 封建制の再編と日本的社会の確立 [The reorganization of the feudal system and the establishment of Japanese society]. Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppansha, 1987.Google Scholar

Mizumoto, Kunihiko 水本邦彦. “Doshadome yakunin to nōmin” 土砂留役人と農民 [Officials in charge of halting siltage and farmers]. Shirin 64, no. 5 (September 1981): 1–49.Google Scholar

Mokros, Emily. The Peking Gazette in Late Imperial China: State News and Political Authority. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Monod, Paul K. Jacobitism and the English People, 1688–1788. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Morgan, Edmund S. Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1989.Google Scholar

Morita, Akira 森田明. Shindai no suiri to chiiki shakai 清代の水利と地域社会 [River work and local society in Qing China]. Fukuoka: Chūgoku Shoten, 2002.Google Scholar

Morrill, John. “The Religious Context of the English Civil War.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 34 (1984): 155–78.Google Scholar

Murata, Michihito 村田路人. Kinsei kōiki shihai no kenkyū 近世広域支配の研究 [A study of early modern interregional administration]. Suita: Ōsaka Daigaku Shuppankai, 1995.Google Scholar

Murata, Michihito. Kinsei no Yodogawa chisui 近世の淀川治水 [Water control on the Yodo river in the early modern era]. Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppansha, 2009.Google Scholar

Murata, Michihito. “Yoshimune no seiji” 吉宗の政治 [The politics of Yoshimune]. In Iwanami kōza Nihon rekishi, Vol. 12, Kinsei (3), edited by Tōru, Ōtsu, Eiji, Sakurai, and Joōji, Fujii, 1–34. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 2014.Google Scholar

Naitō, Seichū 內藤正中. Jiyū minken undō no kenkyū: Kokkai kaisetsu undō o chūshin to shite 自由民権運動の研究: 国会開設運動を中心として [Studies of the Freedom and People’s Rights Movement: The establishment of a national assembly]. Tokyo: Aoki Shoten, 1964.Google Scholar

Najita, Tetsuo. Visions of Virtue in Tokugawa Japan: The Kaitokudō Merchant Academy of Osaka. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Nakamoto, Takatoshi 中元崇智. “Kurihara Ryōichi to Jiyūtō ‘Tosaha’ no ‘tsūshō kokka kōsō’” 栗原亮一と自由党「土佐派」の「通商国家構想」 [Kurihara Ryōichi and the ‘vision of a trading state’ of the Liberal Party’s ‘Tosa School’], Nihonshi kenkyū, no. 516 (August 2005): 28–52.Google Scholar

Nakamura, Akihiko 中村彰彦. Hoshina Masayuki: Tokugawa shōgunke wo sasaeta Aizu hanshu 保科正之: 徳川将軍家を支えた会津藩主 [Hoshina Masayuki: The lord of Aizu domain who supported the Tokugawa House]. Tokyo: Chūō Kōronsha, 1995.Google Scholar

Nanba, Nobuo 難波信雄. “Kansei no kaikaku: Sendai han wo sozai toshite” 寛政の改革―仙台藩を素材として [The Kansei reforms: A case study of Sendai domain]. In Hōreki Tenmeiki no seiji to shakai, Vol. 5, Kōza Nihon kinseishi, edited by Tadao, Yamada and Shirō, Matsumoto, 237–80. Tokyo: Yūhikaku, 1988.Google Scholar

Naquin, Susan, and Rawski, Evelyn S.. Chinese Society in the Eighteenth Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Nara, Katsuji 奈良勝司. Meiji Ishin to sekai ninshiki taikei: Bakumatsu no Tokugawa Seiken: Shingi to seii no aida 明治維新と世界認識体系: 幕末の徳川政権: 信義と征夷のあいだ [The Meiji Restoration and worldview systems: Tokugawa administration in the bakumatsu era and the space between faith and foreign conquest]. Tokyo: Yūshisha, 2010.Google Scholar

Nishida, Masaki 西田真樹. “Kawayoke to kuniyaku-fushin” 川除と国役普請 [River control and kuniyaku-fushin]. In Kōza Nihon gijutsu no shakaishi, Vol. 6, Doboku, edited by Keiji, Yamaguchi, Keiji, Nagahara, Ken, Amakasu et al., 227–60. Tokyo: Nihon Hyōronsha, 1984.Google Scholar

Nishikawa, Makoto 西川誠. “Meiji reinendai no chihō keiei ni kansuru oboegaki” 明治零年代の地方経営に関する覚書 [Memoranda regarding local governance in the first decade of the Meiji era]. In Nihon kindaishi no saikōchiku, edited by Takashi, Itō, 77–102. Tokyo: Yamakawa Shuppansha, 1993.Google Scholar

Nogami, Taira 野上平. Mito han nōson no kenkyū 水戶藩農村の研究 [A study of villages in Mito domain]. Tokyo: Fūtōsha, 1997.Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar

Ōba, Osamu. Books and Boats: Sino-Japanese Relations in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. Translated by Joshua A. Fogel. Portland, ME.: Merwin Asia, 2012.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Kevin J. “Rightful Resistance.” World Politics 49, no. 1 (October 1996): 31–55.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Kevin J., and Li, Lianjiang, Rightful Resistance in Rural China. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

O’Brien, Patrick K., and Hunt, Philip A., “England, 1485–1815.” In The Rise of the Fiscal State in Europe, 1200–1815, edited by Bonney, Richard, 53–100. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Ocko, Jonathan K. “I’ll Take It All the Way to Beijing: Capital Appeals in the Qing.” Journal of Asian Studies 47, no. 2 (May 1988): 291–315.Google Scholar

Offe, Claus. Contradictions of the Welfare State, edited by Keane, John. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Ogata, Isamu 尾形勇. Chūgoku kodai no “ie” to kokka: Kōtei shihaika no chitsujo kōzō 中国古代の「家」と国家: 皇帝支配下の秩序構造 [“Family” and state in ancient China: A historical study of the structure of imperial rule]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1979.Google Scholar

Ogawa, Kazunari 小川和也. Bokumin no shisō: Edo no chisha ishiki 牧民の思想: 江戶の治者意識 [The concept of “shepherding the people”: Consciousness of rule in Edo]. Tokyo: Heibonsha, 2008.Google Scholar

Ogawara, Masamichi 小川原正道. Seinan sensō to jiyū minken 西南戦争と自由民権 [The Satsuma Rebellion and Freedom and People’s Rights]. Tokyo: Keiō Gijuku Daigaku Shuppankai, 2017.Google Scholar

Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “‘Whatever Is, Is Right’? Economic Institutions in Pre-industrial Europe.” Economic History Review 60, no. 4 (2007): 649–84.Google Scholar

Ōguchi, Yūjirō 大口勇次郎. “Bakufu no zaisei” 幕府の財政 [The public finance of the shogunate]. In Iwanami Nihon keizaishi, Vol. 2, Kindai seichō no taidō, edited by Hiroshi, Shinbo and Osamu, Saitō, 127–71. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1989.Google Scholar

Ōguchi, Yūjirō. “Kansei-Bunkaki no bakufu zaisei” 寛政—文化期の幕府財政 [The public finance of the shogunate between 1789 and 1817]. In Nihon kinseishi ronsō, Vol. 2, edited by Bitō Masahide Sensei Kanreki-kinenkai, 207–52. Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kōbunkan, 1984.Google Scholar

Ōhira, Yūichi 大平祐一. “Kinsei no daimyō ‘kōmu’ to so no hōkai: Bakumatsu no ‘otetsudai’ ‘jōnōkin’ wo tegakari ni shite” 近世の大名『公務』とその崩壊 ―― 幕末の『御手伝』『上納金』を手がかりにして [The “official duties” of the early modern daimyo and their dissolution: Otetsudai and monetary contributions to the shogunate in the late Tokugawa]. Hōgaku 48, no. 6 (February 1985): 96–156.Google Scholar

Ōhira, Yūichi. Kinsei no higōhōteki soshō 近世の非合法的訴訟 [Early modern illegal lawsuits]. Tokyo: Sōbunsha, 2011.Google Scholar

Okamoto, Takashi 岡本隆司. Zokkoku to jishu no aida: Kindai Shin-Kan kankei to Higashi Ajia no meiun 属国と自主のあいだ: 近代淸韓関係と東アジアの命運 [Between dependency and autonomy: Early modern Sino-Korean relations and the fate of East Asia]. Nagoya: Nagoya Daigaku Shuppankai, 2004.Google Scholar

Ōkubo, Takeharu 大久保健晴. Kindai Nihon no seiji kōsō to Oranda 近代日本の政治構想とオランダ [The early modern Japanese conception of politics and Holland]. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai, 2010.Google Scholar

Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Ooms, Herman. Tokugawa Village Practice: Class, Status, Power, and Law. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Orbach, Danny. “‘By Not Stopping’: The First Taiwan Expedition (1874) and the Roots of Japanese Military Disobedience.” Journal of Japanese Studies 42, no. 1 (Winter 2016): 29–55.Google Scholar

Ōshima, Mitsuko 大島美津子. Meiji kokka to chiiki shakai 明治国家と地域社会 [The Meiji state and local society]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1994.Google Scholar

Ōtani, Sadao 大谷貞夫. Edo bakufu chisui seisakushi no kenkyū 江戶幕府治水政策史の研究 [A study of the history of the Tokugawa shogunate’s water-control policy]. Tokyo: Yūzankaku Shuppan, 1996.Google Scholar

Ōtani, Sadao. Kinsei Nihon chisuishi no kenkyū 近世日本治水史の研究 [Studies on the history of water control in Tokugawa Japan]. Tokyo: Yūzankaku Shuppan, 1986.Google Scholar

Ōtomo, Kazuo 大友一雄. “Kyōhōki gōson chokoku seisaku no seiritsu katei” 享保期郷村貯穀政策の成立過程 [The making of rural granary policy during the Kyōhō reign (1716–1736)]. Kokushigaku, no. 118 (November 1982): 40–57.Google Scholar

Ōtsuka, Eiji 大塚英一. “Okura, gōkura ni miru kinsei shakai no kōzō” 御蔵・郷蔵に見る近世社会の構造 [The structure of early modern society as seen from the granaries managed by domain governments and granaries managed by villagers]. In Atarashii kinseishi, Vol. 4, Sonraku no henyō to chiiki shakai, edited by Hisashi, Watanabe, 125–66. Tokyo: Shinjinbutsu Ōraisha, 1996.Google Scholar

Outhwaite, R. B. “Dearth and Government Intervention in English Grain Markets, 1590–1700.” Economic History Review, New Series 34, no. 3 (August 1981): 389–406.Google Scholar

Outhwaite, R. B. Dearth, Public Policy and Social Disturbance in England, 1550–1800. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Outhwaite, R. B. “Dearth, the English Crown and the ‘Crisis of the 1590s’.” In The European Crisis of the 1590s: Essays in Contemporary History, edited by Clark, Peter, 23–43. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1985.Google Scholar

Parry, Jonathan P. The Politics of Patriotism: English Liberalism, National Identity and Europe, 1830–1886. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Parssinen, T. M. “Association, Convention and Anti-Parliament in British Radical Politics, 1771–1848.” English Historical Review 88, no. 348 (July 1973): 504–33.Google Scholar

Patterson, Catherine F. Urban Patronage in Early Modern England: Corporate Boroughs, the Landed Elite, and the Crown, 1580–1640. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Peacey, Jason. Print and Public Politics in the English Revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Peng, Yuxin 彭雨新. “Qingdai tianfu qiyun cunliu zhidu de yanjin” 清代田赋起运存留制度的演进 [The development of the system of land tax retention and transportation in the Qing dynasty]. Zhongguo jingjishi yanjiu, no. 4 (1992): 124–33.Google Scholar

Pennington, Kenneth. The Prince and the Law, 1200–1600: Sovereignty and Rights in the Western Legal Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Perdue, Peter C. China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Perdue, Peter C. Exhausting the Earth: State and Peasant in Hunan, 1500–1850. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies of Harvard University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Perry, Elizabeth J. “Popular Protest: Playing by the Rules.” In China Today, China Tomorrow: Domestic Politics, Economy, and Society, edited by Fewsmith, Joseph, 11–28. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2011.Google Scholar

Pettigrew, William. “Constitutional Change in England and the Diffusion of Regulatory Initiative, 1660–1714.” History 99, no. 338 (December 2014): 839–63.Google Scholar

Philp, Mark. “Talking about Democracy: Britain in the 1790s.” In Re-Imaging Democracy in the Age of Revolutions: America, France, Britain, Ireland, 1750–1850, edited by Innes, Joanna and Philp, Mark, 101–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Philips, John A. “Popular Politics in Unreformed England.” Journal of Modern History 52, no. 4 (December 1980): 599–625.Google Scholar

Pietz, David A. The Yellow River: The Problems of Water in Modern China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Pincus, Steven and Robinson, James. “Challenging the Fiscal-Military Hegemony: The British Case.” In The British Fiscal-Military States, 1660–c.1783, edited by Graham, Aaron and Walsh, Patrick, 229–61. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Platt, Brian. Burning and Building: Schooling and State Formation in Japan, 1750–1890. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2004.Google Scholar

Poggi, Gianfranco. The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Poole, Robert. “French Revolution or Peasants’ Revolt? Petitioners and Rebels in England from the Blanketeers to the Chartists.” Labour History Review 74, no. 1 (April 2009): 6–26.Google Scholar

Poole, Robert. “Petitioners and Rebels: Petitioning for Parliamentary Reform in Regency England.” Social Science History 43, no. 3 (Fall 2019): 553–79.Google Scholar

Poole, Steve. The Politics of Regicide in England, 1760–1850: Troublesome Subjects. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Poole, Steve. “Scarcity and the Civic Tradition: Market Management in Bristol, 1709–1815.” In Markets, Market Culture and Popular Protest in Eighteenth-Century Britain and Ireland, edited by Randall, Adrian and Charlesworth, Andrew, 91–114. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Pound, John. Poverty and Vagrancy in Tudor England. 2nd edition. London: Longman, 1986.Google Scholar

Power, M. J. “London and the Control of the ‘Crisis’ of the 1590s.” History 70, no. 230 (October 1985): 371–85.Google Scholar

Qingyuan, Wei 韦庆远, Fang, Gao 高放, and Wenyuan, Liu 刘文源. Qingmo xianzhengshi 清末宪政史 [Late Qing constitutional history]. Beijing: Zhongguo renmin daxue chubanshe, 1993.Google Scholar

Quintrell, B. W. “The Making of Charles I’s Book of Orders.” English Historical Review 95, no. 376 (July 1980): 553–72.Google Scholar

Randall, Adrian. Riotous Assemblies: Popular Protest in Hanoverian England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Rankin, Mary B. Elite Activism and Political Transformation in China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Ravina, Mark. “Confucian Banking: The Community Granary (Shasō) in Rhetoric and Practice.” In Economic Thought in Early Modern Japan, edited by Gramlich-Oka, Bettina and Smits, Gregory J., 179–204. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar

Ravina, Mark. Land and Lordship in Early Modern Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Ravina, Mark. To Stand with the Nations of the World: Japan’s Meiji Restoration in World History. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Rawski, Evelyn S. Education and Popular Literacy in Ch’ing China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Reitan, E. A. “The Civil List in Eighteenth-Century British Politics: Parliamentary Supremacy versus the Independence of the Crown,” Historical Journal 9, no. 3 (1966): 318–37.Google Scholar

Riley, Dylan. The Civic Foundations of Fascism in Europe: Italy, Spain, and Romania, 1870–1945. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Roberts, Luke S. Mercantilism in a Japanese Domain: The Merchant Origins of Economic Nationalism in 18th-century Tosa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Roberts, Luke S. Performing the Great Peace: Political Space and Open Secrets in Tokugawa Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Rogers, Nicholas. Crowds, Culture, and Politics in Georgian Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Rogers, Nicholas. “Popular Protest in Early Hanoverian London.” Past and Present, no. 79 (May 1978): 70–100.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent. The Fruits of Revolution: Property Rights, Litigation, and French Agriculture, 1700–1860. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent. “The Political Economy of Absolutism Reconsidered.” In Bates, Robert H., Grief, Avner, Levi, Margaret et al., Analytic Narratives, 63–108. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Rothstein, Bo. “Creating Political Legitimacy: Electoral Democracy versus Quality of Government.” American Behavioral Scientist 53, no. 3 (November 2009): 311–30.Google Scholar

Rowe, William T. Hankow: Conflict and Community in a Chinese City, 1796–1895. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Rowe, William T. “The Public Sphere in Modern China.” Modern China 16, no. 3 (July 1990): 309–29.Google Scholar

Rowe, William T. “Water Control and the Qing Political Process: The Fankou Dam Controversy.” Modern China 14, no. 4 (October 1988): 353–87.Google Scholar

Rubin, Jared. Rulers, Religion, and Riches: Why the West Got Rich and the Middle East Did Not. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Rubinger, Richard. Popular Literacy in Early Modern Japan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Rudé, George. The Crowd in History: A Study of Popular Disturbances in France and England, 1730–1848. Rev. ed. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1981.Google Scholar

Rudé, George. Wilkes and Liberty: A Social Study of 1763 to 1774. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Russell, Conrad. The Causes of the English Civil War. Oxford: Clarendon, 1990.Google Scholar

Russell, Conrad. The Fall of the British Monarchies, 1637–1642. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991.Google Scholar

Sacks, David Harris. “The Corporate Town and the English State: Bristol’s ‘Little Businesses’ 1625–1641.” In The Tudor and Stuart Town: A Reader in English Urban History, 1530–1688, edited by Barry, Jonathan, 297–333. London: Longman, 1990.Google Scholar

Sacks, David Harris. “The Paradox of Taxation: Fiscal Crises, Parliament, and Liberty in England, 1450–1640.” In Fiscal Crises, Liberty, and Representative Government, 1450–1789, edited by Hoffman, Philip T. and Norberg, Kathryn, 7–66. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Saitō, Yoshiyuki 斎藤善之. Utsumibune to bakuhansei shijō no kaitai 内海船と幕藩制市場の解体[Inland water transport and the collapse of the shogunate-daimyo market system]. Tokyo: Kashiwa Shobō, 1994.Google Scholar

Sakamoto, Tadahisa 坂本忠久. Kinsei kōki toshi seisaku no kenkyū 近世後期都市政策の硏究 [Urban policy in the later early modern period]. Suita: Ōsaka Daigaku Shuppankai, 2003.Google Scholar

Satō, Kimihiko 佐藤公彦. Giwadan no kigen to sono undo: Chūgoku minshū nashonarizum no tanjō 義和団の起源とその運動: 中国民衆ナショナリズムの誕生 [Origins of the Boxer Movement: The rise of Chinese popular nationalism]. Tokyo: Kenbun Shuppan, 1999.Google Scholar

Saunders, Robert. “Chartism from Above: British Elites and the Interpretation of Chartism.” Historical Research 8, no. 213 (2007): 463–84.Google Scholar

Saunders, Robert. “Democracy.” In Languages of Politics in Nineteenth-Century Britain, edited by Craig, D. and Thompson, J., 142–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar

Scheiner, Irwin. “Benevolent Lords and Honorable Peasants: Rebellion and Peasant Consciousness in Tokugawa Japan.” In Japanese Thought in the Tokugawa Period, 1600–1868, edited by Najita, Tetsuo and Scheiner, Irwin, 39–62. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Schofield, Roger. Taxation under the Early Tudors, 1485–1547. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar

Schoppa, R. Keith. “Dike Building and Repair in the Three-River Microregion, 1686–1926: Patterns in Practical Governance.” In Dragons, Tigers, and Dogs: Qing Crisis Management and the Boundaries of State Power in Late Imperial China, edited by Antony, Robert J. and Leonard, Jane Kate, 129–53. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University East Asia Program, 2002.Google Scholar

Schoppa, R. Keith. “Power, Legitimacy, and Symbol: Local Elites and the Jute Creek Embankment Case.” In Chinese Local Elites and Patterns of Dominance, edited by Esherick, Joseph W. and Rankin, Mary B., 140–61. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Scott, James C. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Scott, James C. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Scott, James C. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Senda, Minoru 千田稔. “Ishin seiken no chihō zaigyōsei seisaku” 維新政権の地方財行政政策 [On the local policy of the Ishin government]. Shigaku zasshi 85, no. 10 (September 1976): 42–71.Google Scholar

Shagan, Ethan H. Popular Politics and the English Reformation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Shagan, Ethan H. “Protector Somerset and the 1549 Rebellions: New Sources and New Perspectives.” English Historical Review 114, no. 455 (February 1999): 34–63.Google Scholar

Sharp, Buchanan. Famine and Scarcity in Late Medieval and Early Modern England: The Regulation of Grain Marketing, 1256–1631. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Sharp, Buchanan. In Contempt of All Authority: Rural Artisans and Riot in the West of England, 1586–1660. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Sharpe, J. A. Crime in Early Modern England, 1550–1750. 2nd ed. London: Longman Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Sharpe, Kevin. The Personal Rule of Charles I. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Shiode, Hiroyuki 塩出浩之. “Taiwan shuppei wo meguru Higashi Ajia no kōron kūkan” 台湾出兵をめぐる東アジアの公論空間 [The East Asian space of public debate regarding the expedition to Taiwan]. In Kōron to kōsai no Higashi Ajia kindai, edited by Hiroyuki, Shiode, 167–206. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai, 2016.Google Scholar

Shizuoka-ken Minken Hyakunen Jikkō Iinkai 静岡県民権百年実行委員会. Ed. Shizuoka-ken jiyū minken shiryōshū 静岡県自由民権史料集 [Compilation of historical materials on Freedom and People’s Rights in Shizuoka Prefecture]. Tokyo: San’ichi Shobō, 1984.Google Scholar

Shōji, Kichinosuke 庄司吉之助. Yonaoshi ikki no kenkyū 世直し一揆の研究 [Studies on world-renewal uprisings]. Tokyo: Azekura Shobō, 1975.Google Scholar

Sippel, Patricia. “Chisui: Creating a Sacred Domain in Early Modern and Modern Japan.” In Public Spheres, Private Lives in Modern Japan, 1600–1950, edited by Bernstein, Gail Lee, Gordon, Andrew, and Nakai, Kate Wildman, 155–84. Cambridge, MA: The Harvard University Asia Center, 2005.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought. Vol. 2, The Age of Reformation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “From the State of Princes to the Person of the State.” In Visions of Politics, Vol. 2, Renaissance Virtues, 368–413. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “A Genealogy of the Modern State.” Proceedings of the British Academy, no. 162 (2009): 325–70.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “Humanism, Scholasticism and Popular Sovereignty.” In Visions of Politics, Vol. 2, Renaissance Virtues, 245–63. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “Republican Virtues in an Age of Princes.” In Visions of Politics, Vol. 2, Renaissance Virtues, 118–59. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “The State.” In Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, edited by Ball, Terence, Farr, James, and Hanson, Russell L., 90–131. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda. “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Bringing the State Back In, edited by Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, 3–38. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Skocpol, Theda. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Slack, Paul. “Books of Orders: The Making of English Social Policy, 1577–1631.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 30 (February 1979): 1–22.Google Scholar

Slack, Paul. “Dearth and Social Policy in Early Modern England.” Social History of Medicine 5, no. 1 (April 1992): 1–17.Google Scholar

Slack, Paul. The English Poor Law, 1531–1782. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Slack, Paul. From Reformation to Improvement: Public Welfare in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Slack, Paul. The Impact of Plague in Tudor and Stuart England. Oxford: Clarendon, 1985.Google Scholar

Slack, Paul. Poverty and Policy in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman, 1988.Google Scholar

Slack, Paul. “Poverty and Social Regulation in Elizabethan England.” In The Reign of Elizabeth I, edited by Haigh, Christopher, 221–41. London: MacMillan, 1984.Google Scholar