Introduction

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107707221.001

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2016

Martin J. Packer and

Edited by

Martin J. Packer and

Michael A. Evans: Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Martin J. Packer: Affiliation:
University of the Andes in Bogotá, Colombia
R. Keith Sawyer: Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Michael A. Evans: Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Martin J. Packer: Affiliation:
Universidad de los Andes, Colombia
R. Keith Sawyer: Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The learning sciences (LS) is positioned as an interdisciplinary approach to the study of how children and adults learn. Generally working outside of a laboratory setting, learning scientists attempt to conduct research in authentic settings to test iteratively designs for new learning environments that results in theoretical insights as well as instructional improvements. The focus of LS research has progressed beyond a sole emphasis on individual cognition to include social and cultural considerations as well as the role of the environments in which learning takes place. LS is marked by collaborations among instructional technologists, educational psychologists, content area educators, anthropologists, computer scientists, linguists, philosophers, and many more. LS is, then, an interdisciplinary approach to the study and facilitation of learning in authentic settings.

The first LS program was formed at Northwestern University in 1991 – so the field will have existed close to a quarter century as this book goes to press. Yet, in all of this time, no book has been published that analyzes “learning sciences” itself. There are now LS programs in at least thirty-five US universities and in several countries around the world, and new programs are being created as we write. Two journals dedicated to LS have been founded (The Journal of the Learning Sciences and The International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning), and an international association, the International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS), holds annual meetings. An original focus on classroom learning has been supplemented by a growing interest in learning in “informal settings” such as museums, after-school programs, and the home. At the same time, LS is having an increasing impact on policy in areas such as mathematics (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics), science (National Science Education Standards), and engineering education (The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century). In addition, LS has been changing in important ways over the course of its existence and continues to do so. This book is the first to document, explore, and extrapolate from these characteristics of LS.

It is true that articles have appeared that reflect on the history of LS as a whole and of the Journal of the Learning Sciences in particular (e.g., Kirby, Hoadley, & Carr-Chellman, 2005; Kolodner, 2004). In addition, two editions of a massive Handbook have summarized the state of the art (Sawyer, 2006, 2014).

Type: Chapter
Information: Reflections on the Learning Sciences , pp. 1 - 16

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707221.001 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Evans, M. A., Packer, M., Stevens, R., Maddox, C., Sawyer, K., & Larreamendy, J. (2010). The learning sciences as a setting for learning. In Proceedings of International Conference of Learning Sciences (pp. 53–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kirby, J. A., Hoadley, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2005). Instructional systems design and the learning sciences: A citation analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), 37–47.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kolodner, J. L. (2004). The learning sciences: Past, present, and future. Educational Technology: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 44(3), 37–42.Google Scholar

Koschmann, T. (2003). CSCL, argumentation, and Deweyan inquiry. In Arguing to learn (pp. 261–269). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar

Koschmann, T. D. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Libert, B., Spector, J., & Tapscott, D. (2007). We are smarter than me: How to unleash the power of crowds in your business. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Nathan, M. J., & Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Foundations of learning sciences. In Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2nd ed. (pp. 21–43).New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.CrossRef Google Scholar

Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995, January). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Book contents

1 - Introduction

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive