Aristotle (1961). Aristotle’s Physics with an Analytical Index of Technical Terms. Trans. Richard Hope. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Beadle, R. & Moore, G. (2011). MacIntyre, neo-Aristotelianism and Organization Theory. In Tsoukas, H. & Chia, R. (eds.), Philosophy and Organization Theory Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 32, pp. 85–121). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J. (2002). The Constellation of Hermeneutics, Critical Theory and Deconstruction. In Dostal, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bogen, J. (2005). Teleological Explanation. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed., p. 911). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brittan, G. G. J. (1999). Enlightenment. In Audi, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (p. 266). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brough, J. B. (1977). The Emergence of an Absolute Consciousness in Husserl’s Early Writings on Time-Consciousness. In Elliston, F. A. & McCormick, P. (eds.), Husserl: Expositions and Appraisals. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Butler, T. (1998). Towards a hermeneutic method for interpretive research in information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 13(4), 285–300.Google Scholar

Costello, G. J. (2017). Phenomenological realism: A pragmatic lens for information systems research. Systems, Signs & Actions SYSIAC (An International Journal on Information Technology, Action, Communication and Workpractices), 10(1), 34–53. Available at: https://sysiac.org/?pageId=45Google Scholar

Critchley, S. (2001). Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

D’Costa, G. (2017). Supersessionism: Harsh, Mild or Gone for Good? European Judaism: A Journal for the New Europe, 50(1), 99–107.Google Scholar

Daintith, J. & Gjertsen, D. (eds.) (1999). Oxford Dictionary of Scientists (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dante (1984 translation). The Divine Comedy, Volume 1: Inferno by Dante Aligheri. Trans. Mark Musa. New York: Penguin ClassicsGoogle Scholar

Davison, R. M. & Martinsons, M. G. (2011). Methodological practice and policy for organisationally and socially relevant IS research: An inclusive–exclusive perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 26, 288–93.Google Scholar

Dobson, P. & Love, P. (2004). Realist and postmodernist perspectives on information systems research: Points of connection. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 12(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v3112i3121.3107Google Scholar

Dostal, R. J. (2002). Introduction. In Dostal, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowie, R. S. (2005). Burke, Edmund. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dube, L. & Pare, G. (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 597–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fish, S. (1990). Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary & Legal Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Trans. Stephen Sampson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case Study. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (4th ed., pp. 301–16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B. (2018). What is Phronesis and Phronetic Social Science? Available at: https://linkedin.com/pulse/what-phronesis-phronetic-social-science-bent-flyvbjerg-%E5%82%85%E4%BB%A5%E6%96%8C-/. Accessed February 2022.Google Scholar

Fotion, N. (2005). Logical Positivism. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gregory, B. S. (2012). The Unintended Reformation: How a Religious Revolution Secularized Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, E. (2018). Aristotle’s Way: How Ancient Wisdom Can Change Your Life. London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Trans. John Macquarrie & Edward Robinson. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology. In The Question Concerning Technology: And Other Essays (pp. 3–35). New York & London: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar

Inwood, M. J. (2005a). Enlightenment. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 252–3). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Inwood, M. J. (2005b). Gadamer, Hans Georg. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jancar, B. (1966). The Philosophy of Aristotle. New York: Monarch Press.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (1979). Sensation and Consciousness in Aristotle’s Psychology. In Barnes, J., Schofield, M., & Sorabji, R. (eds.), Articles on Aristotle. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. (2010). A New History of Western Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kinsella, E. A. (2012). Practitioner Reflection and Judgement as Phronesis. In Kinsella, E. A. & Pitman, A. (eds.), Phronesis as Professional Knowledge: Practical Wisdom in the Professions. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Kinsella, E. A. & Pitman, A. (eds.) (2012). Phronesis as Professional Knowledge: Practical Wisdom in the Professions. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar

Klein, H. K. & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kock, N., Avison, D. & Malaurent, J. (2017). Positivist information systems action research: Methodological issues. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(3), 754–67. DOI: 710.1080/07421222.07422017.01373007.Google Scholar

Lacy, A. (2005). Positivism. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lawlor, L. & Moulard-Leonard, V. (2021). Henri Bergson. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 ed.). Available at: <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/bergson/>. Accessed January 2022..+Accessed+January+2022.>Google Scholar

Lawrence, F. (2002). Gadamer, the Hermeneutic Revolution, and Theology. In Dostal, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, A. (1989). A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly, March, 33–50.Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. (2005). Time. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 919–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, A. C. (2002). A Short History of Ethics: A History of Moral Philosophy from the Homeric Age to the 20th Century. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, A. C. (2006). Edith Stein: A Philosophical Prologue, 1913–1922. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, A. C. (2007). After Virtue (3rd ed.). Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Malpas, J. (2018). Hans-Georg Gadamer. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 ed.). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/gadamer/. Accessed February 2022.Google Scholar

Mingers, J. (2004). Real-izing information systems: Critical realism as an underpinning philosophy for information systems. Information and Organization, 14, 87–103.Google Scholar

Mingers, J., Mutch, A., & Willcocks, L. (2013). Critical realism in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 795–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moran, D. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Moran, D. (2005). Edmund Husserl: Founder of Phenomenology. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar

Moran, D. & Cohen, J. (2012). The Husserl Dictionary. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Murphy, M. C. (ed.) (2003). Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myers, M. D. (2022). Qualitative Research in Information Systems. Available at: https://qual.auckland.ac.nz/. Accessed February 2022.Google Scholar

ODE. (2006). Aristotle. In Oxford Dictionary of English (Rev. 2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

ODS. (1999). Aristotle. In Daintith, J. & Gjertsen, D. (eds), Oxford Dictionary of Scientists (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Priest, S. (2005). Transcendence. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Randall, J. H. (1961). Foreword. In Aristotle’s Physics with an Analytical Index of Technical Terms. Trans. Richard Hope. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Ruse, M. (2005). Comte, Isidore Auguste Marie Francois Xavier. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Augustine, Saint. (1961). Confessions. Trans. R. S. Pine-Coffin. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Soulen, R. K. (1996). The God of Israel and Christian Theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. C. W. (2005). Phronēsis. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, G. (2011). How To Do Your Case Study: A Guide for Students and Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Toadvine, T. (2019). Maurice Merleau-Ponty. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 ed.). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/merleau-ponty/. Accessed January 2022.Google Scholar

Tredennick, H. (1969). Introduction. In Plato: The Last Days of Socrates. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Van de Ven, A. H. (ed.) (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Waliaula, A. J. P. (2022). Positivism. Salem Press Encyclopedia Research Starters. EBSCOhost. Accessed March 27, 2018.Google Scholar

Wernick, A. (2001). Auguste Comte and the Religion of Humanity: The Post-Theistic Program of French Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zuckert, C. H. (2002). Hermeneutics in Practice: Gadamer on Ancient Philosophy. In Dostal, R. J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aroles, J. & Küpers, W. (2022). Flânerie as a methodological practice for explorative re-search in digital worlds. Culture and Organization, DOI: 10.1080/14759551.2022.2042538.Google Scholar

Aroles, J., Mitev, N. & de Vaujany, F-X. (2019). Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3), 285–99.Google Scholar

Bachelard, G. (1936, 2022). La dialectique de la durée: Édition établie par Élie During. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Bachelard, G. (1948). La terre et les rêveries du repos (p. 86). Paris: J. Corti.Google Scholar

Bachelard, G. (1969). The Poetics of Reverie: Childhood, Language, and the Cosmos. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Bachelard, G. (1988). Air and Dreams: An Essay on the Imagination of Movement. Dallas: The Dallas Institute Publications.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. & Madden, A. (2017). Time reclaimed: temporality and the experience of meaningful work. Work, Employment and Society, 31(1), 3–18.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (1896). Matière et mémoire. Essai sur la relation du corps à l’esprit. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar

Beyes, T. & Steyaert, C. (2021). Unsettling bodies of knowledge: Walking as a pedagogy of affect. Management Learning, 52(2), 224–42.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1995). Subjection, Resistance, Resignification. In Rajchman, J. (ed.), The Identity in Question (pp. 229–50). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Chia, R. (2002). Essai: Time, duration and simultaneity: Rethinking process and change in organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 23(6), 863–8.Google Scholar

Chia, R. (2010). Shifting Paradigms through “Letting Go”. In Wankel, C. & DeFillippi, B. (eds), Being and Becoming a Management Education Scholar (pp. 11–42). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.Google Scholar

Costas, J. & Grey, C. (2014). The temporality of power and the power of temporality: Imaginary future selves in professional service firms. Organization Studies, 35(6), 909–37.Google Scholar

Dale, K. (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5), 649–78.Google Scholar

Dale, K. & Burrell, G. (2008). The Spaces of Organisation and the Organisation of Space: Power, Identity and Materiality at Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Dawson, P. & Sykes, C. (2018). Concepts of Time and Temporality in the Storytelling and Sensemaking Literatures: A Review and Critique. International Journal of Management, 21(1), 97–114.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. (2022a). Apocalypse managériale. Paris: Éditions Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. (2022b). The Process of Depth: Temporality as Organization in Cinematographic Experience. In de Vaujany, F-X, Aroles, J. & Pérezts, M. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenologies and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. & Vitaud, L. (2017, July). Re-inventing management research with learning expeditions. LSE Business Review. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2017/07/04/re-inventing-management-research-with-learning-expeditions/.Google Scholar

Debord, G. (1956, 1958). Theory of the Dérive. Internationale situationniste, 2(20.05), 2015. Available at: https://larevuedesressources.org/theorie-de-la-dérive,038.html).Google Scholar

Debord, G. (1967). La société du spectacle. Paris: Les Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1980, 2004). A Thousand Plateaus. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar

Deroy, X. & Clegg, S. (2011). When events interact with business ethics. Organization, 18(5), 637–53.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1938, 2018). Logic - The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Read Books Ltd.Google Scholar

Fabbri, J., Mukherjee, A. & de Vaujany, F-X. (2016). Management and the Practice of Walking: An Exploration of Organizations and Organizing with Legs. In Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), 17741. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management.Google Scholar

Fleming, P. & Spicer, A. (2004). “You can check out any time you want, but you can never leave”: spatial boundaries in a high commitment organization. Human Relations, 57(1), 75–94.Google Scholar

Flood, R.L. & Jackson, M.C. (1988). Cybernetics and organization theory: a critical review. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 19(1), 13–33.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. In Dreyfus, H.L. & Rabinow, P. (eds), Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, (pp. 208–26). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Foucault, M (1985). The Use of Pleasure. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self. In Martin, L.H., Gutman, H. & Hutton, P.H. (eds), Technologies of the Self: a Seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst, MA: The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Hall, R. (1996). Representation as shared activity: Situated cognition and Dewey’s cartography of experience. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 209–38.Google Scholar

Helin, J. (2020). Temporality lost: A feminist invitation to vertical writing that shakes the ground. Organization, 1350508420956322.Google Scholar

Helin, J., Dahl, M. & Guillet De Monthoux, P. (2020). Caravan poetry: An inquiry on four wheels. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(6), 633–8.Google Scholar

Helin, J., Hernes, T., Hjorth, D. & Holt, R. (eds.) (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hernes, T. (2014). A Process Theory of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hernes, T., Simpson, B. & Söderlund, J. (2013). Managing and temporality. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 1–6.Google Scholar

Holt, R. & Johnsen, R. (2019). Time and Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 40(10), 1557–72.Google Scholar

Ingold, T. & Vergunst, J.L. (eds) (2008). Ways of Walking: Ethnography and Practice on Foot. London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., Mohrman, S.A. & Scherer, A.G. (2010). Organization studies as applied science: The generation and use of academic knowledge about organizations. Organization Studies, 31(09/10), 1189–207.Google Scholar

Juhlin, C. & Holt, R. (2022). The sensory imperative. Management Learning, 53(4), 640–51.Google Scholar

Lee, H. & Liebenau, J. (1999). Time in organizational studies: Towards a new research direction. Organization Studies, 20(6), 1035–58.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The Production of Space. Trans. D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lilja, M. (2018). The politics of time and temporality in Foucault’s theorisation of resistance: ruptures, time-lags and decelerations. Journal of Political Power, 11(3), 419–32.Google Scholar

Lorino, P. (2018). Pragmatism and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Macpherson, H. (2016). Walking methods in landscape research: moving bodies, spaces of disclosure and rapport. Landscape Research, 41(4), 425–32.Google Scholar

Mead, G.H. & Schubert, C. (1934). Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Nash, L. (2018a). Gendered places: Place, performativity and flânerie in the City of London. Gender, Work & Organization, 25(6), 601–20.Google Scholar

Nash, L. (2018b). City Rhythms: Walking and Sensing Place through Rhythmanalysis. In Dale, K., Kingma, S.F. Wasserman, V. (eds), Organizational Space and Beyond (pp. 161–88). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W.J. & Yates, J. (2002). It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 684–700.Google Scholar

Otley, D.T. (1983). Concepts of Control: The Contribution of Cybernetics and Systems Theory to Management Control. In Lowe, T. & Machin, J.L.J. (eds), New Perspectives in Management Control (pp. 59–87). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Pelurson, G. (2019). Flânerie in the dark woods: Shattering innocence and queering time in The Path. Convergence, 25(5–6), 918–36.Google Scholar

Pierce, J. & Lawhon, M. (2015). Walking as method: Toward methodological forthrightness and comparability in urban geographical research. The Professional Geographer, 67(4), 655–62.Google Scholar

Portschy, J. (2020). Times of power, knowledge and critique in the work of Foucault. Time & Society, 29(2), 392–419.Google Scholar

Reed, G., Dagli, W. & Hambly Odame, H. (2020). Co-production of knowledge for sustainability: an application of reflective practice in doctoral studies. Reflective Practice, 21(2), 222–36.Google Scholar

Reinecke, J., Suddaby, R., Tsoukas, H. & Langley, A. (eds) (2021). Time, Temporality, and History in Process Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Revel, J. (2015). Foucault avec Merleau-Ponty: ontologie politique, présentisme et histoire. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Rosa, H. (2013). Accélération. Une critique sociale du temps. Trans. Didier Renault. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Singh, P.K. (2020). The Quest for Verticality: An Inquiry into the Infinite Nature of Self-Perfection. Philosophy of Management, 19, 387–408.Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. (2021). Nietzsche et la vie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Stratford, E., Waitt, G. & Harada, T. (2020). Walking city streets: Spatial qualities, spatial justice, and democratising impulses. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45(1), 123–38.Google Scholar

Taylor, S. & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews 9(4), 325–46.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–82.Google Scholar

Yi’En, C. (2014). Telling stories of the city: Walking ethnography, affective materialities, and mobile encounters. Space and Culture, 17(3), 211–23.Google Scholar

Zask, J. (2015). Introduction à John Dewey. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Zerubavel, E. (1985). Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Adler, P. S. (ed.) (1992). Technology and the Future of Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arend, R. J. (2015). Mobius’ edge: infinite regress in the resource-based and dynamic capabilities views. Strategic Organization, 13(1), 75–85. DOI: 10.1177/1476127014563051.Google Scholar

Arend, R. J., Zhao, Y. L., Song, M., & Im, S. (2017). Strategic planning as a complex and enabling managerial tool. Strategic Management Journal, 38(8), 1741–53.Google Scholar

Augier, M. & Teece, D. J. (2008). Strategy as evolution with design: The foundations of dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in the economic system. Organization Studies, 29(8&9), 1187–208. DOI: 10.1177/0170840608094776.Google Scholar

Bacon-Gerasymenko, V., Coff, R. W., & Durand, R. (2016). Taking a second look in a warped crystal ball: Explaining the accuracy of revised forecasts. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1292–319.Google Scholar

Bakken, T., Holt, R., & Zundel, M. (2013). Time and play in management practice: An investigation through the philosophies of McTaggart and Heidegger. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 13–22.Google Scholar

Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Google Scholar

Barry, D. & Elmes, M. (1997). Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 429–52.Google Scholar

Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined Futures: Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Beckert, J. (2021). The firm as an engine of imagination: Organizational prospection and the making of economic futures. Organization Theory, 2(2). DOI: 10.1177/26317877211005773.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le Sens Pratique. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Brinckmann, J., & Sung, M. K. (2015). Why we plan: The impact of nascent entrepreneurs’ cognitive characteristics and human capital on business planning. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 9(2), 153–66.Google Scholar

Bromiley, P., Rau, D., & Yu, Z. (2017). Is R&D risky? Strategic Management Journal, 38(4), 876–91.Google Scholar

Chia, R. & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comi, A. & Whyte, J. (2018). Future making and visual artefacts: An ethnographic study of a design project. Organization Studies, 39(8), 1055–83.Google Scholar

Costas, J. & Grey, C. (2014). The temporality of power and the power of temporality: Imaginary future selves in professional service firms. Organization Studies, 35(6), 909–37.Google Scholar

Crilly, D. (2017). Time and space in strategy discourse: Implications for temporal choice. Strategic Management Journal, 38(12), 2370–89.Google Scholar

Donkin, R. (2010). The Future of Work. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–53. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0612.Google Scholar

Flyverbom, M. & Reinecke, J. (2017). The spectacle and organization studies. Organization Studies, 38(11), 1625–43.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Garud, R., Schildt, H., & Lant, T. K. (2014). Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(5), 1287–571.Google Scholar

Gavetti, G. & Menon, A. (2016). Evolution cum agency: Toward a model of strategic foresight. Strategy Science, 1(3), 207–33.Google Scholar

Gherardi, S. (2000). Practise-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–23.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gilbreth, F. B. & Gilbreth, L. M. (1917). Applied Motion Study: A Collection of Papers on the Efficient Method to Industrial Preparedness. New York: Sturgis & Walton.Google Scholar

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Fabbri, T. (2002). Revising the past (while thinking in the future perfect tense). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(6), 622–34.Google Scholar

Godfrey, P. C., Hassard, J., O’Connor, E. S., Rowlinson, M., & Ruef, M. (2016). What is organizational history? Toward a creative synthesis of history and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 590–608.Google Scholar

Hannay, A. (1996). Søren Kierkegaard – Papers and Journals: A Selection. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Hatch, M. J. & Schultz, M. (2017). Toward a theory of using history authentically: Historicizing in the Carlsberg Group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(4), 657–97.Google Scholar

Hernes, T. (2014). A Process Theory of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hjorth, D. (2004). Creating space for play/invention: Concepts of space and organizational entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(5), 413–32.Google Scholar

Hjorth, D. (2005). Organizational entrepreneurship: With de Certeau on creating heterotopias (or spaces for play). Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 386–98.Google Scholar

Hjorth, D., Holt, R., & Steyaert, C. (2015). Entrepreneurship and process studies. International Small Business Journal, 33(6), 599–611.Google Scholar

Hjorth, D., Strati, A., Drakopoulou Dodd, S., & Weik, E. (2018). Organizational creativity, play and entrepreneurship: Introduction and framing. Organization Studies, 39(2–3), 155–68.Google Scholar

Holt, R. (2004). Risk management: The talking cure. Organization, 11(2), 251–70.Google Scholar

Holt, R. & Johnsen, R. (2019). Time and organization studies. Organization Studies, 40(10), 1557–72. DOI: 10.1177/0170840619844292.Google Scholar

Honig, B. & Karlsson, T. (2004). Institutional forces and the written business plan. Journal of Management, 30(1), 29–48.Google Scholar

Hopp, C. & Greene, F. J. (2018). In pursuit of time: Business plan sequencing, duration and intraentrainment effects on new venture viability. Journal of Management Studies, 55(2), 320–51.Google Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P. & Seidl, D. (2008). The role of meetings in the social practice of strategy. Organization Studies, 29(11), 1391–426.Google Scholar

Johnson, G., Prashantham, S., Floyd, S. W., & Bourque, N. (2010). The ritualization of strategy workshops. Organization Studies, 31(12), 1589–618.Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. & Orlikowski, W. J. (2013). Temporal work in strategy making. Organization Science, 24(4), 965–95.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S. (1843). Søren Kierkegaards Skrifter (Vol. 18). Copenhagen: Søren Kierkegaard Research Center.Google Scholar

Koch, J. (2011). Inscribed strategies: Exploring the organizational nature of strategic lock-in. Organization Studies, 32(3), 337–63.Google Scholar

Koch, J., Wenzel, M., Senf, N. N., & Maibier, C. (2018). Organizational creativity as an attributional process: The case of haute cuisine. Organization Studies, 39(2–3), 251–70. DOI: 10.1177/0170840617727779.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. (1989). Vergangene Zukunft der frühen Neuzeit. In Koselleck, R. (ed.), Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten (pp. 17–37). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2013.4001.Google Scholar

Lê, J. K. (2013). How constructions of the future shape organizational responses: Climate change and the Canadian oil sands. Organization, 20(5), 722–42.Google Scholar

Levine, S. S., Bernard, M., & Nagel, R. (2017). Strategic intelligence: The cognitive capability to anticipate competitor behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 38(12), 2390–423.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1976). The future cannot begin: Temporal structures in modern society. Social Research, 43(1), 130–53.Google Scholar

Maielli, G. (2015). Explaining organizational paths through the concept of hegemony: Evidence from the Italian car industry. Organization Studies, 36(4), 491–511.Google Scholar

Malhotra, A. (2021). The postpandemic future of work. Journal of Management, 47(1), 1091–102.Google Scholar

March, J. G. (1995). The future, disposable organizations and the rigidities of imagination. Organization, 2(3–4), 427–40.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1932). The Philosophy of the Present. London: Open Court Company.Google Scholar

Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (1994). The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning: Reconceiving Roles of Planning, Plans, Planners. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice Theory, Work and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. (2002). It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 684–700.Google Scholar

Pitsis, T. S., Clegg, S. R., Marosszeky, M., & Rura-Polley, T. (2003). Constructing the Olympic dream: A future perfect strategy of project management. Organization Science, 14(5), 574–90.Google Scholar

Rasche, A. & Chia, R. (2009). Researching strategy practices: A genealogical social theory perspective. Organization Studies, 30(7), 713–34.Google Scholar

Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–63. DOI: 10.1177/13684310222225432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reckwitz, A. (2016). Zukunftspraktiken. Die Zeitlichkeit des Sozialen und die Krise der modernen Rationalisierung der Zukunft. In Reckwitz, A. (ed.), Kreativität und soziale Praxis. Studien zur Sozial- und Gesellschaftstheorie (pp. 115–35). Bielefeld, Germany: transcript.Google Scholar

Reckwitz, A. (2017). The Invention of Creativity: Modern Society and the Culture of the New. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Reinecke, J. & Ansari, S. (2017). Time, temporality, and process studies. In Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (eds.), Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies (pp. 402–16). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Rohrbeck, R., Battistella, C., & Huizingh, E. (2015). Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 1–9.Google Scholar

Rosa, H. (2013). Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schilling, M. A. (2017). The cognitive foundations of visionary strategy. Strategy Science, 3(1), 335–42.Google Scholar

Schultz, M. & Hernes, T. (2013). A temporal perspective on organizational identity. Organization Science, 24(1), 1–21. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0731.Google Scholar

Seidl, D. & Whittington, R. (2014). Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: Towards taller and flatter ontologies. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1407–21.Google Scholar

Sennett, R. (2012). Zusammenarbeit: Wie unsere Gesellschaft zusammenhält. Berlin: Hanser.Google Scholar

Sherden, W. A. (1998). The Fortune Sellers: The Big Business of Buying and Selling Predictions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Stjerne, I. S., Wenzel, M., & Svejenova, S. (2022). Commitment to grand challenges in fluid forms of organizing: The role of narratives’ temporality. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 79, 129–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000079012.Google Scholar

Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Suddaby, R. & Foster, W. M. (2017). History and organizational change. Journal of Management, 43(1), 19–38.Google Scholar

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–33. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0266.Google Scholar

Thompson, N. A. & Byrne, O. (2022). Imagining futures: Theorizing the practical knowledge of future-making. Organization Studies, 43(2), 247–68.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–82. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.13.5.567.7810.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. & Shepherd, J. (2004). Managing the Future: Foresight in the Knowledge Economy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Vaara, E. & Whittington, R. (2012). Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 285–336. DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2012.672039.Google Scholar

Wagner, P. (1994). A Sociology of Modernity: Liberty and Discipline. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wenzel, M. (2022). Taking the future more seriously: From corporate foresight to “future-making”. Academy of Management Perspectives, 36(2), 845–50. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2020.0126.Google Scholar

Wenzel, M. & Koch, J. (2018). Acceleration as process: A strategy process perspective on startup acceleration. In Drori, I. & Wright, M. (eds.), Accelerators (pp. 21–36). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Wenzel, M., Krämer, H., Koch, J., & Reckwitz, A. (2020). Future and organization studies: On the rediscovery of a problematic temporal category in organizations. Organization Studies, 41(10), 1441–55. DOI: 10.1177/0170840620912977.Google Scholar

Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613–34.Google Scholar

Wolf, C. & Floyd, S. W. (2017). Strategic planning research: Toward a theory-driven agenda. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1754–88.Google Scholar

Adler, P. S. (2009). (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociology and Organization Studies: Classical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H. (1992). Critical Management Studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Atkinson, P. (2020). Writing and Reading Ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Augier, M., March, J. G. & Sullivan, B. N. (2005). Notes on the evolution of a research community: Organization studies in Anglophone North America, 1945–2000. Organization Science, 16(1), 85–95.Google Scholar

Barnard, M. (2020). Fashion Theory: A Reader. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Barry, A. (2013). Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Barry, K. (2007). Femininity in Flight: A History of Flight Attendants. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1990). The Fashion System. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Baudrillard, J. (1970). The Consumer Society. Myths and Structures. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Behnke, A. (ed.) (2016). The International Politics of Fashion: Being Fab in a Dangerous World. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Böhm, S. (2006). Repositioning Organization Theory: Impossibilities and Strategies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bolton, S. C. (2000). Emotion here, emotion there, emotional organisations everywhere. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11(2), 155–71.Google Scholar

Bolton, S. C. & Boyd, C. (2003). Trolley dolly or skilled emotion manager? Moving on from Hochschild’s managed heart. Work, Employment & Society, 17(2), 289–308.Google Scholar

Brook, P. (2009). In critical defence of ‘emotional labour’ refuting Bolton’s critique of Hochschild’s concept. Work, Employment & Society, 23(3), 531–48.Google Scholar

Bryant, L. R. (2011). The Ethics of the Event: Deleuze and Ethics Without Αρχή. In Smith, D. W. and Jun, N. (eds), Deleuze and Ethics (pp. 21–43). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Buchanan, I. (2000). Deleuzism: Transcendental Empiricist Ethics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Cabantous, L., Gond, J. P., Harding, N. & Learmonth, M. (2016). Critical essay: Reconsidering critical performativity. Human Relations, 69(2), 197–213.Google Scholar

Campan, M. (2018). The Memoirs of Marie Antoinette, Queen of France (Vol. 6). Frankfurt: Outlook Verlag.Google Scholar

Caputo, J. D. (1997). The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida: Religion without Religion. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Case, P. (1999). Organizational studies in space: Stanislaw Lem and the writing of social science fiction. Organization, 6(4), 649–71.Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197–222.Google Scholar

Chia, R. C. H. (1996). Organizational Analysis as Deconstructive Practice. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Chugh, S. & Hancock, P. (2009). Networks of aestheticization: The architecture, artefacts and embodiment of hairdressing salons. Work, Employment & Society, 23(3), 460–76.Google Scholar

Clegg, S. (1990). Modern Organizations: Organization Studies in the Postmodern World. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Cooper, R. (1993). Technologies of Representation. In Ahonen, P (ed.), Tracing the Semiotic Boundaries of Politics (pp. 279–312). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Cooper, R. & Fox, S. (1990). The ‘texture’ of organizing. Journal of Management Studies, 27(6), 575–82.Google Scholar

Costea, B. & Amiridis, K. (2014) Martin Heidegger (1889–1976). In Helin, J., Hernes, T., Hjorth, D. & Holt, R. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, C. & Widdows, L. (2005). Hair & Fashion. London: Victoria & Albert Museum.Google Scholar

Craik, J. (2003). The Face of Fashion: Cultural Studies in Fashion. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Davies, C. J. (2013). Ethics and the Event in Deleuze, Derrida, and Badiou. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar

Davis, M. (2017). Buda’s Wagon: A Brief History of the Car Bomb. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar

De Cock, C. (2000). Essal: Reflections on fiction, representation, and organization studies: An essay with special reference to the work of Jorge Luis Borges. Organization Studies, 21(3), 589–609.Google Scholar

De Cock, C. & Land, C. (2006). Organization/literature: Exploring the seam. Organization Studies, 27(4), 517–35.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The Time-Image. Trans. H. Tomlinson & R. Galeta. London: Athlone.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and Repetition. Trans. P. Patton. London: Athlone.Google Scholar

Deroy, X. & Clegg, S. (2011). When events interact with business ethics. Organization, 18(5), 637–53.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1994). Given Time Volume 1: Counterfeit Money. Trans. P. Kamuf. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1996). Remarks on Deconstruction and Pragmatism. In Critchley, S. & Mouffe, C. (eds), Deconstruction and Pragmatism (pp. 79–88). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dollface, M. (2017). ‘ISee Hair (Aliexpress): Brazilian Straight Review’. Available at https://youtube.com/watch?v=-hTrmdzkW10 (last accessed 3rd February 2022).Google Scholar

Du Gay, P. & Vikkelsø, S. (2016). For Formal Organization: The Past in the Present and Future of Organization Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Entwistle, J. (2000). Fashion and the fleshy body: Dress as embodied practice. Fashion Theory, 4(3), 323–47.Google Scholar

Foulke, W. D. (1907). History of the Langobards by Paul the Deacon. Trans. W. D. Foulke, LL.D. With Explanatory and Critical Notes, a Biography of the Author, and an Account of the Sources of the History. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar

Gottdiener, M. (2001). Life in the Air: The New Culture of Air Travel. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Grey, C. (2005). Critical Management Studies: Towards a More Mature Politics. In Howcroft, D. & Trauth, E. M. (eds), Handbook of Critical Information Systems Research: Theory and Application. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Hancock, P. & Tyler, M. (2007). Un/doing gender and the aesthetics of organizational performance. Gender, Work and Organization, 14(6), 512–33.Google Scholar

Haraway, D. (2011). Speculative fabulations for technoculture’s generations: Taking care of unexpected country. Australian Humanities Review, 50(5), 1–18.Google Scholar

Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The Meaning of Style. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar

Hernes, T. (2014). A Process Theory of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hjorth, D., & Holt, R. (eds) (2016). It’s entrepreneurship, not enterprise: Ai Weiwei as entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5, 50–54.Google Scholar

Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: The Commercialism of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, H. (2014). Chameleon hair: How hair’s materiality affects its fashionability. Critical Studies in Fashion & Beauty, 5(1), 95–110.Google Scholar

Hussenot, A. & Missonier, S. (2016). Encompassing stability and novelty in organization studies: An events-based approach. Organization Studies, 37(4), 523–46.Google Scholar

Islam, G. (2015). Organizational Ritual: Rupture, Repetition, and the Institutional Event. In Mir, R., Wilmott, H. & Greenwood, M. (eds), The Handbook of Philosophy and Organization (pp. 542–9). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jordan, G. (2011). Clear Cut: One Woman’s Journey of Life and in the Body. New York: Lantern Books.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds) (2021). Creativity: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

King, D. & Land, C. (2018). The democratic rejection of democracy: Performative failure and the limits of critical performativity in an organizational change project. Human Relations, 71(11), 1535–57.Google Scholar

Korczynski, M. (2003). Communities of coping: Collective emotional labour in service work. Organization, 10(1), 55–79.Google Scholar

Küpers, W. (2015). Phenomenology of the Embodied Organization: The Contribution of Merleau-Ponty for Organizational Studies and Practice. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Land, C. (2005). Apomorphine silence: Cutting-up Burroughs’ theory of language and control. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organisation, 5(3), 450–71.Google Scholar

Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (eds) (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–48.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2013). An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Learmonth, M., Harding, N., Gond, J. P. & Cabantous, L. (2016). Moving critical performativity forward. Human Relations, 69(2), 251–6.Google Scholar

Lorino, P. (2018). Pragmatism and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Trans. G. Bennington & B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Malcolmson, P. (2013). Me and My Hair: A Social History. Luton: Andrews UK.Google Scholar

Marres, N. (2016). Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke, UK: Springer.Google Scholar

Mauksch, S. (2020). Five Ways of Seeing Events (in Anthropology and Organization Studies). In Mir, R. Fayard, A.-L. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Anthropology and Business (pp. 357–77). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McMurtrie, R. J. (2010). Bobbing for power: An exploration into the modality of hair. Visual Communication, 9(4), 399–424.Google Scholar

McRobbie, A. (2004). Notes on What Not To Wear and post-feminist symbolic violence. The Sociological Review, 52(2 suppl.), 97–109.Google Scholar

Nickson, D. & Korczynski, M. (2009). Editorial: Aesthetic labour, emotional labour and masculinity. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(3), 291–9.Google Scholar

O’Doherty, D. P. (2007). The question of theoretical excess: Folly and fall in theorizing organization. Organization, 14(6), 837–67.Google Scholar

O’Doherty, D. P. (2017). Reconstructing Organization: The Loungification of Society. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

O’Doherty, D. P. (2020). The Leviathan of rationality: Using film to develop creativity and imagination in management learning and education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(3), 366–84.Google Scholar

O’Doherty, D. P. & De Cock, C. (2019). Rethinking politics in organization. www.cbs.dk/en/research/departments-and-centres/department-of-organization/events/rethinking-politics-in-organization (last accessed 12 March 2021).Google Scholar

O’Doherty, D. P., De Cock, C., Rehn, A. & Ashcraft, K. L. (2013). New sites/sights: Exploring the white spaces of organization. Organization Studies, 34(10), 1427–44.Google Scholar

Ouellette, L. (2017). Dream Jobs? The Glamourisation of Beauty Service Work in Media Culture. In Aesthetic Labour (pp. 183–98). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Parker, M. (2000). The sociology of organizations and the organization of sociology: Some reflections on the making of a division of labour. The Sociological Review, 48(1), 124–46.Google Scholar

Parker, M. (2013). What is to be done? CMS as a political party. In Malin, V., Murphy, J. & Siltaoja, M. (eds), Getting Things Done (pp. 165–81). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar

Pascoe, D. (2001) Airspaces. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar

Pinchera, V. & Rinallo, D. (2021). Marketplace icon: The fashion show. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(5), 479–91.Google Scholar

Raffoul, F. (2020). Thinking the Event. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

RIBA (Royal Institute of British Architects). (2004). Manchester: Shaping the City. London: RIBA Enterprises.Google Scholar

Roach, J. R. (2007). It. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Rust, D. (2014). ‘The Critical Role of Good Hair in Business Leadership’. Available at: https://linkedin.com/pulse/20140225195519-16076441-the-critical-role-of-good-hair-in-business-leadership.Google Scholar

Sandberg, J., Loacker, B. & Alvesson, M. (2015). Conceptions of Process in Organization and Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Saraiva, T. (2016). Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism (Inside Technology). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Serres, M. (1995). Angels: A Modern Myth. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Shortt, H. (2012). Identityscapes of a hair salon: Work identities and the value of visual methods. Sociological Research Online, 17(2), 22.Google Scholar

Shortt, H. (2015). Liminality, space and the importance of ‘transitory dwelling places’ at work. Human Relations, 68(4), 633–58.Google Scholar

Shortt, H. & Warren, S. (2012). Fringe benefits: Valuing the visual in narratives of hairdressers’ identities at work. Visual Studies, 27(1), 18–34.Google Scholar

Silverman, D. (2021, March). ‘Reflections on the Theory of Organizations (1970)’. Paper presented to Now Then: David Silverman’s The Theory of Organisations at 50. Available at: https://youtube.com/watch?v=KgxexlVj2OM. Last accessed July 31, 2021.Google Scholar

Skeggs, B. (2005). The making of class and gender through visualizing moral subject formation. Sociology, 39(5), 965–82.Google Scholar

Spicer, A., Alvesson, M. & Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–60.Google Scholar

Staincliffe, C. (2002). Northern Quarter. In Chlebik, J., Grant, L., Herrmann, P. & Lawson, I. (eds), The Mancunian Way (pp. 130–9). Manchester: Clinamen Press.Google Scholar

Tarlo, E. (2016). Entanglement: The Secret Lives of Hair. London: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar

Taussig, M. T. (1992). The Nervous System. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Taussig, M. T. (1999). Defacement: Public Secrecy and the Labor of the Negative. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–82.Google Scholar

Warhurst, C., Nickson, D., Witz, A. & Cullen, A. M. (2000). Aesthetic labour in interactive service work: Some case study evidence from the new Glasgow. Service Industries Journal, 20, 1–18.Google Scholar

Williams, C. (2003). Sky service: The demands of emotional labour in the airline industry. Gender, Work & Organization, 10(5), 513–50.Google Scholar

Witz, A., Warhurst, C. & Nickson, D. (2003). The labour of aesthetics and the aesthetics of organization. Organization, 10(1), 33–54.Google Scholar

Wolkowitz, C. (2006). Bodies at Work. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Womack, Y. L. (2013). Afrofuturism: The World of Black Sci-Fi and Fantasy Culture. Chicago: Chicago Review Press.Google Scholar