Bachman, C. W. (1973). The programmer as navigator. Communications of the ACM, 16(11), 653–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society, 11(6), 985–1002.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (1950). Matter and Memory. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Chun, W. (2013). Programmed Visions: Software and Memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Claerbout, D. (2015). Description of KING (After Alfred Wertheimer’s 1956 portrait of a young man named Elvis Presley). Available at http://davidclaerbout.com/KING-after-Alfred-Wertheimer-s-1956-picture-of-a-young-man-named. Accessed 21 November 2022.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. ([1983]2005). Cinema 1: The Movement Image. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson & Robert Galeta. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. ([1985]2005). Cinema 2: The Time Image. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson & Robert Galeta. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Denson, S. (2020). Discorrelated Images. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Doane, M. A. (2002). The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency and the Archive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Eleftheriotis, D. (2010). Cinematic Journeys: Film and Movement. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Ernst, W. (2013). Digital Memory and the Archive. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Ernst, W. (2015). Media archaeology-as-such: Occasional thoughts on (més-)alliances with archaeologies proper. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 2(1), 15–23.Google Scholar

Floridi, L. (2015). Hyperhistory and the Philosophy of Information Policies. In Floridi, L. (ed.), The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era (pp. 51–64). Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht & London: Springer.Google Scholar

Flusser, V. ([1983]2013). Post-History. Trans. Rodrigo Maltez Novaes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Flusser, V. ([1983]2014). Towards a Philosophy of Photography. Trans. Anthony Matthews. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar

Flusser, V. ([1985]2011). Into the Universe of Technical Images. Trans. Nancy Ann Roth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Grosz, E. (1998). Thinking the new: Of futures yet unthought. Symplokē, 6(1/2), 38–55. http://jstor.org/stable/40550421.Google Scholar

Groys, B. (2016). In the Flow. London & New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. B. N. (2015). Feed-Forward: On the Future of Twenty-First Century Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Heidenreich, S. (2015). The Situation After Media. In Ikoniadou, E. & Wilson, S. (eds.), Media After Kittler (pp.135–54). London & New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Ieven, B. (2003). How to orientate oneself in the world: A general outline of Flusser’s theory of media. Image and Narrative, 6. Available at: https://imageandnarrative.be/inarchive/mediumtheory/bramieven.htm Accessed 21 November 2022.Google Scholar

Kittler, F. ([1985]1990). Discourse Networks 1800/1900. Trans. Michael Metteer & Chris Cullens. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Kittler, F. ([1999]2010). Optical Media. Trans. Anthony Enns. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Kittler, F. (2006). Thinking colours and/or machines. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 39–50.Google Scholar

Krämer, S. (2006). The cultural techniques of time axis manipulation: On Friedrich Kittler’s conception of media. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 93–109.Google Scholar

Lambert, G. (2016). ‘What is a Dispositif?’ Available at: https://academia.edu/25507473/What_is_a_Dispositif?campaign=upload_email Accessed 23 May 2016.Google Scholar

McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Neyland, D. (2015). Organizing algorithms. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(1), 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Niethammer, L. (1992). Posthistorie: Has History Come to an End? Trans. Patrick Camiller. London & New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Pias, C. (2003). Das digitale Bild gibt es nicht. Über das (Nicht-)Wissen der Bilder und informatische Illusion [The digital image does not exist. About the (non-)knowledge of the images and the computer illusion]. Zeitenblicke, 2(1). Available at https://mediarep.org/handle/doc/4845. Accessed 21 November 2022.Google Scholar

Shaviro, S. (2010). Post-Cinematic Affect. Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar

Siegert, B. (2015). Cultural Techniques: Grids, Filters, Doors, and Other Articulations of the Real. Trans. Gregory Winthrop-Young. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Slavin, K. (2011). ‘How algorithms shape our world’. Available at: http://ted.com/talks/kevin_slavin_how_algorithms_shape_our_world.html Accessed 20 August 2015.Google Scholar

Smith, T. (2009). What is Contemporary Art? London & Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stiegler, B. ([2001]2011). Technics and Time, 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise. Trans. Stephen Barker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. (1967). Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past and Present, 38, 56–97.Google Scholar

Totaro, P. & Ninno, D. (2016). Algorithms and the practical world. Theory, Culture and Society, 33(1), 139–52.Google Scholar

Virilio, P. ([1997]2008). Open Sky. Trans. Julia Ross. London & New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Wade, N. J. (2016). Capturing motion and depth before cinematography. Journal of the History of the Neurosciences, 25(1), 3–22.Google Scholar

Zielinski, S. ([1989]1999). Audiovisions: Cinema and Television as Entr’actes in History. Trans. Gloria Custance. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Bansal, P. Reinecke, J., Suddaby, R. & Langley, A. (2022). Temporal work: The strategic organization of time. Strategic Organization, 20(1), 6–19.Google Scholar

Barad, K. (2008). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. In Alaimo, S. & Hekman, S. (eds), Material Feminisms (pp. 120–54). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Barad, K. (2013). Mar(k)ing Time: Material Entanglement and (Re)memberings: Cutting Together and Apart. In Carlile, P., Nicolini, D., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H.. (eds), How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts and Materiality in Organization Studies (pp. 16–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barr, Jr. A. H. (1936). Cubism and Abstract Art. The Museum of Modern Art. New York. Available at: https://moma.org/documents/moma_catalogue_2748_300086869.pdf?_ga=2.242891521.2053702799.1656769981-1314868305.1656622880.Google Scholar

Bashkoff, T. (2018a). Hilma af Klint: Paintings for the Future. New York: Guggenheim.Google Scholar

Bashkoff, T. (2018b). Temples for Paintings. In Bashkoff, T. (ed.), Hilma af Klint: Paintings for the Future. New York: Guggenheim.Google Scholar

Becker, H. S. (1976). Art Worlds and Social Types. American Behavioral Scientist, 19(6), 703–18.Google Scholar

Behr, S. (2002). Differencing Modernism. In Widenheim, C. (ed.), Utopia & Reality. Modernity in Sweden 1900–1960 (pp. 108–21). New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Birnbaum, D. (2021). Lucid dreaming: Daniel Birnbaum on Hilma af Klint’s institutional imagination. Artforum, 60(1), https://artforum.com/print/202107/daniel-birnbaum-on-hilma-af-klint-s-institutional-imagination-86326.Google Scholar

Birnbaum, D. & Noring, A-S. (2013). The Legacy of Hilma af Klint: Nine Contemporary Responses. Moderna Museet. London: Koening Books.Google Scholar

Blagoev, B., Felten, S. & Kahn, R. (2018). The career of a catalogue: Organizational memory, materiality and the dual nature of the past at the British Museum (1970–Today). Organization Studies, 39, 1757–83.Google Scholar

Brinck, I. (2018). Empathy, engagement, entrainment: The interaction dynamics of aesthetic experience. Cognitive Processing, 19(2), 201–13.Google Scholar

Colstrup, T. & Tøjner, P. E. (2014). Forord. Hilma af Klint – Abstraioneerner. Louisiana Revy, 54(2), 7. Louisiana Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar

Comi, A. & Whyte, J. (2018). Future making and visual artefacts: An ethnographic study of a design project. Organization Studies, 39(8), 1055–83.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X., Mitev, N., Laniray, P., & Vaast, E. (2014). Introduction: Time and Materiality: What is at Stake in the Materialization of Time and Time as a Materialization? In de Vaujany, F-X, Mitev, N., Laniray, P., & Vaast, E.. (eds), Materiality and Time. Technology, Work and Globalization (pp. 1–13). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Davis, B. (2018, October 23). Why Hilma af Klint’s occult spirituality makes her the perfect artist for our technologically disrupted time. Artnet News. Available at: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/hilma-af-klints-occult-spirituality-makes-perfect-artist-technologically-disrupted-time-1376587.Google Scholar

Davis, B. (2019). Here’s how the Hilma af Klint show played perfectly into the current zeitgeist to become the Guggenheim’s most-visited exhibition ever. Artnet News. Available at: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/hilma-af-klint-breaks-records-guggenheim-1522192.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1994). What is Philosophy? Trans. H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell III. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Dyrschka, H. (2019). Beyond the Visible – Hilma af Klint. Zeitgeistfilm. Available at: https://zeitgeistfilms.com/film/beyondthevisiblehilmaafklint.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.Google Scholar

Feddersen, J., Hernes, T., & Svejenova, S. (2023). Towards a Processual Understanding of Buildings: Temporality, Materiality, and Politics. In de Vaujany, F-X, Holt, R., & Grandazzi, A. (eds), Organization as Time: Technology, Power and Politics (Chapter 11, this volume). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fer, B. (2020). Hilma af Klint: The Outsider Inside Herself. In Almqvist, K. & Belfrage, L. (eds), Hilma af Klint: Seeing is Believing (pp. 105–13). Stockholm: Bokförlaget Stolpe.Google Scholar

Ferren, A. (2019, October 21). In search of Hilma af Klint, who upended art history, but left few traces. The New York Times. Available at: https://nytimes.com/2019/10/21/travel/stockholm-hilma-af-klint.html.Google Scholar

Feuls, M., Stjerne, I., Reinecke, J., Garud, R., Ravasi, D., Schultz, M., & Slawinski, N. (2020). Temporality of innovations: How do different concepts of time further our understanding of managing and organizing innovations? Showcase Symposium, Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings.Google Scholar

Flaherty, M. G. (2020). The Lathe of Time: Some Principles of Temporal Agency. In Flaherty, M. G., Dalsgård, A. L., & Meinert, L. (eds), Time Work: Studies of Temporal Agency (pp. 13–30). New York & Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Flaherty, M. G., Dalsgård, A. L., & Meinert, L. (2020). Introduction. In Flaherty, M. G., Dalsgård, A. L., & Meinert, L. (eds), Time Work: Studies of Temporal Agency (pp. 3–12). New York & Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Friedman, S. S. (2020). Scaling planetarity: Spacetime in the new modernist studies – Virginia Woolf, HD, Hilma af Klint, Alicja Kwade, Kathy Jetn̄il-Kijiner. Feminist Modernist Studies, 3(2), 118–47.Google Scholar

Gasparini, G. (1995). On waiting. Time & Society, 4(1), 29–45.Google Scholar

Granqvist, N. & Gustafsson, R. (2016). Temporal institutional work. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1009–35.Google Scholar

Hernes, T. (2022). Organization and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hernes, T., Feddersen, J., & Schultz, M. (2021). Material temporality: How materiality ‘does’ time in food organizing. Organization Studies, 42(2), 351–71.Google Scholar

Hilma af Klint Foundation (2022). About. Available at: https://hilmaafklint.se/about-hilma-af-klint/.Google Scholar

Holt, R. & Johnsen, R. (2019). Time and organization studies. Organization Studies, 40(10), 1557–72.Google Scholar

Jones, C., Svejenova, S., Pedersen, J.S., & Townley, B. (2016). Misfits, mavericks and mainstreams: Drivers of innovation in the creative industries. Organization Studies, 37(6), 751–68.Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. & Orlikowski, W. J. (2013). Temporal work in strategy making. Organization Science, 24(4), 965–95.Google Scholar

Kellaway, K. (2016, February 21). Hilma af Klint: A painter possessed. The Guardian. Available at: https://theguardian.com/artanddesign/2016/feb/21/hilma-af-klint-occult-spiritualism-abstract-serpentine-gallery.Google Scholar

Kramer, H. (1987). On “The Spiritual in Art” in Los Angeles, 5(8), 1. Available at: https://newcriterion.com/issues/1987/4/on-the-aoespiritual-in-arta-in-los-angeles.Google Scholar

Lowry, G. D. (2013). Abstraction in 1936: Barr’s Diagrams. In Dickermann, L., (ed.), Inventing Abstraction, 1910–1925: How a Radical Idea Changed Modern Art (pp. 359–63). New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar

McNab, J. (2021). Hilma af Klint and the need for historical revision. Religious Studies Review, 47(1), 35–40.Google Scholar

Miller, D. & Sardais, C. (2015). Bifurcating time: How entrepreneurs reconcile the paradoxical demands of the job. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 489–512.Google Scholar

Mitsuji, T. (2021, June 15). Hilma af Klint’s ‘miraculous’ art: “In dialogue with spirits, she found her own voice.” The Guardian. Available at: https://theguardian.com/artanddesign/2021/jun/15/hilma-af-klints-miraculous-art-in-dialogue-with-spirits-she-found-her-own-voice.Google Scholar

Moderna Museet (2013). Hilma af Klint: A pioneer of abstraction. Topics and central works. Available at: https://modernamuseet.se/stockholm/en/exhibitions/hilma-af-klint-2013/topics/.Google Scholar

Moderna Museet (2016). Nu visar vi verk av Hilma af Klint. Available at: https://modernamuseet.se/stockholm/sv/2016/02/05/verk-av-hilma-af-klint-visas/.Google Scholar

MoMA (1936). Museum of Modern Art’s press release on the Exhibition of Cubism and Abstract Art. Available at: https://moma.org/documents/moma_press-release_325049.pdf.Google Scholar

MoMA’s Exhibition History (2022). Cubism and Abstract Art, Mar 2–Apr 19, 1936. Available at: https://moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/2748.Google Scholar

Müller-Westermann, I. (2013). Paintings for the Future: Hilma af Klint – A Pioneer of Abstraction in Seclusion. In Müller-Westermann, I. & Widoff, J. (eds), Hilma af Klint – A Pioneer of Abstraction (pp. 33–51). Stockholm: Moderna Museet and Hatje Cantz Verlag.Google Scholar

Obrist, H. U. (2020). An Extraordinary Opportunity. In Almqvist, K. & Belfrage, L. (eds), Hilma af Klint: Seeing is Believing (pp. 101–2). Stockholm: Bokförlaget Stolpe.Google Scholar

Ossandón, J. (2020). Reading as Theorizing: A Conjecture Based on the Savage Detectives’ Mode of Inquiry. In De Cock, C., O’Doherty, D., Huber, C., & Just, S. N. (eds), Organization 2666: Literary Troubling, Undoing and Refusal (pp. 45–61). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, S. (2001). The aesthetics of affect: Thinking art beyond representation. Angelaki, 6(3), 125–35.Google Scholar

Patriotta, G. & Hirsch, P. M. (2016). Mainstreaming innovation in art worlds: Cooperative links, conventions and amphibious artists. Organization Studies, 37(6), 867–87.Google Scholar

Pontikes, E. G. & Rindova, V. P. (2020). Shaping markets through temporal, constructive, and interactive agency. Strategy Science, 5(3), 149–59.Google Scholar

Reponen, A. (2020). Breaking Myths! Unveiling the storytelling processes in the reception of Hilma af Klint from the 1980s and 2010s. Stockholms Universitet, Institutionen för kultur och estetik. Available at: http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1469894/FULLTEXT01.pdf.Google Scholar

Rosa, H. (2019). Resonance: A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Trans. J. Wagner. Medford, MA: Polity.Google Scholar

Schjeldahl, P. (2018, October 15). Hilma af Klint’s visionary paintings. New Yorker. Available at: https://newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/22/hilma-af-klints-visionary-paintings.Google Scholar

Schultz, M. & Hernes, T. (2013). A temporal perspective on organizational identity. Organization Science, 24(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Sgourev, S. V. (2013). How Paris gave rise to Cubism and Picasso: Ambiguity and fragmentation in radical innovation. Organization Science, 24(6), 1601–17.Google Scholar

Slavich, B., Svejenova, S, Opazo, M. P., & Patriotta, G. (2020). Politics of meaning in categorizing innovation: How chefs advanced molecular gastronomy by resisting the label. Organization Studies, 41(2), 267–90.Google Scholar

Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum (2018a). Hilma af Klint: Paintings for the future. Teacher Resource Unit. Available at: https://guggenheim.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/guggenheim-education-hilma-af-klint-teacher-resource-unit-10-5.pdf.Google Scholar

Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum (2018a). Hilma af Klint: Paintings for the future. Available at: https://guggenheim.org/exhibition/hilma-af-klint.Google Scholar

Svejenova, S. (2018). “It Must Give Birth to a World”: Temporality and Creative Leadership for Artistic Innovation. In Mainemelis, C., Epitropaki, O., & Kark, R. (eds), Creative Leadership: Contexts and Prospects (pp. 171–88). New York: Routledge Studies in Leadership Research.Google Scholar

Svejenova, S., Strandgaard Pedersen, J., & Vives, L. (2011). Projects of Passion: Lessons for Strategy from Temporary Art. In Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., Frederiksen, L., & Täube, F. (eds), Project-Based Organizing and Strategic Management (Advances in Strategic Management) (Vol. 28, pp. 501–27). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

Ventura, A. (2018, October 11). Secret séances and high masters: The making of mystic painter Hilma af Klint. Frieze. Available at: https://frieze.com/article/secret-seances-and-high-masters-making-mystic-painter-hilma-af-klint.Google Scholar

Vischer, R. (1873). Über das optische Formgefühl: ein Beitrag zur Aesthetik. Leipzig: Credner.Google Scholar

Voss, J. (2018). The Traveling Hilma af Klint. In Bashkoff, T. (ed.), Hilma af Klint: Paintings for the Future (pp. 49–63). New York: Guggenheim.Google Scholar

Voss, J. (2020). Hilma af Klint. Biographie. Frankfurt: S. Fischer.Google Scholar

White, H. C. & White, C. A. (1965). Canvases and Careers: Institutional Change in the French Painting World. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–36.Google Scholar

Zeitgeist Films (2019). Film synopsis. Available at: https://zeitgeistfilms.com/film/beyondthevisiblehilmaafklint.Google Scholar

Zerubavel, E. (1987). The language of time: Toward a semiotics of temporality. The Sociological Quarterly, 28(3), 343–56.Google Scholar

Ahmed, S. (2017a). Snap! In Feministkilljoys. Available at: https://feministkilljoys.com/2017/05/21/snap/.Google Scholar

Ahmed, S. (2017b). Living a Feminist Life. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Alaimo, S. (2008). Trans-corporeal feminisms and the ethical space of nature. In Alaimo, S. and Hekman, S. (eds), Material Feminisms (pp. 237–64). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Antonakaki, M., French, J. E. & Guner, C. (2018). Realising Sara Ahmed’s ‘feminist snap’: Voices, embodiment, affectivity. Ephemera, 18(4), 923–54.Google Scholar

Bachani, J. (2021). Poetry for organizing. Organizational Aesthetics, 10(1), 1–8.Google Scholar

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Basner, K., Christensen, J. F., French, J. E. & Schreven, S. (2018). Snaptivism: A collective biography of feminist snap as affective activism. Ephemera, 18(4), 901–22.Google Scholar

Baxter, L. F. (2021). The importance of vibrant materialities in transforming affective dissonance into affective solidarity: How the Countess Ablaze Organized the Tits Out Collective. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(3), 898–916.Google Scholar

Bertelsen, L. & Murphie, A. (2010). An Ethics of Everyday Infinities and Powers: Félix Guattari on Affect and Refrain. In Gregg, M. & Seigworth, G. J. (eds), The Affect Theory Reader (pp. 138–61). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Blithe, S. J. (2019). “I always knew I was a little girly”: The gendering of skills in management training. Management Learning, 50(5), 517–33.Google Scholar

Blockmans, I. G., De Schauwer, E., Van Hove, G. & Enzlin, P. (2020). Retouching and revisiting the strangers within: An exploration journey on the waves of meaning and matter in dance. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 733–42.Google Scholar

Blue, S. (2019). Institutional rhythms: Combining practice theory and rhythmanalysis to conceptualise processes of institutionalisation. Time & Society, 28(3), 922–50.Google Scholar

Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Braidotti, R. (2019). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (2011). Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Charteris, J. & Jones, M. (2020). Replete Sensations of the Refrain: Sound, Action and Materiality in Agentic Posthuman Assemblages. In Thomas, M. & Bellingham, R. (eds), Post-Qualitative Research and Innovative Methodologies (pp. 187–202). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar

Chia, R. & Holt, R. (2006). Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies, 27(5), 635–55.Google Scholar

Cohen, I. J. (1996). Theories of action and praxis. In Turner, B. S. (ed), The Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 111–42). Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Coleman, R., Page, T. & Palmer, H. (2019). Feminist new materialist practice: The mattering of methods. MAI Feminism and Visual Culture, Spring(3).Google Scholar

Cozza, M. & Gherardi, S. (forthcoming). Posthuman Feminism and Feminist New Materialism: Towards an Ethico-onto-epistemology in Research Practices. In Katila, S., Bell, E. & Meriläinen, S. (eds), Handbook of Feminist Methodologies in Management and Organization Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Dall’Alba, G., Sandberg, J. & Sidhu, R. K. (2018). Embodying skilful performance: Co-constituting body and world in biotechnology. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(3), 270–86.Google Scholar

De Vaujany, F-X., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., Munro, I., Nama, Y. & Holt, R. (2021). Control and surveillance in work practice: Cultivating paradox in “new” modes of organizing. Organization Studies, 42(5), 675–95.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. ([1991]1994). What Is Philosophy? Trans. H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. & Parnet, C. (1988). L’Abécédaire de Gilles Deleuze [The ABCs of Gilles Deleuze]. Produced and directed by P-A. Boutang. France: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar

Gane, N. (2009). Concepts and the ‘new’ empiricism. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 83–97.Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Gatrell, C. (2011). Managing the maternal body: A comprehensive review and transdisciplinary analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 97–112.Google Scholar

Gatrell, C. (2013). Maternal body work: How women managers and professionals negotiate pregnancy and new motherhood at work. Human Relations, 66(5), 621–44.Google Scholar

Gatrell, C. (2019). Boundary creatures? Employed, breastfeeding mothers and “abjection as practice”. Organization Studies, 40(3), 421–42.Google Scholar

Gherardi, S. (1995a). Gender, Symbolism and Organizational Cultures. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Gherardi, S. (1995b). When will he say: “Today the plates are soft”? Management of ambiguity and situated decision-making. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 1(1), 9–27.Google Scholar

Gherardi, S. (2016). To start practice-theorizing anew: The contribution of the concepts of agencement and formativeness. Organization, 23(5), 680–98.Google Scholar

Gherardi, S. (2019). How to Conduct a Practice-based Study: Problems and Methods, (2nd ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gherardi, S. & Strati, A. (1988). The temporal dimension in organizational studies. Organization Studies, 9(2), 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hernes, T. (2022). Organization and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hickey-Moody, A. (2015). Manifesto: The Rhizomatics of Practice as Research. In Hickey-Moody, A. & Page, T. (eds), Arts, Pedagogy and Cultural Resistance: New Materialism (pp. 169–92). London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Hickey-Moody, A. C. (2020). New materialism, ethnography, and socially engaged practice: Space-time folds and the agency of matter. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(7), 724–32.Google Scholar

Hinton, P. & Treusch, P. (eds) (2015). Teaching with Feminist Materialisms. Utrecht: ATgender, The European Association for Gender Research, Education and Documentation.Google Scholar

Holt, R. & Sandberg, J. (2011). Phenomenology and organization theory. In Lounsbury, M. (ed), Philosophy and Organization Theory. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

Höpfl, H. & Kostera, M. (eds.) (2003). Interpreting the Maternal Organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hopwood, N. (2014). The Fabric of Practices: Times, Spaces, Bodies, Things. In McLean, L., Stafford, L. & Weeks, M., Exploring Bodies in Time and Space (pp. 137–46). Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press.Google Scholar

Hultin, L. (2019). On becoming a sociomaterial researcher: Exploring epistemological practices grounded in a relational, performative ontology. Information and Organization, 29(2), 91–104.Google Scholar

Huopalainen, A. & Satama, S. (2020). Writing birthing bodies: Exploring the entanglements between flesh and materiality in childbirth. Culture and Organization, 26(4), 333–54.Google Scholar

Jackson, A. Y. (2016). An ontology of a backflip. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 183–92.Google Scholar

Janssens, M. & Steyaert, C. (2020). The site of diversalizing: The accomplishment of inclusion in intergenerational dance. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1143–73.Google Scholar

Katila, S. (2019). The mothers in me. Management Learning, 50(1), 129–40.Google Scholar

Keller, J., Mendes, K. & Ringrose, J. (2018). Speaking “unspeakable things”: Documenting digital feminist responses to rape culture. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 22–36.Google Scholar

Kember, S. & Zylinska, J. (2012). Life after New Media: Mediation as a Vital Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kristeva, J. (1984). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lenz Taguchi, H. & St. Pierre, E. (2017). Using concepts as method in educational and social science inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(9), 643–8.Google Scholar

López, D. T. (2019). The Society of the Digital Swarm: Microblogging and Construction of Subjectivity in Homo Digitalis. In González-Prida Diaz, V. & Zamora Bonilla, J. P. Handbook of Research on Industrial Advancement in Scientific Knowledge (pp. 95–110). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar

MacLure, M. (2013). Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. In Coleman, B. & Ringrose, J. (eds), Deleuze and Research Methodologies (pp. 164–83). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Massumi, B. (1987). Translator’s Foreword: Pleasures of Philosophy. In Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (eds), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

McCormack, D. (2013). Refrains for Moving Bodies. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Mendes, K. & Ringrose, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: # MeToo and the everyday experiences of challenging rape culture. In Fileborn, B. & Loney-Howes, R. (eds), # MeToo and the Politics of Social Change (pp.37–51). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mendes, K., Ringrose, J. & Keller, J. (2019). Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back Against Rape Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Papacharissi, Z. (2016). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307–24.Google Scholar

Pink, S. (2001). Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Poggio, B. (2003). Who’s Afraid of Mothers? In Höpfl, H. & Kostera, M. (eds), Interpreting the Maternal Organizations (pp. 13–26). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Priola, V., Lasio, D., Serri, F. & De Simone, S. (2018). The organisation of sexuality and the sexuality of organisation: A genealogical analysis of sexual ‘inclusive exclusion’ at work. Organization, 25(6), 732–54.Google Scholar

Rinaldi, C. (2020). Homophobic Conduct as Normative Masculinity Test: Victimization, Male Hierarchies, and Heterosexualizing Violence in Hate Crimes. In Balloni, A. & Sette, R. (eds), Handbook of Research on Trends and Issues in Crime Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Victim Support (pp. 100–23). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar

Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R. & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and “sexting”: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–23.Google Scholar

Ringrose, J. & Mendes, K. (2018). Mediated Affect and Feminist Solidarity: Teens Using Twitter to Challenge “Rape Culture” In and Around School. In Sampson, T., Maddison, S. & Darren, D. (eds), Affect and Social Media: Emotion, Mediation, Anxiety and Contagion. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar

Ringrose, J. & Renold, E. (2014). “F**k rape!” Exploring affective intensities in a feminist research assemblage. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 772–80.Google Scholar

Ringrose, J., Warfield, K. & Zarabadi, S. (eds) (2019). Feminist Posthumanisms, New Materialisms and Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Satama, S. (2016). “Feathers on Fire”: A study of the interplay between passion and vulnerability in dance. Organizational Aesthetics, 5(1), 64–93.Google Scholar

Satama, S., Blomberg, A. & Warren, S. (2022). Exploring the embodied subtleties of collaborative creativity: What organisations can learn from dance. Management Learning, 53(2), 167–89.Google Scholar

Sauzet, S. (2015). Thinking through Picturing. In Hinton, P. and Treusch, P. (eds), Teaching with Feminist Materialisms (pp. 37–51). Utrecht: AtGender, The European Association for Gender Research, Education and Documentation.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2006). The Time of Activity. Continental Philosophy Review, 39(2), 155–82.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Shove, E. (2009). Everyday Practice and the Production and Consumption of Time. In Shove, E., Trentmann, F. & Wilk, R. (eds), Time, Consumption and Everyday Life: Practice, Materiality and Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Springgay, S. & Zaliwska, Z. (2017). Learning to be affected: Matters of pedagogy in the artists’ soup kitchen. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(3), 273–83.Google Scholar

Stengers, I. (2008). Experimenting with refrains: Subjectivity and the challenge of escaping modern dualism. Subjectivity, 22(1), 38–59.Google Scholar

Strati, A. (2019). Organizational Theory and Aesthetic Philosophies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

van Amsterdam, N. & van Eck, D. (2019a). “I have to go the extra mile.” How fat female employees manage their stigmatized identity at work. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(1), 46–55.Google Scholar

van Amsterdam, N. & van Eck, D. (2019b). In the flesh: A poetic inquiry into how fat female employees manage weight-related stigma. Culture and Organization, 25(4), 300–16.Google Scholar

van Amsterdam, N., van Eck, D. & Meldgaard Kjær, K. (2022). On (not) fitting in. Fat embodiment, affect and organizational materials as differentiating agents. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221074162Google Scholar

van Eck, D. V. & van Amsterdam, N. V. (2021). Affective engagement with airport security work: Wor(l)ding material agencies through poetry. Organizational Aesthetics, 10(1), 36–41.Google Scholar

Warfield, K. & Demone, C. (2018). Writing the Body of the Paper: Three New Materialist Methods for Examining the Socially Mediated Body. In Papacharissi, Z, (ed), A Networked Self and Human Augmentics, Artificial Intelligence, Sentience (pp. 133–52). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Warren, S. (2002). “Show me how it feels to work here”: Using photography to research organizational aesthetics. Ephemera 2(3), 224–45.Google Scholar

Wehrle, M. (2016). Normative embodiment. The role of the body in Foucault’s genealogy. A phenomenological re-reading. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 47(1), 56–71.Google Scholar

Adam, B. (1990). Time and Social Theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Ancona, D. & Chong, C-L. (1996). Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 251–84.Google Scholar

Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. (2001). Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 645–63. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.5393903.Google Scholar

Biesenthal, C., Sankaran, S., Pitsis, T., & Clegg, S. (2015). Temporality in organization studies: Implications for strategic project management. Open Economics and Management Journal, 2(1), 45–52.Google Scholar

Bluedorn, A. C. (2002). The Human Organization of Time: Temporal Realities and Experience. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Conche, M. (2011). Orientation Philosophique: Essai de Déconstruction. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Conche, M. (2012). Métaphysique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Conche, M. (2022). L’infini de la Nature: Oeuvres Philosophiques. Paris: Éditions Bouquins.Google Scholar

Dougherty, D., Bertels, H., Chung, K., Dunne, D. D., & Kraemer, J. (2013). Whose time is it? Understanding clock-time pacing and event-time pacing in complex innovations. Management and Organization Review, 9, 233–63.Google Scholar

Dyck, B. (2021). Organization and Management. In Routledge Handbook of Economic Theology. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1990). Speed and strategic choice: How managers accelerate decision making. California Management Review, 32(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166616.Google Scholar

Ellul, J. ([1987]2016). La raison d’être: Méditation sur l’Ecclésiaste (pp. 61–73). Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H-G. (1970). Concerning empty and ful-filled time. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 8(2), 341.Google Scholar

Gersick, C. J. G. (1994). Pacing strategic change: The case of a new venture. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/256768.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Gurvitch, G. (1964). The Spectrum of Social Time. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Halbesleben, J. R. B., Novicevic, M. M., Harvey, M. G., & Buckley, M. R. (2003). Awareness of temporal complexity in leadership of creativity and innovation: A competency-based model. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4–5), 433–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00046-8.Google Scholar

Hartog, F. (2015). Régimes d’historicité: Présentisme et Expériences du Temps. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar

Hartog, F. (2020). Chronos: L’Occident aux Prises avec le Temps. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Hernes, T. (2014). A Process Theory of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Holt, R. & Johnsen, R. (2019). Time and organization studies. Organization Studies, 40(10), 1557–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619844292.Google Scholar

Johnsen, R. (2016). Boredom and organization studies. Organization Studies 37(10), 1403–15.Google Scholar

Johnsen, R., Berg Johansen, C., & Toyoki, S. (2019). Serving time: Organization and the affective dimension of time. Organization, 26(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418763997.Google Scholar

Kant, E. (2021). Critique de la raison pure. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. & Orlikowski, W. J. (2013). Temporal work in strategy making. Organization Science, 24(4), 965–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0792.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

McGivern, G., Dopson, S., Ferlie, E., Fischer, M., Fitzgerald, L., Ledger, J., & Bennett, C. (2018). The silent politics of temporal work: A case study of a management consultancy to redesign public health care. Organization Studies, 39(8), 1007–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617708004.Google Scholar

Melbin, M., McGrath, J. E., & Kelley, J. R. (1986). Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. Contemporary Sociology, 16(6), 860–1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2071593.Google Scholar

Montaigne, M. de. (2004). Les Essais (p. 526). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Nowotny, H. (1992). Time and social theory. Time & Society, 1(3), 421–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463x92001003006.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. A. (2002). It’s about time: Temporal structuring organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.684.501.Google Scholar

Perlow, L. A., Okhuysen, G. A., & Repenning, N. (2002). The speed trap: Exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 931–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069323.Google Scholar

Pulk, K. (2022). Time and Temporality in Organisations: Theory and Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ratzinger, J. (2005). La mort et l’au-delà. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Reinecke, J. & Ansari, S. (2015). When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–48. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.1004.Google Scholar

Rosa, H. (2015). Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Rosa, H. (2020). The Uncontrollability of the World. Medford, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Rosset, C. (1991). La Philosophie Tragique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Rosset, C. (2013). Logique du pire. Éléments pour une philosophie tragique (pp. 42–4). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Rowell, C., Gustafsson, R., & Clemente, M. (2016). How institutions matter “in time”: The temporal structures of practices and their effects on practice reproduction. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 48A. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X201600048A010.Google Scholar

Roy, D. F. (1959). “Banana time” job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organization, 18(4), 158–68. http://jstor.org/stable/44124108.Google Scholar

Shipp, A. J. & Jansen, K. J. (2021). The “other” time: A review of the subjective experience of time in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 15(1), 299–334. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0142.Google Scholar

Sørensen, B. M., Spoelstra, S., Höpfl, H., & Critchley, S. (2012). Theology and organization. Organization, 19(3), 267–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412437464.Google Scholar

Sorokin, P. A. & Merton, R. K. (1937). Social time: A methodological and functional analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 42(5), 615–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/217540.Google Scholar

Special Issue of Strategic Organization. (2019). Temporal work: The strategic organization of time. Strategic Organization, 17(1), 145–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018824166.Google Scholar

Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York & London: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar

Thacker, E. (2014). Starry Speculative Corpse. Hants, UK: Zero Books.Google Scholar

Theunissen, M. & Sagnol, M. (2013). Théologie Négative du Temps (pp. 39–87). Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H. & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science 13(5), 567–82.Google Scholar

Yakura, E. K. (2002). Charting time: Timelines as temporal boundary objects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 956–70. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069324.Google Scholar