Ajzen, M. (2021). From De-materialization to Re-materialization: A Social Dynamics Approach to New Ways of Working. In Mitev, N., Aroles, J., Stephenson, K. A. & Malaurent, J. (eds), New Ways of Working: Organizations and Organizing in the Digital Age (pp. 205–33). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Ajzen, M., Donis, C. & Taskin, L. (2015). Kaléidoscope des Nouvelles Formes d’Organisation du Travail: L’instrumentalisation stupide d’un idéal collaboratif et démocratique. Gestion 2000, 32(3), 125–47.Google Scholar

Alfanza, M. T. (2020). Telecommuting intensity in the context of COVID-19 pandemic: Job performance and work-life balance. Economics and Business, 35(1), 107–16.Google Scholar

Alter, N. (2003). Mouvement et dyschronies dans les organisations. L’Année Sociologique, 53(2), 489–514.Google Scholar

Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A. & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 512–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aroles, J., Bonneau, C. & Bhankaraully, S. (2022). Conceptualising ‘meta-work’ in the context of continuous, global mobility: The case of digital nomadism. Work, Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211069797Google Scholar

Aroles, J., De Vaujany, F-X. & Dale, K. (2021a). Experiencing the New World of Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aroles, J., De Vaujany, F-X. & Dale, K. (2021b). Conclusion: Experiences of Continuity and Change in the New World of Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aroles, J., Mitev, N. & de Vaujany, F-X. (2019). Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3), 285–99.Google Scholar

Barad, K. (2013). Ma(r)king Time: Material Entanglements and Re-memberings: Cutting Together Apart. In Carlile, P. R., Nicolini, D., Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (eds), How Matter Matters (pp. 16–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, M. & Orlikowski, W. (2021). Scale matters: Doing practice-based studies of contemporary digital phenomena. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 467–72.Google Scholar

Becker, S. D. & Messner, M. (2013). Management control as temporal structuring. Managing in Dynamic Business Environments. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782544531.00015Google Scholar

Beyes, T. & Steyaert, C. (2012). Spacing organization: Non-representational theory and performing organizational space. Organization, 19(1), 45–61.Google Scholar

Bonneau, C. & Aroles, J. (2021). Digital Nomads: A New Form of Leisure Class? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdeau, S., Ollier-Malaterre, A. & Houlfort, N. (2019).Not all work-life policies are created equal: Career consequences of using enabling versus enclosing work-life policies. Academy of Management Review, 44(1), 172–93.Google Scholar

Bouty, I. (2017). Robert Chia: Approches processuelles et pratiques en management, une ontologie alternative. In Petit, S. C. (ed.), Les Grands Auteurs en Management (pp. 268–80). Caen: EMS Editions.Google Scholar

Chia, R. (1995). From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 16(4), 579–604.Google Scholar

Chia, R. & King, I. W. (1998). The organizational structuring of novelty. Organization, 5(4), 461–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C. & Larson, B. (2021). Work‐from‐anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claessens, B. J. C., van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G. & Roe, R. A. (2007). A review of the time management literature. Personnel Review, 36(2), 255–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clegg, S. R. & Kornberger, M. (eds) (2006). Space, Organizations and Management Theory (Vol. 17). Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar

Colley, H., Henriksson, L., Niemeyer, B. & Seddon, T. (2012). Competing time orders in human service work: Towards a politics of time. Time & Society, 21(3), 371–94.Google Scholar

Como, R., Hambley, L. & Domene, J. (2021). An exploration of work-life wellness and remote work during and beyond COVID-19. Canadian Journal of Career Development, 20(1), 46–56.Google Scholar

Cook, D. (2020). The freedom trap: Digital nomads and the use of disciplining practices to manage work/leisure boundaries. Information Technology & Tourism, 22(3), 355–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dale, K. (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5), 649–78.Google Scholar

De Vaujany, F-X., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., Munro, I., Nama, Y. & Holt, R. (2021). Control and surveillance in work practice: Cultivating paradox in ‘new’ modes of organizing. Organization Studies, 42(5), 675–95.Google Scholar

De Vaujany, F-X. & Mitev, N. (2013). Introduction: Space in Organizations and Sociomateriality. In de Vaujany, F-X & Mitev, N. (eds), Materiality and Space: Organizations, Artefacts and Practices (pp. 1–21). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Del Fa, S. (2019). Ce que différer veut dire: Absences, présences et processus de différenciation dans deux universités alternatives. (PhD thesis). Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar

Desmarez, P. & Tripier, P. (2014). Travail et santé dans la sociologie industrielle de Max Weber. La nouvelle revue du travail, 4. https://doi.org/10.4000/nrt.1678Google Scholar

Eddleston, K. A. & Mulki, J. (2017). Toward understanding remote workers’ management of work–family boundaries: The complexity of workplace embeddedness. Group & Organization Management, 42(3), 346–87.Google Scholar

Enel, L., Millerand, F. & Aurousseau, C. (2019). Comment penser le pouvoir d’agir dans un contexte de travail médiatisé et à distance? Terminal. Technologie de l’information, culture & société, 125–6.Google Scholar

Erickson, C. L. & Norlander, P. (2022). How the past of outsourcing and offshoring is the future of post‐pandemic remote work: A typology, a model and a review. Industrial Relations Journal, 53(1), 71‑89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Estagnasié, C. (2022). ‘Nourrir’ sa créativité malgré la distance: Le métatravail ambivalent des métiers créatifs à l’ère de la covid-19. Commposite, 22(2), 88–121.Google Scholar

Estagnasié, C., Bonneau, C., Vasquez, C. & Vayre, É. (2022). (Re)creating the Inhabited Workspace: Rematerialization Practices of Remote Work. In Vayre, É (ed.), Digitalization of Work, New Spaces and New Working Times. London: ISTE.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferriss, T. (2009). The 4-Hour Workweek: Escape 9–5, Live Anywhere, and Join the New Rich. New York: Harmony.Google Scholar

Fleming, P. & Spicer, A. (2004). ‘You can checkout anytime, but you can never leave’: Spatial boundaries in a high commitment organization. Human Relations, 57(1), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerson, E. (2008). Reach, Bracket, and the Limits of Rationalized Coordination: Some Challenges for CSCW. In Ackerman, M., Halverson, C., Erickson, T. & Kellogg, W. (eds), Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts (pp. 193–220). London: Springer.Google Scholar

Gherardi, S. (2016). Sociomateriality in Posthuman Practice Theory. In Hui, A., Schatzki, T. & Shove, E. (eds), The Nexus of Practices: Connections, Constellations, Practitioners (pp. 50–63). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gherardi, S. (2019). Theorizing affective ethnography for organization studies. Organization, 26(6), 741–60.Google Scholar

Gherardi, S. & Strati, A. (1988). The temporal dimension in organizational studies. Organization Studies, 9(2), 149–64.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (ed.) (1984). Elements of the Theory of Structuration. In The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structure (pp. 1–40). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gillet, N., Huyghebaert-Zouaghi, T., Austin, S., Fernet, C. & Morin, A. J. (2021). Remote working: A double-edged sword for workers’ personal and professional well-being. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(6), 1060–82.Google Scholar

Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Gregg, M. (2014). Presence Bleed: Performing Professionalism Online. In Banks, M., Gill, R., & Taylor, S. (eds), Theorizing Cultural Work: Labour, Continuity and Change in the Cultural and Creative Industries (pp. 136–48). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hamilakis, Y. & Labanyi, J. (2008). Introduction: Time, materiality, and the work of memory. History & Memory, 20(2), 5–17.Google Scholar

Hand, M. (2020). Making Time, Configuring Life: Smartphone Synchronization and Temporal Orchestration. In Kaun, A., Pentzold, C. & Lohmeier, C. (eds), Making Time for Digital Lives: Beyond Chronotopia (pp. 85–102). London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Hernes, T., Simpson, B. & Soderlund, J. (2013). Managing and temporality. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 1–6.Google Scholar

Holt, R. & Johnsen, R. (2019). Time and organization studies. Organization Studies, 40(10), 1557–72.Google Scholar

Hussenot, A. (2016). Introduction au tournant processuel. In de Vaujany, F-X, Hussenot, A. & Chanlat, J. F. (eds), Théories des organisations, nouveaux tournants (pp. 261–78). Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Hussenot, A., Bouty, I. & Hernes, T. (2019). Suivre et retranscrire l’organisation à partir des approches processuelles. In Garreau, L. & Romelaer, P. (eds), Méthodes de recherche qualitatives innovantes (pp. 125–44). Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Hussenot, A., De Vaujany, F-X. & Chanlat, J-F. (2016). Introduction: Changements socio-économiques et théories des organisations. In de Vaujany, F-X, Hussenot, A. & Chanlat, J-F (eds), Théories des organisations: Nouveaux tournants (pp. 11–21). Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Hussenot, A., Hernes, T. & Bouty, I. (2020). Studying organization from the perspective of the ontology of temporality. In Reinecke, J., Suddaby, R., Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (eds), Time, Temporality, and History in Process Organization Studies, (pp. 50–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kahrau, F. & Maedche, A. (2013). Knowledge Workers’ Time Management as Sociomaterial Practice. ECIS Completed Research. 195. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2013_cr/195Google Scholar

Kalleberg, A. L., Reskin, B. F. & Hudson, K. (2000). Bad jobs in America: Standard and nonstandard employment relations and job quality in the United States. American Sociological Review, 65(2), 256–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langley, A. N. N., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H. & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13.Google Scholar

Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magni, F., Tang, G., Manzoni, B. & Caporarello, L. (2020). Can family-to-work enrichment decrease anxiety and benefit daily effectiveness in remote workers? The unlocking effect of work-life balance. OB Plenary Spotlight Rapid Research Plenary (Covid19 and Organizational Behavior), 11, 2021.Google Scholar

Martins, H. (1974). Time and theory in sociology. In Rex, J. (ed.), Approaches to Sociology (pp. 246–94). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Massey, D. (2005). For Space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Mulki, J. P., Bardhi, F., Lassk, F. G. & Nanavaty-Dahl, J. (2009). Set up remote workers to thrive. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(1), 63.Google Scholar

Mumby, D. K. (2012). Organizational Communication: A Critical Approach. Sage.Google Scholar

Nowotny, H. (1992). Time and social theory: Towards a social theory of time. Time & Society, 1(3), 421–54.Google Scholar

O’Leary, M. B. & Cummings, J. N. (2007). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 433–52.Google Scholar

Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2009). Télétravail, horaires flexibles, crèches et projets humanitaires: Quand la nouvelle organisation du travail brouille les frontières. Personnel, (499), 76.Google Scholar

Ollier-Malaterre, A., Jacobs, J. A. & Rothbard, N. P. (2019). Technology, work, and family: Digital cultural capital and boundary management. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 425–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ollier-Malaterre, A., Valcour, M., Den Dulk, L. & Kossek, E. E. (2013). Theorizing national context to develop comparative work–life research: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 31(5), 433–47.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–48.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). Sociomateriality of organisational life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1).Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–74.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. & Scott, S. V. (2016). Digital work: A research agenda. In Czarniawska, B. (ed.), A Research Agenda for Management and Organization Studies (pp. 88–96). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. (2002). It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 684–700.Google Scholar

Ozimek, A. (2020). The future of remote work. Available at: https://content-static.upwork.com/blog/uploads/sites/6/2020/05/26131624/Upwork_EconomistReport_FWR_052020.pdf.Google Scholar

Palumbo, R. (2020). Let me go to the office! An investigation into the side effects of working from home on work-life balance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6/7), 771–90.Google Scholar

Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Popovici, V. & Popovici, A-L. (2020). Remote work revolution: Current opportunities and challenges for organizations. Ovidius University Annals Economic Sciences Series, 20, 468–72.Google Scholar

Reichenberger, I. (2018). Digital nomads: A quest for holistic freedom in work and leisure. Annals of Leisure Research, 21(3), 364–80.Google Scholar

Reinecke, J. & Ansari, S. (2015). When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–48.Google Scholar

Reinecke, J., Suddaby, R., Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (2020). Time, Temporality, and History in Process Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rothbard, N. P., Phillips, K. W. & Dumas, T. L. (2005). Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organization Science, 16(3), 243–58.Google Scholar

Salzman, M. & Palen, L. (2004). The tools we live by: A description of personal support media in work life. Computer Science Technical Reports CU-CS-981, 4, 1-10.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K. & Von Savigny, E. (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Şentürk, E., Sağaltıcı, E., Geniş, B. & Günday Toker, Ö. (2021). Predictors of depression, anxiety and stress among remote workersduring the COVID-19 pandemic. Work, 70(1), 41–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sewell, G. & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1507–29.Google Scholar

Shipp, A. J. & Jansen, K. J. (2021). The ‘other’ time: A review of the subjective experience of time in organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 15(1), 299–334.Google Scholar

Shirmohammadi, M., Au, W. C. & Beigi, M. (2022). Remote work and work-life balance: Lessons learned from the covid-19 pandemic and suggestions for HRD practitioners. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shortt, H. & Izak, M. (2020). The Contested Home. In Parker, M. (ed.), Life After Covid-19: The Other Side of Crisis (pp. 43–52). Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar

Spagnoli, P., Manuti, A., Buono, C. & Ghislieri, C. (2021). The good, the bad and the blend: The strategic role of the ‘middle leadership’ in work-family/life dynamics during remote working. Behavioral Sciences, 11(8), 112.Google Scholar

Sullivan, C. (2012). Remote Working and Work-Life Balance. In Reilly, N. P, Sirgy, M. J & Gorman, C. A (eds),Work and Quality of Life (pp. 275–90). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Taskin, L. (2006). Télétravail: Les enjeux de la déspatialisation pour le management humain. Revue Interventions économiques. Papers in Political Economy, 34.Google Scholar

Taskin, L., Ajzen, M. & Donis, C. (2017). New Ways of Working: From Smart to Shared Power. In Redefining Management (pp. 65–79). London: Springer.Google Scholar

Thompson, B. Y. (2019). The Digital Nomad Lifestyle: (Remote) Work/Leisure Balance, Privilege, and Constructed Community. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure, 2(1), 27–42.Google Scholar

Toffler, A. (1981). The Third Wave. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Tyler, M. & Cohen, L. (2010). Spaces that matter: Gender performativity and organizational space. Organization Studies, 31(2), 175–98.Google Scholar

Van de Ven, A. H. & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Marrewijk, A. & Yanow, D. (2010). Introduction: The Spatial Turn in Organizational Studies. In Organizational Spaces: Rematerializing the Workaday World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Vásquez, C. (2016). A spatial grammar of organizing: Studying the communicative constitution of organizational spaces. Communication Research and Practice, 2(3), 351–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, M. (1905). L’éthique protestante et l’esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (2012). Sur le travail industriel. Trans. P-L. van Berg. Belgium: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar

Winch, G. M. & Sergeeva, N. (2021). Temporal structuring in project organizing: A narrative perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 40(1), 40–51.Google Scholar

Aguilera, A., Virginie, L., Alain, R. & Lauret, P. (2016). Home-based telework in France: Characteristics, barriers and perspectives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92, 1–11.Google Scholar

Ahrne, G. & Brunsson, N. (eds) (2019), Organization outside Organizations. In The Abundance of Partial Organization in Social Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, C. (2019). Waiting in organisations. Time & Society, 28(2), 587–612.Google Scholar

Baines, S. & Gelder, U. (2003). What is family friendly about the workplace in the home?New Technology, Work and Employment, 18(3), 223–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barley, S. (1988). On Technology, Time, and Social Order: Technologically Induced Change in the Temporal Organization of Radiological Work. In Dubinskas, F.A. (ed.), Making Time: Ethnographies of High-Technology Organizations (pp. 123–69). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Bittman, M. (2004). Parenting and employment. What time-use surveys show. In Folbre, N. & Bittman, M. (eds), Family Time: The Social Organization of Care (pp. 152–70). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Blagoev, B., Costas, J. & Kärreman, D. (2019). “We are all herd animals”: Community and organizationality in coworking spaces. Organization, 26(6), 894–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blue, S. (2019). Institutional rhythms: Combining practice theory and rhythm analysis to conceptualise processes of institutionalisation. Time & Society, 28(3), 922–50.Google Scholar

Brocklehurst, M. (2001). Power, identity and new technology homework: Implications for “new forms” of organizing. Organization Studies, 22(3), 445–66.Google Scholar

Caillier, J. (2012). The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a US federal government agency. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(4), 461–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charmaz, K. (2009). Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Claessens, B., Roe, R. & Rutte, C. (2009). Time Management: Logic, Effectiveness and Challenges. In Roe, R. A., Waller, M. J. & Clegg, S. R. (eds), Time in Organizational Research. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Clancy, C. (2013). The politics of temporality: Autonomy, temporal spaces and resoluteness. Time and Society, 23(1), 28–48.Google Scholar

Dacin, T., Zilber, T. B., Tracey, P., Boxenbaum, E., Canniford, R., Dacin, P., Dacin, T., Farny, S., Gray, B., Kibler, E., Putnam, L. L., Shepherd, D. & Svejenova, S. (2019). “Situated institutions: The role of place, space and embeddedness in institutional dynamics.” Academy of Management Meeting: Proceedings, 1, first published online on August 1, 2019.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. & Vaast, E. (2014). If these walls could talk: The mutual construction of organizational spaceand legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(3), 713–31.Google Scholar

Dzigbede, K. D., Gehk, S. B. & Willloughby, K. (2020). Disaster resiliency of U.S. local governments: Insights to strengthen local response and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 634–43. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.13249Google Scholar

Eom, S., Choi, N. & Sung, W. (2016). The use of smart work in government: Empirical analysis of Korean experiences. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 562–71.Google Scholar

Kim, T., Mullins, L. B. & Yoon, T. (2021). Supervision of telework: A key to organizational performance. The American Review of Public Administration, 51(4), 263–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074021992058Google Scholar

Kitou, E. & Horvath, A. (2003). Energy-related emissions from telework. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(16), 3467–75.Google Scholar

Korte, W. & Wynne, R. (1996). Telework: Penetration, Potential and Practice in Europe. Amsterdam: IOS Press Ohmsha.Google Scholar

Kossek, E., Thompson, R. J. & Lautsch, B. A. (2015). Balanced workplace flexibility: Avoiding the traps. California Management Review, 57(4), 5–25.Google Scholar

Lee, H. (1999). Time and information technology: Monochronicity, polychronicity and temporal symmetry. European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 16–26.Google Scholar

Lee, H. & Sawyer, S. (2010). Conceptualizing time, space and computing for work and organizing. Time and Society, 19(3), 293–317.Google Scholar

Liang, C. C. (2019). Enjoyable queuing and waiting time. Time & Society, 28(2), 543–66. doi: 10.1177/0961463X17702164.Google Scholar

Martin, B. & MacDonnell, R. (2012). Is telework effective for organizations? A metaanalysis of empirical research on perceptions of telework and organizational outcomes. Management Research Review, 35(7), 602–16.Google Scholar

Martinez, A., Pérez‐Pérez, M., De‐Luis‐Carnicer, P. & Vela‐Jiménez, M. J. (2007). Telework, human resource flexibility and firm performance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(3), 208–23.Google Scholar

Mavrofides, T. & Papageorgiou, D. (2013). The expansion of ICT: A new framework of inclusion and exclusion from the global realm. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 6(1).Google Scholar

Mavrofides, T., Papageorgiou, D., Papadopoulos, T. & Los, A. (2014). ICT and systemic time squeeze: The uncoordinated temporalities of globalization. Time & Society, 23(1), 69–96.Google Scholar

McGrath, J. E. & Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and Human Interaction: Toward a Social Psychology of Time. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Moran, C. (2015). Time as a social practice. Time & Society, 24(3) 283–303.Google Scholar

Neufeld, D. & Fang, Y. (2005). Individual, social and situational determinants of telecommuter productivity. Information & Management, 42(7), 1037–49.Google Scholar

Olson, M. (1983). Remote office work: Changing work patterns in space and time. Communications of the ACM, 26(3), 182–7.Google Scholar

Orhan, M. A. (2017). When tasks get virtual. Journal of Management and Innovation, 3(2), 1–26.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. (2002). It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 684–700.Google Scholar

Peters, P., Poutsma, E., Van der Heijden, B., Bakker, A. B. & Thomas, B. (2014). Enjoying new ways to work: An HRM-process approach to study flow. Human Resource Management, 53(2), 271–90.Google Scholar

Pyöriä, P. (2011). Managing telework: Risks, fears and rules. Management Research Review, 34(4), 386–99.Google Scholar

Reinecke, J. & Ansari, S. (2015). When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–48.Google Scholar

Rosa, H. (2013). Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Rotter, R. (2016). Waiting in the asylum determination process: Just an empty interlude? Time & Society, 25(1), 80–101.Google Scholar

Rowell, C., Gustafsson, R. & Clemente, M. (2016). How institutions matter “in time”: The temporal structures of practices and their effects on practice reproduction. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 48A, 303–27.Google Scholar

Shipp, A. J. & Richardson, H. A. (2021). The impact of temporal schemata: Understanding when individuals entrain versus resist or create temporal structure. Academy of Management Review, 46(2), 299–319.Google Scholar

Schuster, C., Weitzman, L., Sass Mikkelsen, K., Meyer-Sahling, J., Bersch, K., Fukuyama, F., Paskov, P., Rogger, D., Mistree, D. & Kay, K. (2020). Responding to COVID-19 through surveys of public servants. Public Administration Reviews, 80(5), 792–6. http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13246Google Scholar

Sennett, R. (1998). The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Sewell, G. (2012). Employees, Organizations and Surveillance. In Ball, K., Haggerty, K. D. & Lyon, D. (eds), The Handbook of Surveillance Studies (pp. 303–12). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Seweel, G. & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1507–29.Google Scholar

Simmons, S. (1996). Flexible Working: A Strategic Guide to Successful Implementation and Operation. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar

Skade, L., Stanske, S., Wenzel, M. & Koch, J. (2020). Temporary organizing and acceleration: On the plurality of temporal structures in accelerators. Tensions and Paradoxes in Temporary Organizing Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 67, 105–25.Google Scholar

Suh, A. & Lee, J. (2015). Understanding teleworkers’ technostress and its influence on job satisfaction. Internet Research, 27(1), 140–59.Google Scholar

Tietze, S. & Musson, G. (2002). When “work” meets “home”: Temporal flexibility as lived experience. Time & Society, 11(2/3), 315–34.Google Scholar

Van Tienoven, T. (2019). A multitude of natural, social and individual time. Time & Society, 28(3),971–94.Google Scholar

Vega, R. P., Anderson, A. J. & Kaplan, S. A. (2015). A within-person examination of the effects of telework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 313–23.Google Scholar

Vihalemm, T. & Harro-Loit, H. (2019). Measuring society’s temporal synchronization via days of importance. Time & Society, 28(4), 1333–62.Google Scholar

Alimadadi, S., Davies, A., & Tell, F. (2021). A palace fit for the future: Desirability in temporal work. Strategic Organization, 20(1), 20–50. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270211012021Google Scholar

Benner, T. (2018, April 28). Realdania: Vi havde ikke bygget Blox i dag. Politiken. https://politiken.dk/kultur/arkitektur/art6474412/Realdania-Vi-havde-ikke-bygget-Blox-i-dagGoogle Scholar

Beyes, T. & Holt, R. (2020). The topographical imagination: Space and organization theory. Organization Theory. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720913880Google Scholar

Blagoev, B., Felten, S., & Kahn, R. (2018). The career of a catalogue: Organizational memory, materiality and the dual nature of the past at the British Museum (1970–Today). Organization Studies, 39(12), 1757–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618789189Google Scholar

BLOX. (2019). About BLOX. www.blox.dk/english/about-blox/Google Scholar

Brand, S. (1994). How Buildings Learn: What Happens after They’re Built. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Cnossen, B. & Bencherki, N. (2019). The role of space in the emergence and endurance of organizing: How independent workers and material assemblages constitute organizations. Human Relations, 72(6), 1057–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718794265Google Scholar

Comi, A. & Whyte, J. (2018). Future making and visual artefacts: An ethnographic study of a design project. Organization Studies, 39(8), 1055–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717094Google Scholar

Danish Architecture Center. (2020). About us. https://dac.dk/en/about/Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. , Mitev, N., Laniray, P., & Vaast, E. (eds.) (2014). Materiality and Time: Historical Perspectives on Organizations, Artefacts and Practices. Basingstoke, UK & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. & Vaast, E. (2014). If these walls could talk: The mutual construction of organizational space and legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(3), 713–31. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0858Google Scholar

Decker, S. (2014). Solid intentions: An archival ethnography of corporate architecture and organizational remembering. Organization, 21(4), 514–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508414527252Google Scholar

Design Society. (2020). Design Society. https://designsociety.dk/english/Google Scholar

Elsbach, K. D. & Pratt, M. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 181–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/078559809Google Scholar

Feddersen, J. (2020). The Temporal Emergence of Social Relations: An Event-based Perspective of Organising (PhD thesis). Copenhagen Business School. https://research.cbs.dk/en/publications/the-temporal-emergence-of-social-relations-an-event-based-perspecGoogle Scholar

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Giovannoni, E. & Napier, C. J. (2022). Multimodality and the messy object: Exploring how rhetoric and materiality engage. Organization Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221089598Google Scholar

Giovannoni, E. & Quattrone, P. (2018). The materiality of absence: Organizing and the case of the incomplete cathedral. Organization Studies, 39(7), 849–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617708005Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Hernes, T. (2004). The Spatial Construction of Organization. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamin.Google Scholar

Hernes, T. (2014). A Process Theory of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hernes, T. (2016). Process as the Becoming of Temporal Trajectory. In Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies (pp. 601–7). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957954.n38Google Scholar

Hernes, T. (2022). Organization and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hernes, T., Feddersen, J., & Schultz, M. (2021). Material temporality: How materiality ‘does’ time in food organizing. Organization Studies, 42(2), 351–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620909974Google Scholar

Hernes, T. & Schultz, M. (2020). Translating the distant into the present: How actors address distant past and future events through situated activity. Organization Theory. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787719900999Google Scholar

Hussenot, A., Hernes, T., & Bouty, I. (2020). Studying Organization from the Perspective of the Ontology of Temporality: Introducing the Events-Based Approach. In Reinecke, J., Suddaby, R., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (eds.), Time, Temporality, and History in Process Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198870715.003.0005Google Scholar

Hussenot, A. & Missonier, S. (2016). Encompassing stability and novelty in organization studies: An events-based approach. Organization Studies, 37(4), 523–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615604497Google Scholar

Ifversen, K. R. S. (2018, April 25). Skal fremme interessen for arkitektur: Blox er blevet et misfoster. Politiken. https://politiken.dk/kultur/arkitektur/art6469098/Blox-er-blevet-et-misfosterGoogle Scholar

Jones, C. & Massa, F. G. (2013). From novel practice to consecrated exemplar: Unity temple as a case of institutional evangelizing. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1099–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613492073Google Scholar

Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 11(1), 36–41.Google Scholar

Katz, B. & Noring, L. (2017). The Copenhagen City and Port Development Corporation: A Model for Regenerating Cities. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Latour, B. & Yaneva, A. (2008). Give Me a Gun and I Will Make All Buildings Move: An ANT’s View of Architecture. In Staub, U. & Geiser, R. (eds.), Explorations in Architecture: Teaching, Design, Research (pp. 80–9). Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002Google Scholar

Leonardi, P. M. (2016). Materiality as an Organizing Process: Toward a Process Metaphysics for Material Artifacts. In Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies (pp. 529–42). London:Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957954.n1Google Scholar

Leonardi, P. M. (2017). Methodological Guidelines for the Study of Materiality and Affordances. In Mir, R. & Jain, S. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research in Organization Studies (pp. 279–90). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315686103.ch15Google Scholar

Louisiana Channel. (2018, May 2). Ellen van Loon interview: Contaminating architecture. https://vimeo.com/267581418Google Scholar

Mair, J. & Hehenberger, L. (2014). Front-stage and backstage convening: The transition from opposition to mutualistic coexistence in organizational philanthropy. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1174–200.Google Scholar

Martinussen, K. & Weiss, K. L. (2018). Towards the Architecture Centre of the 21st Century. In Weiss, K. L. (ed.), BLOX (pp. 154–60). Copenhagen: Realdania.Google Scholar

Møller, J. N. (2009). Penge til husene. Copenhagen: Realdania.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520802211644Google Scholar

Petani, F. J. & Mengis, J. (2016). In search of lost space: The process of space planning through remembering and history. Organization, 23(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415605102Google Scholar

Realdania (2015). Bryghusprojektet bliver til BLOX (Press release). https://realdania.dk/projekter/blox/nyheder/bryghusprojektet-bliver-til-bloxGoogle Scholar

Realdania (ed.) (2018). BLOX: Denmark’s World of Architecture, Design and New Ideas. Realdania. https://blox.dk/media/1363/blox-pixie-book.pdfGoogle Scholar

Skovbro, A. & Weiss, K. L. (2018). BLOX from the Inside Out. In Weiss, K. L. (ed.), BLOX (pp. 145–53). Copenhagen: Realdania.Google Scholar

Slavich, B., Svejenova, S., Opazo, M. P. & Patriotta, G. (2020). Politics of meaning in categorizing innovation: How chefs advanced molecular gastronomy by resisting the label. Organization Studies, 41(2), 267–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619835268Google Scholar

Taylor, S. & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 325–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00214.xGoogle Scholar

Thau, C. (2018). Near and Far in the City: The Building as Urban Nerve Centre. In Weiss, K. L. (ed.), BLOX (pp. 97–112). Copenhagen: Realdania.Google Scholar

van Loon, E. & Weiss, K. L. (2018). City in a Box. In Weiss, K. L (ed.), BLOX (pp. 49–64). Copenhagen: Realdania.Google Scholar

Wainwright, O. (2018, May 1). Urban jumble: The building that wants to upset the calm of Copenhagen. The Guardian. https://theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/may/01/blox-danish-architecture-centre-copenhagenGoogle Scholar

Weinfurtner, T. & Seidl, D. (2019). Towards a spatial perspective: An integrative review of research on organisational space. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 35(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.02.003Google Scholar

Yaneva, A. (2009). The Making of a Building: A Pragmatist Approach to Architecture. Oxford & New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Alvarez, S. A. & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4Google Scholar

Aristotle, & McKeon, R. (2001). The Basic Works of Aristotle. Modern Library.Google Scholar

Augustine (1960). The Confessions of St. Augustine. New York: Image Books.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (2001). Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Brattström, A. & Wennberg, K. (2022). The entrepreneurial story and its implications for research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(6), 1443–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211053802Google Scholar

Chiles, T. H., Vultee, D. M., Gupta, V. K., Greening, D. W. & Tuggle, C. S. (2010). The philosophical foundations of a radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(2), 138–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492609337833Google Scholar

Crawford, G. C., Dimov, D. & McKelvey, B. (2016). Realism, empiricism, and fetishism in the study of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(2), 168–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492615601506Google Scholar

Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2015.01.002Google Scholar

Davidsson, P. & Gruenhagen, J. H. (2021). Fulfilling the process promise: A review and agenda for new venture creation process research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 1083–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720930991Google Scholar

Dimov, D. (2007). From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: The importance of person–situation learning match. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4), 561–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00188.xGoogle Scholar

Dimov, D. (2011). Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00423.xGoogle Scholar

Dimov, D. (2020). Opportunities, language, and time. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 333–51. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0135Google Scholar

Dimov, D. & Pistrui, J. (2020). Recursive and discursive model of and for entrepreneurial action. European Management Review, 17(1), 267–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12360Google Scholar

Foss, N. J. & Klein, P. G. (2012). Organizing Entrepreneurial Judgment: A New Approach to the Firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139021173Google Scholar

Foss, N. J. & Klein, P. G. (2020). Entrepreneurial opportunities: Who needs them? Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(3), 366–77. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0181Google Scholar

Gartner, W. B., Bird, B. J. & Starr, J. A. (1992). Acting as if: Differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(3), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879201600302Google Scholar

Garud, R. & Giuliani, A. P. (2013). A narrative perspective on entrepreneurial opportunities. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 157–60. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0055Google Scholar

Garud, R., Schildt, H. A. & Lant, T. K. (2014). Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25(5), 1479–92. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0915Google Scholar

Gilbert-Walsh, J. (2010). Revisiting the concept of time: Archaic perplexity in Bergson and Heidegger. Human Studies, 33(2–3), 173–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-010-9158-5Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Johnsen, C. G. & Holt, R. (2021). Narrating the facets of time in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211038107Google Scholar

Johnsen, R. (2016). Boredom and organization studies. Organization Studies, 37(10), 1403–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616640849Google Scholar

Kier, A. S. & McMullen, J. S. (2018). Entrepreneurial imaginativeness in new venture ideation. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2265–95. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0395Google Scholar

Kirzner, I. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An Austrian approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 60–85.Google Scholar

Kirzner, I. M. (2009). The alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification. Small Business Economics, 32, 145–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9153-7Google Scholar

Klein, P. G. (2008). Opportunity discovery, entrepreneurial action, and economic organization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(3), 175–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.50Google Scholar

Knight, F. H. (2005/1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Cosimo Classics.Google Scholar

Lévesque, M. & Stephan, U. (2020). It’s time we talk about time in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(2), 163–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719839711Google Scholar

McKelvie, A., Wiklund, J., McMullen, J. & Palubinskas, A. (2020). A dynamic model of entrepreneurial opportunity: Integrating Kirzner’s and Mises’s approaches to entrepreneurial action. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 23(3–4), 499–541. https://doi.org/10.35297/qjae.010078Google Scholar

McMullen, J. S. & Dimov, D. (2013). Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a. Journal of Management Studies, 50(8), 1481–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12049Google Scholar

McMullen, J. S. & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–52. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379628Google Scholar

McTaggart, J. E. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind, 17(68), 457–74.Google Scholar

Mulhall, S. (2013). The Routledge Guidebook to Heidegger’s Being and Time. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Oosterhuis, H. (2016) Cycling, modernity and national culture. Social History, 41(3), 233–48. DOI: 10.1080/03071022.2016.1180897Google Scholar

Popp, A. & Holt, R. (2013). The presence of entrepreneurial opportunity. Business History, 55(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2012.687539Google Scholar

Ramoglou, S. & Gartner, W. B. (2022). A historical intervention in the “opportunity wars”: Forgotten scholarship, the discovery/creation disruption, and moving forward by looking backward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211069310Google Scholar

Ramoglou, S. & Tsang, E. W. K. (2016). A realist perspective of entrepreneurship: Opportunities as propensities. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 410–34. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0281Google Scholar

Ricœur, P. (1980). Narrative time. Critical Inquiry, 7(1), 169–90.Google Scholar

Ricœur, P. (1985). Time and Narrative (Vol. 3). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–63. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378020Google Scholar

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2021). Even-if: Sufficient, yet unnecessary conditions for worldmaking. Organization Theory, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211005785Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2006). The time of activity. Continental Philosophy Review, 39(2), 155–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-006-9026-1Google Scholar

Schrag, C. O. (1970). Heidegger on repetition and historical understanding. Philosophy East and West, 20(3), 287–95.Google Scholar

Scott, D. (2006). The ‘concept of time’ and the ‘being of the clock’: Bergson, Einstein, Heidegger, and the interrogation of the temporality of modernism. Continental Philosophy Review, 39(2), 183–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-006-9023-4Google Scholar

Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–26. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611Google Scholar

Spinosa, C., Flores, F. & Dreyfus, H. L. (1997). Disclosing New Worlds: Entrepreneurship, Democratic Action, and the Cultivation of Solidarity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Suddaby, R., Bruton, G. D. & Si, S. X. (2015). Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: Insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.09.003Google Scholar

Svetlova, E. (2021). On the relevance of Knight, Keynes and Shackle for unawareness research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 45(5), 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beab033Google Scholar

Townsend, D. M., Hunt, R. A., McMullen, J. S. & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2018). Uncertainty, knowledge problems, and entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 659–87. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0109Google Scholar

Vogel, P. (2017). From venture idea to venture opportunity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 943–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12234Google Scholar

Wadhwani, R. D., Kirsch, D., Welter, F., Gartner, W. B. & Jones, G. G. (2020). Context, time, and change: Historical approaches to entrepreneurship research. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1346Google Scholar

Wood, M. S., Bakker, R. M. & Fisher, G. (2021). Back to the future: A time-calibrated theory of entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 147–71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0060Google Scholar

Abirached, R. (2011). Le théâtre français du XXe siècle: histoire, textes choisis, mises en scène/sous la direction de Robert Abirached (p. 1). Paris: Éditions L’avant-scène théâtre.Google Scholar

Alter, N. (2003). Mouvement et dyschronies dans les organisations. L’Année sociologique, 53(2), 489–514.Google Scholar

Antoine, A. (1999(1903)). Causerie sur la mise en scene. In Sarrazac, J-P & Marcerou, P. (eds), Antoine: lʼinvention de la mise en scène (pp. 106–20). Arles: Actes Sud-Papiers.Google Scholar

Aroles, J., Mitev, N. & de Vaujany, F-X. (2019). Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3), 285–99.Google Scholar

Banham, M. & Brandon, J. R. (eds) (1995). The Cambridge Guide to Theatre. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Beck, C. & Gleyzon, F. X. (2016). Deleuze and the event(s). Journal for Cultural Research, 20(4), 329–33.Google Scholar

Bene, C. & Deleuze, G. (1979). Superpositions. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Birth, K. (2012). Objects of Time: How Things Shape Temporality. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Brook, P. (1995). The Slyness of Boredom. In There Are No Secrets: Thoughts on Acting and Theatre. London: Methuen Drama.Google Scholar

Brook, P. (1996). The Empty Space: A Book about the Theatre: Deadly, Holy, Rough, Immediate. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Brown, J. R. (ed.) (2001). The Oxford Illustrated History of Theatre (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford Illustrated History.Google Scholar

Carter, D. M. (ed.) (2011). Why Athens? A Reappraisal of Tragic Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cederström, C. & Spicer, A. (2015). The Wellness Syndrome. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Chandler, Jr. A. D. (1993). The Visible Hand. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Chevallier, J-F. (2015). Deleuze et le théâtre, Rompre avec la representation. Paris: Editions des Solitaires Intempestifs.Google Scholar

Chia, R. (2003). Ontology: Organization as World-making. In Westwood, R. & Clegg, S., (eds), Debating Organization: Point/Counterpoint in Organization Studies (pp. 98–113). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Chia, R. C. & Holt, R. (2008). On managerial knowledge. Management Learning, 39(2), 141–58.Google Scholar

Chia, R. C. & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy Without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cummings, S., Bridgman, T., Hassard, J. & Rowlinson, M. (2017). A New History of Management. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1966). Le bergsonisme. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1969, 1995). Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1985). Cinéma 2. L’Image-Temps. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plateaux. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar

De Vaujany, F.X. (2006). Between eternity and actualization: the co-evolution of the fields of communication in the Vatican. Communications of the AIS, 18, 355–391.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. (2010). A new perspective on the genealogy of collective action through the history of religious organizations. Management & Organizational History, 5(1), 65–78.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. (2022). Apocalypse managériale, Paris: Editions Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. & Aroles, J. (2019). Nothing happened, something happened: Silence in a makerspace. Management Learning, 50(2), 208–25.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., Munro, I., Nama, Y. & Holt, R. (2021). Control and surveillance in work practice: Cultivating paradox in ‘new’ modes of organizing. Organization Studies, 42(5), 675–95.Google Scholar

Fayard, A. L. (2021). Notes on the meaning of work: Labor, work, and action in the 21st century. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(2), 207–20.Google Scholar

Fayol, H. (1916). Administration industrielle et générale. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar

Flore, G-M. (2013). Pourparlers sur le théâtre. In Bourlez, F. & Vinciguerra, L. (eds), Pourparlers, entre art et philosophie. Images et langages chez Gilles Deleuze (p. 31–46). Reims: ESAD-EPURE, Éditions et Presses Universitaires de Reims.Google Scholar

Folco, A. (2013). La querelle sur les origines de la mise en scène et les enjeux mémoriels autour de la figure d’André Antoine. Paris: Revue d’Histoire du Théâtre numérique.Google Scholar

Folco, A. & Boisson, B. (2010). La mise en scène théâtrale de 1800 à nos jours (p. 271). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Forestier, G. (2016). La tragédie française-2e éd: Règles classiques, passions tragiques. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Giedion, S. (2009). Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (2021(1959)). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Hatchuel, A. & Glise, H. (2003). Rebuilding Management: A Historical Perspective. In Adler, N., Shani, A. B. & Styhre, A. (eds), Collaborative Research in Organisations: Foundations for Learning, Change and Theoretical Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Helin, J., Hernes, T., Hjorth, D. & Holt, R. (eds) (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Holt, R. (2018). Judgment and Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jackall, R. (1988). Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Janssens, M. & Steyaert, C. (2020). The site of diversalizing: The accomplishment of inclusion in intergenerational dance. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1143–73.Google Scholar

Juhlin, C. & Holt, R. (2021). The sensory imperative. Management Learning. doi:10.1177/13505076211062220Google Scholar

Jullien, F. (2012). L’écart et l’entre. Ou comment penser l’altérité. Working Papers Series n°3, FMSH-WP-2012–03, février 2012. Available at: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00677232/documentGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, D. (ed.) (2010). The Oxford Companion to Theatre and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kieser, A. (1989). Organizational, institutional, and societal evolution: Medieval craft guilds and the genesis of formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(4), 540–64.Google Scholar

Ledger, A. J. (2019). The Director and Directing: Craft, Process and Aesthetic in Contemporary Theatre. London: Springer.Google Scholar

Loraux, N. (1999). La voix endeuillée: essai sur la tragédie grecque. Paris: FeniXX.Google Scholar

Lorino, P. (2018). Pragmatism and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lorino, P. & Mourey, D. (2013). The experience of time in the inter-organizing inquiry: A present thickened by dialog and situations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 48–62.Google Scholar

Martin, R. (2021). Histoire et épistémologie de la notion de mise en scène. Pratiques [online], 191–2. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/pratiques/11254Google Scholar

Mitchell, K. (2008). The Director’s Craft: A Handbook for the Theatre. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nowotny, H. (1992). Time and social theory: Towards a social theory of time. Time & Society, 1(3), 421–54.Google Scholar

Oldenburg, R. & Brissett, D. (1982). The third place. Qualitative Sociology, 5(4), 265–84.Google Scholar

Orel, M., Dvouletý, O. & Ratten, V. (2021). The Flexible Workplace. Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62167-4Google Scholar

Palfrey, S. & Stern, T. (2000). Shakespeare in Parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pavis, P. (2011). La mise en scène contemporaine: origines, tendances, perspectives. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Reinecke, J. & Ansari, S. (2015). When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–48.Google Scholar

Riot, E. (2019). Patterns of intention: Oberkampf and Knoll as Schumpeterian entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(7–8), 623–51.Google Scholar

Schein, E. H. (1992). How can organizations learn faster? The problem of entering the Green Room. MIT Working Papers. Available at: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-can-organizations-learn-faster-the-challenge-of-entering-the-green-room/Google Scholar

Sewell, G. & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1507–29.Google Scholar

Sloterdijk, P. (2013). In the World Interior of Capital: Towards a Philosophical Theory of Globalization. London: Polity.Google Scholar

Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441.Google Scholar

Stern, T. (2007). Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Turner, V. W. (1990). By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wahl, J. (1932). Vers le concret. Paris: Editions Vrin.Google Scholar

Warner, V. S. (2014). Borderless dramaturgy in dance theatre. In Romanska, M. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Dramaturgy (pp. 382–7). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N. (1929, 1978). Process and Reality. An Essay in Cosmology. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N. (1938, 1968). Modes of Thought. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Whyte, W. H. (19562013,). The Organization Man. Chicago: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Wiles, D. & Dymkowski, C. (eds) (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Theatre History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zourabichvili, F. (2012). Deleuze: A Philosophy of the Event: Together with the Vocabulary of Deleuze. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar