Book contents
- Organization as Time
- Organization as Time
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Organization as Time
- Part I The Politics of Time: Ontologies and Metaphysics of Organization as Time
- Part II Re-orienting Critique in Organization Studies? Exploring Jointly Time and Politics
- Part III New Ways of Organizing Work, Digitality and the Politics of Time
- 9 ‘Working the Time’
- 10 Temporal Structures of Telework in Public Sector Organizations
- 11 Towards a Processual Understanding of Buildings
- 12 The Temporality of Entrepreneurship
- 13 Management as Dramatic Events
- Part IV History and Duration: Making Things Last, Enduring Politics and Organizing
- Index
- References
13 - Management as Dramatic Events
Intense Decentred Organizing (IDO)
from Part III - New Ways of Organizing Work, Digitality and the Politics of Time
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2023
Book contents
- Organization as Time
- Organization as Time
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Organization as Time
- Part I The Politics of Time: Ontologies and Metaphysics of Organization as Time
- Part II Re-orienting Critique in Organization Studies? Exploring Jointly Time and Politics
- Part III New Ways of Organizing Work, Digitality and the Politics of Time
- 9 ‘Working the Time’
- 10 Temporal Structures of Telework in Public Sector Organizations
- 11 Towards a Processual Understanding of Buildings
- 12 The Temporality of Entrepreneurship
- 13 Management as Dramatic Events
- Part IV History and Duration: Making Things Last, Enduring Politics and Organizing
- Index
- References
Summary
The pandemic has settled work and management situations in which collaborators more rarely meet. Beyond issues of maintaining a sense of co-presence, what seems to be more and more at stake is the dramatization and intensification of encounters on site but also the dramatization of remote narrative events in the future or the past. Collaborators, customers, need to meet physically at some point in a meeting room, and something need more than ever to happen at this moment. But beyond that, organizing needs also to have an intensity. Discussions around projects, problems, opportunities, happen in the flow of an open life, in a decentered way. Organizing events of the past and the future thus need to call each other, to intensively call each other in time. Managers need to build dispersed narrative events likely to intensively elaborate this dramatic resonance for people continuously coming in and out of ephemeral projects. This Intense Decentered Organizing (IDO) based on intense moments of co-presence and intensification of past and future events is a huge stake of our time. And more than ever, dramatization and theatralization appear as very important new regimes of historicity and eventfulness.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Organization as TimeTechnology, Power and Politics, pp. 275 - 294Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Abirached, R. (2011). Le théâtre français du XXe siècle: histoire, textes choisis, mises en scène/sous la direction de Robert Abirached (p. 1). Paris: Éditions L’avant-scène théâtre.Google Scholar
Alter, N. (2003). Mouvement et dyschronies dans les organisations. L’Année sociologique, 53(2), 489–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoine, A. (1999(1903)). Causerie sur la mise en scene. In Sarrazac, J-P & Marcerou, P. (eds), Antoine: lʼinvention de la mise en scène (pp. 106–20). Arles: Actes Sud-Papiers.Google Scholar
Aroles, J., Mitev, N. & de Vaujany, F-X. (2019). Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3), 285–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banham, M. & Brandon, J. R. (eds) (1995). The Cambridge Guide to Theatre. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, C. & Gleyzon, F. X. (2016). Deleuze and the event(s). Journal for Cultural Research, 20(4), 329–33.Google Scholar
Brook, P. (1995). The Slyness of Boredom. In There Are No Secrets: Thoughts on Acting and Theatre. London: Methuen Drama.Google Scholar
Brook, P. (1996). The Empty Space: A Book about the Theatre: Deadly, Holy, Rough, Immediate. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Brown, J. R. (ed.) (2001). The Oxford Illustrated History of Theatre (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford Illustrated History.Google Scholar
Carter, D. M. (ed.) (2011). Why Athens? A Reappraisal of Tragic Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Jr. A. D. (1993). The Visible Hand. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevallier, J-F. (2015). Deleuze et le théâtre, Rompre avec la representation. Paris: Editions des Solitaires Intempestifs.Google Scholar
Chia, R. (2003). Ontology: Organization as World-making. In Westwood, R. & Clegg, S., (eds), Debating Organization: Point/Counterpoint in Organization Studies (pp. 98–113). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Chia, R. C. & Holt, R. (2008). On managerial knowledge. Management Learning, 39(2), 141–58.Google Scholar
Chia, R. C. & Holt, R. (2009). Strategy Without Design: The Silent Efficacy of Indirect Action. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cummings, S., Bridgman, T., Hassard, J. & Rowlinson, M. (2017). A New History of Management. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (1969, 1995). Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
De Vaujany, F.X. (2006). Between eternity and actualization: the co-evolution of the fields of communication in the Vatican. Communications of the AIS, 18, 355–391.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F-X. (2010). A new perspective on the genealogy of collective action through the history of religious organizations. Management & Organizational History, 5(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vaujany, F-X. & Aroles, J. (2019). Nothing happened, something happened: Silence in a makerspace. Management Learning, 50(2), 208–25.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F-X., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., Munro, I., Nama, Y. & Holt, R. (2021). Control and surveillance in work practice: Cultivating paradox in ‘new’ modes of organizing. Organization Studies, 42(5), 675–95.Google Scholar
Fayard, A. L. (2021). Notes on the meaning of work: Labor, work, and action in the 21st century. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(2), 207–20.Google Scholar
Flore, G-M. (2013). Pourparlers sur le théâtre. In Bourlez, F. & Vinciguerra, L. (eds), Pourparlers, entre art et philosophie. Images et langages chez Gilles Deleuze (p. 31–46). Reims: ESAD-EPURE, Éditions et Presses Universitaires de Reims.Google Scholar
Folco, A. (2013). La querelle sur les origines de la mise en scène et les enjeux mémoriels autour de la figure d’André Antoine. Paris: Revue d’Histoire du Théâtre numérique.Google Scholar
Folco, A. & Boisson, B. (2010). La mise en scène théâtrale de 1800 à nos jours (p. 271). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Forestier, G. (2016). La tragédie française-2e éd: Règles classiques, passions tragiques. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Giedion, S. (2009). Space, Time and Architecture: The Growth of a New Tradition. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (2021(1959)). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Hatchuel, A. & Glise, H. (2003). Rebuilding Management: A Historical Perspective. In Adler, N., Shani, A. B. & Styhre, A. (eds), Collaborative Research in Organisations: Foundations for Learning, Change and Theoretical Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Helin, J., Hernes, T., Hjorth, D. & Holt, R. (eds) (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Process Philosophy and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackall, R. (1988). Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janssens, M. & Steyaert, C. (2020). The site of diversalizing: The accomplishment of inclusion in intergenerational dance. Journal of Management Studies, 57(6), 1143–73.Google Scholar
Juhlin, C. & Holt, R. (2021). The sensory imperative. Management Learning. doi:10.1177/13505076211062220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jullien, F. (2012). L’écart et l’entre. Ou comment penser l’altérité. Working Papers Series n°3, FMSH-WP-2012–03, février 2012. Available at: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00677232/documentGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. (ed.) (2010). The Oxford Companion to Theatre and Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kieser, A. (1989). Organizational, institutional, and societal evolution: Medieval craft guilds and the genesis of formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(4), 540–64.Google Scholar
Ledger, A. J. (2019). The Director and Directing: Craft, Process and Aesthetic in Contemporary Theatre. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Lorino, P. (2018). Pragmatism and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lorino, P. & Mourey, D. (2013). The experience of time in the inter-organizing inquiry: A present thickened by dialog and situations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(1), 48–62.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (2021). Histoire et épistémologie de la notion de mise en scène. Pratiques [online], 191–2. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/pratiques/11254Google Scholar
Mitchell, K. (2008). The Director’s Craft: A Handbook for the Theatre. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowotny, H. (1992). Time and social theory: Towards a social theory of time. Time & Society, 1(3), 421–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldenburg, R. & Brissett, D. (1982). The third place. Qualitative Sociology, 5(4), 265–84.Google Scholar
Orel, M., Dvouletý, O. & Ratten, V. (2021). The Flexible Workplace. Switzerland: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62167-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palfrey, S. & Stern, T. (2000). Shakespeare in Parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pavis, P. (2011). La mise en scène contemporaine: origines, tendances, perspectives. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Reinecke, J. & Ansari, S. (2015). When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2), 618–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riot, E. (2019). Patterns of intention: Oberkampf and Knoll as Schumpeterian entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(7–8), 623–51.Google Scholar
Schein, E. H. (1992). How can organizations learn faster? The problem of entering the Green Room. MIT Working Papers. Available at: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-can-organizations-learn-faster-the-challenge-of-entering-the-green-room/Google Scholar
Sewell, G. & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1507–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloterdijk, P. (2013). In the World Interior of Capital: Towards a Philosophical Theory of Globalization. London: Polity.Google Scholar
Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, T. (2007). Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Turner, V. W. (1990). By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, V. S. (2014). Borderless dramaturgy in dance theatre. In Romanska, M. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Dramaturgy (pp. 382–7). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1929, 1978). Process and Reality. An Essay in Cosmology. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Whyte, W. H. (19562013,). The Organization Man. Chicago: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Wiles, D. & Dymkowski, C. (eds) (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Theatre History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zourabichvili, F. (2012). Deleuze: A Philosophy of the Event: Together with the Vocabulary of Deleuze. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar