Acun, H. (1991). Az Tanınan Anadolu Saat Kuleleri. Kültür ve Sanat, 3(9), 9.Google Scholar

Acun, H. (1992). Az Bilinen Saat Kulelerimiz. İlgi, 68(1), 28–31.Google Scholar

Acun, H. (1994). Anadolu Saat Kuleleri. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür, Dil, ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Acun, H. (2011). Osmanlı İmparatorluğu Saat Kuleleri. Ankara: Atatürk Kültür Merkezi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Adam, B. (1990). Time and Social Theory. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Adam, B. (2004). Time. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Adib, & Emiljanowicz, P. (2019). Colonial time in tension: Decolonizing temporal imaginaries. Time & Society, 28(3), 1221–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alihodzic, R. (2019). Clock towers from the Ottoman period in the territory of today’s Montenegro. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 36(2), 1–28. DOI: 10.4305/METU.JFA.2019.2.6Google Scholar

Altınışık, I. U. (2012). Osmanlı’da Zaman-Mekan Kavrayışının Değişimi ve Mimarlık, T.C. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İstanbul: Yıldız Technical University.Google Scholar

Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archer, M. S. & Morgan, J. (2020). Contributions to realist social theory: An interview with Margaret S. Archer. Journal of Critical Realism, 19(2), 179–200. DOI: 10.1080/14767430.2020.1732760CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atabaki, T. (2007). Time, Labour-Discipline and Modernization in Turkey and Iran: Some Comparative Remarks. In Atabaki, T. (ed.), The State and the Subaltern: Modernization, Society and the State in Turkey and Iran (pp. 1–17). New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Aydüz, S. (1995). Osmanlı Devleti’nde Müneccimbaşılık. In Günergun, F. (ed.), Osmanlı Bilimi Araştırmaları (pp. 159–207). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Aydüz, S. (1999). Osmanlı Devleti’nde Küçük Gözlemevleri: Muvakkithaneler. In Eren, G. (ed.), Osmanlı Ansiklopedisi, Vol. VIII (pp. 664–75). Osmanlı, Ankara: Yeni Türkiye.Google Scholar

Aydüz, S. (2004a). Osmanlı astronomi müesseseleri. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, 2(4), 411–54.Google Scholar

Aydüz, S. (2004b). İstanbul’da zamanın nabzını tutan mekânlar muvakkithaneler. İstanbul, 51(4), 92–7.Google Scholar

Baykara, T. (1974). İzmir Şehri ve Tarihi. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Matbaası.Google Scholar

Beaudry, M. C. (1995). Introduction: Ethnography in Retrospect. In Ellin D’Agostino, M., Winer, M., Prine, E., & Casella, E. (eds), The Written and the Wrought: Complementary Sources in Historical Archaeology (pp. 1–15). Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 79. Department of Anthropology. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar

Benjamin, W (1968). Theses on the philosophy of history. In:Illuminations, Walter Benjamin::Essays and Reflections, trans. H Zohn, ed. and intro. H Arendt. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar

Berkes, N. (1978). Türkiye’de Cagdaslasma [Modernization in Turkey]. Istanbul: Dogu-Batı Yayınları.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (1979). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of The Contemporary Human Sciences. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (1998). Philosophy and Scientific Realism. In Archer, M., Bhaskar, R., Collier, A., Lawson, T., & Norrie, A. (eds), Critical Realism: Essential Readings (pp. 16–47). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (2008). A Realist Theory of Science (2nd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (2013). The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bhaskar, R. (2016). Enlightened Common Sense: The Philosophy of Critical Realism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Birol, N. (2005). Managing the time of the bureaucrat in the late nineteenth century Ottoman administration (MA thesis) (pp. 50–4). İstanbul: Bogaziçi University.Google Scholar

Bradbury, N. M. & Collette, C. P. (2009). Changing times: The mechanical clock in late medieval literature. The Chaucer Review, 43(4), 351–75.Google Scholar

Callizo-Romero, C., Tutnjević, S., Pandza, M., Ouellet, M., Kranjec, A., Ilić, S., Gu, Y., Göksun, T., Chahboun, S., Casasanto, D., & Santiago, J. (2020). Temporal focus and time spatialization across cultures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 27, 1247–58. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01760-5Google Scholar

Cansever, M. (2009). Türkiye’nin Kültür Mirası 100 Saat Kulesi. İstanbul: NTV Yayınları.Google Scholar

Cengizkan, A. (1999). Saat Kuleleri ve Kamusal Mekan (pp. 96–103). İstanbul: Arredamento.Google Scholar

Cengizkan, A. (2002). Modernin Saati: 20.nci Yüzyılda Modernleşme ve Demokratikleşme Pratiğinde Mimarlar, Kamusal Mekan ve Konut Mimarlığı (p. 240). Boyut yayıncılık: Mimarlar Derneği.Google Scholar

Chin, C. (2011). Margins and monsters: How some micro cases lead to macro claims. History and Theory, 50(3), 341–57.Google Scholar

Collier, A. (1994). Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy. London: Verso.Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), DH.MKT. (Dahiliye Nezâreti Mektubî Kalemi) 340/41, Tarsus’un Frenklus karyesi hanedanından Feyzullah Ağa’nın saat kulesi inşa edip, içine Avrupa’dan saat getirmesinden dolayı Mecidi Nişan ile taltifi. 08.08.1312 (04.02.1895).Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), DH.MKT. (Dahiliye Nezâreti Mektubî Kalemi) 462/60, Bereketli Nahiyesi’nde müceddeden inşa edilen saat kulesinin açılışının yapıldığının Sadaret’e arzı. 21.12.1319 (13.03.1902).Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), DH.MKT. (Dahiliye Nezâreti Mektubî Kalemi) 1174/42, Kudüs’te ahali-i İslamiye’den toplanan iane ile ezani saate ayarlı bir saat kulesi inşa edilerek hizmete sokulduğu. 24–03–1325 (07.05.1907).Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), DH.MKT. (Dahiliye Nezâreti Mektubî Kalemi) 1207/93, Saat kulesi inşasına ücretsiz nezaretle hizmet ve sadakat gösteren teba-yı Devlet-i Aliye’den Pavkal Mina Efendi’nin dördüncü rütbeden Mecidi Nişanı‘yla taltifi talebi. 01.09.1325 (08.10.1907).Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), Y.EE.KP. (Yıldız Sadrazam Kamil Paşa Evrakı) 13/1210, Sultan II. Abdülhamid’in tahta çıkışının 25. Senesi münasabetiyle İzmir şehrinde yapılmakta olan şadırvanlı saat kulesi için gümüşten yapılmış süslü bir modelinin gönderildiğine dâir. 02.12.1318 (23.03.1901).Google Scholar

DABOA (Devlet Arşivleri Başkanlığı Osmanlı Arşivi), Y.PRK.UM (Yıldız Perakende Evrakı- Umum Vilayetler Tahrirâtı) 80/69, Kudüs’de ezani saati bildirir bir saat kulesi yapıldığı. 21.9.1325 (27.10.1907).Google Scholar

Darnton, R. (2004). It happened one night. New York Review of Books 24(June), 60–4.Google Scholar

Dayioğlu, S. (2010). Osmanlı’da Zamanı Belirleme Mekânları İstanbul Muvakkithaneleri. İstanbul: Kültür A. Ş.Google Scholar

Delanty, G. (1995). The limits and possibilities of a European identity: A critique of cultural essentialism. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 21(4), 15–36.Google Scholar

Duymaz, A. Ş. (2003). II. Abdülhamid Dönemi İmar Faaliyetleri (Türkiye Örnekleri) (PhD dissertation). Isparta: Süleyman Demirel University.Google Scholar

Edwards, P. K., O’Mahoney, J., & Vincent, S. (eds) (2014). Studying Organizations Using Critical Realism: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fuchs, R. & Gilbert, H. (2001). A Colonial Portrait of Jerusalem: British Architecture in Mandate Era Palestine. In Alsayyad, N. (ed.), Hybrid Urbanism: On the Identity Discourse and the Built Environment (pp. 89–91). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Gilley, B. (2017). The case for colonialism. Third World Quarterly, 38(10), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gimpel, J. (1988). The Medieval Machine: The Industrial Revolution of the Middle Ages. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, C. & Poni, C. (1979). Il nome e il come: Scambio ineguale e mercato storiografico. Quaderni Storici, 40, 1–10.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, C. & Poni, C. (1991). The Name and the Game: Unequal Exchange and the Historiographic Marketplace. In Muir, E. & Ruggiero, G. (eds), Microhistory and the Lost Peoples of Europe (pp. 1–10). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Glennie, P. D. & Thrift, N. J. (1996). Reworking E. P. Thompson’s “Time, work discipline and industrial capitalism”. Time and Society, 5(3), 275–300.Google Scholar

Glennie, P. D. & Thrift, N. J. (2005). Revolutions in the Times: Clocks and the Temporal Structures of Everyday Life. In Livingston, D. & Withers, C. W. J. (eds), Geography and Revolutions (pp. 160–98). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Glennie, P. D. & Thrift, N. J. (2009). Shaping the Day: A History of Timekeeping in England and Wales 1300–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Güntan, Ç. (2007). II. Abdülhamit Döneminde İmparatorluk İmajının Kamu Yapıları Aracılığı İle Osmanlı Kentine Yansıtılması (Unpublished thesis). İstanbul: Yıldız Technical University.Google Scholar

Gürbüz, Ş. (2009). Saat Kulelerinin Varlığı ve Yokluğu Üzerine (pp. 133–49). Derleyen, İstanbul: YKY, Zamanın Görünen Yüzü Saatler.Google Scholar

Hamann, B. E. (2016). How to chronologize with a hammer, or, the myth of homogeneous, empty time. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 261–92.Google Scholar

Hargadon, A. B. & Wadhwani, R. D. (2022). Theorizing with microhistory. Academy of Management Review (in press). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0176Google Scholar

Hashkafa (1907, August 30). This Week (”השבוע” or “ha-Shavu’a”), 93, 2 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar

Holt, R. & Johnsen, R. (2019). Time and organization studies. Organization Studies, 40(10), 1557–72.Google Scholar

Howell, S. (2003). Time Past, Time Present, Time Future: Contrasting Temporal Values in Two Southeast Asian Societies. In Contemporary Futures (pp. 136–49). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Joyner, C. W. (1999). Shared Traditions: Southern History and Folk Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar

Karač, Z. & Žunić, A. (2018). Islamic Architecture and Art in Croatia. Faculty of Architecture. Zagreb: University of Zagreb.Google Scholar

Köker, N. P. (2002). Time and Modernity in Turkish Context: Clock Towers, Squares and Public Sphere in the Case of Yozgat (Unpublished thesis). Department of Architecture. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar

Kreiser, K. (2006). Ottoman Clock Towers: A Preliminary Survey and Some General Remarks on Construction Dates, Sponsors, Locations and Functions. In Eren, H., Kaçar, M., & Durukal, Z. (eds), Essays in Honour of Ekmeleddin İhsanoğlu, Volume I, Societies, Cultures, Sciences: A Collection of Articles (pp. 543–56). İstanbul: IRCICA Research Centre for Islamic History, Art and Culture.Google Scholar

Kumbasar, Z. (2008). Osmanlı Dönemi İstanbul Muvakkithaneleri (MA thesis). İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi.Google Scholar

Lepore, J. (2001). Historians who love too much: Reflections on microhistory and biography. The Journal of American History 88(1), 129–44.Google Scholar

Levi, G. (1991). On Microhistory. In Burke, P. (ed.), New Perspectives on Historical Writing (pp. 93–113). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Makdisi, U. (2002). Ottoman orientalism. The American Historical Review, 107(3), 768–96.Google Scholar

Mumford, L. (1934). Technics and Civilization (pp. 14–15). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Munn, N. D. (1992). The cultural anthropology of time: A critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21(1), 93–123.Google Scholar

Ogle, V. (2015). The Global Transformation of Time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Şapolyo, E. B. (1969). Saat Kulelerimiz. Önasya, 4(44), 10–11.Google Scholar

Singer, S. R. (2013). Clock towers, blended modernity, and the emergence of Ottoman time (PhD dissertation). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar

Sözen, M. (ed.) (1975). Türk Mimarisinin Gelişimi ve Mimar Sinan. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Yayınları.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, G. (1998). Critical realism and historical sociology. A review article. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 40(1), 170–86.Google Scholar

Tanyeli, U. (1998). İslam dünyasında modern zaman bilincinin doğuşu ve mekânsal kavrayış sorunsalı. In Davidson, C. C. (ed.), Anytime Konferansı Bildiriler Kitabı (pp. 166–76). Ankara: Mimarlar Derneği.Google Scholar

Tanyeli, U. (1999). The emergence of modern time consciousness in the Islamic world and the problematics of spatial perception. In Davidson, C. C. (ed.), Anytime (pp. 162–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. (1967). Time, work discipline and industrial capitalism: Past and Present, 38(1), 56–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Üçsu, K. (2011). Osmanlı İstanbul’unda Zamanı Belirlemek İçin Kullanılan Araçlar, Mekânlar ve İlgili Uzmanlar (Unpublished thesis). Institute of Social Sciences. İstanbul: Istanbul University.Google Scholar

Üçsu, K. (2017). Witnesses of the time: A survey of clock rooms, clock towers and façade clocks in Istanbul in the Ottoman era. Rubrica Contemporanea, 6(12), 43–60.Google Scholar

Uluçay, M. Ç. (1941). Manisa’daki Sarây-ı Âmire ve Şehzadeler Türbesi. İstanbul: CHP Manisa Halkevi Yayınları.Google Scholar

Uluengin, B. (2010). Secularizing Anatolia tick by tick: Clock towers in the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 42(1), 17–36.Google Scholar

Ünver, S. (1975). Osmanlı Türkleri İlim Tarihinde Muvakkithaneler. In Atatürk Konferansları 1971–1972 (pp. 217–59). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.Google Scholar

Ünver, S. (1980). İstanbul Muvakkithaneleri Vazifelerinin İlmî ve Kültürel Değerleri Üzerine. In Dizer, M. (ed.), International Symposium on the Observatories in Islam, 19–23 September 1977) (pp. 45–51). Istanbul: Millî Eğitim Basımevi.Google Scholar

Yetkin, S. (2001). Kentsel bir Sembolün Doğuşu: İzmir Saat Kulesi. İzmir, Turkey: İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi.Google Scholar

Wishnitzer, A. (2009). The Transformation of Ottoman Temporal Culture during the “Long Nineteenth Century” (PhD dissertation). Tel Aviv-Yafo: Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar

Wishnitzer, A. (2010). A comment on Mehmet Bengü Uluengin, “Secularizing Anatolia tick by tick: Clock towers in the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic” (IJMES 42 [2010]: 17–36). International Journal of Middle East Studies, 42(3), 537–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wishnitzer, A. (2015). Reading Clocks, Alla Turca. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Adam, B. (1990). Time and Social Theory. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S. & Tushman, M. L. (2001). Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 645–63.Google Scholar

Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–39.Google Scholar

Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. & Pinch, T. (1987). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bitektine, A. & Haack, P. (2015). The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49–75.Google Scholar

Blanc, A. & Huault, I. (2014). Against the digital revolution? Institutional maintenance and artefacts within the French recorded music industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 83, 10–23.Google Scholar

Boutinot, A. & Delacour, H. (2022). How the malleability of material artefacts contributes to institutional maintenance: The Guimard Metropolitan Railway entrances, 1914–2000. Organization Studies, 43(12), 1967–89.Google Scholar

Boxenbaum, E. (2006). Lost in translation. The making of Danish diversity management. American Behavioural Scientist, 49(7), 939–48.Google Scholar

Boxenbaum, E., Jones, C., Meyer, R. E. & Svejenova, S. (2018). Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 39(5–6), 597–616.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. L. (2005). Where Do We Stand? Common Mechanisms in Organizations and Social Movements Research. In Davis, G. F., McAdam, D., Scott, W. R. & Zald, M. N. (eds), Social Movements and Organization Theory (pp. 41–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chen, M. J. & Miller, D. (2011). The relational perspective as a business mindset: Managerial implications for East and West. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 6–18.Google Scholar

Clark, R. K. (1990). Scheduling Dependent Real-Time Activities. Pittsburg, PN: Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar

Colombero, S. (2015). Instantiating through collective bricolage: The case of the Listed Buildings Institution (PhD Thesis 2015ENMP0033). Paris: Mines ParisTech & Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar

Colombero, S. & Boxenbaum, E. (2019). Authentication as institutional maintenance work. Journal of Management Studies, 56(2), 408–40.Google Scholar

Council of Europe. (1985). The Grenada Convention. Convention for the Protection of the Architectural Heritage of Europe. Available at: https://coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/treaty/121Google Scholar

Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G. & Waring, J. (2013). Institutional work to maintain professional power: Recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies, 33(7), 937–62.Google Scholar

Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1990). Merchants of Meaning: Management Consulting in the Swedish Public Sector. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dacin, T. & Dacin, P. (2008). Traditions as Institutionalized Practice: Implication for Deinstitutionalization. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R. & Sahlin, K. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 327–51). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Dacin, T., Munir, K. & Tracey, P. (2010). Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1393–418.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X., Adrot, A., Boxenbaum, E. & Leca, B. (2019). Conclusion: Ontological Reflections on the Role of Materiality in Institutional Inquiry. In de Vaujany, F-X, Adrot, A., Boxenbaum, E. & Leca, B. (eds), Materiality in Institutions: Spaces, Embodiment and Technology in Management and Organization (pp. 379–82). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. & Mitev, N. (2016). Introduction au tournant matériel en théories des organisations. In de Vaujany, F-X, Hussenot, A. & Chanlat, J-F (eds), Théories des Organisation: Nouveaux Tournants. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Djindjian, F. (2011). Manuel d’archéologie. Méthodes, objets et concepts. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Elliott, C. S., Hayward, D. M. & Canon, S. (1998). Institutional framing: Some experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 35(4), 455–64.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.Google Scholar

Gagliardi, P. (1990). Artifacts as Pathways and Remains of Organizational Life. In Gagliardi, P. (ed.), Symbols and Artifacts: Views of the Corporate Landscape (pp. 3–38). New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Gieryn, T. F. (2002). What buildings do. Theory and Society, 31(1), 35–74.Google Scholar

Glucksmann, M. A. (1998). What a difference a day makes: A theoretical and historical exploration of temporality and gender. Sociology, 32(2), 239–58.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Granqvist, N. & Gustafsson, R. (2016). Temporal institutional work. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1009–35.Google Scholar

Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. & Meyer, R. E. (2017). Introduction: Into the Fourth Decade. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. & Meyer, R. E. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 1–24). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Herepath, A. & Kitchener, M. (2016). When small bandages fail: The field-level repair of severe and protracted institutional breaches. Organization Studies, 37(8), 1113–39.Google Scholar

Hladik, M. (2008). Traces et fragments dans l’esthétique japonaise. Paris: Mardaga.Google Scholar

Jones, C., Lee, J. Y. & Lee, T. (2019). Institutionalizing Place: Materiality and Meaning in Boston’s North End. In Haack, P., Sieweke, J. & Wessel, L. (eds), Microfoundations of Institutions. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 65B (pp. 211–39). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar

Jones, C. & Massa, F. G. (2013). From novel practice to consecrated exemplar: Unity Temple as a case of institutional evangelizing. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1099–136.Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. & Orlikowski, W. J. (2013). Temporal work in strategy making. Organization Science, 24(4), 965–95.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. B. & Dover, G. (2015). Place and institutional work: Creating housing for the hard-to-house. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(3), 371–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawrence, T. B., Leca, B. & Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023–33.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. B. & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work. In Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies (pp. 215–54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Lawrence, T. B., Winn, M. I. & Jennings, P. D. (2001). The temporal dynamics of institutionalization. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 624–44.Google Scholar

Leblanc, S. (2015). Faut-il reconstruire la flèche de la basilique de Saint-Denis? 20 Minutes, 2878, 12.Google Scholar

Lok, J. & De Rond, M. (2013). On the plasticity of institutions: Containing and restoring practice breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 185–207.Google Scholar

McDonnell, T. E. (2010). Cultural objects as objects: Materiality, urban space, and the interpretation of AIDS campaigns in Accra, Ghana. American Journal of Sociology, 115(6), 1800–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Micelotta, E. R. & Washington, M. (2013). Institutions and maintenance: The repair work of Italian professions. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1137–70.Google Scholar

Monteiro, P. & Nicolini, D. (2015). Recovering materiality in institutional work: Prizes as an assemblage of human and material entities. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1), 61–81.Google Scholar

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius Loci. Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli International Publications.Google Scholar

Ocasio, W. C., Mauskapf, M. & Steele, C. (2016). History, society and institutions: The role of collective memory in the emergence and evolution of societal logics. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 676–99.Google Scholar

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–79.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. (2006). Material knowing: The scaffolding of human knowledgeability. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(5), 460–6.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. (2002). It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science, 13(6), 684–700.Google Scholar

Patriotta, G., Gond, J. P. & Schultz, F. (2011). Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804–36.Google Scholar

Perreau, L. (2009). La fortune de Richard Wallace. Paris: JC Lattès.Google Scholar

Pinch, T. (2008). Technology and institutions: Living in a material world. Theory and Society, 37(5), 461–83.Google Scholar

Quinn-Trank, C. Q. & Washington, M. (2009). Maintaining an Institution in a Contested Organizational Field: The Work of the AACSB and Its Constituents. In Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R. & Leca, B. (eds), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (pp. 236–61). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rathmann, K. (1998). Sustainable Architecture Module: Recycling and Reuse of Building Materials. Ann Arbor, MI: National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education.Google Scholar

Raynard, M., Kodeih, F. & Greenwood, R. (2021). Proudly elitist and undemocratic? The distributed maintenance of contested practices. Organization Studies, 42(1), 7–33.Google Scholar

Reay, T., Golden-Biddle, K. & Germann, K. (2006). Legitimizing a new role: Small wins and microprocesses of change. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 977–98.Google Scholar

Riegl, A. ([1903]2001). Le culte moderne des monuments: Son essence et sa genèse (2001). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Sahlin, K. & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R. & Sahlin, K. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 218–42). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Schnapp, A., Lehoërff, A., Giligny, F. & Demoule, J. P. (2020). Guide des méthodes de l’archéologie. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Schultz, M. & Hernes, T. (2013). A temporal perspective on organizational identity. Organization Science, 24(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Scott, W. R. (2003). Institutional carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4), 879–94.Google Scholar

Siebert, S., Wilson, F. & Hamilton, J. R. A. (2017). “Devils may sit here”: The role of enchantment in institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1607–32.Google Scholar

Siemsen, J. (1997). Sølvgades Skole 150 år i 1997: Tekster og billeder omkring skolen der aldrip gi’rop – især fra de sidste 50 år. København: Sølvgades Skole Publications.Google Scholar

Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B. Jr., Worden, S. K. & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–81.Google Scholar

Suárez, D. (2007). Education professionals and the construction of human rights education. Comparative Education Review, 51(1), 48–70.Google Scholar

Suchman, M. C. (2003). The contract as social artifact. Law & Society Review, 37(1), 91–142.Google Scholar

Townley, B. (1997). The institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organization Studies, 18(2), 261–85.Google Scholar

Tucker, S. (2006). Cyclical institutions: The case of midwifery care in Ontario, 1800–2005. Working paper. Kingston, Canada: Queen’s University.Google Scholar

Wright, A. L., Zammuto, R. F. & Liesch, P. W. (2017). Maintaining the values of a profession: Institutional work and moral emotions in the emergency department. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 200–37.Google Scholar

Zerubavel, Y. (1995). Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Zilber, T. B. (2009). Institutional Maintenance as Narrative Acts. In Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R. & Leca, B. (eds), Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations (pp. 205–35). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zilber, T. B. (2011). Institutional multiplicity in practice: A tale of two high-tech conferences in Israel. Organization Science, 22(6), 1539–59.Google Scholar

Adam, B. (2002). Perceptions of Time. In Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology (2nd ed., pp. 537–60). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Adam, B. (2013). Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Birth, K. (2012). Objects of Time: How Things Shape Temporality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Blyton, P., Hassard, J., Hill, S. & Starkey, K. (2017). Time, Work and Organisation.London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bolter, J. D. & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Borsari, G. (2020). E-Justice in Italy. National Conference on Technology in the Justice Sector. Kingston, Jamaica, 27–29 February.Google Scholar

Brannen, J. (2005). Time and the negotiation of work–family boundaries: Autonomy or illusion? Time & Society, 14(1), 113–31.Google Scholar

Canguilhem, G. (1991). The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Carnevali, D. & Resca, A. (2014). Pushing at the Edge of Maximum Manageable Complexity: The Case of “Trial Online” in Italy. In Contini, F. & Lanzara, G. F. (eds), The Circulation of Agency in e-Justice (pp. 161–83). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

CEPEJ (2015). Study on Council of Europe Member States Appeal and Supreme Courts’ Lengths of Proceedings Edition 2015 (2006–2012 data). CEPEJ Studies No. 17. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

CEPEJ (2016). Towards European Timeframes for Judicial Proceedings – Implementation Guide (p. 5). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

CEPEJ (2020). Case Weighting in Judicial Systems – CEPEJ Studies No. 28. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Cerillo, C. & Fabra, P. (2009). E-Justice: Information and Communication Technologies in the Court System. Hershey, PA: IGI-Global.Google Scholar

Church, T., Carlson, A., Lee, J. L. & Tan, T. (1978). Justice Delayed: The Pace of Litigation in Urban Trial Courts. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar

Contini, F. & Fabri, M. (eds) (2003). Judicial Electronic Data Interchange in Europe: Applications, Policies and Trends. Bologna: Lo scarabeo.Google Scholar

Contini, F. & Lanzara, G. F. (eds) (2009a). ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Contini, F. & Lanzara, G. F. (2009b). Introduction. In ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Contini, F. & Lanzara, G. F. (eds) (2014). The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice. Interoperability and Infrastructures for European Transborder Judicial Proceedings Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Contini, F. & Lanzara, G. F. (2018). The elusive mediation between law and technology. Undetectable errors in ICT–based judicial proceedings. In Branco, P., Hosen, N., Leone, M. & Mohr, R. (eds), Tools of Meaning (pp. 39–66). Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar

Contini, F. & Mohr, R. (2014). How the Law Can Make It Simple: Easing the Circulation of Agency in e-Justice. In The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice (pp. 53–79). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X., Mitev, N., Laniray, P. & Vaast, E. (eds) (2014). Materiality and Time: Historical Perspectives on Organisations, Artefacts and Practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X., Mitev, N., Lanzara, G. F. & Mukherjee, A. (2015). Introduction: Making Sense of Rules and Materiality: The New Challenge for Management and Organization Studies? In Materiality, Rules and Regulation (pp. 1–29). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, R. I., Langbroek, P. M., Bozorg Zadeh, K. & Türk, Z. (2017). The Evaluation and Development of the Quality of Justice in the Netherlands. In Contini, F. (ed.), Handle with Care: Assessing and Designing Methods for Evaluation and Development of the Quality of Justice (pp. 227–76). Bologna: IRSIG-CNR.Google Scholar

ECHR (2020). Guide on Article 6 of the Convention – Right to a Fair Trial (criminal limb). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Fabri, M. (2021). Will COVID-19 accelerate implementation of ICT in courts? International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2), 1–13.Google Scholar

Fabri, M. (2022). Judicial proceedings cannot only be counted, they must be weighted: The situation in the European judiciaries (unpublished manuscript). Bologna: IGSG-CNR.Google Scholar

Fabri, M. & Langbroek, P. M. (eds) (2000). The Challenge of Change for Judicial Systems: Developing a Public Administration Perspective. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1993). New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Glucksmann, M. A. (1998). “What a difference a day makes”: A theoretical and historical exploration of temporality and gender. Sociology, 32(2), 239–58.Google Scholar

Hildebrandt, M. (2008). Legal and technological normativity: More (and less) than twin sisters. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 12(3), 169–83.Google Scholar

Kallinikos, J. (2009). The Regulative Regime of Technology. In ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector (pp. 66–87). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lanzara, G. F. (2009a). Reshaping practice across media: Material mediation, medium specificity and practical knowledge in judicial work. Organisation Studies, 30(12), 1369–90.Google Scholar

Lanzara, G. F. (2009b). Building Digital Institutions: ICT and the Rise of Assemblages in Government. In ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector (pp. 9–48). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lanzara, G. F. (2015). How Technology Remediates Practice: Objects, Rules, and New Media. In Materiality, Rules and Regulation (pp. 195–220). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lanzara, G. F., de Vaujany, F-X., Mitev, N. & Mukherjee, A. (eds) (2015). Materiality, Rules and Regulation: New Trends in Management and Organisation Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lanzara, G. F. & Patriotta, G. (2001). Technology and the courtroom: An inquiry into knowledge making in organisations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 94–171.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1992). Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a few Mundane Artifacts. In Bijker, W. E. & J. Law (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 225–58). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ng, G. Y. (2007). Quality of Judicial Organisation and Checks and Balances. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Google Scholar

Onţanu, E. A. & Velicogna, M. (2021). The challenge of comparing EU Member States judicial data. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 11(2), 446–80.Google Scholar

Onţanu, E. A., Velicogna, M. & Contini, F. (2017). How many cases: Assessing the comparability of EU judicial datasets. Comparative Law Review, 8(2), 1–39.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. & Yates, J. (2002). It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organisations. Organisation Science, 13(6), 684–700.Google Scholar

Osborne, P. (2011). The Politics of Time: Modernity and Avant-Garde. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar

Peckham, R. F. (1981). The federal judge as a case manager: The new role in guiding a case from filing to disposition. California Law Review, 69(3), 770–85.Google Scholar

Reiling, D. (2010). Technology for Justice: How Information Technology Can Support Judicial Reform. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar

Reilly, J. A. (1987). Sharī‘a court registers and land tenure around nineteenth-century Damascus. Review of Middle East Studies, 21(2), 155–69.Google Scholar

Sanders, A. (2021). Video-hearings in Europe before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal for Court Administration, 12(2), 1–21.Google Scholar

Sobers-Khan, N. (2014). Slaves without Shackles: Forced Labour and Manumission in the Galata Court Registers 1560–1572. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag GmbH.Google Scholar

Steelman, D. C. & Fabri, M. (2008). Can an Italian court use the American approach to delay reduction? Justice System Journal, 29(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Steelman, D. C., Goerdt, J. & McMillan, J. E. (2000). Caseflow Management: The Heart of Court Management in the New Millennium (pp. 137–43). Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar

Summers, R. S. (2006). Form and Function in a Legal System: A General Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar

Thompson, E. P. (1967). Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past & Present, 38(1), 56–97.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. Crime and Justice, 30, 283–357.Google Scholar

Velicogna, M. (2007). Justice systems and ICT: What can be learned from Europe? Utrecht Law Review, 3(1), 129–47.Google Scholar

Velicogna, M. (2013). The EU Justice Scoreboard and the challenge of investigating the functioning of EU justice systems and their impact on the economy of the Member States. Paper presented at the SISP Conference.Google Scholar

Velicogna, M. (2014). Legal, material, spatial and temporal dimensions in EU Cross-Border e-Justice procedures. OAP proceedings.Google Scholar

Velicogna, M. (2021). Cross-border civil litigation in the EU: What can we learn from COVID-19 emergency national e-Justice experiences? European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 10(2), 1–25.Google Scholar

Velicogna, M. & Contini, F. (2009). Assemblage-in-the-Making: Developing the e-Services for the Justice of the Peace Office in Italy. In ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector (pp. 211–43). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Velicogna, M., Errera, A. & Derlange, S. (2011). e-Justice in France: The e-Barreau experience. Utrecht Law Review, 7(1), 163–87.Google Scholar

Velicogna, M., Errera, A. & Derlange, S. (2013). Building e-justice in Continental Europe: The TéléRecours experience in France. Utrecht Law Review, 9(1), 38–59.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Whipp, R., Adam, B. & Sabelis, I. (eds) (2002). Making Time: Time and Management in Modern Organisations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yates, J. (2014). Time, History, and Materiality. In Materiality and Time (pp. 17–32). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Zerubavel, E. (1982). The standardisation of time: A sociohistorical perspective. American Journal of Sociology, 88(1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Zerubavel, E. (1985). Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Alombert, A. & Krzykawski, M. (2021). Lexicon of Internation: Introduction to the Concepts of Bernard Stiegler and the Internation Collective. In Stiegler, B. (ed.), Bifurcate: There Is No Alternative (pp. 305–30). London: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Anders, G. (2016). On Promethean Shame. In Müller, C. J. (ed.), Prometheanism. Technology, Digital Culture and Human Obsolescence (pp. 29–96). London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Anteby, M. & Molnár, V. (2012). Collective memory meets organizational identity: Remembering to forget in a firm’s rhetorical history. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 515–40.Google Scholar

Baskerville, R. L., Myers, M. D. & Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital first: The ontological reversal and new challenges for information systems research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 44(2), 509–23.Google Scholar

Beverungen, A. & Lange, A. C. (2018). Cognition in high-frequency trading: The costs of consciousness and the limits of automation. Theory, Culture and Society, 35, 75–95.Google Scholar

Blagoev, B., Felten, S. & Kahn, R. (2018). The career of a catalogue: Organizational memory, materiality and the dual nature of the past at the British Museum (1970–Today). Organization Studies, 39(12), 1757–83.Google Scholar

Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K. & Yoo, Y. (2007). Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science, 18(4), 631–47.Google Scholar

Brandon, D. P. & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15(6), 633–44.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Connerton, P. (1989). How Societies Remember. Cambridge, UK & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coraiola, D. M. & Murcia, M. J. (2019). From organizational learning to organizational mnemonics: Redrawing the boundaries of the field. Management Learning, 51(2), 227–40.Google Scholar

D’Adderio, L. (2003). Configuring software, reconfiguring memories: The influence of integrated systems on the reproduction of knowledge and routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(2), 321–50.Google Scholar

De Vaujany, F-X. & Mitev, N. (2017). The post-Macy paradox, information management and organising: Good intentions and a road to hell? Culture and Organization, 23(5), 379–407.Google Scholar

Ernst, W. (2013). From media history to Zeitkritik. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(6), 132–46.Google Scholar

Faulkner, P. & Runde, J. (2019). Theorizing the digital object. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 43(4), 1278–302.Google Scholar

Fiedler, M. & Welpe, I. (2010). How do organizations remember? The influence of organizational structure on organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31(4), 381–407.Google Scholar

Foroughi, H., Coraiola, D. M., Rintamäki, J., Mena, S. & Foster, W. M. (2020). Organizational Memory Studies. Organization Studies, 41(12), 1725–48.Google Scholar

Foster, W. M., Coraiola, D. M., Suddaby, R., Kroezen, J. & Chandler, D. (2017). The strategic use of historical narratives: A theoretical framework. Business History, 59(8), 1176–1200.Google Scholar

Foster, W. M., Suddaby, R., Minkus, A. & Wiebe, E. (2011). History as social memory assets: The example of Tim Hortons. Management & Organizational History, 6(1), 101–20.Google Scholar

Galloway, A. A. & Thacker, E. (2007). The Exploit: A Theory of Networks. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Halbwachs, M. (1992). On Collective Memory. Trans. L. Coser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. B. (2014). Feed-Forward: On the Future of Twenty-First-Century Media. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hansen, M. B. (2017). Bernard Stiegler, philosopher of desire? Boundary 2, 44(1), 167–91.Google Scholar

Hatch, M. J. & Schultz, M. (2017). Toward a theory of using history authentically: Historicizing in the Carlsberg Group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(4), 657–97.Google Scholar

Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hui, Y. (2016). On the Synthesis of Social Memories. In Blom, I., Lundemo, T. & Røssaak (eds), E., Memory in Motion: Archives, Technology, and the Social (pp. 307–27). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar

Humphries, C. & Smith, A. C. T. (2014). Talking objects: Towards a post-social research framework for exploring object narratives. Organization, 21(4), 477–94.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1991). On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893–1917). Trans. J. B. Brough. London: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Kallinikos, J. & Mariategui, J-C. (2011). Video as digital object: Production and distribution of video content in the internet media ecosystem. The Information Society, 27(5), 281–94.Google Scholar

Landsberg, A. (2004). Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Lange, A.-C., Lenglet, M. & Seyfert, R. (2018). On studying algorithms ethnographically: Making sense of objects of ignorance. Organization, 26(4), 598–617.Google Scholar

Lewis, K. & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254–65.Google Scholar

Mena, S., Rintamaki, J., Fleming, P. & Spicer, A. (2016). On the forgetting of corporate irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 720–38.Google Scholar

Ocasio, W., Mauskapf, M. & Steele, C. W. (2016). History, society, and institutions: The role of collective memory in the emergence and evolution of societal logics. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 676–99.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. & Scott, S. V. (2015). The algorithm and the crowd: Considering the materiality of service innovation. MIS Quarterly, 39, 201–16.Google Scholar

Rowlinson, M., Booth, C., Clark, P., Delahaye, A. & Procter, S. (2010). Social remembering and organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31(1), 69–87.Google Scholar

Sapir, A. (2020). Mythologizing the story of a scientific invention: Constructing the legitimacy of research commercialization. Organization Studies, 41(6), 799–820. doi:10.1177/0170840618814575Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Trans. R. Beardsworth & G. Collins. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. (2009). Technics and Time, 2: Disorientation. Trans. S. Barker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. (2010a). For a New Critique of Political Economy. Trans. D. Ross. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. (2010b). Telecracy against democracy. Cultural Politics, 6(2), 171–80.Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. (2011). Technics and Time, 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise. Trans. S. Barker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. (2016a). The Age of Disruption: Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism. Trans. D. Ross. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. (2016b). Automatic Society, Vol. 1: The Future of Work. Trans. D. Ross. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Stiegler, B. (2020). The Nanjing Lectures 2016–2019. Trans. D. Ross. London: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Walsh, J. P. & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57–91.Google Scholar

Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 213–31.Google Scholar

Zuboff, S. (2018). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Zundel, M., Holt, R. & Popp, A. (2016). Using history in the creation of organizational identity. Management & Organizational History, 11(2), 211–35.Google Scholar

Alexander, S. (1920). Space, Time, and Deity. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Barker, T. S. (2012). Time and the Digital: Connecting Technology, Aesthetics, and a Process Philosophy of Time. London: UPNE.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (1896, 2020). Matière et mémoire. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar

Ciborra, C. (2004). Encountering Information Systems as a Phenomenon. In Avgerou, C., Ciborra, C. & Land, F. (eds), The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology (pp. 17–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ciborra, C. (2006). Imbrication of representations: Risk and digital technologies. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1339–56.Google Scholar

Ciborra, C. U. & Hanseth, O. (1998). From tool to Gestell: Agendas for managing the information infrastructure. Information Technology & People. 11(4), 305–27.Google Scholar

Czarniawska, B. (2004). On time, space, and action nets. Organization, 11(6), 773-91.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. (2022a). Imagining the name of the rose with Deleuze: Organizational and self world-making on the screen. Culture and Organization. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2022.2105338.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. (2022b). Apocalypse managériale. Paris: Editions Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X. & Aroles, J. (2019). Nothing happened, something happened: Silence in a makerspace. Management Learning, 50(2), 208–25.Google Scholar

de Vaujany, F-X., Mitev, N., Laniray, P. & Vaast, E. (2014). Introduction: Time and Materiality: What Is at Stake in the Materialization of Time and Time as a Materialization? In du Vaujany, F-X., Mitev, N., Laniray, P. & Vaast, E. (eds), Materiality and Time (pp. 1–13). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Hernes, T., Feddersen, J. & Schultz, M. (2021). Material temporality: How materiality ‘does’ time in food organizing. Organization Studies, 42(2), 351–71.Google Scholar

Jones, G., McLean, C. & Quattrone, P. (2004). Spacing and timing. Organization, 11(6), 723–41.Google Scholar

Revel, J. (2015). Foucault avec Merleau-Ponty: Ontologie Politique, Présentisme et Histoire. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (2000). L’écriture de l’histoire et la représentation du passé. Annales. Histoire, sciences sociales, 55(4), 731–47.Google Scholar

Seamon, D. (2012). Place, Place Identity, and Phenomenology: A Triadic Interpretation based on J. G. Bennett’s Systematics. In Israel, H. C. & Portugal, F. B. (eds), The Role of Place Identity in the Perception, Understanding, and Design of Built Environments (pp. 3–21). London: Bentham Science Publishers.Google Scholar

Seamon, D. (2018). Life Takes Place: Phenomenology, Lifeworlds, and Place Making. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wahl, J. (1932, 2004). Vers le concret: études d’histoire de la philosophie contemporaine: William James, Whitehead, Gabriel Marcel. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N. (1929, 2010). Process and Reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Whitehead, A. N. (1938, 1968). Modes of Thought. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar