References

J. M. Borwein; M. L. Glasser; R. C. McPhedran; J. G. Wan; I. J. Zucker

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139626804.014

Abramowitz, M. and I. A., Stegun. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables. Dover, New York, 1972.

Adamchik, V.On the Hurwitz function for rational arguments. Appl. Math. Comp., 187: 3–12, 2007.Google Scholar

Adler, S.Generalized Ewald method for lattice sums. Physica (Utrecht), 27: 1193–1201, 1961.Google Scholar

Andrews, G. E., R., Askey, and R., Roy. Special Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.

Appell, P.Sur les transformations des équations différentielles linéaires. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 91:211–214, 1880.Google Scholar

Appell, P.Sur les fonctions de trois variables réelles satisfaisant à l'équation différentielle Δ F = 0. Acta Math., 4:313–374, 1884.Google Scholar

Appell, P.Sur quelques applications de la fonction Z(x, y, z) à la physique mathématique. Acta Math., 8:265–294, 1886.Google Scholar

Appell, P.Sur les fonctions harmoniques à trois groupes de périodes. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 22:361–370, 1906.Google Scholar

Ayoub, R.An Introduction to the Analytic Theory of Numbers. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1963.

Bailey, D. H., J. M., Borwein, D., Broadhurst, and M. L., Glasser. Elliptic integral evaluations of Bessel moments and applications. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 41:205–203, 2008.Google Scholar

Bailey, D. H., J. M., Borwein, R. E., Crandall, and I. J., Zucker. Lattice sums arising from the Poisson equation. J. Phys.A, 46:115201–115232, 2012.Google Scholar

Bailey, W. N.A reducible case of the fourth type of Appell's hypergeometric functions of two variables. Quart. J. Math. Oxford, 4:305–308, 1933.Google Scholar

Bailey, W. N.Some infinite integrals involving Bessel functions. Proc. London Math. Soc., 40: 37–48, 1935.Google Scholar

Baldereschi, A., G., Senatore, and I., Oriani. Madelung energy of the Wigner crystal on lattices with non-equivalent sites. Solid State Commun., 81: 21–22, 1992.Google Scholar

Barber, M. N.Cross-over phenomena in the asymptotic behaviour of lattice sums. J. Phys. A., 10: 2133–2142, 1977.Google Scholar

Bellman, R.A Brief Introduction to Theta Functions. Holt, New York, 1961.

Benson, G. C.A simple formula for evaluating the Madelung constant of a NaCl-type crystal. Can. J. Phys., 34: 888–890, 1956.Google Scholar

Benson, G. C. and H. P., Schreiber. A method for the evaluation of some lattice sums occur¬ring in calculations of physical properties of crystals. II. Can. J. Phys., 33: 529–533, 1955.Google Scholar

Benson, G. C., H. P., Schreiber, and D., Patterson. An examination of Verwey's model for the lattice structure of the free surface of alkali halide crystals. Can. J. Phys., 34: 265–275, 1956.Google Scholar

Benson, G. C. and F., van Zeggeren. Madelung constants of some cubic crystals. J. Chem. Phys., 26:1083–1085, 1957.Google Scholar

Berndt, B. C.Ramanujan's Notebooks Part III. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991.

Berndt, B. C., G., Lamb, and M., Rogers. Two dimensional series evaluations via the elliptic functions of Ramanujan and Jacobi. Ramanujan Journal, 2011.Google Scholar

Bertaut, F.L'énergie électrostatique de réseaux ioniques. J. Phys. Radium, 13: 499–505, 1952.Google Scholar

Bertaut, F.C. R., Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci., 239: 234–235, 1954.

Bertin, M. J.Mesure de Mahler d'hypersurfaces K3. J. Number Theory, 128: 2890–2913, 2008.Google Scholar

Bethe, H.Splitting of terms in crystals. Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 3:137, 1929.

Birman, J. L.Effect of overlap on electrostatic lattice potentials in ionic crystals. Phys. Rev., 97:897–902, 1955.Google Scholar

Blakemore, J. S.Solid State Physics. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1969.

Bogomolny, E. and P., Leboeuf. Statistical properties of the zeros of zeta functions – beyond the Riemann case. Nonlinearity, 7:1155–1167, 1994.Google Scholar

Bonsall, L. and A. A., Maradudin. Some static and dynamical properties of a two-dimensional Wigner crystal. Phys. Rev. B, 15:1959–1973, 1977.Google Scholar

Boon, M. and J., Zak. Coherent states and lattice sums. J. Math. Phys., 19: 2308–2311, 1978.Google Scholar

Born, M.Dynamik der Kristallgitter. Teubner, Leipzig, 1916.

Born, M.Über elektrostatische Gitterpotentiale. Zeitschrift für Physik, 7: 124–140, 1921.Google Scholar

Born, M. and M., Bradburn. The thermodynamics of crystal lattices. II. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 39: 104–113, 1943.Google Scholar

Born, M. and R., Fürth. The stability of crystal lattices. III. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 36:454–465, 1940.Google Scholar

Born, M. and M., Göppert-Mayer. In Handbuch der Physik (S., Fliigge, ed.), vol. 24, Part 2, p. 707. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1933.

Born, M. and A., Landé. The absolute calculation of crystal properties with the help of Bohr's atomic model. Part 2. In Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 1048–1068, 1918.

Born, M. and R. D., Misra.On the stability of crystal lattices. IV. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 36: 466–478, 1940.Google Scholar

Bornemann, F., D., Laurie, S., Wagon, and J., Waldvogel. The SIAM 100-Digit Challenge. SIAM, 2004.

Borwein, D. and J. M., Borwein.A note on alternating series in several dimensions. Amer. Math. Mon., 93:531–539, 1985.Google Scholar

Borwein, D. and J. M., Borwein.Some exponential and trigonometric lattice sums. J. Math. Anal.Appl., 188:209–5218, 1994.Google Scholar

Borwein, D., J. M., Borwein, and C., Pinner. Convergence of Madelung-like lattice sums. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 350:3131–3167, 1998.Google Scholar

Borwein, D., J. M., Borwein, and R., Shail. Analysis of certain lattice sums. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 143:126–137, 1989.Google Scholar

Borwein, D., J. M., Borwein, R., Shail, and I. J., Zucker.Energy of static electron lattices. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 21:1519–1531, 1988.Google Scholar

Borwein, D., J. M., Borwein, and K., Taylor. Convergence of lattice sums and Madelung's constant. J. Math. Phys., 26:2999–3009, 1985.Google Scholar

Borwein, J. M. and D. H., Bailey.Mathematics by Experiment: Plausible Reasoning in the 21st Century, 2nd edition. A. K., Peters, 2008.

Borwein, J. M. and P. B., Borwein.Pi and the AGM - A Study in Analytic Number Theory and Computational Complexity. Wiley, New York, 1987.

Borwein, J. M., P. B., Borwein, and F. G., Garvan.Some cubic modular identities of Ramanujan. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 343:35–47, 1994.Google Scholar

Borwein, J. M. and K.-K. S., Choi. On the representations of xy + yz + zx. Exp. Math., 9: 153–158, 2000.Google Scholar

Borwein, J. M. and A. S., Lewis.Partially-finite convex programming in L 1:entropy maximization. SIAM J. Optimization, 3:248–267, 1993.Google Scholar

Borwein, J. M., A., Straub, and J. G., Wan.Three-step and four-step random walk integrals. Exp. Math., 22:1–14, 2013.Google Scholar

Borwein, J. M., A., Straub, J. G., Wan, and W., Zudilin. Densities of short uniform random walks. Can. J. Math., 64:961–990, 2012, with an appendix by Don Zagier.Google Scholar

Borwein, J. M. and J., Vanderwerff. Convex Functions: Constructions, Characterizations and Counterexamples. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 109, Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Borwein, J. M. and I. J., Zucker.Elliptic integral evaluation of the Gamma function at rational values of small denominator. IMA J. Numer. Anal., 12:519–526, 1992.Google Scholar

Borwein, J. M. and R. E., Crandall.Closed forms: what they are and why we care. Not. Amer. Math. Soc., 60(1):60–65, 2013.Google Scholar

Boyd, D. W.Mahler's measure and special values of L-functions. Exp. Math., 7: 37–82, 1998.Google Scholar

Broadhurst, D.Elliptic integral evaluation of a Bessel moment by contour integration of a lattice Green function. 2008. Preprint: arXiv:0801.0891v1.

Brown, E. and C. J., Parry.The imaginary bicyclic biquadratic fields with class number 1. J. Reine Angew. Math., 266:118–120, 1974.Google Scholar

Buhler, J. P. and R. E., Crandall.On the convergence problem for lattice sums. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 23:2523–2528, 1990.Google Scholar

Burrows, E. L. and S. F. A., Kettle. Madelung constants and other lattice sums. J. Chem. Ed., 52: 58–59, 1975.Google Scholar

Campbell, E. S.Existence of a well defined specific energy for an ionic crystal – justification of Ewald's formulae and of their use to deduce equations for multipole lattices. J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 24:197, 1963.Google Scholar

Cayley, A.The Collected Mathematical Papers, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1889.

Cayley, A.An Elementary Treatise on Elliptic Functions, 2nd edition. Deighton, Bell and Co., 1895.

Chaba, A. N. and R. K., Pathria.Evaluation of a class of lattice sums in arbitrary dimensions. J. Math. Phys., 16:1457–1460, 1975.Google Scholar

Chaba, A. N. and R. K., Pathria.Evaluation of lattice sums using Poisson's summation formula. 2. J. Phys. A, 9:1411–1423, 1976a.Google Scholar

Chaba, A. N. and R. K., Pathria.Evaluation of lattice sums using Poisson's summation formula. 3. J. Phys. A, 9:1801–1810, 1976b.Google Scholar

Chaba, A. N. and R. K., Pathria.Evaluation of lattice sums using Poisson's summation formula. 4. J. Phys. A, 10:1823–1832, 1977.Google Scholar

Chen, L. C. and F. Y., Wu.The random cluster model and a new integration identity. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 38:6271–6276, 1005.Google Scholar

Chin, S. K., N. A., Nicorovici, and R. C., McPhedran.Green's function and lattice sums for electromagnetic scattering by a square array of cylinders. Phys.Rev.E, 49, 1994.

Chowla, S.An extension of Heilbronn's class number theorem. Quart. J. Math. Oxford, 5: 304–307, 1934.Google Scholar

Clausen, T.Ueber die Fälle wenn die Reihe ein Quadrat von der Form hat. J. Math., 3:89–95, 1828.Google Scholar

Clausius, R.Die Mechanische Behandlung der Electricität. Braunschweig, Vieweg, 1879.

Cockayne, E.Comment on ‘stability of the Wigner electron crystal on the perovskite lattice’. J. Phys: Condens. Matter, 3:8757, 1991.Google Scholar

Cohn, H.A Classical Invitation to Algebraic Numbers and Class Fields. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1978.

Coldwell-Horsfall, R. A. and A. A., Maradudin. Zero point energy of an electron lattice. J. Math. Phys., 1: 395–404, 1960.Google Scholar

Colquitt, D. J., M. J., Nieves, I. S., Jones, A. B., Movchan, and N. V., Movchan.Localisation for an infinite line defect in an infinite square lattice. Preprint: arXiv:1208.1871v2:1-24, 2012.

Conrey, J. B.The Riemann hypothesis. Not. Amer. Math. Soc., 50:341–353, 2003.Google Scholar

Courant, R.Über partielle Differenzengleichung. In Proc. Atti Congresso Internazionale Dei Matematici, Bologna, vol. 3, pp. 83–89, 1929.Google Scholar

Courant, R., K., Friedrichs, and H., Lewy. Über die partiellen Differenzengleichung der mathematischen Physik. Math. Ann., 100:32–74, 1928.Google Scholar

Crandall, R. E.New representations for the Madelung constant. Exp. Math., 8: 367–379, 1999.Google Scholar

Crandall, R. E.The Poisson equation and ‘natural’ Madelung constants. 2012. Preprint.

R. E., Crandall and J. P., Buhler.Elementary function expansions for Madelung constants. J. Math. Phys., 20:5497–5510, 1987.Google Scholar

R. E., Crandall and J. F., Delord.The potential within a crystal lattice. J. Math. Phys., 20: 2279–2292, 1987.Google Scholar

Davies, H.Poisson's partial differential equation. Quart. J. Math, 6:232–240, 1955.Google Scholar

De Wette, F. W.Electric field gradients in pointion and uniform-background lattices. Phys. Rev., 123:103, 1961.Google Scholar

De Wette, F. W. and G. E., Schacher.Internal fields in general dipole lattices. Phys.Rev. A, 137: 78–91, 1965.Google Scholar

Delves, R. T. and G. S., Joyce.On the Green function for the anisotropic simple cubic lattice. Ann. Phys., 291:71–133, 2001.Google Scholar

Delves, R. T. and G. S., Joyce.Exact product form for the anisotropic simple cubic lattice Green function. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 39:4119–4145, 2006.Google Scholar

Delves, R. T. and G. S., Joyce.Derivation of exact product forms for the simple cubic lattice Green function using Fourier generating functions and Lie group identities. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 40: 8329–8343, 2007.Google Scholar

Deninger, C.Deligne periods of mixed motives, K-theory and the entropy of certain Zn – actions. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 10:259–281, 1997.Google Scholar

Dickson, L. E.An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers. Dover, New York, 1957.

Dietz, B. and K., Zyczkowski. Level-spacing distributions beyond the Wigner surmise. Z. Phys. Condens. Matter, 84:157–158, 1991.Google Scholar

Domb, C.On multiple returns in the random walk problem. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 50: 586–591, 1954.Google Scholar

Doyle, P. G. and L. J., Snell.Random Walks and Electric Networks. Carus Mathematical Monographs, MAA, 1984.

Duffin, R. J.Discrete potential theory. Duke Math. J., 20:233–251, 1953.Google Scholar

Emersleben, O.Zetafunktionen und elektrostatische Gitterpotentiale. I. Phys. Z., 24:73–80, 1923a.Google Scholar

Emersleben, O.Zetafunktionen und elektrostatische Gitterpotentiale. II. Phys. Z., 24:97–104, 1923b.Google Scholar

Emersleben, O.Die elektrostatische Gitterenergie eines neutralen ebenen, insbesondere alternierenden quadratischen Gitters. Z. Phys., 127:588–609, 1950a.Google Scholar

Emersleben, O.Über die Berechnung der Gitterenergie endlicher Kristallstücke. Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 30:252–254, 1950b.Google Scholar

Emersleben, O.Über die Konvergenz der Reihen Epsteinscher Zetafunktionen, Math. Nachr., 4: 468–480, 1951.Google Scholar

Emersleben, O.Z. Phys. Chem., 194: 170–190, 1952.

Emersleben, O.Über Summen Epsteinscher Zetafunktionen regelmäßig verteilter ‘unterer’ Parameter. Math. Nachr., 13: 59–72, 1954.Google Scholar

Emersleben, O.Über Funktionalgleichungen zwischen Epsteinscher Zetafunktionen gleichen Arguments. Math. Nachr., 44: 205–230, 1970.Google Scholar

Engblom, S.Gaussian quadratures with respect to discrete measures. Uppsala University Technical Reports, 7: 1–17, 2006.Google Scholar

Epstein, P.Zur Theorie allgemeiner Zetafunktionen. Math. Ann., 56: 615–644, 1903.Google Scholar

Evjen, H.On the stability of certain heteropolar crystals. Phys. Rev., 39: 675–687, 1932.Google Scholar

Ewald, P.Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale. Ann. Phys., 64: 253–287, 1921.Google Scholar

Ferguson, Helaman and Claire, Ferguson. Sculpture inspired by work with Alfred Gray: Kepler elliptic curves and minimal surface sculptures of the planets. Contemp. Math., 288: 39–53, 2000.Google Scholar

Fetter, A. L.Evaluation of lattice sums for clean type-II superconductors. Phys. Rev. B, 11: 2049–2052, 1975.Google Scholar

Foldy, L. L.Electrostatic stability of Wigner and Wigner-Dyson lattices. Phys. Rev. B, 17: 4889–4894, 1978.Google Scholar

Folsom, A., W., Kohnen, and S., Robins. Conic theta functions and their relations to theta functions. 2011. Preprint.

Forrester, P. J. and M. L., Glasser.Some new lattice sums including an exact result for the electrostatic potential within the NaCl lattice. J. Phys. A, 15:911–914, 1982.Google Scholar

Fuchs, K.A quantum mechanical investigation of the cohesive forces of metallic copper. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 151: 585–602, 1935.Google Scholar

Fumi, F. G. and M. P., Tosi.On the Naor relations between Madelung constants for cubic ionic lattices. Phil. Mag., 2:284, 1957.Google Scholar

Fumi, F. G. and M. P., Tosi.Extension of the Madelung method for the evaluation of lattice sums. Phys. Rev., 117:1466–1468, 1960.Google Scholar

Garnett, J. C. M.Colours in metal glasses and in metallic films. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 203:385–420, 1904.Google Scholar

Glaisher, J. W. L.Messenger ofMathematics, vol. 24, p. 27, 1895.

Glasser, M. L.A Watson sum for a cubic lattice. J. Math. Phys., 13:1145, 1972.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L.The evaluation of lattice sums. I. Analytic procedures. J. Math. Phys., 14:409–413, 1973a.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L.The evaluation of lattice sums. II. Number-theoretic approach. J. Math. Phys., 14:701–703, 1973b.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L.The evaluation of lattice sums. III. Phase modulated sums. J. Math. Phys., 15: 188–189, 1974.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L.The evaluation of lattice sums. IV. A five-dimensional sum. J. Math. Phys., 16: 1237–1238, 1975.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L.Definite integrals of the complete elliptic integral K. J. Res. NBS., 80B:313–323, 1976.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L.A note on a hyper-cubic Mahler measure and associated Bessel integral. J. Phys. A, 45:494002, 2012.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L. and G., Lamb. A lattice spanning tree entropy function. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 38:L471–L475, 2005.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L. and E., Montaldi. Staircase polygons and recurrent lattice walks. Phys. Rev. E, 48:2339–2342, 1993.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L. and V. E., Wood.A closed form evaluation of the elliptical integral. Math. Comput., 25: 535–536, 1971.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L. and F. Y., Wu.On the entropy of spanning trees on a large triangular lattice. Ramanujan Journal, 10:205–214, 2005.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L. and I. J., Zucker.Extended Watson integrals for the cubic lattices. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 74:1800–1801, 1977.Google Scholar

Glasser, M. L. and I. J., Zucker.Lattice sums. In Theoretical Chemistry, Advances and Perspectives (H., Eyring and D., Henderson, eds.), vol. 5, pp. 67–139, 1980.

Gordon, B. Some identities in combinatorial analysis. Quart. J. Math., 12:285–290, 1961.Google Scholar

Goursat, E.Sur l'équation différentielle linéaire qui admet pour intégrale la série hypergéometrique. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup., 10:S3–S142, 1881.Google Scholar

Graovac, A., H. J., Monkhorst, and M. L., Glasser.Computation of Fourier transform quantities in Hartree-Fock calculations for simple crystals. Int. J. Quantum Chem., 9: 243–259, 1975.Google Scholar

Greenspan, N. T.The End ofthe Certain World: The Life and Science of Max Born. Basic Books, 2005.

Guillera, J. and M., Rogers. Ramanujan series upside-down. Preprint. Submitted for publication on 18 June 2012.

Guttmann, A. J.Lattice Green functions in all dimensions. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 43:305205, 2010.Google Scholar

Guttmann, A. J. and T., Prellberg. Staircase polygons, elliptic integrals, Heun functions, and lattice Green functions. Phys. Rev. E, 47:R2233–R2236, 1993.Google Scholar

Guttmann, A. J. and M., Rogers. An integral arising from the chiral sl(n) Potts model. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 46:045202, 2013.Google Scholar

Guttmann, A. J. and M., Rogers. Spanning tree generating functions and Mahler measures. J. Phys. A, to appear.

Guy, R. K.Gauss' lattice point problem. In Unsolved Problems in Number Theory, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.

Hall, G. E.Asymptotic properties of generalized Chaba and Pathria lattice sums. J. Math. Phys., 17:259–260, 1976a.Google Scholar

Hall, G. E.Weak phase transitions in asymptotic properties of lattice sums. J. Stat. Phys., 14:521–524, 1976b.Google Scholar

Hall, G. E.Order relations for lattice sums from order relations for theta functions. J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 38:367–373, 1977.Google Scholar

Hardy, G. H.On some definite integral considered by Mellin. Messenger of Mathematics, vol. 49, pp. 85–91, 1919.Google Scholar

Hardy, G. H. and M., Riesz. The General Theory ofDirichlet Series. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1915.

Hardy, G. H. and E. M., Wright.An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 4th edition. Clarendon, Oxford, 1960.

Harris, F. E. and H. J., Monkhorst.Electronic-structure studies of solids. I. Fourier representation method for Madelung sums. Phys. Rev. B, 2: 4400–4405, 1970.Google Scholar

Hautot, A.A new method for the evaluation of slowly convergent series. J. Math. Phys., 15: 1722–1727, 1974.Google Scholar

Hautot, A.New applications of Poisson's summation formula. J. Phys. A, 8:853–862, 1975.Google Scholar

Heller, W. R. and A., Marcus. A note on the propagation of excitation in an idealized crystal. Phys. Rev., 84:809–813, 1951.Google Scholar

Hioe, F. T.A Green's function for a cubic lattice. J. Math. Phys., 19:1064–1067, 1978.Google Scholar

Hirschhorn, M., F., Garvan, and J. M., Borwein.Cubic analogues of the Jacobian theta function 0(q, z). J. Math. Phys., 19:1064, 1978.Google Scholar

Højendahl, K.K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Medd., 16:135, 1938.

Hoskins, C. S., M. L., Glasser, and E. R., Smith.Half-space electrostatic sums. J. Phys. A, 10: 879–884, 1977.Google Scholar

Hove, J. and J. A., Krumhansl.The evaluation of lattice sums for cubic crystals. Phys. Rev., 92: 569–572, 1953.Google Scholar

Hund, F.Versuch einer Ableitung der Gittertypen aus der Vorstellung des isotropen polarisierbaren Ions. Z. Phys., 34:833–857, 1925.Google Scholar

Hund, F.Vergleich der elektrostatischen Energien einiger Ionengitter. Z. Phys., 94: 11–21, 1935.Google Scholar

Huxley, M. N.Exponential sums and lattice points II. Proc. London Math. Soc., 66:279–301, 1993.Google Scholar

Iwata, G.Evaluation of the Watson integral of a face-centered lattice. Nat. Sci. Report, Ochanomizu University, 20:13–18, 1969.Google Scholar

Jacobi, C. G.Fundamenta Nova Theoriae Functionum Ellipticarum. Konigsberg, 1829.

Jacobi, C. G.Gesammelte Werke, vol. 3. Chelsea, New York, 1969.

Jones, D. S.Generalized Functions. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966.

Jones, J. E.On the determination of molecular fields. III. From crystal measurements and kinetic theory data. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 106:709–718, 1924.Google Scholar

Jones, J. E. and B. M., Dent.Cohesion at a crystal surface. Trans. Faraday Soc., 24: 92–108, 1928.Google Scholar

Jones, J. E. and A. E., Ingham.On the calculation of certain crystal potential constants, and on the cubic crystal of least potential energy. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 107: 636–653, 1925.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S.Lattice Green function for the anisotropic face centred cubic lattice. J. Phys. C, 4:L53–L56, 1971.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S.Lattice Green function for the simple cubic lattice. J. Phys. A, 5:L65–L68, 1972.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S.On the simple cubic lattice Green function. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, A273:583–610, 1973.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S.On the cubic lattice Green functions. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A455:463–477, 1994.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S.On the cubic modular transformation and the cubic lattice Green functions. J. Math. A: Math. Gen., 31:5105–5115, 1998.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S.Singular behaviour of the cubic lattice Green functions and associated integrals. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 34:3831–3839, 2001.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S.Application of Mahler measure theory to the face-centred cubic lattice Green function at the origin and its associated logarithmic integral. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 45:285001, 2012.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S. and R. T., Delves.Exact product forms for the simple cubic lattice Green functions: I. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 37:3645–3671, 2004.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S. and R. T., Delves.Exact product forms for the simple cubic lattice Green functions: II. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 37:5417–5447, 2004.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S., R. T., Delves, and I. J., Zucker.Exact evaluation of the Baxter-Bazhanov Green function. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 31:1781–1790, 1998.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S., R. T., Delves, and I. J., Zucker.Exact evaluation for the anisotropic face-centred and simple cubic lattices. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 36: 8661–8672, 2003.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S. and I. J., Zucker.Evaluation of the Watson integral and associated logarithmic integral for the d-dimensional hypercubic lattice. J. Phys. A, 34: 7349–7354, 2001.Google Scholar

Joyce, G. S. and I. J., Zucker.On the evaluation of generalized Watson integrals. Proc. AMS, 133:71–81, 2004.Google Scholar

Kac, V. G.Infinite-dimensional algebras, Dedekind's η-function, classical Möbius function and the very strange formula. Adv. Math., 30:85–136, 1978.Google Scholar

Kanamori, J., T., Moriya, K., Motizuki, and T., Nagamiya. Methods of calculating the crystalline electric field. J. Phys. Soc., 10:93–102, 1956.Google Scholar

Kanemitsu, S., Y., Tanigawa, K., Tsukada, and M., Yoshimoto. Crystal symmetry viewed as zeta symmetry. Chapter 9 in Zeta Functions, Topology and Quantum Physics. Springer, 2005.

Kanemitsu, S. and H., Tsukada. The Legacy ofAlladi Ramakrishnan in the Mathematical Sciences: Crystal Symmetry Viewed as Zeta Symmetry II. Springer, 2010.

Kendall, J.The abnormality of strong electrolytes and the ionization theory of Ghosh. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 44: 717–738, 1922.Google Scholar

Kittel, C.Introduction to Solid State Physics. Wiley, New York, 1953.

Köhler, G.Some eta-identities arising from theta series. Math. Scand., 66: 147–154, 1990.Google Scholar

Kornfeld, H.Die Berechnung elektrostatischer Potentiale und der Energie von Dipol- und Quadrupolgittern. Z. Phys., 22: 27–43, 1924.Google Scholar

Krätzel, E.Bemerkungen zu einem Gitterpunkte. Math. Ann., 179: 90–96, 1969.Google Scholar

Krätzel, E. and W., Nowak. Lattice points in large convex bodies, II. Acta Arith., 62:285–295, 1992.Google Scholar

Krazer, A. and E., Prym. Neue Grundlagen einer Theorie der Allgemeinen Thetafunktionen. Teubner, Leipzig, 1893.

Kummer, E. E.Uber die hypergeometrische Reihe. J. Reine Angew. Math., 15:39–83, 127–172, 1836.Google Scholar

Landau, E.Über eine Aufgabe aus der Theorie der quadratischen Formen. Wien. Sitzungsber., 124: 445–468, 1915.Google Scholar

Landau, E.Zur analytischen Zahlentheorie der definiten quadratischen Formen (über Gitterpunkte in mehrdimensionalen Ellipsoiden). S. B. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., 458–476, 1915.Google Scholar

Landau, E.Über Gitterpunkte in mehrdimensionalen Ellipsoiden. Math. Zeit., 21: 126–132, 1924.Google Scholar

Landau, E.Über Gitterpunkte in mehrdimensionalen Ellipsoiden. Zweite Abhandlung. Math. Zeit., 24:299–310, 1926.Google Scholar

Landau, E.Vorselungen über Zahlentheorie, vol. 2, Part 8, Chapter 6. Chelsea, New York, 1955.

Landauer, R.Electrical conductivity in inhomogeneous media. In Proc.Amer. Inst.Phys. Conf., vol. 40, pp. 2–45, 1978.Google Scholar

Landé, A.Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges., 20:217, 1918.

Lin, Y. K.Staggered ice-rule vertex model on the Kagome lattice. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 8: 1899–1919, 1975.Google Scholar

Linton, C. M.Lattice sums for the Helmholtz equation. SIAM Review, 52: 630–674, 2010.Google Scholar

Lorentz, H. A.The Theory of Electrons. B. G. Teubner, Leipzig, 1909. Reprint: Dover, New York, 1952.

Lorenz, L.Bidrag tiltalienes theori. Tidsskrift Math., 1:97–114, 1871.Google Scholar

Lorenz, L.Wiedemannsche Ann., 11:70, 1880.

Mackenzie, J. K.General relation between lattice sums. J. Chem. Phys., 26:1769, 1957.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, J. K.A simple formula for evaluating the Madelung constant of a NaCl-type crystal. Can. J. Phys., 35: 500–501, 1957.Google Scholar

Madelung, E.Das elektrische Feld in Systemen von regelmäßig angeordneten Punktladungen. Phys. Z., 19: 524–533, 1918.Google Scholar

Madras, N., C. E., Soteros, S. G., Whittington, et al. The free energy of a collapsing branched polymer. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 23: 5327–5350, 1990.Google Scholar

Maradudin, A. A., E. W., Montroll, G. H., Weiss, R., Herman, and W. H., Miles.Green's Functions for Monatomic Simple Cubic Lattices. Académie Royale de Belgique, 1960.

Maradudin, A. A. and G. H., Weiss.A method for evaluating lattice sums. Can. J. Phys., 37: 170–173, 1959.Google Scholar

Martin, Y. and K., Ono. Eta-quotients and elliptic curves. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 125:3169–3176, 1997.Google Scholar

McCrea, W. H.A problem on random paths. Math. Gazette, 20:311–317, 1936.Google Scholar

McCrea, W. H. and F. J. W., Whipple. Random paths in two and three dimensions. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 60:281–298, 1940.Google Scholar

McKean, P. and V., Moll. Elliptic Curves: Function Theory, Geometry, Arithmetic. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1997.

McNeil, M. B.Electrostatic energies calculated by plane-wise summation. J. Phys. C, 3: 2020–2021, 1970.Google Scholar

McPhedran, R. C., L. C., Botten, N. P., Nicorovici, and I. J., Zucker.Systematic investigation of two-dimensional static array sums. J. Math. Phys., 48:033501, 2007.Google Scholar

McPhedran, R. C., L. C., Botten, N. P., Nicorovici, and I. J., Zucker.On the Riemann property of angular lattice sums and the one-dimensional limit of two-dimensional lattice sums. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 464:3327–3352, 2008.Google Scholar

McPhedran, R. C., L. C., Botten, D. J., Williamson, and N. A., Nicorovici.The Riemann hypothesis and the zero distribution of angular lattice sums. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 467: 2462–2478, 2011.Google Scholar

McPhedran, R. C., G. H., Smith, N. A., Nicorovici, and L. C., Botten.Distributive and analytic properties of lattice sums. J. Math. Phys., 45: 2560–2578, 2004.Google Scholar

Miller, J. Jr. Lie Theory and Special Functions. Academic Press, New York, 1968.

Misra, R.On the stability of crystal lattices. II. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 36: 173–182, 1940.Google Scholar

Mityushev, V. V.Transport properties of doubly-periodic arrays of circular cylinders. Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 77: 115–120, 1997.Google Scholar

Mityushev, V. V. and P. M., Adler.Longitudinal permeability of spatially periodic rectangular arrays of circular cylinders. I. A single cylinder in the unit cell. Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 82: 335–345, 2002.Google Scholar

Molière, G.Z. Kristallogr., 101:383, 1939.

Monien, H.Gaussian quadrature for sums: a rapidly convergent summation scheme. Math. Comp., 79: 857–869, 2010.Google Scholar

Montaldi, E.The evaluation of Green's functions for cubic lattices, revisited. Lettera al Nuovo Cimento, 30:403–409, 1981.Google Scholar

Montroll, E. W.Theory of the vibration of simple cubic lattices with nearest neighbor interaction. In Proc. 3rd Berkeley Symp. on Math. Stats. and Probability, vol.3, pp. 209–246, 1956.Google Scholar

Moroz, A.On the computation of the free-space doubly-periodic Green's function of the three-dimensional Helmholtz equation. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl., 16: 457–465, 2002.Google Scholar

Mossotti, O. F.Memorie di Matematica e di Fisica della Società Italiana delle Scienze Residente inModena, 24:49–74, 1850.

Movchan, A. B., N. A., Nicorovici, and R. C., McPhedran.Green's tensors and lattice sums for elastostatics and elastodynamics. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 453: 643–662, 1997.Google Scholar

Naor, P.Linear dependence of lattice sums. Z. Kristallogr. Kristallgeom., 110: 112–126, 1958.Google Scholar

Nicholson, M. M.Surface tension in ionic crystals. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 228:490–510, 1955.Google Scholar

Nicorovici, N. A., C. G., Poulton, and R. C., McPhedran.Analytical results for a class of sums involving Bessel functions and square arrays. J. Math. Phys., 37: 2043–2052, 1996.Google Scholar

Nijboer, B. R. A. and F. W., de Wette. On the calculation of lattice sums. Physica (Utrecht), 23: 309–321, 1957.Google Scholar

Nijboer, B. R. A. and F. W., de Wette. The internal field in dipole lattices. Physica (Utrecht), 24: 422–431, 1958.Google Scholar

Novâk, B.Über eine Methode der Ω-abschätzungen. Czech. Math. J., 21:257–279, 1971.Google Scholar

Novâk, B.New proofs of a theorem of Edmund Landau. Acta Arith., 31:101–105, 1976.Google Scholar

Olver, F. W. J., D. W., Lozier, R. F., Boisvert, and C. W., Clark (eds.). NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010.

Ornstein, L. S. and F., Zernike. Magnetische eigenschappen van cubische Kristalnetten. Proc. K. Akad. Wet. Amst., 21:911, 1918.Google Scholar

Peng, H. W. and S. C., Powers.On the stability of crystal lattices. VIII. Stability of rhombohedral Bravais lattices. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 38:67–81, 1942.Google Scholar

Perrins, W. T., D. R., McKenzie, and R. C., McPhedran.Transport properties of regular arrays of cylinders. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 369:207–225, 1979.Google Scholar

Peters, M.The Diophantine equation xy + yz + xz = n and indecomposable binary quadratic forms. Exp. Math., 13:273–274, 2004.Google Scholar

Petkovsek, M., H., Wilf, and D., Zeilberger. A = B.A. K. Peters, Wellesley, 1996.

Placzek, G., B. R. A., Nijboer, and L., van Hove. Effect of short wavelength interference on neutron scattering by dense systems of heavy nuclei. Phys. Rev., 82:392–403, 1951.Google Scholar

Pölya, G.Uber eine Aufgabe der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie betreffend die Irrfahrt im Strassennetz. Math. Ann., 84:149–60, 1921.Google Scholar

Poulton, C. G., L. C., Botten, R. C., McPhedran, and A. B., Movchan.Source-neutral Green's functions for periodic problems and their equivalents in electromagnetism. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 455: 1107–1123, 1999.Google Scholar

Prudnikov, A. P., Y. A., Brychkov, and O. I., Marichev.Integrals and Series. 1. Elementary Functions. Gordon and Breach, New York, 1986.

Ramanujan, S.Modular equations and approximations to π. Quart. J. Math., 45: 350–372, 1914.Google Scholar

Ramanujan, S.On certain arithmetical functions. Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc., 22: 159–184, 1916.Google Scholar

Rashid, M.A. Lattice Green's functions for cubic lattices. J. Math. Phys., 21: 2549–2552, 1980.Google Scholar

Rayleigh, Lord. On the influence of obstacles arranged in rectangular order upon the properties of a medium. Phil. Mag., 34: 481–502, 1892.Google Scholar

Redlack, A. and J., Grindlay. The electrostatic potential in a finite ionic crystal. Can. J. Phys, 50: 2815–2825, 1972.Google Scholar

Redlack, A. and J., Grindlay. Coulombic potential lattice sums. J. Phys. Chem. Solid, 36:73–82, 1975.Google Scholar

Riesz, M.Sur un théorème de la moyenne et ses applications. Acta Univ. Hungaricae Franc.-Jos., 1: 114–126, 1923.Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Villegas, F.Modular Mahler measures I. In Topics in Number Theory, pp. 17–48. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999.

Rogers, M.New5F4 hypergeometric transformations, three-variable Mahlermeasures, and formulas for 1/π. Ramanujan Journal, 18:327–340, 2009.Google Scholar

Rogers, M.Hypergeometric formulas for lattice sums and Mahler measures. IMRN, 17: 4027–4058, 2011.Google Scholar

Rogers, M., J. G., Wan, and I. J., Zucker.Moments of elliptical integrals and critical L-values. Preprint: arXiv:1303.2259, 2013.

Rogers, M. and W., Zudilin. From L-series of elliptic curves to Mahler measures. Compositio Math., 148: 385–414, 2012.Google Scholar

Rosengren, A.On the number of spanning trees for the 3D simple cubic lattice. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 20:L923–L927, 1987.Google Scholar

Rudge, W. E.Generalized Ewald potential problem. Phys. Rev., 181:1020–1024, 1969.Google Scholar

Sakamoto, Y.Madelung constants of simple crystals expressed in terms of Born's basic potentials of 15 figures. J. Chem. Phys., 28:164–165, 1958.Google Scholar

Sakamoto, Y.J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ., 27:111, 1964.

Sakamoto, Y.J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ., 38: 239–270, 1974.

Schoeneberg, B.Elliptic Modular Functions. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974.

Selberg, A. and S., Chowla. On Epstein's zeta function (I). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 35: 371–374, 1949.Google Scholar

Selberg, A. and S., Chowla. On Epstein's zeta-function. J. Reine Angew. Math., 227: 86–110, 1967.Google Scholar

Sherman, J.Crystal energies of ionic compounds and thermochemical applications. Chem. Rev., 11:93–170, 1932.Google Scholar

Sholl, C. A.The calculation of electrostatic energies of metals by plane-wise summation. Proc. Phys. Soc., 92:434–445, 1967.Google Scholar

Shrock, R. and F. Y., Wu.Spanning trees on graphs and lattices in d-dimensions. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 33:3881–3902, 2000.Google Scholar

Smith, H. J. S.Report on the Theory of Numbers. Chelsea, New York, 1865.

Srivastava, H. M. and J., Choi. Series Associated with the Zeta and Related Functions. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2001.

Stepanets, G. F. and A. A., Lopatkin.Russ. J. Phys. Chem. (Engl. Transl.), 41: 1481–1484, 1967.

Stewart, I.How to Cut a Cake and Other Mathematical Conundrums. Oxford University Press, New York, 2006.

Takahasi, U. and Y., Sakamoto. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ., 24:118–130, 1960.

Taylor, P. R.On the Riemann zeta function. Quart. J. Oxford, 16:1–21, 1945.Google Scholar

Temperley, H. N. V.Combinatorics. In Proc. Oxford Conf. on Combinatorial Mathematics, pp. 356–357, 1972.

Tikson, M.Tabulation of an integral arising in the theory of cooperative phenomena. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stds., 50:177–178, 1953.Google Scholar

Titchmarsh, E. C.The Theory ofthe Riemann Zeta Function. Oxford University Press, London and New York, 1951.

Topping, J.On the mutual potential energy of a plane network of doublets. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A, 114:67–72, 1927.Google Scholar

Tosi, M. P.Cohesion of ionic solids in the Born model. Solid State Phys., 16:1, 1964.Google Scholar

Tyagi, S.New series representation for the Madelung constant. Progr. Theor. Phys., 114: 517–521, 2005.Google Scholar

van der Hoff, B. M. E. and C. L., Benson.A method for the evaluation of some lattice sums occurring in calculations of physical properties of crystals. Can. J. Phys., 31:1087–1094, 1953.Google Scholar

van Pepye, W. F. ZürTheorie der magnetischen anisotropic kubischer Kristalle beim absoluten Nullpunkt. Physica, 5:465–82, 1938.Google Scholar

Waddington, T. C.Lattice energies and their significance in inorganic chemistry. Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem., 1:157, 1959.Google Scholar

Walfisz, A.Über Gitterpunkte in mehrdimensionalen Ellipsoiden. Math. Zeit., 19: 300–307, 1924.Google Scholar

Walfisz, A.Convergence abscissae of certain Dirichlet series. Akad. Nauk Gruzin. SSR. Trudy Tbiliss. Mat. Inst. Razmadze, 22:33–75, 1956.Google Scholar

Wan, J. G.Moments of products of elliptic integrals. Adv. Appl. Math., 48:121–141, 2012.Google Scholar

Watson, G. N.The expansion of products of hypergeometric functions. Quart. J. Math., 39: 27–51, 1908.Google Scholar

Watson, G. N.A Treatise on the Theory ofBessel Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1922.

Watson, G. N.Three triple integrals. Quart. J. Math. Oxford, 10:266–276, 1939.Google Scholar

Whittaker, E. T. and G. N., Watson.A Course ofModern Analysis, 4th edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1946.

Wigner, E. P.On the interaction of electrons in metals. Phys. Rev., 46:1002–1011, 1934.Google Scholar

Wilton, J. R.A series of Bessel functions connected with the theory of lattice points. Proc. London Math. Soc., 29:168–188, 1928.Google Scholar

Wu, F. Y.Number of spanning trees on a lattice. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 10:L113–115, 1977.Google Scholar

Y., Zhou. Legendre functions, spherical rotations, and multiple elliptic integrals. arXiv:1301.1735 [math. CA], preprint, 2013.

Zucker, I. J.Exact results for some lattice sums in 2, 4, 6 and 8 dimensions. J. Phys. A, 7: 1568–1575, 1974.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J.Madelung constants and lattice sums for invariant cubic lattice complexes and certain tetragonal structures. J. Phys. A, 8:1734–1745, 1975.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J.New Jacobian θ functions and the evaluation of lattice sums. J. Math. Phys., 16: 2189–2191, 1975.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J.Functional equations for poly-dimensional zeta functions and the evaluation of Madelung constants. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 9: 499–505, 1976.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J.The evaluation in terms of Γ-functions of the periods of elliptic curves admitting complex multiplication. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 82: 111–118, 1977.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J.The summation of series of hyperbolic functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 10: 192–206, 1979.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J.Some infinite series of exponential and hyperbolic functions. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 15:406–413, 1984.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J.Further relations amongst infinite series and products II. The evaluation of 3-dimensional lattice sums. J. Phys. A, 23:117–132, 1990.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J.Stability of the Wigner electron crystal on the perovskite lattice. J. Phys: Condens. Matter, 3:2595–2596, 1991.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J.70 years of the Watson integrals. J. Stat. Phys., 143: 591–612, 2011.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J. and R. C., McPhedran.Problem 11294. Amer. Math. Monthly, 114:452, 2007.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J. and M. M., Robertson.Some properties of Dirichlet L-series. J. Phys. A, 9: 1207–1214, 1976.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J. and M. M., Robertson.Systematic approach to the evaluation of. J. Phys. A, 9: 1215–1225, 1976.Google Scholar

Zucker, I. J. and M. M., Robertson.Further aspects of the evaluation of. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 95: 5–13, 1984.Google Scholar

Zvengrowski, P. and F., Saidak. On the modulus of the Riemann zeta function in the critical strip. Math. Slovaca, 53: 145–272, 2003.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive