Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:33:09.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Other References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Yorick Wilks
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, D. (1965) Studies in Phonetics and Linguistics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1957) On the Linguistic Study of Languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, R. and Greenough, L. (Eds.) (1888) Caesar's Gallic War. London.Google Scholar
Amsler, R. A. (1980) ‘The Structure of the Merriam-Webster Pocket Dictionary’. PhD dissertation, Technical Report TR-164, University of Texas at Austin.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1959) An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1956–7) ‘A Plea for Excuses, Presidential Address’. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 56 pp. 12–20.
Baird, A. (1966) ‘Transformation and Sequence in Pronunciation Teaching’. English Language Teaching, vol. 20, pp. 71–9.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1953) ‘The Present State of Research on Mechanical Translation’. American Documentation, 2, pp. 229–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y.(1960) ‘The Present Status of Automatic Translation of Languages’. In: Advances in Computers (Alt, F. L., Ed.) Academic Press, New York, vol. 1, pp. 91–163.Google Scholar
Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983) Situations and Attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bastin, E. W. (1953–4) ‘General Mathematical Problems involved in Mechanical Translation’. Mechanical Translation, vol. 3(1), p. 6.Google Scholar
Becker, J. (1975) ‘The Phrasal Lexicon’. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp. 54–8.CrossRef
Belnap, N. (1960) ‘Entailment and Relevance’. Journal of Symbolic Logic, pp. 176–179.Google Scholar
Birkhoff, G. (1940) Lattice Theory. American Mathematical Society Publication, 25, Providence, RI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. (1962) Models and Metaphors. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, R. B. (1953) Scientific Explanation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution (1958) Universal Decimal Classification. Trilingual Abridged Edition. British Standards Institution, London.
Brondal, V. (1950) Théorie des propositions. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L. E. J. (1952) ‘Historical Background, Principles and Methods of Intuitionism’. South African Journal of Science, vol. 49 pp. 139–46.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L. E. J.(1954) ‘Points and Spaces’. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 6, pp. 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, R. (1978) ‘Semantic Grammar: An Engineering Technique for Constructing Natural Language Understanding Systems’. Bolt, Beranek and Newman Technical Report 3453, Cambridge, MA.
Campbell, N. R. (1920) Physics, the Elements. Cambridge University Press. Later reprinted as Foundations of Science. Dover, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
Carbonell, J. G. (1982) ‘Metaphor: An Inescapable Phenomenon in Natural Language Comprehension’. Research Report CMU-CS-81-115, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon University; also in: Strategies for Natural Language Processing (Lehnert, W. G. and Ringle, M. H., Eds.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NY, pp. 415–33.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1937) The Logical Syntax of Language. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Chai, J. Y. and Biermann, A. W. (1997) ‘The Use of WordNet in Automatic Information Extraction’. In: Proceedings of the ACL workshop on Word Sense Disambiguation, Washington, DC, pp. 62–68.
Chao, Y.-R. (1946) ‘The Logical Structure of Chinese Words’. Presidential Address read at the regional meeting of the Linguistic Society of America in New York, December 31, 1945. In: Language, vol. 22, p. 4.
Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. Mouton, Dordrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.(1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Clarke, C. (1978) ‘Black Holes’. Theoria to Theory, vol. 12, pp. 275–9.Google Scholar
Copestake, A. and Briscoe, E. J. (1991) ‘Lexical Operations in a Unification-Based Framework’. In: Proceedings of ACL SIGLEX Workshop on Lexical Semantics and Knowledge Representation, Berkeley, CA, pp. 88–101.
Curry, H. B. (1953) ‘Mathematics, Syntax and Logic’. Mind, vol. 62, pp. 172–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1965) What is a Language?Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Dobson, J. (1965) ‘Report of an Experiment to Find Semantic Squares in an Interlingually-Coded Text Taken from a Traveller's Handbook’. CLRU Memo.
Dolby, J. L. (1966a) ‘On the Classification of Written English Phrases’. Memo to CLRU, January (unpublished).
Dolby, J. L. (1966b) ‘On the Complexity of Phrase Translations’. Memo to CLRU, January.
Dorr, B. and Jones, D. (1996) ‘Role of Word–Sense Disambiguation in Lexical Acquisition’. In: Proceedings of COLING ’96, Copenhagen, pp. 129–35.CrossRef
Duff, C. (1947) How to Learn a Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fass, D. C. (1988) ‘An Account of Coherence, Semantic Relations, Metonymy, and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution’. In: Lexical Ambiguity Resolution in the Comprehension of Human Language (Small, S. L., Cottrell, G. W. and Tannenhaus, M. K., Eds.) Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, pp. 151–78.Google Scholar
Feys, R. (1946) ‘La technique de la logique combinatoire’. Revue Philosophique de Louvain, vol. 18, p. 81.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968) ‘The Case for Case’. In: Universals in Linguistic Theory (Bach, E. and Harms, R., Eds.) Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 61–82.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1975) The Language of Thought. Thomas Crowell, New York.Google Scholar
‘Freeing the Mind’. Articles and Letters from The Times Literary Supplement, March–June 1962.
Frege, G. (1960) ‘On Sense and Reference’. In: Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (P. Geach, trans.) Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 56–78.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. A. (1959) Words and Things. Gollancz, London.Google Scholar
Givon, T. (1967) Transformations of Ellipsis, Sense Development and Rules of Lexical Derivation. SP-2896. Systems Development Corp., Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
Gsell, R. et al. (1963) ‘Etude et réalisation d’un détecteur de mélodie pour analyse de la parole’. L’Onde Electrique, vol. 43, pp. 90–101.Google Scholar
Guberina, P. (1954) Valeur logique et valeur stilistique des propositions complexes. Editions Epoha, Zagreb.Google Scholar
Guberina, P.(1957) ‘La logique de la logique et la logique du langage’. Studia Romanica, pp. 87–89.Google Scholar
Guberina, P.(1959) ‘Le son et le mouvement dans langage’. Studia Romanica, pp. 201–13.Google Scholar
Guo, C. (Ed.) (1992) Machine Tractable Dictionaries: Design and Construction. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
Haas, W. (1961) ‘Commentary on Masterman's Paper “Translation”’. In: Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 35, pp. 21–7.
Hacking, I. (1975) Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1956) ‘The Linguistic Basis of a Mechanical Thesaurus’. CLRU Memo. An abstract appeared in Machine Translation, vol. 3, p. 37.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1951) ‘Directions in Modern Linguistics’. Language, vol. 27 (Presidential Address to the Linguistic Society, Chicago, 1950), pp. 1–5.CrossRef
Hausser, R. (1999) Foundations of Computational Linguistics. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, M. B. (date unknown) Analogy and Structure in a Thesaurus. CLRU Workpaper, ML 101.
Hesse, M. B.(1959–60) ‘On Defining Analogy’. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, December, pp. 79–89.
Hesse, M. B.(1974) The Structure of Scientific Inference. Macmillan, London, and University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Isham, C. (1979) ‘Quantum Gravity’. Theoria to Theory, vol. 13, pp. 19–27.Google Scholar
International Business Machines (1958) Literature on Information Retrieval and Machine Translation, Bibliography and Index. IBM Research Centre, Yorktown Heights, New York.
International Business Machines(1959) ‘Final Report on Computer Set AN/GSQ-16 (XW-I)’, IBM Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, 6 volumes.
Jeans, J. H. (1921) The Dynamical Theory of Gases. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. E. (1921) Logic, Part 1. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, B. (1974) ‘Plate Tectonics: A Kuhnian Case?New Scientist, 63, pp. 536–8.Google Scholar
Joyce, T. and Needham, R. M. (1958) ‘The Thesaurus Approach to Information Retrieval’. American Documentation, 9(3), July, pp. 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. and Fodor, J. (1963) ‘The Structure of Semantic Theory’. Language, 39, pp. 170–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. J. (1972) Semantic Theory. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Kay, M. (no date) ‘The Relevance of Linguistics to Machine Translation’. Unpublished Manuscript.
Kay, M. and McKinnon-Wood, R. (1960) ‘A Flexible Punched-Card Procedure for Word Decomposition’. CLRU memo ML-119.
Keynes, J. M. (1921) Treatise on Probability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Langford, C. H. (1942) ‘The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy’. In: The Philosophy of G. E. Moore (Schilpp, P. A., Ed.) 3rd edn, Open Court, La Salle, IL, pp. 210–25.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1972) ‘General Semantics’. In: Semantics of Natural Language (Davidson, D. and Harman, G., Eds.) Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1690) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, W. N. and Booth, A. D. (Eds.) (1955) Machine Translation of Languages. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Luhn, H. P. (1956) ‘A Statistical Approach to Mechanised Literature Searching’. IBM Journal of Research. Reprinted in Advances in Automatic Text Summarization (I. Mani and M. Maybury, Eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, J. (1951) Aristotle's Syllogistic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mellish, C. (1988) ‘Implementing Systemic Classification by Unification’. Computational Linguistics, vol. 14(1), pp. 40–51.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (date unknown) ‘Extension and Testing of CLRU Library System’. CLRU memorandum.
Miller, G. et al. (1990) ‘Five Papers on WordNet’. Research Memorandum 43, Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton, NJ.
Mooers, C. N. (1956) The Next Twenty Years in Information Retrieval. Zator Company, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Moore, G. F. (1922) Philosophical Studies. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Nagao, M. (1989) Machine Translation: How Far Can it Go? Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Needham, R. M. (1958) ‘Research Note on a Property of Finite Lattices’. CLRU memorandum.
Needham, R. M.(1959) ‘The Problem of Chunking’. CLRU memo ML-75.
Needham, R. M.(1961) ‘Classes and Concepts’. Paper read at the fourth Conference of the British Society for the Philosophy of Science.
Newman, S. M. (1959) Analysis of Prepositionals for Interrelational Concepts. Preliminary study. US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. D. and Arnold, G. F. (1961) Intonation of Spoken English. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Olney, J. L. (1964) ‘An Investigation of English Discourse Structure with Particular Attention to Anaphoric Relationships’. Memo, Systems Development Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Parker-Rhodes, A. F. (1956) ‘An Algebraic Thesaurus’. CLRU memo. An abstract in Machine Translation, vol. 3, p. 36.
Parker-Rhodes, A. F.(date unknown) ‘The Lattice Method for the Mechanical Processing of Syntax’. CLRU Workpaper, ML-116.
Parker-Rhodes, A. F., Needham, R. M. (1959) Reduction Method for Non-Arithmetic Data. IFIP, Paris, pp. 1125–30.Google Scholar
Parker-Rhodes, A. F., Needham, R. M.(1962) ‘Computational Methods in Lattice Theory’. Cambridge Philosophical Society Transactions, pp. 83–92.Google Scholar
Parker-Rhodes, A. F. and Wordley, C. (1959) ‘Mechanical Translation by the Thesaurus Method Using Existing Machinery’. Journal of the SMPTE, vol. 68, pp. 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker-Rhodes, A. F., McKinnon Wood, R., Kay, M. and Bratley, P. (date unknown) The Cambridge Language Research Unit Computer Program for Syntactic Analysis. CLRU Monograph, ML-136.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–58) Collected Papers. (Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P., Eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Price, P. J., Ostendorf, M. and Wightman, C. W. (1989) ‘Prosody and Parsing’. In: Proceedings of Speech and Natural Language Workshop, DARPA, October, pp. 5–11.CrossRef
Pustejovsky, J. (1995) The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1953) From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Reifler, E. (1954) ‘The First Conference on Mechanical Translation’. Mechanical Translation, vol. 1(2), pp. 23–32.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1936) Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. and Gibson, C. M. (1956) English through Pictures. Repr. Pocket Books, New York (1952). Originally published as The Pocket Book of Basic English, New York, 1945.Google Scholar
Richens, R. H. (1956) ‘A General Program for Machine Translation between Any Two Languages via an Algebraic Interlingua’. CLRU memo ML-5. Abstract appeared in Machine Translation, vol. 3, p. 37.
Richens, R. H.(1957) ‘The Thirteen Steps’. CLRU workpaper, July.
Richens, R. H.(1958) ‘Interlingual Mechanical Translation’. The Computer Journal, vol. 1, pp. 144–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richens, R. H.(1959) ‘Tigris and Euphrates’. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Mechanisation of Thought Process, National Physical Laboratory, HMSO, London, pp. 312–23.
Roget, P. M. (1931, 1962) Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Rosten, L. (1934) The Education of Hyman Kaplan. Gollancz, London.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1930) The Principles of Mathematics. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1953) ‘The Cult of “Common Usage”’. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, pp. 303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1975) Conceptual Information Processing, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Sejnowski, T. and Rosenberg, C. (1986) ‘NETtalk: A Parallel Network that Learns to Read Aloud’. Johns Hopkins University Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Technical Report, JHU/EEC-86/01.
Shaw, M. (1958) ‘Compacting Roget's Thesaurus’. CLRU memo.
Shillan, D. (1954) Spoken English. Longmans, London, 2nd edn, 1965.Google Scholar
Shillan, D.(1965a) ‘A Linguistic Unit Adaptable to Economical Concordance-Making’. CLRU memo.
Shillan, D.(1965b) ‘A Method and a Reason for Tune-Analysis of Language’. CLRU memo.
Shillan, D.(1965c) ‘Anomalous Finites’. CLRU memo.
Spärck Jones, K. (1963) ‘A Note on NUDE’. CLRU memo ML-164.
Spärck Jones, K. (1964) ‘Synonymy and Semantic Classification’. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge (and Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 1986).Google Scholar
Stetson, R. (1951) Motor Phonetics, North-Holland Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Strzalkowski, T. (1992) ‘Information Retrieval Using Robust Natural Language Processing’. In: Proceedings of Speech and Natural Language Workshop, DARPA, February, pp. 206–11.
Tanimoto, H. (1937) An Elementary Mathematical Theory of Classification and Prediction. IBM Corp., New York.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (1982) ‘Programs, Theories and Models in Cognitive Science’. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 155–7.Google Scholar
Thorne, R. G. (1955) ‘The Efficiency of Subject Catalogues and the Cost of Information Searches’. Journal of Documentation, 11, pp. 130–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waismann, F. (1945) ‘Verifiability’. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary vol. 19.
Weinreich, U. (1966) ‘Explorations in Semantic Theory’. In: Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 3, (Sebeok, T., Ed.), Mouton, The Hague, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar
Whitehall, H. (1951) The Structural Essentials of English. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1950) Four Articles on Metalinguistics. Foreign Service Institute, Department of State, Washington DC (repr. from The Technology Review and Language, Culture and Personality).
Wilkins, J. (1668) An Essay Towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language. London.Google Scholar
Wilks, Y. (1964) ‘Text Searching with Templates’. In: Masterman, M., ‘A Picture of Language’ CLRU memo.
Wilks, Y.(1965a) ‘Final Report AF 61-(052) 647’. CLRU memo ML-171.
Wilks, Y.(1965b) ‘Application of the CLRU. Method of Semantic Analysis to Information Retrieval’. CLRU memo ML-173.
Wilks, Y.(1965c) ‘Computable Semantic Derivation’. CLRU memo.
Wilks, Y.(1975a) ‘Preference Semantics’. In: The Formal Semantics of Natural Language (Keenan, E., Ed.) Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Y.(1975b) ‘A Preferential Pattern-Seeking Semantics for Natural Language’. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 6, pp. 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Y.(1978) ‘Making Preferences More Active’. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 11, pp. 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Y., Slator, B. and Guthrie, L. (1996) Electric Words. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wisdom, J. (1942) ‘Moore's Technique’. In: The Philosophy of G. E. Moore (Schilpp, P. A., Ed.) 3rd edn, Open Court, La Salle, IL, pp. 421–50.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1922) Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.(1958, 1972) Philosophical Investigations (trans. G. E. M. Anscombe), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Yarowsky, D. (1992) ‘Word-Sense Disambiguation Using Statistical Models of Roget's Categories Trained on Large Corpora’. In: Proceedings of COLING ’92, Nantes, France, pp. 317–24.
Zipf, G. K. (1953) The Psychobiology of Language. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, D. (1965) Studies in Phonetics and Linguistics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, W. S. (1957) On the Linguistic Study of Languages. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, R. and Greenough, L. (Eds.) (1888) Caesar's Gallic War. London.Google Scholar
Amsler, R. A. (1980) ‘The Structure of the Merriam-Webster Pocket Dictionary’. PhD dissertation, Technical Report TR-164, University of Texas at Austin.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1959) An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1956–7) ‘A Plea for Excuses, Presidential Address’. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 56 pp. 12–20.
Baird, A. (1966) ‘Transformation and Sequence in Pronunciation Teaching’. English Language Teaching, vol. 20, pp. 71–9.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1953) ‘The Present State of Research on Mechanical Translation’. American Documentation, 2, pp. 229–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Y.(1960) ‘The Present Status of Automatic Translation of Languages’. In: Advances in Computers (Alt, F. L., Ed.) Academic Press, New York, vol. 1, pp. 91–163.Google Scholar
Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983) Situations and Attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bastin, E. W. (1953–4) ‘General Mathematical Problems involved in Mechanical Translation’. Mechanical Translation, vol. 3(1), p. 6.Google Scholar
Becker, J. (1975) ‘The Phrasal Lexicon’. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, MIT, Cambridge, MA, pp. 54–8.CrossRef
Belnap, N. (1960) ‘Entailment and Relevance’. Journal of Symbolic Logic, pp. 176–179.Google Scholar
Birkhoff, G. (1940) Lattice Theory. American Mathematical Society Publication, 25, Providence, RI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, M. (1962) Models and Metaphors. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, R. B. (1953) Scientific Explanation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
British Standards Institution (1958) Universal Decimal Classification. Trilingual Abridged Edition. British Standards Institution, London.
Brondal, V. (1950) Théorie des propositions. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L. E. J. (1952) ‘Historical Background, Principles and Methods of Intuitionism’. South African Journal of Science, vol. 49 pp. 139–46.Google Scholar
Brouwer, L. E. J.(1954) ‘Points and Spaces’. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 6, pp. 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, R. (1978) ‘Semantic Grammar: An Engineering Technique for Constructing Natural Language Understanding Systems’. Bolt, Beranek and Newman Technical Report 3453, Cambridge, MA.
Campbell, N. R. (1920) Physics, the Elements. Cambridge University Press. Later reprinted as Foundations of Science. Dover, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
Carbonell, J. G. (1982) ‘Metaphor: An Inescapable Phenomenon in Natural Language Comprehension’. Research Report CMU-CS-81-115, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon University; also in: Strategies for Natural Language Processing (Lehnert, W. G. and Ringle, M. H., Eds.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NY, pp. 415–33.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1937) The Logical Syntax of Language. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Chai, J. Y. and Biermann, A. W. (1997) ‘The Use of WordNet in Automatic Information Extraction’. In: Proceedings of the ACL workshop on Word Sense Disambiguation, Washington, DC, pp. 62–68.
Chao, Y.-R. (1946) ‘The Logical Structure of Chinese Words’. Presidential Address read at the regional meeting of the Linguistic Society of America in New York, December 31, 1945. In: Language, vol. 22, p. 4.
Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. Mouton, Dordrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.(1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Clarke, C. (1978) ‘Black Holes’. Theoria to Theory, vol. 12, pp. 275–9.Google Scholar
Copestake, A. and Briscoe, E. J. (1991) ‘Lexical Operations in a Unification-Based Framework’. In: Proceedings of ACL SIGLEX Workshop on Lexical Semantics and Knowledge Representation, Berkeley, CA, pp. 88–101.
Curry, H. B. (1953) ‘Mathematics, Syntax and Logic’. Mind, vol. 62, pp. 172–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1965) What is a Language?Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Dobson, J. (1965) ‘Report of an Experiment to Find Semantic Squares in an Interlingually-Coded Text Taken from a Traveller's Handbook’. CLRU Memo.
Dolby, J. L. (1966a) ‘On the Classification of Written English Phrases’. Memo to CLRU, January (unpublished).
Dolby, J. L. (1966b) ‘On the Complexity of Phrase Translations’. Memo to CLRU, January.
Dorr, B. and Jones, D. (1996) ‘Role of Word–Sense Disambiguation in Lexical Acquisition’. In: Proceedings of COLING ’96, Copenhagen, pp. 129–35.CrossRef
Duff, C. (1947) How to Learn a Language. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fass, D. C. (1988) ‘An Account of Coherence, Semantic Relations, Metonymy, and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution’. In: Lexical Ambiguity Resolution in the Comprehension of Human Language (Small, S. L., Cottrell, G. W. and Tannenhaus, M. K., Eds.) Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, pp. 151–78.Google Scholar
Feys, R. (1946) ‘La technique de la logique combinatoire’. Revue Philosophique de Louvain, vol. 18, p. 81.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968) ‘The Case for Case’. In: Universals in Linguistic Theory (Bach, E. and Harms, R., Eds.) Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 61–82.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1975) The Language of Thought. Thomas Crowell, New York.Google Scholar
‘Freeing the Mind’. Articles and Letters from The Times Literary Supplement, March–June 1962.
Frege, G. (1960) ‘On Sense and Reference’. In: Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (P. Geach, trans.) Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 56–78.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. A. (1959) Words and Things. Gollancz, London.Google Scholar
Givon, T. (1967) Transformations of Ellipsis, Sense Development and Rules of Lexical Derivation. SP-2896. Systems Development Corp., Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
Gsell, R. et al. (1963) ‘Etude et réalisation d’un détecteur de mélodie pour analyse de la parole’. L’Onde Electrique, vol. 43, pp. 90–101.Google Scholar
Guberina, P. (1954) Valeur logique et valeur stilistique des propositions complexes. Editions Epoha, Zagreb.Google Scholar
Guberina, P.(1957) ‘La logique de la logique et la logique du langage’. Studia Romanica, pp. 87–89.Google Scholar
Guberina, P.(1959) ‘Le son et le mouvement dans langage’. Studia Romanica, pp. 201–13.Google Scholar
Guo, C. (Ed.) (1992) Machine Tractable Dictionaries: Design and Construction. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.Google Scholar
Haas, W. (1961) ‘Commentary on Masterman's Paper “Translation”’. In: Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 35, pp. 21–7.
Hacking, I. (1975) Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy? Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1956) ‘The Linguistic Basis of a Mechanical Thesaurus’. CLRU Memo. An abstract appeared in Machine Translation, vol. 3, p. 37.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1951) ‘Directions in Modern Linguistics’. Language, vol. 27 (Presidential Address to the Linguistic Society, Chicago, 1950), pp. 1–5.CrossRef
Hausser, R. (1999) Foundations of Computational Linguistics. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, M. B. (date unknown) Analogy and Structure in a Thesaurus. CLRU Workpaper, ML 101.
Hesse, M. B.(1959–60) ‘On Defining Analogy’. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, December, pp. 79–89.
Hesse, M. B.(1974) The Structure of Scientific Inference. Macmillan, London, and University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Isham, C. (1979) ‘Quantum Gravity’. Theoria to Theory, vol. 13, pp. 19–27.Google Scholar
International Business Machines (1958) Literature on Information Retrieval and Machine Translation, Bibliography and Index. IBM Research Centre, Yorktown Heights, New York.
International Business Machines(1959) ‘Final Report on Computer Set AN/GSQ-16 (XW-I)’, IBM Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, 6 volumes.
Jeans, J. H. (1921) The Dynamical Theory of Gases. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. E. (1921) Logic, Part 1. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, B. (1974) ‘Plate Tectonics: A Kuhnian Case?New Scientist, 63, pp. 536–8.Google Scholar
Joyce, T. and Needham, R. M. (1958) ‘The Thesaurus Approach to Information Retrieval’. American Documentation, 9(3), July, pp. 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. and Fodor, J. (1963) ‘The Structure of Semantic Theory’. Language, 39, pp. 170–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. J. (1972) Semantic Theory. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Kay, M. (no date) ‘The Relevance of Linguistics to Machine Translation’. Unpublished Manuscript.
Kay, M. and McKinnon-Wood, R. (1960) ‘A Flexible Punched-Card Procedure for Word Decomposition’. CLRU memo ML-119.
Keynes, J. M. (1921) Treatise on Probability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Langford, C. H. (1942) ‘The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy’. In: The Philosophy of G. E. Moore (Schilpp, P. A., Ed.) 3rd edn, Open Court, La Salle, IL, pp. 210–25.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1972) ‘General Semantics’. In: Semantics of Natural Language (Davidson, D. and Harman, G., Eds.) Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1690) An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, W. N. and Booth, A. D. (Eds.) (1955) Machine Translation of Languages. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Luhn, H. P. (1956) ‘A Statistical Approach to Mechanised Literature Searching’. IBM Journal of Research. Reprinted in Advances in Automatic Text Summarization (I. Mani and M. Maybury, Eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar
Lukasiewicz, J. (1951) Aristotle's Syllogistic. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mellish, C. (1988) ‘Implementing Systemic Classification by Unification’. Computational Linguistics, vol. 14(1), pp. 40–51.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (date unknown) ‘Extension and Testing of CLRU Library System’. CLRU memorandum.
Miller, G. et al. (1990) ‘Five Papers on WordNet’. Research Memorandum 43, Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton, NJ.
Mooers, C. N. (1956) The Next Twenty Years in Information Retrieval. Zator Company, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Moore, G. F. (1922) Philosophical Studies. Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
Nagao, M. (1989) Machine Translation: How Far Can it Go? Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Needham, R. M. (1958) ‘Research Note on a Property of Finite Lattices’. CLRU memorandum.
Needham, R. M.(1959) ‘The Problem of Chunking’. CLRU memo ML-75.
Needham, R. M.(1961) ‘Classes and Concepts’. Paper read at the fourth Conference of the British Society for the Philosophy of Science.
Newman, S. M. (1959) Analysis of Prepositionals for Interrelational Concepts. Preliminary study. US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. D. and Arnold, G. F. (1961) Intonation of Spoken English. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Olney, J. L. (1964) ‘An Investigation of English Discourse Structure with Particular Attention to Anaphoric Relationships’. Memo, Systems Development Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
Parker-Rhodes, A. F. (1956) ‘An Algebraic Thesaurus’. CLRU memo. An abstract in Machine Translation, vol. 3, p. 36.
Parker-Rhodes, A. F.(date unknown) ‘The Lattice Method for the Mechanical Processing of Syntax’. CLRU Workpaper, ML-116.
Parker-Rhodes, A. F., Needham, R. M. (1959) Reduction Method for Non-Arithmetic Data. IFIP, Paris, pp. 1125–30.Google Scholar
Parker-Rhodes, A. F., Needham, R. M.(1962) ‘Computational Methods in Lattice Theory’. Cambridge Philosophical Society Transactions, pp. 83–92.Google Scholar
Parker-Rhodes, A. F. and Wordley, C. (1959) ‘Mechanical Translation by the Thesaurus Method Using Existing Machinery’. Journal of the SMPTE, vol. 68, pp. 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker-Rhodes, A. F., McKinnon Wood, R., Kay, M. and Bratley, P. (date unknown) The Cambridge Language Research Unit Computer Program for Syntactic Analysis. CLRU Monograph, ML-136.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–58) Collected Papers. (Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P., Eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, vol. 2.Google Scholar
Price, P. J., Ostendorf, M. and Wightman, C. W. (1989) ‘Prosody and Parsing’. In: Proceedings of Speech and Natural Language Workshop, DARPA, October, pp. 5–11.CrossRef
Pustejovsky, J. (1995) The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1953) From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Reifler, E. (1954) ‘The First Conference on Mechanical Translation’. Mechanical Translation, vol. 1(2), pp. 23–32.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. (1936) Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, I. A. and Gibson, C. M. (1956) English through Pictures. Repr. Pocket Books, New York (1952). Originally published as The Pocket Book of Basic English, New York, 1945.Google Scholar
Richens, R. H. (1956) ‘A General Program for Machine Translation between Any Two Languages via an Algebraic Interlingua’. CLRU memo ML-5. Abstract appeared in Machine Translation, vol. 3, p. 37.
Richens, R. H.(1957) ‘The Thirteen Steps’. CLRU workpaper, July.
Richens, R. H.(1958) ‘Interlingual Mechanical Translation’. The Computer Journal, vol. 1, pp. 144–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richens, R. H.(1959) ‘Tigris and Euphrates’. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Mechanisation of Thought Process, National Physical Laboratory, HMSO, London, pp. 312–23.
Roget, P. M. (1931, 1962) Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases. Longmans, London.Google Scholar
Rosten, L. (1934) The Education of Hyman Kaplan. Gollancz, London.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1930) The Principles of Mathematics. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1953) ‘The Cult of “Common Usage”’. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 3, pp. 303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C. (1975) Conceptual Information Processing, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Sejnowski, T. and Rosenberg, C. (1986) ‘NETtalk: A Parallel Network that Learns to Read Aloud’. Johns Hopkins University Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Technical Report, JHU/EEC-86/01.
Shaw, M. (1958) ‘Compacting Roget's Thesaurus’. CLRU memo.
Shillan, D. (1954) Spoken English. Longmans, London, 2nd edn, 1965.Google Scholar
Shillan, D.(1965a) ‘A Linguistic Unit Adaptable to Economical Concordance-Making’. CLRU memo.
Shillan, D.(1965b) ‘A Method and a Reason for Tune-Analysis of Language’. CLRU memo.
Shillan, D.(1965c) ‘Anomalous Finites’. CLRU memo.
Spärck Jones, K. (1963) ‘A Note on NUDE’. CLRU memo ML-164.
Spärck Jones, K. (1964) ‘Synonymy and Semantic Classification’. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge (and Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 1986).Google Scholar
Stetson, R. (1951) Motor Phonetics, North-Holland Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Strzalkowski, T. (1992) ‘Information Retrieval Using Robust Natural Language Processing’. In: Proceedings of Speech and Natural Language Workshop, DARPA, February, pp. 206–11.
Tanimoto, H. (1937) An Elementary Mathematical Theory of Classification and Prediction. IBM Corp., New York.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (1982) ‘Programs, Theories and Models in Cognitive Science’. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 155–7.Google Scholar
Thorne, R. G. (1955) ‘The Efficiency of Subject Catalogues and the Cost of Information Searches’. Journal of Documentation, 11, pp. 130–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waismann, F. (1945) ‘Verifiability’. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary vol. 19.
Weinreich, U. (1966) ‘Explorations in Semantic Theory’. In: Current Trends in Linguistics, vol. 3, (Sebeok, T., Ed.), Mouton, The Hague, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar
Whitehall, H. (1951) The Structural Essentials of English. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1950) Four Articles on Metalinguistics. Foreign Service Institute, Department of State, Washington DC (repr. from The Technology Review and Language, Culture and Personality).
Wilkins, J. (1668) An Essay Towards a Real Character and a Philosophical Language. London.Google Scholar
Wilks, Y. (1964) ‘Text Searching with Templates’. In: Masterman, M., ‘A Picture of Language’ CLRU memo.
Wilks, Y.(1965a) ‘Final Report AF 61-(052) 647’. CLRU memo ML-171.
Wilks, Y.(1965b) ‘Application of the CLRU. Method of Semantic Analysis to Information Retrieval’. CLRU memo ML-173.
Wilks, Y.(1965c) ‘Computable Semantic Derivation’. CLRU memo.
Wilks, Y.(1975a) ‘Preference Semantics’. In: The Formal Semantics of Natural Language (Keenan, E., Ed.) Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Y.(1975b) ‘A Preferential Pattern-Seeking Semantics for Natural Language’. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 6, pp. 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Y.(1978) ‘Making Preferences More Active’. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 11, pp. 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Y., Slator, B. and Guthrie, L. (1996) Electric Words. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wisdom, J. (1942) ‘Moore's Technique’. In: The Philosophy of G. E. Moore (Schilpp, P. A., Ed.) 3rd edn, Open Court, La Salle, IL, pp. 421–50.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1922) Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.(1958, 1972) Philosophical Investigations (trans. G. E. M. Anscombe), Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Yarowsky, D. (1992) ‘Word-Sense Disambiguation Using Statistical Models of Roget's Categories Trained on Large Corpora’. In: Proceedings of COLING ’92, Nantes, France, pp. 317–24.
Zipf, G. K. (1953) The Psychobiology of Language. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×