References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2012
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Empirical Social ChoiceQuestionnaire-Experimental Studies on Distributive Justice, pp. 201 - 209Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
2004 Exploring social welfare functions and violation of monotonicity: an example from inequalities in healthJournal of Health Economics 23 313CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2008 Understanding preference for egalitarian policies in health: are age and sex determinantsApplied Economics 40 2451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1965 Inequity in social exchangeAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology267New YorkAcademic PressGoogle Scholar
1978 Who should get what? Fairness judgments of the distribution of earningsAmerican Journal of Sociology 84 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1994 Income inequality and social welfareTaxation, Poverty and Income Distribution193AldershotEdward ElgarGoogle Scholar
1998 Distributional orderings and the transfer principle: a re-examinationResearch on Economic Inequality 8 195Google Scholar
2008
2009 To be or not to be involved: a questionnaire–experimental view on Harsanyi’s utilitarian ethicsSocial Choice and Welfare 32 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000 Utilities vs rights to publicly provided goods: arguments and evidence from health-care rationingEconomica 67 543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999 Preferences for equity in health behind a veil of ignoranceHealth Economics 8 3693.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1985 Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the TalmudJournal of Economic Theory 36 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1993 Judgments of distributive justicePsychological Perspectives on Justice55CambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002 Envy, malice and Pareto efficiency: an experimental examinationSocial Choice and Welfare 19 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992 Interdisciplinary theory and research on justiceJustice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives237CambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
2002 How should income be divided? Questionnaire evidence from the theory of impartial preferencesJournal of Economics 9 163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005 A nonparametric elicitation of the equity-efficiency trade-off in cost-utility analysisJournal of Health Economics 24 655CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2007
2004 Social welfare, the veil of ignorance and purely individual risk: an empirical examinationResearch on Economic Inequality 11 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009 Equality preference in the claims problem: a questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensionsSocial Choice and Welfare 33 533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011 The importance of moral reflection and self-reported data in a dictator game with productionSocial Choice and Welfare 36 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990 Equality of what? On welfare, goods and capabilitiesRecherches Économiques de Louvain 56 357Google Scholar
2001 Equity considerations in health care: the relevance of claimsHealth Economics 10 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1977 Equity and the informational basis of collective choiceReview of Economic Studies 44 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1983 Current social psychological perspectives on justiceEuropean Journal of Social Psychology 13 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998 The measurement of individual utility and social welfareJournal of Health Economics 17 39CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2007 It ain’t what you do, it’s the way that you do it: characteristics of procedural justice and their importance in social decision-makingJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization 64 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003 An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in healthHealth Economics 12 545CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2005 QALY maximisation and people’s preferences: a methodological review of the literatureHealth Economics 14 197CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2005 Health priorities and public preferences: the relative importance of past health experience and future health prospectsJournal of Health Economics 24 703CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2009 The social welfare function and individual responsibility: some theoretical issues and empirical evidenceJournal of Health Economics 28 210CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1981 What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfarePhilosophy and Public Affairs 10 185Google Scholar
1981 What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resourcesPhilosophy and Public Affairs 10 283Google Scholar
2009 Taking empirical studies seriously: the principle of concentration and the measurement of welfare and inequalitySocial Choice and Welfare 32 555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007 How context matters: a survey based experiment on distributive justiceJournal of Public Economics 91 1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000 Cooperation and punishment in public goods experimentsAmerican Economic Review 90 980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995 Three solutions for the compensation problemJournal of Economic Theory 65 505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003 On the informational basis of social choiceSocial Choice and Welfare 21 347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005 The news of the death of welfare economics is greatly exaggeratedSocial Choice and Welfare 25 381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009 Unfair inequalities in health and health careJournal of Health Economics 28 73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2001 Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistributionJournal of Public Economics 82 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987 Choices of principles of distributive justice in experimental groupsAmerican Journal of Political Science 31 606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005 Moral property rights in bargaining with infeasible claimsManagement Science 51 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006 Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims: normative judgments and actual negotiationsSocial Choice and Welfare 27 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992 Distributive judgmentsSocial Choice and Bargaining Perspectives on Distributive Justice93AmsterdamNorth-HollandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008 Individual rights versus economic growthJournal of Human Development 9 389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002 Evaluation via extended orderings: empirical findings from Western and Eastern EuropeSocial Choice and Welfare 19 29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001 Cross-cultural equity evaluations: a questionnaire–experimental approachEuropean Economic Review 45 953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009 Individual choices in a non-consequentialist framework: a procedural approachArguments for a Better World. Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen148New YorkOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
2006 Positive versus negative framing affects justice judgmentsSocial Justice Research 19 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010 Attribute framing affects the perceived fairness of health care allocation principlesJudgment and Decision Making 5 11Google Scholar
2010 What ethics can learn from experimental economics – if anythingEuropean Journal of Political Economy 26 302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1976 Equity, Arrow’s conditions and Rawls’s difference principleEconometrica 44 793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1953 Cardinal utility in welfare economics and the theory of risk-takingJournal of Political Economy 61 434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1955 Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utilityJournal of Political Economy 63 309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1977 Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social SituationsCambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2000
2004 The role of information in choices over income distributionsJournal of Conflict Resolution 48 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010 On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental studySocial Choice and Welfare 34 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001 The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problemsMathematical Social Sciences 42 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011 Judgements regarding the fair division of goods: the impact of verbal versus quantitative descriptions of alternative divisionsSocial Choice and Welfare 37 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1996 A note on the estimation of the equity–efficiency trade-off for QALY’sJournal of Health Economics 15 359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002 Measuring future grandparents’ preferences for equality and relative standingEconomic Journal 112 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2011 State dependence in sequential equity judgementsSocial Choice and Welfare 37 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986 Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: entitlements in the marketAmerican Economic Review 76 728Google Scholar
1992 Distributive results in bargaining experimentsSocial Choice and Bargaining Perspectives on Distributive JusticeHeidelberg, Berlin and New YorkSpringer VerlagGoogle Scholar
1996 A positive theory of economic fairnessJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001 Fair and square: the four sides of distributive justiceJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003 Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theoriesJournal of Economic Literature 41 1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2009
2009 Is fairness in the eye of the beholder? An impartial spectator analysis of justiceSocial Choice and Welfare 33 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997 Health maximization rejected: the view of Swedish politiciansEuropean Journal of Public Health 7 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998 On the measurement of the nation’s equity adjusted healthHealth Economics 7 6213.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1978 Who accepts the Pareto axiom? The role of utility and equity in arbitration decisionsBehavioral Science 23 446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999 How should what economists call “social values” be measuredJournal of Ethics 3 249Google Scholar
1994 Review of Scherer, K. (ed.), Justice: interdisciplinary perspectivesSocial Justice Research 7 167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001 The impartial observer theorem of social ethicsEconomics and Philosophy 17 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987 Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methodsInternational Journal of Game Theory 16 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002 Axiomatic cost and surplus-sharingHandbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 1289AmsterdamNorth-HollandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1995 The person-trade-off approach to valuing health care programsMedical Decision Making 15 201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2000 Women and Human Development: The Capabilities ApproachCambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2006 Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species MembershipCambridge, MAHarvard University PressGoogle Scholar
2000 A note on eliciting distributive preferences for healthJournal of Health Economics 19 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005 Measuring the health of populations: the veil of ignorance approachHealth Economics 14 69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1980 Possibility theorems with interpersonally comparable welfare levelsReview of Economic Studies 47 409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2002 Measuring the social importance of concentration or dispersion of individual health benefitsHealth Economics 11 43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1993 A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian plannerPhilosophy and Public Affairs 22 146Google Scholar
1999 Experience from a course in game theory: pre- and post-class problems sets as a didactic deviceGames and Economic Behavior 28 155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1982 Contractualism and utilitarianismUtilitarianism and Beyond103CambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Subjective probability and expected utility without additivityEconometrica 57 571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991 Interindividual differences in opinions about distributive justiceKyklos 44 325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003 Responsibility-sensitive fair compensation in different culturesSocial Choice and Welfare 21 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989 Moral intuitions and economic models of distributive justiceSocial Choice and Welfare 6 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2008
1979 Personal utilities and public judgements: or what’s wrong with welfare economicsEconomic Journal 89 537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001 Characterizations of consequentialism and non-consequentialismJournal of Economic Theory 101 423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999 Public opinion and political philosophy: the relation between social-scientific and philosophical analyses of distributive justiceEthical Theory and Moral Practice 2 337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2001 On the axiomatic method and its recent applications to game theory and resource allocationSocial Choice and Welfare 18 327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003 Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a surveyMathematical Social Sciences 45 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992 The social psychology of distributive justiceJustice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives177CambridgeCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
2009 An experimental study on individual choice, social welfare, and social preferencesEuropean Economic Review 53 385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2005 Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding – or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justiceSocial Choice and Welfare 24 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2007 Do NHS clinicians and members of the public share the same views about reducing inequalities in healthSocial Science and Medicine 64 2499CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2009 Equality of what in health? Distinguishing between outcome egalitarianism and gain egalitarianismHealth Economics 18 147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2003 Measuring people’s preferences regarding ageism in health: some methodological issues and some fresh evidenceSocial Science and Medicine 57 687CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1999 How stable are people’s preferences for giving priority to severely ill patientsSocial Science and Medicine 49 895CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1999 Social responsibility, personal responsibility, and prognosis in public judgments about transplant allocationBioethics 13 57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2005 The nature of procedural preferences for rational health care decisionsSocial Science and Medicine 60 223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1973 New directions in equity researchJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 25 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991 A reconsideration of the Harsanyi–Sen debate on utilitarianismInterpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being255CambridgeCambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997 Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the “ fair innings” argumentHealth Economics 6 1173.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar