Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Empirical Social Choice
  • Cited by 19
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
January 2012
Print publication year:
2011
Online ISBN:
9781139012867
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012867
Subjects:
Economics, Political Theory, Microeconomics, Politics and International Relations
Information

Book description

Since Aristotle, many different theories of distributive justice have been proposed, by philosophers as well as social scientists. The typical approach within social choice theory is to assess these theories in an axiomatic way – most of the time the reader is confronted with abstract reasoning and logical deductions. This book shows that empirical insights are necessary if one wants to apply any theory of justice in the real world. It does so by confronting the main theories of distributive justice with data from (mostly) questionnaire experiments. The book starts with an extensive discussion on why empirical social choice makes sense and how it should be done. It then presents various experimental results relating to theories of distributive justice, including the Rawlsian equity axiom, Harsanyi's version of utilitarianism, utilitarianism with a floor, responsibility-sensitive egalitarianism, the claims problem and fairness in health.

Reviews

‘In covering a range of 'traditional' questions, the concept of fairness, ideas about fairness in health as well as issues of rationale and methodology, Gaertner and Schokkaert are to be congratulated on producing this timely companion. It is ideal for economists and psychologists setting out to do experimental studies, as well as philosophers interested in understanding how ordinary people think about a range of distributive and procedural fairness issues. An excellent overview of an emerging field the authors have done much to create.’

Paul Anand - Open University, and Research Associate at HERC, Oxford University

‘Empirical social choice lies at the interface between philosophy and economics and is central to the investigation of difficult normative issues. It is an important way of testing out whether approaches to value-laden issues in economics are appropriate, whether there is evidence to support elegant and theoretically attractive theories. Wulf Gaertner and Erik Schokkaert are acknowledged experts in the field and their book is an invaluable contribution to understanding this subject.’

Frank Cowell - Director of the Public Economics Programme (STICERD), London School of Economics and Political Science

‘On what grounds can we say that an egalitarian society is better than an inegalitarian one in which all individuals would be better off? When is an income distribution more just than another one? More generally, what is social justice? Preeminent economists such as Serge-Christophe Kolm or Amartya Sen and philosophers such as John Rawls have tried to give theoretical responses to these questions. But what about you, your relatives, your neighbours, the man in the street? In this remarkable and pioneering book, using the techniques developed within experimental economics, Wulf Gaetrner and Erik Schokkaert describe how the concepts pervading the theory of justice are perceived by 'ordinary' human beings. There is no doubt that this should have important consequences on the future development of these theoretical concepts and on public policy.’

Maurice Salles - University of Caen

‘Empirical Social Choice is a must-read for anyone interested in the relationship between philosophical ethics and empirical research on moral preferences. It is clearly and accessibly written, and its audience should include not only social choice theorists but also philosophers, behavioral economists, political scientists and social psychologists. Among other things, this volume includes evidence on the roles of efficiency, responsibility and need and considers applications to income, health and economic wealth, but the findings described also relate to, and sometimes even predate, important developments in experimental philosophy and behavioral economics. The authors, who are themselves among the foremost contributors to this literature, not only elucidate but also convincingly advocate for this research program.’

James Konow - Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles

'The book is well-written and accessible, making it suitable for a large number of readers. Graduate students will find the book an ideal starting point for theses on the subject, and parts of the book may be used to introduce undergraduate students to the subtleties of normative theories since they will be stimulated by how people like themselves perceive the concepts.'

Source: Social Choice and Welfare

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
References
Abásolo, I.Tsuchiya, A. 2004 Exploring social welfare functions and violation of monotonicity: an example from inequalities in healthJournal of Health Economics 23 313
Abásolo, I.Tsuchiya, A. 2008 Understanding preference for egalitarian policies in health: are age and sex determinantsApplied Economics 40 2451
Adams, J. S. 1965 Inequity in social exchangeAdvances in Experimental Social PsychologyBerkowitz, L.267New YorkAcademic Press
Alesina, A.Angeletos, G.-M. 2005 Fairness and redistributionAmerican Economic Review 95 960
Alesina, A.Giuliano, P. 2011 Preferences for redistributionHandbook of Social EconomicsAmsterdamNorth-Holland
Alves, W.Rossi, P. 1978 Who should get what? Fairness judgments of the distribution of earningsAmerican Journal of Sociology 84 541
Amiel, Y.Cowell, F. A. 1994 Income inequality and social welfareTaxation, Poverty and Income DistributionCreedy, J.193AldershotEdward Elgar
Amiel, Y.Cowell, F. A. 1998 Distributional orderings and the transfer principle: a re-examinationResearch on Economic Inequality 8 195
Amiel, Y.Cowell, F. A. 1999 Thinking about InequalityCambridgeCambridge University Press
Amiel, Y.Cowell, F. A.Gaertner, W. 2008
Amiel, Y.Cowell, F. A.Gaertner, W. 2009 To be or not to be involved: a questionnaire–experimental view on Harsanyi’s utilitarian ethicsSocial Choice and Welfare 32 253
Anand, P.Wailoo, A. 2000 Utilities vs rights to publicly provided goods: arguments and evidence from health-care rationingEconomica 67 543
Andersson, F.Lyttkens, C. 1999 Preferences for equity in health behind a veil of ignoranceHealth Economics 8 369
Aristotle, 1976 The Nicomachean EthicsThomson, J. A. K.HarmondsworthPenguin
Arneson, R. 1989 Equality and equal opportunity for welfarePhilosophical Studies 56 77
Arrow, K. J. 1951 Social Choice and Individual ValuesNew YorkWiley
Atkinson, A. 1970 On the measurement of inequalityJournal of Economic Theory 2 244
Aumann, R.Maschler, M. 1985 Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the TalmudJournal of Economic Theory 36 195
Bar-Hillel, M.Yaari, M. 1993 Judgments of distributive justicePsychological Perspectives on JusticeMellers, B.Baron, J.55CambridgeCambridge University Press
Beckman, S.Formby, J.Smith, J.Zheng, B. 2002 Envy, malice and Pareto efficiency: an experimental examinationSocial Choice and Welfare 19 349
Bell, J.Schokkaert, E. 1992 Interdisciplinary theory and research on justiceJustice: Interdisciplinary PerspectivesScherer, K.237CambridgeCambridge University Press
Bernasconi, M. 2002 How should income be divided? Questionnaire evidence from the theory of impartial preferencesJournal of Economics 9 163
Bleichrodt, H.Doctor, J.Stolk, E. 2005 A nonparametric elicitation of the equity-efficiency trade-off in cost-utility analysisJournal of Health Economics 24 655
Bosmans, K.Lauwers, L. 2007
Bosmans, K.Schokkaert, E. 2004 Social welfare, the veil of ignorance and purely individual risk: an empirical examinationResearch on Economic Inequality 11 85
Bosmans, K.Schokkaert, E. 2009 Equality preference in the claims problem: a questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensionsSocial Choice and Welfare 33 533
Bossert, W.Fleurbaey, M. 1996 Redistribution and compensationSocial Choice and Welfare 13 343
Cappelen, A.Hole, A. D.Sorensen, E.Tungodden, B. 2011 The importance of moral reflection and self-reported data in a dictator game with productionSocial Choice and Welfare 36 105
Carlsson, F.Daruvala, D.Johansson-Stenman, O. 2005 Are people inequality averse or just risk averseEconomica 72 375
Cohen, G. 1989 On the currency of egalitarian justiceEthics 99 906
Cohen, G. 1990 Equality of what? On welfare, goods and capabilitiesRecherches Économiques de Louvain 56 357
Cuadras-Morató, X.Pinto-Prades, J.-L.Abellán-Perpiñán, J.-M. 2001 Equity considerations in health care: the relevance of claimsHealth Economics 10 187
d’Aspremont, C.Gevers, L. 1977 Equity and the informational basis of collective choiceReview of Economic Studies 44 199
Deutsch, M. 1983 Current social psychological perspectives on justiceEuropean Journal of Social Psychology 13 305
Doctor, J.Miyamoto, J.Bleichrodt, H. 2009 When are person tradeoffs validJournal of Health Economics 28 1018
Dolan, P. 1998 The measurement of individual utility and social welfareJournal of Health Economics 17 39
Dolan, P.Edlin, R.Tsuchiya, A.Wailoo, A. 2007 It ain’t what you do, it’s the way that you do it: characteristics of procedural justice and their importance in social decision-makingJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization 64 157
Dolan, P.Olsen, J. A.Menzel, P.Richardson, J. 2003 An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in healthHealth Economics 12 545
Dolan, P.Shaw, R.Tsuchiya, A.Williams, A. 2005 QALY maximisation and people’s preferences: a methodological review of the literatureHealth Economics 14 197
Dolan, P.Tsuchiya, A. 2005 Health priorities and public preferences: the relative importance of past health experience and future health prospectsJournal of Health Economics 24 703
Dolan, P.Tsuchiya, A. 2009 The social welfare function and individual responsibility: some theoretical issues and empirical evidenceJournal of Health Economics 28 210
Dworkin, R. 1981 What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfarePhilosophy and Public Affairs 10 185
Dworkin, R. 1981 What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resourcesPhilosophy and Public Affairs 10 283
Ebert, U. 2009 Taking empirical studies seriously: the principle of concentration and the measurement of welfare and inequalitySocial Choice and Welfare 32 555
Elster, J. 1992 Local JusticeCambridgeCambridge University Press
Evans, R. 1984 Strained MercyTorontoButterworths
Faravelli, M. 2007 How context matters: a survey based experiment on distributive justiceJournal of Public Economics 91 1399
Fehr, E.Gächter, S. 2000 Cooperation and punishment in public goods experimentsAmerican Economic Review 90 980
Fleurbaey, M. 1995 Three solutions for the compensation problemJournal of Economic Theory 65 505
Fleurbaey, M. 2003 On the informational basis of social choiceSocial Choice and Welfare 21 347
Fleurbaey, M. 2008 Fairness, Responsibility and WelfareOxfordOxford University Press
Fleurbaey, M.Maniquet, F. 2008 Fair social orderingsEconomic Theory 34 25
Fleurbaey, M.Mongin, P. 2005 The news of the death of welfare economics is greatly exaggeratedSocial Choice and Welfare 25 381
Fleurbaey, M.Schokkaert, E. 2009 Unfair inequalities in health and health careJournal of Health Economics 28 73
Fong, C. 2001 Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistributionJournal of Public Economics 82 225
Frohlich, N.Oppenheimer, J.Eavey, C. 1987 Choices of principles of distributive justice in experimental groupsAmerican Journal of Political Science 31 606
Gächter, S.Riedl, A. 2005 Moral property rights in bargaining with infeasible claimsManagement Science 51 249
Gächter, S.Riedl, A. 2006 Dividing justly in bargaining problems with claims: normative judgments and actual negotiationsSocial Choice and Welfare 27 571
Gaertner, W. 1992 Distributive judgmentsSocial Choice and Bargaining Perspectives on Distributive JusticeGaertner, W.Klemisch-Ahlert, M.Benhabib, J.Bisin, A.Jackson, M.93AmsterdamNorth-Holland
Gaertner, W. 2008 Individual rights versus economic growthJournal of Human Development 9 389
Gaertner, W. 2009 A Primer in Social Choice TheoryOxfordOxford University Press
Gaertner, W.Jungeilges, J. 2002 Evaluation via extended orderings: empirical findings from Western and Eastern EuropeSocial Choice and Welfare 19 29
Gaertner, W.Jungeilges, J.Neck, R. 2001 Cross-cultural equity evaluations: a questionnaire–experimental approachEuropean Economic Review 45 953
Gaertner, W.Schwettmann, L. 2007 Equity, responsibility and the cultural dimensionEconomica 74 627
Gaertner, W.Xu, Y. 2004 Procedural choiceEconomic Theory 24 335
Gaertner, W.Xu, Y. 2009 Individual choices in a non-consequentialist framework: a procedural approachArguments for a Better World. Essays in Honor of Amartya SenBasu, K.Kanbur, R.148New YorkOxford University Press
Gamliel, E.Peer, E. 2006 Positive versus negative framing affects justice judgmentsSocial Justice Research 19 307
Gamliel, E.Peer, E. 2010 Attribute framing affects the perceived fairness of health care allocation principlesJudgment and Decision Making 5 11
Güth, W.Kliemt, H. 2010 What ethics can learn from experimental economics – if anythingEuropean Journal of Political Economy 26 302
Hammond, P. 1976 Equity, Arrow’s conditions and Rawls’s difference principleEconometrica 44 793
Harsanyi, J. 1953 Cardinal utility in welfare economics and the theory of risk-takingJournal of Political Economy 61 434
Harsanyi, J. 1955 Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics and interpersonal comparisons of utilityJournal of Political Economy 63 309
Harsanyi, J. 1977 Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social SituationsCambridgeCambridge University Press
Harsanyi, J. 1978 Bayesian decision theory and utilitarian ethicsAmerican Economic Review 68 223
Hausman, D. 2000
Herne, K.Suojanen, M. 2004 The role of information in choices over income distributionsJournal of Conflict Resolution 48 173
Herrero, C.Moreno-Ternero, J.Ponti, G. 2010 On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental studySocial Choice and Welfare 34 145
Herrero, C.Villar, A. 2001 The three musketeers: four classical solutions to bankruptcy problemsMathematical Social Sciences 42 307
Homans, G. 1958 Social behavior as exchangeAmerican Journal of Sociology 63 597
Hurley, J.Buckley, N.Cuff, K.Giacomini, M.Cameron, D. 2011 Judgements regarding the fair division of goods: the impact of verbal versus quantitative descriptions of alternative divisionsSocial Choice and Welfare 37 341
Johannesson, M.Gerdtham, U.-G. 1996 A note on the estimation of the equity–efficiency trade-off for QALY’sJournal of Health Economics 15 359
Johansson-Stenman, O.Carlsson, F.Daruvala, D. 2002 Measuring future grandparents’ preferences for equality and relative standingEconomic Journal 112 363
Jungeilges, J.Theisen, T h. 2011 State dependence in sequential equity judgementsSocial Choice and Welfare 37 97
Kahneman, D.Knetsch, J.Thaler, R. 1986 Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: entitlements in the marketAmerican Economic Review 76 728
Kalai, E.Smorodinsky, M. 1975 Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problemEconometrica 43 513
Klemisch-Ahlert, M. 1992 Distributive results in bargaining experimentsSocial Choice and Bargaining Perspectives on Distributive JusticeGaertner, W.Klemisch-Ahlert, M.Heidelberg, Berlin and New YorkSpringer Verlag
Kolm, S.-C. 1996 Modern Theories of JusticeCambridge, MAMIT Press
Konow, J. 1996 A positive theory of economic fairnessJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization 31 13
Konow, J. 2001 Fair and square: the four sides of distributive justiceJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46 137
Konow, J. 2003 Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theoriesJournal of Economic Literature 41 1188
Konow, J. 2009
Konow, J. 2009 Is fairness in the eye of the beholder? An impartial spectator analysis of justiceSocial Choice and Welfare 33 101
Lindholm, L.Emmelin, M.Rosén, M. 1997 Health maximization rejected: the view of Swedish politiciansEuropean Journal of Public Health 7 405
Lindholm, L.Rosén, M. 1998 On the measurement of the nation’s equity adjusted healthHealth Economics 7 621
Luce, R.Raiffa, H. 1957 Games and DecisionsNew YorkWiley
Magdalou, B.Moyes, P. 2009 Deprivation, welfare and inequalitySocial Choice and Welfare 32 253
Maniquet, F. 1999 L’équité en environnement économiqueRevue Économique 50 787
McClelland, G.Rohrbaugh, J. 1978 Who accepts the Pareto axiom? The role of utility and equity in arbitration decisionsBehavioral Science 23 446
Menzel, P. 1999 How should what economists call “social values” be measuredJournal of Ethics 3 249
Miller, D. 1976 Social JusticeOxfordClarendon Press
Miller, D. 1994 Review of Scherer, K. (ed.), Justice: interdisciplinary perspectivesSocial Justice Research 7 167
Mongin, P. 2001 The impartial observer theorem of social ethicsEconomics and Philosophy 17 147
Moulin, H. 1987 Equal or proportional division of a surplus, and other methodsInternational Journal of Game Theory 16 161
Moulin, H. 2002 Axiomatic cost and surplus-sharingHandbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 1Arrow, K.Sen, A.Suzumura, K.289AmsterdamNorth-Holland
Nord, E. 1995 The person-trade-off approach to valuing health care programsMedical Decision Making 15 201
Nussbaum, M. 2000 Women and Human Development: The Capabilities ApproachCambridgeCambridge University Press
Nussbaum, M. 2006 Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species MembershipCambridge, MAHarvard University Press
Olsen, J. A. 2000 A note on eliciting distributive preferences for healthJournal of Health Economics 19 541
Pinto-Prades, J.-L.Abellán-Perpiñán, J.-M. 2005 Measuring the health of populations: the veil of ignorance approachHealth Economics 14 69
Putnam, H. 2008 Capabilities and two ethical theoriesJournal of Human Development 9 377
Rawls, J. 1971 A Theory of JusticeCambridge, MAHarvard University Press
Rawls, J. 1993 Political LiberalismNew YorkColumbia University Press
Roberts, K. 1980 Possibility theorems with interpersonally comparable welfare levelsReview of Economic Studies 47 409
Rodriguez-Miguez, E.Pinto-Prades, J.-L. 2002 Measuring the social importance of concentration or dispersion of individual health benefitsHealth Economics 11 43
Roemer, J. 1993 A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian plannerPhilosophy and Public Affairs 22 146
Roemer, J. 1998 Equality of OpportunityCambridge, MAHarvard University Press
Roemer, J. 2002 Egalitarianism against the veil of ignoranceJournal of Philosophy 99 167
Rubinstein, A. 1999 Experience from a course in game theory: pre- and post-class problems sets as a didactic deviceGames and Economic Behavior 28 155
Samuelson, P. A. 1947 Foundations of Economic AnalysisCambridge, MAHarvard University Press
Scanlon, T. 1982 Contractualism and utilitarianismUtilitarianism and BeyondSen, A.Williams, B.103CambridgeCambridge University Press
Schmeidler, D. 1989 Subjective probability and expected utility without additivityEconometrica 57 571
Schokkaert, E.Capeau, B. 1991 Interindividual differences in opinions about distributive justiceKyklos 44 325
Schokkaert, E.Devooght, K. 2003 Responsibility-sensitive fair compensation in different culturesSocial Choice and Welfare 21 207
Schokkaert, E.Overlaet, B. 1989 Moral intuitions and economic models of distributive justiceSocial Choice and Welfare 6 19
Schwettmann, L. 2008
Sen, A. 1970 Collective Choice and Social WelfareSan FranciscoHolden Day
Sen, A. 1973 On Economic InequalityOxfordClarendon Press
Sen, A. 1979 Personal utilities and public judgements: or what’s wrong with welfare economicsEconomic Journal 89 537
Sen, A. 1980 Equality of whatChoice, Welfare and Measurement353OxfordBlackwell
Sen, A. 2009 The Idea of JusticeLondonAllen Lane
Sen, A.Williams, B. 1982 Utilitarianism and BeyondCambridgeCambridge University Press
Smith, A. 1759 The Theory of Moral SentimentsLondon and Edinburgh
Suzumura, K.Xu, Y. 2001 Characterizations of consequentialism and non-consequentialismJournal of Economic Theory 101 423
Swift, A. 1999 Public opinion and political philosophy: the relation between social-scientific and philosophical analyses of distributive justiceEthical Theory and Moral Practice 2 337
Thomson, W. 2001 On the axiomatic method and its recent applications to game theory and resource allocationSocial Choice and Welfare 18 327
Thomson, W. 2003 Axiomatic and game-theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems: a surveyMathematical Social Sciences 45 249
Törnblom, K. 1992 The social psychology of distributive justiceJustice: Interdisciplinary PerspectivesScherer, K.177CambridgeCambridge University Press
Traub, S.Seidl, C.Schmidt, U. 2009 An experimental study on individual choice, social welfare, and social preferencesEuropean Economic Review 53 385
Traub, S.Seidl, C.Schmidt, U.Levati, M. 2005 Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding – or somebody else? An experimental investigation of distributive justiceSocial Choice and Welfare 24 283
Tsuchiya, A.Dolan, P. 2007 Do NHS clinicians and members of the public share the same views about reducing inequalities in healthSocial Science and Medicine 64 2499
Tsuchiya, A.Dolan, P. 2009 Equality of what in health? Distinguishing between outcome egalitarianism and gain egalitarianismHealth Economics 18 147
Tsuchiya, A.Dolan, P.Shaw, R. 2003 Measuring people’s preferences regarding ageism in health: some methodological issues and some fresh evidenceSocial Science and Medicine 57 687
Tversky, A.Kahneman, D. 1981 The framing of decisions and the psychology of choiceScience 211 453
Ubel, P. 1999 How stable are people’s preferences for giving priority to severely ill patientsSocial Science and Medicine 49 895
Ubel, P.Baron, J.Asch, D. 1999 Social responsibility, personal responsibility, and prognosis in public judgments about transplant allocationBioethics 13 57
Vickrey, W. 1945 Measuring marginal utility by reactions to riskEconometrica 13 319
Wailoo, A.Anand, P. 2005 The nature of procedural preferences for rational health care decisionsSocial Science and Medicine 60 223
Walster, E.Walster, W.Berscheid, E. 1973 New directions in equity researchJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 25 151
Weymark, J. 1991 A reconsideration of the Harsanyi–Sen debate on utilitarianismInterpersonal Comparisons of Well-BeingElster, J.Roemer, J.255CambridgeCambridge University Press
Williams, A. 1997 Intergenerational equity: an exploration of the “ fair innings” argumentHealth Economics 6 117
Yaari, M.Bar-Hillel, M. 1984 On dividing justlySocial Choice and Welfare 1 1
Young, P. 1994 Equity in Theory and PracticePrincetonPrinceton University Press

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.