Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:55:56.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - How the (In)Ability of Using One’s Disability Strategically Reinforces Inequality and Precariousness amongst Disabled Workers

The Case of France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2024

By
Sarah Richard  and
Sophie Hennekam
Edited by
Elina Meliou ,
Joana Vassilopoulou  and
Mustafa F. Ozbilgin
Elina Meliou
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Joana Vassilopoulou
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Mustafa F. Ozbilgin
Affiliation:
Brunel University
Get access

Summary

This chapter presents three empirical studies on disabled individuals who use their disability strategically as they navigate the labour market. In our first case, we reveal that disabled employees in France reflect on factors on societal, organizational, and individual levels. More specifically, they determine whether the quota system can be used to their own advantage, decreasing their precarious position in the labour market. In the second case study, we draw on 257 qualitative surveys with individuals with mental health conditions in a variety of countries and outline how these individuals make their career choices. More specifically, we show how they self-select into sectors in which the characteristics related to their mental illness can be turned into an advantage. The third case presented highlights that disabled individuals use social comparison based on the characteristics of their disability when determining how they compare with other disabled workers. When they feel their disability characteristics are less stigmatizing than that of others, they tend to use this strategically, enhancing their own employability, securing less precarious employment. Through these three cases, we show the inequalities that exist within the population of disabled workers. More specifically, individuals with a disability in countries with less constraining disability legislation and individuals whose disability is more stigmatizing in nature are more likely to end up in employment that is characterized by low wages, few career development opportunities, little autonomy, and unstable or hazardous working conditions. Practical implications and avenues for future research are provided.

Keywords

disabilitydisabled workersinequalityprecarityFrance
Type
Chapter
Information
Diversity and Precarious Work During Socio-Economic Upheaval
Exploring the Missing Link
 , pp. 79 - 98
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubin, C., & Daniel, C. (2019–2020). Handicaps et emploi. Rapport thématique 2019–2020 de l’Inspection générale des affaires sociales. www.igas.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/rapport_igas-2020handicapsetemploi_interactif.pdf.Google Scholar
Baldwin, M. L. & Johnson, W. G. (2006). A critical review of studies of discrimination against workers with disabilities. In , W. M. Rodgers, (Ed.), Handbook on the economics of discrimination (pp. 119–160). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Barnes, C., & Mertens, D. M. (2008). An Ethical Agenda in Disability Research: Rhetoric or Reality. In , D. M. Mertens, and , P. E. Ginsberg, (eds.) The Handbook of Social Research Ethics. London: Sage, 485–473.Google Scholar
Beatty, J. E., Baldridge, D. C., Boehm, S. A., Kulkarni, M. & Colella, A. J. (2019). On the treatment of persons with disabilities in organizations: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management, 58(2), 119–137.Google Scholar
Böhm, S., Baumgärtner, M. K., & Dwertmann, D.J. (2013) Berufliche Inklusion von Menschen mit Behinderung: Best Practices aus dem ersten Arbeitsmarkt. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzykcy, A. Z., Boehm, S. A., & Baldridge, D. C. (2019). Fostering sustainable careers across the lifespan: The role of disability, idiosyncratic deals and perceived work ability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 185–198.Google Scholar
Carrieri, L., Sgaramella, T. M., Bortolon, F., Stenta, G., Fornaro, L., Cracco, A., & Soresi, S. (2014). Determinants of on-the-job-barriers in employed persons with multiple sclerosis: The role of disability severity and cognitive indices. Work, 47(4), 509–520.Google Scholar
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). “Mental illness”. Available at: www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/basics/mental-illness.htm.Google Scholar
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). (2006). United Nations. Retrieved from www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html (accessed 15 April 2019).Google Scholar
Corbière, M., Zaniboni, S., Lecomte, T., Bond, G., Gilles, P. Y., Lesage, A. & Goldner, E. (2011). Job acquisition for people with severe mental illness enrolled in supported employment programs: A theoretically grounded empirical study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 21(3), 342–354.Google Scholar
Corby, S., William, L. & Richard, S. (2019). Combatting disability discrimination: A comparison of France and Great Britain. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 25(1), 41–56.Google Scholar
Corrigan, P. W., & Watson, A. C. (2002). The paradox of self-stigma and mental illness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9(1), 35–53.Google Scholar
Elraz, H. (2018). Identity, mental health and work: How employees with mental health conditions recount stigma and the pejorative discourse of mental illness. Human Relations, 7(5), 722–741.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2016). Disability and labour market integration. Employment, social affairs and inclusion. Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Follmer, K. B., & Jones, K. S. (2018). Mental Illness in the Workplace: An Interdisciplinary Review and Organizational Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 44(1), 325–351.Google Scholar
Golub, S. (2010). Legal Empowerment: Practitioners’ Perspectives. Rome: International Development Law Organization.Google Scholar
Grammenos, S. (2013). European Comparative Data on Europe 2020 and People with Disabilities. Ithaca NY: Cornell University ILR School.Google Scholar
Harris, L. M., Matthews, L. R., Penrose-Wall, J., Alam, A. & Jaworski, A. (2014). Perspectives on barriers to employment for job seekers with mental illness and additional substance-use problems’. Health and Social Care in the Community, 22(1), 67–77.Google Scholar
Hemphill, E., & Kulik, C. T. (2017). The tyranny of fit: Yet another barrier to mainstream employment for disabled people in sheltered employment. Social Policy & Administration, 51(7), 1119–1134.Google Scholar
Hennekam, S. (2019). How to Adapt a Research Design to the Particularities of a Vulnerable Group of Workers Under Study. SAGE Research Methods Cases. DOI: 10.4135/9781526474391.Google Scholar
Hennekam, S., Follmer, K., & Beatty, J. E. (2021). The paradox of mental illness and employment: A person-job fit lens. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(15), 3244–3271.Google Scholar
INSEE, (2020). Emploi, chômage, revenus du travail. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.Google Scholar
Jammaers, E., Zanoni, P. & Hardonk, S. (2016). Constructing positive identities in ableist workplaces: Disabled employees’ discursive practices engaging with the discourse of lower productivity. Human Relations, 69(6), 1365–1386.Google Scholar
Jans., L. H., Kaye, H. S. & Jones., E. C. (2012). Getting hired: Successfully employed people with disabilities offer advice on disclosure, interviewing, and job search. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22(2), 155–165.Google Scholar
Kirsh, B., Stergiou-Kita, M., Gewurtz, R., Dawson, D., Krupa, T., Lysaght, R., & Shaw, L. (2009). From margins to mainstream: what do we know about work integration for persons with brain injury, mental illness and intellectual disability? Work, 32(4), 391–405.Google Scholar
Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49.Google Scholar
Kulkarni, M. (2016). Organizational career development initiatives for employees with a disability. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 1662–1679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leufstadius, C., Eklund, M., & Erlandsson, L. (2009). Meaningfulness in work: Experiences among employed individuals with persistent mental illness. Work, 34(1), 21–32.Google Scholar
Levinson, D., Lakoma, M. D., Petukhova, M., Schoenbaumn, M., Zaslavsky, A. M., Angermeyer, M. … Gureje, O. (2010). Associations of serious mental illness with earnings: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 197(2), 114–121.Google Scholar
Mik-Meyer, N. (2016). Othering, ableism and disability: A discursive analysis of co-workers’ construction of colleagues with visible impairments. Human Relations, 69(6), 1341–1363.Google Scholar
Nardodkar, R., Pathare, S., Ventriglio, A., Castaldelli-Maia, J., Javate, K., Torales, J. & Bhugra, D. (2016). Legal protection of the right to work and employment for persons with mental health problems: A review of legislation across the world. International Review of Psychiatry, 28(4), 375–384.Google Scholar
Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability and Society, 28(7), 1024–1026.Google Scholar
Perotte, D. (2013). Handicapés: les entreprises manquent de candidats diplômés. Les Echos, 21 novembre, p. 4.Google Scholar
Reilly, N. P., Bocketti, S. P., Maser, S. A., & Wennet, C. L. (2006). Benchmarks affect perceptions of prior disability in a structured interview. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 489–500.Google Scholar
Richard, S., & Hennekam, S. (2021a). When Can a Disability Quota System Empower Disabled Individuals in the Workplace? The Case of France. Work, Employment and Society, 35(5), 837–855.Google Scholar
Richard, S., & Hennekam, S. (2021b). Constructing a positive identity as a disabled worker through social comparison: The role of stigma and disability characteristics. Journal of Vocational Behavior 125.Google Scholar
Richard, S., Lemaire, C., & Church-Morel, A. (2021). Beyond identity consciousness: Human resource management practices and mental health conditions in sheltered workshops. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(15), 3218–3243.Google Scholar
Sabat, I. E., Lindsey, A. P., King, E. B., Winslow, C., Jones, K. P., Membere, A. & Smith, N. A. (2019). Stigma Expression Outcomes and Boundary Conditions: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35, 171–186.Google Scholar
Santuzzi, A. M., & Waltz, P. R. (2016). Disability in the workplace: A unique and variable identity. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1111–1135.Google Scholar
Santuzzi, A.M., Waltz, P.R, Finkelstein, L.M., & Rupp, D. (2014) Invisible Disabilities: Unique Challenges for Employees and Organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(2), 204–219.Google Scholar
Sargeant, M., Radevich-Katsaroumpa, E., & Innesti, A. (2018). Disability quotas: Past or future policy? Economic and Industrial Democracy. 39(3), 404–421.Google Scholar
Schur, L., Kruse, D. & Blanck, P. (2013). People with disabilities: Sidelined or mainstreamed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schur, L., Kruse, D., Blasi, J. & Blanck, P. (2009). Is disability disabling in all workplaces? Workplace disparities and corporate culture. Industrial Relations, 48(3), 381–410.Google Scholar
Smith, A. N., Watkins, M. B., Ladge, J. J., & Carlton, P. (2019). Making the invisible visible: Paradoxical effects of intersectional invisibility on the career experiences of executive Black women. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1705–1734.Google Scholar
Talebi, M., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2016). The stigma of seeking help for mental health issues: Mediating roles of support and coping and the moderating role of symptom profile. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(8), 470–482.Google Scholar
Tims, M., Derks, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2016). Job crafting and its relationships with person–job fit and meaningfulness: A three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 44–53.Google Scholar
van Woerkom, M., & Meyers, M. C. (2015). My strengths count! Effects of a strengths-based psychological climate on positive affect and job performance. Human Resource Management, 54(1), 81–103.Google Scholar
van Woerkom, M., Oerlemans, W. G. A., & Bakker, A. B. (2016). Strengths use and work engagement: A weekly diary study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 384–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Schrader, S., Malzer, V., and Bruyere, S. (2014). Perspectives on disability disclosure: the importance of employer practices and workplace climate. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 26(4), 237–255.Google Scholar
Vornholt, K., Villotti, P., Muschalla, B., Bauer, J., Colella, A., Zijlstra, F. et al. (2018). Disability and employment–overview and highlights. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(1), 40–55.Google Scholar
Wang, J. L., Patten, S., Currie, S., Sareen, J. & Schmitz, N. (2011). Perceived needs for and use of workplace accommodations by individuals with depressive and/or anxiety disorder. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(11), 1268–1272.Google Scholar
Weissman, J., Russell, D., Jay, M., Beasley, J. M., Malaspina, D., & Pegus, C. (2017). Disparities in health care utilization and functional limitations among adults with serious psychological distress, 2006–2014. Psychiatric Services, 68(7), 653–659.Google Scholar
Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 15–19.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2011). World Report on Disability: Summary, 2011. Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×