Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 29–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adams, R., Nuevo, A. M. & Egi, T. (2011). Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output, and SLA: Does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning and learner–learner interactions? Modern Language Journal, 11(Suppl. issue), 42–63.Google Scholar

Adams, R. & Oliver, R. (2019). Teaching through peer interaction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Adams, R. & Ross–Feldman, L. (2008). Does writing influence learner attention to form? In Belcher, D. & Hirvela, A. (eds.), The oral–literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 243–265). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Aljaafeh, A. & Lantolf, J. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483.Google Scholar

Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12(2),183–210.Google Scholar

Carpenter, H., Jeon, S., MacGregor, D. & Mackey, A. (2006). Learner’s interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 209–236.Google Scholar

Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206–257). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Doughty, C. & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1994). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. In Ellis, N. C. (ed.), Implicit and explicit language learning (pp. 79–114). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18.Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. and Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(5), 575–600.Google Scholar

Gass, S. (2013). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gass, S., Mackey, A. & Ross–Feldman, L. (2011). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 61(S1), 189–220.Google Scholar

Gass, S. & Madden, C. (eds.). (1985). Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Goo, J. & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 127–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han, Z. & Kim, J. (2008). Corrective recasts: What teachers might want to know. Language Learning Journal, 36(1), 35–44.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction: Differential effects on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 1–36.Google Scholar

Kamiya, N. (2015). The effectiveness of intensive and extensive recasts on L2 acquisition for implicit and explicit knowledge. Linguistics and Education, 29, 59–72.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. (ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Error correction: Students’ versus teachers’ perceptions. Language Awareness, 14(2–3), 112–127.Google Scholar

Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and L2 development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 37–63.Google Scholar

Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, S. (2014). Oral corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 68(2), 196–198.Google Scholar

Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loewen, S. & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 361–377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Loewen, S. & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 536–556.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Long, M., Inagaki, S. & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 357–371.Google Scholar

Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399–432.Google Scholar

Lyster, R. & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 269–300.Google Scholar

Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.Google Scholar

Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (2013). Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyster, R. & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302.Google Scholar

Lyster, R., Saito, K. & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(4), 1–40.Google Scholar

Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587.Google Scholar

Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405–430.Google Scholar

Mackey, A. (2013). Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mackey, A., Al–Khalil, M., Atanassova, G., Hama, M., Logan–Terry, A. & Nakatsukasa, K. (2007). Teachers’ intentions and learners’ perceptions about corrective feedback in the L2 classroom. Innovations in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 129–152.Google Scholar

Mackey, A. & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mackey, A. & Oliver, R. (2002). Interactional feedback and children’s L2 development. System, 30(4), 459–477.Google Scholar

Mackey, A., Oliver, R. & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS–NNS and NNS–NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53(1), 35–66.Google Scholar

Mackey, A. & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338–356.Google Scholar

McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 79–103.Google Scholar

McDonough, K. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 323–338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59(2), 411–452.Google Scholar

Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language awareness, 9(1), 34–51.Google Scholar

Nassaji, H. & Swain, M. (2009). A Vygotskyan perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help in the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9(1), 34–51.Google Scholar

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS–NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 459–481.Google Scholar

Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pair work. Language Learning, 50(1), 119–150.Google Scholar

Oliver, R. & Grote, E. (2010). The provision and uptake of different types of recasts in child and adult ESL learners. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(3), 21.1–26.22.Google Scholar

Oliver, R. & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 519–533.Google Scholar

Oliver, R., Philp., J. & Mackey, A. (2008). Age, teacher guidance and the linguistic outcomes of task-based interaction. In Philp, J., Oliver, R. & Mackey, A. (eds.), Child’s play? Second language acquisition and the younger learner (pp. 131–147). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Panova, I. & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 573–595.Google Scholar

Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(4), 493–527.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L. & Mills, S. V. (2006). An exploratory study of differing perceptions of error correction between a teacher and students: Bridging the gap. Applied Language Learning, 16(1), 55–74.Google Scholar

Ranta, L. & Lyster, R. (2007). A cognitive approach to improving immersion students’ oral language abilities: The Awareness–Practice–Feedback sequence. In DeKeyser, R. (ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 141–160). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, J. & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. In Norris., J. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Saito, K. (2013). Re-examining effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development: The role of explicit phonetic information. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 1–29.Google Scholar

Sato, M. & Ballinger, S. (2012). Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-method examination. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sato, M. & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development, monitoring, practice and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 591–626.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 263–300.Google Scholar

Sheen, Y. & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. In Hinkel, E. (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 593–610). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Simard, D. & Jean, G. (2011). An exploration of L2 teachers’ use of pedagogical interventions devised to draw L2 learners’ attention to form. Language Learning, 61(3), 759–785.Google Scholar

Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 205–244.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (2010). Talking it through: Languaging as a source of learning. In Batstone, R. (ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 112–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of second language writing, 17(2), 102–118.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. (2019). The intersection between SLA and feedback research. In Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed., pp. 85–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. & Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 409–431.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010a). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–214.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010b). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J., Young, S. & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107.Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M. & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36(3), 353–371.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Frear, D. & Chiu, Y. (2015). The effect of focused and unfocused indirect written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ accuracy in new pieces of writing. System, 53, 24–34.Google Scholar

Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Guenette, D. (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback in writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(1), 40–53.Google Scholar

Hendrickson, J. (1980). The treatment of error in written work. Modern Language Journal, 64(2), 216–221.Google Scholar

Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 305–313.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 66(2), 140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69–85.Google Scholar

Lee, I. (2017). Working hard or working smart: Comprehensive or focused written corrective feedback in L2 academic contexts. In J. Bitchener, N. Storch, R. Wette, (eds.), Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students (pp. 168–180). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Li, S. (2017). The efficacy of written corrective feedback on second language development: The impact of feedback type, revision type, learning motivation and strtaegies. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar

Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2), 183–218.Google Scholar

Qi, G. (2015). The impact of explicitness of written CF, targeted linguistic form and proficiency level on the effectiveness of written CF: A mixed-methods study. Unpublished doctoral thesis, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar

Robb, T., Ross, S. & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. Tesol Quarterly, 20(1), 83–95.Google Scholar

Rummel, S. (2014). Student and teacher beliefs about written CF and the effect these beliefs have on uptake: A multiple case study of Laos and Kuwait. Unpublished doctoral thesis, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar

Rummel, S. & Bitchener, J. (2015). The effectiveness of written corrective feedback and the impact Lao learners’ beliefs have on uptake. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 64–82.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Semke, H. D. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17(3), 195–202.Google Scholar

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. Tesol Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283.Google Scholar

Sheen, Y. (2011). Corrective feedback, individual differences and second language learning. London: Springer.Google Scholar

Sheen, Y., Wright, D. & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556–569.Google Scholar

Sheppard, K. (1992). Two feedback types: Do they make a difference? RELC Journal, 23(1), 103–110.Google Scholar

Shintani, N. & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 286–306. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011.Google Scholar

Shintani, N., Ellis, R. & Suzuki, W. (2014). Effects of written feedback and revision on learners’ accuracy in using two English grammatical structures. Language Learning, 64(1), 103–131. DOI:10.1111/lang.12029.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stefanou, C. & Revesz, A. (2015). Direct written corrective feedback, learners differences and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural reference. Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 263–282.Google Scholar

Tomlin, R. S. & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 183–203.Google Scholar

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369.Google Scholar

Truscott, J. & Hsu, A. Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 292–305.Google Scholar

Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H. & Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy. ITL-Review of Applied Linguistics, 156, 279–296.Google Scholar

Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H. & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41.Google Scholar

Amaral, L. and Meurers, D. (2011). On using intelligent computer-assisted language learning in real-life foreign language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 23(1), 4–24.Google Scholar

Anderson-Hsieh, J. (1994). Interpreting visual feedback on suprasegmentals in computer assisted pronunciation instruction. CALICO Journal, 11(4), 5–21.Google Scholar

Audacity (n.d.). www.audacityteam.org/ (accessed on March 6, 2018).Google Scholar

Bestgen, Y. & Granger, S. (2011). Categorising spelling errors to assess L2 writing. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 21(2–3), 235–252.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118. DOI:10.1016/jslw.2007.11.004.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. (2012). Written corrective feedback for L2 development: Current knowledge and future research. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 855–860. DOI:10.1002/tesq.62.Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Patron, Bon (n.d.). http://bonpatron.com/ (accessed March 15, 2018).Google Scholar

Brett, D. (2004). Computer generated feedback on vowel production by learners of English as a second language. ReCALL, 16(1), 103–113. DOI:10.1017/s0958344004000813.Google Scholar

Brill, E. & Moore, R.C. (2000). An improved error model for noisy channel spelling correction. In Proceedings of 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China, October 2000 (pp. 286–293). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar

Burston, J. (1998). Antidote 98 [review]. CALICO Journal, 16(2), 197–212.Google Scholar

Burston, J. (2001). Exploiting the potential of a computer-based grammar checker in conjunction with self-monitoring strategies with advanced level students of French. CALICO Journal, 18(3), 499–515.Google Scholar

Carey, M. (2004). CALL Visual feedback for pronunciation of vowels: Kay Sona-Match. CALICO Journal, 21(3), 1–32.Google Scholar

Chapelle, C. A. (2018, March 26). Week 5: Technology & Writing (Part 1). [Video file]. https://youtu.be/vJ5KSMT5m8A.Google Scholar

Chun, D. M. (1998). Signal analysis software of teaching discourse intonation. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 74–93. http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article4/.Google Scholar

Chun, D. M. (2007). Come ride the wave: But where is it taking us? CALICO Journal, 24(2), 239–252.Google Scholar

Coniam, D. (1999). Voice recognition software accuracy with second language speakers of English. System, 27(1), 49–64.Google Scholar

Coniam, D. (2002). Technology as an awareness-raising tool for sensitising teachers to features of stress and rhythm in English, Language Awareness, 11(1), 30–42. DOI:10.1080/09658410208667044.Google Scholar

Cucchiarini, C., Neri, A. & Strik, H. (2009). Oral proficiency training in Dutch L2: The contribution of ASR-based corrective feedback. Speech Communication, 51(10), 853–863.Google Scholar

Dagneaux, E., Denness, S. & Granger, S. (1998). Computer-aided error analysis. System, 26(2), 163–174.Google Scholar

Dalby, J. & Kewley-Port, D. (1999). Explicit pronunciation training using automatic speech recognition technology. CALICO, 16(3), 425–445.Google Scholar

Damerau, F. J. (1964). A technique for computer detection and correction of spelling errors. Communications of the ACM, 7(3), 171–176.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dikli, S. (2010). The nature of automated essay scoring feedback. CALICO Journal, 28(1), 99–134.Google Scholar

Dikli, S. & Bleyle, S. (2014). Automated essay scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback? Assessing Writing, 22, 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006.Google Scholar

Ehsani, F. & Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 54–73.Google Scholar

Engwall, O. (2012). Analysis of and feedback on phonetic features in pronunciation training with a virtual teacher. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 37–64. DOI:10.1080/09588221.2011.582845.Google Scholar

Eskenazi, M. (1999). Using Automatic Speech Processing for foreign language pronunciation tutoring: Some issues and a prototype. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 62–76.Google Scholar

eSpindle (n.d.). www.espindle.org/ (accessed March 15, 2018).Google Scholar

Fallman, D. (2002). The Penguin: Using the web as a database for descriptive and dynamic grammar and spell checking. Paper presented at the CHI 2002, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, MN, April 20–25, 2002.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–11.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181–201. DOI:10.1017/s0272263109990490.Google Scholar

Flor, M. & Futagi, Y. (2012). On using context for automatic correction of non-word misspellings in student essays. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA), 105–115, Montréal, Canada, June 3-8, 2012.Google Scholar

Flor, M. & Futagi, Y. (2013). Producing an annotated corpus with automatic spelling correction. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G. & Meunier, F. (eds.), Twenty years of learner corpus research: Looking back, moving ahead. corpora and language in use (pp. 139–154). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar

Godwin-Jones, R. (2009). Emerging technology: Speech tools and technologies. Language Learning & Technology, 13(3), 4–11. http://llt.msu.edu/vol13num3/emerging.pdf.Google Scholar

Hardison, D. (2004). Contextualized computer-based L2 prosody training: Evaluating the effects of discourse context and video input. CALICO Journal, 22(2), 175–190.Google Scholar

Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N. W., Merrill, P. F., Sudweeks, R. R., Strong-Krause, D. & Anderson, N. J. (2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 84–109. DOI:10.5054/tq.2010.213781.Google Scholar

Heift, T. (2010). Developing an intelligent tutor. CALICO Journal, 27(3), 443–459.Google Scholar

Heift, T. & Hegelheimer, V. (2017). Computer-assisted corrected feedback and language learning. In Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning (pp. 51–65). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Heift, T. & Schulze, M. (2015). Tutorial computer-assisted language learning.Language Teaching, 48(4), 471–490. DOI:10.1017/S0261444815000245.Google Scholar

Helfrich, A. & Music, B. (2000). Design and evaluation of grammar checkers in multiple languages. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2000), Vol. II (pp. 1036–1040). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. www.aclweb.org/anthology/C00-2153/.Google Scholar

Hincks, R. (2003). Speech technologies for pronunciation feedback and evaluation. ReCALL, 15(1), 3–20. DOI:10.1017/s0958344003000211.Google Scholar

Hirata, Y. (2004). Computer assisted pronunciation training for native English speakers learning Japanese pitch and durational contrasts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(3–4), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958822042000319629.Google Scholar

Hodge, V. J. and Austin, J. (2003): A comparison of standard spell checking algorithms and a novel binary neural approach. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15(5), 1073–1081.Google Scholar

Hovermale, D. J. (2008). SCALE: Spelling correction adapted for learners of English. Poster presentation at ICALL Special Interest Group pre-conference workshop, CALICO conference, March 18–22, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar

Hubbard, P. (2004). Learner training for effective use of CALL. In Fotos, S. & Browne, C. (eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 45–67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hubbard, P. (2013). Making a case for learner training in technology enhanced language learning environments. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 163–178.Google Scholar

Kim, I. S. (2006). Automatic speech recognition: Reliability and pedagogical implications for teaching pronunciation. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), 322–344.Google Scholar

Kommissarchik, J. & Komissarchik, E. (2000). Better accent tutor: Analysis and visualization of speech prosody. Proceedings of InSTILL 2000 (pp. 86–89). Dundee, Scotland.Google Scholar

Kukich, K. (1992). Techniques for automatically correcting words in text. ACM Computing Surveys, 24(4), 377–439.Google Scholar

Lavolette, E., Polio, C. & Kahng, J. (2015). The accuracy of computer-assisted feedback and students’ responses to it. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 50–68.Google Scholar

Lawley, J. (2016). Spelling: Computerised feedback for self-correction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(5), 868–880. DOI:10.1080/09588221.2015.1069746.Google Scholar

Leacock, C., Chodorow, M., Gamon, M. & Tetreault, , J. (2010). Automated grammatical error detection for language learners. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google Scholar

Levis, J. (2007). Computer technology in teaching and researching pronunciation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 184–202. DOI:10.1017/S0267190508070098.Google Scholar

Levis, J. & Pickering, L. (2004). Teaching intonation in discourse using speech visualization technology. System, 32(4), 505–524.Google Scholar

L’haire, S. (2007). Fipsortho: A spell checker for learners of French. ReCALL, 19(3), 137–161.Google Scholar

Liakin, D., Cardoso, W. & Liakina, N. (2015). Learning L2 pronunciation with a mobile speech recognizer: French /y/. CALICO Journal, 32(1), 1–25.Google Scholar

Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Link, S., Dursun, A., Karakaya, K. & Hegelheimer, V. (2014). Towards best ESL practices for implementing automated writing evaluation. CALICO Journal, 31(3), 323–344.Google Scholar

Lyster, R., Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (1999). A response to Truscott’s “What’s wrong with oral grammar correction.” Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 457.Google Scholar

Mitton, R. & Okada, T. (2007). The adaptation of an English spellchecker for Japanese writers. Paper presented at the Symposium on Second Language Writing. Nagoya, Japan, September 15–17, 2007.Google Scholar

Moats, L. (2005).How spelling supports reading and why it is more regular and predictable than you may think. American Educator, 29(4), 12–22.Google Scholar

Murphy-Judy, K. (2003). Sans-faute writing environment [review]. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 209–220.Google Scholar

Nagata, N. (2009). Robo-Sensei’s NLP-based error detection and feedback generation. CALICO Journal, 26(3), 562–579.Google Scholar

Nassaji, H. & Kartchava, E. (2017). Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ndiaye, M. & Vandeventer Faltin, A. (2003). A spell checker tailored to language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(2–3), 213–232.Google Scholar

Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C. & Strik, H. (2008). The effectiveness of computer-based speech corrective feedback for improving segmental quality in L2 Dutch. ReCALL, 20(2). DOI:10.1017/s0958344008000724.Google Scholar

Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H. & Boves, L. (2002). The pedagogy–technology interface in computer assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 441–467.Google Scholar

Nicholas, N., Debski, R. & Lagerberg, R. (2004). Skryba: An online orthography teaching tool for learners from bilingual backgrounds. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(3–4), 441–458.Google Scholar

Offerman, H. M. & Olson, D. J. (2016). Visual feedback and second language segmental production: The generalizability of pronunciation gains. System, 59, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.03.003.Google Scholar

Olmanson, J. (2007). Review of eSpindle vocabulary & spelling program online. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 18–28.Google Scholar

Olson, D. J. (2014). Benefits of visual feedback on segmental production in the L2 classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 173–192. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/olson.pdfGoogle Scholar

O’Shaughnessy, D. (2008). Invited paper: Automatic speech recognition: History, methods and challenges. Pattern Recognition, 41(10), 2965–2979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2008.05.008.Google Scholar

Pollock, J. J. & Zamora, A. (1984). Automatic spelling correction in scientific and scholarly text. Communications of the ACM, 27(4), 358–368.Google Scholar

Ranalli, J., Link, S. & Chukharev-Hudilainen, E. (2017). Automated writing evaluation for formative assessment of second language writing: Investigating the accuracy and usefulness of feedback as part of argument-based validation. Educational Psychology, 37(1), 8–25. DOI:10.1080/01443410.2015.1136407.Google Scholar

Ranalli, J., Yamashita, T. & Bappe, C. (2017). Comparing the quantity and quality of automated corrective feedback provided by Grammarly versus MS Word. Paper presented at CALICO 2017, Flagstaff, USA.Google Scholar

Regular expression. (2018). In Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression.Google Scholar

Reinders, H. & Hubbard, P. (2013). CALL and learner autonomy: Affordance and constraints. In Thomas, M., Reinders, H. & Warschauer, M. (eds.), Contemporary computer-assisted language learning (pp. 359–376). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Rimrott, A. & Heift, T. (2008). Evaluating Automatic Detection of Misspellings in German. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 73–92.Google Scholar

Sakaguchi, K., Mizumoto, T., Komachi, M. & Matsumoto, Y. (2012). Joint English spelling error correction and POS tagging for language learners writing. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2012), Mumbai, India (pp. 2357–2374).Google Scholar

Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Languge Learning & Technology, 13(1), 96–120.Google Scholar

Scott, C. (2000). Principles and methods of spelling instruction: Application for poor spellers. Topics in Language Disorders, 20(3), 66–82.Google Scholar

Shintani, N. & Aubrey, S. C. (2016). The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in a computer-mediated environment. Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 296–319.Google Scholar

Spellcheckplus (n.d.). http://spellcheckplus.com/ (accessed March 15, 2018).Google Scholar

Stevenson, M. & Phakiti, A. (2014). The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 51–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007.Google Scholar

Stirling, J. (2011). Teaching spelling to English language learners. Raleigh, NC: Lulu.Google Scholar

Truscott, J. (1999). What’s wrong with oral grammar correction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(4), 437.Google Scholar

Wachowicz, K., & Scott, B. (1999). Software that listens: It’s not a question of whether, it’s a question of how. CALICO Journal, 16(3), 253–276. www.jstor.org/stable/24147843.Google Scholar

Walker, N. R., Trofimovich, P., Cedergren, H. & Gatbonton, E. (2011). Using ASR technology in language training for specific purposes: A perspective from Quebec, Canada. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 721–743.Google Scholar

Wang, Y.-H. & Young, S. S.-C. (2014). A study of the design and implementation of the ASR-based iCASL system with corrective feedback to facilitate English learning. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 219–233.Google Scholar

Wang, Y.-H. & Young, S. S.-C. (2015). Effectiveness of feedback for enhancing English pronunciation in an ASR-based CALL system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 493–504. DOI:10.1111/jcal.12079.Google Scholar

WinPitch (n.d). Pitch Instruments Inc. www.winpitch.com (accessed on March 6, 2018).Google Scholar

Alibali, M., Flevares, L. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1997). Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand? Journal of Educational Psychology, 23(1), 183–194.Google Scholar

Allen, L. Q. (1995). The effects of emblematic features on the development and access of mental representations of French expressions. Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 521–529.Google Scholar

Allen, L. Q. (2000). Form–meaning connections and the French causative. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 69–84.Google Scholar

Brown, D. (2014). The type of linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 436–458.Google Scholar

Clark, J. M. & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.Google Scholar

Cohen, R. L. & Otterbein, N. (1992). The mnemonic effect of speech gestures: Pantomimic and non-pantomimic gestures compared. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4(2), 113–139.Google Scholar

Cook, S. W., Yip, T. K. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing makes memories that last. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 465–475.Google Scholar

Crowder, E. M. (1996). Gestures at work in sense-making science talk.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 173–208.Google Scholar

Dahl, T. I. & Ludvigsen, S. (2014). How I see what you’re saying: The role of gestures in native and foreign language listening comprehension. Modern Language Journal, 98(3), 813–833.Google Scholar

Davies, M. (2006). Paralinguistic focus on form. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 841–855.Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(3), 339–368.Google Scholar

Engelkamp, J. & Cohen, R. L. (1991). Current issues in memory of action events. Psychological Research, 53(3), 175–182.Google Scholar

Flevares, L. M. & Perry, M. (2001). How many do you see? The use of nonspoken representations in first-grade mathematics lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 330–345.Google Scholar

Gluhareva, D. & Prieto, P. (2017). Training with rhythmic beat gestures benefits L2 pronunciation in discourse-demanding situations. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 609–631.Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W. & Mitchell, Z. A. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20(3), 267–272.Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S. & Sandhofer, C. M. (1999). Gesture conveys substantive information to ordinary listeners. Developmental Science, 2(1), 67–74.Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S. & Singer, M. A. (2003). From children’s hands to adults’ ears: Gesture’s role in the learning process. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 509–520.Google Scholar

Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474.Google Scholar

Goo, J. & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 1–39.Google Scholar

Hirata, Y. & Kelly, S. D. (2010). Effects of lips and hands on auditory learning of second-language speech sounds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(2), 298–310.Google Scholar

Hirata, Y., Kelly, S. D., Huang, J. & Manansala, M. (2014). Effects of hand gestures on auditory learning of second-language vowel length contrasts. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(6), 2090–2101.Google Scholar

Hudson, N. (2011). Teacher gesture in a post-secondary English as a second language classroom: A sociocultural approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.Google Scholar

Inceoglu, S. (2015). Teacher gesture and lexical focus on form in a foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(2), 130–154.Google Scholar

Kamiya, N. (2012). Proactive and reactive focus on form and gestures in EFL classrooms in Japan. System, 40(3), 386–397.Google Scholar

Kamiya, N. (2018). The effect of learner age on the interpretation of the nonverbal behaviors of teachers and other students in identifying questions in the L2 classroom. Language Teaching Research, 22(1), 47–64.Google Scholar

Kelly, S. D. & Lee, A. (2012). When actions speak too much louder than words: Gesture disrupts word learning when phonetic demands are high. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(6), 793–807.Google Scholar

Kelly, S. D., McDevitt, T. & Esch, M. (2009). Brief training with co-speech gesture lends a hand to word learning in a foreign language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 313–334.Google Scholar

Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning, 54(1), 79–117.Google Scholar

Leonard, T. & Cummins, F. (2011). The temporal relation between beat gestures and speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(10), 1457–1471.Google Scholar

Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309–365.Google Scholar

Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634–654.Google Scholar

Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 361–386.Google Scholar

Loewen, S. & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 536–556.Google Scholar

Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.Google Scholar

Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (2013). Counterpoint piece: The case for variety in corrective feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Lyster, R. & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302.Google Scholar

Lyster, R., Saito, K. & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40.Google Scholar

Macedonia, M. & Klimesch, W. (2014). Long-term effects of gestures on memory for foreign language words trained in the classroom. Mind, Brain, and Education, 8(2), 74–88.Google Scholar

Macedonia, M. & Knösche, T. R. (2011). Body in mind: How gestures empower foreign language learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5(4), 196–211.Google Scholar

Macedonia, M., Müller, K. & Friederici, A. D. (2011). The impact of iconic gestures on foreign language word learning and its neural substrate. Human Brain Mapping, 32(6), 982–998.Google Scholar

Mackey, A., Gass, S. & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 471–497.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Y. & Dobs, A. M. (2017). Pedagogical gestures as interactional resources for teaching and learning tense and aspect in the ESL grammar classroom. Language Learning, 67(1), 7–42.Google Scholar

McCafferty, S. G. & Rosborough, A. (2014). Gesture as a private form of communication during lessons in an ESL-designated elementary classroom: A sociocultural perspective. TESOL Journal, 5(2), 225–246.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mohan, B. & Helmer, S. (1988). Context and second language development: Preschoolers’ comprehension of gestures. Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 275–292.Google Scholar

Morett, L. M. & Chang, L. Y. (2015). Emphasising sound and meaning: Pitch gestures enhance Mandarin lexical tone acquisition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(3), 347–353.Google Scholar

Nakatsukasa, K. (2016). Efficacy of recasts and gesture on the acquisition of locative prepositions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 771–799.Google Scholar

Nakatsukasa, K. (2017). Interlocutors’ gender impact on L2 acquisition: Analysis of L2 grammar acquisition via communicative tasks. In Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learner, instructor and researcher IDs (pp. 100–119). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nakatsukasa, K. (2019). Gesture-enhanced recasts have limited effects: A case of the regular past tense. Language Teaching Research, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819870283.Google Scholar

Perry, M., Birch, D. & Singleton, J. (1995). Constructing shared understanding: The role of nonverbal input in learning contexts. Contemporary Legal Issues, 6, 213–235.Google Scholar

Repetto, C., Pedroli, E. & Macedonia, M. (2017). Enrichment effects of gestures and pictures on abstract words in a second language. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2136.Google Scholar

Roth, W. (2001). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 365–392.Google Scholar

Roth, W. & Lawless, D. V. (2002a). Signs, deixis, and the emergence of scientific explanations. Semiotica, 138(1–4), 95–130.Google Scholar

Roth, W. & Lawless, D. V. (2002b). When up is down and down is up: Body orientation, proximity, and gestures as resources. Language in Society, 31(1), 1–28.Google Scholar

Russell, J. & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133–164). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Saito, K. & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form‐focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633.Google Scholar

Sime, D. (2006). What do learners make of teachers’ gestures in the language classroom? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 44(2), 211–230.Google Scholar

Sime, D. (2008). “Because of her gesture, it’s very easy to understand”: Learner’s perceptions of teachers’ gestures in the foreign language class. In McCafferty, S. G. & Stam, G. (eds.), Gesture in second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 259–279). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Smotrova, T. (2014). Instructional functions of speech and gesture in the L2 classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar

Smotrova, T. & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). The function of gesture in lexically focused L2 instructional conversations. Modern Language Journal, 97(2), 397–416.Google Scholar

Sueyoshi, A. & Hardison, D. M. (2005). The role of gestures and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55(4), 661–699.Google Scholar

Tellier, M. (2006). L’impact du geste pédagogique sur l’enseignement/apprentissage des langues étrangères: Etude sur des enfants de 5 ans [The impact of pedagogic gesture on teaching/learning foreign languages]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Université Paris-Diderot Paris VII, Paris, France.Google Scholar

Tellier, M. (2008). The effect of gestures on second language memorisation by young children. Gesture, 8(2), 219–235.Google Scholar

van Compernolle, R. A. & Smotrova, T. (2014). Corrective feedback, gesture, and mediation in classroom language learning. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 1(1), 25–47.Google Scholar

Wang, W. (2009). The noticing and effect of teacher feedback in ESL classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar

Wang, W. & Loewen, S. (2016). Nonverbal behavior and corrective feedback in nine ESL university-level classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 459–478.Google Scholar

Yuan, C., González-Fuente, S., Baills, F. & Prieto, P. (2019). Observing pitch gestures favors the learning of Spanish intonation by Mandarin speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 5–32.Google Scholar

Zhao, J. (2007). Metaphors and gestures for abstract concepts in academic English writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, AZ.Google Scholar