Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:04:46.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - John J. McCloy and the Landsberg Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2013

Jeffry M. Diefendorf
Affiliation:
University of New Hampshire
Axel Frohn
Affiliation:
German Historical Institute, Washington DC
Hermann-Josef Rupieper
Affiliation:
Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

On January 31, 1951, the U.S. high commissioner for Germany, John J. McCloy, announced his final decisions regarding executive clemency for eighty-nine German war criminals held in Landsberg prison. McCloy affirmed five death sentences out of a total of fifteen, primarily for members of the infamous Einsatzgruppen the SS men who killed thousands of Jews in eastern Europe. The high commissioner also reduced the sentences of seventy-nine inmates. These reductions, coupled with credit for pretrial detention and good conduct, allowed the immediate release of thirty-two of the prisoners. Among them was the industrialist Alfried Krupp, convicted of the abuse of slave labor and plundering in German-occupied countries. McCloy also returned to Krupp his vast industrial holdings, which had been subject to a confiscation order.

McCloy's clemency decisions were the most controversial actions he took as high commissioner. Coming only a few months after the outbreak of the Korean War and the American proposal of German rearmament, McCloy's decisions were blasted by contemporary critics as the height of political expediency, an attempt to win Germany's favor in the increasingly tense Cold War. As one released industrialist put it, “Now that the Americans have Korea on their hands they are a lot more friendly.” Subsequent popular and historical treatments have been equally harsh. William Manchester sharply attacked the release of Krupp in his bestseller, The Arms of Krupp, and the historian Frank Buscher contended that McCloy’s decisions played a major role in the overall “failure” of the war-crimes program to achieve its twin objectives of punishment for the guilty and the democratization of German society.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×