Aad, G.et al. (ATLAS collab.) (2011). Search for contact interactions in dimuon events from pp collisions at TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. D84, 011101.Google Scholar

Aad, G.et al. (ATLAS collab.) (2012). Measurement of W+W− production in pp collisions at TeV with the ATLAS detector and limits on anomalous WWZ and WWy couplings, Phys. Rev. D87 112001.Google Scholar

Aad, G.et al. (ATLAS collab.) (2013 a). Search for a light charged Higgs boson in the decay channel H+ → in events using pp collisions at TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2465.Google Scholar

Aad, G.et al. (ATLAS collab.) (2013 b). Evidence for the spin-0 nature of the Higgs bosonusing ATLAS data (arXiv:1307.1432[hep-ex]).

Aaij, R.et al. (LHCb collab.) (2012). A model-independent Dalitz plot analysis of B± → DK± with decays and constraints on the CKM angle γ, Phys. Lett. B718, 43.Google Scholar

Aaij, R.et al. (LHCb collab.) (2013 a). Observation of oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 101802.Google Scholar

Aaij, R.et al. (LHCb collab.) (2013 b). First evidence for the decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 021801.Google Scholar

Aaij, R.et al. (LHCb collab.) (2013 c). Measurement of mixing parameters and search for CP violation using D0 → K+π− decays (arXiv:1309.6534 [hep-ex]).

Aaij, R.et al. (LHCb collab.) (2013 d). Measurements of indirect CP asymmetries in D0 → K−K+ and D0 → π−π+ decays (arXiv:1310.7201[hep-ex]).

Aaltonen, T.et al. (CDF and D0 collab.) (2013). Higgs boson studies at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D88, 052014.Google Scholar

Abbott, L. (1982). Introduction to the background field method, Acta Phys. Pol. B13, 33.Google Scholar

Abe, K.et al. (SLD collab.) (2000). A high precision measurement of the left-right Z boson cross-section asymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abe, K.et al. (T2K collab.) (2013). Evidenceof electron neutrino appearance in a muon neutrino beam, Phys. Rev. D88, 032002.Google Scholar

Abe, Y.et al. (DOUBLE-CHOOZ collab.) (2012). Indication for the disappearance of reactor electron antineutrinos in the Double Chooz experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 131801.1Google Scholar

Ablikim, M.et al. (BESIII collab.) (2013). Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure in e+e− → π+π−J/ψ at, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abouzaid, E.et al. (KTeV collab.) (2008). Final results from the KTeV experiment on the decay KL → π0γγ, Phys. Rev. D77, 112004.Google Scholar

Ackerman, N.et al. (EXO-200 collab.) (2011). Observation of two-neutrino double-beta decay in 136Xe with EXO-200, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 212501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adam, J.et al. (MEG collab.) (2013). New constraint on the existence of the μ+ → e+γ decay (arXiv:1303.0754[hep-ex]).

Ade, P.A.R.et al. (Planck collab.) (2013). Planck 2013 results. XVI. cosmological parameters (arXiv:1303.5076 [astro-ph.CO]).

Ademollo, M. and Gatto, R. (1964). Nonrenormalization theorem for the strangeness-violating vector currents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adkins, G., Nappi, C., and Witten, E. (1983). Static properties of nucleons in the Skyrme model, Nucl. Phys. B228, 552.Google Scholar

Adler, S.L. (1969). Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177, 2426.Google Scholar

Adler, S.L. (1970). Perturbation theory anomalies, in Lectures on Elementary Particle Physics, ed. S., Deser, M., Grisaru and H., Pendleton (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

Adler, S.L. and Bardeen, W.A. (1969). Absence of higher-order corrections in the anomalous axial-vector divergence equation, Phys. Rev. 182, 1517.Google Scholar

Adler, S.L. and Dashen, R. (1968). Current Algebras and Applications to Particle Physics (Benjamin, New York).

Aguilar, A.et al. (LSND collab.) (2001). Evidence for neutrino oscillations from the observation of anti-neutrino(electron) appearance in a anti-neutrino(muon) beam, Phys. Rev. D64, 112007.Google Scholar

Aharmim, B.et al. (SNO collab.) (2011). Combined analysis of all three phases of solar neutrino data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 150.Google Scholar

Ahn, J.K.et al. (RENO collab.) (2012). Observation of reactor electron antineutrino disappearance in the RENO experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 191802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahrens, J.et al. (2005). Measurement of the π+ meson polarizabilities via the γp → γπ+n reaction, Eur. J. Phys. A23, 113.Google Scholar

Aidala, C.A., Bass, S.D., Hasch, D., and Mallot, G.K. (2013). The spin structure of the nucleon, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akhundov, A.A., Arbuzov, A., Riemann, S., and Riemann, T. (2013). Zfitter 1985-2013 (arXiv:1302.1395 [hep-ph]).

Akhundov, A.A., Bardin, D.Yu., and Reimann, T. (1986). Electroweak one-loop corrections to the decay of the neutral vector boson, Nucl. Phys. B276, 1.Google Scholar

Alarcon, J.M., Camalich, J.M., and Oller, J.A. (2013). Low energy analysis of źN scattering and the pion-nucleon sigma term with covariant baryon chiral perturbation theory (arXiv:1301:3067[hep-ph]).

Alekhin, S., Djouadi, A., and Moch, S. (2012). The top quark and Higgs boson masses and the stability of the electroweak vacuum, Phys. Lett. B716, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ali, A., Hambrock, C., and Wang, W. (2012). Tetraquark interpretation of the charged bottomonium-like states Zb (10610) and Zb (10650) and implications, Phys. Rev. D85, 054011.Google Scholar

Altarelli, G. and Maiani, L. (1974). Octet enhancement of nonleptonic weak interactions in asymptotically free gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B52, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altarelli, G. and Ross, G.G. (1988). The anomalous gluon contribution to polarized leptoproduction, Phys. Lett. B212, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amaldi, U., de Boer, W., and Fürstenau, H. (1991). Comparison of grand unified theories with electroweak and strong coupling constants measured at LEP, Phys. Lett. 260, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amhis, Y.et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collab.) (2012). Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and tau-lepton properties as of early 2012 (arXiv:1207.1158 [hep-ex]).

Amsler, C. and Close, F.E. (1996). Is f0 (1500) a scalar glueball?, Phys. Rev. D53, 295.Google Scholar

An, F.P.et al. (DAYA-BAY collab.) (2012). Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 171803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, P.W. (1984). Basic Notions in Condensed Matter Physics (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA).

Anthony, P.L.et al. (SLAC E158 collab.) (2005). Precision measurement of the weak mixing angle in Moller scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 081601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antipov, Yu.M.et al. (1985). Experimental estimation of the sum of pion electric and magnetic polarizabilities, Z. Phys. C26, 495.Google Scholar

Antognini, A.et al. (2013). Proton Structure from the Measurement of 2S – 2P Transition Frequencies of Muonic Hydrogen, Science 339, 417.Google Scholar

Antonelli, V., Miramonti, L., Pena-Garay, C., and Serenelli, A. (2012). Solar neutrinos (arXiv:1208.1356 [hep-ph]).

Anzai, C., Kiyo, Y., and Sumino, Y. (2010). Static QCD potential at three-loop order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 112003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aoki, K., Hioki, Z., Kawabe, R., Konuma, M., and Muta, T. (1982). Electroweak theory, Suppl. Prog. Theor. Phys. 73, 1.CrossRef

Aoyama, T., Hayakawa, M., Kinoshita, T., and Nio, M. (2012). Quantum electrodynamics calculation of lepton anomalous magnetic moments: numerical approach to the perturbation theory of QED, Prog. Theor. and Exptal. Phys. 2012, 01A107.Google Scholar

Appelquist, T. and Bernard, C. (1981). Nonlinear sigma model in the loop expansion, Phys. Rev. D23, 425.Google Scholar

Appelquist, T. and Carrazone, J. (1975). Infrared singularities and massive fields, Phys. Rev. D11, 2856.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D.S. and McKeown, R.D. (2012). Parity violating electron scattering and the electric and magnetic strange form factors of the nucleon, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asplund, M., Basu, S., Ferguson, J.W., and Serenelli, A. (2009). New solar composition: the problem with solar models revisited, Astrophys. J. 705, L123.Google Scholar

Aydemir, U., Anber, M.M., and Donoghue, J.F. (2012). Self-healing of unitarity in effective field theories and the onset of New Physics, Phys. Rev. D86, 014025.Google Scholar

Baak, M.et al. (Gfitter group) (2012). Updated status of the global electroweak fit and constraints on New Physics, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 2003.Google Scholar

Bahcall, J.N. (1964). Solar neutrinos I. Theoretical, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bahcall, J.N. (1990). Neutrino Astrophysics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

Bailey, J.A., Bernard, C., DeTar, C., et al. (2009). The B → πℓν semileptonic form factor from three-flavor lattice QCD: a model-independent determination of abs[Vub], Phys. Rev. D79, 054507.Google Scholar

Balachandran, A.P., Nair, V.P., Rajeev, S.G., and Stern, A. (1983). Soliton states inthe QCD effective lagrangian, Phys. Rev. D27, 1153.Google Scholar

Balantekin, A.B. and Haxton, W.C. (2013). Neutrino oscillations, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bali, G.S.et al. (1993). A comprehensive lattice study of SU(3) glueballs, Phys. Lett. B309, 378.Google Scholar

Barbieri, R., Frigens, H., Giuliani, F., and Haber, H.E. (1990). Precision measurements in electroweak physics and supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B341, 309.Google Scholar

Barbieri, R., Pomarol, A., Rattazzi, R., and Strumia, A. (2004). Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys. B703, 127.Google Scholar

Bardeen, W.A. (1969). Anomalous Ward identities in spinor field theories, Phys. Rev. 184, 1848.Google Scholar

Bardin, D. and Passarino, G. (1999). The Standard Model in the Making: Precision Study of the Electroweak Interactions (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

Barger, V. and Phillips, R.J.N. (1987). Collider Physics (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, CA).

Bass, S.D. (2005). The spin structure of the proton, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, C.W., Fleming, S., Pirjol, D., and Stewart, I.W. (2001). An effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: heavy to light decays, Phys. Rev. D63, 114020.Google Scholar

Bauer, C.W., Lange, B.O., and Ovanesyan, G. (2011). On Glauber modes in Soft-Collinear Effective Theory, JHEP 1107, 077.Google Scholar

Beane, S.R., Bedaque, P.F., Parreno, A., and Savage, M.J. (2005). Exploring hyperons and hypernuclei with lattice QCD, Nucl. Phys. A747, 55.Google Scholar

Becher, T. (2010). Soft-collinear effective theory - Lectures on ‘The infrared structure of gauge theories’, ETH Zurich. see http://www.becher.itp.unibe.ch/lectures.html.

Becher, T. and Hill, R.J. (2006). Comment on form-factor shape and extraction of abs[Vub] from B → πℓν, Phys. Lett. B633, 61.Google Scholar

Beck, D.H. and Holstein, B.R. (2001). Nucleon structure and parity violating electron scattering, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E10, 1.Google Scholar

Bell, J.S. and Jackiw, R. (1967). A PCAC puzzle: π0 → γγ in the sigma model, Nuovo Cim. 60A, 47.Google Scholar

Bellini, G.et al. (Borexino collab.) (2012 a). First evidence of pepsolar neutrinos by direct detection in Borexino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 051302.Google Scholar

Bellini, G.et al. (Borexino collab.) (2012 b). Absence of day-night asymmetry of 862 keV 7Be solar neutrino rate in Borexino and MSW oscillation parameters, Phys. Lett. B707, 22.

Beneke, M. and Braun, V.M. (1995). Naive non-abelianization and resummation of fermion bubble chains, Phys. Lett. B348, 513.Google Scholar

Beneke, M., Efthymiopoulos, I., et al. (2000). Top quark physics, Geneva 1999, Standard Model physics (and more) at the LHC (CERN, Geneva), p. 419.

Beneke, M. and Smirnov, V.A. (1998). Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold, Nucl. Phys. B522, 321.Google Scholar

Bennett, S.C., Cho, D., Masterson, B.P., Roberts, J.L., Tanner, C.E., Wieman, C.E., and Wood, C.S. (1997). Measurement of parity nonconservation and ananapole moment in cesium, Science 275, 1759.Google Scholar

Bennett, S.C. and Wieman, C.E. (1999). Measurement of the 6S → 7S transition polarizability in atomic cesium and an improved test of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2484 (Errata Bennett, S.C. and Wieman, C.E. (1999). Measurement of the 6S → 7S transition polarizability in atomic cesium and an improved test of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 4153 (1999); 83, 889 (1999)).Google Scholar

Benson, D., Bigi, I.I., Mannel, T., and Uraltsev, N. (2003). Imprecated, yet impeccable: on the theoretical evaluation of Γ(B π Xcℓν), Nucl. Phys. B665, 367.Google Scholar

Bergstrom, L. and Hulth, G. (1985). Induced Higgs couplings to neutral bosons in e+e-collisions, Nucl. Phys. B259, 137 (Erratum Bergstrom, L. and Hulth, G. (1985). Induced Higgs couplings to neutral bosons in e+e-collisions, Nucl. Phys.B276, 744 (1986)).Google Scholar

Berman, S.M. (1958). Radiative corrections to muon and neutron decay, Phys. Rev. 112, 267.Google Scholar

Bernard, C., et al. (2009). The form factor at zero recoil from three-flavor lattice QCD: a model independent determination of arg[Vcb], Phys. Rev. D79, 014506.Google Scholar

Bertlmann (2000). Anomalies in Quantum Field Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

Bethke, S. (2009). The 2009 world average of alpha(s), Eur. Phys. J. C64, 689.Google Scholar

Bethke, S.et al. (2011). Workshop on precision measurements of αs (arXiv:1110.0016 [hep-ph]).

Bhattacharya, T., et al. (2012). Probing novel scalar and tensor interactions from (ultra)cold neutrons to the LHC, Phys. Rev. D85, 054512.Google Scholar

Bigi, I.I., Khoze, V.A., Uraltsev, N.G., and Sanda, A.I. (1989). The question of CP noninvariance as seen through the eyes of neutral beauty, in CP Violation, ed. C., Jarlskog (World Scientific, Singapore).

Bigi, I.I. and Sanda, A.I. (1981). Note on the observability of CP violation in B decays, Nucl. Phys. B193, 85.Google Scholar

Bigi, I.I. and Sanda, A.I. (2000). CP violation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

Bigi, I.I., Shifman, M.A., Uraltsev, N.G., and Vainshtein, A.I. (1993). QCD predictions for lepton spectra in inclusive heavy flavor decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigi, I.I., Shifman, M.A., Uraltsev, N.G., and Vainshtein, A.I. (1994). The pole mass of the heavy quark. Perturbation theory and beyond, Phys. Rev. D50, 2234.Google Scholar

Bigi, I.I. and Uraltsev, N.G. (2001). oscillations as a probe of quark hadron duality, Nucl. Phys. B592, 92.Google Scholar

Bijnens, J. (1990). K14 decays and the low energy expansion, Nucl. Phys. B337, 635.Google Scholar

Bijnens, J., Borg, F., and Dhonte, P. (2003). K π 3π decays in chiral perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B648, 317.Google Scholar

Bijnens, J. and Jemos, I. (2012). A new global fit of the at next-to-next-to-leading order in Chiral Perturbation Theory, Nucl. Phys. B854, 631.Google Scholar

Bijnens, J. and Wise, M.B. (1984). Electromagnetic contribution to ϵ′/ϵ, Phys. Lett. B137, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birrell, N.D. and Davies, P.C.W. (1982). Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

Bjorken, J.D. (1966). Applications of the chiral U(6) × (6) algebra of current densities, Phys. Rev. 148, 1467.Google Scholar

Blum, T.et al. (2011). K to ππ decay amplitudes from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D84, 114503.Google Scholar

Blum, T.et al. (2012). The K π (ππ)1=2 decay amplitude from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 141601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobrowski, M., Lenz, A., Riedl, J., and Rohrwild, J. (2010). How large can the SM contribution to CP violation in mixing be?, JHEP 1003, 009.Google Scholar

Böhm, M., Hollik, W., and Speisberger, H. (1986). On the one-loop renormalization of the electroweak Standard Model, Fort. Phys. 34, 688.Google Scholar

Boito, D.et al. (2012). An updated determination of αs from τ decays, Phys. Rev. D85, 093015.Google Scholar

Bollini, C.G. and Giambiagi, J.J. (1972). Dimensional renormalization: the number of dimensions as a regularizing parameter, Nuovo Cim. 12B, 20.Google Scholar

Borasoy, B. and Holstein, B.R. (1999). Nonleptonic hyperon decays in chiral perturbation theory, Eur. Phys. J. C6, 85.Google Scholar

Braaten, E., Narison, S., and Pich, A. (1992). QCD analysis of the tau hadronic width, Nucl. Phys. B373, 581.Google Scholar

Brambilla, N.et al. (2011). Heavy quarkonium: progress, puzzles, and opportunities, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1534.Google Scholar

Brambilla, N., Pineda, A., Soto, J., and Vairo, A. (2005). Effective field theories for heavy quarkonium, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Branco, G.C., Lavoura, L., and Silva, J.P. (1999). CP Violation (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

Brod, J. and Gorbahn, M. (2012). Next-to-next-to-leading-order charm-quark contribution to the CP violation parameter ϵK and ΔMK, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 121801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brod, J., Gorbahn, M., and Stamou, E. (2011). Two-loop electroweak corrections for the decays, Phys. Rev. D83, 034030.Google Scholar

Brodsky, S.J. and Lepage, G.P. (1980). Exclusive processes in perturbative quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D22, 2157.Google Scholar

Buchalla, G., Buras, A.J. and Harlander, M.K. (1990). The anatomy of ϵ′/ϵ in the Standard Model, Nucl. Phys. B337, 313.Google Scholar

Buchalla, G., Buras, A.J. and Lautenbacher, M.E. (1996). Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchmüller, W. and Wyler, D. (1986). Effective lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621.Google Scholar

Buras, A.J., Girrbach, J., Guadagnoli, D., and Isidori, G. (2012). On the Standard Model prediction for BR(Bs,d → μ + μ−), Eur. Phys. J. C72, 2172.Google Scholar

Burgers, G. and Jegerlehner, F. (1989). Δr, or the relation between the electroweak couplings and the weak vector boson masses, in Z Physics at LEP 1, ed. Altarelli, G., Kleiss, R., and Verzegnassi, C. (CERN 89-08, Geneva).

Burgess, C.P., Godfrey, S., Konig, H., London, D., and Maksymyk, I. (1994). A global fit to extended oblique parameters, Phys. Lett. B326, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cabibbo, N. (1963). Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cabibbo, N., Swallow, E.C., and Winston, R. (2003). Semileptonic hyperon decays, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 53, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cahn, R.N., Chanowitz, M.S., and Fleishon, N. (1979). Higgs particle production by Z π Hγ, Phys. Lett. B82, 113.Google Scholar

Callen, C.G., Coleman, S., Wess, J., and Zumino, B. (1969). Structure of phenomenological lagrangians II, Phys. Rev. 177, 2247.Google Scholar

Caprini, I., Colangelo, G., and Leutwyler, H. (2006). Mass and width of the lowest resonance in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 132001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caprini, I., Lellouch, L., and Neubert, M. (1998). Dispersive bounds on the shape of form-factors, Nucl. Phys. B530, 153.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. (1966). Introduction to Unitary Symmetry (Wiley Interscience, New York).

Casas, J.A., Di Clemente, V., Ibarra, A., and Quiros, M. (2000). Massive neutrinos and the Higgs mass window, Phys. Rev D62, 053005.Google Scholar

Caswell, W.E. and Lepage, G.P. (1986). Effective lagrangian for bound state problems in QED, QCD and other field theories, Phys. Lett. B167, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chanowitz, M.S. and Ellis, J. (1972). Canonical anomalies and broken scale invariance, Phys. Lett. 40B, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chanowitz, M.S., Furman, M.A., and Hinchliffe, I. (1978). Weak interactions of ultraheavy termions, Phys. Lett. B78, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chatrchyan, S.et al. (CMS collab.) (2013). On the mass and spin-parity of the Higgs boson candidate via its decays to Zboson pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 081803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chay, J., Georgi, H., and Grinstein, B. (1990). Lepton energy distributions in heavy meson decays from QCD, Phys. Lett. B247, 399.Google Scholar

Chen, Y.et al. (2006). Glueball spectrum and matrix elements on anisotropic lattices, Phys. Rev. D73, 014516.Google Scholar

Cheng, T.-P. and Dashen, R. (1971). Is SU(2) × SU(22) a better symmetry than SU(3)?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheng, T.-P. and Li, L.-F. (1984). Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

Chetyrkin, K.G. (1997). Quark mass anomalous dimension to O, Phys. Lett. 404, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chetyrkin, K.G., Harlander, R., Seidensticker, T. and Steinhauser, M. (1999). Second order QCD corrections to Γ(t → Wb), Phys. Rev. D60, 114015.Google Scholar

Chetyrkin, K.G., Kniehl, B.A. and Steinhauser, M. (1998). Decoupling relations to and their connection to low-energy theorems, Nucl. Phys. B510, 6.Google Scholar

Chodos, A., Jaffe, R.L., Johnson, K., Thorn, C.B., and Weisskopf, V.F. (1974). New extended model of hadrons, Phys. Rev. D9, 3471.Google Scholar

Cirigliano, V., Donoghue, J.F., and Golowich, E. (2000). Dimension eight operators in the weak OPE, JHEP 0010, 048.Google Scholar

Cirigliano, V., Donoghue, J.F., Golowich, E., and Maltman, K. (2001). Determination of 〈(ππ)1=2/Q(7, 8)/K0〉 in the chiral limit, Phys. Lett. B522, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cirigliano, V., Ecker, G., Neufeld, A., Pich, A., and Portoles, J. (2012). Kaon decays in the Standard Model, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cirigliano, V., Golowich, E., and Maltman, K. (2003). QCD condensates for the light quark V–A correlator, Phys. Rev. D68, 054013.Google Scholar

Cirigliano, V. and Rosell, I. (2007). Two-loop effective theory analysis of branching ratios, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 231801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ciuchini, M., Franco, E.Martinelli, G., Reina, L., and Silvestrini, L. (1995). An upgraded analysis of epsilon-prime epsilon at the next-to-leading order, Z. Phys. C68, 239.Google Scholar

Cohen, A.G., Glashow, S.L., and Ligeti, Z. (2009). Disentangling neutrino oscillations, Phys. Lett. B678, 191.Google Scholar

Colangelo, G., Gasser, J., and Leutwyler, H. (2001). ππ scattering, Nucl. Phys. B603, 125.Google Scholar

Colangelo, P. and Khodjamirian, A. (2000). QCD sum rules, a modern perspective, in At the Frontier of Particle Physics, ed. Shifman, M. (World Scientific, Singapore).

Coleman, S. (1985). Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

Coleman, S. and Glashow, S.L. (1964). Departures from the eightfold way, Phys. Rev. B134, 671.Google Scholar

Coleman, S. and Mandula, J. (1967). All possible symmetries of the S-matrix, Phys. Rev. 159, 1251.Google Scholar

Coleman, S., Wess, J., and Zumino, B. (1969). Structure of phenomenological lagrangians I, Phys. Rev. 177, 2239.Google Scholar

Coleman, S. and Witten, E. (1980). Chiral symmetry breakdown in large-Nc chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, J., Duncan, A., and Joglekar, S. (1977). Trace and dilation anomalies in gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D16, 438.Google Scholar

Collins, J., Wilczek, F., and Zee, A. (1978). Low energy manifestations of heavy particles: application to the neutral current, Phys. Rev. D18, 242.Google Scholar

Collins, J.C. (2011). Foundations of Perturbative QCD (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

Crewther, R. (1972). Nonperturbative evaluation of the anomalies in low energy theorems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crewther, R. (1978). Effects of topological charge in gauge theory, Acta Phys. Austriaca (Proc. Suppl.) 19, 47.Google Scholar

Cronin, J.A. (1967). Phenomenological model of strong and weak interactions in chiral U(3), Phys. Rev. 161, 1483.Google Scholar

Czarnecki, A. and Marciano, W.J. (1996). Electroweak radiative corrections to polarized Moller scattering asymmetries, Phys. Rev. D53, 1066.Google Scholar

Czarnecki, A. and Marciano, W.J. (2007). Electroweak radiative corrections to muon capture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 032003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czarnecki, A. and Melnikov, K. (1997). Two loop QCD corrections to b π c transitions at zero recoil: analytical results, Nucl. Phys. B505, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czarnecki, A. and Melnikov, K. (1999). Two loop QCD corrections to top quark width, Nucl. Phys. B544, 520.Google Scholar

Dalgic, E., Gray, A., Wingate, M., Davies, C.T.H., Lepage, G.P., and Shigemitsu, J. (2006). B meson semileptonic form-factors from unquenched lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D73, 074502.Google Scholar

D'Ambrosio, G. and Espriu, D. (1986). Rare decay modes of the K meson in the chiral lagrangian, Phys. Lett. B175, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Das, T.et al. (1967). Electromagnetic mass difference of pions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dashen, R.F. (1969). Chiral SU(3) × SU(3) as a symmetry of the strong interactions, Phys. Rev. 183, 1245.Google Scholar

Dashen, R.F., Jenkins, E.E., and Manohar, A.V. (1994). The 1/N(c) expansion for baryons, Phys. Rev. D49, 4713 (Erratum Dashen, R.F., Jenkins, E.E., and Manohar, A.V. (1994). The 1/N(c) expansion for baryons, Phys. Rev.D51, 2489 (1995).Google Scholar

Davier, M., Hoecker, A., Malaescu, B., and Zhang, Z. (2011). Reevaluation of the hadronic contributions to the muon g-2 and to alpha(MZ), Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1515 (Erratum Davier, M., Hoecker, A., Malaescu, B., and Zhang, Z. (2011). Reevaluation of the hadronic contributions to the muon g-2 and to alpha(MZ), Eur. Phys. J.C72, 1874 (2012)).Google Scholar

Davis, R. (1964). Solar neutrinos. II: experimental, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Bruyn, K., Fleischer, R., Knegjens, R., Koppenburg, P., Merk, M., Pellegrino, A., and Tuning, N. (2012). Probing New Physics via the effective lifetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 041801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeGrand, T. and Detar, C.E. (2010). Lattice Methods for Quantum Chromodynamics (World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ).

DeGrand, T., Jaffe, R.L., Johnson, K., and Kiskis, J. (1975). Masses and other parameters of light hadrons, Phys. Rev. D12, 2060.Google Scholar

Degrassi, G., Di Vita, S., Elias-Mir, J., Espinosa, J.R., Giudice, G., Isidori, G., and Strumia, A. (2012). Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO, JHEP 1208, 098.Google Scholar

Dehnadi, B., Hoang, A.H., Mateu, V., and Zebarjad, S.M. (2011). Charmmass determination from QCD charmonium sum rules at order (arXiv:1102.2264 [hep-ph]).

Denner, A., Nierste, U., and Scharf, R. (1991). A compact expression for the scalar one loop four point function, Nucl. Phys. B367, 637.Google Scholar

de Putter, R., et al. (2012). New neutrino mass bounds from Sloan Digital Sky Survey III data release 8 photometric luminous galaxies, Astrophys. J 761, 12.Google Scholar

De Roeck (2013). Higgs physics at CMS (plenary talk delivered on 6/24/13 at at 26th Intl. Symp. on Lept. Phot. Ints. at High Energies).

De Rujula, A., Georgi, H., and Glashow, S.L. (1975). Hadron masses in a gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D12, 147.Google Scholar

De Rujula, A., Lusignoli, M., Maiani, L., Petcov, S., and Petronzio, R. (1980). A fresh look at neutrino oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B168, 54.Google Scholar

Descotes-Genon, S., Hurth, T., Matias, J., and Virto, J. (2013). B → K*ℓℓ: The New Frontier of New Physics searches in flavor (arXiv:1305.4808 [hep-ph]).

DeWitt, B. (1967). Quantum theory of gravity: II, III, Phys. Rev. 162, 1195, 1239.Google Scholar

DiVecchia, P. and Veneziano, G. (1980). Chiral dynamics in the large Nc limit, Nucl. Phys. B171, 253.Google Scholar

Djouadi, A. (2008). The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. I: the Higgs boson in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 457, 1.Google Scholar

Djoudi, A., Kühn, J.H., and Zerwas, P.M. (1990). b-jet asymmetries in Z decays, Zeit. Phys. C46, 411.Google Scholar

Dobado, A. and Pelaez, J.R. (1997). The inverse amplitude method in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D56, 3057.Google Scholar

Donoghue, J.F. (1994). General relativity as an effective field theory: the leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D50, 3874.Google Scholar

Donoghue, J.F., Golowich, E., and Holstein, B.R. (1986 a). Dispersive effects in D0 anti-D0 Mixing, Phys. Rev. D33, 179.Google Scholar

Donoghue, J.F., Golowich, E., and Holstein, B.R. (1986 b). Low-energy weak interactions of quarks, Phys. Rep. 131, 319.Google Scholar

Donoghue, J.F., He, X.G., and Pakvasa, S. (1986). Hyperon decays and CP nonconservation, Phys. Rev. D34, 833.Google Scholar

Donoghue, J.F. and Holstein, B.R. (1989). Pion transitions and models of chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. D40, 2378.Google Scholar

Donoghue, J.F. and Johnson, K. (1980). The pion and an improved static bag, Phys. Rev. D21, 1975.Google Scholar

Donoghue, J.F. and Li, L.F. (1979). Properties of charged Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D19, 945.Google Scholar

Donoghue, J.F. and Nappi, C. (1986). The quark content of the proton, Phys. Lett. B168, 105.Google Scholar

Donoghue, J.F., Ramirez, C., and Valencia, G. (1989). Spectrum of QCD and chiral lagrangians of the strong and weak interaction, Phys. Rev. D39, 1947.Google Scholar

Dubnicka, S.et al. (2010). Quark model description of the tetraquark state X(3872) in a relativistic constituent quark model with infrared confinement, Phys. Rev. D81, 114007.Google Scholar

Dzuba, V.A., Berengut, J.C., Flambaum, V.V., and Roberts, B. (2012). Revisiting parity non-conservation in cesium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eberhardt, O., Herbert, G., Lacker, H., Lenz, A., Menzel, A., Nierste, U., and Wiebusch, M. (2012). Impact of a Higgs boson at a mass of 126 GeV on the Standard Model with three and four fermion generations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 241802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ecker, G., Gasser, J., Pich, A., and de Rafael, E. (1989). The role of resonances in chiral perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B321, 311.Google Scholar

Ecker, G., Pich, A., and de Rafael, E. (1988). Radiative kaon decays and CP violation in chiral perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B303, 665.Google Scholar

Eichten, E. (1988). Heavy quarks on the lattice, Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) 4, 170.Google Scholar

Eichten, E., Gottfried, K., Kinoshita, T., Lane, K.D. and Yan, T.-M. (1980). Charmonium: comparison with experiment, Phys. Rev. D21, 203.Google Scholar

Eichten, E. and Hill, B. (1990). Static effective field theory: 1/m Corrections, Phys. Lett. B243, 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar

El-Khadra, A.X. and Luke, M. (2002). The mass of the b quark, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 52, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, J.R., Gabathuler, E., and Karliner, M. (1989). The OZI rule does not apply to baryons, Phys. Lett. B217, 173.Google Scholar

Ellis, J.R., Gaillard, M.K., and Nanopoulos, D.V. (1976). A phenomenological profile of the Higgs Boson, Nucl. Phys. B106, 292.Google Scholar

Ellis, J.R. and You, T. (2012). Global analysis of the Higgs candidate with mass 125 GeV, JHEP 1209, 123.Google Scholar

Ellis, R.K., Stirling, W.J., and Webber, B.R. (2003). QCD and Collider Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

Ellis, R.K. and Zanderighi, G. (2008). Scalarone-loopintegrals for QCD, JHEP 0802, 002.Google Scholar

Engel, J., Ramsey-Musolf, M.J., and van Kolck, U. (2013). Electric dipole moments of nucleons, nuclei, and atoms: the Standard Model and beyond, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epelbaum, E. and Meißner, U.G. (2012). Chiral dynamics of few- and many-nucleon systems, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erler, J. (2000). Global fits to electroweak data using GAPP (arXiv:0005084 [hep-ph]).

Erler, J. and Ramsey-Musolf, M.J. (2005). The weak mixing angle at low energies, Phys. Rev. D72, 073003.Google Scholar

Erler, J. and Su, S. (2013). The weak neutral current, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 71, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espinosa, J.R., Grojean, J., Muhlleitner, M., and Trott, M. (2012). First glimpses at Higgs' face, JHEP 1212, 045.Google Scholar

Faddeev, L.D. and Popov, V.N. (1967). Feynman diagrams for the Yang–Mills field, Phys. Lett. 25B, 29.Google Scholar

Falk, A.F., Grossman, Y., Ligeti, Z., and Petrov, A.A. (2002). SU(3) breaking and D0–anti-D0 mixing, Phys. Rev. D65, 054034.Google Scholar

Ferroglia, A. and Sirlin, A. (2012). Radiative corrections in precision electroweak physics: a historical perspective, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1.Google Scholar

Fleischer, J., Jegerlehner, F., Tarasov, O.V., and Veretin, O.L. (1999). Two loop QCD corrections of the massive fermion propagator, Nucl. Phys. B539, 671 (Erratum Fleischer, J., Jegerlehner, F., Tarasov, O.V., and Veretin, O.L. (1999). Two loop QCD corrections of the massive fermion propagator, Nucl. Phys.B571 (2000) 511).Google Scholar

Fogli, G.L., Lisi, E., Marrone, A., Montanino, D., Palazzo, A., and Rotunno, A.M. (2012). Global analysis of neutrino masses, mixings and phases: entering the era of leptonic CP violation searches, Phys. Rev. D86, 013012.Google Scholar

Forero, D.V., Tortola, M., and Valle, J.W.F. (2012). Global status of neutrino oscillation parameters after Neutrino-2012, Phys. Rev. D86, 073012.Google Scholar

Forkel, H. (2005). Direct instantons, topological charge screening, and QCD glueball sum rules, Phys. Rev. D71, 054008.Google Scholar

Friedrich, J. (2012). Studies in pion dynamics at COMPASS, Proceedings of Science (CONFINEMENT) X, 120.Google Scholar

Fritzsch, H. and Gell-Mann, M. (1972). Current algebra: quarks and what else?, in Proc. XVI Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics, ed. J.D., Jackson and A., Roberts (National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL.).

Fujikawa, K. (1979). Path integral measure for gauge invariant field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fujikawa, K. (1981). Energy momentum tensor in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D23, 2262.Google Scholar

Fujikawa, K. and Suzuki, H. (2004). Path Integrals and Quantum Anomalies (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

Gambino, P., Mannel, T., and Uraltsev, N. (2012). B → D* zero-recoil formfactor and the Heavy Quark Expansion in QCD: a systematic study, JHEP 1210, 169.Google Scholar

Gambino, P. and Sirlin, A. (1994). Relation between and, Phys. Rev. D49, 1160.Google Scholar

Gando, A.et al. (KamLAND collab.) (2011). Constraints on θ13 from a three-flavor oscillation analysis of reactor antineutrinos at KamLAND, Phys. Rev. C83, 052002.Google Scholar

Gando, A.et al. (KamLAND-Zen collab.) (2012). Measurement of the double-β decay half-life of 136Xe with the KamLAND-Zen experiment, Phys. Rev. C85, 045504.Google Scholar

Gaillard, M.K. and Lee, B.W. (1974). ΔI = 1/2 rule for nonleptonic decays in asymptotically free gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gasser, J. (1987). Chiral perturbation theory and effective lagrangians, Nucl. Phys. B279, 65.Google Scholar

Gasser, J. and Leutwyler, H. (1984). Chiral perturbation theory to one loop, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 158, 142.Google Scholar

Gasser, J. and Leutwyler, H. (1985a). Chiral perturbation theory: expansions in the mass of the strange quark, Nucl. Phys. B250, 465.Google Scholar

Gasser, J. and Leutwyler, H. (1985b). Low energy expansion of meson form factors, Nucl. Phys. B250, 517.Google Scholar

Gasser, J., Leutwyler, H., and Sainio, M.E. (1991). Sigma term update, Phys. Lett. B253, 252.Google Scholar

Gasser, J., Sainio, M.E., and Svarc, A. (1988). Nucleons with chiral loops, Nucl. Phys. B307, 779.Google Scholar

Gattringer, C. and Lang, C.B. (2010). Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice (Springer [Lect. Notes Phys. 788], Berlin).

Gavela, M.B., Hernandez, P., Orloff, J., and Pene, O. (1994). Standard Model CP violation and baryon asymmetry, Mod. Phys. Lett. A9, 795.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1961). The Eightfold Way: a theory of strong interaction symmetry (CalTech Rept. CTSL-20).

Gell-Mann, M. and Levy, M. (1960). The axial vector current in beta decay, Nuovo Cim. 16, 705.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. and Low, F.E. (1954). Quantum electrodynamics at small distances, Phys. Rev. 95, 1300.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M., Oakes, R. and Renner, B. (1968). Behavior of current divergences under SU(3) × SU(3), Phys. Rev. 175, 2195.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M., Ramond, P., and Slansky, R. (1979). Complex spinors and unified theories, A.I.P. Conf. Proc. C790927, 315.Google Scholar

Georgi, H. (1984). Weak Interactions and Modern Particle Theory (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA).

Georgi, H. (1990). An effective field theory for heavy quarks at low-energies, Phys. Lett. B240, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgi, H. (1992). D–anti-D mixing in heavy quark effective field theory, Phys. Lett. B297, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgi, H. and Glashow, S.L. (1974). Unity of all elementary particle forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgi, H., Grinstein, B. and Wise, M.B. (1990). Λb semileptonic form factors for mc ≠ ∞, Phys. Lett. B252, 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgi, H., Quinn, H.R., and Weinberg, S. (1974). Hierarchy of interactions in unified gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerstein, I., Jackiw, R., Lee, B.W., and Weinberg, S. (1971). Chiral loops, Phys. Rev. D3, 2486.Google Scholar

Gilkey, P. (1975). The spectral geometry of a Riemannian manifold, J. Diff. Geom. 10, 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilman, F.J. and Wise, M.B. (1979). The ΔI = 1/2 rule and violation of CP in the six-quark model, Phys. Lett. B83, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giri, A., Grossman, Y., Soffer, A., and Zupan, J. (2003). Determining γ using B± → DK± with multibody D decays, Phys. Rev. D68, 054018.Google Scholar

Giunti, C. and Kim, C.W. (2007). Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

Glashow, S.L. (1961). Partial symmetries of weak interactions, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579.Google Scholar

Goity, J.L. (1986). The decays and in the chiral approach, Zeit. Phys. C34, 341.Google Scholar

Goity, J.L., Bernstein, A.M., and Holstein, B.R. (2002). The decay π0 ⤒ γγ to next to leading order in chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D66, 076014.Google Scholar

Goldberger, M. and Treiman, S.B. (1958). Conserved currents in the theory of the Fermi interaction, Phys. Rev. 110, 1478.Google Scholar

Goldberger, W.D. and Rothstein, I.Z. (2006). An effective field theory of gravity for extended objects, Phys. Rev. D73, 104029.Google Scholar

Goldstone, J. (1961). Field theories with superconductor solutions, Nuovo Cim. 19, 154.Google Scholar

Goldstone, J., Salam, A., and Weinberg, S. (1962). Broken symmetries, Phys. Rev. 127, 965.Google Scholar

Golowich, E., Haqq, E., and Karl, G. (1983). Are there baryons which contain constituent gluons?, Phys. Rev. D28, 160.Google Scholar

Golowich, E., Hewett, J., Pakvasa, S., and Petrov, A.A. (2007). Implications of mixing for New Physics, Phys. Rev. D76, 095009.Google Scholar

Golowich, E. and Holstein, B.R. (1975). Restrictions on the structure of the ΔS = 1 nonleptonic Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golowich, E. and Yang, T.C. (1979). Charged Higgs bosons and decays of heavy flavored mesons, Phys. Lett. B80, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gonzalez-Garcia, M.C., Maltoni, M., Salvado, J., and Schwetz, T. (2012). Global fit to three neutrino mixing: critical lookat present precision, JHEP 1212, 123.Google Scholar

Grevesse, N. and Sauval, A.I. (1998). Standard solar composition, Space Sci. Rev. 85, 161.Google Scholar

Gronau, M. (2000). U spin symmetry in charmless B decays, Phys. Lett. B492, 297.Google Scholar

Gronau, M. and London, D. (1990). Isospin analysis of CP asymmetries in B decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gronau, M. and Wyler, D. (1991). On determining a weak phase from CP asymmetries in charged B decays, Phys. Lett. B265, 172.Google Scholar

Gross, D.J. and Wilczek, F. (1973a). Ultraviolet behavior of nonabelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1343.Google Scholar

Gross, D.J. and Wilczek, F. (1973b). Asymptotically free gauge theories I, Phys. Rev. D8, 3633.Google Scholar

Grozin, A.G. (2004). Heavy Quark Effective Theory (Springer, NewYork).

Guberina, B., Peccei, R.D., and Rückl, R. (1980). Dimensional regularization techniques and their uses in calculating infrared safe weak decay processes, Nucl. Phys. B171, 333.Google Scholar

Gunion, J.F., Haber, H.E., Kane, G.L., and Dawson, S. (1990). The Higgs Hunters Guide (Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA).

Haag, R. (1958). Quantum field theories with composite particles and asymptotic conditions, Phys. Rev. 112, 669.Google Scholar

Haber, H.E. and O'Neil, E. (2011). Basis-independent methods for the two-Higgs-doublet model III: the CP-conserving limit, custodial symmetry, and the oblique parameters S, T, U, Phys. Rev. D83, 055017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagelin, J.S. and Littenberg, L. (1989). Rare kaon decays, Prog Part Nucl Phys. 23, 1.Google Scholar

Hardy, J.C. and Towner, I.S. (2009). Superallowed 0+ → 0+ nuclear beta decays: a new survey with precision test of the conserved vector current. hypothesis and the standard model, Phys. Rev. C79, 055502.Google Scholar

Hardy, J.C. and Towner, I.S. (2010). The evaluation of Vud and its impact on the unitarity of the Cabibbo–Kobayashi–Maskawa quark-mixing matrix, Rpt. Prog. Phys. 73, 046301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harnett, D.et al. (2011). Near maximal mixing of scalar gluonium and quark mesons: a Gaussian sum rule analysis, Nucl. Phys. A850, 110.Google Scholar

Harrison, P.F., Perkins, D.H., and Scott, W.G., (2002). Tri-bimaximal mixing and the neutrino oscillation data, Phys. Lett B530, 167.Google Scholar

Hart, A.et al. (2006). A lattice study of the masses of singlet 0++ mesons, Phys. Rev. D74, 114504.Google Scholar

Hart, A. and Teper, M. (2002). Glueball spectrum in O(a) improved lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D65, 034502.Google Scholar

Haxton, W.C., Robertson, R.G.H., and Serenelli, A.M. (2012). Solarneutrinos: status and prospects (arXiv:1208.5723 [astro-phSR]).

He, X.G. (1999). SU(3) analysis of annihilation contributions and CP violating relations in B → PP decays, Eur. Phys. J. C9, 443.Google Scholar

Heinemeyer, S.et al. (The LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collab.) (2013). Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 3. Higgs properties (arXiv:1307.1347 [hep-ph]).

Hinshaw, G.et al. (WMAP collab.) (2013). Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological parameter results (arXiv:1212.5226v2 [astro-ph.CO]).

Hoang, A.H., Ligeti, Z., and Manohar, A.V. (1999). B decays in the upsilon expansion, Phys. Rev. D59, 074017.Google Scholar

Hoang, A.H., Smith, M.C., Stelzer, T., and Willenbrock, S. (1998). Quarkonia and the pole mass, Phys. Rev. D59, 114014.Google Scholar

Hoang, A.H. and Stewart, I.W. (2003). Ultrasoft renormalization in nonrelativistic QCD, Phys. Rev. D67, 114020.Google Scholar

Hoang, A.H. and Teubner, T. (1999). Top quark pair production close to threshold: top mass, width and momentum distribution, Phys. Rev. D60, 114027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Höhler, G. (1983). Pion–nucleon scattering, in Landolt Börnstein New Series 1-9b2, ed. H., Schopper (Springer, Berlin).

Hollik, W.F.L. (1990). Radiative corrections in the Standard Model, Fort. Phys. 38, 165.Google Scholar

Holstein, B.R. (1989). Weak Interactions in Nuclei (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).

Hughes, R.J. (1981). More comments on asymptotic freedom, Nucl. Phys. B186, 376.Google Scholar

Iizuka, J. (1966). A systematics and phenomenology of meson family, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 37–38, 21.Google Scholar

Inami, T. and Lim, C.S. (1981). Effects of superheavy quarks and leptons on low energy weak processes and, Prog. Theor. Phys. 65, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ioffe, B.L. (1981). Calculation of baryon masses in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B188, 317.Google Scholar

Ioffe, B.L., Fadin, V.S., and Lipatov, L.N. (2010). Quantum Chromodynamics: Perturbative and Nonperturbative Aspects (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

Ioffe, B.L. and Shifman, M.A. (1980). The decay ψ′ → J/ψ + π0(η) and quark masses, Phys. Lett. 95B, 99.Google Scholar

Isgur, N. and Karl, G. (1978). P-wave baryons in the quark model, Phys. Rev. D18, 4187.Google Scholar

Isgur, N. and Wise, M.B. (1989). Weak decays of heavy mesons in the staticquark approximation, Phys. Lett. B232, 113.Google Scholar

Isgur, N. and Wise, M.B. (1990). Weak transitionform factors between heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. 237, 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Itzykson, C. and Zuber, J.-B. (1980). Quantum Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).

Jackiw, R. and Rebbi, C. (1976). Vacuum periodicity in a Yang–Mills quantum theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, K. (2013). Higgs physics at ATLAS (plenary talk delivered on 6/24/13 at at 26th Intl. Symp. on Lept. Phot. Ints. at High Energies).

Jaffe, R.L. (1977). Perhaps a stable dibaryon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaffe, R.L., Johnson, K., and Ryzak, Z. (1986). Qualitative features of the glueball spectrum, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 168, 334.Google Scholar

Jaffe, R.L. and Manohar, A. (1990). The g1 problem: deep inelastic electron scattering and the spin of the proton, Nucl. Phys. B337, 509.Google Scholar

Jarlskog, C. (1985). Commutators of the quark mass matrices in the standard electroweak model and a measure of maximal CP violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jarlskog, C. (1989). Introduction to CP violation, in CP Violation, ed. C., Jarlskog (World Scientific, Singapore).

Jenkins, E.E. (1998). Large N(c) baryons, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 48, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ji, X.-D. (1994). Chiral odd and spin dependent quark fragmentation functions and their applications, Phys. Rev. D49, 114.Google Scholar

Ji, X.-D., Tang, J., and Hoodbhoy, P. (1996). Spin structure of the nucleon in the asymptotic limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, K. (1978). A field theory lagrangian for the MIT bag model, Phys. Lett. 78B, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, K. and Thorn, C.B. (1976). Stringlike solutions of the bag model, Phys. Rev. D13, 1934.Google Scholar

Kambor, J. and Holstein, B.R. (1994). KS → γγ, KL → π0γγ and unitarity, Phys. Rev. D49, 2346.Google Scholar

Kambor, J., Missimer, J., and Wyler, D. (1990). The chiral loop expansion of the nonleptonic weak interactions of mesons, Nucl. Phys. B346, 17.Google Scholar

Kaymakcalan, Ö., Rajeev, S., and Schecter, J. (1984). Nonabelian anomaly and vector meson decays, Phys. Rev. D30, 594.Google Scholar

Kayser, B., Kopp, J., Roberston, R.G.H., and Vogel, P. (2010). On a theory of neutrino oscillations with entanglement, Phys. Rev. D82, 093003.Google Scholar

Keung, W.Y. and Marciano, W.J. (1984). Higgs scalar decays: H → W + X, Phys. Rev. D30, 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, S.F. and Luhn, C. (2013). Neutrino mass and mixing with discrete symmetry, Rept. Prog. Phys. 76, 056201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinoshita, T. and Sirlin, A. (1959). Radiative corrections to Fermi interactions, Phys. Rev. 113, 1652.Google Scholar

Klinkhamer, F.R. and Manton, N.S. (1984). A saddle point solution in the Weinberg–Salam theory, Phys. Rev. D30, 2212.Google Scholar

Kobayashi, M. and Maskawa, T. (1973). CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interactions, Prog. Theo. Phys. 49, 652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kühn, J.H., Steinhauser, M., and Sturm, C. (2007). Heavy quark masses from sum rules in four-loop approximation, Nucl. Phys. B778, 192.Google Scholar

Kumar, K.S., Mantry, S., Marciano, W.J., and Souder, P.A. (2013). Lowenergy measurements of the weak mixing angle (arXiv:1302.6263 [hep-ex]).

Kuzmin, V.A., Rubakov, V.A. and Shaposhnikov, M.E. (1985). On the anomalous electroweak baryon number nonconservation in the early universe, Phys. Lett. B155, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kwong, W., Quigg, C., and Rosner, J.L. (1987). Heavy–quark systems, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 37, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laiho, J., Lunghi, E., and Van de Water, R.S. (2010). Lattice QCD inputs to the CKM unitarity triangle analysis, Phys. Rev. D81, 034503.Google Scholar

Langacker, P. (1981). Grand unified theories and proton decay, Phys. Rep. C72, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langacker, P. (2010). The Standard Model and Beyond (Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL).

Lee, B.W., Quigg, C., and Thacker, H.B. (1977). Weak interactions at very high energies: the role of the Higgs-boson mass, Phys. Rev. D16, 1519.Google Scholar

Lee, B.W. and Swift, A.R. (1964). Dynamical basis of the sum rule, Phys. Rev. B136, 228.Google Scholar

Lee, T.D. (1973). A theory of spontaneous T violation, Phys. Rev. D8, 1226.Google Scholar

Lee, T.D. (1982). Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory (Harwood, New York).

Lehmann, H. (1972). Chiral invariance and effective range expansion for pion pion scattering, Phys. Lett. B41, 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibrandt, G. (1975). Introduction to the technique of dimensional regularization, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenz, A. and Nierste, U. (2007). Theoretical update of mixing, JHEP 0706, 072.Google Scholar

Lenz, A. and Nierste, U. (2011). Numerical updates of lifetimes and mixing parameters of B mesons, (arXiv:1102.4274[hep-ph]).

Lepage, G.P. (1998). Perturbative improvement for lattice QCD: an update, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 60A, 267.Google Scholar

Lepage, G.P. and Thacker, B.A. (1988). Effective lagrangians for simulation of heavy quarksystems, Nucl. Phys.(Proc.Suppl.) 4, 199.Google Scholar

Leutwyler, H. and Roos, M. (1984). Determination of the elements Vus and Vud of the Kobayashi–Maskawa matrix, Z. Phys. C25, 91.Google Scholar

Le Yaouanc, A., Oliver, L., Pène, O., and Raynal, J.-C. (1985). Quark model of light mesons with dynamically broken chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. D31, 137.Google Scholar

Le Yaouanc, A., Oliver, L., Pène, O., and Raynal, J.-C. (1988). Hadron Transitions in the Quark Model (Gordon and Breach, New York).

Lipkin, H.J. (1984). The theoretical basis and phenomenology of the OZI rule, Nucl. Phys. B244, 147.Google Scholar

Lipkin, H.J. (2005). Is observed direct CP violation in Bd → K+π− due to New Physics? Check Standard Model prediction of equal violation in Bs → K−π+, Phys. Lett. B621, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Z.Q.et al. (Belle collab.) (2013). Study of e+e− → π+π− → J/ψ and observation of a charged charmonium-like state at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lucha, W., Melikhov, D., and Simula, S. (2011). OPE, charm-quark mass, and decay constants of D and Ds mesons from QCD sum rules, Phys. Lett. B701, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luke, M. (1990). Effects of subleading operators in the heavy quark effective theory, Phys. Lett. B252, 447.Google Scholar

Ma, E. and Maniatis, M. (2010). Symbiotic symmetries of the two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Lett. B683, 33.Google Scholar

Maki, Z., Nakagawa, M., and Sakata, S. (1962). Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mangano, G., Miele, G., Pastor, S., Pinto, T., Pisanti, O., and Serpico, T. (2005). Relic neutrino decoupling including flavor oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B729, 221.Google Scholar

Mannel, T. (1994). Operator product expansion for inclusive semileptonic decays in heavy quark effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B413, 396.Google Scholar

Mannel, T. (2004). Effective Field Theories in Flavour Physics (Springer, New York).

Manohar, A.V. and Mateu, V. (2008). Dispersion relation bounds for ππ scattering, Phys. Rev. D77, 094019.Google Scholar

Manohar, A.V. and Stewart, I.W. (2007). The zero-bin and mode factorization in quantum field theory, Phys. Rev. D76, 074002.Google Scholar

Manohar, A.V. and Wise, M.B. (1994). Inclusive semileptonic B and polarized Λb decays from QCD, Phys. Rev. D49, 1310.Google Scholar

Manohar, A. and Wise, M.B. (2007). Heavy Quark Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

Marciano, W.J. (1979). Weak mixing angle and grand unified gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D20, 274.Google Scholar

Marciano, W.J. (1999). Fermi constants and New Physics, Phys. Rev. D60, 093006.Google Scholar

Marciano, W.J. (2011). Precision electroweak tests of the Standard Model, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 312, 102002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marciano, W.J. and Querjeiro, A. (1986). Bound on the W boson electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. D33, 3449.Google Scholar

Marciano, W.J. and Sirlin, A. (1980). Radiativecorrections to neutrino-induced neutral-current phenomena in the SU(2)L × U(1) theory, Phys. Rev. D22, 2695.Google Scholar

Marciano, W.J. and Sirlin, A. (1981). Precise SU(5) predictions for, mW and mz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshak, R.E., Riazuddin, , and Ryan, C.P. (1969). Theory of Weak Interactions in Particle Physics (Wiley, New York).

Martin, A. (1981). A simultaneous fit of and spectra, Phys. Lett. 100B, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melnikov, K. and Ritbergen, T.V. (2000). Thethree loop relation between the MS-barand the pole quark masses, Phys. Lett. B482, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mereghetti, E., Hockings, W.H., and van Kolck, U. (2010). The effective chiral lagrangian from the θ term, Annals Phys. 325, 2363.Google Scholar

Mikheev, S.P. and Smirnov, A.Y. (1985). Resonance amplification of oscillations in matter and spectroscopy of solarneutrinos, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42, 913.Google Scholar

Misiak, M.Asatrian, H.M., et al. (2007). Estimate of B → Xsγ at, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 022002.Google Scholar

Mohapatra, R.N., Antusch, S.et al. (2007). Theory of neutrinos: a White Paper, Rept. Prog. Phys. 70, 1757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mohr, P.J., Newell, D.B., and Taylor, B.N. (2012). CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2010, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morningstar, C.J. and Peardon, M.J. (1999). The glueball spectrum from an anisotropic lattice study, Phys. Rev. D60, 034509.Google Scholar

Muller, T. (2012). New results from the top quark (plenary talk delivered 7/10/12 at 36th Intl. Conf. for High Energy Physics [indico.cern.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId= 181298]).

Nambu, Y. and Lurie, D. (1962). Chirality conservation and soft pion production, Phys. Rev. 125, 1429.Google Scholar

Narison, S. (1989). QCD Spectral Sum Rules (World Scientific, Singapore).

Neubert, M. (2005). Effective field theory and heavy quark physics, TASI-2004 (hep-ph/0512222).

Noecker, M.C., Masterson, B.P., and Wieman, C.E. (1988). Precision measurement of parity nonconservation in atomic cesium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ochs, W. (2013). The status of glueballs, J. Phys. G40, 043001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ohl, T., Ricciardi, G., and Simmons, E.H. (1993). D–anti-D mixing in heavy quark effective field theory: the sequel, Nucl. Phys. B403, 605.Google Scholar

Okubo, S. (1962). Note on unitary symmetry in strong interactions, Prog. Theo. Phys. 27, 949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Okubo, S. (1963). φ meson and unitarity symmetry model, Phys. Lett. 5, 165.Google Scholar

Okun, L. (1982). Leptons and Quarks (North-Holland, Amsterdam).

Ovrut, B. and Schnitzer, H. (1980). Decoupling theorems for effective field theories, Phys. Rev. D22, 2518.Google Scholar

Pak, N.K. and Rossi, P. (1985). Gauged Goldstone boson effective action from direct integration of Bardeen anomaly, Nucl. Phys. B250, 279.Google Scholar

Parke, S.J. (1986). Nonadiabatic level crossing in resonant neutrino oscillation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peccei, R.D. (1989). The strong CP problem, in CP Violation, ed. C., Jarlskog (World Scientific, Singapore).

Peccei, R.D. and Quinn, H.R. (1977). CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelaez, J.R. (2004). On the nature of light scalar mesons from their large N(c) behavior, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 102001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peskin, M.E. and Takeuchi, T. (1990). New constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pich, A. (2013). Review of αs determinations (arXiv:1303.2262 [hep-ph]).

Pineda, A. and Soto, J. (1998). Effective field theory for ultrasoft momenta in NRQCD and NRQED, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 64, 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Politzer, H.D. (1973). Reliable perturbative results for strong interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Politzer, H.D. (1974). Asymptotic freedom: an approachto strong interactions, Phys. Rep. 14C, 274.Google Scholar

Pontecorvo, B. (1968). Neutrino experiments and the problem of conservation of leptonic charge, Sov. Phys. JETP 26, 984.Google Scholar

Porsev, S.G., Beloy, K., and Derevianko, A. (2009). Precision determination of electroweak coupling from atomic parity violation and implications for particle physics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 181601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porto, R.A., Ross, A., and Rothstein, I.Z. (2011). Spin induced multipole moments for the gravitational wave flux from binary inspirals to third Post-Newtonian order, JCAP 1103, 009.Google Scholar

Quaresma, M. (2012). Study of the nucleon spin structure by the Drell–Yan process in the COMPASS-II experiment, Acta. Phys. Polon. Suppl. 5, 1163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rafael, E. de (1998). An introduction to sum rules in QCD: course (arXiv:9802448 [hep-ph]).

Ramond, P. (1989). Field Theory: A Modern Primer (Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA).

Reinders, L.J., Rubenstein, H., and Yazaki, S. (1985). Hadron properties from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rep. 127, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richards, C.S.et al. (2010). Glueball mass measurments from improved staggered fermion simulations, Phys. Rev. D86, 034501.Google Scholar

Richardson, J. L. (1979). The heavy quark potential and the ⋎, J/ψ systems, Phys. Lett. 82B, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riggenbach, C., Gasser, J., Donoghue, J.F., and Holstein, B.R. (1991). Chiral symmetry and the large Nc limit in Kl4 decays, Phys. Rev. 43, 127.Google Scholar

Ritbergen, T. van, Vermaseren, J.A.M., and Larin, S.A. (1997). The four loop beta function in quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B400, 379.Google Scholar

Rothe, H.J. (2012). Lattice Gauge Theories: An Introduction (4th Edition) (World Scientific, Singapore).

Rosenzweig, C., Schechter, J., and Trahern, C.G. (1980). Is the effective lagrangian for QCD a σ model, Phys. Rev. D21, 3388.Google Scholar

Roy, S.M. (1971). Exact integral equation for pion pion scattering involving only physical region partial waves, Phys. Lett. B36, 353.Google Scholar

Sakharov, A.D. (1967). Violation of CP invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, JETP Lett. 5, 24.Google Scholar

Sakurai, J.J. (1969). Currents and Mesons (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).

Salam, A. (1969). Weak and electromagnetic interactions, in Elementary Particle Theory; Nobel Symposium No.8, ed. N., Svartholm (Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm).