Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

5 results

  • COMPLIANCE AND COMMAND III: CONDITIONAL IMPERATIVES

  • Part of
  • KIT FINE
  • Journal:
    The Review of Symbolic Logic , First View
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 December 2024, pp. 1-47
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • I apply truthmaker semantics to the logic of conditional imperatives.

Indeterminacy in the World

Indeterminacy in the World
  • Alessandro Torza
  • Published online:
    03 May 2023
    Print publication:
    01 June 2023
  • The way we represent the world in thought and language is shot through with indeterminacy: we speak of red apples and yellow apples without thereby committing to any sharp cutoff between the application of the predicate 'red' and of the predicate 'yellow'. But can reality itself be indeterminate? In other words, can indeterminacy originate in the mind-independent world, and not only in our representations? If so, can the phenomenon also arise at the microscopic scale of fundamental physics? Section 1 of this Element provides a brief overview of the question of indeterminacy. Section 2 discusses the thesis that the world is comprised of indeterminate objects, whereas Section 3 focuses on the thesis that there are indeterminate states of affairs. Finally, Section 4 is devoted to the case study of indeterminacy in quantum physics.

  • There Is No Distinctively Semantic Circularity Objection to Humean Laws

  • David Mark Kovacs
  • Journal:
    Canadian Journal of Philosophy / Volume 51 / Issue 4 / May 2021
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    06 July 2021, pp. 270-281
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Humeans identify the laws of nature with universal generalizations that systematize rather than govern the particular matters of fact. Humeanism is frequently accused of circularity: laws explain their instances, but Humean laws are, in turn, grounded by those instances. Unfortunately, this argument trades on controversial assumptions about grounding and explanation that Humeans routinely reject. However, recently an ostensibly semantic circularity objection has been offered, which seeks to avoid reading such assumptions into the Humean view. This paper argues that the new semantic version tacitly relies on the familiar metaphysical one and, therefore, it ultimately brings nothing new to the table.