Notre recherche visait à mettre en lumière les pratiques bientraitantes des préposées aux bénéficiaires en milieux d’hébergement pour aînés au Québec. L’objet de l’article est de faire ressortir la dichotomie entre les définitions de la bientraitance et son opérationnalisation. Dans la première partie, la notion de bientraitance dans le cadre de deux politiques gouvernementales québécoises est présentée. Ensuite, il est question du travail des préposées aux bénéficiaires en tant que vectrices de cette bientraitance dans la pratique. La troisième partie présente les résultats de notre recherche qui viennent soulever trois constats remettant en cause l’applicabilité des politiques publiques en cette matière : l’absence de reconnaissance d’un métier par définition bientraitant; les injonctions normatives à l’encontre du sens attribué à la bientraitance, et les obstacles organisationnels et sociopolitiques à la bientraitance. Ces constats sont réexaminés à la lumière des écrits dans la discussion, laquelle ouvre sur la notion de maltraitance organisationnelle.

Elder abuse is an important public health and human rights issue, yet its true extent is not well understood. To address this, we will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of elder abuse prevalence studies from around the world. This protocol describes the methodological approach to be adopted for conducting this systematic review and meta-analysis. In particular, the protocol describes the search strategies and eligibility criteria to be used to identify and select studies and how data from the selected studies will be extracted for analysis. The protocol also describes the analytical approach that will be used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates and discusses the use of meta-regression to assess how studies’ characteristics influence the prevalence estimates. This protocol conforms to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis – or PRISMA – guidelines and has been registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of systematic reviews.

The hidden nature of older adult mistreatment renders its detection in the domestic setting particularly challenging. A validated screening instrument that can provide a systematic assessment of risk factors can facilitate this detection. One such instrument, the “expanded Indicators of Abuse” tool, has been previously validated in the Hebrew language in a hospital setting. The present study has contributed to the validation of the “e-IOA” in an English-speaking community setting in Ontario, Canada. It consisted of two phases: (a) a content validity review and adaptation of the instrument by experts throughout Ontario, and (b) an inter-rater reliability assessment by home visiting nurses. The adaptation, the “Mistreatment of Older Adult Risk Factors” tool, offers a comprehensive tool for screening in the home setting. This instrument is significant to professional practice as practitioners working with older adults will be better equipped to assess for risk of mistreatment.