Settler-colonial futurity and colonial onto-epistemology are embedded across mainstream Australian public education institutions and schooling. While Country is central to Indigenous being, knowledges and pedagogy, Australian public and school education and curricula regularly fail to engage with Country and place in its historical, political, institutional, more-than-human, and relational dimensions. This paper investigates how colonial discourse and narratives permeate public and schooling education resources about mining and the Australian gold rush, including those presented in local Victorian gold rush museums. These support an influential story of Australia’s past/present that erases First Nations1 custodial relations with Country, strengthens settler-colonial futurity and celebrates and legitimises its colonising and extractive relations between people, Country, and ecologies. The paper presents an argument for attending to critical, relational geopolitics in education and environmental education to destabilise and shift these ways of understanding. It considers opportunities and challenges presented by Australian curricula in terms of their capacity to develop geopolitical understandings of past/present/future social and ecological in/justice, and to support new political understandings and sense of connection and belonging with Country.

Truth telling to persons living with dementia is a nuanced problem that demands negotiating between the hazards of principlism and the loving deceiver’s demand to lie as needed. To ban deception, as we do restraints, would be misguided and cruel. So too to demand we always tell the truth. We ought to adopt a practice called “creative care.” It begins with the premise that person’s living with dementia are capable of creativity. Creative care breaks down the mysterious fourth wall we build around persons living with dementia, especially persons with advanced dementia. It invites us to see a person living with dementia as a person who is capable of creating something beautiful. They need our time and words, not our lies and sedatives.

Objective: To determine the attitudes of patients with mild dementia and their carers towards the disclosure of diagnoses of cancer and dementia and whether there are differences between these groups. To determine whether any major adverse events occurred following disclosure of diagnosis of dementia. Design: A prospective study followed by a retrospective case-note study after 1 year. Participants and Setting: Fifty patients with mild dementia and their carers were recruited from a memory clinic in Nottingham, UK, and an old-age psychiatrist, using a semistructured questionnaire, separately interviewed them. Measures: Questions related to whether patients and their carers wished to be told diagnoses of cancer and dementia; the reasons for this; whether they would want treatment and make use of predictive testing if available were included. At 1-year follow-up whether antidepressants had been prescribed and whether any catastrophic reaction had occurred following disclosure of diagnosis. Results: An overwhelming majority of patients with mild dementia wished to be informed of their diagnosis (92%); even more (98%) of the same patient sample reported wanting disclosure of a hypothetical diagnosis of cancer. A higher proportion (98%) of carers would wish to be told if they were to develop either dementia or cancer. All patients and carers would like access to treatment for dementia. A total of 88% of patients and 86% of carers would make use of a predictive test of Alzheimer's disease. Before receiving a diagnosis of mild dementia, only 28% of patients had insight that they may have dementia. Only a quarter (26%) of carers did not want the doctor to disclose the diagnosis of dementia to the patient. After 1 year, 6% of the original sample had developed a depressive illness requiring antidepressant treatment and no major incidents had occurred following disclosure of diagnosis. Conclusions: There has been a growing debate on whether patients with dementia should be informed of their diagnosis. Until recently, little was known about the views of patients themselves. This study shows that the vast majority of patients with mild dementia wish to be fully informed. Despite increasing awareness, a quarter of carers still do not wish their relative to be informed, though wish to be informed if they themselves were to develop the illness. This is significantly lower, however, than previously reported, suggesting a shift in attitudes. This study adds support to the weight of evidence that disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia does not cause depression or any irreversible harm to the patient.