We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The creation of a healthy food environment is highly dependent on the policies that governments choose to implement. The objective of this study is to compare the level of implementation of current public policies aimed at creating healthy food environments in Burkina Faso with international good practice indicators.
Design:
This evaluation was carried out using the Food-EPI tool. The tool has 2 components (policy and infrastructure support), 13 domains and 56 good practice indicators adapted to the Burkina Faso context.
Setting:
Burkina Faso
Participants:
Expert evaluators divided into two groups: the group of independent experts from universities, NGOs and civil society, and the group of experts from various government sectors.
Results:
Among the 56 indicators, it was assessed the level of implementation as “high” for 6 indicators, “medium” for 24 indicators, “low” for 22 indicators and “very low” for 4 indicators. High implementation level indicators include strong and visible political support, targets on exclusive breastfeeding and complementary feeding, strong and visible political support for actions to combat all forms of malnutrition, monitoring of exclusive breastfeeding and complementary feeding indicators, monitoring of promotion and growth surveillance programs and coordination mechanism (national, state and local government). The indicators on menu labelling, reducing taxes on healthy foods, increasing taxes on unhealthy foods and dietary guidelines are the indicators with a “very low” level of implementation in Burkina Faso.
Conclusions:
The general results showed that there is a clear need for further improvements in policy and infrastructure support to promote healthy food environments.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.