Primate retinal ganglion cells that project to the magnocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus (M) are much more sensitive to luminance contrast than those ganglion cells projecting to the parvocellular layers (P). We now report that increasing contrast modifies the temporal-frequency response of M cells, but not of P cells. With rising contrast, the M cells' responses to sinusoidal stimuli show an increasing attenuation at low temporal frequencies while the P cells' responses scale uniformly. The characteristic features of M-cell dynamics are well described by a model originally developed for the X and Y cells of the cat, where the hypothesized nonlinear feedback mechanism responsible for this behavior has been termed the contrast gain control (Shapley & Victor, 1978, 1981; Victor, 1987, 1988). These data provide further physiological evidence that the M-cell pathway differs from the P-cell pathway with regard to the functional elements in the retina. Furthermore, the similarity in dynamics between primate M cells and cat X and Y retinal ganglion cells suggests the possibility that P cells, being different from either group, are a primate specialization not found in the retinae of lower mammals.

Effects of light adaptation on contrast processing in the outer retina were investigated over nearly four decades of background illumination by analyzing the intracellular responses of 111 bipolar cells, 66 horizontal cells, and 22 cone photoreceptors in the superfused eyecup of the tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum). Light adaptation had striking and similar effects on the average contrast responses of the hyperpolarizing (Bh) and depolarizing (Bd) classes of bipolar cells: Over the lower two decades of background illumination, the contrast gain increased 7-fold to reach values as high as 20–30, the dynamic range and the half-maximum contrast decreased by about 60%, the total voltage range increased some 40%, and contrast dominance changed from highly positive to more balanced. At higher levels of background, most aspects of the contrast response stabilized and Weber's Law then held closely. In this background range, the contrast gain of bipolar cells was amplified some 20× relative to that of cones whereas the corresponding amplification in horizontal cells was about 6×. Differences in the growth of contrast gain with the intensity of the background illumination for cones versus bipolar cells suggest that there are at least two adaptation-dependent mechanisms regulating contrast gain. One is evident in the cone photoresponse such that an approximately linear relation holds between the steady-state hyperpolarization and contrast gain. The other arises between the voltage responses of the cones and bipolar cells. It could be presynaptic (modulation of cone transmitter release by horizontal cell feedback or other mechanisms) and/or postsynaptic, that is, intrinsic to bipolar cells. Contrast gain grew with the background intensity by a larger factor in horizontal than in bipolar cells. This provides a basis for the widely held view that light adaptation increases the strength of surround antagonism in bipolar cells. On average, the effects of light adaptation and most quantitative indices of contrast processing were remarkably similar for Bd and Bh cells, implying that both classes of bipolar cells, despite possible differences in underlying mechanisms, are about equally capable of encoding all primary aspects of contrast at all levels of light adaptation.