Hostname: page-component-5f56664f6-2gss9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-08T02:26:51.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contrast gain control in the primate retina: P cells are not X-like, some M cells are

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Ethan A. Benardete ,
Ehud Kaplan  and
Bruce W. Knight
Ethan A. Benardete
Affiliation:
The Rockefeller University, Laboratory of Biophysics, New York
Ehud Kaplan
Affiliation:
The Rockefeller University, Laboratory of Biophysics, New York
Bruce W. Knight
Affiliation:
The Rockefeller University, Laboratory of Biophysics, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Primate retinal ganglion cells that project to the magnocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus (M) are much more sensitive to luminance contrast than those ganglion cells projecting to the parvocellular layers (P). We now report that increasing contrast modifies the temporal-frequency response of M cells, but not of P cells. With rising contrast, the M cells' responses to sinusoidal stimuli show an increasing attenuation at low temporal frequencies while the P cells' responses scale uniformly. The characteristic features of M-cell dynamics are well described by a model originally developed for the X and Y cells of the cat, where the hypothesized nonlinear feedback mechanism responsible for this behavior has been termed the contrast gain control (Shapley & Victor, 1978, 1981; Victor, 1987, 1988). These data provide further physiological evidence that the M-cell pathway differs from the P-cell pathway with regard to the functional elements in the retina. Furthermore, the similarity in dynamics between primate M cells and cat X and Y retinal ganglion cells suggests the possibility that P cells, being different from either group, are a primate specialization not found in the retinae of lower mammals.

Keywords

Primate retinaDynamicsCat retinaContrast processing
Type
Short Communication
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 8 , Issue 5 , May 1992 , pp. 483 - 486
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bates, D.M. & Watts, D.G. (1988). Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouras, P. (1968). Identification of cone mechanisms in monkey ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology (London) 199, 533–547.Google Scholar
Gouras, P. (1969). Antidromic responses of orthodromically identified ganglion cells in monkey retina. Journal of Physiology (London) 204, 407–419.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. & Shapley, R.M. (1982). X and Y cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque monkeys. Journal of Physiology (London) 330, 125–143.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. & Shapley, R. (1984). The origin of the S (slow) potential in the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus. Experimental Brain Research 55, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, E. & Shapley, R.M. (1986). The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 83, 2755–2757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, E., Lee, B.B. & Shapley, R.M. (1990). New views of primate retinal function. In Progress in Retinal Research, Vol. 9, ed. OsBorne, N. & Chader, J., pp. 273–336. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Milkman, N., Schick, G., Rossetto, M., Ratliff, F., Shapley, R. & Victor, J. (1980). A two-dimensional computer-controlled visual stimulator. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation 12, 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzdorf, U. & Singer, W. (1977). Laminar segregation of afferents to lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: An analysis of current source density. Journal of Neurophysiology 40, 1227–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purpura, K., Tranchina, D., Kaplan, E. & Shapley, R.M. (1990). Light adaptation in the primate retina: Analysis of changes in gain and dynamics of monkey retinal ganglion cells. Visual Neuroscience 4, 75–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rakic, P. (1977). Genesis of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology 176, 23–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapley, R.M. & Victor, J.D. (1978). The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology (London) 285, 275–298.Google Scholar
Shapley, R.M. & Victor, J.D. (1981). How the contrast gain control modifies the frequency responses of cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology (London) 318, 161–179.Google Scholar
Shatz, C.J. (1981). Inside-out pattern of neurogenesis of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 7, 140.Google Scholar
Smith, V.C., Pokorny, J. & Lee, B.B. (1991). The contrast gain of Pand M-pathway cells expressed in cone contrast units. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 32, 1799.Google Scholar
Victor, J.D. (1987). The dynamics of the cat retinal X cell centre. Journal of Physiology (London) 386, 219–246.Google Scholar
Victor, J.D. (1988). The dynamics of the cat retinal Y cell subunit. Journal of Physiology (London) 405, 289–320.Google Scholar
Victor, J.D. & Knight, B.W. (1979). Nonlinear analysis with an arbitrary stimulus ensemble. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 37, 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Victor, J.D. & Mast, J. (1991). A new statistic for steady-state evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 78, 378–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Victor, J. & Shapley, R. (1980). A method of nonlinear analysis in the frequency domain. Biophysical Journal 29, 459–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed