The basic local independence model (BLIM) is a probabilistic model developed in knowledge space theory (KST). Recently, Stefanutti, de Chiusole, et al. (2020, Psychometrika 85, 684–715) proposed the polytomous local independence model (PoLIM), which is an extension of the BLIM to items with more than two response alternatives (polytomous items). In a Commentary to this paper, Chiu et al. (2023, Psychometrika 88, 656–671) claimed that (i) the BLIM is just a deterministic input noisy AND-gate (DINA) model where every item has a single skill and, as a consequence of this, (ii) the “PoLIM is simply a paraphrase of a DINA model in cognitive diagnosis (CD) for polytomous items” (p. 656). This rejoinder shows that such statements are invalid and totally misleading. Its aim is to clarify the nature of the relationship between the BLIM and the DINA, as well as that between the PoLIM and the Polytomous DINA. It builds upon formal results by Heller, et al. (2015, Psychometrika 80(4), 995–1019) on the intimate relation between KST and CD notions, and shows that the BLIM/PoLIM may be conceived as marginal models for whole classes of CD models.

Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) are useful statistical tools in cognitive diagnosis assessment. However, as many other latent variable models, the CDMs often suffer from the non-identifiability issue. This work gives the sufficient and necessary condition for identifiability of the basic DINA model, which not only addresses the open problem in Xu and Zhang (Psychometrika 81:625–649, 2016) on the minimal requirement for identifiability, but also sheds light on the study of more general CDMs, which often cover DINA as a submodel. Moreover, we show the identifiability condition ensures the consistent estimation of the model parameters. From a practical perspective, the identifiability condition only depends on the Q-matrix structure and is easy to verify, which would provide a guideline for designing statistically valid and estimable cognitive diagnosis tests.

Latent class models with covariates are widely used for psychological, social, and educational research. Yet the fundamental identifiability issue of these models has not been fully addressed. Among the previous research on the identifiability of latent class models with covariates, Huang and Bandeen-Roche (Psychometrika 69:5–32, 2004) studied the local identifiability conditions. However, motivated by recent advances in the identifiability of the restricted latent class models, particularly cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs), we show in this work that the conditions in Huang and Bandeen-Roche (Psychometrika 69:5–32, 2004) are only necessary but not sufficient to determine the local identifiability of the model parameters. To address the open identifiability issue for latent class models with covariates, this work establishes conditions to ensure the global identifiability of the model parameters in both strict and generic sense. Moreover, our results extend to the polytomous-response CDMs with covariates, which generalizes the existing identifiability results for CDMs.

A number of empirically based Q-matrix validation methods are available in the literature, all of which were developed for cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) involving dichotomous attributes. However, in many applications, it is more instructionally relevant to classify students into more than two categories (e.g., no mastery, basic mastery, and advanced mastery). To extend the practical utility of CDMs, methods for validating the Q-matrix for CDMs that measure polytomous attributes are needed. This study focuses on validating the Q-matrix of the generalized deterministic input, noisy, “and” gate model for polytomous attributes (pG-DINA). The pGDI, an extension of the G-DINA model discrimination index, is proposed for polytomous attributes. The pGDI serves as the basis of a validation method that can be used not only to identify potential misspecified q-entries, but also to suggest more appropriate attribute-level specifications. The theoretical properties of the pGDI are underpinned by several mathematical proofs, whereas its practical viability is examined using simulation studies covering various conditions. The results show that the method can accurately identify misspecified q-entries and suggest the correct attribute-level specifications, particularly when high-quality items are involved. The pGDI is applied to a proportional reasoning test that measures several polytomous attributes.

Estimation of the large Q-matrix in cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) with many items and latent attributes from observational data has been a huge challenge due to its high computational cost. Borrowing ideas from deep learning literature, we propose to learn the large Q-matrix by restricted Boltzmann machines (RBMs) to overcome the computational difficulties. In this paper, key relationships between RBMs and CDMs are identified. Consistent and robust learning of the Q-matrix in various CDMs is shown to be valid under certain conditions. Our simulation studies under different CDM settings show that RBMs not only outperform the existing methods in terms of learning speed, but also maintain good recovery accuracy of the Q-matrix. In the end, we illustrate the applicability and effectiveness of our method through a TIMSS mathematics data set.

Cognitive diagnosis models are partially ordered latent class models and are used to classify students into skill mastery profiles. The deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate model (DINA) is a popular psychometric model for cognitive diagnosis. Application of the DINA model requires content expert knowledge of a Q matrix, which maps the attributes or skills needed to master a collection of items. Misspecification of Q has been shown to yield biased diagnostic classifications. We propose a Bayesian framework for estimating the DINA Q matrix. The developed algorithm builds upon prior research (Chen, Liu, Xu, & Ying, in J Am Stat Assoc 110(510):850–866, 2015) and ensures the estimated Q matrix is identified. Monte Carlo evidence is presented to support the accuracy of parameter recovery. The developed methodology is applied to Tatsuoka’s fraction-subtraction dataset.

This paper uses log-linear models with latent variables (Hagenaars, in Loglinear Models with Latent Variables, 1993) to define a family of cognitive diagnosis models. In doing so, the relationship between many common models is explicitly defined and discussed. In addition, because the log-linear model with latent variables is a general model for cognitive diagnosis, new alternatives to modeling the functional relationship between attribute mastery and the probability of a correct response are discussed.

Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) provide a powerful statistical and psychometric tool for researchers and practitioners to learn fine-grained diagnostic information about respondents’ latent attributes. There has been a growing interest in the use of CDMs for polytomous response data, as more and more items with multiple response options become widely used. Similar to many latent variable models, the identifiability of CDMs is critical for accurate parameter estimation and valid statistical inference. However, the existing identifiability results are primarily focused on binary response models and have not adequately addressed the identifiability of CDMs with polytomous responses. This paper addresses this gap by presenting sufficient and necessary conditions for the identifiability of the widely used DINA model with polytomous responses, with the aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the identifiability of CDMs with polytomous responses and to inform future research in this field.