Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-h6p2m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-06T22:43:01.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changing paradigms for the micronutrient zinc, a known protein cofactor, as a signal relaying also cellular redox state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2025

Ute Krämer*
Affiliation:
Molecular Genetics and Physiology of Plants, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
*
Corresponding author: Ute Krämer. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The micronutrient zinc (Zn) is often poorly available but toxic when present in excess, so a tightly controlled Zn homoeostasis network operates in all organisms. This review summarizes our present understanding of plant Zn homoeostasis. In Arabidopsis, about 1,900 Zn-binding metalloproteins require Zn as a cofactor. Abundant Zn metalloproteins reside in plastids, mitochondria and peroxisomes, emphasizing the need to address how Zn reaches these proteins. Apo–Zn metalloproteins do not acquire Zn2+ from a cytosolic pool of free cations, but instead through associative ligand exchange from Zn-buffering molecules. The importance of cytosolic thiols in Zn buffering suggests that, besides elevated Zn influx, a more oxidized redox state is also predicted to cause elevated labile-bound Zn levels, consistent with the suppression of a Zn deficiency marker under oxidative stress. Therefore, we consider a broadened physiological scope in plants for a possible signalling role of Zn2+, experimentally supported only in animals to date.

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with John Innes Centre

1. Nutritional Zn requirements in plants and a narrow range of permissive Zn concentrations

Minimum required concentrations of the micronutrient zinc (Zn) in living tissues of land plants are around 30 μM, corresponding to 20 mg kg−1 dry biomass (Krämer, Reference Krämer2010, Reference Krämer2024; Marschner & Marschner, Reference Marschner and Marschner2012; Sinclair & Krämer, Reference Sinclair and Krämer2012; Stanton et al., Reference Stanton, Sanders, Krämer and Podar2022). Plants experience Zn toxicity generally above ~300 mg kg−1 dry biomass (450 μM). Thus, the range of tissue Zn levels permissive for plant growth is narrow by comparison to most other mineral nutrients, although plants store considerable amounts of Zn in harmless form inside the vacuoles (usually ~100 μM, see below) and extracellularly bound to cell walls, where they are separated from the most sensitive metabolic pathways. Plants can face Zn deficiency because of its generally low abundance in soils, with totals between 10 and 300, and an average of around 55 mg Zn kg−1 (Noulas et al., Reference Noulas, Tziouvalekas and Karyotis2018). More importantly, Zn2+ cations are poorly soluble, resulting in low Zn concentrations of ~1 μM in the soil solution from which plants take up nutrients (Krämer, Reference Krämer2024; Marschner & Marschner, Reference Marschner and Marschner2012). When present in excess, Zn can cause toxicity directly, and also indirectly through nutrient imbalances arising from the competition between Zn2+ and other divalent cations for uptake by roots and within the plant (Krämer, Reference Krämer2024). There are well-known examples of soils containing excess, toxic levels of Zn, and of Zn-deficient soils, as well as of plant species, ecotypes and crop varieties capable of growing on such soils (Alloway, Reference Alloway2009; Ernst, Reference Ernst1974; Marschner & Marschner, Reference Marschner and Marschner2012). Moreover, even in common plants including the major reference species, researchers have characterized considerable Zn-related plasticity comprising responses to both Zn deficiency and Zn excess (Assunção, Reference Assunção2022; Sinclair & Krämer, Reference Sinclair and Krämer2012). This implies that all land plants encounter non-optimal Zn levels internally during their life cycle and externally in their roots’ microenvironment. The latter is likely to reflect heterogeneity and dynamics in soil composition at multiple scales (Stark, Reference Stark, Caldwell and Pearcy1994). In natural settings, the activities of symbiotic and associated microbes contribute to root Zn acquisition and the exclusion of excess Zn (Gonzalez-Guerrero et al., Reference Gonzalez-Guerrero, Escudero, Saez and Tejada-Jimenez2016). Most of our present knowledge of the involved molecular mechanisms was acquired by studying plants in isolation, and yet, it evidently has major predictive relevance also for plants cultivated in the soil in the presence of microbes (Sinclair & Krämer, Reference Sinclair and Krämer2012; Stanton et al., Reference Stanton, Sanders, Krämer and Podar2022; Thiébaut & Hanikenne, Reference Thiébaut and Hanikenne2022). In light of fluctuations in both environmental Zn availability and internal Zn demands, plant Zn homoeostasis has the roles of preventing Zn toxicity and of maintaining the functionality of all Zn-requiring proteins. A second, broader biological role of Zn homoeostasis in general Zn2+-dependent signalling and regulation is discussed in this article, and a third role in mineral co-option (such as elemental defence) has recently been addressed elsewhere (Krämer, Reference Krämer2024).

2. Distinctive biological chemistry of the micronutrient Zn provided opportunities for evolutionary innovations

The transition metal element Zn, which is positioned in the d-block of the periodic table, occurs exclusively in the +II oxidation state in biology (Fraústo da Silva & Williams, Reference Fraústo da Silva and Williams2001; Krezel & Maret, Reference Krezel and Maret2016). Adding on to the low solubility of many ZnII salts, such as phosphates and oxides, the Zn2+ cation acts as a strong Lewis acid that establishes exceptionally stable high-affinity coordinative bonds in solution to form complexes with a large variety of ligands acting as free electron pair donors, by comparison to Mg2+ and Ca2+ (Box 1.1) (Fraústo da Silva & Williams, Reference Fraústo da Silva and Williams2001). The so-called chelation of Zn2+, which is coordinative Zn2+ binding to the free electron pairs of several donor atoms of the same ligand molecule, can form particularly stable complexes – a characteristic of the divalent cations of transition metal elements, as well as of the alkaline earth metals Mg2+ and Ca2+. When a metal cation undergoes complex formation in the presence of a ligand, this decreases the ‘chemically active’ concentration of the metal cation interacting merely with surrounding water molecules (‘free aqueous’, ‘hydrated’; Me n+ aq, e.g., Zn2+ aq). As a result, another additional ligand or binding partner will tend to bind lower net total concentrations of the metal at chemical equilibrium.

After binding to a ligand metabolite or a protein, the dissociation of Zn2+ to form the hydrated cation occurs far more slowly than for Ca2+, for example (dissociation rate constant k off is around five orders of magnitude smaller, based on approximated generalized rate constants) (Fraústo da Silva & Williams, Reference Fraústo da Silva and Williams2001). Zn2+ can displace not only Ca2+ and Mg2+ but even other transition metal micronutrient cations, such as Fe2+, Mn2+ and Co2+, from solvent-exposed binding sites of proteins and bound ligands of any chemical nature, following the Irving–Williams series (Box 1.2) (Fraústo da Silva & Williams, Reference Fraústo da Silva and Williams2001). The stability of Zn complexes is generally the largest for the binding of Zn2+ involving thiol groups, followed by free electron pairs of nitrogen atoms and, subsequently, oxygen atoms contained in ligands (Williams, Reference Williams2012). Moreover, compared to Fe2+, Mn2+ and Co2+, the increase in stability of a complex formed with Zn2+ is generally the largest for thiol, intermediate for nitrogen, and the smallest for oxygen coordination (Williams, Reference Williams2012).

As a strong Lewis acid, Zn2+ is highly effective in polarizing bound ligands (Box 1.1). Its preferred coordination geometry is tetrahedral, but more flexible than that of other transition metal cations (Krezel & Maret, Reference Krezel and Maret2016; Stanton et al., Reference Stanton, Sanders, Krämer and Podar2022). Whereas dissociative ligand exchange via a free hydrated aqueous Zn2+ cation (Zn2+ aq) intermediate occurs exceedingly slowly, associative ligand exchange, that is an exchange of ligands directly on the metal without any formation of Zn2+ aq as an intermediate, can occur rapidly, in the order of 106 times faster (Box 1.3) (Costello et al., Reference Costello, Fenselau and Franklin2011; Foster et al., Reference Foster, Osman and Robinson2014; Heinz et al., Reference Heinz, Kiefer, Tholey and Adolph2005; Krezel & Maret, Reference Krezel and Maret2016). Thus, associative ligand exchange is now thought to be of central relevance also for the integration of Zn into apo-metalloproteins (protein metalation) and not only for Zn-mediated catalysis in vivo. In summary, the biological chemistry of Zn2+ is distinct from that of other nutrient and non-nutrient transition metal cations, and it differs decisively from that of alkali and alkaline earth metal cations including Ca2+.

Box 1. Glossary

  1. 1. Lewis acid: electrophilic (‘electron-loving’) acceptor ion or molecule capable of attaching itself to an electron pair of a donor ion or molecule (Lewis base)

  2. 2. Irving–Williams series of increasing stability of complexes with ligands i :

    Ca2+/Mg2+ < Mn2+ < Fe2+ < Co2+ < Ni2+ < Cu2+ > Zn2+

  3. 3. Dissociative ligand exchange versus associative ligand exchange on Zn2+:

    1. (a) Dissociative: P + [ZnX] ↔ P + Zn 2+ aq + X ↔ [PZn] + X

    2. (b) Associative: P + [ZnX] ↔ [PZnX] ↔ [PZn] + X

      (X: ligand; P: target protein; chemists group the components of a metal complex using square brackets)

  4. 4. Zn metalloprotein types ii (classification suggested by Krämer, Reference Krämer2024):

    Type I Zn metalloprotein: depends on bound Zn2+ acting as a structural or catalytic cofactor for its biological function as an enzyme or transcription factor, for example

    (but excluding Type II)

    Type II Zn metalloprotein: acting directly in metal homoeostasis and functioning to reversibly bind Zn2+ or a Zn-containing complex, with roles in the transmembrane transport, storage, detoxification, mobilization, immobilization, movement, shuttling, transfer or the acquisition of Zn, for example

    Type III Zn metalloprotein: regulatory switch capable of Zn2+ binding and dissociation, thus toggling between two opposing functional states (a Zn2+-bound and a Zn2+-free state), which activates or deactivates a biological process or a signalling cascade

  1. 5. Metal buffer and buffered available Zn 2+ concentration: Zn2+ and all other cations that have similar binding properties (predominantly transition metal cations), as well as all ligands and solvent-accessible metal-binding sites capable of reversibly binding Zn2+ or other metals provided by (a) low-molecular-mass organic and inorganic compounds, and the surfaces of (b) proteins and other macromolecules or structures present in the cytosol or the chloroplast stroma, for example

    1. (a) glutathione (GSH); free amino acids (glutamate, glutamine, histidine and others); organic acids (citrate, malate); nicotianamine; phytochelatins; ATP; inositol phosphates (including phytate); other phosphates and diphosphates iii , for example

    2. (b) metallothioneins as specialized Zn2+-buffering proteins, all surface-exposed metal-binding sites of proteins, of membrane surfaces, and of carbohydrates, for example

    The buffered available Zn 2+ concentration [Zn II b ] corresponds only formally to a concentration of free aqueous Zn 2+ (Zn 2+ aq ). It reflects the free energy that quantifies the availability of Zn2+ to bind to another ligand.

  1. i Binding/stability constant Ks = k on/k off; the dissociation constant K d = Ks −1 ; pK d = −Log10 K d.

  2. ii Different from here, Zn2+ as used here is often referred to as ‘Zn’, ‘Zn(II)’ or ‘ZnII’, and ‘Zn2+’ is often used to refer to Zn2+ aq elsewhere in plant biology and biochemistry texts.

  3. iii Phosphates and free aqueous metal cations are prone to forming precipitates, which are no longer quantitatively part of the metal buffer. Organisms are likely to keep precipitation at a minimum at cellular sites of protein metalation outside storage sites in seeds and in (part of the) vacuoles, for instance.

3. The functions of Zn in the plant metalloproteome

Of the 27,500 protein-coding loci of Arabidopsis, about 1,900 proteins (7%) were estimated to be Zn metalloproteins (Andreini et al., Reference Andreini, Banci, Bertini and Rosato2006, Reference Andreini, Bertini and Rosato2009; Zhang & Krämer, Reference Zhang and Krämer2018) – a list that has to be considered preliminary. These proteins comprise enzymes that depend on Zn2+ as a catalytic cofactor participating directly in substrate conversion or as a structural cofactor conferring the functional three-dimensional tertiary structure of a protein (Type I metalloproteins; Box 1.4). Proteins mediating transmembrane Zn transport or Zn binding directly in the operational maintenance of plant Zn homoeostasis are also addressed as Zn metalloproteins (Type II; Box 1.4). In comparison to metals with similar chemical properties, Zn2+-mediated catalysis is faster and is more versatile, thus explaining the use of Zn as a cofactor of enzymes across all functional classes (Fraústo da Silva & Williams, Reference Fraústo da Silva and Williams2001). Its high binding affinities and the absence of redox transitions under biologically relevant conditions may explain the exceptionally widespread use of Zn2+ as a structural cofactor, such as in Zn finger domains which often mediate protein–DNA or protein–protein interactions.

Comparisons among organisms suggest an increasing use of Zn2+ with evolution, from 5% to 6% of bacterial and archaeal proteomes to around 9% in eukaryotes (Andreini et al., Reference Andreini, Bertini and Rosato2009). Early during the evolution of life, Zn was immobilized in the form of insoluble sulphides and, thus, was unavailable. With ~108-fold increased levels of Zn (to around 10 nM) in the oceans upon the oxygenation of the Earth’s atmosphere, organisms apparently evolved to gradually replace other metals, in particular Ni2+, Co2+ and Fe2+, by Zn2+ as a catalytic cofactor in a variety of enzymatic functions (Fraústo da Silva & Williams, Reference Fraústo da Silva and Williams2001; Krämer, Reference Krämer2024). In addition, novel protein functions in transcriptional regulation and protein–protein interactions increasingly made use of Zn in the evolution of eukaryotes and multicellular organisms, alongside an overall elevated bioavailability of Zn on land. Compared to our knowledge of type I and type II metalloproteins, which remains sketchy and relies heavily on in silico predictions, our knowledge of type III Zn metalloproteins (Zn2+ sensors; Box 1.4) in plants is even less developed because of their poor conservation across the kingdoms of life (Andreini et al., Reference Andreini, Banci, Bertini and Rosato2006, Reference Andreini, Bertini and Rosato2009; Krämer, Reference Krämer2024). Type III metalloproteins are characterized by the presence of facultative metal binding sites, which confer alternate protein functional states in the metal-bound and -unbound forms. Important examples of Zn2+ sensors in plants are the basic leucine zipper proteins AtbZIP19 and AtbZIP23, two partly redundant activators of the transcription of genes encoding Zn2+ transporters and chelator biosynthetic enzymes constituting a subset of the known transcriptional Zn deficiency responses (Assunção et al., Reference Assunção, Herrero, Lin, Huettel, Talukdar, Smaczniak and Aarts2010; Lilay et al., Reference Lilay, Persson, Castro, Liao, Alexander, Aarts and Assunção2021) (Figure 1a). These proteins contain a Zn2+-binding motif in the N-terminal region preceding the DNA-binding motif and the leucine zipper, and only their apo-form is capable of activating transcription (Assunção, Reference Assunção2022; Lilay et al., Reference Lilay, Castro, Campilho and Assunção2018). In addition, the root high-affinity Fe uptake protein iron-regulated transporter 1 (IRT1) could be considered another example of a type III Zn metalloprotein. The binding of Zn2+, which is a secondary substrate of the transporter, to a cytosolic loop of IRT1 triggers its own phosphorylation, polyubiquitination-mediated removal from the plasma membrane and degradation (Dubeaux et al., Reference Dubeaux, Neveu, Zelazny and Vert2018).

Figure 1. Cellular zinc homoeostasis in plants. (a) Cellular Zn homoeostasis and the cytosolic Zn buffer. (b) Cytosolic buffered available metal cation concentrations in Salmonella enterica (grey line around symbols) and in Arabidopsis thaliana (for Zn2+ only, green line around symbol). [ZnII b], the buffered available Zn2+ concentration, is dependent on the metal buffer. Cytosolic Zn is present in the form of Zn complexes of low-molecular-mass ligands, such as glutathione (GSH) to form [Zn(GS)2], nicotianamine ([ZnNA]), phytochelatins ([ZnPC]), histidine ([ZnHis]) (ligand biosynthesis not shown), as well as Zn-binding sites of type I Zn metalloproteins (not shown) and metallothionein (MT) (a). Dashed arrow indicates the movement of mRNAs (drawn line ending in AAA, with names) of bZIP19/23 target genes out of the nucleus under Zn deficiency (a). C, plastid; Cit, citrate; ER, endoplasmatic reticulum; G, Golgi apparatus; L, ligand forming Zn complex; M, mitochondrium; P, peroxisome; PD: plasmodesma; X, phosphate or other anion forming Zn-precipitates. Yellow stripe-like (YSL) and natural resistance associated macrophage protein (NRAMP) family proteins can transport Zn, but critical roles in Zn homoeostasis have not yet been demonstrated for them in Arabidopsis. They might alternatively mediate Zn influx into the cytosol across other membranes, such as the plasma membrane. See text for other abbreviations and descriptions; more details have been described elsewhere (Sinclair & Krämer, Reference Sinclair and Krämer2012).

Of the 1,921 Zn metalloproteins (Zhang & Krämer, Reference Zhang and Krämer2018) identified based on known Zn-binding motifs (Andreini et al., Reference Andreini, Bertini and Rosato2009), proteomics of Arabidopsis rosette leaves identified 636 (Mergner et al., Reference Mergner, Frejno, List, Papacek, Chen, Chaudhary and Küster2020a), as can be established by comparing published datasets. Furthermore, approximated relative numbers of Zn-metalloprotein molecules were about 10%–20% higher in the oldest leaf than in the youngest leaf. According to proteomics-based abundance estimates, carbonic anhydrases, proteases, Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle and central metabolism enzymes were among the top 15 most abundant Zn metalloproteins in leaves, with an apparent predominance of plastid-localized proteins (Table 1, similar when using leaf data from Mergner et al., Reference Mergner, Frejno, Messerer, Lang, Samaras, Wilhelm and Küster2020b). Cytosolic ribosomal Zn metalloproteins were among the most abundant proteins in pollen, roots and the shoot apical meristem, for example (Mergner et al., Reference Mergner, Frejno, Messerer, Lang, Samaras, Wilhelm and Küster2020b).

Table 1 The top 15 most abundant Zn proteins in leaves of Arabidopsis

a https://suba.live/; cyt, cytosol; gol, Golgi apparatus; mt, mitochondria; per, peroxisomes; pl, plastids; pm, plasma membrane.

b Numbers are mio. TMT (tandem mass tags), as a preliminary approximation of abundance (Mergner et al., Reference Mergner, Frejno, Messerer, Lang, Samaras, Wilhelm and Küster2020b).

c Calvin–Benson–Bassham Cycle.

d Central metabolism.

f Splicing of Group II introns, relevant for chloroplast ribosome.

4. Protein metalation: how Zn2+ cations reach their cognate binding sites

Given the comparably high binding affinity of Zn2+ for a variety of ligands, the questions arise of how it is incorporated (exclusively) in its cognate binding sites of newly synthesized apo-metalloproteins and how the cell prevents the binding of other metals, in particular Cu (Box 1.2). Extrapolating from studies in bacteria and mammalian cells, our present concept of protein metalation in plants is now based entirely on associative ZnII transfer (see above; Box 1.3) (Costello et al., Reference Costello, Fenselau and Franklin2011; Foster et al., Reference Foster, Young, Chivers and Robinson2022b; Krämer, Reference Krämer2024). A Zn-trafficking metallochaperone protein, in analogy with the role of Cu-metallochaperones in the metalation of apo-Cu-metalloproteins, is only known for one single Zn-dependent protein of plants to date (Pasquini et al., Reference Pasquini, Grosjean, Hixson, Nicora, Yee, Lipton and Blaby-Haas2022). Instead, the metalation of Zn-dependent apo-metalloproteins is now thought to occur co- or post-translationally from the cellular metal buffer via rapid ligand exchange reactions (Box 1.5) (Foster et al., Reference Foster, Young, Chivers and Robinson2022b; Krezel & Maret, Reference Krezel and Maret2016). The metal buffer consists of labile-bound ZnII and other transition metals and an overall excess of ligands and solvent-accessible metal-binding sites provided by a complex mix of metabolites, inorganic compounds, protein surfaces and other macromolecules, which can chelate Zn2+ (Figure 1a) (Foster et al., Reference Foster, Young, Chivers and Robinson2022b; Osman & Robinson, Reference Osman and Robinson2023). In bacteria, intracellular buffered available Zn2+ concentrations are thus maintained in the femtomolar to picomolar range (2 pM in aerobically cultivated Escherichia coli), which allows the adequate metalation of Zn and other metalloproteins (Box 1.5, Figures 1b and 2a) (Foster et al., Reference Foster, Young, Chivers and Robinson2022b; Outten & O’Halloran, Reference Outten and O'Halloran2001). This implies that there are no free hydrated Zn2+ ions in the bacterial cytoplasm statistically, despite total intracellular Zn concentrations in the sub-millimolar range (Foster et al., Reference Foster, Clough, Aki, Young, Clarke and Robinson2022a; Outten & O’Halloran, Reference Outten and O'Halloran2001). In Arabidopsis, total intracellular Zn concentrations are thought to be at similar levels and cytosolic buffered available Zn2+ levels were reported at 400 pM under standard conditions and 2 nM under excess-Zn conditions – at least 100-fold higher than in bacteria and similar to levels around 100 pM reported in mammalian cells (Figure 1a, b) (Krämer, Reference Krämer2024; Lanquar et al., Reference Lanquar, Grossmann, Vinkenborg, Merkx, Thomine and Frommer2014; Qin et al., Reference Qin, Miranda, Stoddard, Dean, Galati and Palmer2013). However, the availability of only a single published study on a land plant to date, and the use of different methods limit the comparability with bacterial studies. Plant vacuoles, which contain ~100 μM Zn, constitute a large potential cellular reservoir for the dynamic entry of metal ions into, and removal from, the cytosolic metal buffer – a feature that differs strongly from many other organisms (Lanquar et al., Reference Lanquar, Grossmann, Vinkenborg, Merkx, Thomine and Frommer2014, Reference Lanquar, Ramos, Lelievre, Barbier-Brygoo, Krieger-Liszkay, Krämer and Thomine2010). Experimental procedures involving the destruction of plant cells inevitably permit the redistribution of metal cations among all accessible binding sites in aqueous suspensions or solutions and are thus unable to provide any information on Zn localization, binding or speciation in vivo.

Figure 2. Model of the metalation of Zn metalloproteins. (a–c) Expectations of cytosolic protein metalation under normal conditions (a), excess Zn conditions (b), and conditions of a more oxidized redox state, for example, under oxidative stress (c). Apo-metalloproteins (left) undergo metalation from the Zn buffer by associative ligand exchange (middle, shown for the ligand GSH as an example) to generate the Zn-bound forms (right, blue shapes) (a–c). The darker end of the arrows and the progressively darker shapes indicate the direction during metalation, whereby each step is reversible; important equilibria are emphasized by dotted arrows (a–c). Protein conformational changes can render the bound Zn solvent-inaccessible, removing it from the buffer (upper right blue shape in a, shown again in b and c). Red vertical arrows show the direction of changes when cytosolic Zn levels increase (b), and when cytosolic GSH is oxidized to GSSG (c), and red arrowheads emphasize that metalation processes are generally favoured (b, c). This is predicted to result in the binding of Zn2+ to labile binding sites on additional proteins (green shapes) including type III metalloproteins which can activate signalling and regulation (b, c). Note that a more oxidized redox state can also result in the formation of disulphide bridges among thiol groups of Zn-binding sites, thus strongly decreasing their affinity for Zn2+ (not shown).

5. Metal buffering in plant cells highlights that a more oxidized redox state can generate an internal burst in available Zn 2+

With low-millimolar concentrations, a major contribution of glutathione (GSH), γ-glutamyl-cysteinyl-glycine (γ-ECG), to the cytosolic metal buffer appears feasible (Figures 1a and 2a) (apparent pK d of the Zn(GS)2 complex ~8.1 at pH 7.7; Box 1.2) (Koffler et al., Reference Koffler, Bloem, Zellnig and Zechmann2013; Krezel & Maret, Reference Krezel and Maret2016; Meyer et al., Reference Meyer, May and Fricker2001). Plant metallothionein proteins, a family of small cysteine-rich proteins capable of metal binding, and other proteins containing surface thiols are likely to make notable contributions to the cytosolic metal buffer (Hassinen et al., Reference Hassinen, Tervahauta, Schat and Kärenlampi2011; Hübner & Haase, Reference Hübner and Haase2021). As a result of the preference of Zn for thiol-containing ligands including GSH, they are thought to contribute overproportionately to the intracellular buffering of Zn2+, compared to the buffering of Fe2+ and Mn2+, for example. We would expect that any decrease in total cytosolic thiol concentrations, either through their oxidation or through a decrease in total thiol levels, leads to increased buffered available cytosolic concentrations of Zn2+, similar to a situation in which excess Zn levels are present in the cytosol (Box 1.5, Figure 2ac). Under conditions of oxidative stress, we would thus expect at least a transient homoeostatic downregulation of known transcriptional Zn deficiency markers in Arabidopsis. Concordant with the transition to a more sufficient cellular Zn status, transcript levels of the bZIP19/bZIP23 target gene ZIP3 are downregulated in roots of wild-type Arabidopsis plants after 2 h of oxidative stress (Figure 1a) (Lehmann et al., Reference Lehmann, Schwarzländer, Obata, Sirikantaramas, Burow, Olsen and Laxa2009), as well as in GSH-deficient mutants by comparison to the wild type (Schnaubelt et al., Reference Schnaubelt, Queval, Dong, Diaz-Vivancos, Makgopa, Howell and Foyer2015). This highlights the potential relevance of changes in redox state for the homoeostasis of Zn in plants. Beyond this, transient increases in intracellular buffered available Zn2+ concentrations could act as a signal contributing to the regulation of a broader range of cellular processes by altering the functional state of hitherto unidentified type III metalloproteins through the binding of Zn2+ to facultative binding sites (Box 1.4, Figure 2ac). This possibility expands the physiological scope for possible Zn2+-dependent signalling, which could be triggered in plant cells through several processes. As is well-known, it could be initiated by the increased influx of Zn into the cytosol upon release from the vacuole or a sudden increase in extracellular bioavailable Zn levels (Figures 1a and 2b). Alternatively, it could be activated during episodes of a more oxidized redox state, which can result from cellular stress, dynamic changes in metabolism, or as a response to a variety of abiotic or biotic stimuli (Mittler et al., Reference Mittler, Zandalinas, Fichman and Van Breusegem2022) (Figure 2c). Beyond this, also a decrease in pH, predicted to result in the protonation of free electron pairs of important Zn ligands including GSH, could potentially lead to an increase in Zn2+ availability. Despite a growing body of literature in the animal field on signalling and regulatory roles of Zn2+ outside maintaining metal homoeostasis alone, they are yet to be experimentally examined in plants (Assunção, Reference Assunção2022; Clemens, Reference Clemens2022; Earley et al., Reference Earley, Mendoza, Tan and Kornfeld2021; Hübner & Haase, Reference Hübner and Haase2021; Krämer, Reference Krämer2024; Maret, Reference Maret2019).

Based on the stability constants of Zn complexes of phytochelatins (PCs), which increase with increasing lengths of the (γ-EC) n G peptide (n = 2–5), it was proposed that PC2 ((γ-EC)2G) contributes to the cytosolic metal buffer in plants cultivated under standard conditions (in the absence of a metal excess) (Luczkowski et al., Reference Luczkowski, Leszczynska, Watly, Clemens and Krezel2024). The authors proposed that the stability of Zn complexes with PC2 (apparent pK d ~7.3 at pH 7.4; Box 1.2), with PC2 levels of 5–30 nmol g−1 fresh biomass (i.e., up to around 30 μM in fresh tissues) in Arabidopsis roots, could contribute to cytosolic Zn buffering. Nicotianamine concentrations in Arabidopsis tissues are in a similar range as PC2 levels, and NA is thought to contribute to the cytosolic metal buffer (ca. 25–140 nmol g−1 fresh biomass (Klatte et al., Reference Klatte, Schuler, Wirtz, Fink-Straube, Hell and Bauer2009; Pianelli et al., Reference Pianelli, Mari, Marques, Lebrun and Czernic2005; Weber et al., Reference Weber, Harada, Vess, Roepenack-Lahaye and Clemens2004), pK d = 15.4 (von Wirén et al., Reference Von Wirén, Klair, Bansal, Briat, Khodr, Shioiri and Hider1999) and apparent pK d ~10.48 at pH 7.7 (Krezel & Maret, Reference Krezel and Maret2016)). Yet, we are presently lacking important information on the cytosolic concentrations of these low-molecular-mass chelators and their subcellular distribution between the cytosol, the vacuole and intracellular vesicles, for instance (Chao et al., Reference Chao, Wang, Chen, Zhang, Wang, Song and Chao2021; Haydon et al., Reference Haydon, Kawachi, Wirtz, Hillmer, Hell and Krämer2012; Song et al., Reference Song, Park, Mendoza-Cozatl, Suter-Grotemeyer, Shim, Hortensteiner and Martinoia2010).

Plant cells must also accomplish and maintain protein metalation in cellular compartments other than the cytosol. Work in mammalian model systems suggested buffered available Zn2+ concentrations of 0.3 nM in mitochondria and >5 nM in the endoplasmatic reticulum (ER) (Chabosseau et al., Reference Chabosseau, Tuncay, Meur, Bellomo, Hessels, Hughes and Rutter2014; Clemens, Reference Clemens2022). The latter is consistent with a more oxidized redox state of GSH in the ER than in the cytosol of plant cells (Schwarzländer et al., Reference Schwarzländer, Fricker, Müller, Marty, Brach, Novak and Meyer2008). Under Zn deficiency, the possibility of maintaining higher buffered available Zn2+ concentrations in the ER may help to maintain a rate of root-to-shoot Zn flux critical for survival (see below).

6. A brief overview of Zn acquisition and homoeostasis in Arabidopsis

The uptake of Zn into the root symplasm of Arabidopsis and other plants is thought to occur via redundantly acting Zn2+ transporters of the Zn-regulated transporter, IRT-like protein (ZIP) family, which are capable of mediating cellular Zn uptake when produced in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Figure 1a) (Grotz et al., Reference Grotz, Fox, Connolly, Park, Guerinot and Eide1998; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Lee, Ricachenevsky, Punshon, Tappero, Salt and Guerinot2021). Yet, this model is not unequivocally supported by reverse genetic evidence. An increased vacuolar accumulation of Zn in a quadruple irt3 zip4 zip6 zip9 mutant and irt3 zip4 zip6/zip9 triple mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana implies additional or other transporters in root Zn uptake, and it could alternatively reflect a role of these transporters in the remobilization of Zn from pools stored in the vacuoles of root cortex cells (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Lee, Ricachenevsky, Punshon, Tappero, Salt and Guerinot2021; Robe et al., Reference Robe, Lefebvre-Legendre, Cleard and Barberon2024). Additional unidentified Zn transporters of plants might have dual substrates or transport Zn complexes. For example, the high-affinity inorganic phosphate uptake system PHO84 of S. cerevisiae was proposed to additionally mediate the uptake of Mn, Zn and other metals (Jensen et al., Reference Jensen, Ajua-Alemanji and Culotta2003). The closest plant homologues of ScPHO84 are in the phosphate transporter family of major facilitator superfamily proteins (Nino-Gonzalez et al., Reference Nino-Gonzalez, Novo-Uzal, Richardson, Barros and Duque2019).

Zinc transport into vacuoles is mediated by metal transport/tolerance protein 1 (MTP1) and MTP3 of the so-called cation diffusion facilitator family, as well as heavy metal ATPase 3 (HMA3; note that Col-0 is an hma3 mutant) (Figure 1a) (Arrivault et al., Reference Arrivault, Senger and Krämer2006; Desbrosses-Fonrouge et al., Reference Desbrosses-Fonrouge, Voigt, Schröder, Arrivault, Thomine and Krämer2005; Morel et al., Reference Morel, Crouzet, Gravot, Auroy, Leonhardt, Vavasseur and Richaud2009). MTP1 appears to be highly expressed in growing tips, whereas both MTP3 and HMA3 are upregulated in the roots of plants exposed to Fe deficiency and excess Zn. Transport of nicotianamine into the vacuoles via zinc-induced facilitator 1 (ZIF1) enhances vacuolar Zn storage and can contribute to immobilizing Zn in the roots (Haydon & Cobbett, Reference Haydon and Cobbett2007; Haydon et al., Reference Haydon, Kawachi, Wirtz, Hillmer, Hell and Krämer2012). The function of ZIF1 illustrates the principle of ‘Zn trapping’ through the localized accumulation of a chelator, which can have a major impact on Zn partitioning within the plant. With similar effects, silicates, phosphates and polyphosphates such as phytate (inositol hexakisphosphate, IP6), for example, have been implicated in the formation of Zn precipitates, mostly extracellularly and inside vacuoles (Bouain et al., Reference Bouain, Shahzad, Rouached, Khan, Berthomieu, Abdelly and Rouached2014; Neumann & zur Nieden, Reference Neumann and zur Nieden2001).

ZIF1 transcript levels respond in a similar manner as those of MTP3 and HMA3. Root cortex cells appear to be important in Zn storage and immobilization based on the localization of promoter activities of HMA3, MTP3 and ZIF1. Only the Fe deficiency responsiveness of HMA3 and MTP3, but not that of ZIF1 transcript levels, depends on upstream regulator of IRT1 (URI) and Fe deficiency-induced transcription factor 1 (FIT1), central transcriptional activators of Fe deficiency responses (Colangelo & Guerinot, Reference Colangelo and Guerinot2004; Kim et al., Reference Kim, LaCroix, Gerber and Guerinot2019; Mai et al., Reference Mai, Pateyron and Bauer2016). The similarities between the responses of roots to excess Zn and Fe deficiency highlight the ability of Zn to interfere with Fe nutrition and the relevance of the high-affinity Fe uptake system IRT1 for the influx of Zn2+ into root cells as a secondary substrate (Figure 1a). Consistent with the disruption of Fe nutrition by exposure to excess Zn, brutus-like 1 (btsl1) btsl2 double mutants are more Zn-tolerant than wild-type Arabidopsis plants. This has been attributed to aspects of a general upregulation of Fe deficiency responses in these mutants (Stanton et al., Reference Stanton, Rodriguez-Celma, Krämer, Sanders and Balk2023).

Nicotianamine, when not sequestered in vacuoles, appears to be important in the radial symplastic cell-to-cell movement of Zn in roots towards the stele, where Zn2+ cations are exported into the xylem by the metal pumps HMA4 and HMA2 (Figure 1a) (Deinlein et al., Reference Deinlein, Weber, Schmidt, Rensch, Trampczynska, Hansen and Clemens2012; Haydon et al., Reference Haydon, Kawachi, Wirtz, Hillmer, Hell and Krämer2012; Hussain et al., Reference Hussain, Haydon, Wang, Wong, Sherson, Young and Cobbett2004). These two metal pumps act partially redundantly. Whereas HMA4 transcripts are constitutively present in A. thaliana roots at low levels, the levels of HMA2 transcripts are upregulated under Zn deficiency (Sinclair et al., Reference Sinclair, Senger, Talke, Cobbett, Haydon and Krämer2018). Compared to A. thaliana, strongly elevated HMA4 transcript levels in Arabidopsis halleri are necessary for naturally selected Zn hyperaccumulation, the accumulation of extraordinarily high Zn levels in shoots of this species (Hanikenne et al., Reference Hanikenne, Talke, Haydon, Lanz, Nolte, Motte and Krämer2008; Krämer, Reference Krämer2010). The high rates of HMA4-dependent Zn2+ export from the root symplasm into the xylem were shown to cause the secondary homoeostatic upregulation of the levels of Zn deficiency-responsive bZIP19/bZIP23 target transcripts in roots of A. halleri, presumably as a result of Zn depletion in root cells (Hanikenne et al., Reference Hanikenne, Talke, Haydon, Lanz, Nolte, Motte and Krämer2008). This is a second example of how changing a single process in the Zn homoeostasis network can strongly affect Zn fluxes in plants (see ZIF1 above).

ZIP family transporters are thought to contribute to xylem unloading in the shoot by mediating Zn uptake into the adjacent cells. The molecular mechanisms involved in the distribution of Zn across the leaf blade are poorly understood. HMA4 is likely to contribute to this at least in A. halleri, as well as in A. thaliana under specific conditions such as pathogen attack, in the context of elemental defences against biotic stress (Escudero et al., Reference Escudero, Sánchez, Abreu, Sopeña-Torres, Makarovsky-Saavedra, Bernal and Jordá2022; Hanikenne et al., Reference Hanikenne, Talke, Haydon, Lanz, Nolte, Motte and Krämer2008; Krämer, Reference Krämer2024).

Zn deficiency responses are regulated in a cell-autonomous manner by the Zn-sensing transcription factors bZIP19 and bZIP23 (Figure 1a), which may also act as heterodimers and have partially redundant functions (Assunção, Reference Assunção2022; Kimura et al., Reference Kimura, Vaattovaara, Ohshita, Yokoyama, Yoshida, Hui and Fukao2023; Sinclair et al., Reference Sinclair, Senger, Talke, Cobbett, Haydon and Krämer2018). Targets with known roles in Zn homoeostasis are primarily subsets of ZIP transporter- and nicotianamine synthase-encoding genes (Assunção et al., Reference Assunção, Herrero, Lin, Huettel, Talukdar, Smaczniak and Aarts2010). In addition, there is a systemically regulated Zn deficiency response in roots controlled by the Zn status of rosette leaves, which includes the upregulation of transcript levels of MTP2 and HMA2 (Sinclair et al., Reference Sinclair, Senger, Talke, Cobbett, Haydon and Krämer2018). Both of the encoded proteins contribute to enhancing root-to-shoot Zn flux. It appears that MTP2 acts by transporting Zn2+ into the ER (Figure 1a), suggesting that radial cell-to-cell transport of Zn in roots occurs within desmotubules under Zn deficiency, which will require further study.

Both HMA2 and HMA4 also act in the export of Zn from the maternal seed coat for its translocation to the developing embryo (Olsen et al., Reference Olsen, Hansen, Larue, Osterberg, Hoffmann, Liesche and Palmgren2016). MTP2 promoter activity and transcripts are also found in developing seeds of Zn-deficient plants. In addition to ZIP family proteins, natural resistance associated macrophage protein (NRAMP) and yellow stripe-like (YSL) family proteins are candidate membrane transporters for contributing to the remobilization of Zn2+ from vacuoles or other cellular compartments (Figure 1a), and also for mediating Zn influx across the plasma membrane. HMA1 is thought to export Zn from the chloroplast stroma to protect chloroplasts from Zn toxicity (Figure 1a) (Kim et al., Reference Kim, Choi, Segami, Cho, Martinoia, Maeshima and Lee2009). Although a number of critical Zn metalloproteins localize to plastids and mitochondria, we do not presently know through which transporters Zn enters these organelles.

Basal Zn tolerance (Clemens, Reference Clemens2001) involves Zn-binding PCs ((γ-EC) n G, n = 2–11). PCs are synthesized from GSH by PC synthase enzymes, which are activated by metal binding (Tennstedt et al., Reference Tennstedt, Peisker, Böttcher, Trampczynska and Clemens2009). The proposed roles of cysteine-rich extracellular plant defensins in Zn-binding and Zn tolerance in plants are less well understood (Shahzad et al., Reference Shahzad, Ranwez, Fizames, Marques, Le Martret, Alassimone and Gosti2013). Apoplastically localized cysteine-rich defensin-like (DEFL) proteins have been implicated in root Zn deficiency responses (Kimura et al., Reference Kimura, Vaattovaara, Ohshita, Yokoyama, Yoshida, Hui and Fukao2023; Niehs et al., Reference Niehs, Rajniak, Johnson, Wengier and Sattely2024). DEFL202, 203 and 206208 are transcriptionally upregulated under Zn deficiency and – different from the wild type – defl202 defl203 double mutants fail to attenuate root growth under Zn deficiency (Kimura et al., Reference Kimura, Vaattovaara, Ohshita, Yokoyama, Yoshida, Hui and Fukao2023).

Arabidopsis de-etiolated by zinc (dez, or trichome birefringence, tbr) and overly zinc sensitive 2 (ozs2, or pectin methylesterase 3, pme3) mutants are Zn hypersensitive, and this was demonstrated to be related to reduced contents or accessibility of de-methyl esterified pectin in the cell wall (Sinclair et al., Reference Sinclair, Larue, Bonk, Khan, Castillo-Michel, Stein and Krämer2017; Weber et al., Reference Weber, Deinlein, Fischer, Rogowski, Geimer, Tenhaken and Clemens2013). The extracellular binding of Zn2+ to cell walls thus contributes to basal Zn tolerance. Recently identified natural variants of TBR may relate to this, but we presently do not know whether this natural genetic variation is associated with variation in bioavailable Zn levels in the soils of origin of these Arabidopsis accessions (Zhong et al., Reference Zhong, Zhang, Wei, Platre, He, Zhang and Busch2024). The current status of knowledge suggests that the main proteins and processes of Zn homoeostasis are conserved across flowering plants, including also rice, for example (Stanton et al., Reference Stanton, Sanders, Krämer and Podar2022).

In summary, there is plenty of scope for research towards an improved understanding of Zn homoeostasis in plants. Future research will address the nature, abundance and subcellular localization of Zn metalloproteins, protein metalation, the cellular dynamics of Zn availability, as well as aim to identify Zn2+-sensing proteins and their roles in Zn2+-dependent signalling and regulation, both within and beyond Zn homoeostasis alone. In addition to the role of Zn in its metalloproteome, Zn can be co-opted for other functions such as elemental defence (see Krämer, Reference Krämer2024). Scientific progress in plant Zn biology will contribute to increasing yield, quality and stress resilience of crops.

Data availability statement

The contents of this publication are based on published data, and the corresponding references are cited. No coding was involved.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank all colleagues in the metals field for numerous discussions and an intense exchange of ideas and opinions over many years. The author would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for reading the manuscript carefully and for making thoughtful suggestions. The author would like to apologize to all colleagues whose work is not cited here due to space restrictions.

Author contributions

Ute Krämer conceived and designed the text, tables and figures, analysed data and wrote the article.

Funding statement

This work received funding from the European Research Commission (ERC-AdG 788380 LEAP EXTREME); the German Research Council (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, TRR 341 Plant Ecological Genetics grant No. 456082119, RTG 2341 MiCon grant No. 321933041 and Individual Research Grant No. 5453631); as well as financial support for exchange and discussion from the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (Cost Action PLANTMETALS, CA19116).

Competing interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2025.4.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Ingo Dreyer

References

Alloway, B. J. (2009). Soil factors associated with zinc deficiency in crops and humans. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 31(5), 537548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-009-9255-4 Google ScholarPubMed
Andreini, C., Banci, L., Bertini, I., & Rosato, A. (2006). Zinc through the three domains of life. Journal of Proteome Research, 5(11), 31733178. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr0603699 Google ScholarPubMed
Andreini, C., Bertini, I., & Rosato, A. (2009). Metalloproteomes: A bioinformatic approach. Accounts of Chemical Research, 42(10), 14711479. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900015x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arrivault, S., Senger, T., & Krämer, U. (2006). The Arabidopsis metal tolerance protein AtMTP3 maintains metal homeostasis by mediating Zn exclusion from the shoot under Fe deficiency and Zn oversupply. The Plant Journal, 46(5), 861879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02746.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assunção, A. G. L. (2022). The F-bZIP-regulated Zn deficiency response in land plants. Planta, 256(6), 108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-04019-6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assunção, A. G. L., Herrero, E., Lin, Y.-F., Huettel, B., Talukdar, S., Smaczniak, C.,…Aarts, M. G. M. (2010). Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors bZIP19 and bZIP23 regulate the adaptation to zinc deficiency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 107(22), 10296. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004788107 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouain, N., Shahzad, Z., Rouached, A., Khan, G. A., Berthomieu, P., Abdelly, C.,…Rouached, H. (2014). Phosphate and zinc transport and signalling in plants: Toward a better understanding of their homeostasis interaction. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(20), 57255741. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru314 Google Scholar
Chabosseau, P., Tuncay, E., Meur, G., Bellomo, E. A., Hessels, A., Hughes, S.,…Rutter, G. A. (2014). Mitochondrial and ER-targeted eCALWY probes reveal high levels of free Zn2+ . ACS Chemical Biology, 9(9), 21112120. https://doi.org/10.1021/cb5004064 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, Z. F., Wang, Y. L., Chen, Y. Y., Zhang, C. Y., Wang, P. Y., Song, T.,…Chao, D. Y. (2021). NPF transporters in synaptic-like vesicles control delivery of iron and copper to seeds. Science Advances, 7(36), eabh2450. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh2450 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clemens, S. (2001). Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis. Planta, 212(4), 475486. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11525504 Google ScholarPubMed
Clemens, S. (2022). The cell biology of zinc. Journal of Experimental Botany, 73(6), 16881698. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab481 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colangelo, E. P., & Guerinot, M. L. (2004). The essential basic helix-loop-helix protein FIT1 is required for the iron deficiency response. Plant Cell, 16(12), 3400. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.104.024315 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costello, L. C., Fenselau, C. C., & Franklin, R. B. (2011). Evidence for operation of the direct zinc ligand exchange mechanism for trafficking, transport, and reactivity of zinc in mammalian cells. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 105(5), 589599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2011.02.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deinlein, U., Weber, M., Schmidt, H., Rensch, S., Trampczynska, A., Hansen, T. H.,…Clemens, S. (2012). Elevated nicotianamine levels in Arabidopsis halleri roots play a key role in zinc hyperaccumulation. Plant Cell, 24(2), 708723. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.095000 Google ScholarPubMed
Desbrosses-Fonrouge, A. G., Voigt, K., Schröder, A., Arrivault, S., Thomine, S., & Krämer, U. (2005). Arabidopsis thaliana MTP1 is a Zn transporter in the vacuolar membrane which mediates Zn detoxification and drives leaf Zn accumulation. FEBS Letters, 579(19), 41654174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.06.046 Google ScholarPubMed
Dubeaux, G., Neveu, J., Zelazny, E., & Vert, G. (2018). Metal sensing by the IRT1 transporter-receptor orchestrates its own degradation and plant metal nutrition. Molecular Cell, 69(6), 953964.e955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.009 Google ScholarPubMed
Earley, B. J., Mendoza, A. D., Tan, C. H., & Kornfeld, K. (2021). Zinc homeostasis and signaling in the roundworm C. elegans . Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Molecular Cell Research, 1868(1), 118882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118882 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ernst, W. H. O. (1974). Schwermetallvegetation der Erde. Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Escudero, V., Sánchez, D. F., Abreu, I., Sopeña-Torres, S., Makarovsky-Saavedra, N., Bernal, M.,…Jordá, L. (2022). Arabidopsis thaliana Zn2+-efflux ATPases HMA2 and HMA4 are required for resistance to the necrotrophic fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina BMM. Journal of Experimental Botany, 73(1), 339350. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, A. W., Clough, S. E., Aki, Z., Young, T. R., Clarke, A. R., & Robinson, N. J. (2022a). Metalation calculators for E. coli strain JM109 (DE3): Aerobic, anaerobic, and hydrogen peroxide exposed cells cultured in LB media. Metallomics, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.1093/mtomcs/mfac058 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, A. W., Osman, D., & Robinson, N. J. (2014). Metal preferences and metallation. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 289(41), 2809528103. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R114.588145 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, A. W., Young, T. R., Chivers, P. T., & Robinson, N. J. (2022b). Protein metalation in biology. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 66, 102095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.102095 Google ScholarPubMed
Fraústo da Silva, J. J. R., & Williams, R. J. P. (2001). The biological chemistry of the elements (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Guerrero, M., Escudero, V., Saez, A., & Tejada-Jimenez, M. (2016). Transition metal transport in plants and associated endosymbionts: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01088 Google ScholarPubMed
Grotz, N., Fox, T., Connolly, E., Park, W., Guerinot, M. L., & Eide, D. (1998). Identification of a family of zinc transporter genes from Arabidopsis that respond to zinc deficiency. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 95(12), 72207224. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.12.7220 Google ScholarPubMed
Hanikenne, M., Talke, I. N., Haydon, M. J., Lanz, C., Nolte, A., Motte, P.,…Krämer, U. (2008). Evolution of metal hyperaccumulation required cis-regulatory changes and triplication of HMA4 . Nature, 453(7193), 391395. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06877 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassinen, V. H., Tervahauta, A. I., Schat, H., & Kärenlampi, S. O. (2011). Plant metallothioneins – Metal chelators with ROS scavenging activity? Plant Biology, 13(2), 225232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00398.x Google ScholarPubMed
Haydon, M. J., & Cobbett, C. S. (2007). A novel major facilitator superfamily protein at the tonoplast influences zinc tolerance and accumulation in Arabidopsis . Plant Physiology, 143(4), 17051719. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.092015 Google ScholarPubMed
Haydon, M. J., Kawachi, M., Wirtz, M., Hillmer, S., Hell, R., & Krämer, U. (2012). Vacuolar nicotianamine has critical and distinct roles under iron deficiency and for zinc sequestration in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell, 24(2), 724737. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.095042 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinz, U., Kiefer, M., Tholey, A., & Adolph, H. W. (2005). On the competition for available zinc. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 280(5), 31973207. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M409425200 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hübner, C., & Haase, H. (2021). Interactions of zinc- and redox-signaling pathways. Redox Biology, 41, 101916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2021.101916 Google ScholarPubMed
Hussain, D., Haydon, M. J., Wang, Y., Wong, E., Sherson, S. M., Young, J.,…Cobbett, C. S. (2004). P-type ATPase heavy metal transporters with roles in essential zinc homeostasis in Arabidopsis . Plant Cell, 16(5), 13271339. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.020487 Google ScholarPubMed
Jensen, L. T., Ajua-Alemanji, M., & Culotta, V. C. (2003). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae high affinity phosphate transporter encoded by PHO84 also functions in manganese homeostasis. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(43), 4203642040. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M307413200 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S. A., LaCroix, I. S., Gerber, S. A., & Guerinot, M. L. (2019). The iron deficiency response in Arabidopsis thaliana requires the phosphorylated transcription factor URI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 116(50), 2493324942. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916892116 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, Y. Y., Choi, H., Segami, S., Cho, H. T., Martinoia, E., Maeshima, M., & Lee, Y. (2009). AtHMA1 contributes to the detoxification of excess Zn(II) in Arabidopsis . Plant Journal, 58(5), 737753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03818.x Google Scholar
Kimura, S., Vaattovaara, A., Ohshita, T., Yokoyama, K., Yoshida, K., Hui, A.,…Fukao, Y. (2023). Zinc deficiency-induced defensin-like proteins are involved in the inhibition of root growth in Arabidopsis . Plant Journal, 115(4), 10711083. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16281 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klatte, M., Schuler, M., Wirtz, M., Fink-Straube, C., Hell, R., & Bauer, P. (2009). The analysis of Arabidopsis nicotianamine synthase mutants reveals functions for nicotianamine in seed iron loading and iron deficiency responses. Plant Physiology, 150(1), 257271. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.136374 Google ScholarPubMed
Kmiec, B., Teixeira, P. F., Berntsson, R. P., Murcha, M. W., Branca, R. M., Radomiljac, J. D.,…Glaser, E. (2013). Organellar oligopeptidase (OOP) provides a complementary pathway for targeting peptide degradation in mitochondria and chloroplasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 110(40), E3761–3769. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1307637110 Google ScholarPubMed
Koffler, B. E., Bloem, E., Zellnig, G., & Zechmann, B. (2013). High resolution imaging of subcellular glutathione concentrations by quantitative immunoelectron microscopy in different leaf areas of Arabidopsis . Micron, 45, 119128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2012.11.006 Google ScholarPubMed
Krämer, U. (2010). Metal hyperaccumulation in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 61, 517534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112156 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krämer, U. (2024). Metal homeostasis in land plants: A perpetual balancing act beyond the fulfilment of metalloproteome cofactor demands. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 75(1), 2765. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-070623-105324 Google ScholarPubMed
Krezel, A., & Maret, W. (2016). The biological inorganic chemistry of zinc ions. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 611, 319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2016.04.010 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanquar, V., Grossmann, G., Vinkenborg, J. L., Merkx, M., Thomine, S., & Frommer, W. B. (2014). Dynamic imaging of cytosolic zinc in Arabidopsis roots combining FRET sensors and RootChip technology. New Phytologist, 202(1), 198208. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12652 Google ScholarPubMed
Lanquar, V., Ramos, M. S., Lelievre, F., Barbier-Brygoo, H., Krieger-Liszkay, A., Krämer, U., & Thomine, S. (2010). Export of vacuolar manganese by AtNRAMP3 and AtNRAMP4 is required for optimal photosynthesis and growth under manganese deficiency. Plant Physiology, 152(4), 19861999. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.150946 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S., Lee, J., Ricachenevsky, F. K., Punshon, T., Tappero, R., Salt, D. E., & Guerinot, M. L. (2021). Redundant roles of four ZIP family members in zinc homeostasis and seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Journal, 108(4), 11621173. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15506 Google ScholarPubMed
Lehmann, M., Schwarzländer, M., Obata, T., Sirikantaramas, S., Burow, M., Olsen, C. E.,…Laxa, M. (2009). The metabolic response of Arabidopsis roots to oxidative stress is distinct from that of heterotrophic cells in culture and highlights a complex relationship between the levels of transcripts, metabolites, and flux. Molecular Plant, 2(3), 390406. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssn080 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilay, G. H., Castro, P. H., Campilho, A., & Assunção, A. G. L. (2018). The Arabidopsis bZIP19 and bZIP23 activity requires zinc deficiency – Insight on regulation from complementation lines. Frontiers in Plant Sciences, 9, 1955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01955 Google ScholarPubMed
Lilay, G. H., Persson, D. P., Castro, P. H., Liao, F., Alexander, R. D., Aarts, M. G. M., & Assunção, A. G. L. (2021). Arabidopsis bZIP19 and bZIP23 act as zinc sensors to control plant zinc status. Nature Plants, 7(2), 137143. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-00856-7 Google ScholarPubMed
Luczkowski, M., Leszczynska, W., Watly, J., Clemens, S., & Krezel, A. (2024). Phytochelatins bind Zn(II) with micro- to picomolar affinities without the formation of binuclear complexes, exhibiting zinc buffering and muffling rather than storing functions. Inorganic Chemistry, 63(24), 1091510931. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c01707 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mai, H. J., Pateyron, S., & Bauer, P. (2016). Iron homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana: Transcriptomic analyses reveal novel FIT-regulated genes, iron deficiency marker genes and functional gene networks. BMC Plant Biology, 16(1), 211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0899-9 Google ScholarPubMed
Maret, W. (2019). The redox biology of redox-inert zinc ions. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 134, 311326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.01.006 Google ScholarPubMed
Marschner, H., & Marschner, P. (2012). Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants (3rd ed.). Elsevier/Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mergner, J., Frejno, M., List, M., Papacek, M., Chen, X., Chaudhary, A.,…Küster, B. (2020a). Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the Arabidopsis proteome. Nature, 579(7799), 409414. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2094-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mergner, J., Frejno, M., Messerer, M., Lang, D., Samaras, P., Wilhelm, M.,…Küster, B. (2020b). Proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of aerial organ development in Arabidopsis . Science Data, 7(1), 334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00678-w CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, A. J., May, M. J., & Fricker, M. (2001). Quantitative in vivo measurement of glutathione in Arabidopsis cells. Plant Journal, 27(1), 6778. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01071.x Google ScholarPubMed
Mittler, R., Zandalinas, S. I., Fichman, Y., & Van Breusegem, F. (2022). Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 23(10), 663679. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-022-00499-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morel, M. l., Crouzet, J., Gravot, A., Auroy, P., Leonhardt, N., Vavasseur, A., & Richaud, P. (2009). AtHMA3, a P1B-ATPase allowing Cd/Zn/Co/Pb vacuolar storage in Arabidopsis.  Plant Physiology, 149(2), 894904. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.130294 Google ScholarPubMed
Neumann, D., & zur Nieden, U. (2001). Silicon and heavy metal tolerance of higher plants. Phytochemistry, 56(7), 685692. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9422(00)00472-6 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niehs, S. P., Rajniak, J., Johnson, A., Wengier, D. L., & Sattely, E. S. (2024). Zinc-starved Brassicaceae plants secrete peptides that induce root expansion. bioRxiv, 2024.2006.2011.598559. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.11.598559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nino-Gonzalez, M., Novo-Uzal, E., Richardson, D. N., Barros, P. M., & Duque, P. (2019). More transporters, more substrates: The Arabidopsis major facilitator superfamily revisited. Molecular Plant, 12(9), 11821202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2019.07.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noulas, C., Tziouvalekas, M., & Karyotis, T. (2018). Zinc in soils, water and food crops. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 49, 252260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2018.02.009 Google ScholarPubMed
Olsen, L. I., Hansen, T. H., Larue, C., Osterberg, J. T., Hoffmann, R. D., Liesche, J.,…Palmgren, M. (2016). Mother-plant-mediated pumping of zinc into the developing seed. Nature Plants, 2(5), 16036. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.36 Google ScholarPubMed
Osman, D., & Robinson, N. J. (2023). Protein metalation in a nutshell. FEBS Letters, 597(1), 141150. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.14500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Outten, C. E., & O'Halloran, T. V. (2001). Femtomolar sensitivity of metalloregulatory proteins controlling zinc homeostasis. Science, 292(5526), 24882492. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1060331 Google ScholarPubMed
Pasquini, M., Grosjean, N., Hixson, K. K., Nicora, C. D., Yee, E. F., Lipton, M.,…Blaby-Haas, C. E. (2022). Zng1 is a GTP-dependent zinc transferase needed for activation of methionine aminopeptidase. Cell Reports, 39(7), 110834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110834 Google ScholarPubMed
Pianelli, K., Mari, S., Marques, L., Lebrun, M., & Czernic, P. (2005). Nicotianamine over-accumulation confers resistance to nickel in Arabidopsis thaliana . Transgenic Research, 14(5), 739748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-005-7159-3 Google ScholarPubMed
Qin, Y., Miranda, J. G., Stoddard, C. I., Dean, K. M., Galati, D. F., & Palmer, A. E. (2013). Direct comparison of a genetically encoded sensor and small molecule indicator: Implications for quantification of cytosolic Zn(2+). ACS Chemical Biology, 8(11), 23662371. https://doi.org/10.1021/cb4003859 Google ScholarPubMed
Robe, K., Lefebvre-Legendre, L., Cleard, F., & Barberon, M. (2024). Four ZIPs contribute to Zn, Fe, Cu and Mn acquisition at the outer root domain. bioRxiv, 2024.2010.2031.621270. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.31.621270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnaubelt, D., Queval, G., Dong, Y., Diaz-Vivancos, P., Makgopa, M. E., Howell, G.,…Foyer, C. H. (2015). Low glutathione regulates gene expression and the redox potentials of the nucleus and cytosol in Arabidopsis thaliana . Plant Cell Environment, 38(2), 266279. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12252 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarzländer, M., Fricker, M. D., Müller, C., Marty, L., Brach, T., Novak, J.,…Meyer, A. J. (2008). Confocal imaging of glutathione redox potential in living plant cells. Journal of Microscopy, 231(2), 299316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02030.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahzad, Z., Ranwez, V., Fizames, C., Marques, L., Le Martret, B., Alassimone, J.,…Gosti, F. (2013). Plant Defensin type 1 (PDF1): Protein promiscuity and expression variation within the Arabidopsis genus shed light on zinc tolerance acquisition in Arabidopsis halleri . New Phytologist, 200(3), 820833. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12396 Google ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, S. A., & Krämer, U. (2012). The zinc homeostasis network of land plants. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1823(9), 15531567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.05.016 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, S. A., Larue, C., Bonk, L., Khan, A., Castillo-Michel, H., Stein, R. J.,…Krämer, U. (2017). Etiolated Seedling development requires repression of photomorphogenesis by a small cell-wall-derived dark signal. Current Biology, 27(22), 34033418 e3407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, S. A., Senger, T., Talke, I. N., Cobbett, C. S., Haydon, M. J., & Krämer, U. (2018). Systemic upregulation of MTP2- and HMA2-mediated Zn partitioning to the shoot supplements local Zn deficiency responses. Plant Cell, 30(10), 24632479. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.18.00207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, W. Y., Park, J., Mendoza-Cozatl, D. G., Suter-Grotemeyer, M., Shim, D., Hortensteiner, S.,…Martinoia, E. (2010). Arsenic tolerance in Arabidopsis is mediated by two ABCC-type phytochelatin transporters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America, 107(49), 2118721192. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013964107 Google ScholarPubMed
Stanton, C., Rodriguez-Celma, J., Krämer, U., Sanders, D., & Balk, J. (2023). BRUTUS-LIKE (BTSL) E3 ligase-mediated fine-tuning of Fe regulation negatively affects Zn tolerance of Arabidopsis . Journal of Experimental Botany, 74(18), 57675782. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erad243 Google ScholarPubMed
Stanton, C., Sanders, D., Krämer, U., & Podar, D. (2022). Zinc in plants: Integrating homeostasis and biofortification. Molecular Plant, 15(1), 6585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2021.12.008 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, J. M. (1994). 9 – Causes of soil nutrient heterogeneity at different scales. In Caldwell, M. M. & Pearcy, R. W. (Eds.), exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants (pp. 255284). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-155070-7.50014-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennstedt, P., Peisker, D., Böttcher, C., Trampczynska, A., & Clemens, S. (2009). Phytochelatin synthesis is essential for the detoxification of excess zinc and contributes significantly to the accumulation of zinc. Plant Physiology, 149(2), 938948. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.127472 Google Scholar
Thiébaut, N., & Hanikenne, M. (2022). Zinc deficiency responses: Bridging the gap between Arabidopsis and dicotyledonous crops. Journal of Experimental Botany, 73(6), 16991716. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab491 Google Scholar
Von Wirén, N., Klair, S., Bansal, S., Briat, J.-F., Khodr, H., Shioiri, T.,…Hider, R. C. (1999). Nicotianamine chelates both FeIII and FeII. Implications for metal transport in plants. Plant Physiology, 119(3), 11071114. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.119.3.1107 Google Scholar
Weber, M., Deinlein, U., Fischer, S., Rogowski, M., Geimer, S., Tenhaken, R., & Clemens, S. (2013). A mutation in the Arabidopsis thaliana cell wall biosynthesis gene pectin methylesterase 3 as well as its aberrant expression cause hypersensitivity specifically to Zn. Plant Journal, 76(1), 151164. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12279 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, M., Harada, E., Vess, C., Roepenack-Lahaye, E., & Clemens, S. (2004). Comparative microarray analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis halleri roots identifies nicotianamine synthase, a ZIP transporter and other genes as potential metal hyperaccumulation factors. Plant Journal, 37(2), 269281. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01960.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. J. (2012). Zinc in evolution. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 111, 104109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2012.01.004 Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, H., & Krämer, U. (2018). Differential diel translation of transcripts with roles in the transfer and utilization of iron-sulfur clusters in Arabidopsis . Frontiers in Plant Sciences, 9, 1641. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01641Google ScholarPubMed
Zhong, K., Zhang, P., Wei, X., Platre, M. P., He, W., Zhang, L.,…Busch, W. (2024). Natural variation of TBR confers plant zinc toxicity tolerance through root cell wall pectin methylesterification. Nature Communication, 15(1), 5823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50106-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Cellular zinc homoeostasis in plants. (a) Cellular Zn homoeostasis and the cytosolic Zn buffer. (b) Cytosolic buffered available metal cation concentrations in Salmonella enterica (grey line around symbols) and in Arabidopsis thaliana (for Zn2+ only, green line around symbol). [ZnIIb], the buffered available Zn2+ concentration, is dependent on the metal buffer. Cytosolic Zn is present in the form of Zn complexes of low-molecular-mass ligands, such as glutathione (GSH) to form [Zn(GS)2], nicotianamine ([ZnNA]), phytochelatins ([ZnPC]), histidine ([ZnHis]) (ligand biosynthesis not shown), as well as Zn-binding sites of type I Zn metalloproteins (not shown) and metallothionein (MT) (a). Dashed arrow indicates the movement of mRNAs (drawn line ending in AAA, with names) of bZIP19/23 target genes out of the nucleus under Zn deficiency (a). C, plastid; Cit, citrate; ER, endoplasmatic reticulum; G, Golgi apparatus; L, ligand forming Zn complex; M, mitochondrium; P, peroxisome; PD: plasmodesma; X, phosphate or other anion forming Zn-precipitates. Yellow stripe-like (YSL) and natural resistance associated macrophage protein (NRAMP) family proteins can transport Zn, but critical roles in Zn homoeostasis have not yet been demonstrated for them in Arabidopsis. They might alternatively mediate Zn influx into the cytosol across other membranes, such as the plasma membrane. See text for other abbreviations and descriptions; more details have been described elsewhere (Sinclair & Krämer, 2012).

Figure 1

Table 1 The top 15 most abundant Zn proteins in leaves of Arabidopsis

Figure 2

Figure 2. Model of the metalation of Zn metalloproteins. (a–c) Expectations of cytosolic protein metalation under normal conditions (a), excess Zn conditions (b), and conditions of a more oxidized redox state, for example, under oxidative stress (c). Apo-metalloproteins (left) undergo metalation from the Zn buffer by associative ligand exchange (middle, shown for the ligand GSH as an example) to generate the Zn-bound forms (right, blue shapes) (a–c). The darker end of the arrows and the progressively darker shapes indicate the direction during metalation, whereby each step is reversible; important equilibria are emphasized by dotted arrows (a–c). Protein conformational changes can render the bound Zn solvent-inaccessible, removing it from the buffer (upper right blue shape in a, shown again in b and c). Red vertical arrows show the direction of changes when cytosolic Zn levels increase (b), and when cytosolic GSH is oxidized to GSSG (c), and red arrowheads emphasize that metalation processes are generally favoured (b, c). This is predicted to result in the binding of Zn2+ to labile binding sites on additional proteins (green shapes) including type III metalloproteins which can activate signalling and regulation (b, c). Note that a more oxidized redox state can also result in the formation of disulphide bridges among thiol groups of Zn-binding sites, thus strongly decreasing their affinity for Zn2+ (not shown).

Author comment: Changing paradigms for the micronutrient zinc, a known protein cofactor, as a signal relaying also cellular redox state — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Dale,

Dear Ingo,

Very sorry for submitting the review late. I was unfortunately running a bit late for the deadlines just before this one. I hope the review fits into the collection. I noticed during submission that I am supposed to prepare a graphical abstract. I did not want to delay the submission any further just because of this. It would be nice to have some instructions on the graphical abstract (size, any recommendation for the contents,...). I can prepare one and submit later. To generate the contents of the table, I linked information from supplemental data tables of two different publications, which are cited. These comprehensive files could be uploaded as suppl. data, if there is a need.

With kind regards,

Ute

Review: Changing paradigms for the micronutrient zinc, a known protein cofactor, as a signal relaying also cellular redox state — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The review by Ute Krämer provides an expert view on the mechanisms of zinc homeostasis in plants. The review contains many reference values and a introduces a quantitative analysis of the zinc proteome. It briefly recapitulates the knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of metal homeostasis. Starting from basic physicochemical principles and well-established data in prokaryotic cells, the author proposes inspiring new hypotheses about the involvement of glutathione in zinc buffering and a role for zinc as a signal in plant cells. The review thus establishes a framework for future research in this field.

The manuscript is written in a clear and concise style. I have only very few suggestions for optimization:

1) The sections “protein metalation, binding and unbinding of cellular zinc ions” and “how is zinc buffered in plant cells” are somewhat redundant. Both sections highlight the probable role of glutathione in zinc buffering. As the two processes are intimately linked, would it be possible to merge the two sections to avoid redundancies?

2) The review does not address the interactions between zinc and phosphate or polyphosphate, which might be relevant for buffering and transport.

3) It would be nice to provide values for:

- “considerable amounts of zinc in harmless form inside the vacuole” (concentration, line 53)

- “dissociative ligand exchange…occurs exceedingly slowly” (rate constant, line 92)

- “associative ligand exchange… can occur very fast” (rate constant, line 94)

4) line 178-183: it would be interesting to mention that similar values in the 100 pM range have been reported in mammalian cells (Qin et al., 2013).

5) section “a brief overview of zinc acquisition and homeostasis in Arabidopsis”: it would be worthwhile stating that all the data published on other plants indicate that the functions of the main players of the homeostatic network revealed in Arabidopsis are conserved in distant species, such as rice.

6) line 243: “This has been attributed” (remove “is”)

Review: Changing paradigms for the micronutrient zinc, a known protein cofactor, as a signal relaying also cellular redox state — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The Manuscript “Changing paradigms of the micronutrient zinc, a versatile and effective protein cofactor and possible signal” focuses on Zn as a micronutrient and its role in plant organisms as a protein cofactor. Although there have been several excellent reviews recently that address Zn homeostasis in plants, including one by the author (Krämer 2024), the main focus has not been on Zn biological chemistry in the context of plant Zn homeostasis. Here, this review systematizes and updates the information available relating Zn chemistry, the different types of interactions between Zn and metalloprotein (Type I-III metalloproteins), and the buffering of Zn in the cellular environment. I think it is an excellent short review, that will be useful and help advancing the field of plant Zn homeostasis and Zn biology.

Comments:

Line 7, title: I think the title might be somehow unclear; I understand and agree that it is important to highlight Zn as a versatile and effective protein cofactor in the field of plant biology, but I don´t think that it represents a change of paradigm (being unclear what the previous paradigm was?). Instead, it is a step forward in providing more systematized information and contextualization on the role of Zn as a micronutrient in plant biology, to which, as I mentioned above, this review is an excellent contribution.

Lines 7 and 190-211: The text focuses on and develops the potential relevance of changes in cellular redox status on Zn homeostasis, suggesting that a condition of oxidative stress could lead to transient increase of intracellular buffered available Zn2+ concentration with impact on signalling and regulation. This is a very interesting and relevant point, which is very well addressed. However, I think that the connection between this point and a role for Zn2+ as a possible signal is not clearly stated. This would be important also in connection with the title, which refers to this possible role for Zn.

Line 208-211: It is referred that a role for Zn2+ (transient variations in buffered available Zn2+) as a signal in plants has hardly received attention, contrary to the animal field. In addition to the references mentioned in these lines, the review by Assuncao 2022 briefly discussed this possibility.

Minor comments:

Pag 61: “There are well-known examples Zn-deficient..” - missing “of”.

Pag 243: “This has been is attributed..” remove “has been/is”.

Pag 265: References are in italic, not consistent.

Review: Changing paradigms for the micronutrient zinc, a known protein cofactor, as a signal relaying also cellular redox state — R0/PR4

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

In this review article, Ute Kraemer presents an overview of the importance of Zn in Biology due to its particular chemistry, and how this chemistry determines Zn binding and unbinding to ligands. She then describes the Zn functions in plants, Zn homeostasis and buffering mechanisms in plants.

This is a nice piece of work, outlining current challenges and next frontiers in the study of Zn biology in plants. The author is an internationally recognized expert of these questions, and the manuscript is extremely knowledgeable. In this current form, I am not sure if this very expert presentation is fully accessible to a non-expert readership (especially the 1st half of the manuscript, up to ~ line 213). To solve this, I would suggest to take more space to define a number of concepts, maybe in a separate box not to overload the text. Such concepts to be defined could be :

- Irving-Williams series

- dissociative ligand exchange vs associative ligand exchange

- type I, II, III metalloproteins

- lewis acid

- metal buffer and buffered metal concentration. This last one is important, as it is a key concept discussed in the manuscript, and it is not formerly described.

I am wondering if the sections ‘Zn-dependent protein functions in plants’ and ‘Protein metalation, binding and unbinding of cellular Zn2+ ions’ should be inverted. This would connect the Zn chemistry property description to its impact on ligand binding, then allow a connection between Zn function, homeostasis and buffering in plants.

Fig. 1 C and D are very complex and are hard to connect to the text. I would suggest to expand their description in the legend, and to refer to those panels more often in the text where applicable (it is cited only once in the text). It may also require to include some further description of the concepts outlined in the figure in the main text.

The abstract reads like a succession of statements and, at first read, it is not always obvious how these are connected. It could be simplified and restructured to provide a clearer message about the content of the review.

Minor points :

- The formatting of the in-text citations is not consistent (some citations include initials to author first names, whereas most don’t.)

- I would suggest to use the same unit for Zn content in plant and soil (ug/g vs mg/kg)

- The reference Kraemer et al 2024 is heavily cited. Is it always justified vs citing original publications?

Recommendation: Changing paradigms for the micronutrient zinc, a known protein cofactor, as a signal relaying also cellular redox state — R0/PR5

Comments

Dear Dr. Krämer, (liebe Ute),

your manuscript “Changing paradigms of the micronutrient zinc, a versatile and effective protein cofactor and possible signal” has been seen by two independent reviewers. Both are very positive and have only a few minor suggestions that I would like you to take into account in a minor revision.

Thank you for your valuable contribution to the Research Topic “Quantitative approaches to cellular aspects of plant ion homeostasis”.

Best wishes

Ingo

Decision: Changing paradigms for the micronutrient zinc, a known protein cofactor, as a signal relaying also cellular redox state — R0/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Changing paradigms for the micronutrient zinc, a known protein cofactor, as a signal relaying also cellular redox state — R1/PR7

Comments

Dear Editors,

Thank you for handling my manuscript and your positive decision. Here I submit the 1st revision. Responses to the reviewers' comments to reviewers were uploaded in a separate pdf file.

With kind regards,

Ute

Recommendation: Changing paradigms for the micronutrient zinc, a known protein cofactor, as a signal relaying also cellular redox state — R1/PR8

Comments

Dear Ute,

thank you for the careful revision of the manuscript and thanks again for your valuable contribution to the Research Topic “Quantitative approaches to cellular aspects of plant ion homeostasis”. It is highly appreciated.

Best regards, Ingo

Decision: Changing paradigms for the micronutrient zinc, a known protein cofactor, as a signal relaying also cellular redox state — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.