Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:56:58.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The validity of Dawkins's selfish gene theory and the role of the unconscious in decision making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Tobias A. Mattei
Tobias A. Mattei*
Affiliation:
Neurosurgery Department, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43201. [email protected]://www.invisionhealth.com/providers/neurosurgery/tobias-mattei-md/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the proposed Selfish Goal Theory constitutes a major theoretical tour de force for addressing the issue of inconsistencies in human actions and the role of motivational goals in behavior, as it is based on an unproven biological paradigm (Dawkins's selfish gene theory) and overemphasizes the role of unconscious processes in decision making, it provides a questionable model of the underlying psychological structure of human agency.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 148 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassi, J. (1968) Antropomorphism in science. In: Dictionary of the history of ideas: Studies of selected pivotal ideas, ed. Wiener, P. P., pp. 87–91. Scribner. Available at: http://www.tau.ac.il/~agass/joseph-papers/anthro.pdf.Google Scholar
Bor-Sen, C., Chih-Yuan, H. & Jing-Jia, L. (2011) Robust design of biological circuits: Evolutionary systems biology approach. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2011:304236.Google Scholar
Cabanac, M., Cabanac, A. J. & Parent, A. (2009) The emergence of consciousness in phylogeny. Behavioural Brain Research 198:267–72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.028.Google Scholar
Crick, F. (1970) Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 227:561–63.Google Scholar
da Fonseca, R. R., Kosiol, C., Vinar, T., Siepel, A. & Nielsen, R. (2010) Positive selection on apoptosis related genes. FEBS Letters 584:469–76.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1982) The extended phenotype. W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (1995) The neurobiology of human consciousness: An evolutionary approach. Neuropsychologia 33:1087–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dundzila, V. L. (1987) The ancient Latvian religion. Lithuaninan Quarterly Journal of Arts and Sciences 33:3.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1915) The unconscious. In: Penguin Freud library. On metapsychology, vol. 11. Penguin 1984.Google Scholar
Haggard, P. & Clark, S. (2003) Intentional action: Conscious experience and neural prediction. Consciousness and Cognition 12:695–707.Google Scholar
Hordern, P. J. (1972) Religious conceptions and the world of nature in ancient Egypt. Available at: http://digitalcommons.mcmaster.ca/opendissertations/7701/.Google Scholar
Huang, S. (2012) The molecular and mathematical basis of Waddington's epigenetic landscape: A framework for post-Darwinian biology? Bioessays 34:149–57.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890) Principles of psychology, 2 vols. Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987) The cognitive unconscious. Science 237:1445–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kühn, S., Brass, M. & Haggard, P. (2013) Feeling in control: Neural correlates of experience of agency. Cortex 49(7):1935–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.09.002.Google Scholar
Longo, G. & Tendero, P.-E. (2007) The differential method and the causal incompleteness of programming theory in molecular biology. Foundations of Science 12:337–66.Google Scholar
Mirouze, M. (2012) The small RNA-based odyssey of epigenetic information in plants: From cells to species. DNA Cell Biology 31:1650–56. doi: 10.1089/dna.2012.1681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morin, A. & Michaud, J. (2007) Self-awareness and the left inferior frontal gyrus: Inner speech use during self-related processing. Brain Research Bulletin 74:387–96.Google Scholar
Newell, B. R. & Shanks, D. R. (2014) Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37(1):1–61.Google Scholar
Noble, D. (2011) Neo-Darwinism, the modern synthesis and selfish genes: Are they of use in physiology? Journal of Physiology 589:1007–15.Google Scholar
Pearson, B. J. & Sánchez, A. (2008) Regeneration, stem cells, and the evolution of tumor suppression. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 73:565–72. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2008.73.045.Google Scholar
Pennartz, C. M. (2009) Identification and integration of sensory modalities: Neural basis and relation to consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 18:718–39.Google Scholar
Pennisi, E. (2012) Genomics. ENCODE project writes eulogy for junk DNA. Science 337:1159–61.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L. (1992) Implicit knowledge: New perspectives on unconscious processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89:11, 113–17.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. A. (2009) Revisiting the central dogma in the 21st century. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1178:6–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04990.x.Google Scholar
Vogeley, K. & Fink, G. R. (2003) Neural correlates of the first-person-perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7:38–42.Google Scholar
von Schelling, F. (1800/1978) System des transcendentalen Idealismus/System of Transcendental Idealism, trans. Heath, P.. University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. D. (2002) Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar