Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:34:09.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diversity and distribution of avian haemosporidians in sub-Saharan Africa: an inter-regional biogeographic overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2016

DIANA C. OUTLAW*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, PO Box GY, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
JOHANNA A. HARVEY
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, 210 Nagle, MS 2258, College Station, TX 77843, USA
SERGEI V. DROVETSKI
Affiliation:
Division of Birds, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 1000 Constitution Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20004, USA
GARY VOELKER
Affiliation:
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, 210 Nagle, MS 2258, College Station, TX 77843, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, PO Box GY, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

The diversity of avian malaria parasites is much greater than 20th century morphologists realized and virtually every study in this field in the last 15 years has uncovered previously undocumented diversity at multiple levels within the taxonomic hierarchy. Despite this explosion of knowledge, there remain vast sampling gaps, both geographically and host-taxonomically, which makes characterizing patterns of diversity extremely challenging. Here, we summarize the current state of knowledge of sub-Saharan African avian malaria parasite diversity, focusing on avian hosts endemic to Africa. The relative proportions of the parasite genera included here, Plasmodium, Haemoproteus (including Parahaemoproteus) and Leucocytozoon, varied between regions, in part due to habitat preferences of the insect vectors of these genera, and in part we believe due to sampling bias. Biogeographic regions of sub-Saharan Africa harbour about the same proportion of endemic to shared parasite lineages, but there appears to be no phylogenetic structuring across regions. Our results highlight the sampling problem that must be addressed if we are to have a detailed understanding of parasite diversity in Africa. Without broad sampling within and across regions and hosts, using both molecular tools and microscopy, conclusions about parasite diversity, host–parasite interactions or even transmission dynamics remain extremely limited.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

INTRODUCTION

The ecosystems of the African continent collectively harbour some of the highest continental bird diversity in the world; only the Neotropics and tropical Asia are more diverse. Not surprisingly, the malaria parasites of these birds appear to be as diverse as their avian hosts (see also Clark et al. Reference Clark, Clegg and Lima2014), as reflected in a number of regional studies conducted over the past decade (e.g. Smith et al. Reference Smith, Thomassen, Freedman, Sehgal, Buermann, Saatchi, Pollinger, Milá, Pires, Valkiūnas and Wayne2011; Loiseau et al. Reference Loiseau, Harrigan, Robert, Bowie, Thomassen, Smith and Sehgal2012; Okanga et al. Reference Okanga, Cumming, Hockey, Nupen and Peters2014; Lauron et al. Reference Lauron, Loiseau, Bowie, Spicer, Smith, Melo and Sehgal2015; Lutz et al. Reference Lutz, Hochachka, Engel, Bell, Tkach, Bates, Hackett and Weckstein2015). While this diversity is to some extent driven by regional ecosystem differences including host distributions (see also Lauron et al. Reference Lauron, Loiseau, Bowie, Spicer, Smith, Melo and Sehgal2015), the underlying method of transmission is likely also a factor (Santiago-Alarcon et al. Reference Santiago-Alarcon, Palinauskas and Schaefer2012). Although all three major genera of avian malaria parasites are vectored by dipteran arthropods, the current understanding is that Plasmodium is vectored by mosquitoes, whereas Haemoproteus is transmitted by louse flies or biting midges, and Leucocytozoon is transmitted by black flies (Valkiūnas, Reference Valkiūnas2005). The different ecological requirements of these dipteran vectors (largely related to water availability, water flow and temperature) play a major role in the overall distribution of each haemosporidian genus. Our goal here is to use existing genetic data on parasite lineages to provide a synthesis of known malaria parasite diversity across sub-Saharan Africa. To accomplish this, we have characterized patterns of diversity in African avian malaria parasites to address three basic questions: (1) How diverse are malaria parasites within the biogeographic regions of Africa?, (2) How are parasite lineages distributed geographically, i.e. what are the proportions of endemic parasites in each region and are some regions more likely to share lineages than others?, and (3) What are the host preferences and host breadths of these parasites?

The state of the continent

From very early microscopy analyses of ~ 11 500 blood smears, 70 morphological Haemoproteus (including Parahaemoproteus and Haemoproteus) and 13 morphological Plasmodium species have been found in birds in Africa (Garnham, Reference Garnham1950; see Valkiūnas, Reference Valkiūnas2005 for summary). Yet of these, just 15 Parahaemoproteus, 2 Haemoproteus and 2 Plasmodium morpho-species were endemic to Africa. From the 1970s through early 1990s, surveys based on microscopy of blood smears collected from a taxonomically broad spectrum of host species were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, and prevalence (percentage of birds with detectable parasites in the blood) ranged from similar levels of 11·5% in Senegal, 13% in Cameroon and 19·1% across sub-Saharan Africa (collectively), to a comparatively high level of 37% from East African savannah regions (Bennett and Herman, Reference Bennett and Herman1976; Bennett et al. Reference Bennett, Blancou, White and Williams1978; Kirkpatrick and Smith, Reference Kirkpatrick and Smith1988; Bennett et al. Reference Bennett, Earle, Du Toit and Huchzermeyer1992). In 2005, two very detailed studies, one focused on western African rainforests (Sehgal et al. Reference Sehgal, Jones and Smith2005) and one from Uganda (Valkiūnas et al. Reference Valkiūnas, Sehgal, Iezhova and Smith2005), highlighted the diversity of haemosporidian parasites in Africa using microscopy techniques. Combined, these two studies included 1276 individual birds, and haemosporidian parasites were identified in 27 avian families, with prevalence ranging from 28·6 to 61·9%, with the highest numbers from Uganda.

Surveys of molecular phylogenetic relationships generally return higher diversity and prevalence estimates than microscopy, although these can be inflated due to circulating sporozoites. A recent survey of parasites in Western Congolian rainforests (Møller et al. Reference Møller, Garamszegi, Peralta-Sánchez and Soler2011) identified haemosporidians from 25 host families from just 527 individual birds; Plasmodium infections alone were detected in 45% of individuals (Beadell et al. Reference Beadell, Covas, Gebhard, Ishtiaq, Melo, Schmidt, Perkins, Graves and Fleischer2009). And indeed, most molecular examinations of parasite diversity in birds have focused on just a few families (primarily sunbirds [Nectariniidae] and bulbuls [Pycnonotidae]) from the Western African or Western Congolian rainforests (Bonneaud et al. Reference Bonneaud, Sepil, Milá, Buermann, Pollinger, Sehgal, Valkiūnas, Iezhova, Saatchi and Smith2009; Chasar et al. Reference Chasar, Loiseau, Valkiūnas, Iezhova, Smith and Sehgal2009; Loiseau et al. Reference Loiseau, Valkiūnas, Chasar, Hutchinson, Iezhova and Sehgal2010; Iezhova et al. Reference Iezhova, Dodge, Sehgal, Smith and Valkiūnas2011; but see Hellgren et al. Reference Hellgren, Waldenström, Peréz-Tris, Szöll, Si, Hasselquist, Krizanauskiene, Ottosson and Bensch2007 and Lauron et al. Reference Lauron, Loiseau, Bowie, Spicer, Smith, Melo and Sehgal2015). Recent exceptions to these taxonomically limited, rainforest-based studies are from the Vwaza Marsh in Malawi (Lutz et al. Reference Lutz, Hochachka, Engel, Bell, Tkach, Bates, Hackett and Weckstein2015) and wetlands in the Western Cape of South Africa (Okanga et al. Reference Okanga, Cumming, Hockey, Nupen and Peters2014). The only study to assess diversity in the Saharan region used targeted sampling in northeastern Nigeria for a limited number of avian species (n = 9) thereby not reflecting the overall malaria diversity of that region (Waldenström et al. Reference Waldenström, Bensch, Kiboi, Hasselquist and Ottosson2002).

In a broader study of global parasite diversity, Clark et al. (Reference Clark, Clegg and Lima2014) include sub-Saharan Africa as a biodiversity hotspot for haemosporidian parasites, but do not explicitly discuss parasite distributions on the continent. In another study focusing on Plasmodium parasites from African sunbirds, Lauron et al. (Reference Lauron, Loiseau, Bowie, Spicer, Smith, Melo and Sehgal2015) show that there is a great deal of variation in the distributions of Plasmodium lineages, with some being geographically limited and others very widespread. Likewise, some Plasmodium lineages from sunbirds are probably more specialized on hosts than others.

State of the sampling: limitations

Studies of haemosporidian diversity in Africa, like those in virtually every other part of the world, have been inconsistent with collection and with laboratory protocols to detect parasites. Much of the variation that we see across Africa may be in part due to these research biases. The overwhelming majority of studies have focused on Haemoproteus and Plasmodium (Ricklefs and Fallon, Reference Ricklefs and Fallon2002; Waldenström et al. Reference Waldenström, Bensch, Kiboi, Hasselquist and Ottosson2002; Durrant et al. Reference Durrant, Reed, Jones, Dallimer, Cheke, McWilliam and Fleischer2007; Pérez-Tris et al. Reference Pérez-Tris, Hellgren, Križanauskiene, Waldenström, Secondi, Bonneaud, Fjeldså, Hasselquist and Bensch2007; Beadell et al. Reference Beadell, Covas, Gebhard, Ishtiaq, Melo, Schmidt, Perkins, Graves and Fleischer2009; Bonneaud et al. Reference Bonneaud, Sepil, Milá, Buermann, Pollinger, Sehgal, Valkiūnas, Iezhova, Saatchi and Smith2009; Ishtiaq et al. Reference Ishtiaq, Beadell, H.warren and Fleischer2012; Karamba et al. Reference Karamba, Kawo, Dabo and Mukhtar2012), and sometimes only on Plasmodium (Beadell et al. Reference Beadell, Ishtiaq, Covas, Melo, Warren, Atkinson, Bensch, Graves, Jhala, Peirce, Rahmani, Fonseca and Fleischer2006; Valkiūnas et al. Reference Valkiūnas, Iezhova, Loiseau, Smith and Sehgal2009; Loiseau et al. Reference Loiseau, Harrigan, Robert, Bowie, Thomassen, Smith and Sehgal2012). Of the 15 studies, the data for which are included in our analyses, only three include data from Leucocytozoon (Hellgren et al. Reference Hellgren, Waldenström, Peréz-Tris, Szöll, Si, Hasselquist, Krizanauskiene, Ottosson and Bensch2007; Ishak et al. Reference Ishak, Dumbacher, Anderson, Keane, Valkiünas, Haig, Tell and Sehgal2008; Lutz et al. Reference Lutz, Hochachka, Engel, Bell, Tkach, Bates, Hackett and Weckstein2015), because these other studies did not look for this parasite. Further restricting the potential diversity is that most studies include only passerines (songbirds, representing roughly ½ of avian diversity), or at least the majority of the samples came from passerines. And, finally, most studies have been geographically limited, as we discuss above.

We point out also that previous studies of African malaria parasites (see above) did not systematically sample across parasite lineages in their molecular techniques. In particular, primer bias issues in commonly used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques exist such that some primers target primarily Plasmodium or Plasmodium and Haemoproteus but are not well suited for Leucocytozoon. Thus, any regional differences could be partially attributable to primer bias, rather than differences related to vectors and their life histories or to host specialization.

Biogeographic regional parasite diversity

Linder et al. (Reference Linder, de Klerk, Born, Burgess, Fjeldså and Rahbek2012) developed statistical models of faunal distributions across sub-Saharan Africa and here we use that which they developed and defined for birds (i.e. the hosts). Virtually all African avifauna cluster into these seven statistically-defined sub-Saharan biogeographic regions (rather than geographic as in Lauron et al. Reference Lauron, Loiseau, Bowie, Spicer, Smith, Melo and Sehgal2015): Saharan (to include Mauritanian), Sudanian, Ethiopian, Somalian, Congolian, Zambezian and Southern African. Although each region does have some number of endemic bird species, areas with a larger proportion of endemics are the Ethiopian, Congolian and Zambezian regions; these three regions also have the highest levels of species richness (Jetz and Rahbek, Reference Jetz and Rahbek2002; Fjeldså, Reference Fjeldså2003). For the Ethiopian region, endemism and species richness are tied to distinctive high elevation mountains, whereas endemism and species richness in the Congolian region are tied to lowland tropical forest habitat. And, in the Zambezian region, endemism and species richness are largely associated with Afromontane forests in the East Arc Mountains of Tanzania and Kenya. Much of the remainder of the Zambezian region comprises semi-arid savannah and deciduous dry forests, and as such, much of the avifauna found in the Zambezian region is also found in the different and varying habitats found in the Southern African region as well (see Sinclair and Ryan, Reference Sinclair and Ryan2010 for avian distributions).

Similarly, the desert and semi-arid northern savannahs found in the Saharan, Sudanian and to some extent the Ethiopian and Somalian regions also tend to share avian species. The Sudanian region is unique however in hosting a significant number of wintering European migrant species (see Sinclair and Ryan, Reference Sinclair and Ryan2010). And finally, avifaunal assemblages to the north of the Sahara, for example those found in the Atlas Mountains of Morocco and Algeria, tend to have closer ties to the European avifauna than to sub-Saharan ones. As a broad generalization then, avian species tend to be restricted to one or more northern regions, the Congolian region, or to either or both of the southern regions (Zambezian and Southern African). Because of the regional variation in avian assemblages, we sought to evaluate whether these partitions are also apparent in avian malaria parasites.

Geographic distribution of parasite lineages

With the large number of endemic bird species within each of the biogeographic regions, we were interested in evaluating whether this regional variation is also reflected in their malaria parasites. Here, we define an endemic parasite by whether the lineage was only recovered from one region but was found in two or more host individuals. We also wanted to know how many lineages are shared between regions, i.e. whether a parasite lineage was found in two or more regions. Because the genera of malaria parasites use different insect vectors (see above), we also evaluated the proportions of each parasite genus within each region. For an evolutionary context, we conducted a phylogenetic analysis of all lineages to determine whether phylogenetic structure was linked to biogeographic regions in any way, i.e. do one or more regions harbour distinct clades of malaria parasites as you might expect if parasites were host specific?

Host preferences

Recent research has shown that there may be as many avian malaria parasite species as there are avian hosts (see Ricklefs et al. Reference Ricklefs, Outlaw, Coelho, Medeiros, Ellis and Latta2014), so parasites should be the most diverse in regions with the greatest proportions of endemic host species. To address this, we determined the number of host species in which each parasite lineage was detected and how host families are parasitized by genus. Five of the best sampled passerine families (Cisticolidae, Estrildidae, Nectariniidae, Ploceidae and Pycnonotidae) have their greatest diversity in Africa. However, because these families are widespread across Africa, their distributions may homogenize parasite communities across African regions to some extent due to the Abundance–Occupancy Relationship (Drovetski et al. Reference Drovetski, Aghayan, Mata, Lopes, Mode, Harvey and Voelker2014). Finally, we used the Host Specificity Index (S TD; Poulin and Mouillot, Reference Poulin and Mouillot2003) to determine if, at the broad scale of genera (due to the limitations of ‘positive-only’ data in MalAvi; Bensch et al. Reference Bensch, Hellgren and Pérez–Tris2009), parasite genera demonstrate different strategies of parasitism. Without prevalence data by species and region, we cannot eliminate the possibility of spill-over infections into non-preferred or dead-end hosts confounding potential patterns; this is a major limitation of these data included here.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data compilation

We downloaded all malaria lineage data from MalAvi (April 2015; http://mbio-serv2.mbioekol.lu.se/Malavi/) and pruned the dataset to include only those lineages sampled from resident birds from continental sub-Saharan Africa (1068 cytochrome b sequences in 410 lineages [unique sequences]). Limiting our sampling to sub-Saharan Africa allowed us to make use of the statistically-derived African bird faunal regions from Linder et al. (Reference Linder, de Klerk, Born, Burgess, Fjeldså and Rahbek2012) for inter-regional comparisons and assessments of regional endemism. We assigned each malaria lineage to one or more of four regions: Congolian, South African, Sudanian and Zambezian (Table 1). Somalian and Ethiopian regions were excluded from the analyses because no data from MalAvi exist from these regions, and Saharan samples were excluded because just 13 parasite sequences have been found there (i.e. too few for meaningful comparisons). For some analyses, we also excluded South African samples because only ten lineages were found there.

Table 1. Lineages found only within one region, by genus (P = 0·0002).

Data analyses

We compiled the numbers of lineages that were found in only one region (hereafter, ‘endemic’) or were found in two, or more regions (hereafter, ‘shared’), but excluded lineages found only once (i.e. lineages represented by only one sequence) (Table 2). Using a general linear model (SPSS v24), we tested whether biogeographic regions varied in their proportions of hosts infected by parasite genera (Haemoproteus, Plasmodium and Leucocytozoon). Using a chi-square test (vassarstats.net), we calculated whether biogeographic regions differed in their proportions of endemic and shared lineages. Host specificity was measured using taxonomic distance between host species infected with the same malaria lineage by using the host specificity index S TD and VarS TD, which measures taxonomic evenness (Clarke and Warwick, Reference Clarke and Warwick2001; Poulin and Mouillot, Reference Poulin and Mouillot2003). Host species are arranged into six broadly accepted taxonomic levels using class, superorder, order, family, genera and species (Dickinson and Remsen, Reference Dickinson and Remsen2013). These taxonomic steps provide the maximum value of S TD where 5 is the maximum steps needed to reach a common ancestor (Class Aves) when all other taxonomic classes are different and 1 being the minimum value when host are sister species; lower specificity values indicate increased host specificity. On the other hand, VarS TD values are indicative of symmetry in taxonomic structure (or evenness), such that a low score would indicate equal taxonomic distances (steps in the taxonomic hierarchy employed) across host species, whereas high values would indicate taxonomic asymmetry or unequal taxonomic distances across host species. Parasite lineages recovered once were removed from S TD and VarS TD analyses as no comparisons can be made.

Table 2. Number of lineages in each region that are endemic to that region and number of lineages found in each region that are shared with other (1 or more) regions (P = 0·0617).

Phylogenetic analysis

We reconstructed 10 000 000 trees of all lineages using a Bayesian framework (BEAST v1.6.2 with HKY + I + Γ model of nucleotide substitution with estimated nucleotide frequencies and a Yule Process [speciation]) sampling every 1000 trees (Drummond et al. Reference Drummond, Suchard, Xie and Rambaut2012). After evaluating tree log-likelihood scores using Tracer (v1.6.0; Rambaut et al. Reference Rambaut, Suchard, Xie and Drummond2014) we calculated the maximum clade credibility tree from 10 000 trees with TreeAnnotator (v1.6.2). We coded each terminal branch by the biogeographic region from which it was found (or black for widespread lineages).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Biogeographic regional parasite diversity

A total of 983 infections were reported in resident birds from sub-Saharan Africa. The Congolian region had 249 infections (71 Haemoproteus, 175 Plasmodium, 3 Leucocytozoon); the South African had 76 infections (19 Haemoproteus, 57 Plasmodium, 0 Leucocytozoon); the Sudanian had 167 infections (61 Haemoproteus, 62 Plasmodium, 44 Leucocytozoon); and the Zambezian had 491 infections (121 Haemoproteus, 216 Plasmodium, 154 Leucocytozoon). Focusing on lineages rather than infections, the number of lineages by genus found within only one region varied (chi-square, P < 0·0002, d.f. = 6); notably, when excluding lineages reported only once, the Congolian region harbours no Leucocytozoon lineages in resident birds. However, migratory birds collected there have been infected with this parasite genus (see Hellgren et al. Reference Hellgren, Waldenström, Peréz-Tris, Szöll, Si, Hasselquist, Krizanauskiene, Ottosson and Bensch2007).

The different proportions of parasite genera between regions may be due to the ecological distributions of their vectors or to uneven sampling, or to a combination thereof. For example, Plasmodium and its Culex mosquito vectors (Garnham, Reference Garnham1966; Valkiūnas, Reference Valkiūnas2005) tend to be broadly distributed (Clark et al. Reference Clark, Clegg and Lima2014), but Culex are limited by temperature and precipitation, and require standing water (often stagnant) for breeding (Patz and Olson, Reference Patz and Olson2006; other mosquito genera utilize floodwater areas). The genus Haemoproteus and its subgenera Haemoproteus and Parahaemoproteus are vectored by several species of hippoboscid flies (Hippoboscidae) and biting midges (Culicoides), respectively (Atkinson and van Riper, Reference Atkinson, van Riper, Loye and Zuk1991). Both hippoboscids and biting midges tend to range from semi-moist to more arid regions but require moist soil or water for breeding (Meiswinkel et al. Reference Meiswinkel, Venter and Nevill2004). Finally, Leucocytozoon is vectored by black flies (Simuliidae), which require clean, flowing water to lay their eggs (Carlsson, Reference Carlsson1967).

These different environmental preferences of vectors could explain some of the parasite genera proportions we found within regions. In the comparatively moist/humid Congolian region for example, Plasmodium dominated the infections (Fig. 1) with a moderate level of Haemoproteus, and Leucocytozoon was virtually absent. Importantly however, Leucocytozoon was found in many migrants from the Congolian region, the data for which were excluded from our analyses (see MalAvi; Bensch et al. Reference Bensch, Hellgren and Pérez–Tris2009). This same pattern held for the Sudanian region, which seems anomalous given that region is far more arid than the Congolian. However the specific localities sampled in the Sudanian region were close to the Congolian region. Thus, the higher rates of infection by Plasmodium and Haemoproteus would be expected. The same was also true for the Zambezian, a region also drier than the Congolian. Given that the bulk of the Zambezian sampling comes from a single study focused on the Vwaza Marshes of Malawi (Lutz et al. Reference Lutz, Hochachka, Engel, Bell, Tkach, Bates, Hackett and Weckstein2015), the high levels of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus are also expected. We would anticipate that sampling in the Sudanian and Zambezian regions, away from extensive water sources, would result in lower regional prevalence of Plasmodium and Haemoproteus. Finally, the Southern African region (which has the poorest sampling to date; Fig. 1) is dominated by Plasmodium infections, with a lower level of Haemoproteus infection and no Leucocytozoon infections. Given the broad range of habitat variation across this region, particularly in South Africa, we would expect that more intensive and systematic sampling will yield not only higher levels of Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon infections, but also strong intra-regional differences in genus level infections.

Fig. 1. Biogeographic regions of African avifauna (from Linder et al. Reference Linder, de Klerk, Born, Burgess, Fjeldså and Rahbek2012). Pie charts represent the relative proportions of parasite genera in each region (Grey: Plasmodium, Black: Leucocytozoon; White: Haemoproteus). Numbers in pie charts are the number of infections of each genus.

Geographic distribution of parasite lineages

There was no phylogenetic structuring of lineages by biogeographic region (Fig. 2), despite the differences in broad scale distributions of parasites at the generic level (Fig. 1) and the high proportions of endemics in several regions. This is probably due to the predominantly-sampled widespread avian families (largely Passeriformes, Table 3) that would homogenize, to some extent, parasite distributions across regions (see below). If this limited structure holds up to further sampling, this pattern would indicate the importance of other factors such as vector distributions and connectivity between regions due to host movements.

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic reconstruction African avian malaria parasites. Coloured terminal branches correspond to biogeographic regions: Congolian – purple, Southern African – brown, Sudanian – orange, Zambezian – blue, widespread – black. Clades are highlighted to genus: Plasmodium – light grey, Leucocytozoon – white, Haemoproteus – medium grey. Note that branch lengths are depicted as in a cladogram for simplification.

Table 3. Number of infections collected from hosts by host family, and number of lineages from each parasite genus by host family. Note that the number of lineages most often does not add up to the number of infected birds.

Host preferences

With a few exceptions based on geographic distributions, passerine families are infected by Plasmodium more than they are by Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon (Table 3); however, very few studies sample all three genera at the same time, and these biases through ‘lack of’ sampling would almost certainly affect our interpretations. Weavers (Ploceidae) are infected by all three parasite genera, but slightly more by Haemoproteus. Old World warblers (Sylviidae) are also infected by all three parasite genera, but again, more so by Haemoproteus. Sampling of bush-shrikes (Malaconotidae) is low, but none are infected by Haemoproteus. Old World sparrows (Passeridae) are seemingly not infected by Leucocytozoon. Sampling of non-passerine families has been geographically spotty and taxonomically biased, and therefore we need much more broad sampling to firmly establish patterns of host use.

Previous studies have shown how variable parasite distributions can be, and for example, that the distribution of malaria parasites across the landscape was dependent on habitat (distance from rivers), or age and sex of the bird (Wood et al. Reference Wood, Cosgrove, Wilkin, Knowles, Day and Sheldon2007). The differing number of lineages parasitizing a host species or family may be due to migratory behaviour, habitat (even microhabitat as different vectors may specialize in different strata), other environmental variables, host evasion and other behaviours (gregariousness; Atkinson and van Riper, Reference Atkinson, van Riper, Loye and Zuk1991; Loiseau et al. Reference Loiseau, Valkiūnas, Chasar, Hutchinson, Iezhova and Sehgal2010; Rifkin et al. Reference Rifkin, Nunn and Garamszegi2012; Garcia-Longoria et al. Reference Garcia-Longoria, Garamszegi and Moller2014; Olsson-Pons et al. Reference Olsson-Pons, Clark, Ishtiaq and Clegg2015), as well as detection biases, i.e. abortive stages of development and PCR bias. For example, the somewhat higher levels of Haemoproteus infections in weavers could possibly be explained by the ease with which hippoboscid flies and midges could move between nests – many weaver species tend to nest in dense colonies. However, the former nesting behaviour is not characteristic of sylviids, which also showed higher Haemoproteus infections.

Parasite genera are not host-specific. Values of the Host Specificity Index (S TD ranged from 4·17 to 4·64; Table 4) reveal a low level of host specificity across all three parasite genera. When all the three genera are grouped the host specificity index remains high with a value of 4·28. Thus, parasite genera are widely distributed across Superorder and Orders of birds. VarSTD values were low, which indicates taxonomic structure was even across all parasite genera (individually and grouped) and further indicates that common ancestor distance of hosts were evenly distributed and reached at a high taxonomic level (in this case at the level of Order).

Table 4. Host specificity indices by parasite genus.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

There are major sampling gaps of avian malaria parasites in Africa, and this is problematic for understanding a range of malaria-related topics, from simple assessments of lineage diversity to regional assemblages and endemism to broader ecological questions related to vector habitat preferences and how and why some lineages are broadly distributed while others are not (i.e. the Abundance–Occupancy Relationship; Drovetski et al. Reference Drovetski, Aghayan, Mata, Lopes, Mode, Harvey and Voelker2014; see also Lauron et al. Reference Lauron, Loiseau, Bowie, Spicer, Smith, Melo and Sehgal2015). Indeed, we find that when we sample a new region or a new host-taxonomic group, that we almost inevitably find new parasite lineages at both the species- and genus-level (Martinsen et al. Reference Martinsen, Mcinerney, Brightman, Ferebee, Walsh, Mcshea, Forrester, Ware, Joyner, Perkins, Latch, Yabsley, Schall and Fleischer2016; Outlaw, unpublished data). The basic solution to all of these problems is simple: extensive geographic sampling is required and needs to include both molecular approaches and microscopy. And, sampling at each location should be as extensive as possible in terms of avian hosts (i.e. the broadest possible taxonomic diversity) and numbers of individual hosts sampled per species to convert singletons (or just a handful of birds of a given species) to reasonable frequencies for comparisons. Post-sampling, molecular assessments should be standardized in an effort to recover all the three malaria genera. Combined, these rather straightforward suggestions can provide an abundance of meaningful comparative data, even if just two regions are being compared (e.g. Mata et al. Reference Mata, da Silva, Lopes and Drovetski2015).

Despite sampling issues (both taxonomic and molecular), currently available data from sub-Saharan Africa does suggest that there are a substantial number of endemic malaria lineages within avifaunal regions, and that this endemism may in turn be related to regional avian host endemism. Further, there does seem to be a general relationship between the type of habitat in which a host was sampled, and the prevalence of malaria parasite genera, as one would predict based on vector breeding-habitat preference, Plasmodium tends to be more prevalent in mesic habitats because mosquitoes require standing water, Haemoproteus tend to be more prevalent in xeric habitats because midges often only require moist soil, and Leucocytozoon is tied to running water, which its black fly hosts require for breeding. To extend our call for additional sampling, intra-regional microhabitats are another missing puzzle piece, as intra-regional dynamics may be as important and perhaps of more interest than coarse inter-regional studies. The Vwaza Marsh study by Lutz et al. (Reference Lutz, Hochachka, Engel, Bell, Tkach, Bates, Hackett and Weckstein2015) is an excellent example of this. And, temporal variation may also play a role in malaria distribution in that temperature regimes may cause cyclical variation in prevalence; accounting for this should be considered, when and where possible (see Svensson-Coelho et al. Reference Svensson-Coelho, Blake, Loiselle, Penrose, Parker and Ricklefs2013).

As we increase sampling across and within African bioregions, and indeed bioregions on any continent, we will be able to better decipher patterns of diversification across different scales (from inter-regional to micro-habitat). A broader knowledge of biogeographic patterns will not only help us better understand patterns and processes of malaria distributions, but will naturally lead to informative studies of vectors and how their natural history impacts malaria distribution. This knowledge can also provide insight into studies of why some avian hosts are more susceptible to infection, why some hosts are more likely to carry parasites between regions or continents, and why some host species tend to be more highly parasitized than others (see also Clark et al. Reference Clark, Clegg and Lima2014). An added benefit will be that the extensive sampling of avian hosts will allow for much finer scale phylogeographic/population genetic sampling of those hosts than is currently available for most species. This is particularly important in understory-dwelling host species found in Afrotropical forests, where recent work has uncovered extensive cryptic diversity (e.g, Huntley and Voelker, Reference Huntley and Voelker2016). And together, extensive sampling of malaria parasites and their hosts will allow for powerful and meaningful assessments of the impacts of climate change over time. Ultimately, we do not know what is out there waiting to be discovered, and to expand our knowledge in these areas, it is all about the sampling.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work would not have been possible without the samples that have been collected over the years across Africa, and the MalAvi database. We thank two anonymous reviewers whose critiques improved the manuscript. This is publication number 1532 of the Biodiversity Research and Teaching Collections at Texas A&M.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, C. T. and van Riper, C. III (1991). Epizootiology and pathogenicity of avian hematozoa: Plasmodium, Haemoproteus, and Leucocytozoon . In Bird-Parasite Interactions. Ecology, Evolution and Behavior (ed. Loye, J. E. and Zuk, M.), pp. 1948. Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beadell, J. S., Ishtiaq, F., Covas, R., Melo, M., Warren, B. H., Atkinson, C. T., Bensch, S., Graves, G. R., Jhala, Y. V., Peirce, M. A., Rahmani, A. R., Fonseca, D. M. and Fleischer, R. C. (2006). Global phylogeographic limits of Hawaii's avian malaria. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273, 29352944.Google Scholar
Beadell, J. S., Covas, R., Gebhard, C., Ishtiaq, F., Melo, M., Schmidt, B. K., Perkins, S. L., Graves, G. R. and Fleischer, R. C. (2009). Host associations and evolutionary relationships of avian blood parasites from West Africa. International Journal for Parasitology 39, 257266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, G. F. and Herman, C. M. (1976). Blood parasites of some birds from Kenya, Tanzania and Zaire. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 12, 5965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, G. F., Blancou, J., White, E. M. and Williams, N. A. (1978). Blood parasites of some birds from Senegal. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 14, 6773.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bennett, G. F., Earle, R. A., Du Toit, H. and Huchzermeyer, F. W. (1992). A host-parasite catalogue of the haematozoa of the sub-Saharan birds. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 59, 173.Google ScholarPubMed
Bensch, S., Hellgren, O. and Pérez–Tris, J. (2009). MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Molecular Ecology Resources 5, 13531358.Google Scholar
Bonneaud, C., Sepil, I., Milá, B., Buermann, W., Pollinger, J., Sehgal, R., Valkiūnas, G., Iezhova, T., Saatchi, S. and Smith, T. B. (2009). The prevalence of avian Plasmodium is higher in undisturbed tropical forests of Cameroon. Journal of Tropical Ecology 25, 439447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, G. (1967). Environmental factors influencing blackfly populations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 37, 139.Google Scholar
Chasar, A., Loiseau, C., Valkiūnas, G., Iezhova, T., Smith, T. B. and Sehgal, R. (2009). Prevalence and diversity patterns of African avian blood parasites in degraded habitats. Molecular Ecology 18, 41214133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, N. J., Clegg, S. M. and Lima, M. R. (2014). A review of global diversity in avian Haemosporidians (Plasmodium and Haemoproteus: Haemosporida): new insights from molecular data. International Journal for Parasitology 44, 329338.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. R. and Warwick, R. M. (2001). A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Marine Ecology Progress Series 216, 265278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, E. C. and Remsen, J. V. Jr. (2013). The Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World. No. Ed. 4. Aves Press, Eastborn, UK.Google Scholar
Drovetski, S. V., Aghayan, S. A., Mata, V. A., Lopes, R. J., Mode, N. A., Harvey, J. A. and Voelker, G. (2014). Does the niche-breadth or trade-off hypothesis explain the abundance-occupancy relationship in avian haemosporidia? Molecular Ecology 23, 33223329.Google Scholar
Drummond, A. J., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D. and Rambaut, A. (2012). Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1·7. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29, 19691973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durrant, K. L., Reed, J. L., Jones, P. J., Dallimer, M., Cheke, R. A., McWilliam, A. N. and Fleischer, R. C. (2007). Variation in haematozoan parasitism at local and landscape levels in the red-billed quelea Quelea quelea . Journal of Avian Biology 38, 662671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fjeldså, J. (2003). Patterns of endemism in African birds: how much does taxonomy matter? Ostrich 74, 3038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Longoria, L., Garamszegi, L. Z. and Moller, A. P. (2014). Host escape behavior and blood parasite infections in birds. Behavioral Ecology 111.Google Scholar
Garnham, P. (1950). Blood parasites of east African vertebrates, with a brief description of exo–erythrocytic schizogony of P. pitmani . Parasitology 40, 328337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnham, P. (1966). Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosporidia. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hellgren, O., Waldenström, J., Peréz-Tris, J., Szöll, E., Si, Ö., Hasselquist, D., Krizanauskiene, A., Ottosson, U. and Bensch, S. (2007). Detecting shifts of transmission areas in avian blood parasites – a phylogenetic approach. Molecular Ecology 16, 12811290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntley, J. W. and Voelker, G. (2016). Cryptic diversity in Afro-tropical forests: the systematics and biogeography of the avian genus Bleda . Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 99, 297308.Google Scholar
Iezhova, T. A., Dodge, M., Sehgal, R. N. M., Smith, T. B. and Valkiūnas, G. (2011). New avian Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) from African birds, with a critique of the use of host taxonomic information in hemoproteid classification. Journal of Parasitology 97, 682694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishak, H. D., Dumbacher, J. P., Anderson, N. L., Keane, J. J., Valkiünas, G., Haig, S. M., Tell, L. A., and Sehgal, R. N. M. (2008). Blood parasites in Owls with conservation implications for the Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis). PLoS ONE 3, e2304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishtiaq, F., Beadell, J. S., H.warren, B. and Fleischer, R. C. (2012). Diversity and distribution of avian haematozoan parasites in the western Indian Ocean region: a molecular survey. Parasitology 139, 221231.Google Scholar
Jetz, W. and Rahbek, C. (2002). Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science 297, 15481551.Google Scholar
Karamba, K. I., Kawo, A. H., Dabo, N. T. and Mukhtar, M. D. (2012). A survey or avian malaria parasite (sic) in Kano State, Northern Nigeria. International Journal for Biotechnology and Molecular Biology Research 3, 814.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, C. E. and Smith, T. B. (1988). Blood parasites of birds in Cameroon. Journal of Parasitology 74, 10091013.Google Scholar
Lauron, E. J., Loiseau, C., Bowie, R. C. K., Spicer, G. S., Smith, T. B., Melo, M. and Sehgal, R. N. M. (2015). Coevolutionary patterns and diversification of avian malaria parasites in African sunbirds (Family Nectariniidae). Parasitology 142, 635647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linder, H. P., de Klerk, H. M., Born, J., Burgess, N. D., Fjeldså, J. and Rahbek, C. (2012). The partitioning of Africa: statistically defined biogeographical regions in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Biogeography 39, 11891205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loiseau, C., Valkiūnas, G., Chasar, A., Hutchinson, A., Iezhova, T. and Sehgal, R. N. M. (2010). Spatial variation of haemosporidian parasite infection in African rainforest bird species. Journal of Parasitology 96, 2129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loiseau, C., Harrigan, R. J., Robert, A., Bowie, R. C. K., Thomassen, A., Smith, T. B. and Sehgal, R. (2012). Host and habitat specialization of avian malaria in Africa. Molecular Ecology 21, 431441.Google Scholar
Lutz, H. L., Hochachka, W. M., Engel, J. I., Bell, J. A., Tkach, V. V., Bates, J. M., Hackett, S. J. and Weckstein, J. D. (2015). Parasite prevalence corresponds to host life history in a diverse assemblage of afrotropical birds and haemosporidian parasites. PLoS ONE 10(4), e0121254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsen, M. S., Mcinerney, N., Brightman, H., Ferebee, K., Walsh, T., Mcshea, W. J., Forrester, T. D., Ware, L., Joyner, P. H., Perkins, S. L., Latch, E. K., Yabsley, M. J., Schall, J. J. and Fleischer, R. C. (2016). Hidden in plain sight: cryptic and endemic malaria parasites in North American white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Science Advances.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mata, V. A., da Silva, L. P., Lopes, R. J. and Drovetski, S. V. (2015). The Strait of Gibraltar poses an effective barrier to host-specialised but not to host-generalised lineages of avian Haemosporidia. International Journal of Parasitology 45, 711719.Google Scholar
Meiswinkel, R., Venter, G. J. and Nevill, E. M. (2004). Vectors: Culicoides Spp. Infectious Diseases of Livestock. Oxford University Press, Cape Town, pp. 93136.Google Scholar
Møller, A. P., Garamszegi, L. Z., Peralta-Sánchez, J. M. and Soler, J. J. (2011). Migratory divides and their consequences for dispersal, population size and parasite–host interactions. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24, 17441755.Google Scholar
Okanga, S., Cumming, G. S., Hockey, P. A. R., Nupen, L. and Peters, J. L. (2014). Host specificity and co-speciation in avian Haemosporidia in the Western Cape, South Africa. PLoS ONE 9(2), e86382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olsson-Pons, S., Clark, N. J., Ishtiaq, F. and Clegg, S. M. (2015). Differences in host species relationships and biogeographic influences produce contrasting patterns of prevalence, community composition and genetic structure in two genera of avian malaria parasites in southern Melanesia. Journal of Animal Ecology 84, 985998.Google Scholar
Patz, J. A. and Olson, S. H. (2006). Malaria risk and temperature: influences from global climate change and local land use practices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 56355636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-Tris, J., Hellgren, O., Križanauskiene, A., Waldenström, J., Secondi, J., Bonneaud, C., Fjeldså, J., Hasselquist, D. and Bensch, S. (2007). Within-host speciation of malaria parasites. PLoS ONE 2, e235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R. and Mouillot, D. (2003). Parasite specialization from a phylogenetic perspective: a new index of host specificity. Parasitology 126, 473480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rambaut, A., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D. and Drummond, A. J. (2014). Tracer v1.6. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. and Fallon, S. M. (2002). Diversification and host switching in avian malaria parasites. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269, 885892.Google Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E., Outlaw, D. C., Coelho, M. S., Medeiros, M., Ellis, V. A. and Latta, S. (2014). Species formation by host switching in avian malaria parasites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, 1481614821.Google Scholar
Rifkin, J. L., Nunn, C. L. and Garamszegi, L. Z. (2012). Do animals living in larger groups experience greater parasitism? A meta-analysis. American Naturalist 180, 7082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santiago-Alarcon, D., Palinauskas, V. and Schaefer, H. M. (2012). Diptera vectors of avian Haemosporidian parasites: untangling parasite life cycles and their taxonomy. Biological Reviews 87, 928964.Google Scholar
Sehgal, R. N., Jones, H. I. and Smith, T. B. (2005). Blood parasites of some West African rainforest birds. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 67, 295301.Google Scholar
Sinclair, I. and Ryan, P. (2010). Birds of Africa, South of the Sahara. Struik Nature, Cape Town.Google Scholar
Smith, T. B., H. Thomassen, A., Freedman, A. H., Sehgal, R., Buermann, W., Saatchi, J., Pollinger, S., Milá, B., Pires, D., Valkiūnas, G. and Wayne, R. K. (2011). Patterns of divergence in the olive sunbird (Cyanomitra olivacea) across the African rainforest-savanna ecotone. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 103, 825835.Google Scholar
Svensson-Coelho, M., Blake, J. G., Loiselle, B. A., Penrose, A. S., Parker, P. G. and Ricklefs, R. E. (2013). Diversity, prevalence, and host specificity of avian Plasmodium and Haemoproteus in a western Amazon assemblage. Ornithological Monographs 76, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valkiūnas, G. (2005). Avian Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosporidia. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Valkiūnas, G., Sehgal, R. N., Iezhova, T. A. and Smith, T. B. (2005). Further observations on the blood parasites of birds in Uganda. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 41, 580587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valkiūnas, G., Iezhova, T. A., Loiseau, C., Smith, T. B. and Sehgal, R. N. M. (2009). New malaria parasites of the subgenus Novyella in African rainforest birds, with remarks on their high prevalence, classification and diagnostics. Parasitology Research 104, 10611077.Google Scholar
Waldenström, J., Bensch, S., Kiboi, S., Hasselquist, D. and Ottosson, U. (2002). Cross-species infection of blood parasites between resident and migratory songbirds in Africa. Molecular Ecology 11, 15451554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, M. J., Cosgrove, C. L., Wilkin, T. A., Knowles, S. C. L., Day, K. P., and Sheldon, B. C. (2007). Within-population variation in prevalence and lineage distribution of avian malaria in blue tits, Cyanistes caeruleus . Molecular Ecology 16, 32633273.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Lineages found only within one region, by genus (P = 0·0002).

Figure 1

Table 2. Number of lineages in each region that are endemic to that region and number of lineages found in each region that are shared with other (1 or more) regions (P = 0·0617).

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Biogeographic regions of African avifauna (from Linder et al.2012). Pie charts represent the relative proportions of parasite genera in each region (Grey: Plasmodium, Black: Leucocytozoon; White: Haemoproteus). Numbers in pie charts are the number of infections of each genus.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic reconstruction African avian malaria parasites. Coloured terminal branches correspond to biogeographic regions: Congolian – purple, Southern African – brown, Sudanian – orange, Zambezian – blue, widespread – black. Clades are highlighted to genus: Plasmodium – light grey, Leucocytozoon – white, Haemoproteus – medium grey. Note that branch lengths are depicted as in a cladogram for simplification.

Figure 4

Table 3. Number of infections collected from hosts by host family, and number of lineages from each parasite genus by host family. Note that the number of lineages most often does not add up to the number of infected birds.

Figure 5

Table 4. Host specificity indices by parasite genus.