Introduction
The broad tapeworms (the order Diphyllobothriidea) are parasites of fish-eating mammals and birds, which became infected by ingestion of plerocercoids (second larval stage) in a fish prey. The order currently harbours about 70 species (Kuchta and Scholz, Reference Kuchta, Scholz, Caira and Jensen2017), some of which pose a serious threat to their fish intermediate hosts (Bylund and Andersen, Reference Bylund and Andersen1994; Rahkonen et al., Reference Rahkonen, Aalto, Koski, Sarkka and Juntunen1996). Other species cause human diphyllobothriosis, an intestinal disease with millions of cases worldwide (Chai et al., Reference Chai, Murrell and Lymbery2005). Two autochthonous European species of recently resurrected genus Dibothriocephalus (Lühe, 1899) (see Waeschenbach et al., Reference Waeschenbach, Brabec, Scholz, Littlewood and Kuchta2017) were chosen as models for this study with respect to the different pathogenic effects on their hosts. Dibothriocephalus ditremus (Creplin, 1825) is widespread in Circumboreal region, and its most frequent second intermediate hosts are salmonid and coregonid fishes (see Halvorsen, Reference Halvorsen1970; Valtonen and Julkunen, Reference Valtonen and Julkunen1995). This tapeworm acts as an important ecological driver of population dynamics of wild salmonids (Halvorsen and Andersen, Reference Halvorsen and Andersen1984), and heavy infections caused multiple organ damage in farmed salmons and trouts (Weiland and Meyers, Reference Weiland and Meyers1989; Rodger, Reference Rodger1991; Rahkonen et al., Reference Rahkonen, Aalto, Koski, Sarkka and Juntunen1996). Human broad tapeworm, Dibothriocephalus latus (Linnaeus, 1758), is the most common causative agent of human diphyllobothriosis in Europe, where it currently persists mainly in Russia and in the Alpine lakes region (Králová-Hromadová et al., Reference Králová-Hromadová, Radačovská, Čisovská Bazsalovicsová and Kuchta2021). Plerocercoids are often localized in the muscles of fish hosts and consumption of raw dishes made from European perch (Perca fluviatilis) and Northern pike (Esox lucius) is the most important way of the parasite transmission into human hosts (Gustinelli et al., Reference Gustinelli, Menconi, Prearo, Caffara, Righetti, Scanzio, Raglio and Fioravanti2016). The pathological effect of larvae and adults is mainly determined by mechanical damage of host tissues and activity of chemical substances released into host body. An important role is played by the scolex (head of the tapeworm), which is equipped with 2 specialized muscular attachment organs (bothria), products of secretory apparatus (frontal glands) are released on its tip (Öhman-James, Reference Öhman-James1973) and both bothrial musculature and secretory cell apparatus are closely associated with primitive brain in its anterior part (Gustafsson and Vaihela, Reference Gustafsson and Vaihela1981; Halton and Maule, Reference Halton and Maule2004; Biserova and Kemaeva, Reference Biserova, Kemaeva and Pugachev2012). The nervous and secretory systems can hardly be visualized by conventional histological techniques, and therefore, immunohistochemical methods and immunofluorescent dyes are used in combination with confocal microscopy to study their anatomy and chemical nature. Among diphyllobothriideans, Dibothriocephalus dendriticus (Nitzsch, 1824) has often served as a model species for such studies (e.g. Öhman-James, Reference Öhman-James1968; Gustafsson et al., Reference Gustafsson, Lehtonen and Sundler1986; Gustafsson and Wikgren, Reference Gustafsson and Wikgren1989; Lindholm et al., Reference Lindholm, Reuter and Gustafsson1998; Biserova and Kutyrev, Reference Biserova and Kutyrev2014; Kutyrev et al., Reference Kutyrev, Biserova, Olennikov, Korneva and Mazur2017), while only few data are available for D. ditremus and D. latus (Öhman-James, Reference Öhman-James1973; Barčák et al., Reference Barčák, Yoneva, Sehadová, Oros, Gustinelli and Kuchta2019).
The nervous system of flatworms contains a variety of neuroactive substances including neuropeptides (a diverse group usually consisting of 3–40 amino acid residues), which were recognized as neuromodulators, neurotransmitters or hormones in both invertebrates and vertebrates (Jekely, Reference Jekely2013). Their functional features are often determined by amidation of their carboxy terminal (Bradbury and Smyth, Reference Bradbury and Smyth1991) and some of them were investigated as potential targets for novel anthelminthic drugs (Maule et al., Reference Maule, Mousley, Marks, Day, Thompson, Geary and Halton2002). Specific antibodies against one of these amidated neuropeptides, a tetrapeptide FMRF amide (Phe-Met-Arg-Phe-NH2), were successfully applied as a neuronal immunohistochemical marker in many invertebrate taxa including parasitic flatworms (Fairweather and Halton, Reference Fairweather and Halton1991). However, the peptide itself has never been confirmed in any flatworm taxa, and therefore, anti-FMRF amide antibodies obviously cross-react with structurally similar (FMRF amide-like) peptides of flatworms (Lange et al., Reference Lange, Orchard and Te Brugge1991). The complexity of the nervous system calls for an application of several different markers. An antibody SYNORF1 raised against a phosphoprotein synapsin, a regulator of neurotransmitter vesicles release from presynaptic membranes (Hilfiker et al., Reference Hilfiker, Schweizer, Kao, Czernik, Greengard and Augustine1998; Kao et al., Reference Kao, Porton, Hilfiker, Stefani, Pieribone, DeSalle and Greengard1999), was previously used as a pan-neuronal marker in both planarian and tapeworm species (Cebrià, Reference Cebrià2008; Rozario and Newmark, Reference Rozario and Newmark2015). Anti-tubulin antibodies have been applied for visualization of microtubules in nervous fibres, walls of frontal gland ducts or flame cells of excretory system in our previous study on D. latus (Barčák et al., Reference Barčák, Yoneva, Sehadová, Oros, Gustinelli and Kuchta2019) as well as in other studies (e.g. Moreno et al., Reference Moreno, Casado, Urrea-Paris and Rodriguez-Caabeiro2001; Rozario and Newmark, Reference Rozario and Newmark2015; Kutyrev et al., Reference Kutyrev, Biserova, Olennikov, Korneva and Mazur2017).
The function of the secretory apparatus (frontal glands) in tapeworms has not yet been clearly explained. In general, the secretion might facilitate penetration of the plerocercoids through the host's intestinal wall, migration into its musculature and early adhesion in the intestine of final host (Kuhlow, Reference Kuhlow1953; Öhman-James, Reference Öhman-James1973; Kuperman and Davydov, Reference Kuperman and Davydov1981). The ducts of secretory cells run towards the apical pit in the scolex, where secretory granules are stored in the reservoirs, and released to host tissues (Öhman-James, Reference Öhman-James1973; Kuperman and Davydov, Reference Kuperman and Davydov1981). The ultrastructure of tapeworm secretory cells suggested their capability of protein synthesis (Richards and Arme, Reference Richards and Arme1981; Barčák et al., Reference Barčák, Yoneva, Sehadová, Oros, Gustinelli and Kuchta2019); however, secretory granules inside the ducts are generally unreactive to cytochemical tests (Öhman-James, Reference Öhman-James1973). In the previous study on D. latus, β tubulin immunoreactive (IR) reservoirs of putative secretory glands around apical pit were tagged, but chemical composition of their content remained unknown (Barčák et al., Reference Barčák, Yoneva, Sehadová, Oros, Gustinelli and Kuchta2019). The excretory system of tapeworms, which is not yet fully understood, has an osmoregulatory and/or excretory function performed by protonephridian flame cells, from which ‘waste’ products are released through a system of canals terminated at the end of the body (Webster and Wilson, Reference Webster and Wilson1970; Lumsden and Hildreth, Reference Lumsden, Hildreth, Arme and Pappas1983; Mustafina and Biserova, Reference Mustafina and Biserova2022). Recent data suggested a functional complexity of the excretory system of diphyllobothriideans, because an immunomodulator prostaglandin E2 was detected in the flame cells (Kutyrev et al., Reference Kutyrev, Biserova, Olennikov, Korneva and Mazur2017). The products of glandular apparatus and excretory system represent a major part of a complex and poorly explored mixture of various molecules called secretory/excretory products, which have prominent place in host–parasite relationships and are studied as potential diagnostic markers and immunomodulatory drugs (e.g. Lightowlers and Rickard, Reference Lightowlers and Rickard1988; Harnett, Reference Harnett2014).
The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the functional morphology of infectious larvae (plerocercoids) of 2 broad tapeworms, D. ditremus and D. latus. The novelty of this work was application of multi-marker immunofluorescent labelling and confocal microscopy on whole-mount specimens, in order to capture complex 3-dimensional structure of the scolex. The cross-reactivity of anti-FMRF amide marker is briefly discussed with regards to genome-based prediction of FaRPs (also known as FaLPs, FMRF amide-like peptides) in D. latus.
Materials and methods
The plerocercoids of D. ditremus were isolated from cysts located in the body cavity of brown trout Salmo trutta m. fario from Lake Takvatn (69°6′37″N, 19°4′29″E) and Lake Kalandsvatn (60°16′19″N, 5°23′55″E) in Norway, sampled in October 2017 and August 2018, respectively. The plerocercoids of D. latus were isolated from the musculature of European perch P. fluviatilis from Lake Iseo (45°44′20″N, 10°4′15″E) in Italy, sampled in April 2018. After the isolation, the larvae of both species were rinsed in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer, immediately heat-treated by almost boiling PBS for about 1 min, fixed in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde solution and stored in PBS with 0.03% sodium azide at 4°C (details in Barčák et al., Reference Barčák, Yoneva, Sehadová, Oros, Gustinelli and Kuchta2019). Several specimens of D. ditremus were fixed using standard procedure, i.e. heat-treatment in PBS was omitted. These plerocercoids were used for test of anti-FMRF amide primary antibody's specificity (see below).
The immunofluorescence labelling of 12 and 4 plerocercoids of D. ditremus and D. latus, respectively, was initiated by rinsing in PBS, which was followed by permeabilization by 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS (PBSTrX). The non-specific signal was blocked by the incubation of samples in 5% normal donkey serum (NDS; #ab10352, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in PBSTrX for 2 h. The immunolabelling was performed using polyclonal rabbit anti-FMRF amide IgG antibody (#ab10352, Abcam; diluted 1:1000), monoclonal mouse anti-SYNORF1 (anti-synapsin) IgG2b antibody (clone 3C11, DSHB, Iowa, USA; diluted 1:10) and monoclonal mouse anti-α tubulin and anti-β tubulin IgG1 antibodies (clones 12G10 and E7 – applied individually or as a mixture, both DSHB; diluted 1:10 each) in 5% NDS in PBSTrX for 7 days at 4°C. The unbounded primary antibodies were rinsed off by 3 baths in PBSTrX, while tagged structures were visualized by secondary antibodies donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 and donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555 (#A-21206 and A-31570; both Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA; diluted 1:500) in 5% NDS in PBSTrX for 2 days at 4°C. After rinsing in PBS, the specimens were incubated in nuclear stain Draq5 (#4084, Cell Signalling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA; diluted 1:500) in PBS for 5 min, rinsed and mounted in antifade reagent ProLong® Gold (#9071, CST). Additionally, 4 heat-treated specimens of D. ditremus were used as the negative control, i.e. the same protocol was used for their labelling, but the primary antibodies were omitted. No specific signal was observed for both secondary antibodies (Supplementary file S1). Eight conventionally fixed plerocercoids of D. ditremus were labelled using the same protocol as was used for heat-treated specimens to detect possible false-positive results. As FMRF amide-like IR was identical on both types of samples, the signal on heat-treated specimens is considered specific. It is worthy to mention that heat-treatment caused ‘natural’ relaxation of tapeworm bodies and thus decreased its thickness making it easier to transilluminate in the confocal microscope.
The optical scans were captured by confocal microscope Leica TCS SP5 X equipped with software LAS AF (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim, Germany) and processed as maximum intensity Z-stack projections of multiple optical sections in graphic platform FIJI (NIH, USA) (Schindelin et al., Reference Schindelin, Arganda-Carreras, Frise, Kaynig, Longair, Pietzsch, Preibisch, Rueden, Saalfeld, Schmid, Tinevez, White, Hartenstein, Eliceiri, Tomancak and Cardona2012). The terminology of nervous system follows Richter et al. (Reference Richter, Loesel, Purschke, Schmidt-Rhaesa, Scholtz, Stach, Vogt, Wanninger, Brenneis, Doring, Faller, Fritsch, Grobe, Heuer, Kaul, Moller, Muller, Rieger, Rothe, Stegner and Harzsch2010).
Considering lack of original FMRF amide in flatworms and immunoreactivity of anti-FMRF amide antibodies with FMRF amide-related peptides, structures labelled with this antibody will herein be termed as FMRF amide-like immunoreactive (IR) rather than FMRF amide IR (see also Richter et al., Reference Richter, Loesel, Purschke, Schmidt-Rhaesa, Scholtz, Stach, Vogt, Wanninger, Brenneis, Doring, Faller, Fritsch, Grobe, Heuer, Kaul, Moller, Muller, Rieger, Rothe, Stegner and Harzsch2010). Both anti-α tubulin and anti-β tubulin antibodies were applied individually; however, better results were gained when they were used as the mixture.
Results
Immunofluorescence labelling of Dibothriocephalus ditremus
The nervous system of D. ditremus exhibited FMRF amide-like IR in the bi-lobed brain, 2 main nerve cords, nerve plexus formed around the main cords, sub-tegumental nerve plexus, 3 types of receptor cells and interconnecting neurites (Figs 1A–J and 2A–C). The commissural connection of the brain possessed thin neurites, and commissural neurons (6–9 μm in diameter, n = 5), including single large intensively FMRF amide-like IR neuron (Figs 1A–C and 2B and C). This large neuron (11–17 μm in diameter, n = 6) released 2 dominant neurites, running through the main nerve cords towards posterior part of the body, as well as several thin neurites (Figs 1A–C, 2B and C). Two lobes of the brain, interconnected by the commissure, possessed a dense net of FMRF amide-like IR neurons and their neurites (Fig. 1B). Anteriorly, each lobe was split into dorsal and ventral part, while posteriorly these 2 parts were fused and connected with the main nerve cord. Additionally, the lobe communicated also with the nerve plexus around the main cord (Fig. 1D and E). Each main nerve cord released thin neurites towards the nerve plexus, which surrounded the cord dorsally, ventrally and laterally; thin neurites also run towards body surface and form FMRF amide-like IR sub-tegumental nerve plexus (Fig. 1E).
Four types of receptor cells were identified in the apical part of the scolex, based both on the morphology of their terminals (sensilla) embedded in the tegument and on their immunoreactivity. The sensilla, which were both FMRF amide-like IR and tubulin IR, were ended with (i) a simple fibre (fibre-like type) of approximately same width as a neurite itself (Fig. 1F and G), (ii) a bulb-like enlargement (width 1.27–1.55 μm, n = 3) embedded in the distal cytoplasm of the tegument (Fig. 1H) or (iii) a flatten structure (width 1.1 μm, n = 1) situated just under the basal lamina of the tegument (Fig. 1I). Fibre-like sensilla were the only FMRF amide-like IR type observed on the edge of bothria (Fig. 1J). The fourth type consisted exclusively of tubulin IR sensilla of bulb-like shape (width 1.2–1.7 μm, n = 11), which occurred in the apical part of the scolex. In general, the tubulin IR sensilla were much more numerous than the FMRF amide-like IR sensilla (Fig. 1K).
The synapsin IR was observed mainly in the area of brain lobes and main nerve cords as an aggregation of a point-like signal, which predominantly surrounded these structures (Fig. 2A). A less intensive synapsin IR occurred in both the neurites released from the brain lobes towards the apical pit and in the neurite bundles, which left the lobes and the cords (Fig. 2B and C). The bundles run towards the body surface, where they joined the neuron plexuses (Fig. 2C). In the anterior part of the neck, synapsin IR was observed in the proximity of FMRF amide-like IR main nerve cords, from which numerous FMRF amide-like IR neurites run laterally, but only few of them exhibited co-localization with synapsin IR (Fig. 2D). Longitudinal and transversal minor nerve cords in the neck also showed synapsin IR (Fig. 2A).
The secretory apparatus of D. ditremus also exhibited FMRF amide-like IR. The ducts of secretory cells were observed running laterally to the brain–main nerve cord complex towards an apical area of the scolex (Figs 1A and 3A). The ducts were terminated with large sub-tegumental reservoirs (up to 10 μm in diameter) with granular content (Fig. 3A–D), which was released to the environment through thin tegument-penetrating canals (Fig. 3B and D). Majority of the secretory cell ducts were terminated in the apical pit or in its proximity, while a relatively low number penetrated the tegument more posteriorly (Fig. 3A and C).
The excretory system showed both FMRF amide-like IR and tubulin IR (Fig. 3E–G). The FMRF amide-like IR was observed in tubular structures, i.e. in a network of excretory canals mostly situated in the cortical parenchyma and associated with cell somas (Fig. 3E and G). These canals released collecting ducts, whose funnel-like terminals surrounded tubulin IR flame flagellum (Fig. 3F). These initial structures represented the excretory functional unit – flame cell, also known as protonefridium. In the neck, a pair of FMRF amide-like IR main excretory canals was observed (Fig. 2C).
Immunofluorescence labelling of Dibothriocephalus latus
The nervous system of D. latus exhibited FMRF amide-like IR in the brain, main nerve cords, nerve plexus and neurites around the cords, and in some neurites of receptor cells (Fig. 4A–F). The bi-lobed brain possessed several FMRF amide-like IR commissural neurons, one of which exhibited more intensive signal and larger dimensions (9–13 μm in diameter, n = 3) than the others (7–10 μm, n = 10) (Fig. 4B and C). The lobes of the brain possessed FMRF amide-like IR neuron bodies and neurites (Fig. 4C and D), the latter ran through the main nerve cords towards posterior end of the body. From an anterior part of the lobe, an FMRF amide-like IR neurite of receptor cell ran towards the apical area of the scolex (Fig. 4D).
Four types of sensilla of the receptor cells were observed in D. latus. The FMRF amide-like IR types could be additionally distinguished on the basis of their morphology and localization as (i) a thin fibre-like type, which penetrated the tegument (Fig. 4E), a bulb-like type (width of the bulb 2.4–3.2 μm, n = 5) that was embedded in the distal cytoplasm (Fig. 4D and F) or a flatten type (width 2.4–3.4 μm, n = 3) situated beneath the basal lamina (Fig. 4D). Their neurites usually exhibited co-localization of FMRF amide-like IR and tubulin IR (Fig. 4D–F). However, a large number of the sensilla and their neurites were solely tubulin IR (Fig. 4D). This fourth type occurred in the apical part of the scolex and their bulbs (width 1.6–2.8 μm, n = 14) were embedded in the tegument. The solely tubulin IR sensilla were not uniform considering their morphology, because some of them possessed a central cilium, which was inside their bulb, while in others, the cilium was protruded or it was not observed at all (Fig. 4G).
The ducts of secretory cells showed FMRF amide-like IR in their sub-tegumental reservoirs situated near the apical pit of the scolex, where they occurred side-by-side with a large number of tubulin IR neurites of receptor cells (Fig. 5A and C). Terminal parts of the reservoirs were formed as thin projections, which were directed towards the tegument (Fig. 5C). The excretory system possessed a FMRF amide-like IR cortical network of excretory canals, which were associated with cell nuclei (Fig. 5B). These canals were connected with much smaller collecting ducts, whose funnel-like terminal enlargements surrounded tubulin IR flame flagellum of flame cells (Fig. 5D).
Discussion
Nervous system in the plerocercoids of diphyllobothriidean tapeworms
Species examined in this study shared the general distribution of FMRF amide-like IR in their nervous system; however, some differences were observed in the structure of their brain commissures. Both species possessed a single intensively FMRF amide-like IR commissural neuron, whose immunoreactivity markedly exceeded that of the others, but some variability was observed in an arrangement and a size of perikarya (soma) of these neurons. In D. ditremus, intensively FMRF amide-like IR perikaryon was situated posterior to those of other commissural neurons and its width was almost twice as width of weakly IR perikarya. Unlike its congener, D. latus had an intensively FMRF amide-like IR perikaryon situated more anteriorly, i.e. approximately in the middle of the brain commissure, and its soma was only slightly wider than that of the other commissural neurons. Nevertheless, commissural perikarya markedly exceeded dimensions of neuron somas associated with brain lobes in both species.
Structural differences in the brain commissure were also observed in other broad tapeworms elsewhere, and amidergic, peptidergic and serotonergic types of neurons were immunochemically differentiated (e.g. Gustafsson et al., Reference Gustafsson, Wikgren, Karhi and Schot1985, Reference Gustafsson, Lehtonen and Sundler1986, Reference Gustafsson, Halton, Maule, Reuter and Shaw1994; Gustafsson, Reference Gustafsson1991; Gustafsson and Eriksson, Reference Gustafsson and Eriksson1992). For instance, Gustafsson (Reference Gustafsson1991) observed only single RF amide-like IR large commissural neuron in D. dendriticus, while Biserova et al. (Reference Biserova, Korneva and Polyakova2020) summarized that the brain commissure of D. dendriticus possesses 13 neurons, among which 4 were (FM)RF amide-like IR.
There is not much comparable data for the model tapeworms, D. ditremus and D. latus. Biserova and Kemaeva (Reference Biserova, Kemaeva and Pugachev2012) described ultrastructure of 3 neuron somas in the commissure of D. ditremus. In D. latus, 2 perikarya (erroneously described as 2 commissures) occurred in the commissure, but their FMRF amide-like IR could not be confirmed due to application of a mixture of 3 neuromarkers (anti-FMRF amide, anti-serotonin and anti-synapsin antibodies) (Barčák et al., Reference Barčák, Yoneva, Sehadová, Oros, Gustinelli and Kuchta2019).
As for other members of the order Diphyllobothriidea, Biserova and Gordeev (Reference Biserova and Gordeev2010) found numerous commissural neurons (termed as giant neurons) in Ligula intestinalis (Linnaeus, 1758). Biserova et al. (Reference Biserova, Mustafina and Raikova2022) described these neurons in marine broad tapeworm Pyramicocephalus phocarum (Fabricius, 1780) and concluded that the brain commissure possessing large neuron somas might be characteristic for diphyllobothriidean species. The present data are congruent with this statement, and moreover, the current examination of D. ditremus suggests that intensively FMRF amide-like IR perikaryon in the brain commissure represents a multipolar neuron, i.e. the same type as was observed in D. dendriticus (Gustafsson, Reference Gustafsson1991).
No obvious differences were found between the 2 species described here, considering that the FMRF amide-like IR in 2 brain lobes are connected with main nerve cords, nerve plexuses and neurites of receptor cells, and that their architecture was similar to that of other broad tapeworms. Briefly, each brain lobe of D. ditremus (current study) and D. dendriticus (Gustafsson et al., Reference Gustafsson, Wikgren, Karhi and Schot1985; Biserova and Kutyrev, Reference Biserova and Kutyrev2014) split anteriorly into dorsal and ventral parts, and their neurites run either towards the tegument of inner and outer surface of bothria or to the apical part of the scolex. The main nerve cords exhibited the same pattern of FMRF amide-like IR as was repeatedly recorded in D. dendriticus (Gustafsson et al., Reference Gustafsson, Wikgren, Karhi and Schot1985; Gustafsson, Reference Gustafsson1991; Biserova et al., Reference Biserova, Kuryrev and Jensen2014). Slightly different situation was reported in P. phocarum (Biserova et al., Reference Biserova, Mustafina and Raikova2022), where both the FMRF amide-like IR neuron somas and their neurites occurred on the periphery of the main cords (and of the brain lobes, as well) rather than inside of these structures as observed in the current study and in previously published data on D. dendriticus (Gustafsson et al., Reference Gustafsson, Wikgren, Karhi and Schot1985; Gustafsson, Reference Gustafsson1991; Biserova et al., Reference Biserova, Kuryrev and Jensen2014). In both diphyllobothriidean species examined in this study, FMRF amide-like IR nervous plexuses were situated close to the body surface (subtegumental plexus) and another plexus surrounded the main nerve cords. This FMRF amide-like IR network of neurites might serve as innervation of main longitudinal muscle bundles, because well-developed peptidergic plexuses occur near the musculature of flatworms (e.g. see review in Halton and Maule, Reference Halton and Maule2004).
In D. ditremus and D. latus examined in this study, the receptor cells were recognized based on their sensilla embedded in the tegument and the neurites connected with the brain lobes or nearby nerve plexus in the scolex parenchyma. These tapeworms possessed sensilla distributed both in the apical area and on the bothrial surface, and those showing FMRF amide-like IR were much less numerous than tubulin IR sensilla. Morphologically, 3 types of the FMRF amide-like IR sensilla (fibre-like, bulb-like and flatten type), and a single type (bulb-like) of tubulin IR sensilla were observed in both species. However, the size of these bulb-like sensilla was different comparing D. ditremus and D. latus, as those of the latter were almost twice as wide as the sensilla of the former. Moreover, the tubulin IR bulb-like sensilla situated near the apical pit of D. latus differed in their internal structure, as some of them had an external cilium of different length, others contained an internal structure resembling the rootlet of microtriches, whereas the rest of the sensilla seemed to lack central tubulin IR structures.
Several types of sensilla distinguished by their ultrastructure (e.g. presence of the cilium and central rootlet) and their position in the tegument were recognized in diphyllobothriideans by transmission electron microscopy (e.g. Mustafina and Biserova, Reference Mustafina and Biserova2017). Biserova and Kemaeva (Reference Biserova, Kemaeva and Pugachev2012) recorded both ciliated and un-ciliated sensilla near the apical pit of D. ditremus, while Barčák et al. (Reference Barčák, Yoneva, Sehadová, Oros, Gustinelli and Kuchta2019) observed only un-ciliated sensilla with central rootlet situated near basal lamina of the tegument of D. latus. Higher variability of this structure was described in the scolex tegument of D. dendriticus by Kutyrev et al. (Reference Kutyrev, Biserova, Olennikov, Korneva and Mazur2017), who recognized 4 types of sensilla. Two ciliated types differed with each other by the length of the cilium, while un-ciliated types were distinguished based on the presence or absence of the central rootlet of microtubules. Similarity between these ultrastructural observations and the current data suggests that immunofluorescent techniques can also provide useful information about the system of sensilla on the diphyllobothriidean tapeworms, especially considering their spatial distribution.
Only few data are available on synapsin IR in tapeworms. The immunoreactivity of SYNORF1 (i.e. the same neuronal marker as used in the current study) was tested in cyclophyllidean tapeworms Hymenolepis diminuta (Rudolphi, 1819) by Rozario and Newmark (Reference Rozario and Newmark2015), who observed specific signal in both newly excysted juveniles and adults. The synapsin IR occurred in the brain, the neurites around the suckers and the rostellum, and posteriorly, it was captured in the longitudinal and transversal nerve cords and in a proximity of genital organs (Rozario and Newmark, Reference Rozario and Newmark2015). Our observations on the plerocercoids of D. ditremus revealed synapsin IR in the brain lobes, main nerve cords and the neurites running towards the body surface. In the anterior part of main nerve cord, synapsin-IR occurred around the FMRF amide-like IR neurite, while posteriorly, the main nerve cords seemed to be thinner in diameter and both signals almost co-localize. In general, synapsin-IR exhibited similar distribution as FMRF amide-like IR, except the fact that the former was not observed in perikarya of our specimens. The current data represent the first known record of synapsin IR in diphyllobothriidean tapeworms.
Secretory gland apparatus and excretory system
To date, the secretory cell ducts of D. ditremus and D. latus have been studied mainly by transmission electron microscopy (Andersen, Reference Andersen1975; Kuperman and Davydov, Reference Kuperman and Davydov1981; Biserova and Kemaeva, Reference Biserova, Kemaeva and Pugachev2012; Barčák et al., Reference Barčák, Yoneva, Sehadová, Oros, Gustinelli and Kuchta2019). The cytoplasm of these secretory cells contains well-developed granular endoplasmatic reticulum, which together with the presence of numerous mitochondria, ribosomes and secretory vesicles suggests active protein synthesis. The secretory cell bodies form a complex syncytial structure, which sends large dense vesicles (up to 1000 nm) through ducts reinforced by peripheral microtubules into subtegumental reservoirs near the apical pit of the scolex (Kuperman and Davydov, Reference Kuperman and Davydov1981). Finally, thin projections of the reservoirs penetrate the tegument and release the vesicles into an environment via eccrine secretion (Kuperman and Davydov, Reference Kuperman and Davydov1982). However, a chemical composition of these secretory vesicles is still poorly known in tapeworms, because granules were mostly unreactive to cytochemical tests (Öhman-James, Reference Öhman-James1973). A clue may be provided by the immunogold labelling of tapeworm nervous system, because similar large dense vesicles (>140 nm) in the neurites of flatworms were FaRPs IR (Reuter and Gustafsson, Reference Reuter and Gustafsson1989; Brennan et al., Reference Brennan, Halton, Maule and Shaw1993; Halton et al., Reference Halton, Maule, Brennan, Shaw, Stoitsova and Johnston1994). Therefore, the large dense vesicles in the ducts of the secretory cells, which share similar ultrastructure with FaRPs IR vesicles in the nervous system, could also be amidergic in nature. This assumption is supported by the present data based on an examination of whole-mount specimens, because FMRF amide-like IR was observed in the ducts of secretory cells, especially in their subtegumental reservoirs. The ducts originated from the posterior part of the scolex, ran laterally to the brain towards the apical part of the scolex and opened into and near to the apical pit, where large reservoirs were formed under the tegument. The FMRF amide-like IR also occurs in the apical pit itself, which may possibly represent an aggregation of amidergic secretory products of these cells. The current data on D. ditremus and D. latus thus update the knowledge on the spatial distribution of the secretory gland apparatus (i.e. frontal glands) and the chemical nature of its secretion in 2 broad tapeworm species.
Most of immunohistochemical examinations of tapeworms have focused on their nervous system, while the excretory system has remained fairly neglected. A rare exception is the work of Rozario and Newmark (Reference Rozario and Newmark2015), who labelled the excretory system of adult H. diminuta by several antibodies and lectins (an anti-FaRP marker was not used), and depicted its microanatomy from flame cells to main excretory canals. Considering diphyllobothriideans, most of the available data were obtained on the sectioned specimens of both adult and plerocercoids of D. dendriticus, in which immunoreactivity against histidine–isoleucin peptide, gastrin, NADPH diaphorase and collagen were captured in or near the wall of main excretory canals (Gustafsson et al., Reference Gustafsson, Lehtonen and Sundler1986; Lindroos and Still, Reference Lindroos and Still1990; Lindholm et al., Reference Lindholm, Reuter and Gustafsson1998). Among other markers, anti-FMRF amide antibodies were used to label both adult and plerocercoids of D. dendriticus, but the specific signal in the excretory system was not observed (Gustafsson et al., Reference Gustafsson, Wikgren, Karhi and Schot1985, Reference Gustafsson, Lehtonen and Sundler1986). In the recent work of Biserova et al. (Reference Biserova, Mustafina and Malakhov2021) the network of excretory canals in plerocercoids of P. phocarum was described as a syncytial structure with cell nuclei associated with the canal walls, similarly as was observed in this work. In D. ditremus and D. latus characterized herein, the FMRF amide-like IR occurred in well-developed network of excretory canals in cortical parenchyma as well as in collecting ducts associated with flame cells. However, these observations did not allow us to decide whether the immunoreactivity is caused by structural peptides in the wall of the excretory system or by ‘waste’ molecules, which are going to be released into the tapeworm's environment.
A cross-reactivity of anti-FMRF amide antibodies and their target (neuro)peptide antigens in Dibothriocephalus spp.
The anti-FMRF amide antibodies obviously cross-react in flatworms, because the original FMRF amide has never been confirmed in these invertebrates. The target antigens for these antibodies are some molecules structurally similar to this mollusc tetrapeptide, most probably those with –RF amide-terminated carboxy end (Lange et al., Reference Lange, Orchard and Te Brugge1991). This amino acid residue thus seems to be the specific epitope responsible for FMRF amide-like IR in flatworms. As knowledge about structural variability of these amidated peptides is limited in tapeworms, their primary structure in diphyllobothriideans could only be estimated based on their amino acid sequences known in other tapeworms, or predicted from available genomic and transcriptomic data.
To date, only 2 peptides with –RF amide terminal were exactly determined in tapeworms, both in cyclophyllidean Moniezia expansa (Rudolphi, 1810). The first of them, the hexapeptide GNFFRF amide, belongs to the FaRPs peptide family and the second, 39-amino acid residue peptide terminated with –FAIIGRPRF amide sequence is related to neuropeptide F (NPF) family (Maule et al., Reference Maule, Shaw, Halton, Thim, Johnston, Fairweather and Buchanan1991, Reference Maule, Shaw, Halton and Thim1993b). These 2 peptides were immunocytochemically confirmed as the antigens for anti-FMRF amide antibodies (Maule et al., Reference Maule, Halton, Shaw and Johnston1993a, Reference Maule, Shaw, Halton and Thim1993b), and therefore, their structural analogues in other tapeworms most probably also cross-react in a similar way. Additionally, 3 possible precursors of NPFs, which coded –GR[P/A]R[F/Y]amide-terminated peptides, were predicted in M. expansa (McVeigh et al., Reference McVeigh, Mair, Atkinson, Ladurner, Zamanian, Novozhilova, Marks, Day and Maule2009).
Although no –RF amide-terminated peptide has been directly isolated from any broad tapeworm, 3 gene precursors of such peptides were predicted in the genome of D. latus. The first of them coded GNIFRF amide, which possessed 1 amino acid substitution (GN[I/F]FRF amide) compared with FaRP of M. expansa; the second one coded 40-residue NPF terminated with –FALIGRPRF amide, which also differs only by a single substitution (–FA[L/I]IGRPRFamide) regarding terminal nonapeptide of the cyclophyllidean NPF; the third precursor coded 17-residue-long peptide (–WRPHSRF amide) from Luqin family, another group of invertebrate neuropeptides (Shyamala et al., Reference Shyamala, Fisher and Scheller1986; Koziol et al., Reference Koziol, Koziol, Preza, Costabile, Brehm and Castillo2016). Structural similarities between anti-FMRF antibody-binding peptides in M. expansa and –RF amide-terminated peptides predicted in D. latus genome suggested that the latter might be responsible for FMRF amide-like IR observed in our specimens.
The FMRF amide-like IR of the nervous system in our specimens of D. ditremus and D. latus corresponded with the fact that all of above-mentioned peptides are known as neuroactive substances (Shyamala et al., Reference Shyamala, Fisher and Scheller1986; Maule et al., Reference Maule, Shaw, Halton, Thim, Johnston, Fairweather and Buchanan1991, Reference Maule, Shaw, Halton and Thim1993b). However, the secretory gland apparatus and the excretory system of both D. ditremus and D. latus also exhibited FMRF amide-like IR, which can be attributed to either (i) an occurrence of above-mentioned (neuro)peptides in the secretory and excretory systems or (ii) synthesis/release of other, currently unknown short peptides, which are probably ended with –RF amide carboxy terminal. Future application of specific antibody markers synthesized against predicted peptides could elucidate the distribution of these molecules in tapeworms and help to understand the complexity of their nervous system and secretory/excretory apparatus.
Supplementary material
To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182023000306.
Data availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary materials.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Martina Orosová and Alžbeta Radačovská (the Institute of Parasitology, SAS, Košice, Slovakia), Andrea Gustinelli (Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy), and Per-Arne Amundsen, Rune Knudsen and Roar Kristoffersen (Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway) for their help with fish collections.
Author's contribution
D. B., I. K.-H. and M. O. conceived the study. D. B., I. K.-H., E. Č. B. and M. S. collected the fish, isolated and fixed the parasites. D. B. and A. A. M. performed CLSM examination. D. B. wrote the first draft version. All authors provided input on further drafts and approved the final manuscript.
Financial support
This study was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under contract APVV-15-0004; bilateral project of the Slovak Academy of Sciences-Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (SAS-MOST JRP 2016/7).
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical standards
Not applicable.