Vitamin D has important roles in both the skeleton and non-skeletal tissues. In addition to the role of vitamin D in skeletal metabolism, Holick(Reference Holick1) recently reviewed its potential role in common cancers, autoimmune disease, infectious diseases and CVD. A number of population studies have reported on low levels of vitamin D in the community(Reference Hanley and Davison2). Vitamin D status has been reported in New Zealand children from a range of ethnic groups(Reference Rockell, Skeaff, Williams and Green3). The vitamin D levels of children are generally low, with the lowest values in Māori and Pacific children and in obese children. In addition, the levels of vitamin D are lower in girls than in boys and lower in winter than in summer. It is likely that vitamin D deficiency will track into adulthood but longitudinal studies are lacking. Vitamin D3 has been shown to be inversely associated with body fatness across the life cycle(Reference Smotkin-Tangorra, Purushothaman, Gupta, Nejati, Anhalt and Ten4, Reference Snijder, van Dam, Visser, Deeg, Dekker, Bouter, Seidell and Lips5).
One of the challenges of improving vitamin D levels is that vitamin D sources are limited to sunlight exposure, dietary intake and dietary supplements. Natural sources of vitamin D are constrained, as the range of foods containing vitamin D is limited and sunlight exposure is diminishing(Reference Holick6). Exposure to the sun is now regarded as a health risk particularly for skin disorders. In addition, children with darker skin need longer contact with sunlight for effective vitamin D production, and sunlight is further limited in winter(Reference Kimlin, Downs and Parisi7, Reference Rockell, Green and Skeaff8). While it is possible for individuals to take vitamin D supplements, at public health level another option is the fortification of foods with vitamin D. One mechanism to achieve this is through vitamin-D-fortified milk.
In the Waikato region of New Zealand, as part of a through-school nutrition and activity programme known as Project Energize(Reference Graham, Appleton, Rush, McLennan, Reed and Simmons9), younger children in eleven low-decile primary schools received vitamin-D-fortified, fat-depleted, high-Ca milk. This was provided to the original Project Energize programme schools, not to the control schools. From January 2007, the original Project Energize control schools also became programme schools, with the exception that the children in those schools did not receive milk in school, while milk supplementation continued in the original Project Energize programme schools. This created the opportunity to evaluate vitamin D status in two groups of schools, now matched for overall nutrition and activity initiatives, differing only by through-school supplemental milk intake. Given that the milk being provided was low in fat (specifically saturated fat) and high in Ca, this gave additional potential for comparing blood lipid profiles.
The aim of our study was to evaluate levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (vitamin D3) and HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), and the ratio of HDL-C to LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), in schoolchildren receiving vitamin-D-fortified, fat-depleted, high-Ca milk in schools. Our hypotheses were that: (i) Year 3 schoolchildren in the Project Energize community have low vitamin D levels; (ii) vitamin D levels may be improved by supplementing children’s diet with vitamin-D-fortified, Ca-enriched, low-fat milk; and (iii) low-fat milk may have an effect on the levels of cardioprotective HDL-C in this cohort.
Experimental methods
The candidate study population included eleven low-decile primary schools involved in Project Energize(Reference Graham, Appleton, Rush, McLennan, Reed and Simmons9) receiving daily supplementary milk, and eleven decile-matched schools not receiving supplementary milk matched with respect to school size, ethnicity, rurality and socio-economic status. Schools were located between latitude 37°34′S and 38°22′S in the Waikato region of the North Island of New Zealand. For two years prior to the study, Tetrapaks™ containing 300 ml of unflavoured supplemental milk (Anchor Mega Milk, Table 1) were supplied chilled and free of charge to the schools by Fonterra Brands New Zealand Ltd for consumption by the children every school day. Milk was usually consumed mid-morning, but always by midday. Project Energize field workers monitored compliance directly with school staff on a weekly basis. In many cases milk was drunk in class under direct supervision. Individual student’s daily intake was not directly recorded, but class intake of milk was indirectly assessed by monitoring milk returns.
RDI, Recommended Daily Intake(16).
Ethical approval was obtained from the Northern Y Health ethics committee. Where schools agreed to participate, Year 3 children and their parents were approached and offered the opportunity to become involved in the study. Verbal consent was obtained from the children and written informed consent from the parents. Testing occurred in August 2007, which is the end of winter in New Zealand.
Ethnicity was self-reported from a constrained list of options, including European, Māori, Pacific Islander, Chinese, Indian or Other. Ethnicity of the four grandparents was also asked with the same options. For analysis with regard to skin pigmentation, we used a binary coding convention, with New Zealand European (all four grandparents European and therefore essentially pale skin) and all others (essentially darker skin).
On a school day at the school between 08.00 and 09.30 hours, children’s fasting blood samples were obtained by a trained phlebotomist. Thirty minutes prior to sampling a topical anaesthetic cream (Amethocaine 4 % w/w; Smith and Nephew, New Zealand) was applied to the antecubital area. Blood drawn into evacuated tubes was immediately placed on ice, for transport to the laboratory. All blood was processed for analysis within 120 min of sampling and analysed at a single laboratory (Waikato Hospital laboratory), a facility accredited by International Accreditation New Zealand.
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (vitamin D3) was determined using a RIA kit (DiaSorin; Immunodiagnostics, St Peters, Australia), referenced to standards and averaged duplicates reported. Total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C and TAG were determined using a homogeneous enzymatic colorimetric system (Modular P800; Roche, Auckland, New Zealand). LDL-C was then derived using the formula: LDL-C = [TC−(TAG/2·2) − HDL-C]. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) was determined using a solid-phase, two-site chemiluminescent assay (Immulite 2000; Siemens, Auckland, New Zealand). Intact PTH levels were analysed only if the vitamin D3 level was less than 60 nmol/l. Height, weight and percentage body fat (by bioimpedance) of the children were measured as previously described(Reference Graham, Appleton, Rush, McLennan, Reed and Simmons9).
Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical software package version 14 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data were tested for normality and outliers. Blood parameters other than HDL-C:LDL-C ratio were normally distributed. Two-tailed Student’s t test (unpaired) was thus generally used to assess differences between males and females and between control and milk schools, and the Mann–Whitney U test was used to assess for differences in HDL-C:LDL-C by treatment. Bivariate Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess associations between percentage body fat and vitamin D3. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to examine differences in serum vitamin D3 between gender, control and milk schools and by skin colour after adjusting for percentage body fat. Results are presented as means and standard deviations, effect size and 95 % confidence intervals of differences between means. P < 0·05 was chosen to represent statistical significance.
Results
Eleven schools were receiving milk, of which ten agreed to participate. From eleven potential control schools matched by school size, ethnicity and rurality, eight agreed to participate. Year 3 children were invited to participate; 118 and 106 children respectively consented to testing, some of whom declined blood testing, were not fasting or for whom blood testing was unsuccessful, leaving eighty-nine children from milk schools and eighty-three children from control schools with blood results for analysis. The measured children were similar in age, sex, ethnicity and body composition parameters (Table 2). Boys had less percentage fat than girls (P < 0·0001).
E/M/O, European/Māori/Other; IOTF, International Obesity Taskforce; grade −1/0/1/2, thin/normal weight/overweight/obeseReference Cole, Bellizzi, Flegal and Dietz(29).
*Significantly different from that of males (independent t test, effect size 0·76): P < 0·0001.
The independent t test with equal variances demonstrated that serum vitamin D3 and HDL-C in the milk group were higher (Table 3), but LDL-C, TC and TC:HDL-C ratio were not different from those in the control group. While HDL-C:LDL-C ratio was not normally distributed, the Mann–Whitney U test demonstrated that the ratio was higher in the milk group.
TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; LCL-C, LDL cholesterol; IQR, interquartile range.
*Two-tailed independent t test, equal variances.
†Mann–Whitney U test.
More than 80 % of the children we tested, with more in the control group, had a low vitamin D3 level (mean: 44 nmol/l).
More control children were vitamin D insufficient (<37·5 nmol/l) than milk children (control 32/83 (38·6 %) v. milk 18/89 (20·2 %); Pearson’s χ 2 = 7·00, P = 0·008). One child in the control group was clearly vitamin D deficient at 13 nmol/l. In the total sample of 172 children, 140 (81·4 %) were below the lower limit of the reference range for the local laboratory (60 nmol/l); seventy-two (86·7 %) controls and sixty-eight (76·4 %) of the milk group (P = 0·12). Using a vitamin D threshold of 50 nmol/l, sixty (72·3 %) controls and forty-nine (55·1 %) of the milk group were below the threshold (P = 0·019).
Finally, while we used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey criteria for vitamin D deficiency(Reference Hanley and Davison2), i.e. <37·5 nmol/l, levels as low as 25 nmol/l have been used elsewhere(Reference El-Hajj Fuleihan, Nabulsi, Choucair, Salamoun, Hajj Shahine, Kizirian and Tannous10); applying the latter criterion, seven of the control children would be regarded as vitamin D deficient, compared with one of the milk children. Post hoc analysis revealed that child, and the five other children with the lowest values for milk schools, to come from a single milk school, where it happened that there were significant compliance issues with drinking milk. This was not an issue with the other milk schools, and for all schools the milk was supplied and maintained chilled. Commentary from some schools did suggest that younger children had difficulties with drinking the full 300 ml volume.
Separately, we explored the relationship between vitamin D3 levels and other parameters. There was no difference between sexes for vitamin D3. There was a negative association between vitamin D3 and percentage body fat adjusted for sex (r = −0·16, 95 % CI −0·01, −0·30, P = 0·03). Vitamin D3 levels were significantly different between the two skin pigmentation groups, European v. Non-European (mean (sd): 63 (15) v. 44 (13) nmol/l, P < 0·0001).
Table 4 shows the unadjusted mean vitamin D3 levels of Year 3 children by group. The F and P values were derived from ANCOVA after adjusting for body percentage fat. Cell sizes exceeded thirteen for all comparisons and the variance ratio was less than 1:2. There was no difference by sex (P = 0·161) or interaction of sex with treatment or skin colour, and therefore further analysis excluded this grouping. The difference between marginal means for skin pigmentation (European v. other) was 19 nmol/l (95 % CI 14, 25, P < 0·0001). In addition, the difference in marginal means between milk and control schools was 6 nmol/l (95 % CI 0, 1, P = 0·05).
PTH was analysed only for children with vitamin D3 level below 60 nmol/l (n 138). Within that constraint, there was a negative association between vitamin D3 levels and PTH levels (r = –0·32, 95 % CI 0·16, 0·46, P < 0·0001. With an upper limit of PTH set at 6.1 pmol/l, seven children had elevated PTH and their mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was 33 nmol/l (median 33, range 13–51 nmol/l).
Discussion
In our study population mean serum vitamin D3 was low in Year 3 children in low-decile schools in late winter months. Vitamin D levels were not associated with sex but were associated with skin pigmentation, percentage body fat and consumption of vitamin-D-fortified milk. In addition, the milk-supplemented group had a significantly better cardioprotective lipid profile.
Consensus is lacking on the optimal serum levels of vitamin D; however, the Australian and New Zealand position statement(Reference Munns, Zacharin and Rodda11) and other expert views(12) recommend paediatric and adult levels should be at least 50 nmol/l. Holick, citing other biochemical evidence, argues that relative insufficiency extends to 72 nmol/l, with optimal levels above 75 nmol/l. Vitamin D intoxication has been observed when serum levels are greater than 374 nmol/l(Reference Holick1).
A number of population studies report low serum levels of vitamin D, including in New Zealand(Reference Rockell, Skeaff, Williams and Green3, Reference Rockell, Green and Skeaff8, Reference Scragg, Holdaway, Singh, Metcalf, Baker and Dryson13). There is no mandatory fortification of foods with vitamin D in New Zealand and for the few foods allowed fortification, the level is low. Two natural sources of vitamin D in the New Zealand diet are eggs and fish. The National Children’s Nutrition Survey(14) reports that only 62 % and 37 % of children eat these foods once weekly or more, so it is likely that dietary intake is low and we know of no reason why intake would differ by treatment or sunlight as the geographical locations were not different. Our data showed that the majority of children (and more so in the control group) had low vitamin D3 levels, and that 38·4 % of the control group had vitamin D insufficiency (<37·5 nmol/l), consistent with previous New Zealand research at a similar time of year(Reference Rockell, Green and Skeaff8). If lower vitamin D levels are associated with short- and long-term morbidity, then these data, in common with other studies, demonstrate proof of need.
Vitamin D levels can be maintained through either dietary intake or sun exposure. The Australian New Zealand nutrient reference values for children recommend an Adequate Intake (AI) of 5 μg/d with an upper level of 80 μg/d(15), with a previously published Recommended Daily Intake (RDI) of 10 μg/d(16). A recent review of vitamin D supplementation trials by Hathcock et al.(Reference Hathcock, Shao, Vieth and Heaney17) concluded that in healthy adults a vitamin D dose ≥250 mg/d showed no evidence of toxicity, so the risk of over-supplementation is minimal. Optimal measures of vitamin D3 concentration in the blood have traditionally been validated by biomarkers of bone mineral density and other measures of bone health. If a level of 75–100 nmol/l were the target range, then for adults an intake of 25 μg/d may be necessary in no less than 50 % of the population to bring serum vitamin D3 to above 75 nmol/l(Reference Bischoff-Ferrari, Giovannucci, Willett, Dietrich and Dawson-Hughes18).
The Australia New Zealand consensus(Reference Munns, Zacharin and Rodda11) states that ‘most healthy children in Australia and New Zealand receive enough sunlight exposure to maintain adequate vitamin D levels’, but then states that ‘[in New Zealand] 50 % of all children [have] serum 25 OHD concentrations less than 50 nmol/l’. That consensus also reports that while regular sunlight exposure can prevent vitamin D deficiency, the safe exposure time for children is unknown. Controlled sun exposure is one of the standard recommendations for optimising vitamin D content(Reference Holick19); however, there are conflicting messages related to skin damage and skin cancer risk(Reference Moan, Porojnicu, Dahlback and Setlow20). Sun block also inhibits vitamin D3 synthesis by up to 98 %(Reference Holick19), and paradoxically UVB light, as well as promoting synthesis of dehydrocholesterol to previtamin D3, also breaks down previtamin D3 and vitamin D3 to inactive metabolites(Reference Holick21).
The challenge of obtaining adequate vitamin D3 though sun exposure is greater for darker-skinned people, and this is strongly reinforced by our data and others(Reference Norman22). People with darker skin may need more sun exposure than is practicable, with additional challenges provided by the geographic location, cultural norms and the weather patterns particularly in winter(Reference Rockell, Green and Skeaff8, Reference Norman22, Reference Kimlin, Olds and Moore23). Both of our study groups were involved in a programme encouraging outdoor activity, but vitamin D3 levels remained low albeit that it was winter. It is also less likely that the parents of children in low-decile schools would ordinarily be aware of the need for or be able to access vitamin D supplementation.
Among the advantages of delivering vitamin D in Ca-enriched low-fat milk is that vitamin D, after conversion to the active metabolite vitamin D3, will promote Ca absorption from the gut in preference to mobilising Ca from bone. An additional benefit for the children receiving milk in our study was an improvement in their cardioprotective lipid profile. Mechanisms by which Ca-enriched milk may promote a long-term change in lipids include an inhibition of the absorption of fat by calcium phosphate, increased binding and excretion of bile acids, and increased lipolysis and fat oxidation(Reference Lorenzen, Nielsen, Holst, Tetens, Rehfeld and Astrup24, Reference Major, Alarie, Dore, Phouttama and Tremblay25). Vitamin D3 levels are inversely related to fatness and children in lower-decile schools tend to have higher rates of overweight and obesity(14). Furthermore, in a similar New Zealand population an increase in percentage body fat and lean mass was shown to be related to increased TC and HDL-C, respectively(Reference Rush, Scragg, Schaaf, Juranovich and Plank26).
Our study has a number of limitations. The design was cross-sectional and baseline blood measurements were not made. An opportunity arose when vitamin-D-fortified, low-fat and high-Ca milk was being supplied to only one of two groups of matched low-decile schools in Project Energize. Our blood sampling was done in late winter, in a predominantly darker-skinned sample. This meant it was unlikely that sun exposure would have a major impact on vitamin D3 levels. While children may have received foods high in vitamin D in the home environment, vary in their sun exposure or have been receiving vitamin D supplementation, we have no reason to believe that the usual intake of the control and intervention children would vary at home. Neither group had any restriction on the type of milk consumed at home; however, in the New Zealand setting, most commercial milks are not fortified with vitamin D and the fortified milk is sold as a premium product at higher price. Finally, there is no mandatory requirement for fortification with vitamin D in the commercial food industry, and voluntary fortification is largely limited to milk products. In addition, our binary categorisation of skin colour is not a robust measure. A number of children had grandparents of mixed ethnicity – European was classified when all grandparents were of European origin – the other ethnicities would vary in skin colour and therefore potential ability to synthesise vitamin D3.
The milk supplied in the schools included the maximum amount of vitamin D (1.5 μg/300 ml) allowed by New Zealand food standard 1.3.2. This is 15 % of the current RDI and 30 % of the AI in new Australasian guidelines(15). However, we saw a statistically significant difference in both vitamin D3 levels and vitamin D insufficiency rates in the two groups, which is likely to be of clinical significance. We believe this demonstrates both proof of concept (in that vitamin-D-fortified milk was able to be supplied and was consumed by schoolchildren) and proof of efficacy (in that there was biochemically demonstrable impact). Separately, consideration should be given to increasing the maximum allowable level of vitamin D in fortified foods.
To date, there have been no longitudinal studies to determine whether low childhood vitamin D levels are associated with increased risks of morbidity in adults. However, this is biologically plausible given that: (i) low vitamin D levels in childhood causes rickets in younger children and poor bone mineralisation over time; (ii) low vitamin D level in adulthood is associated with a range of morbidities; (iii) there are plausible biological mechanisms for low vitamin D having multi-system cellular effects(Reference Chatterjee27); (iv) the risk factors for low childhood and adult vitamin D levels are similar; and (v) low vitamin D levels are likely to be chronic across the life span(Reference Ben-Shlomo and Kuh28).
There are difficulties in improving vitamin D levels using strategies such as: (i) providing vitamin D as a supplement; (ii) increasing intake of vitamin-D-containing foods; and (iii) ensuring adequate but safe sun exposure. These are all more challenging in economically deprived communities. Provision of vitamin-D-fortified, Ca-enriched, fat-reduced milk in schools appears to be a safe and effective means of improving vitamin D levels for school-aged children.
Conclusions
Vitamin D3 levels were low in low-decile Year 3 schoolchildren in midwinter. Levels were improved with vitamin-D-fortified milk, and the proportion of children who had vitamin D insufficiency was reduced. Mean vitamin D3 levels were still below the recommended normal range. HDL-C levels and HDL-C:LDL-C were improved in the milk-supplemented group. This supports the supply of vitamin-D-fortified, Ca-enriched, fat-reduced milk in schools.
Acknowledgements
The authors are not aware of any conflict of interest. The study was made possible by funding from Waikato Medical Research Foundation, the Waikato District Health Board, and the Health Research Council. D.G., J.C., G.K., S.M. and E.R. all contributed to the study design and writing. D.G. and G.K. undertook the field work. G.K. and E.R. undertook data management. E.R., D.G. and G.K. undertook data analysis.