Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:13:04.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Your theory of the evolution of morality depends upon your theory of morality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2013

David Kirkby ,
Wolfram Hinzen  and
John Mikhail
David Kirkby
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Durham University, Durham DH1 3HN, United Kingdom. [email protected]@durham.ac.ukhttp://www.dur.ac.uk/philosophy/staff/?id=4296
Wolfram Hinzen
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Durham University, Durham DH1 3HN, United Kingdom. [email protected]@durham.ac.ukhttp://www.dur.ac.uk/philosophy/staff/?id=4296
John Mikhail
Affiliation:
Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC 20001. [email protected]://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/mikhail/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Baumard et al. attribute to humans a sense of fairness. However, the properties of this sense are so underspecified that the evolutionary account offered is not well-motivated. We contrast this with the framework of Universal Moral Grammar, which has sought a descriptively adequate account of the structure of the moral domain as a precondition for understanding the evolution of morality.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 94 - 95
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chomsky, N. (2007) Of minds and language. Biolinguistics 1:1009–27.Google Scholar
Hinzen, W. (in press) Narrow syntax and the language of thought. Philosophical Psychology.Google Scholar
Kirkby, D. & Mikhail, J. (in preparation) The linguistic analogy. Philosophy Compass.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. (2011) Elements of moral cognition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar