Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:09:20.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Programming maternal and child overweight and obesity in the context of undernutrition: current evidence and key considerations for low- and middle-income countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2017

Lindsay M Jaacks*
Affiliation:
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, 665 Huntington Avenue, Building 1, Room 1221, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Justine Kavle
Affiliation:
Maternal and Child Survival Program, Washington, DC, USA Maternal, Newborn, Child Health and Nutrition (MNCHN) Program, PATH, Washington, DC, USA Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
Abigail Perry
Affiliation:
Department for International Development, London, UK
Albertha Nyaku
Affiliation:
Maternal, Newborn, Child Health and Nutrition (MNCHN) Program, PATH, Washington, DC, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The goals of the present targeted review on maternal and child overweight and obesity were to: (i) understand the current situation in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) with regard to recent trends and context-specific risk factors; and (ii) building off this, identify entry points for leveraging existing undernutrition programmes to address overweight and obesity in LMIC. Trends reveal that overweight and obesity are a growing problem among women and children in LMIC; as in Ghana, Kenya, Niger, Sierra Leone, Tanzania and Zimbabwe, where the prevalence among urban women is approaching 50 %. Four promising entry points were identified: (i) the integration of overweight and obesity into national nutrition plans; (ii) food systems (integration of food and beverage marketing regulations into existing polices on the marketing of breast-milk substitutes and adoption of policies to promote healthy diets); (iii) education systems (integration of nutrition into school curricula with provision of high-quality foods through school feeding programmes); and (iv) health systems (counselling and social and behaviour change communication to improve maternal diet, appropriate gestational weight gain, and optimal infant and young child feeding practices). We conclude by presenting a step-by-step guide for programme officers and policy makers in LMIC with actionable objectives to address overweight and obesity.

Type
Review Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017

The increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity among women and children in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) represents hindered progress on maternal and child health, and has important implications for future economic development( Reference Black, Victora and Walker 1 ). Between 2006 and 2015, the cost of lost economic productivity due to obesity-related CVD and diabetes in LMIC was estimated to be $US 84 billion( Reference Abegunde, Mathers and Adam 2 ). Moreover, obesity-related disability-adjusted life years in LMIC have increased dramatically over the past two decades: from 518 per 100 000 people in 1990 to 985 per 100 000 people in 2013, which translates into a 90 % relative increase in disability-adjusted life years( Reference Dobbs, Sawers and Thompson 3 ). Given that one of the targets for the Sustainable Development Goal 2, ‘End Hunger’, is to end all forms of malnutrition, strategies to address both undernutrition and overweight and obesity globally are urgently needed.

The purpose of the present targeted review on maternal and child overweight and obesity was not to systematically review trends in the prevalence of maternal and child overweight and obesity in LMIC. Instead, we aimed to conduct a targeted review in order to: (i) understand the current situation in LMIC with regard to recent trends and context-specific risk factors; and (ii) building off this, identify entry points for leveraging existing undernutrition programmes to address overweight and obesity in LMIC. We focused on low-income and lower-middle-income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where large development agencies currently support nutrition programmes. The overall goal is to spark evidence-based action in this important and almost entirely neglected topic in global nutrition.

Trends in overweight and obesity among women and children

According to the 2016 Global Nutrition Report, ‘obesity and overweight are now a staggering global burden’( 4 ). A recent analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys found that in urban Mauritania, over half of reproductive-aged women are overweight or obese, and the prevalence in urban areas of Ghana, Kenya, Niger, Sierra Leone, Tanzania and Zimbabwe is approaching 50 %( Reference Jaacks, Slining and Popkin 5 ). The annualized change in prevalence from approximately 2000 to 2010 among women in urban areas of Bangladesh, Ghana, Malawi, Nepal, Niger, Rwanda, Zambia and Zimbabwe was at least 1·00 %( Reference Jaacks, Slining and Popkin 5 ), meaning that if trends continue, the prevalence of overweight in urban areas of these countries will increase by 10 % over the next decade. The prevalence of overweight and obesity is lower in rural areas compared with urban areas in most LMIC( Reference Jaacks, Slining and Popkin 5 ). However, looking at trends over time, the recent rate of increase in overweight and obesity in several countries (e.g. Burkina Faso, Kenya, Uganda and Zimbabwe) is greater in rural areas compared with urban areas( Reference Jaacks, Slining and Popkin 5 ). Thus, while rural–urban disparities persist, the gap is narrowing in some countries.

While the most recent prevalence of overweight and obesity among adolescent girls was much lower than that among women, trend data indicate that the prevalence in adolescent girls is increasing over time in many countries( Reference Jaacks, Slining and Popkin 6 ). With respect to children under 5 years of age, Malawi, Mozambique, Nigeria, Rwanda and Zambia have a prevalence of overweight greater than 7 %( Reference Tzioumis, Kay and Bentley 7 ), which is the global nutrition target for childhood overweight set by the WHO( 8 ).

Context-specific risk factors for overweight and obesity

Risk factors were identified via reviewing the seminal Lancet series on obesity (2011 and 2015) and the Bellagio Conference on Program and Policy Options for Preventing Obesity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries( Reference Popkin, Monteiro and Swinburn 9 Reference Roberto, Swinburn and Hawkes 11 ). Shifts in dietary intake and physical activity resulting from economic development, urbanization and globalization of the food system are thought to be key drivers of the global obesity epidemic, and are described in detail elsewhere( Reference Popkin, Monteiro and Swinburn 9 , Reference Swinburn, Sacks and Hall 10 , Reference Gupta, Goel and Shah 12 ). Several risk factors may be of particular importance in the context of vulnerable populations living in LMIC and are discussed in detail here. These include: (i) maternal nutrition and appropriate gestational weight gain; (ii) infant and young child nutrition and healthy growth trajectories; (iii) value and social standing; (iv) time and effort for food preparation; and (v) cultural beliefs about body size.

Maternal nutrition and appropriate gestational weight gain

Few studies have explored gestational weight gain knowledge and beliefs in LMIC. One study, conducted in Nigeria, found that 40·1 and 35·4 % of mothers were classified as overweight and obese, respectively, according to pre-pregnancy BMI( Reference Olagbuji, Olofinbiyi and Akintayo 13 ). However, none of the obese mothers perceived themselves as obese( Reference Olagbuji, Olofinbiyi and Akintayo 13 ). In contrast, 32·0 % of the overweight mothers perceived themselves as overweight, and those who perceived themselves as overweight were more likely to gain the recommended amount of weight during pregnancy( Reference Olagbuji, Olofinbiyi and Akintayo 13 ). A qualitative study in Egypt found that women were not aware of and had no concept of appropriate gestational weight gain due to a lack of counselling by health-care providers( Reference Kavle, Mehanna and Khan 14 ). Given that maternal obesity and excess gestational weight gain have been associated with increased adiposity in offspring, largely in studies conducted in developed countries( Reference Poston 15 ), this is an important research gap in LMIC. In addition, insufficient maternal intakes of energy and micronutrients have been associated with increased adiposity in offspring, particularly female offspring – as reviewed by Yang and Huffman( Reference Yang and Huffman 16 ) and Christian and Stewart( Reference Christian and Stewart 17 ). For example, maternal energy intake of less than 3766 kJ/d (900 kcal/d) during the Dutch famine of 1944–1945 was associated with greater fat deposition in female offspring (average age at follow-up approximately 60 years), but not males( Reference Stein, Kahn and Rundle 18 ). Two secondary analyses of trials, one in Nepal( Reference Stewart, Christian and LeClerq 19 ) and one in Peru( Reference Iannotti, Zavaleta and Leon 20 ), found increased linear growth (Nepal) and lean body mass (Peru), and, in the case of Nepal, decreased adiposity, among offspring of women who received Zn+Fe+folic acid during pregnancy v. offspring of women who received Fe+folic acid.

Infant and young child nutrition and healthy growth trajectories

Fetal growth and growth in the first 2 years of life are important predictors of adult weight status( Reference Darnton-Hill, Nishida and James 21 ). A recent analysis of the Consortium on Health Oriented Research in Transitional Societies (COHORTS) study, which includes five LMIC (Brazil, Guatemala, India, the Philippines and South Africa), found that birth weight was more strongly associated with adult lean body mass than with adult fat mass( Reference Kuzawa, Hallal and Adair 22 ). Similarly, a study in Pune, India, found that the small birth size of babies was largely due to reduced skeletal muscle rather than reduced body fat( Reference Yajnik, Lubree and Rege 23 ), and a study in New Delhi, India, found that birth weight was positively associated with adult lean body mass but not adult central adiposity( Reference Sachdev, Fall and Osmond 24 ). In contrast, with respect to postnatal growth, a meta-analysis of fifteen studies reported an 84 % increase in risk of obesity at 10 years of age per 0·67 sd gain of weight in infancy( Reference Ong and Loos 25 ). Data from the COHORTS study suggest that both faster relative weight gain and faster linear growth among children were associated with increased risk of adult overweight( Reference Adair, Fall and Osmond 26 ). However, it is important to note that the magnitude of these associations in the COHORTS study was small: a 1 sd change in weight gain up to 12 or 24 months predicted less than a 1% change in adult body composition( Reference Kuzawa, Hallal and Adair 22 ). Together, these results suggest two key points:

  1. 1. improved birth weight, as an indicator of fetal growth, may be protective against overweight via building adult lean body mass; and

  2. 2. the known benefits of growth in the first 2 years of life on health and function( Reference Victora, Adair and Fall 27 ) and the known adverse consequences of growth faltering in early life on adult stature( Reference Li, Stein and Barnhart 28 ) are likely to outweigh any negative effects on adult obesity resulting from rapid ‘catch-up’ growth during this period( Reference Adair, Fall and Osmond 26 ).

While several systematic reviews and meta-analyses, including a WHO-led review( Reference Horta 29 ), have found protective effects of breast-feeding on obesity in developed countries, including the USA, Canada, UK, Germany, Australia, New Zealand and former Czechoslovakia, there is a need for additional studies to provide stronger evidence because these studies did not account for publication bias and residual confounding by maternal socio-economic status and lifestyle habits( Reference Casazza, Fernandez and Allison 30 ). One randomized controlled trial on promotion of exclusive breast-feeding in Belarus did not find any effect on childhood obesity( Reference Kramer, Matush and Vanilovich 31 ). A significant evidence gap remains on whether any relationship between breast-feeding and overweight exists in LMIC. A study in Brazil did not find a significant association between breast-feeding duration and BMI( Reference Brion, Lawlor and Matijasevich 32 ), while a study in India found only a weak association between breast-feeding duration and BMI and no association with skinfold thickness( Reference Caleyachetty, Krishnaveni and Veena 33 ). Regardless of whether breast-feeding is or is not protective against overweight, the strong evidence supporting other benefits of breast-feeding( 34 ) warrants continued support of breast-feeding recommendations( 35 ).

With regard to complementary feeding, the limited data available from LMIC suggest that suboptimal complementary feeding practices are common and include energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods. For example, a survey of 700 mothers of 6- to 18-month-old infants in Ibadan, Nigeria, found that, on a daily basis, 65·0 % regularly gave biscuits to their infants, 16·1 % gave soft drinks and 9·6 % gave commercial fruit juice( Reference Bankole, Aderinokun and Odenloye 36 ). In addition, 57·0 % of mothers sweetened their infants’ pap (maize-based porridge) with sugar( Reference Bankole, Aderinokun and Odenloye 36 ). In a study of 4299 children living in two slums outside Nairobi, Kenya, 41 % had received sweetened/flavoured water in the first 6 months of life( Reference Kimani-Murage, Madise and Fotso 37 ). With regard to breast-milk substitutes, high-protein infant formulas in the first 2 years of life have been associated with increased adiposity in childhood relative to control formulas in several randomized controlled trials conducted in Europe( Reference Koletzko, von Kries and Closa 38 , Reference Singhal, Kennedy and Lanigan 39 ), but this relationship has not been explored in LMIC.

Value and social standing

Few studies have explored drivers of food choice in LMIC. One qualitative study, conducted in rural Kerala, India, found that the two most important drivers of food choice at the household level were affordability and taste preferences of the children and husband( Reference Daivadanam, Wahlström and Thankappan 40 ). For example, one woman said, ‘… we use lot of oil … difficult to reduce, he [husband] likes lot of fried things’( Reference Daivadanam, Wahlström and Thankappan 40 ). Processed foods were perceived as ‘higher value’ based on the media’s portrayal of these foods as necessary for healthy growth and development of children( Reference Daivadanam, Wahlström and Thankappan 40 ). This can often lead to higher-than-affordable expenditures on these foods: for example, one woman said, ‘… spend an average four-thousand rupees on food per month … have to spend an extra one to two thousand on biscuits and powder items [health drinks] for small children in the house’( Reference Daivadanam, Wahlström and Thankappan 40 ). Similarly, expensive foods such as restaurant foods were considered ‘better’ than foods that were cheaper and could be prepared at home( Reference Daivadanam, Wahlström and Thankappan 40 ). A study in Nigeria also reported that consumption of fast foods was associated with higher social standing( Reference Akpan and Ekpenyong 41 ). In contrast, in Egypt, processed junk foods for children were not perceived as expensive and were within economic reach of most families in both rural and urban areas( Reference Kavle, Mehanna and Saleh 42 ). Also in Egypt, junk food consumption was not just an issue among children; mothers and other family members also consumed these foods( Reference Kavle, Mehanna and Saleh 42 ).

Time and effort for food preparation

As women enter the workforce, their time to prepare food becomes limited. For example, in the aforementioned qualitative study conducted in rural Kerala, India, one mother stated: ‘I come back from work and I just try to make something fast for the children as they are hungry by then’( Reference Daivadanam, Wahlström and Thankappan 40 ). In contrast, in lower-income households in these communities in rural Kerala, the limitation was affordability, not time: ‘Most people complain that it takes a lot of time and effort to cut vegetables. That is only for those who don’t have time. Here, we have time, but no vegetables and no money to buy it’( Reference Daivadanam, Wahlström and Thankappan 40 ). In Egypt, reducing consumption of junk food is challenging because mothers often give these foods out of convenience, stating that, ‘I have no time to cook for my children’, ‘I have no free time’ and ‘I felt lazy’( Reference Kavle, Mehanna and Saleh 42 ). Moreover, data from Egypt suggest that older siblings care for younger children and play an important role in feeding young children when mothers are away from home( Reference Kavle, Mehanna and Saleh 42 ). A recent analysis of data from Cambodia found that women increasingly have sales and service jobs, especially in urban settings, and that this is linked to overweight and obesity, potentially through time pressures in addition to increased sedentary time( Reference Espeut, Coffey and Nyaku 43 ). Further research is needed that focuses on the impact of women entering the workforce on weight status in LMIC and on potential mechanistic pathways other than sedentary time, such as stress, time pressures and economic independence.

Cultural beliefs about body size

Studies in some LMIC indicate that cultural beliefs about body size may be an important barrier to programmes aimed at preventing overweight and obesity. For example, in urban areas of Pakistan, where 64 % of adult study participants were overweight, most did not perceive themselves as overweight( Reference Bhanji, Khuwaja and Siddiqui 44 , Reference Saleem, Ahmed and Mulla 45 ). Two cross-sectional studies of overweight female university students residing in urban Pakistan reported that up to 18 % believed they were of normal weight( Reference Saleem, Ahmed and Mulla 45 , Reference Sirang, Bashir and Jalil 46 ). Findings also reveal that a Pakistani adult who is happy or does not think about his/her weight is six times more likely to misperceive him/herself as not being overweight( Reference Bhanji, Khuwaja and Siddiqui 44 ). In some sub-Saharan African countries, such as Nigeria, obesity is perceived as a sign of ‘power, respect, and an evidence of good living’( Reference Akpan and Ekpenyong 41 ). Further research is needed to understand beliefs relating to overweight and obesity, particularly in areas with a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS, as there may be a stigma attached to thinness in these contexts( Reference Kruger, Puoane and Senekal 47 ).

Entry points for overweight and obesity programming within existing undernutrition programmes

Based on our analysis of context-specific risk factors, we developed a conceptual framework (Fig. 1) that highlights programmes and policies that could be prioritized to address overweight and obesity in LMIC. The WHO’s Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020 ( 48 ), the WHO report Population-Based Approaches to Childhood Obesity Prevention ( 48 , 49 ) and the WHO report Interventions on Diet and Physical Activity: What Works ( 50 ) were also consulted when developing the conceptual framework. The overlap between aspects of this framework and existing nutrition programmes largely focused on undernutrition is presented in Table 1. The four promising entry points identified were as follows:

  1. 1. integration of overweight and obesity into national nutrition plans;

  2. 2. food systems (integration of food and beverage marketing regulations into existing polices on the marketing of breast-milk substitutes and adoption of policies to promote healthy diets);

  3. 3. education systems (integration of nutrition into school curricula with provision of high-quality foods through school feeding programmes); and

  4. 4. health systems (counselling and social and behaviour change communication to improve maternal diet, appropriate gestational weight gain, and optimal infant and young child feeding practices).

Fig. 1 Framework illustrating how specific actions can help to achieve meaningful improvements in outcomes such as increased uptake of optimal nutrition and health practices, and how they impact overweight and obesity and other forms of malnutrition

Table 1 Examples of programmatic approaches to address overweight and obesity in low- and middle-income countries in the context of existing nutrition programmes largely focused on undernutrition

Integration of overweight and obesity into national nutrition plans

Strong nutrition governance, including setting SMART (specific, measureable, achievable, relevant and time-bound) targets, has been linked to achieving undernutrition goals such as stunting( 4 , Reference Sunguya, Ong and Dhakal 51 ). Few LMIC address overweight and obesity in their national nutrition plans. Kenya is an example of one such country. The Kenyan National Nutrition Action Plan (2012–2017) outlines specific activities to address the increase in overweight and obesity in Kenya, including the following: review, develop and disseminate a comprehensive strategy and guidelines for preventing, managing and controlling nutrition-related non-communicable diseases; train service providers and create public awareness on the importance of preventing, managing and controlling nutrition-related non-communicable diseases; scale up community screening of BMI and waist circumference; and improve nutrition in schools. Kenya’s 2013 National Maternal, Infant, and Young Child Nutrition Policy Guidelines also state that childhood obesity is an emerging public health problem.

Food systems

The food system is a critical underlying determinant of dietary intake, and includes food production, distribution, processing, packaging, marketing and retail. Two aspects of food systems that are particularly important for addressing overweight and obesity in LMIC include: (i) implementing the WHO recommendations on marketing of food and beverages to children; and (ii) policies that promote healthy diets and discourage unhealthy diets.

According to the WHO, introducing policies that reduce the marketing of foods high in saturated fat, trans-fat, free sugars or salt to children is likely to be one of the most cost-effective interventions available to governments to address obesity( 49 , 52 ). Three upper-middle-income countries (Brazil, Thailand and South Africa) have drafted resolutions that address food marketing to children( Reference Hawkes and Lobstein 53 ), but these policies are currently suspended in both Brazil( Reference Silva, Bortolini and Jaime 54 ) and South Africa( Reference Igumbor, Sanders and Puoane 55 ). Many LMIC have already adopted policies that regulate food industry marketing of breast-milk substitutes( 56 ) and lessons learned from that process may prove to be informative for adopting resolutions to regulate marketing of unhealthy foods to children( Reference Lutter 57 ). Lessons learned from high-income countries that have already adopted marketing restrictions could also be useful to policy makers in LMIC. For example, in the UK, where marketing restrictions have been in place since 2007, an analysis of advertising exposure to high-fat, -salt or -sugar products among children under 16 years of age found almost universal adherence to the restrictions, but that exposure did not change before and after the adoption of the restrictions( Reference Adams, Tyrrell and Adamson 58 ), suggesting that stronger restrictions targeting a wider range of advertisements is needed.

The NOURISHING framework developed by World Cancer Research Fund International is a tool that policy makers in LMIC can use for guidance on developing a comprehensive policy package to promote healthy diets and discourage unhealthy diets( Reference Hawkes, Jewell and Allen 59 ). Few LMIC have adopted policies consistent with the NOURISHING framework. This was made evident at the 2013 Bellagio Conference on Program and Policy Options for Preventing Obesity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries( Reference Popkin, Monteiro and Swinburn 9 ): of the thirteen countries represented at the Conference, only two were lower-middle-income countries (India and Bangladesh) and none were low-income countries. Nevertheless, some LMIC policies addressing the food system within the NOURISHING framework are worth mentioning here.

Several LMIC have policies that promote fruit and vegetable production; many were originally adopted in order to address micronutrient deficiencies, but now play the additional role of overweight and obesity prevention( Reference Lachat, Otchere and Roberfroid 60 ). Several LMIC have also adopted food-based dietary guidelines. For example, the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population, which, in conjunction with the National Food and Nutrition Security Policy and National Health Promotion Policy, aim to promote healthy eating and the prevention of malnutrition including micronutrient deficiencies and overweight and obesity( 61 ). These Guidelines could be adapted to other countries as part of a comprehensive policy package to address malnutrition, including overweight and obesity.

In 2005, the Ghana Ministry of Health adopted the Regenerative Health and Nutrition Program with the primary objective of promoting healthy lifestyles, including diet and daily physical activity. Since 2006, over 50 000 community members have been trained, who in turn educate other community members. However, analysis of data from before and after implementing the programme shows an overall decline in unhealthy behaviours only among highly educated individuals( 62 , Reference Tagoe and Dake 63 ). Moreover, a panel in the 2016 Global Nutrition Report suggests that the 2012 National Policy for the Prevention and Control of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases in Ghana has not been ‘operationalized in any way’( 4 ).

Finally, nutrition labelling has been recommended as a policy tool for addressing unhealthy food environments( 49 ). However, the impact of interpretive nutrition labelling policies on food purchasing patterns has been evaluated only in the UK, where there was ‘no discernible effect on the relative healthiness of consumer purchases’( Reference Sacks, Rayner and Swinburn 64 ).

Education systems

A systematic review including twenty-two studies from LMIC found that school-based interventions have the potential to improve diet and physical activity behaviours and decrease BMI in these contexts( Reference Verstraeten, Roberfroid and Lachat 65 ). Schools offer a unique opportunity to change norms around nutritional practices and healthy body weights. The review also found that involving multiple stakeholders and integrating educational activities into existing school curricula worked best( Reference Verstraeten, Roberfroid and Lachat 65 ).

Two cities in Africa – Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso and Cotonou, Benin – have piloted the WHO Nutrition-Friendly School Initiative, which is a framework for the prevention of the double burden of undernutrition and overweight among schoolchildren. There are five conditions that must be met for a school to be considered nutrition-friendly, beginning with the formation of a School Nutrition Committee that involves key stakeholders. The School Nutrition Committee is responsible for meeting these five conditions and for monitoring and evaluation of the programme: (i) a written school policy on nutrition; (ii) building awareness and capacity of the surrounding community as they relate to nutrition; (iii) school curriculum adaptation to include nutrition; (iv) school environment that supports optimal nutrition and health; and (v) school nutrition and health services( 66 ). In Ouagadougou, sensitizing communities to nutrition was identified as a priority for half of the schools( Reference Delisle, Receveur and Agueh 67 ), and many involved in the initiative felt that these policies should be implemented at the national level rather than the school level( Reference Delisle, Receveur and Agueh 67 ). Piloting the Nutrition-Friendly School Initiative in 2007 in New Delhi, India, an initial assessment found no written nutrition policies in the four participating schools and no integration of nutrition and health into the school curriculum( Reference Parmar 68 ).

A 6-month nutrition education programme focused on nutrition, physical activity, non-communicable diseases and healthy cooking practices was implemented in both private and public schools of three northern Indian cities (New Delhi, Agra and Jaipur)( Reference Shah, Misra and Gupta 69 ). At baseline, only 25–55 % of students considered deep-fried Indian snack foods to be junk foods and 25–35 % of students thought that consuming butter improves bone strength and health( Reference Shah, Misra and Gupta 69 ). Results of the intervention were promising: a pre/post statistical comparison of responses of a random subset of students to a questionnaire on health and nutrition-related knowledge found significant improvements in both private and public schools, particularly on questions relating to physical activity and healthy cooking practices( Reference Shah, Misra and Gupta 69 ).

Government policies to support the provision of healthy foods in schools could build off the Purchase from Africans for Africa programme (Ethiopia, Malawi, Mozambique, Niger and Senegal), which encourages the consumption of non-processed, nutrient-dense foods (cereals, pulses and legumes, fruits, vegetables and animal products)( 70 ). For example, as part of the programme, Malawi smallholder farmers now provide staple grains, groundnuts, bananas and fish to ten primary schools where enrolment has increased by 15 %( 71 ). Prevention of overweight and obesity could be an important co-benefit of such programmes.

Health systems

Currently, programming during routine contact points with women and children at the community and facility levels in LMIC focuses on reducing undernutrition without consideration of overweight and obesity. However, these are unique opportunities to address maternal diet and weight gain during pregnancy, as well as infant and young child feeding practices that are important risk factors for overweight and obesity.

Few studies in LMIC have evaluated the impact of antenatal counselling on appropriate gestational weight gain. In Nigeria, receiving information on gestational weight gain from multiple health-care providers was significantly associated with increased levels of maternal knowledge on risks of inappropriate weight gain( Reference Olagbuji, Olofinbiyi and Akintayo 13 ). However, although 57 % of Nigerian mothers were counselled on the risks associated with excess weight gain, many mothers were not aware of the recommended amount of weight gain during pregnancy( Reference Olagbuji, Olofinbiyi and Akintayo 13 ). In Egypt, women were also not counselled on weight gain during pregnancy and had little understanding of the appropriate amount of weight gain( Reference Kavle, Mehanna and Khan 14 ). A small study of women attending a clinic in Accra, Ghana, found that they were willing to reduce their body size in order to reduce the risk of obesity-related illnesses such as hypertension, diabetes, CVD and myocardial infarction( Reference Duda, Jumah and Hill 72 ). Education, income, marital status and number of children did not influence their response, although women who were younger than 50 years of age tended to be more likely to report being willing to reduce their body size to improve health( Reference Duda, Jumah and Hill 72 ). Thus, providing counselling on maternal diet and weight gain during pregnancy during antenatal care can potentially address overweight and obesity in LMIC.

Another important point of entry is existing health promotion-based interventions such as complementary feeding interventions for infants and young children. Health-care providers and families need to understand healthy v. unhealthy weight gain and can learn to monitor excessive and/or rapid weight gain within the context of undernutrition programming. In addition, families should be advised that junk foods are detrimental to the growth of children and the entire family’s health, and providers should be trained to provide nutrition counselling for families during routine growth monitoring visits( 73 ). A recent study in Egypt used Trials for Improved Practices (TIPs) methodology to address poor infant and young child feeding practices over the course of three home visits (Fig. 2)( Reference Kavle, Mehanna and Saleh 42 ). During the first visit, researchers discussed behaviours, practices and motivations for infant and young child feeding with mothers, focusing on junk foods. During the second visit, mothers jointly decided with the research team what specific feeding practices they would be willing to try over a one-week period. During the third and final visit, mothers discussed their experiences with TIPs: which recommended practices worked, which did not work and any modifications that were made. Results supported the importance of reducing junk food consumption keeping cultural influences and beliefs in mind when designing interventions.

Fig. 2 Example of how Trials for Improved Practices (TIPs) addressed junk food as an infant feeding problem in Egypt

Research gaps

Important research gaps identified in the present review include:

  • Underlying drivers that are shared by all forms of malnutrition.

  • Evaluation of the appropriateness of the Institute of Medicine guidelines for weight gain during pregnancy( Reference Yaktine and Rasmussen 74 ) in the context of LMIC.

  • Studies on the association between maternal overweight and obesity, gestational weight gain and child health outcomes.

  • Studies of the long-term impact of dietary intake during infancy and early childhood on adult overweight and obesity.

  • Drivers of food choice, especially among overweight mothers, and how this information can be used to design programmes to engage women and their families.

  • The impact of women entering the workforce on weight status in LMIC and potential mechanistic pathways other than sedentary time such as stress, time pressures and economic independence.

  • In settings where undernutrition is still prevalent, testing the effectiveness of interventions that integrate infant/child overweight prevention into antenatal/postnatal care.

  • Studies of the potential adverse effects of supplemental feeding programmes on overweight. One analysis of infant feeding programmes in Chile found increases in child weight-for-age and weight-for-length with little impact on length-for-age( Reference Uauy and Kain 75 ). A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial in Burkina Faso found that women with pre-pregnancy BMI in the highest tertile (21·8–28·1 kg/m2) who received lipid-based nutrient supplements gave birth to infants with higher leptin concentrations compared with women with pre-pregnancy BMI in the lowest tertile (15·8–19·7 kg/m2), which may be a marker of higher neonatal fat mass( Reference Huybregts, Roberfroid and Lanou 76 ). Thus, supplemental feeding programmes should be targeted to high-risk beneficiaries for energy supplementation (e.g. in humanitarian emergencies and to severely undernourished individuals).

Next steps and conclusion

Outside extreme conditions, such as war and famine, no country has witnessed a decline in the prevalence of adult obesity( Reference Roberto, Swinburn and Hawkes 11 ). Current expert opinion holds that a package of initiatives including multisectoral policies and behaviour change interventions is needed( Reference Roberto, Swinburn and Hawkes 11 ). However, the current review has identified many substantial research gaps; this topic remains a severely neglected area of global nutrition. Thus, a key limitation of the review was the fact that there was not enough scientific evidence to support a systematic review and meta-analysis of specific programmes and policies to address overweight and obesity in LMIC. In addition, to date, programmes have struggled with operationalizing overweight and obesity within the context of undernutrition, and programmatic and routine data from health systems are largely non-existent. The goal of the present targeted review is to guide research and the design and implementation of nutrition programming in the coming years to inform such a systematic review.

The first step to addressing overweight and obesity in LMIC is integration into national nutrition plans and setting SMART targets. Nevertheless, even with these commitments, implementation of overweight and obesity prevention programmes and policies will be a challenge. To aid in this process, we have developed a four-step implementation guide for programme officers and policy makers in LMIC (Fig. 3): (i) assess the problem; (ii) raise awareness and build a multisectoral coalition; (iii) understand how to address the problem; and (iv) develop social and behaviour change communication messages and an implementation plan.

Fig. 3 Step-by-step implementation guide to address overweight and obesity in low- and middle-income countries (DHS, Demographic and Health Survey)

The 2016 Global Nutrition Report concluded that in low-income countries, the traditional issues of wasting, stunting and micronutrient deficiencies persist in the face of rising overweight and obesity( 4 ). Integration of efforts to address overweight and obesity within existing programmes focused on undernutrition is needed to maintain gains in maternal and child health in LMIC( Reference Black, Victora and Walker 1 ). The food system, education system and health system could all be leveraged in the development of comprehensive programmes and policies to address all forms of malnutrition.

Acknowledgements

Financial support: This work was supported by UK aid from the UK Government’s Department for International Development. The opinions herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department for International Development. Conflict of interest: L.M.J. has served as a consultant to PATH. The other authors report no conflict of interest. Authorship: All authors contributed to formulating the research question. L.M.J. drafted the article with J.K. A.P. and A.N. provided critical feedback on the draft. All authors approved the final version. Ethics of human subject participation: Not applicable.

References

1. Black, RE, Victora, CG, Walker, SP et al. (2013) Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 382, 427451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Abegunde, DO, Mathers, CD, Adam, T et al. (2007) The burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 370, 19291938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Dobbs, R, Sawers, C, Thompson, F et al. (2014) Overcoming Obesity: An Initial Economic Analysis. London: McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
4. International Food Policy Research Institute (2016) Global Nutrition Report 2016. From Promise to Impact: Ending Malnutrition by 2030. Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
5. Jaacks, LM, Slining, MM & Popkin, BM (2015) Recent underweight and overweight trends by rural–urban residence among women in low- and middle-income countries. J Nutr 145, 352357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Jaacks, LM, Slining, MM & Popkin, BM (2015) Recent trends in the prevalence of under- and overweight among adolescent girls in low- and middle-income countries. Pediatr Obes 10, 428435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Tzioumis, E, Kay, MC, Bentley, ME et al. (2016) Prevalence and trends in the childhood dual burden of malnutrition in low- and middle-income countries, 1990–2012. Public Health Nutr 19, 13751388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. World Health Organization (2014) Global Nutrition Targets 2025: Childhood Overweight Policy Brief. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
9. Popkin, B, Monteiro, C & Swinburn, B (2013) Overview: Bellagio Conference on Program and Policy Options for Preventing Obesity in the Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Obes Rev 14, Suppl. 2, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Swinburn, BA, Sacks, G, Hall, KD et al. (2011) The global obesity pandemic: shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet 378, 804814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Roberto, CA, Swinburn, B, Hawkes, C et al. (2015) Patchy progress on obesity prevention: emerging examples, entrenched barriers, and new thinking. Lancet 385, 24002409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Gupta, N, Goel, K, Shah, P et al. (2012) Childhood obesity in developing countries: epidemiology, determinants, and prevention. Endocr Rev 33, 4870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Olagbuji, BN, Olofinbiyi, BA, Akintayo, AA et al. (2015) Maternal perspectives on gestational weight gain: critical information on developing weight control interventions. Niger Med J 56, 96102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Kavle, J, Mehanna, S, Khan, G et al. (2014) Cultural Beliefs and Perceptions of Maternal Diet and Weight Gain During Pregnancy and Postpartum Family Planning in Egypt. Washington, DC: US Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
15. Poston, L (2012) Maternal obesity, gestational weight gain and diet as determinants of offspring long term health. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 26, 627639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Yang, Z & Huffman, SL (2013) Nutrition in pregnancy and early childhood and associations with obesity in developing countries. Matern Child Nutr 9, 105119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Christian, P & Stewart, CP (2010) Maternal micronutrient deficiency, fetal development, and the risk of chronic disease. J Nutr 140, 437445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Stein, AD, Kahn, HS, Rundle, A et al. (2007) Anthropometric measures in middle age after exposure to famine during gestation: evidence from the Dutch famine. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 869876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Stewart, CP, Christian, P, LeClerq, SC et al. (2009) Antenatal supplementation with folic acid+iron+zinc improves linear growth and reduces peripheral adiposity in school-age children in rural Nepal. Am J Clin Nutr 90, 132140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Iannotti, LL, Zavaleta, N, Leon, Z et al. (2008) Maternal zinc supplementation and growth in Peruvian infants. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 154160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Darnton-Hill, I, Nishida, C & James, W (2004) A life course approach to diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Public Health Nutr 7, 101121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Kuzawa, CW, Hallal, PC, Adair, L et al. (2012) Birth weight, postnatal weight gain, and adult body composition in five low and middle income countries. Am J Hum Biol 24, 513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Yajnik, C, Lubree, H, Rege, S et al. (2002) Adiposity and hyperinsulinemia in Indians are present at birth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87, 55755580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Sachdev, HS, Fall, CH, Osmond, C et al. (2005) Anthropometric indicators of body composition in young adults: relation to size at birth and serial measurements of body mass index in childhood in the New Delhi birth cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 82, 456466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Ong, KK & Loos, RJ (2006) Rapid infancy weight gain and subsequent obesity: systematic reviews and hopeful suggestions. Acta Paediatr 95, 904908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Adair, LS, Fall, CH, Osmond, C et al. (2013) Associations of linear growth and relative weight gain during early life with adult health and human capital in countries of low and middle income: findings from five birth cohort studies. Lancet 382, 525534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Victora, CG, Adair, L, Fall, C et al. (2008) Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet 371, 340357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Li, H, Stein, AD, Barnhart, HX et al. (2003) Associations between prenatal and postnatal growth and adult body size and composition. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 14981505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Horta, BL, World Health Organization (2007) Evidence on the Long-Term Effects of Breastfeeding. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
30. Casazza, K, Fernandez, JR & Allison, DB (2012) Modest protective effects of breast-feeding on obesity: is the evidence truly supportive? Nutr Today 47, 3338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Kramer, MS, Matush, L, Vanilovich, I et al. (2007) Effects of prolonged and exclusive breastfeeding on child height, weight, adiposity, and blood pressure at age 6.5 y: evidence from a large randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 17171721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Brion, M-JA, Lawlor, DA, Matijasevich, A et al. (2011) What are the causal effects of breastfeeding on IQ, obesity and blood pressure? Evidence from comparing high-income with middle-income cohorts. Int J Epidemiol 40, 670680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33. Caleyachetty, A, Krishnaveni, GV, Veena, SR et al. (2013) Breastfeeding duration, age of starting solids and high BMI risk and adiposity in Indian children. Matern Child Nutr 9, 199216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. World Health Organization (2013) Short-Term Effects of Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review on the Benefits of Breastfeeding on Diarrhoea and Pneumonia Mortality. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
35. World Health Organization & UNICEF (2003) Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
36. Bankole, O, Aderinokun, G, Odenloye, O et al. (2006) Weaning practices among some Nigerian women: implication on oral health. Odontostomatol Trop 29, 1521.Google ScholarPubMed
37. Kimani-Murage, EW, Madise, NJ, Fotso, J-C et al. (2011) Patterns and determinants of breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices in urban informal settlements, Nairobi Kenya. BMC Public Health 11, 396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38. Koletzko, B, von Kries, R, Closa, R et al. (2009) Lower protein in infant formula is associated with lower weight up to age 2 y: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 18361845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Singhal, A, Kennedy, K, Lanigan, J et al. (2010) Nutrition in infancy and long-term risk of obesity: evidence from 2 randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 11331144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Daivadanam, M, Wahlström, R, Thankappan, K et al. (2015) Balancing expectations amidst limitations: the dynamics of food decision-making in rural Kerala. BMC Public Health 15, 644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Akpan, E & Ekpenyong, C (2013) Urbanization drift and obesity epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of the situation in Nigeria. Eur J Sustain Dev 2, 141164.Google Scholar
42. Kavle, JA, Mehanna, S, Saleh, G et al. (2015) Exploring why junk foods are ‘essential’ foods and how culturally tailored recommendations improved feeding in Egyptian children. Matern Child Nutr 11, 346370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Espeut, D TE, Coffey, C, Nyaku, A et al. (2016) A Multi-Stage Analysis on Key Determinants of Malnutrition in Cambodia. Washington, DC: Maximizing the Quality of Scaling Up Nutrition Project (MQSUN), PATH.Google Scholar
44. Bhanji, S, Khuwaja, AK, Siddiqui, F et al. (2011) Underestimation of weight and its associated factors among overweight and obese adults in Pakistan: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 11, 363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45. Saleem, MD, Ahmed, G, Mulla, J et al. (2013) Weight misperception amongst youth of a developing country: Pakistan-a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 13, 707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. Sirang, Z, Bashir, HH, Jalil, B et al. (2013) Weight patterns and perceptions among female university students of Karachi: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 13, 230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47. Kruger, HS, Puoane, T, Senekal, M et al. (2005) Obesity in South Africa: challenges for government and health professionals. Public Health Nutr 8, 491500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48. World Health Organization (2013) Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
49. World Health Organization (2012) Population-Based Approaches to Childhood Obesity Prevention. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
50. World Health Organization (2009) Interventions on Diet and Physical Activity: What Works: Summary Report. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
51. Sunguya, BF, Ong, KI, Dhakal, S et al. (2014) Strong nutrition governance is a key to addressing nutrition transition in low and middle-income countries: review of countries’ nutrition policies. Nutr J 13, 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52. World Health Organization (2006) Marketing of Food and Non-Alcoholic Beverages to Children. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
53. Hawkes, C & Lobstein, T (2011) Regulating the commercial promotion of food to children: a survey of actions worldwide. Int J Pediatr Obes 6, 8394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
54. Silva, AC, Bortolini, GA & Jaime, PC (2013) Brazil’s national programs targeting childhood obesity prevention. Int J Obes Suppl 3, Suppl. 1, S9S11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55. Igumbor, EU, Sanders, D, Puoane, TR et al. (2012) ‘Big food’, the consumer food environment, health, and the policy response in South Africa. PLoS Med 9, e1001253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
56. World Health Organization & UNICEF (2016) Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes: National Implementation of the International Code. Status Report 2016. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
57. Lutter, CK (2013) The International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes: lessons learned and implications for the regulation of marketing of foods and beverages to children. Public Health Nutr 16, 18791884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
58. Adams, J, Tyrrell, R, Adamson, AJ et al. (2012) Effect of restrictions on television food advertising to children on exposure to advertisements for ‘less healthy’ foods: repeat cross-sectional study. PLoS One 7, e31578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
59. Hawkes, C, Jewell, J & Allen, K (2013) A food policy package for healthy diets and the prevention of obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases: the NOURISHING framework. Obes Rev 14, 159168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60. Lachat, C, Otchere, S, Roberfroid, D et al. (2013) Diet and physical activity for the prevention of noncommunicable diseases in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic policy review. PLoS Med 10, e1001465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
61. Ministry of Health of Brazil (2014) Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population. Brasilia: Ministry of Health of Brazil.Google Scholar
62. Rwanda Ministry of Health (2008–2009) Regenerative Health & Nutrition (RHNP): About. http://rhnp.gov.gh/about.php?id=0004& (accessed August 2015).Google Scholar
63. Tagoe, HA & Dake, FA (2011) Healthy lifestyle behaviour among Ghanaian adults in the phase of a health policy change. Global Health 7, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
64. Sacks, G, Rayner, M & Swinburn, B (2009) Impact of front-of-pack ‘traffic-light’ nutrition labelling on consumer food purchases in the UK. Health Promot Int 24, 344352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
65. Verstraeten, R, Roberfroid, D, Lachat, C et al. (2012) Effectiveness of preventive school-based obesity interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 96, 415438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
66. World Health Organization/UNICEF/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2006) Nutrition-Friendly School Initiative. Part I: Conceptual Framework. Part II: Self-Appraisal Tool. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
67. Delisle, HF, Receveur, O, Agueh, V et al. (2013) Pilot project of the Nutrition-Friendly School Initiative (NFSI) in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso and Cotonou, Benin, in West Africa. Glob Health Promot 20, 3949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68. Parmar, A (2009) Nutrition-Friendly School Initiative – The Indian experience. New Delhi: HRIDAY-SHAN.Google Scholar
69. Shah, P, Misra, A, Gupta, N et al. (2010) Improvement in nutrition-related knowledge and behaviour of urban Asian Indian school children: findings from the ‘Medical education for children/Adolescents for Realistic prevention of obesity and diabetes and for healthy aGeing’ (MARG) intervention study. Br J Nutr 104, 427436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
70. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2014) Scaling-Up Purchase from Africans for Africa: Family Farmers Supply Nutritious Meals for School Children. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
71. World Food Programme (2014) Improving links between smallholder farmers and school feeding programmes. https://www.wfp.org/purchase-progress/news/blog/p4p-improves-links-between-small-scale-farmers-and-school-feeding-progra (accessed September 2015).Google Scholar
72. Duda, RB, Jumah, NA, Hill, AG et al. (2006) Interest in healthy living outweighs presumed cultural norms for obesity for Ghanaian women. Health Qual Life Out 4, 44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
73. US Agency for International Development (2016) Maternal and Child Survival Program (MCSP) Nutrition Brief: Junk Food Consumption is a Nutrition Problem among Infants and Young Children: Evidence and Program Considerations for Low and Middle Income Countries. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar
74. Yaktine, AL & Rasmussen, KM (2009) Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
75. Uauy, R & Kain, J (2002) The epidemiological transition: need to incorporate obesity prevention into nutrition programmes. Public Health Nutr 5, 223229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76. Huybregts, L, Roberfroid, D, Lanou, H et al. (2013) Prenatal lipid-based nutrient supplements increase cord leptin concentration in pregnant women from rural Burkina Faso. J Nutr 143, 576583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Framework illustrating how specific actions can help to achieve meaningful improvements in outcomes such as increased uptake of optimal nutrition and health practices, and how they impact overweight and obesity and other forms of malnutrition

Figure 1

Table 1 Examples of programmatic approaches to address overweight and obesity in low- and middle-income countries in the context of existing nutrition programmes largely focused on undernutrition

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Example of how Trials for Improved Practices (TIPs) addressed junk food as an infant feeding problem in Egypt

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Step-by-step implementation guide to address overweight and obesity in low- and middle-income countries (DHS, Demographic and Health Survey)