Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:27:14.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigating the bioavailability of phytochemicals and minerals from broccoli soups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2015

T. Sivapalan ,
A. Melchini ,
M. Traka ,
S. Saha  and
R. Mithen
T. Sivapalan
Affiliation:
Food and Health Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK
A. Melchini
Affiliation:
Food and Health Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK
M. Traka
Affiliation:
Food and Health Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK
S. Saha
Affiliation:
Food and Health Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK
R. Mithen
Affiliation:
Food and Health Programme, Institute of Food Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UA, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 74 , Issue OCE3: Scottish Section Meeting, 25–26 March 2015, Diet, gene regulation and metabolic disease , 2015 , E191
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

Cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli are associated with a reduced risk of different types of cancers( Reference Higdon, Delage and Williams 1 ), cardiovascular diseases( Reference Zhang, Shu and Xiang 2 ) and other chronic diseases. This is attributed to the active phytochemical sulforaphane (SF) hydrolysed from glucoraphanin, a glucosinolate found in broccoli( Reference Gasper, Al-Janobi and Smith 3 ). SF is a potent inducer of Nrf2, a transcription factor which upregulates anti-oxidant genes and has lately been shown to modulate central metabolic pathways( Reference Hayes and Dinkova-Kostova 4 ). We have developed broccoli varieties with allelic variation in Myb28, a key transcription factor in glucosinolate biosynthesis, and are using these to deliver increasing levels of glucoraphanin in human dietary intervention studies. The aim of the current study is to assess bioavailability of SF and other minerals from soups containing these novel varieties.

The study was designed to recruit ten healthy participants (male and female) aged 18–65 years old into a randomized, double-blinded, three-phase crossover intervention trial. Plasma and urine samples are collected at various timepoints after consumption of one of the three types of soup (standard [Myb28−/−], Beneforte® [Myb28vill/−] and Beneforte Extra broccoli [Myb28vill/vill]). Total SF, free SF, and its conjugates (SF-glutathione, SF-cysteine-glycine, SF-cysteine and SF-N-acetyl cysteine) was measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method stated by Gasper et al( Reference Gasper, Al-Janobi and Smith 3 ) and cyclocondensation based on the method of Ye et al( Reference Ye, Dinkova-Kostova and Wade 5 ). Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was performed according to the method used by Hurst et al( Reference Hurst, Siyame and Young 6 ) to analyse total sulphur and other minerals in the broccoli soups, urine and plasma.

Glucoraphanin values are a mean of 10 independent soup batches. Total sulphur, iron, potassium values are a mean of 3 independent soup batches. ***p < 0·001 vs standard broccoli using ANOVA.

Mineral analysis of the three soups is outlined in the table which shows that Beneforte® and Beneforte extra soups have significantly higher concentrations of glucoraphanin, total sulphur, iron and potassium compared to standard broccoli. These results confirm that the Beneforte Extra and Beneforte® broccolis are able to deliver 10 times and 3 times more glucoraphanin respectively compared to standard broccoli (p < 0·001). Analysis of SF and metabolites in plasma and urine sample are undergoing. In conclusion, the results from this study provide valuable information on SF metabolism for other future studies.

This study is funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC).

References

1. Higdon, JV, Delage, B, Williams, DE et al. (2007) Pharmacol Res 55, 224–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Zhang, X, Shu, XO, Xiang, YB et al. (2011) Am J Clin Nutr 94, 240–246.Google Scholar
3. Gasper, AV, Al-Janobi, A, Smith, JA et al. (2005) Am J Clin Nutr 82, 1283–1291.Google Scholar
4. Hayes, JD and Dinkova-Kostova, AT. (2014) Trends Biochem Sci 39, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ye, L, Dinkova-Kostova, AT, Wade, KL et al. (2002) Clin Chim Acta 316, 43–53.Google Scholar
6. Hurst, R, Siyame, EW, Young, SD et al. (2013) Sci Rep 3, 1425.Google Scholar