INTRODUCTION
Protozoa of the genus Perkinsus are facultative intracellular parasites of marine molluscs, in particular bivalves (Choi and Park, Reference Choi, Park, Ishimatsu and Lie2010; Villalba et al. Reference Villalba, Gestal, Casas, Figueras, Figueras and Novoa2011). This genus is widely distributed worldwide and consists of seven species. Two of them, Perkinsus marinus and Perkinsus olseni, require mandatory reporting to the World Organization for Animal Health because they cause mass mortality in oysters and clams (OIE, 2015), leading to important economic losses. Therefore, there is increasing interest in conducting a variety of studies, among them those aimed at determining the environmental conditions that favour the proliferation of the parasite in the host and that can lead to death (Burreson and Ragone Calvo, Reference Burreson and Ragone Calvo1996; Oliver et al. Reference Oliver, Fisher, Ford, Calvo, Burreson, Sutton and Gandy1998; Cáceres-Martínez et al. Reference Cáceres-Martínez, Ortega, Vásquez-Yeomans, García, Stokes and Carnegie2012).
The development of Perkinsus spp. in vitro isolation and propagation techniques (Gauthier and Vasta, Reference Gauthier and Vasta1993; La Peyre et al. Reference La Peyre, Faisal and Burreson1993; Mclaughlin and Faisal, Reference Mclaughlin and Faisal1998; Casas et al. Reference Casas, La Peyre, Reece, Azevedo and Villalba2002, Reference Casas, Reece, Li, Moss, Villalba and La Peyre2008) enabled the performance of more specific studies addressing morphological, biochemical, physiological and genetic aspects of these protozoan parasites (Sunila et al. Reference Sunila, Hamilton and Dungan2001; Chu et al. Reference Chu, Lund, Soudant and Harvey2002; La Peyre et al. Reference La Peyre, Casas and La Peyre2006; Lund et al. Reference Lund, Chu, Soudant and Harvey2007; Ascenso et al. Reference Ascenso, Leite, Afonso and Cancela2009). Perkinsus spp. cells are generally present at the trophozoite phase when cultured in vitro. Throughout their development, under controlled conditions, trophozoites increase in size and subsequently undergo schizogony, which is characterized by successive internal cell divisions, with the formation of smaller cells that will generate new trophozoites (La Peyre et al. Reference La Peyre, Faisal and Burreson1993; Sunila et al. Reference Sunila, Hamilton and Dungan2001; Casas et al. Reference Casas, Reece, Li, Moss, Villalba and La Peyre2008). Some isolates present zoosporulation under these conditions; however, this event is often restricted to a small percentage of the cell population (Dungan et al. Reference Dungan, Reece, Moss, Hamilton and Diggles2007; da Silva et al. Reference da Silva, Tubino, Guertler, Ferreira, Santana, Fernández-boo, Ramilo, Cao and Villalba2013).
The data collected so far in field studies (Burreson and Ragone Calvo, Reference Burreson and Ragone Calvo1996; Oliver et al. Reference Oliver, Fisher, Ford, Calvo, Burreson, Sutton and Gandy1998; Gullian-Klanian et al. Reference Gullian-Klanian, Herrera-Silveira, Rodríguez-Canul and Aguirre-Macedo2008) and in in vitro assays (Burreson et al. Reference Burreson, Ragone Calvo, La Peyre, Counts and Paynter1994; La Peyre et al. Reference La Peyre, Casas and La Peyre2006, Reference La Peyre, Casas, Gayle and La Peyre2010) lead to a consensus that high temperatures and salinities favour P. marinus proliferation, survival and infectivity. The simultaneous occurrence of these conditions may further contribute to the negative effects of the infection and can lead to the host's death, as traditionally observed for its typical host, the American oyster Crassostrea virginica (Smolowitz, Reference Smolowitz2013).
From the physiological point of view, little is known about the influence of temperature and salinity on Perkinsus spp. cells. In addition to cell proliferation and viability, other in vitro cellular parameters evaluated under these environmental conditions include metabolic activity (La Peyre et al. Reference La Peyre, Casas and La Peyre2006), fatty acid synthesis (Lund et al. Reference Lund, Chu and Harvey2004), metabolism of lipids and lipase activity (Chu et al. Reference Chu, Soudant and Lund2003). In cells of some aquatic organisms and yeast (Lushchak, Reference Lushchak2011; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Shi and Jiang2015), including immune defence cells of bivalves (haemocytes, Hégaret et al. Reference Hégaret, Wikfors and Soudant2003; Chen et al. Reference Chen, Yang, Delaporte and Zhao2007), changes in temperature and salinity may alter the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Although these reactive molecules may be harmful to the cell itself at high concentrations, in some types of cells, they may act as secondary messengers in important physiological processes, such as cell differentiation and proliferation (see review by Sauer et al. Reference Sauer, Wartenberg and Hescheler2001).
In Brazil, to date, P. marinus has only been reported in the Northeast (NE) region. The first case of P. marinus was reported in oysters of the species Crassostrea rhizophorae in the estuary of the Paraíba do Norte River (State of Paraíba; da Silva et al. Reference da Silva, Tubino, Guertler, Ferreira, Santana, Fernández-boo, Ramilo, Cao and Villalba2013). Subsequently, this protozoan was detected infecting Crassostrea gasar oysters in the estuaries of the São Francisco River (State of Sergipe, da Silva et al. Reference da Silva, Scardua, Vianna, Mendonca, Vieira, Dungan, Scott and Reece2014) and the Mamanguape River (State of Paraíba, Queiroga et al. Reference Queiroga, Vianna, Vieira, Farias and da Silva2015). In these last two reports, P. olseni and Perkinsus beihaiensis species were also identified. In all of these studies, the prevalence of Perkinsus spp. was always high, reaching 100% in some cases.
Considering that high temperatures favour P. marinus infection and cause pathological consequences among C. virginica oysters and that in the Brazilian NE region high temperatures (mean maximum air temperature in Paraíba coast is 35 °C) predominate throughout the year, similar negative impacts might be expected among infected oysters in that region. However, in the NE of Brazil no mortality events were reported by oyster farmers or in the literature that could be associated with perkinsiosis. It is known though that when C. gasar oysters are infected by Perkinsus spp., the immune defence competence is reduced (i.e. numbers of haemocytes and proportions of their subtypes, phagocytic capacity and ROS production; Queiroga et al. Reference Queiroga, Marques-Santos, Hégaret, Soudant, Farias, Schlindwein and da Silva2013), which would contribute to the weakness of oysters making them more susceptible to opportunistic or pre-existing infections.
In the light of the above information, the present study aimed to evaluate the effects of salinity and temperature on the in vitro proliferation of P. marinus isolated from C. rhizophorae oysters in Brazil. For the first time, we analysed P. marinus cell viability and proliferation using parameters obtained by flow cytometry: cell density and morphology. It was possible to identify and to quantify the modifications of cell types that occurred under the effects of physical conditions. Moreover, ROS production was measured for the first time in Perkinsus sp. cells. Our results will help us in understanding the P. marinus infection dynamics (prevalence and intensity of infection) on the natural environment and the impact on potential hosts on the Brazilian coast.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Perkinsus marinus isolate
The polyclonal isolate of P. marinus (CR-PB192) was obtained from one C. rhizophorae oyster sampled from the rhizophores of the red mangrove tree (Rhizophora mangle) from the estuary of the Paraíba do Norte River (06°58′16·6″S and 34°51′45·1″W), State of Paraíba, NE Brazil. This region has an annual average of 1800 mm rainfall and 26 °C of air temperature. At this estuary, seawater salinity and temperature range between 5–40 psu and 27–32 °C, respectively (Queiroga et al. Reference Queiroga, Golzio, Santos, Martins and Vendel2012).
P. marinus trophozoites were isolated from infected gill fragments according to the protocol adapted from Casas et al. (Reference Casas, La Peyre, Reece, Azevedo and Villalba2002). The isolate was established on 5th May 2014 and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 Ham (Sigma, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA; DME–HAM/F12, Gauthier and Vasta, Reference Gauthier and Vasta1995) at 20 psu and 25 °C. The isolate was identified as P. marinus by PCR (ribosomal RNA gene complexes, Casas et al. Reference Casas, La Peyre, Reece, Azevedo and Villalba2002) and the sequence obtained was submitted to GenBank (accession number KT692955).
Effects of salinity and temperature on P. marinus in vitro proliferation
Two assays were performed independently to evaluate the effect of salinity and temperature on P. marinus in vitro proliferation. Prior to the assays, parasite cell suspension was held for 5 days of culture, and then rinsed by centrifugation (377 g for 10 min) and resuspended (106 cells mL−1) in DME–HAM/F12 medium.
Salinity effects were assessed by propagating the isolate in three different media prepared at salinities: 5, 20 (control) and 35 psu. For each of the salinities, the cell suspensions were distributed (4 replicates) into 24-well plates and kept at 25 °C. Temperature effects were assessed by propagating the isolate in the medium at 20 psu. Similarly, cell suspensions were distributed (4 replicates) into three 24-well plates, which were maintained at different temperatures: 15, 25 (control) and 35 °C. These values of temperature and salinities were chosen in order to provide future comparison with the data of the natural environment of oysters.
Perkinsus marinus cell analyses were performed at different times: after 24 h, 48 h, 7 days and 15 days. In addition, an assay was conducted (recovery assay) to evaluate the proliferation capacity of P. marinus upon return to control conditions of salinity (20 psu) and temperature (25 °C). For this purpose, a sample of the cell suspension, from each replicate and treatment (all salinity and temperature conditions), from the 15th day of the experiment was used. The suspension was centrifuged (377 g for 10 min) and resuspended (1:3) in DME–HAM/F12 medium at 20 psu (the cell concentrations were not adjusted) and kept at 25 °C for more 7 days (total of 22 days).
Two samples were taken from each well (4 replicates and 6 treatments = 24 samples) at each time (24 h and 48 h, 7th, 15th and 22nd day = 120 samples) to perform analyses on flow cytometry and light microscopy.
Flow cytometry analysis
The cell suspensions (4 replicates/treatment/time = 120 samples) were transferred to cytometry tubes and diluted in filtered sterile seawater with the same salinity used in the assays (1:1 until 48 h and 1:2 from the 7th day). The following parameters were analysed: cell morphology, density, viability and ROS production. Controls of unstained cells and dead cells (for viability assay) were used to adjust flow cytometer settings. The analyses were performed using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California, USA). The samples were subjected to 30 s readings (cell density and viability) or 10 000 events (ROS production). The data obtained were analysed using Flowing software (Version 2.5·1), and the cytogram images were obtained using FlowJo software (Version X).
Cell morphology and density
Cell morphology was obtained from the cytograms with the FSC (Forward Scatter) and SSC (Side Scatter) detectors, which indicate cell size and internal cellular granularity, respectively. FSC vs SSC cytograms were also used to estimate the total number of P. marinus cells; considering the sample dilution (Hégaret et al. Reference Hégaret, Wikfors and Soudant2003). The proportion (%) of each P. marinus cell population was estimated.
Cell viability
Cell death was evaluated with the fluorophore propidium iodide (Sigma, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA; final concentration of 10 µg mL−1), a double-stranded DNA intercalator incapable of crossing the plasma membranes of live cells. Unstained cells were also analysed. The percentage of cells with no fluorescence in the PE detector (564–606 nm) was determined to express cell viability (Soudant et al. Reference Soudant, Chu and Lund2005).
Production of ROS
The fluorophore 2′7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA, Sigma Saint Louis, Missouri, USA; final concentration of 10 µ m) was used for ROS analysis. The hydrophobic molecule enters the cell and is subsequently cleaved by intracellular esterases. The oxidation caused by intracellular ROS converts DCFH into DCF, which emits fluorescence (Hégaret et al. Reference Hégaret, Wikfors and Soudant2003; Lambert et al. Reference Lambert, Soudant, Choquet and Paillard2003). Reactive nitrogen species (RNS) may also oxidize DCFH (Wardman, Reference Wardman2007). Fluorescence was determined using the FITC detector (515–545 nm). Unstained cells were also analysed. ROS production was calculated by subtracting the geometric fluorescence mean of the labelled cells from the non-labelled cells.
Light microscopy analysis
Considering that different cell phases (trophozoites, schizonts and zoospores) of Perkinsus spp. develop on in vitro culture (Sunila et al. Reference Sunila, Hamilton and Dungan2001; Casas et al. Reference Casas, La Peyre, Reece, Azevedo and Villalba2002; Dang et al. Reference Dang, Dungan, Scott and Reece2015), light microscopy was used to correlate cell populations observed by this technique with those detected by flow cytometry.
The cell suspensions (4 replicates/treatment/time = 120 samples) were fixed in formaldehyde (final concentration of 2%) and used to identify and characterize (cell diameter and morphological description) each cell phase under a light microscope (Olympus BX45). Images of P. marinus cell cycle phases were taken with an Olympus Q-Color 5 digital camera.
Statistical analysis
Two-way factor (i.e. temperature or salinity and time) analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for all parameters (cell viability, cell density and ROS production), followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. Significant difference was set at P < 0·01. All data are reported as mean ± s.e. Data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5·0 software (San Diego, California, USA).
RESULTS
Perkinsus marinus phases in vitro
By light microscopy, throughout the salinity and temperature assays, two cell types were observed (trophozoites and schizonts; Fig. 1A–D). Trophozoites (Fig. 1A and B) had diameters ranging from 5·3 to 32·1 µm (11·8 ± 0·2 µm) and were characterized by the presence of a prominent droplet inside the major cytoplasmic vacuole, which contained few granules. Schizonts had diameters ranging from 11·3 to 36·9 µm (20·3 ± 0·3 µm) and were round or oval cells with opaque cytoplasm. Schizonts releasing small trophozoites were observed (Fig. 1C). Moreover, small trophozoite aggregates (i.e. clusters of sibling trophozoites) were observed, with the main axes ranging from 19·2 to 66·1 µm (37·9 ± 0·8 µm) (Fig. 1D).
Fig. 1. Perkinsus marinus cell types observed in in vitro cultures by light microscopy (pictures A – D) and depicted in flow citometry scatter plot (graphic E). (A) Small trophozoites. Note the peripheral nuclei (n), the large vacuole (v) containing a droplet (d) and the granules in the cytoplasm (g). (B) Large trophozoite. (C) Schizont releasing small trophozoites (t). (D) Cluster of sibling trophozoites. All micrograph bars = 10 µm. (E) Representative flow cytometry scatter plot of P. marinus cell populations. Dashed lines show the limits of considered intervals for small, medium and large (SM, ME and LA, respectively) cell size (FSC – log scale) and low, moderate and high (LO, MO and HI, respectively) granularity (SSC – log scale). Circles show the positions of Populations 1–4. Arrows indicate possible associations between the cell types observed by light microscopy and populations detected by flow citometry.
Flow cytometry morphological analyses (cell size vs granularity) indicated the presence of several cell populations, which are depicted in Fig. 1E and were numbered by the order they appeared in the cytograms. Population 1 consisted of small-sized and moderate-granularity cells; Population 2 consisted of medium-sized and moderate-granularity cells; Population 3 consisted of small-sized and low-granularity cells; and Population 4 consisted of large-sized and high-granularity cells.
Comparison of morphological characteristics of cell populations obtained with both methods (Fig. 1), indicates that: Populations 1 and 3 would correspond to small trophozoites (Fig. 1A) with higher and lower internal granularities (respectively), Population 2 would correspond to the large trophozoites (Fig. 1B) and schizonts (Fig. 1C), and Population 4 would correspond to clusters of sibling trophozoites (Fig. 1D).
Effect of salinity on in vitro P. marinus proliferation at 25 °C
Observation of cells under a light microscope showed the same patterns of occurrence of cell types at all salinities; trophozoites were observed at all-time points; however, the schizonts and clusters of sibling trophozoites appeared from the 7th and 15th day, respectively.
The flow cytometry analysis indicated changes in the presence and proportions of the P. marinus cell populations over time as shown in Fig. 2 and Table 1. However, at the lowest salinity (5 psu), the changes were distinct from those occurring at higher salinities (20 and 35 psu). Until 48 h, at 20 and 35 psu, P. marinus presented exclusively as Population 1, whereas at 5 psu, Population 2 emerged, corresponding to 70·5% (24 h) and 74·6% (48 h). Only on the 7th day, at 20 and 35 psu, did Population 2 appear, 98·3 and 86·2%, respectively. In contrast, at 5 psu, Population 2 subdivided into two distinct populations, 2A (42·2%) and 2B (39·1%); and Population 3 also emerged (3%). On the 15th day, increased morphological variability was observed in all treatments, with all showing the simultaneous presence of the Populations 2–4. However, Populations 1, 2A and 2B were sustained only at 5 psu (8·7, 11·8 and 21·6%, respectively). During the recovery period at 20 psu, cell morphology homogeneity was observed for all treatments; with Populations 1–4.
Fig. 2. Density plot of Perkinsus marinus cells maintained at 5, 20 and 35 psu (columns) at different times (24, 48 h, 7 days, 15 days and in the recovery; rows). The x-axis indicates cell size (FSC), and the y-axis indicate cell granularity (SSC), both in log scale. Ten thousand events are represented at each cytogram. Numbers (1, 2, 2A, 2B, 3 and 4) indicate different cell populations.
Table 1. Proportions (%) of Perkinsus marinus cell populations (Pop; 1, 2, 2A, 2B, 3 and 4) after culture at 5, 20 and 35 psu at different times (24h, 48 h, 7 days, 15 days and in the recovery). Data are reported as mean ± s.e. – Absent population. Superscripted letters A and B refer to populations 2A and 2B, respectively.
Cell density, viability and ROS production of P. marinus cultured under different salinities are shown in Fig. 3. There was no cell proliferation at any salinity tested until the 7th day (Fig. 3A). On the 15th day, cell density at 20 psu was significantly higher (P < 0·001) (3·7 ± 0·10 × 106 cells mL−1) than at 5 psu (2·1 ± 0·20 × 106 cells mL−1) and at 35 psu (2·5 ± 0·10 × 106 cells mL−1). However, in the recovery assay, the cell density previously at 35 psu (7·2 ± 0·04 × 106 cells mL−1) was the same as that observed at 20 psu (7·3 ± 0·20 × 106 cells mL−1) but was higher than that observed at the lowest salinity (4·4 ± 0·20 × 106 cells mL−1; P < 0·001).
Fig. 3. Cell density (A), cell viability (B) and ROS production (C) of Perkinsus marinus cells maintained at 5, 20 and 35 psu. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treatments for each time point (post hoc Bonferroni test; P ⩽ 0·01).
Perkinsus marinus cell viability at control salinity (20 psu) was maintained between 81·5 and 98·7% (91·3 ± 1·40%, Fig. 3B) throughout the study. For the other treatments, up to 48 h, only cells at the highest salinity (35 psu) presented reduced viability (79·2 ± 0·40%, P < 0·001). However, the cells maintained at 5 psu experienced slightly reduced viability on the 7th day (84·5 ± 2·20%, P < 0·001) and drastically reduced viability on the 15th day (31·3 ± 4·00%, P < 0·001). Curiously, the dead cells detected on the 7th day belonged mostly to Population 2B (83·2%), but not on the 15th day (28·8%). In all other cases, dead cells were evenly distributed in all populations. The cell viability at 35 psu (95·1 ± 1·50%) on the 7th and 15th day was equivalent to that of treatment at 20 psu. Recovery at 20 psu enabled cells previously at 5 psu to reach high viabilities (98·8 ± 0·10%) and values statistically equal to those of the other treatments.
ROS production (Fig. 3C) was higher for cells maintained at 5 and 35 psu only at 24 h (P < 0·01).
Effects of temperature on P. marinus proliferation at 20 psu
By light microscopy, it was observed that cell culture kept at extreme temperatures analysed (15 and 35 °C) only showed trophozoites phase until the 15th day, but those kept at 25 °C also had schizonts and clusters of sibling trophozoites from the 7th day. However, recovery at 25 °C enabled the occurrence of all cell types for each tested temperature.
Flow cytometry morphological analysis revealed changes in the presence and proportion of the P. marinus cell populations over time (Fig. 4 and Table 2). Notably, these modifications occurred slowly at extreme temperatures (15 and 35 °C). Up until 48 h, P. marinus cells presented exclusively as Population 1 at all temperatures. On the 7th day, the cells maintained at low temperature (15 °C) sustained Population 1, whereas those kept at the highest temperature (35 °C) developed Population 2 (83%), and those kept at 25 °C showed Populations 2–4 (40·8, 39·3 and 19·9%, respectively). On the 15th day, Population 2 emerged at the extreme temperatures (15 °C: 72·4%; 35 °C: 90·3%), together with Population 1 (15 °C: 27·6%; 35 °C: 9·7%); whereas control temperature sustained Populations 2–4, although with different proportions (8·5, 83·6 and 7·9%, respectively). Recovery period at 25 °C induced cell changes for all treatments, although in different ways; the cells kept at 15 °C presented as Populations 1–4, those kept at 25 °C presented as Populations 1–3, while at 35 °C presented as Populations 2–4.
Fig. 4. Density plot of Perkinsus marinus cells maintained at 15, 25 and 35 °C (columns) at different times (24, 48 h, 7 days, 15 days and in the recovery; rows). The x-axis indicates cell size (FSC), and the y-axis indicates cell granularity (SSC), both in log scale. Ten thousand events are represented at each cytogram. Numbers (1, 2, 3 and 4) indicate different cell populations.
Table 2. Proportions (%) of Perkinsus marinus cell populations (Pop; 1, 2, 3 and 4) after culture at 15, 25 and 35 °C at different times (24 h, 48 h, 7 days, 15 days and in the recovery). Data are reported as mean ± s.e. – Absent population.
Cell density, viability and ROS production of P. marinus cultured under different temperatures are shown in Fig. 5. Perkinsus marinus cell density did not differ among temperatures until the 7th day (Fig. 5A). After 15 days, the cells maintained at 25 °C reached a cell density higher (9·3 ± 0·70 × 106 cells mL−1) than those of the other treatments (15 °C: 1·1 ± 0·01 × 106 cells mL−1 and 35 °C: 1·53 ± 0·05 × 106 cells mL−1; P < 0·001). Recovery at 25 °C did not modify the density of P. marinus cells kept at the highest temperature (35 °C: 1·7 ± 0·05 × 106 cells mL−1), but induced their proliferation at the lowest temperature (15 °C: 3·3 ± 0·10 × 106 cells mL−1). The density of cells kept at 25 °C (8·1 ± 0·50 × 106 cells mL−1) was higher (P < 0·001) than to those of the other temperatures.
Fig. 5. Cell density (A), cell viability (B) and ROS production (C) of Perkinsus marinus cells maintained at 15, 25 and 35 °C. Values are expressed as mean ± standard error. Asterisks indicate significant differences between treatments for each time point (post hoc Bonferroni test; P ⩽ 0·01).
The cell viability of P. marinus cultured at 25 °C was high and constant throughout the experiment (97·4 ± 0·50%; Fig. 5B), but cells kept at a lower temperature (15 °C) exhibited an abrupt drop in viability after 48 h (87·1 ± 0·30%; P < 0·01), and further down after the 7th (58·3 ± 1·20%, P < 0·01) and 15th days (67·5 ± 0·80%) (P < 0·01). In contrast, cells kept at 35 °C showed a slight decrease in viability only on the 15th day (91·7 ± 3·30%; P < 0·01). In the recovery assay at 25 °C, the viability of cells kept at 15 °C (96·9 ± 2·50%) was equivalent to that of cells kept at 25 °C, whereas those maintained at 35 °C exhibited a significant reduction in viability (68·3 ± 3·90%; P < 0·001). In all conditions, dead cells were evenly distributed in all populations.
ROS production by P. marinus did not differ between the temperatures tested until 48 h (Fig. 5C). On the 7th day, cells kept at 35 °C presented ROS production higher than that of cells kept at 25 °C (P < 0·001), and those kept at 15 °C showed intermediate ROS production. On the 15th day, cells kept at 15 and 35 °C presented ROS production values higher than those of cells maintained at 25 °C (P < 0·01). In the recovery assay, ROS production was the same for all temperatures.
DISCUSSION
The identification and in vitro propagation of P. marinus occurred for the first time in Brazil in 2013, derived from tissues of C. rhizophorae oysters from the estuary of the Paraíba do Norte River (NE, Brazil; da Silva et al. Reference da Silva, Tubino, Guertler, Ferreira, Santana, Fernández-boo, Ramilo, Cao and Villalba2013). Since then, this protozoan parasite and others of the same genus (P. olseni and P. beihaiensis) have been identified as parasites of the C. gasar oyster (Queiroga et al. Reference Queiroga, Vianna, Vieira, Farias and da Silva2015; da Silva et al. Reference da Silva, Scardua, Vianna, Mendonca, Vieira, Dungan, Scott and Reece2014). However, P. olseni and P. beihaiensis have not yet been isolated and cultivated from Brazilian hosts.
Several in vivo (Oliver et al. Reference Oliver, Fisher, Ford, Calvo, Burreson, Sutton and Gandy1998; Villalba et al. Reference Villalba, Casas, López and Carballal2005; Gullian-Klanian et al. Reference Gullian-Klanian, Herrera-Silveira, Rodríguez-Canul and Aguirre-Macedo2008) and in vitro (Burreson et al. Reference Burreson, Ragone Calvo, La Peyre, Counts and Paynter1994; Burreson and Ragone Calvo, Reference Burreson and Ragone Calvo1996; La Peyre et al. Reference La Peyre, Casas and La Peyre2006, Reference La Peyre, Casas, Gayle and La Peyre2010; Umeda et al. Reference Umeda, Shimokawa and Yoshinaga2013) studies indicate that the protozoa of the genus Perkinsus are, in general, sensitive to extreme salinity and temperature conditions. The present study was the first to evaluate the effects of these two abiotic conditions on the physiology of P. marinus isolated from a Brazilian native host. The results indicate that the Brazilian P. marinus isolate is also sensitive to extreme temperature and salinity conditions, although in a more pronounced way than others isolates.
In the present study, trophozoites and schizonts, typical Perkinsus cells cultured in vitro (La Peyre et al. Reference La Peyre, Faisal and Burreson1993; Ordás and Figueras, Reference Ordás and Figueras1998; Sunila et al. Reference Sunila, Hamilton and Dungan2001; Dang et al. Reference Dang, Dungan, Scott and Reece2015), were observed by microscopy. The development of one cell type into another was inferred from the morphological profile obtained by flow cytometry analysis and confirmed by microscopy. Here, cell density and morphological changes were analysed together by flow cytometry and used successfully to determine the P. marinus proliferation.
Among the cell types observed by microscopy, trophozoites showed three distinct morphological patterns (Populations 1–3) when observed on cytograms. Populations 1 and 3 presented cells with the same size (the smallest cells observed), but different granularities. These cell populations may represent different trophozoite developmental phases (La Peyre et al. Reference La Peyre, Faisal and Burreson1993; Sunila et al. Reference Sunila, Hamilton and Dungan2001; Robledo et al. Reference Robledo, Nunes, Cancela and Vasta2002; Casas et al. Reference Casas, Reece, Li, Moss, Villalba and La Peyre2008). The difference in granularity may be associated with the capacity of P. marinus to store lipids in the form of cytoplasmic droplets (Chu et al. Reference Chu, Soudant, Volety and Huang2000, Reference Chu, Soudant and Lund2003). These lipids can be used for synthesis of structural components, mainly membranes, throughout its growth (Soudant and Chu, Reference Soudant and Chu2001; Chu et al. Reference Chu, Soudant, Volety and Huang2000, Reference Chu, Lund, Soudant and Harvey2002; Lund et al. Reference Lund, Chu and Harvey2004). Lipid bodies accumulation also occurs with the intracellular parasite Giardia lamblia in culture (Stevens et al. Reference Stevens, Gibson, Adam, Maier, Allison-Ennis and Das1997). Therefore, Population 1 would include older trophozoites than Population 3 because they would have accumulated more granules.
Over time, trophozoites increase in size (Fig. 1B) and undergo successive internal divisions, becoming schizonts (Fig. 1C), which contain immature trophozoites inside (Sunila et al. Reference Sunila, Hamilton and Dungan2001; Casas et al. Reference Casas, La Peyre, Reece, Azevedo and Villalba2002; Dang et al. Reference Dang, Dungan, Scott and Reece2015). Large trophozoites and schizonts probably are contained in Population 2 because of their similar size. When the new trophozoites grow, they eventually rupture the schizont's membrane and remain aggregated for some time (Ordás and Figueras, Reference Ordás and Figueras1998; Sunila et al. Reference Sunila, Hamilton and Dungan2001), as observed here under the light microscopy analysis, and suggested to be Population 4 (flow cytometry). Therefore, clusters of sibling trophozoites were observed as individual events in the cytograms. Immature trophozoites will be released from the clusters to replenish Population 3. The simultaneous presence of Populations 3 and 4 confirms the hypothesis of the cell cycle described above.
In the assay evaluating the effects of salinity and temperature, control conditions (20 psu and 25 °C) were the most favourable to P. marinus cell development, allowing sustained cell viability, cell phase changes and increase in density. In contrast, only at 5 psu, Population 3 (small trophozoites) emerged on the 7th day, without clusters of sibling trophozoites development. This fact could be explained by an effect of low salinity inducing schizont rupture and the rapid separation of trophozoites from the cluster. Moreover, the subdivision of Population 2 into 2A and 2B could not be simply explained by the high mortality observed in Population 2B (7th day), because cell death causes loss of membrane integrity, thus increasing cell size but not granularity, which as observed here. Instead, this fact corroborates the hypothesis discussed above; i.e. the presence of large trophozoites and schizonts in Population 2 (2A and 2B). Nevertheless, low salinity did not interfere with the progress of P. marinus cell phase changes, because the composition of cell populations was similar to that at the other salinities (15th and recovery).
The decrease of P. marinus proliferation at low salinities, as observed in this study, is a known phenomenon (La Peyre et al. Reference La Peyre, Casas and La Peyre2006, Reference La Peyre, Casas, Gayle and La Peyre2010) associated with perkinsiosis infection dynamics (Oliver et al. Reference Oliver, Fisher, Ford, Calvo, Burreson, Sutton and Gandy1998; Villalba et al. Reference Villalba, Reece, Camino Ordás, Casas and Figueras2004; Gullian-Klanian et al. Reference Gullian-Klanian, Herrera-Silveira, Rodríguez-Canul and Aguirre-Macedo2008; Soniat et al. Reference Soniat, Klinck, Powell and Hofmann2012).
The low density of cells at 35 psu on the 15th day and the reduction in their viability until 48 h indicate that high salinity is also deleterious to the development of P. marinus from Brazil. Interestingly, at that time point, at both high and low salinity, the development of proliferative stages (schizonts and clusters of sibling trophozoites) was not affected. It is possible that extreme salinities caused a decrease in the proliferation rate, i.e. schizogony was not totally avoided but occurred at a slower pace and did not result in an increase in cell number.
Unlike salinity, there was no P. marinus proliferation at extreme temperatures (15 and 35 °C) until the 15th day. Other studies have observed that the optimal temperatures for the proliferation of P. marinus isolated from the American oyster C. virginica were between 15 and 35 °C (Dungan and Hamilton, Reference Dungan and Hamilton1995; Gauthier and Vasta, Reference Gauthier and Vasta1995). In the case of P. olseni isolated from Ruditapes philippinarum from Japan (Umeda et al. Reference Umeda, Shimokawa and Yoshinaga2013), the optimal temperatures ranged between 20 and 34 °C. However, for an isolate of Ruditapes decussatus from Europe (Ordás and Figueras, Reference Ordás and Figueras1998), the temperatures were lower (between 16 and 26 °C). The low proliferation of P. marinus when kept at 35 °C suggests that this isolate may be more sensitive to high temperatures than those mentioned above, but apparently equally as sensitive as the European P. olseni isolate.
The available studies focusing on in vitro proliferation of Perkinsus spp. contemplate only cell responses of the parasite under a single temperature and salinity condition (Dungan and Hamilton, Reference Dungan and Hamilton1995; Ordás and Figueras, Reference Ordás and Figueras1998; La Peyre et al. Reference La Peyre, Casas and La Peyre2006, Reference La Peyre, Casas, Gayle and La Peyre2010; Umeda et al. Reference Umeda, Shimokawa and Yoshinaga2013). The present study also evaluated the response of P. marinus to its return to control temperature and salinity conditions. In this experiment, we aimed to evaluate the capacity of the parasite to recover from a potential stress situation. These assays could yield results closer to what is observed in the natural environment of oysters where the parasite is subjected to salinity and temperature fluctuations. Such fluctuations are typical of estuarine environments, where the tidal cycle and freshwater supply cause changes in the hydrological conditions.
In the recovery assessment, cells originally maintained at 5 and 35 psu and at 15 °C showed induction of proliferation accompanied by increased cell viability. These observations suggest that P. marinus has a strong capacity to recover after osmotic stress and a low temperature. Interestingly, recovery did not occur in the case of exposure to 35 °C. It is possible that the thermal stress suffered could have caused irreversible damage to the cells, contributing to their death. These observations could also explain why, despite the high prevalence of P. marinus among oysters in the NE region of Brazil, where high temperatures predominate, no mortality events have been reported to date (farmers, personal communication; da Silva et al. Reference da Silva, Tubino, Guertler, Ferreira, Santana, Fernández-boo, Ramilo, Cao and Villalba2013, Reference da Silva, Scardua, Vianna, Mendonca, Vieira, Dungan, Scott and Reece2014; Queiroga et al. Reference Queiroga, Vianna, Vieira, Farias and da Silva2015). In this case, the high temperature in the NE region would be a limiting factor to the proliferation of the parasite.
The amount of ROS in the P. marinus cells was also affected in response to changes in salinity and temperature, although in a different way. This cell parameter has never been studied in protozoa belonging to this genus. What is known is how the parasite avoids the lytic molecules (ROS and RNS) produced and released by the host's defence cells (see review by Soudant et al. Reference Soudant, E Chu and Volety2013).
In marine organisms, responses to increase in seawater temperature activate metabolic processes, resulting in increased ROS levels (Lushchak, Reference Lushchak2011). Thus, this would explain the results observed in the present study when parasites were cultured at 35 °C. However, this mechanism does not explain the case of low temperature, which also induced ROS production. Lushchak (Reference Lushchak2011) speculates that in these rare cases, anti-oxidation mechanisms may be inhibited, although this possibility has not been confirmed. During the recovery period, P. marinus ROS values were equivalent to those under control conditions, supporting the direct association of this cell parameter with temperature. In marine animals, intracellular ROS production is also increased in cases of any transient changes (increases or decreases) in salinity. This increase derives from adaptations at the cell level, for example in the activity of proteins involved in energy metabolism and electrolytic balance (Lushchak, Reference Lushchak2011). This phenomenon may have occurred in the case of P. marinus cells transitioning from a salinity of 20 psu to 5 or 35 psu, but for a short period (24 h).
The sustained elevation of ROS levels in P. marinus cells kept at 35 °C may have contributed to these cells’ inability to recover (as indicated by low cell proliferation and viability). Oxidative stress is a condition classically known to generate deleterious effects, such as lipid peroxidation (Mylonas and Kouretas, Reference Mylonas and Kouretas1999), protein oxidation (Stadtman and Berlett, Reference Stadtman and Berlett1998) and even DNA oxidation (Cooke et al. Reference Cooke, Evans, Dizdaroglu and Lunec2003; Kelly et al. Reference Kelly, White and Smyth2008). Nevertheless, the same does not apply to P. marinus cells kept at 15 °C because these specimens were able to recover even after being exposed to high ROS concentrations. It is probable that ROS do not cause the same effects at low temperatures, which could act as a protector.
In protozoa of the genus Leishmania, an increase in the ROS concentration is directly associated with the parasite's life cycle (Mittra and Andrews, Reference Mittra and Andrews2013). A transient increase in the H2O2 concentration occurs before differentiation of the promastigote form into the amastigote form in cell culture. In this context, the ROS levels in P. marinus could also be associated with cell phase changes, since the sustained high ROS levels observed (15 and 35 °C) could have promoted the arrest in trophozoite phase (microscopy observation).
In temperate regions, infection by Perkinsus sp. follows temperature variations, and higher infection rates are reported in the warmer seasons and in higher salinity environments (Choi and Park, Reference Choi, Park, Ishimatsu and Lie2010; Villalba et al. Reference Villalba, Gestal, Casas, Figueras, Figueras and Novoa2011). The data provided in the present study suggest that the P. marinus isolated from the estuary of the Paraíba do Norte River is sensitive to both low and high temperatures and salinities. This estuary is located in the tropical region of Brazil, where the temperature varies little and the seasons are defined according to the rainfall (dry and wet seasons); rain in the autumn and winter (May–September) and dry conditions in the spring and summer (October–April). Thus, temperature would have less influence on the dynamics of infection by P. marinus in this region, but salinity would have a major role, causing temporal (through rainfall) and spatial (through localization up or down the river in the estuary) changes in perkinsiosis. Field studies in oyster populations in the NE region of Brazil focusing on Perkinsus spp. infection dynamics corroborate this hypothesis, such as low infection in the upper river and in the rainy season (Brandão et al. Reference Brandão, Boehs, Sabry, Ceuta, Luz, Queiroga and da Silva2013; da Silva et al. Reference da Silva, Scardua, Vianna, Mendonca, Vieira, Dungan, Scott and Reece2014; Queiroga et al. Reference Queiroga, Vianna, Vieira, Farias and da Silva2015).
Based on the present study's data, we conclude that the P. marinus protozoan isolated from the C. rhizophorae oyster, an oyster native to the NE region of Brazil, presents in vitro higher sensitivity to extreme salinity and temperatures than other P. marinus isolates. Flow cytometry was an effective technique for studying physiological and proliferative (by cell morphological changes and density) aspects of the parasite. Our results will contribute to the understanding the dynamics of perkinsiosis in tropical regions and the impact of the P. marinus on hosts, which is of great relevance for predicting or preventing economic and environmental impacts.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Laboratório de Farmacologia e Aplicação de Produtos Bioativos (LFAPBIO/IDEP) for allowing the use of the flow cytometer. We thank Dr Robson C. Veras and Dr Fátima L. A. A. Azevedo for their technical assistance.
FINANCIAL SUPPORT
We thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq for financial support to the project CNPq/MPA No. 406170/2012-6 (to M. P.de S). We sincerely appreciate the scholarship provided for MSc. Fernando R. Queiroga from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). We finally thank the Universidade Federal da Paraíba for financial support to English editing service.
Open access
