Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:48:27.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Testing the cultural group selection hypothesis in Northern Ghana and Oaxaca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2016

Cristina Acedo-Carmona
Affiliation:
Human Evolution and Cognition, University of the Balearic Islands, Campus Carretera Valldemossa, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain. [email protected]@uib.catwww.evocog.organtonigomila.wordpress.com
Antoni Gomila
Affiliation:
Human Evolution and Cognition, University of the Balearic Islands, Campus Carretera Valldemossa, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain. [email protected]@uib.catwww.evocog.organtonigomila.wordpress.com

Abstract

We examine the cultural group selection (CGS) hypothesis in light of our fieldwork in Northern Ghana and Oaxaca, highly multi-ethnic regions. Our evidence fails to corroborate two central predictions of the hypothesis: that the cultural group is the unit of evolution, and that cultural homogenization is to be expected as the outcome of a selective process.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acedo-Carmona, C. & Gomila, A. (2013) Trust and cooperation: A new experimental approach. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1299:7783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acedo-Carmona, C. & Gomila, A. (2014a) Diversidad étnica, clanes y familias en Ghana: Plataforma económica, social y cultural. In: Periferias, Fronteras y Diálogos. Actas del XIII Congreso de Antropología de la Federación de Asociaciones de Antropología del Estado Español, ed. Lundsteen, N., Martínez-Veiga, U. & Palomera, J., pp. 2519–45. Universitat Rovira i Virgili. Available at: http://wwwa.fundacio.urv.cat/congres-antropologia/.Google Scholar
Acedo-Carmona, C. & Gomila, A. (2014b) Personal trust increases cooperation beyond general trust. PLoS ONE 9(8):e105559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acedo-Carmona, C. & Gomila, A. (2015) Trust matters: A cross-cultural comparison of Northern Ghana and Oaxaca groups. Frontiers in Psychology 6(661). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvard, M. S. (2003) The adaptive nature of culture. Evolutionary Anthropology 12:136–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhugra, D. & Becker, M. A. (2005) Migration, cultural bereavement and cultural identity. World Psychiatry 4(1):1824.Google ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y. & Xin Li, S. (2009) Group identity and social preferences. The American Economic Review 99(1):431–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, R. & Gamble, C. (2009) The ecology of social transitions in human evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 364:3267–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henzi, S. P., de Sousa Pereira, L. F., Hawker-Bond, D., Stiller, J., Dunbar, R. I. M. & Barrett, L. (2007) Look who's talking: Developmental trends in the size of conversational cliques. Evolution and Human Behavior 28:6674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäs, M. & Dijkstra, J. (2014) Do intergroup conflicts necessarily result from outgroup hate? PLoS One 9(6):e97848.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, R. (1993) Making democracy work. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. G. B., Dunbar, R. I. M., Pollet, T. V. & Kuppens, T. (2009) Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics. Social Networks 31:138–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiller, J. & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007) Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size. Social Networks 29:93104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanis, M. & Postmes, T. (2005) A social identity approach to trust: Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 35:413–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, W. X., Sornette, D., Hill, R. A. & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2005) Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272:439–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed