Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:35:58.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are gesture and speech mismatches produced by an integrated gesture-speech system? A more dynamically embodied perspective is needed for understanding gesture-related learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2017

Wim T. J. L. Pouw ,
Tamara van Gog ,
Rolf A. Zwaan  and
Fred Paas
Wim T. J. L. Pouw
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3062 PA, The Netherlands. [email protected]@fsw.eur.nl
Tamara van Gog
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3062 PA, The Netherlands. [email protected]@fsw.eur.nl Department of Education, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3508 TC, The Netherlands. [email protected]
Rolf A. Zwaan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3062 PA, The Netherlands. [email protected]@fsw.eur.nl
Fred Paas
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam 3062 PA, The Netherlands. [email protected]@fsw.eur.nl Early Start Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We observe a tension in the target article as it stresses an integrated gesture-speech system that can nevertheless consist of contradictory representational states, which are reflected by mismatches in gesture and speech or sign. Beyond problems of coherence, this prevents furthering our understanding of gesture-related learning. As a possible antidote, we invite a more dynamically embodied perspective to the stage.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e68
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cappuccio, M. L., Chu, M. & Kita, S. (2013) Pointing as an instrumental gesture: Gaze representation through indication. Humana Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 24:125–49.Google Scholar
Chu, M. & Kita, S. (2008) Spontaneous gestures during mental rotation tasks: Insights into the microdevelopment of the motor strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 137(4):706–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A. (2013) Gesture as thought. In: The hand, an organ of the mind: What the manual tells the mental, ed. Radman, Z., pp. 255–68. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003a) Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. (2001) Perception and action: Alternative views. Synthese 129(1):3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouw, W. T. J. L., De Nooijer, J. A., Van Gog, T., Zwaan, R. A. & Paas, F. (2014) Toward a more embedded/extended perspective on the cognitive function of gestures. Frontiers in Psychology 5:359.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. L. & Black, T. (1999) Inferences through imagined actions: Knowing by simulated doing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition 25:116–36.Google Scholar