No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Beyond the negative: Political attitudes and ideologies strategically manage opportunities, too
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 June 2014
Abstract
Hibbing et al. use evolutionarily derived logic to suggest that political attitudes are related to responses to negative features of the environment. We suggest that the authors focus too narrowly on the negative and contend, instead, that a more comprehensive evolutionary approach focusing on people's responses to threats and opportunities will better account for variation in political attitudes.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
References
Ackerman, J., Shapiro, J. R., Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Schaller, M., Becker, D. V., Griskevicius, V. & Maner, J. K. (2006) They all look the same to me (unless they're angry): From out-group homogeneity to out-group heterogeneity. Psychological Science
17:836–40.Google Scholar
Ackerman, J. M., Becker, D. V., Mortensen, C. R., Sasaki, T., Neuberg, S. L. & Kenrick, D. T. (2009) A pox on the mind: Disjunction of attention and memory in the processing of physical disfigurement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
45:478–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durante, K. M., Rae, A. & Griskevicius, V. (2013) The fluctuating female vote: Politics, religion, and the ovulatory cycle. Psychological Science
24(6):1007–16. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797612466416.Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B. & Kenrick, D. T. (2006a) Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: The effects of romantic motives on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
91:63–76.Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Cialdini, R. B. & Kenrick, D. T. (2006b) Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
91:281–94.Google Scholar
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Ackerman, J. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E. & White, A. E. (2012) The financial consequences of too many men: Sex ratio effects on saving, borrowing, and spending. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
102:69–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Gangestad, S. W., Perea, E. F., Shapiro, J. R. & Kenrick, D. T. (2009) Aggress to impress: Hostility as an evolved context-dependent mating strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
96:980–94.Google Scholar
Kurzban, R., Dukes, A. & Weeden, J. (2010) Sex, drugs and moral goals: Reproductive strategies and views about recreational drugs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
277(1699):3501–508.Google Scholar
Li, Y. J., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V. & Neuberg, S. L. (2012) Economic decision biases and fundamental motivations: How mating and self-protection alter loss aversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
102:550–61.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Delton, A. W., Hofer, B., Wilbur, C. J. & Neuberg, S. L. (2003) Sexually selective cognition: Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
85:1107–20.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Robertson, T. E., Hofer, B., Neuberg, S. L., Delton, A. W., Butner, J. & Schaller, M. (2005) Functional projection: How fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
88:63–78.Google Scholar
Mortensen, C. R., Becker, D. V., Ackerman, J. M., Neuberg, S. L. & Kenrick, D. T. (2010) Infection breeds reticence: The effects of disease salience on self-perceptions of personality and behavioral avoidance tendencies. Psychological Science
21:440–47.Google Scholar
Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T. & Schaller, M. (2010) Evolutionary social psychology. In: Handbook of social psychology, ed. Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. & Lindzey, G., pp. 761–96. Wiley.Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Sznycer, D., Sell, A., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2013) The ancestral logic of politics: Upper-body strength regulates men's assertion of self-interest over economic redistribution. Psychological Science
24(7):1098–103. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797612466415.Google Scholar
Price, M. E., Kang, J., Dunn, J. & Hopkins, S. (2011) Muscularity and attractiveness as predictors of human egalitarianism. Personality and Individual Differences
50:636–40.Google Scholar
Sundie, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Vohs, K. D. & Beal, D. J. (2011) Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
100(4):664–80. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021669.Google Scholar
Weeden, J. (2003) Genetic interests, life histories, and attitudes towards abortion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
White, A. E., Kenrick, D. T., Li, Y. J., Mortensen, C. R., Neuberg, S. L. & Cohen, A. B. (2012) When nasty breeds nice: Threats of violence amplify agreeableness at national, individual, and situational levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
103:622–34.Google Scholar
White, A. E., Kenrick, D. T., Neel, R. & Neuberg, S. L. (2013a) From the bedroom to the budget deficit: Mate competition changes men's attitudes toward economic redistribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
105(6): 924–40. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0033808.Google Scholar
White, A. E., Kenrick, D. T. & Neuberg, S. L. (2013b) Beauty at the ballot box: Disease threats increase preferences for physically attractive leaders. Psychological Science
24:2429–36.Google Scholar
White, A. E., Li, Y. J., Griskevicius, V., Kenrick, D. T. & Neuberg, S. L. (2013c) Putting all your eggs in one basket: Life history strategies, bet hedging, and economic diversification. Psychological Science
24:715–22.Google Scholar
Target article
Beyond the negative: Political attitudes and ideologies strategically manage opportunities, too
Related commentaries (1)
Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology