Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-22T05:47:28.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antimicrobial resistance profiles and molecular epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Scottish bovine mastitis cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2025

Jolinda Pollock*
Affiliation:
Microbiology Department, SRUC Veterinary Services, Edinburgh/Inverness, UK
Geoffrey Foster
Affiliation:
Microbiology Department, SRUC Veterinary Services, Edinburgh/Inverness, UK
Katrina Henderson
Affiliation:
Microbiology Department, SRUC Veterinary Services, Edinburgh/Inverness, UK
Jennifer Bell
Affiliation:
Microbiology Department, SRUC Veterinary Services, Edinburgh/Inverness, UK
Michael R. Hutchings
Affiliation:
Animal and Veterinary Sciences, SRUC, Edinburgh, UK
Gavin K. Paterson
Affiliation:
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
*
Corresponding author: Jolinda Pollock; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Klebsiella pneumoniae are opportunistic pathogens which can cause mastitis in dairy cattle. K. pneumoniae mastitis often has a poor cure rate and can lead to the development of chronic infection, which has an impact on both health and production. However, there are few studies which aim to fully characterize K. pneumoniae by whole-genome sequencing from bovine mastitis cases. Here, K. pneumoniae isolates associated with mastitis in dairy cattle were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and whole-genome sequencing. Furthermore, whole-genome sequence data were used for phylogenetic analyses and both virulence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prediction, in parallel with phenotypic AMR testing. Forty-two isolates identified as K. pneumoniae were subject to whole-genome sequencing, with 31 multi-locus sequence types being observed, suggesting the source of these isolates was likely environmental. Isolates were examined for key virulence determinants encoding acquired siderophores, colibactin, and hypermucoidy. The majority of these were absent, except for ybST (encoding yersiniabactin) which was present in six isolates. Across the dataset, there were notable levels of phenotypic AMR against streptomycin (26.2%) and tetracycline (19%), and intermediate susceptibility to cephalexin (26.2%) and neomycin (21.4%). Of importance was the detection of two ESBL-producing isolates, which demonstrated multi-drug resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, streptomycin, tetracycline, cefotaxime, cephalexin, and cefquinome.

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Mastitis is a prevalent and important disease in cattle worldwide, which has significant health, welfare, and economic impacts [Reference Petersson-Wolfe, Leslie and Swartz1Reference Klaas and Zadoks3]. Mastitis control programmes have primarily focussed on contagious mastitis pathogens and not environmental opportunists [Reference Fu, Wen and Wang4]. Environmental mastitis can be caused by a large range of bacteria, with one of the most predominant and clinically significant being K. pneumoniae [Reference Fu, Wen and Wang4Reference Zadoks, Griffiths and Munoz6]. K. pneumoniae is one of the most common coliforms causing clinical bovine mastitis, but has been found to be one of the most damaging when considering milk production [Reference Gröhn, Wilson and González7], treatment costs [Reference Fu, Wen and Wang4], and mortality rate [Reference Oliveira, Hulland and Ruegg5]. K. pneumoniae mastitis has a poor cure rate after antimicrobial treatment [Reference Oliveira, Hulland and Ruegg5, Reference Schukken, Chuff and Moroni8, Reference Fuenzalida and Ruegg9], and although it is commonly an environmental opportunist, lateral spread from diseased to healthy cattle is possible [Reference Schukken, Bennett and Zurakowski10].

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an ongoing concern in both animal and human health settings. Due to the ubiquitous nature of K. pneumoniae, there are varied reports on the AMR potential in these strains. In some previous work, it has been shown that K. pneumoniae isolates from milk showed low levels of AMR [Reference Saini, McClure and Léger11Reference Massé, Dufour and Archambault13]. However, there have been reports of multi-drug resistant K. pneumoniae isolated from bovine mastitis cases from several countries [Reference Koovapra, Bandyopadhyay and Das14Reference Saishu, Ozaki and Murase16], including the United Kingdom [Reference Timofte, Maciuc and Evans17], most of which are extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers. More concerning reports have also emerged describing carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae isolates from cattle milk [Reference Silva-Sanchez, Barrios-Camacho and Hernández-Rodriguez18, Reference He, Wang, Sun and Pang19], highlighting the importance of ongoing disease and AMR surveillance.

Whole-genome sequencing, in combination with diagnostic laboratory identification and antimicrobial sensitivity testing (AST), gives a comprehensive insight into bacterial epidemiology, virulence potential, and AMR. Here, these methodologies are used to characterise K. pneumoniae isolates from mastitis cases in Scotland between 2009 and 2021.

Materials and methods

Isolates and primary identification

Forty-two isolates, previously identified as K. pneumoniae from clinical or sub-clinical mastitis cases that had been stored on glycerol beads (SRUC Veterinary Services’ Pathogen Bank) at −80 °C, were revived by culture on Columbia agar supplemented with sheep blood (Oxoid, United Kingdom), incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 h. Isolates were obtained from cattle showing signs of sub-clinical or clinical mastitis between 2009 and 2021. Further details of these isolates and a summary of clinical histories are available in Supplementary Table S1.

Isolates were identified on initial isolation using API 20E strips (Biomerieux, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. As part of this study, isolates were also identified post hoc by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry using a Microflex LT/SH Biotyper (MALDI-TOF MS) (Bruker, Germany). Briefly, single and well-isolated colonies were spotted directly in duplicate onto Disposable MBT Biotarget 96 target plates (Bruker, Germany) using the direct transfer method. Spots were then overlaid with 1 μl of α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA) matrix and allowed to dry, prior to transfer to the instrument. The generated spectra were then subject to best match identification and confidence scoring, with scores of ≥2.00 deemed as good identifications.

Whole-genome sequencing

Whole-genome sequencing was performed by Microbes NG (University of Birmingham, UK), as described previously [Reference Foster, Robb and Paterson20]. Briefly, genomic DNA was extracted using solid-phase reversible immobilisation beads, and genomic DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT Library Prep Kit (Illumina) following the manufacturer’s protocol with the following modifications: input DNA is increased by twofold, and PCR elongation time is increased to 45 s. Libraries were sequenced using Illumina sequencers (HiSeq/NovaSeq) using a 250-bp paired-end protocol. Reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic version 0.30 [Reference Bolger, Lohse and Usadel21], using a sliding window quality cut-off of 15. Genome assembly was carried out de novo using SPAdes, version 3.7, with default parameters for 250 bp Illumina reads [Reference Bankevich, Nurk and Antipov22] and annotated by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v6.6 [Reference Seemann23]. Contigs <200 bp were manually removed, and contaminant sequences were automatically removed during upload to NCBI via the NCBI Foreign Contamination Screen [Reference Astashyn, Tvedte and Sweeney24]. Genome assemblies were uploaded and analysed using Pathogenwatch [Reference Argimón, David and Underwood25] v22.1.1 (https://pathogen.watch/) and Kleborate v2.3.0 [Reference Lam, Wick and Watts26] incorporated therein. Resultant trees were annotated using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) [Reference Letunic and Bork27, Reference Letunic and Bork28].

Antimicrobial sensitivity testing

AST using nine antimicrobials – amoxicillin–clavulanic acid 30 μg, ertapenem 10 μg, streptomycin 10 μg, enrofloxacin 5 μg, tetracyline 30 μg, cefotaxime 5 μg, cephalexin 30 μg, neomycin 30 μg, and cefquinome 30 μg (Oxoid, United Kingdom). The EUCAST disc diffusion method was used on Mueller–Hinton Agar (Oxoid, United Kingdom) using EUCAST [29], CLSI Vet [30], and CASFM Vétérinaire [31] guidelines. Namely, antimicrobial sensitivity was assessed for amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, ertapenem, streptomycin, enrofloxacin, tetracycline, cefotaxime, cephalexin, neomycin, and cefquinome. Isolates that were highlighted as potential extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers by AST were subject to ESBL screening using a commercially available ESBL, AmpC, and carbapenemase activity kit (MAST, United Kingdom).

Results

Species identification of bovine mastitis isolates

Forty-two bovine mastitis isolates initially identified by MALDI-TOF MS and API 20E as being K. pneumoniae were subject to whole-genome sequencing by Illumina technology, and the resultant assemblies were analysed via Kleborate. The 42 isolates were confirmed, based on Kleborate and Type Strain Genome Server analysis [Reference Meier-Kolthoff and Göker32] of their genome sequence, as being K. pneumoniae (Supplementary Table S1).

Antimicrobial sensitivity testing

All isolates were susceptible to ertapenem and enrofloxacin (Table 1). Of note were two ESBL-producing isolates, which showed multi-drug resistance to amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, streptomycin, tetracycline, cefotaxime, cephalexin, and cefquinome. Excluding the ESBL-producing isolates, there was a prevalence of streptomycin (26.2%) and tetracycline (19.0%) resistance, with a notable number of isolates showing intermediate susceptibility to cephalexin (26.2%) and neomycin (21.4%).

Table 1. Number and percentage of studied isolates which showed sensitive, intermediate, or resistant susceptibility profiles against the listed antimicrobial agents

Molecular characterisation of isolates

The 42 K. pneumoniae isolates originated from 28 dairy herd premises, 7 isolates came from the same farm, 4 from another farm, 2 from five other farms with the rest being single isolates from the remaining 21 premises. Their genome size varied from 5236065 to 5764556 Mb with a mean of 5454345 Mb (Supplementary Table S2). The G + C content ranged from 56.6 to 57.6 mol% with a mean of 57.2 mol% (Supplementary Table S2). The 42 isolates belonged to 31 different multi-locus sequence types (https://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/ ) each of which was represented by one or two isolates with the exception of seven ST107 isolates. One isolate (30881_C069646/2) belonged to a new sequence type – ST6855. The mean pairwise single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) distance between isolates was 9234 SNPs (range 0–10665) (Supplementary Table S2). There were seven pairs of identical/near-identical isolates (separated by 0–7 SNPs). In four of these cases, the two isolates came from different farms (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Mid-point rooted, neighbour-joining tree showing phylogenetic relationships among K. pneumoniae mastitis isolates from Scotland. Tree constructed using pairwise SNP distances across 1972 K. pneumoniae core genes and produced by Pathogenwatch [Reference Argimón, David and Underwood25]. Multiple isolates came from Farms B (7 isolates) and V (5 isolates), and these are highlighted in green and yellow, respectively. ST107 isolates are highlighted in a black box. The presence of yersiniabactin is denoted by red star and antimicrobial resistance genes are shown by squares as being either present (filled black square) or absent (empty square).

AMR determinants

Ten different acquired AMR genes were present among the 42 isolates with the aminoglycoside phosphotransferases strA/APH(3″)-Ib and strB/APH(Reference Zadoks, Griffiths and Munoz6)-Id being the most abundant (present in 12 isolates) (Figure 1). All but one isolate carried the chromosomally encoded SHV β-lactamase with eight different alleles being present. None of these alleles carry known class-modifying mutations, i.e. conferring resistance to extended-spectrum β-lactams or β-lactamase inhibitors [Reference Lam, Wick and Watts26]. Two isolates, 30837_C348868 and 30838_C349123, were ESBL producers and encoded CTX-M-15. Despite originating from the same premises (Supplementary Table S2), these isolates are phylogenetically unrelated based on core genome SNPs (Figure 1).

Virulence determinants

Isolates were examined for the presence of the virulence-related genes encoding acquired siderophores (yersiniabactin, salmochelin, aerobactin), the genotoxin colibactin, the hypermucoidy locus rmpADC, and alternative hypermucoidy marker gene rmpA2. These were absent from all isolates except for ybST (encoding yersiniabactin) which was present in six isolates, of which only two are closely related (Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S1).

Prevalence of ST107

The most common multi-locus sequence type was ST107, with seven isolates being detected from six farms. These were investigated further by phylogenetic comparison with all 92 ST107 isolate genomes available from Pathogenwatch (accessed 17/01/2023) (Supplementary Table S3). Metadata showed that these 92 isolates came from 17 countries and from the continents of Australia (2 isolates), Africa [Reference Petersson-Wolfe, Leslie and Swartz1], Asia [Reference Saini, McClure and Léger11], Europe [Reference Letunic and Bork27], North America [50], and South America [Reference Petersson-Wolfe, Leslie and Swartz1]. These isolates were from cattle (44 isolates), humans (44 isolates), chickens [Reference Petersson-Wolfe, Leslie and Swartz1], and unknown sources [Reference Klaas and Zadoks3]. The resultant tree (Figure 2) showed that isolates from this study did not all cluster together within the ST107 global population. While each isolate was always most closely related to another study isolate, they were all also closely related (10–19 SNPs) to three bovine isolates from North America (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Mid-point rooted, neighbour-joining tree showing phylogenetic relationships among international isolates K. pneumoniae ST107. Tree constructed using pairwise SNP distances across 1972 K. pneumoniae core genes and produced by Pathogenwatch [Reference Argimón, David and Underwood25]. Geographical location of origin and host are indicated by a coloured key. Labels of study isolates are shaded grey, and UK is differentiated from Europe for the purposes of this figure.

Discussion

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a well-studied pathogen in the context of human infection [Reference Gorrie, Mirčeta and Wick33, Reference Wyres, Lam and Holt34], but less research has been carried out on bovine mastitis isolates [Reference Zheng, Gorden and Xia35]. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic analysis of K. pneumoniae isolates causing sub-clinical and clinical mastitis in Scotland, focussing on comprehensive phenotypic identification, antimicrobial sensitivity, molecular characteristics, and population structure.

First, there was marked diversity in K. pneumoniae isolates by MLST, identifying 31 sequence types among the 42 strains. This finding has been mirrored in previous work, which also showed high diversity in K. pneumoniae genomes [Reference Zheng, Gorden and Xia35, Reference Yang, Xiong and Barkema36]. Klebsiella species are common inhabitants on the teat skin of dairy cattle [Reference Munoz, Bennett and Ahlström37]; thus, the sample collection method may have a part to play in the diversity of Klebsiella species found in milk samples [Reference Zadoks, Middleton and McDougall38] and could also be suggestive of an environmental source of infection [Reference Massé, Dufour and Archambault13]. Despite the heterogeneity, the same strains have been implicated in infections on the same units in this study, and in previous mastitis studies [Reference Munoz, Welcome and Schukken39, Reference Paulin-Curlee, Sreevatsan and Singer40], which may suggest a common source of infection.

Second, despite the diversity in this dataset by MLST, 7 of 42 isolates belonged to ST107. The frequency of the remaining STs was two or less, highlighting the diversity of K. pneumoniae strains on-farm. These ST107 strains were observed across six farms. These isolates were included in a meta-analysis with other ST107 strains globally, which appeared to be more related overall to other bovine isolates than other species. Indeed, other studies have found that ST107 is predominant [Reference Zheng, Gorden and Xia35, Reference Yang, Xiong and Barkema36, Reference Klaper, Hammerl and Rau41, Reference Cheng, Zhou and Nobrega42]. Other work has shown that ST107 are one of the most common strains associated with clinical mastitis [Reference Song, He and Yang43], which could potentially suggest lateral spread of the infection rather than being strictly environmental [Reference Schukken, Bennett and Zurakowski10]. This could be of clinical significance since it becomes more of a risk that infection could occur from other sources, such as milking equipment, increasing the likelihood of a herd-level infection rather than sporadic infection.

Third, virulence factors were considered using whole-genome sequencing data. The study isolates were examined for genes encoding yersiniabactin, salmochelin, aerobactin, colibactin, the hypermucoidy locus rmpADC and the alternative hypermucoidy marker gene rmpA2. Most of these virulence factors were not observed, except for ybST, which encodes yersiniabactin. This gene was found in six of the study isolates, from five different STs (ST37, ST458, ST111, ST1109 (n = 2), and ST976). Previous work has highlighted that many of the virulence genes mentioned previously are less common in bovine isolates in comparison to human isolates [Reference Song, He and Yang43Reference Ludden, Moradigaravand and Jamrozy45] and are associated with increased virulence. However, we do not have the data resolution as part of this study to determine the role of yersiniabactin in virulence.

Fourth, the AMR phenotypes were well predicted by known AMR genes. Ten different acquired AMR genes were observed across the dataset, with the aminoglycoside phosphotransferases strA/APH(3″)-Ib and strB/APH(Reference Zadoks, Griffiths and Munoz6)-Id being the most prevalent (present in 28.6% of isolates). Indeed, 26.2% of the study isolates showed phenotypic resistance to streptomycin and 21.4% showed intermediate sensitivity to neomycin (both aminoglycoside antibiotics). Phenotypic resistance to tetracycline was also prevalent (19% of isolates), with tetA being observed in 4.8% of isolates, and both tetB and tetR genes being observed in pairs across 14.3% of isolates. Intermediate sensitivity to cephalexin was observed in over a quarter of isolates (26.2%), and all bar one isolates carried the chromosomally encoded SHV β-lactamase, showing eight different alleles. None of the eight alleles carry known class-modifying mutations linked to resistance to extended-spectrum β-lactams or β-lactamase inhibitors.

Finally, linked to the above, we identified two suspected ESBL-producing isolates from the same premises (encoding CTX-M-15) in this dataset by whole-genome sequencing, which was confirmed phenotypically. These isolates showed multi-drug resistance to amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, streptomycin, tetracycline, cefotaxime, cephalexin, and cefquinome. Critically, no study isolates showed carbapenemase activity, but there has been a series of recent work reporting carbapenem resistance in bovine mastitis isolates [Reference Silva-Sanchez, Barrios-Camacho and Hernández-Rodriguez18, Reference He, Wang, Sun and Pang19, Reference Saddam, Jamal and Rahman46, Reference Bonardi, Cabassi and Fiaccadori47], highlighting the importance of disease and AMR surveillance work.

Conclusions

To conclude, the genetic diversity in the described K. pneumoniae isolates is high with the most dominant ST107 potentially linked to lateral spread. The number of well-described virulence genes present was low, with ybST (encoding yersiniabactin) being observed in a small number of isolates. Higher levels of AMR to aminoglycosides and tetracycline were present, with two ESBL-producing isolates being observed. This study highlights the importance of monitoring bacterial isolates in clinical cases considering concerns about multi-drug resistance. This work should inform more extensive future studies including a larger number of farm units over a period of time.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268824001754.

Data availability

Whole-genome sequence data are available on Genbank (BioProject PRJNA943144, accession numbers and genome descriptive statistics are provided in Supplementary Table S3).

Acknowledgements

We thank the Institut Pasteur teams for the curation and maintenance of BIGSdb-Pasteur databases at https://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/.

Author contribution

Conceptualization: G.P., M.R.H., J.B., K.H., J.P.; Data curation: G.P., G.F., J.B., K.H., J.P.; Formal analysis: G.P.; Investigation: G.P., G.F., K.H., J.P.; Methodology: G.P., G.F., J.B., K.H., J.P.; Resources: G.P., M.R.H., J.P.; Software: G.P.; Supervision: G.P., M.R.H., G.F., J.P.; Visualization: G.P., J.P.; Writing – original draft: G.P., M.R.H., G.F., J.B., K.H., J.P.; Writing – review & editing: G.P., M.R.H., G.F., J.B., K.H., J.P.; Funding acquisition: M.R.H., J.P.; Project administration: M.R.H., J.P.

Competing interest

The authors declare none.

Funding statement

The whole-genome sequencing was funded by the Hannah Dairy Research Foundation, as part of the HDRF Small Grant Scheme (Principal Investigator: JP). MRH receives funding from the Scottish Government. JP, JB, and GF receive funding as part of the Scottish Government Disease Surveillance Programme.

References

Petersson-Wolfe, CS, Leslie, KE and Swartz, TH (2018) An update on the effect of clinical mastitis on the welfare of dairy cows and potential therapies. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice 34, 525535.Google ScholarPubMed
Pollock, J, Salter, SJ, Nixon, R et al. (2021) Milk microbiome in dairy cattle and the challenges of low microbial biomass and exogenous contamination. Animal Microbiome 3, 80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klaas, IC and Zadoks, RN (2018) An update on environmental mastitis: Challenging perceptions. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 65, 166185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fu, S, Wen, C, Wang, Z et al. 2022 Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of outbreaks of Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical mastitis in Chinese dairy farms. Microbiology Spectrum 10, e0299722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, L, Hulland, C and Ruegg, PL (2013) Characterization of clinical mastitis occurring in cows on 50 large dairy herds in Wisconsin. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 75387549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zadoks, RN, Griffiths, HM, Munoz, MA et al.(2011) Sources of Klebsiella and Raoultella species on dairy farms: Be careful where you walk. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 10451051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gröhn, YT, Wilson, DJ, González, RN et al. (2004) Effect of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 33583374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schukken, Y, Chuff, M, Moroni, P et al. (2012) The “other” gram-negative bacteria in mastitis: Klebsiella, Serratia and more. Veterinary Clinics of North America – Food Animal Practice 28, 239256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuenzalida, MJ and Ruegg, PL (2019) Negatively controlled, randomized clinical trial to evaluate intramammary treatment of nonsevere, gram-negative clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 54385457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schukken, YH, Bennett, GJ, Zurakowski, MJ et al. (2011) Randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 5-day ceftiofur hydrochloride intramammary treatment on non severe gram-negative clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 62036215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saini, V, McClure, JT, Léger, D et al. (2012) Antimicrobial resistance profiles of common mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 43194332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Jong, A, Garch, FE, Simjee, S et al. (2018) Monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility of udder pathogens recovered from cases of clinical mastitis in dairy cows across Europe: VetPath results. Veterinary Microbiology 213, 7381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massé, J, Dufour, S and Archambault, M (2020) Characterization of Klebsiella isolates obtained from clinical mastitis cases in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 103, 33923400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koovapra, S, Bandyopadhyay, S, Das, G et al. (2016) Molecular signature of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from bovine milk in eastern and north-eastern India. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 44, 395402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locatelli, C, Scaccabarozzi, L, Pisoni, G et al. (2010) CTX-M1 ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae subsp. pneumoniae isolated from cases of bovine mastitis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 48, 38223823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saishu, N, Ozaki, H and Murase, T (2014) CTX-M-type extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from cases of bovine mastitis in Japan. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 76, 11531156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timofte, D, Maciuc, IE, Evans, NJ et al. (2014) Detection and molecular characterization of Escherichia coli CTX-M-15 and Klebsiella pneumoniae SHV-12 β-lactamases from bovine mastitis isolates in the United Kingdom. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 58, 789794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva-Sanchez, J, Barrios-Camacho, H, Hernández-Rodriguez, E et al. (2021) Molecular characterization of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 isolated from bovine mastitis. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 52, 10291036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, T, Wang, Y, Sun, L, Pang, M et al. (2017) Occurrence and characterization of blaNDM-5-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from dairy cows in Jiangsu, China. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 72, 9094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, G, Robb, A and Paterson, GK (2020) Isolation and genome sequencing of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans from Antarctic and North Sea seals. Access Microbiology 2, 10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolger, AM, Lohse, M and Usadel, B (2014) Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 21142120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bankevich, A, Nurk, S, Antipov, D et al. (2012) SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. Journal of Computational Biology 19, 455477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seemann, T (2014) Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 20682069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astashyn, A, Tvedte, ES, Sweeney, D et al. (2023) Rapid and sensitive detection of genome contamination at scale with FCS-GX. bioRxiv 2023; 2023.06.02.543519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argimón, S, David, S, Underwood, A et al. (2021) Rapid genomic characterization and global surveillance of klebsiella using Pathogenwatch. Clinical Infectious Diseases 73, S325S335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, MMC, Wick, RR, Watts, SC et al. (2021) A genomic surveillance framework and genotyping tool for Klebsiella pneumoniae and its related species complex. Nature Communications 12.Google ScholarPubMed
Letunic, I and Bork, P (2016) Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: An online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Research 44, W242W245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Letunic, I and Bork, P (2019) Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Research 47, 256259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EUCAST (2023) The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 130.Google Scholar
CLSI, Pennsylvania, United States (2023) CLSI Vet 01S: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, 6th Edn.Google Scholar
CASFM, Paris, France (2023) Comité de l’antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie.Google Scholar
Meier-Kolthoff, JP and Göker, M (2019) TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nature Communications 10, 2182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorrie, CL, Mirčeta, M, Wick, RR et al. (2022) Genomic dissection of Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in hospital patients reveals insights into an opportunistic pathogen. Nature Communications 13, 3017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyres, KL, Lam, MMC and Holt, KE (2020) Population genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nature Reviews Microbiology 18, 344359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, Z, Gorden, PJ, Xia, X et al. (2022) Whole-genome analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae from bovine mastitis milk in the U.S. Environmental Microbiology 24, 11831199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J, Xiong, Y, Barkema, HW et al. (2023) Comparative genomic analyses of Klebsiella pneumoniae K57 capsule serotypes isolated from bovine mastitis in China. Journal of Dairy Science 5, 31143126.Google Scholar
Munoz, MA, Bennett, GJ, Ahlström, C et al. (2008) Cleanliness scores as indicator of klebsiella exposure in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 39083916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zadoks, RN, Middleton, JR, McDougall, S et al. (2011) Molecular epidemiology of mastitis pathogens of dairy cattle and comparative relevance to humans. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 16, 357372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munoz, MA, Welcome, FL, Schukken, YH et al. (2007) Molecular epidemiology of two Klebsiella pneumoniae mastitis outbreaks on a dairy farm in New York State. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 45, 39643971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulin-Curlee, GG, Sreevatsan, S, Singer, RS et al. (2008) Molecular subtyping of mastitis-associated Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates shows high levels of diversity within and between dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 554563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klaper, K, Hammerl, JA, Rau, J et al. (2021) Genome-based analysis of klebsiella spp. isolates from animals and food products in Germany, 2013–2017. Pathogens 10, 20132017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, J, Zhou, M, Nobrega, DB et al. (2021) Genetic diversity and molecular epidemiology of outbreaks of Klebsiella pneumoniae mastitis on two large Chinese dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science 104, 762775.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, S, He, W, Yang, D et al. (2022) Molecular epidemiology of Klebsiella pneumoniae from clinical bovine mastitis in northern area of China, 2018–2019. Engineering 10, 146154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y, Higgins, CH, Rehman, I et al. (2019) Genomic diversity, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains from cows and humans. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 85, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludden, C, Moradigaravand, D, Jamrozy, D et al. (2020) A one health study of the genetic relatedness of Klebsiella pneumoniae and their mobile elements in the east of England. Clinical Infectious Diseases 70, 219226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saddam, KM, Jamal, M, Rahman, SU et al. (2023) Nutritional analysis and characterization of carbapenemase producing-Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant genes associated with bovine mastitis infected cow’s milk. PLoS One 18, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonardi, S, Cabassi, CS, Fiaccadori, E et al. (2023) Detection of carbapenemase- and ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae from bovine bulk milk and comparison with clinical human isolates in Italy. International Journal of Food Microbiology 387, 110049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Number and percentage of studied isolates which showed sensitive, intermediate, or resistant susceptibility profiles against the listed antimicrobial agents

Figure 1

Figure 1. Mid-point rooted, neighbour-joining tree showing phylogenetic relationships among K. pneumoniae mastitis isolates from Scotland. Tree constructed using pairwise SNP distances across 1972 K. pneumoniae core genes and produced by Pathogenwatch [25]. Multiple isolates came from Farms B (7 isolates) and V (5 isolates), and these are highlighted in green and yellow, respectively. ST107 isolates are highlighted in a black box. The presence of yersiniabactin is denoted by red star and antimicrobial resistance genes are shown by squares as being either present (filled black square) or absent (empty square).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Mid-point rooted, neighbour-joining tree showing phylogenetic relationships among international isolates K. pneumoniae ST107. Tree constructed using pairwise SNP distances across 1972 K. pneumoniae core genes and produced by Pathogenwatch [25]. Geographical location of origin and host are indicated by a coloured key. Labels of study isolates are shaded grey, and UK is differentiated from Europe for the purposes of this figure.

Supplementary material: File

Pollock et al. supplementary material 1

Pollock et al. supplementary material
Download Pollock et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 27 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pollock et al. supplementary material 2

Pollock et al. supplementary material
Download Pollock et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 33.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Pollock et al. supplementary material 3

Pollock et al. supplementary material
Download Pollock et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 27.6 KB