Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T19:56:52.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Divisive language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2024

Moira R. Dillon Open the ORCID record for Moira R. Dillon [Opens in a new window]
Moira R. Dillon*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA
*
Corresponding author: Moira R. Dillon; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What language devises, it might divide. By exploring the relations among the core geometries of the physical world, the abstract geometry of Euclid, and language, I give new insight into both the persistence of core knowledge into adulthood and our access to it through language. My extension of Spelke's language argument has implications for pedagogy, philosophy, and artificial intelligence.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e124
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayzenberg, V., & Lourenco, S. (2022). Perception of an object's global shape is best described by a model of skeletal structure inhuman infants. eLife, 11, e74943. doi:10.7554/eLife.74943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayzenberg, V., & Lourenco, S. F. (2019). Skeletal descriptions of shape provide unique perceptual information for object recognition. Scientific Reports, 9, 1–12. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45268-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., Seely, T. D., Berwick, R. C., Fong, S., Huybregts, M. A. C., Kitahara, H., … Sugimoto, Y. (2023). Merge and the strong minimalist thesis. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, M. R., Kannan, H., Dean, J. T., Spelke, E. S., & Duflo, E. (2017). Cognitive science in the field: A preschool intervention durably enhances intuitive but not formal mathematics. Science (New York, N.Y.), 357, 47–55. doi: http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doeller, C. F., & Burgess, N. (2008). Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 5909–5914. doi: http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711433105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doeller, C. F., King, J. A., & Burgess, N. (2008). Parallel striatal and hippocampal systems for landmarks and boundaries in spatial memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 5915–5920. doi: http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801489105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2014). “Please tap the shape, anywhere you like” shape skeletons in human vision revealed by an exceedingly simple measure. Psychological Science, 25, 377–386. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613507CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, H. M., Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science (New York, N.Y.), 315, 619. doi: http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hespos, S. J., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Conceptual precursors to language. Nature, 430, 453–456. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/nature02634CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (Carr, D., Trans.). Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1954).Google Scholar
Izard, V., Pica, P., Spelke, E. S., & Dehaene, S. (2011). Flexible intuitions of Euclidean geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 9782–9787. doi: http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016686108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (Guyer, P. & Wood, A. W., Trans. and Eds.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knobe, J., & Prinz, J. (2008). Intuitions about consciousness: Experimental studies. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 7(1), 67–83. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-007-9066-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y., & Dillon, M. R. (2023). We are wanderers: Abstract geometry reflects spatial navigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi:10.1037/xge0001504Google ScholarPubMed
McClelland, J. L. (2022). Capturing advanced human cognitive abilities with deep neural networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26, 1047–1050. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reilly, B. J. (2019). Getting the blues: Vision and cognition in the middle ages. Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sablé-Meyer, M., Ellis, K., Tenenbaum, J., & Dehaene, S. (2022). A language of thought for the mental representation of geometric shapes. Cognitive Psychology, 139, 101527. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101527CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spelke, E. S. (2022). What babies know: Core knowledge and composition. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, B. (2017). Language reflects “core” cognition: A new theory about the origin of cross-linguistic regularities. Cognitive Science, 41, 70–101. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12332CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F. (2002). The role of language in acquiring object kind concepts in infancy. Cognition, 85, 223–250. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00109-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants' metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111–153. doi: http://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed