Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-sl7kg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-20T09:05:53.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptual (roots of) core knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2024

Brian J. Scholl Open the ORCID record for Brian J. Scholl [Opens in a new window]
Brian J. Scholl*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA [email protected] https://perception.yale.edu/
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some core knowledge may be rooted in – or even identical to – well-characterized mechanisms of mid-level visual perception and attention. In the decades since it was first proposed, this possibility has inspired (and has been supported by) several discoveries in both infant cognition and adult perception, but it also faces several challenges. To what degree does What Babies Know reflect how babies see and attend?

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e140
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bai, D. (2023). Intuitive physics in visual perception. PhD dissertation, l'Ecole Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar
Battaglia, P. W., Hamrick, J. B., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2013). Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 18327–18332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, S., & Xu, F. (2001). Infants knowledge of objects: Beyond object-files and object tracking. Cognition, 80, 179–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y.-C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). The perception of history: Seeing causal history in static shapes induces illusory motion perception. Psychological Science, 27, 923–930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheries, E. W., Mitroff, S. R., Wynn, K., & Scholl, B. J. (2008). Cohesion as a constraint on object persistence in infancy. Developmental Science, 11, 427–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheries, E. W., Mitroff, S. R., Wynn, K., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Do the same principles constrain persisting object representations in infant cognition and adult perception?: The cases of continuity and cohesion. In Hood, B. & Santos, L. (Eds.), The origins of object knowledge (pp. 107–134). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Freitas, J., & Alvarez, G. (2018). Your visual system provides all the information you need to make moral judgments about generic visual events. Cognition, 178, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewar, K., & Xu, F. (2007). Do 9-month-old infants expect distinct words to refer to kinds? Developmental Psychology, 43, 1227–1238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39(E229), 1–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, T., McCarthy, G., & Scholl, B. J. (2010). The wolfpack effect: Perception of animacy irresistibly influences interactive behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 1845–1853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, T., Newman, G. E., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 154–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, T., & Scholl, B. J. (2011). Chasing vs. stalking: Interrupting the perception of animacy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 37, 669–684.Google ScholarPubMed
Gergeley, G., Nadasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Biro, S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, E. J., & Wang, S.-h. (2019). Comparison facilitates the use of height information by 5-month-olds in containment events. Developmental Psychology, 55, 2475–2482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450, 557–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hespos, S. J., & Baillargeon, R. (2001). Infants’ knowledge about occlusion and containment events: A surprising discrepancy. Psychological Science, 12, 141–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntley-Fenner, G., Carey, S., & Solimando, A. (2002). Objects are individuals but stuff doesn't count: Perceived rigidity and cohesiveness influence infants’ representations of small numbers of discrete entities. Cognition, 85, 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. M., Xu, F., Tremoulet, P., & Scholl, B. J. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: Developing “what” and “where” systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitroff, S. R., Scholl, B. J., & Wynn, K. (2004). Divide and conquer: How object files adapt when a persisting object splits into two. Psychological Science, 15, 420–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakayama, K., He, Z. J., & Shimojo, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In Kosslyn, S. (Ed.), Visual cognition (pp. 1–70). Volume 2 of An Invitation to Cognitive Science, 2nd ed. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noles, N. S., Scholl, B. J., & Mitroff, S. R. (2005). The persistence of object file representations. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 324–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ongchoco, J. D. K., Wong, K., & Scholl, B. J. (2023). The “unfinishedness” of dynamic events is spontaneously extracted in visual processing: A new “Visual Zeigarnik Effect”. Journal of Vision, 23, 4974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scholl, B. J. (2007). Object persistence in philosophy and psychology. Mind & Language, 22, 563–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholl, B. J., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Explaining the infant's object concept: Beyond the perception/cognition dichotomy. In Lepore, E. & Pylyshyn, Z. (Eds.), What is cognitive science? (pp. 26–73). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Southgate, V., & Csibra, G. (2009). Inferring the outcome of an ongoing novel action at 13 months. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1794–1798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spelke, E. (1988). Where perceiving ends and thinking begins: The apprehension of objects in infancy. In Yonas, A. (Ed.), Perceptual development in infancy (pp. 197–234). Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. (2022). What babies know. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E., & Van de Walle, G. (1993). Perceiving and reasoning about objects: Insights from infants. In Eilan, N., McCarthy, R. & Brewer, W. (Eds.), Spatial representation (pp. 132–161). Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Strickland, B., & Scholl, B. J. (2015). Visual perception involves “event type” representations: The case of containment vs. occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 570–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., & Chun, M. M. (2008). Babies and brains: Habituation in infant cognition and functional neuroimaging. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2, Article 16.Google ScholarPubMed
Ullman, T. D., Spelke, E. S., Battaglia, P., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2017). Mind games: Game engines as an architecture for intuitive physics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 649–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Buren, B., Uddenberg, S., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). The automaticity of perceiving animacy: Goal-directed motion in simple shapes influences visuomotor behavior even when task-irrelevant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 797–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
vanMarle, K., & Scholl, B. J. (2003). Attentive tracking of objects versus substances. Psychological Science, 14, 498–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, S., Baillargeon, R., & Brueckner, L. (2004). Young infants’ reasoning about hidden objects: Evidence from violation-of-expectation tasks with test trials only. Cognition, 93, 167–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, K. W., Bi, W., Soltani, A., Yildirim, I., & Scholl, B. J. (2023). Seeing soft materials draped over objects: A case study of intuitive physics in perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Science, 34, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F. (2002). The role of language in acquiring object kind concepts in infancy. Cognition, 85, 223–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed