Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:35:42.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trends in dietary carbohydrate quality during puberty from 1988 to 2007: a cause for concern?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2010

Guo Cheng*
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Dortmund, Germany
Lars Libuda
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Dortmund, Germany
Nadina Karaolis-Danckert
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Dortmund, Germany
Ute Alexy
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Dortmund, Germany
Katja Bolzenius
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Dortmund, Germany
Thomas Remer
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Dortmund, Germany
Anette E. Buyken
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Child Nutrition, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Dortmund, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: G. Cheng, fax +49 231 71 15 81, email [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The extent to which the quality of dietary carbohydrates (CHO) changes throughout puberty is not known. We analysed trends in the quantity and quality of CHO intake among German adolescents by separately examining trends during puberty (pubertal trends) and trends in CHO intake from 1988 to 2007 (secular trends). Linear mixed-effects regression analyses were performed in 216 participants of the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study who had provided weighed 3 d dietary records at the onset of the pubertal growth spurt (defined by age at take-off) and over the subsequent 4 years. Over the course of puberty, CHO quality changed little: added sugar intake from beverages increased in girls (0·25 (se 0·12) % energy (% E)/year, P = 0·04) and added sugar intake from sweets decreased in both sexes (boys: − 0·22 (se 0·11) % E/year, P = 0·049; girls: − 0·20 (se 0·10) % E/year, P = 0·04). For both sexes, significant upward secular trends were observed for CHO (% E), glycaemic load (g/MJ) and added sugar intakes from sources other than sweets and soft drinks (% E), while absolute fibre intake (g/d) decreased (P ≤ 0·04). Concomitant increases in total added sugar intake (% E) and decreases in fibre and whole-grain densities (g/MJ) (P = 0·001–0·02) were confined to boys only. The quality of dietary CHO consumed by healthy German adolescents shows notable secular declines, but does not change markedly during puberty. Public health initiatives should be tailored to improve the overall quality of CHO nutrition.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Recent studies indicate notable changes in dietary quality from childhood to adolescence. Consumption of fruits and vegetables has been found to decrease(Reference Lytle, Seifert and Greenstein1), whereas the consumption of soft drinks increased(Reference Lytle, Seifert and Greenstein1). Furthermore, as children age, they increase their fast food consumption(Reference St-Onge, Keller and Heymsfield2), which in turn has been found to be associated with lower intakes of fruits, vegetables and grains, and with higher sugar intakes(Reference French, Story and Neumark-Sztainer3). It is thus intriguing to consider that carbohydrate (CHO) quality in particular declines as puberty commences, but this has not been investigated to date.

In addition, concern has been expressed that recent increases in relative CHO intake among European and North American children and adolescents(Reference Alexy, Sichert-Hellert and Kersting4, Reference Nicklas, Elkasabany and Srinivasan5) may have been accompanied by a secular decline in CHO quality. In fact, prospective studies indicate that increases in CHO intake were mostly due to a higher consumption of pastries/cakes and sweets without an accompanying increase in fibre intakes(Reference Alexy, Kersting and Sichert-Hellert6, Reference Joyce and Gibney7).

Considering that puberty may represent the so-called ‘critical period’ for the development of overweight(Reference Dietz8), it is important to disentangle pubertal and secular trends in the quality of CHO intake in order to develop preventive strategies specifically targeted at adolescents. Preferably, such investigations should take pubertal stage into account, since individual changes in food intake may to some extent reflect adaptations to changes in physiological requirements during puberty.

Using data obtained from the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed (DONALD) Study, the objective of the present analysis was to analyse individual changes in CHO quality – characterised by glycaemic index (GI), glycaemic load (GL), and fibre, whole-grain and added sugar intakes – during puberty (between puberty onset and the subsequent 4 years) (pubertal trend), and to separate this trend from changes in CHO quality which may have occurred between 1988 and 2007 (secular trend) in German adolescents.

Materials and methods

Study sample

The DONALD Study is an ongoing, open cohort study that was started in 1985 in Dortmund, Germany. Details have been described elsewhere(Reference Kroke, Manz and Kersting9). The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Bonn, and all examinations were performed with parental consent.

For the purpose of the present analysis, changes in dietary CHO quality during physiologically defined puberty were of interest. Chronological age may be confounded by children of the same age differing considerably in their pubertal stage. Defining puberty based on visual observation according to Tanner stage has been criticised as being subjective with considerable inter-observer variability(Reference Euling, Herman-Giddens and Lee10), and is commonly perceived as intrusive by healthy individuals(Reference Mirwald, Baxter-Jones and Bailey11). Conversely, puberty can be more objectively determined from serial height measurements, an approach chosen in several longitudinal studies(Reference Silventoinen, Haukka and Dunkel12Reference He and Karlberg14). We thus defined puberty onset as the age at take-off (ATO), i.e. the beginning of the pubertal growth spurt.

In total, ATO could be reliably estimated for 376 subjects. Of these, 216 adolescents who had complete anthropometric and nutritional data around ATO and information on potential confounders were included in the present analysis. Plausible checks according to the age- and sex-specific cut-off points(Reference Sichert-Hellert, Kersting and Schoch15) revealed implausible energy intake in 88 of the 1053 dietary records. Since the energy intakes of these eighty-eight dietary records ranged between 3347·2 kJ (800 kcal) and 9414 kJ (2250 kcal), we retained all records so as to base our intra-individual trend analyses on as many repeatedly collected diaries as possible. Due to the open cohort design of the DONALD Study, participants reached ATO between 1988 and 2003, and all of them attained their peak height velocity within 4 years of puberty onset, i.e. all our subjects reached an advanced stage of puberty within the present study period.

Anthropometry and assessment of puberty onset

Anthropometric measurements are performed at each visit by nurses who have been trained according to standard procedures(Reference Lohman, Roche and Martorell16), with the children dressed in underwear only and barefoot. From the age of 2 years onwards, standing height is measured to the nearest 0·1 cm using a digital stadiometer (Harpenden, Crymych, UK).

ATO was estimated using the parametric Preece & Baines model 1(Reference Preece and Baines17), based on height measurements from the age of 6 years onwards in boys and on height measurements from the age of 5 years onwards in girls(Reference Buyken, Karaolis-Danckert and Remer18). The mean ATO in our sample of 10·3 (sd 0·9) years for boys and 8·7 (sd 0·9) years for girls was in line with mean ATO values reported from other contemporary studies conducted among American and European children(Reference Silventoinen, Haukka and Dunkel12, Reference Berkey, Dockery and Wang19Reference Aksglaede, Olsen and Sorensen21).

Nutrition assessment

Food consumption in the DONALD Study is assessed using 3 d weighed dietary records(Reference Kroke, Manz and Kersting9). For the present analysis, each CHO-containing food recorded in the dietary record was assigned a GI. Foods were assigned either (1) a published GI(22); (2) the GI of a close match or (3) the GI calculated from the GI values of the foods' ingredients using recipes available in the in-house database Lebensmitteltabelle (LEBTAB)(Reference Sichert-Hellert, Kersting and Chahda23). Foods containing mainly fat or protein with a CHO content below 5 g/100 g were assigned a GI of 0 (for example, cold meats)(Reference Buyken, Dettmann and Kersting24).

Dietary fibre content was calculated using the LEBTAB database. Whole-grain intake was estimated by assigning whole-grain content in grams to each CHO-containing food recorded in the dietary records using the respective recipes and ingredient information available at the time of recording. In the present analysis, we revised the definition of whole grain used in a previous analysis(Reference Cheng, Karaolis-Danckert and Libuda25) to only include cereal grains, which contain the same relative proportions of bran, germ and endosperm as they exist in the intact caryopsis(26).

Added sugar intake was defined as described previously(Reference Buyken, Cheng and Gunther27). Since an increased soft drink consumption during adolescence(Reference St-Onge, Keller and Heymsfield2, Reference Lytle and Kubik28) is thought to place children at risk of excess weight gain(Reference Ludwig, Peterson and Gortmaker29), three subgroups of added sugar intakes were also examined: added sugar from beverages (i.e. from regular soft drinks and fruit juices), added sugar from sweets (i.e. from candy, chocolate, jam and ice cream) and added sugar from other sources (i.e. the remainder of food sources, e.g. breakfast cereals, pastries, milk and milk products).

The GL in the present study correlated with CHO intake (r 0·97 and 0·96 in boys and girls, respectively), GI (r 0·38 and 0·32 in boys and girls, respectively) and added sugar intake (r 0·71 and 0·69 in boys and girls, respectively). We did not assess the validity of the recorded CHO intakes, since validation of weighed dietary records – commonly considered to be the ‘gold standard’ method among dietary assessment methods(Reference Bingham, Cassidy and Cole30) – requires the use of a widely accepted recovery biomarker, which presently does not exist for CHO intake. However, a recent analysis among DONALD participants has shown an acceptable validity of protein intake data compared with 24 h urinary nitrogen excretion in a large sample of both children and adolescents(Reference Bokhof, Gunther and Berg-Beckhoff31).

Statistical analysis

To obtain the mean daily GI and GL values of each subject, we firstly multiplied the CHO content (in g) of each food consumed by the food's assigned GI. The sum of these GL values of each food corresponds to the total GL. The total GI was obtained by dividing the total GL by the total CHO intake. The mean daily added sugar, fibre or whole-grain intake was the sum of the added sugar, fibre or whole-grain content of each food consumed on each day.

SAS® procedures (version 9.1.3; SAS, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) were used for data analysis. Analyses indicated interactions between sex and changes in CHO quality during puberty (P value for interaction < 0·1). Thus, data obtained from girls and boys were analysed separately. A P value < 0·05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

As suggested by Jacobs et al. (Reference Jacobs, Hannan and Wallace32), repeated-measures regression models (PROC MIXED), including both fixed and random effects, were used to construct longitudinal models of trends in CHO quality partitioned into pubertal trends and secular trends. The pubertal trend in our models was estimated from the pubertal age coefficient, and the time coefficient represented the secular trend. Separate models for each CHO variable (the dependent variable) regressed the respective dietary measurement at each examination on pubertal age at examination (ATO was considered the baseline pubertal age, i.e. pubertal age = 0) and the year of examination (first calendar year of the DONALD Study was considered the baseline time, i.e. time = 0).

A repeated statement was used to account for the lack of independence that exists between repeated observations on the same person, and a family variable was used as a random effect. In the unadjusted model, pubertal age and time were the principal fixed effects. In the adjusted model, we included BMI standard deviation scores at ATO (to control for potential confounding due to a relation between CHO quality and BMI standard deviation scores at ATO(Reference Cheng, Karaolis-Danckert and Libuda25)), maternal overweight and maternal education (to account for potential confounding by an association between socio-economic status and dietary choices(Reference Hulshof, Brussaard and Kruizinga33)).

Results

Study sample characteristics at ATO by calendar year strata are presented in Table 1. Between 1988 and 1997, ATO occurred at the age of 10·2 years in boys and 8·6 years in girls, and between 1998 and 2003 at the age of 10·3 years in boys and 8·8 years in girls.

Table 1 Characteristics* at age at take-off (ATO) for 100 boys and 116 girls from the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study by calendar year strata

(Mean values and standard deviations, medians (first quartile (Q1) and third quartile (Q3)) or frequencies and percentages)

PHV, peak height velocity; SDS, standard deviation scores.

* P for trend was tested using ANOVA for normally distributed continuous variables, Kruskal–Wallis test for not normally distributed continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables.

Calculated according to Slaughter et al. (Reference Slaughter, Lohman and Boileau49).

Derived from the age- and sex-specific cut-off points proposed by the International Obesity Task Force, which are linked to the adult cut-off point of BMI of 25 kg/m2(Reference Cole, Bellizzi and Flegal50).

§ BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2.

School education for at least 12 years.

Table 2 summarises mean nutritional intakes of boys stratified by pubertal age and time. Since energy intakes increased notably throughout puberty, the absolute intakes of all measures describing CHO intake also increased during puberty apart from the intakes of whole grain and added sugar from sweets (first set of columns). With respect to relative measures of CHO intake, GL and the percentage of energy from other sources increased throughout puberty, while energy from added sugar from sweets decreased. We also observed a significant secular increase in energy intake, and absolute intakes of all CHO quality measures increased, except for the intakes of whole grain, fibre and added sugar from sweets (second set of columns). With respect to relative intakes, we found secular increases in GL and energy from total added sugar and added sugar from other sources and CHO, and secular decreases in whole-grain and fibre intake densities.

Table 2 Dietary characteristics* of boys (n 100, in total 486 dietary records) from the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study sample during the study period

(Mean values and standard deviations)

ATO, age at take-off; GL, glycaemic load; GI, glycaemic index; % E, % energy.

* All nutritional data represent crude values.

Dietary records at 1 year after ATO and 3 years after ATO were not considered in the table, but all dietary records (n 486) were used for P for trend.

P for trend was tested using PROC GLM.

§ Sugar from other sources: the difference between the total added sugar and added sugar from beverages and sweets.

GI was calculated using the glucose = 100 scale.

Intakes of added sugar or carbohydrate (g/MJ) (% E) = 1·67.

Similarly, energy intake in girls (Table 3) also increased throughout puberty, resulting in increases of all measures describing absolute CHO intake except for the intakes of whole grain and added sugar from beverages and from sweets (first set of columns). Relative CHO intakes did not change during puberty. Secular increases were observed for GL and absolute intakes of added sugar from sweets and from other sources (second set of columns). Concurrently, absolute fibre intakes decreased, and absolute whole-grain intakes tended to decrease. With respect to relative measures of CHO intake, GI, GL and intakes of added sugar from other sources and CHO showed secular increases, while intakes of fibre and added sugar from sweets decreased.

Table 3 Dietary characteristics* of girls (n 116, in total 567 dietary records) from the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study sample during the study period

(Mean values and standard deviations)

ATO, age at take-off; GL, glycaemic load; GI, glycaemic index; % E, % energy.

* All nutritional data represent crude values.

Dietary records at 1 year after ATO and 3 years after ATO were not considered in the table, but all dietary records (n 567) were used for P for trend.

P for trend was tested using PROC GLM.

§ Sugar from other sources: the difference between the total added sugar and added sugar from beverages and sweets.

GI was calculated using the glucose = 100 scale.

Intakes of added sugar or carbohydrate (g/MJ) (% E) = 1·67.

Repeated-measures analysis confirmed upward pubertal trends in the absolute intakes of all CHO intake variables, except for added sugar from beverages in boys and whole grain and added sugar from sweets in both sexes (Table 4, first set of columns). With respect to secular trends in absolute intakes, in both sexes, fibre intake decreased and added sugar from other sources increased between 1988 and 2007 (Table 4, second set of columns). In boys, the absolute whole-grain intake decreased, and added sugar intake increased over time.

Table 4 Pubertal and secular trends* (per year) in carbohydrate quality (absolute intake) in 216 participants from the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study analysed by repeated-measures regression analysis

(β coefficients with their standard errors)

GL, glycaemic load; ATO, age at take-off; SDS, standard deviation scores.

* Pubertal trend, directly from ATO and over the subsequent 4 years; secular trend, from year 1988 to year 2007.

BMI SDS at ATO, maternal education and maternal overweight were included in the adjusted model, since they significantly affected the pubertal and secular trends of the carbohydrate quality in the basic models. Models of fibre intake and whole-grain intake were adjusted additionally for BMI SDS at ATO, maternal education and maternal overweight; models of total added sugar and its subgroups, dietary GL and carbohydrate intake were adjusted additionally for BMI SDS at ATO; energy model was adjusted additionally for BMI SDS at ATO and maternal overweight.

The only pubertal trends for relative CHO intakes were an increase in added sugar intake from beverages in girls and a decrease in added sugar intake from sweets in both sexes (Table 5, first set of columns). With respect to secular trends, the relative intakes of CHO, GL and added sugar from other sources increased over time (Table 5, second set of columns). Downward secular trends in fibre and whole-grain intake densities and upward secular trends in total added sugar were only observed in boys.

Table 5 Pubertal and secular trends* (per year) in carbohydrate quality (relative intake) in 216 participants from the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study analysed by repeated-measures regression analysis

(β coefficients with their standard errors)

GI, glycaemic index; GL, glycaemic load; % E, % energy; ATO, age at take-off; SDS, standard deviation scores.

* Pubertal trend, directly from ATO and over the subsequent 4 years; secular trend, from year 1988 to year 2007.

BMI SDS at ATO, maternal education and maternal overweight were included in the adjusted model, since they significantly affected the pubertal and secular trends of the carbohydrate quality in the basic models. Models of dietary GI and intakes of fibre and whole grain were adjusted additionally for BMI SDS at ATO, maternal education and maternal overweight; models of total added sugar and its subgroups, dietary GL and carbohydrate intake were adjusted additionally for BMI SDS at ATO.

Intakes of added sugar or carbohydrate (g/MJ) (% E) = 1·67.

Discussion

The present study suggests that in the population of healthy adolescents, the CHO quality did not change considerably over the course of puberty. However, CHO quality declined over the last 20 years, i.e. absolute fibre intake decreased and the contribution of added sugar from sources other than beverages and sweets to total energy intake increased. These adverse 20-year secular trends were most pronounced in boys, with an additional increase in total added sugar intake and decreases in fibre and whole-grain intakes.

During puberty, adolescents increase their self-awareness and are exposed to a changing lifestyle, all of which may affect their eating behaviours(Reference Rolland-Cachera, Bellisle and Deheeger34), e.g. fast food and soft drink consumption increases(Reference St-Onge, Keller and Heymsfield2). In the present study, girls increased their energy intake from added sugar provided by beverages during puberty, corresponding to an increase of 1 % in energy over 5 years. Excess consumption of soft drinks is considered a risk factor influencing body composition(Reference Malik, Willett and Hu35, Reference Vartanian, Schwartz and Brownell36). However, girls concomitantly decreased their energy intake from added sugar provided by sweets, hence compensating for their increase in added sugar from beverages. Therefore, increases in soft drink consumption during puberty may be less important than commonly assumed.

In the present study, relative CHO intakes increased over the 20-year observational period. The concomitant increase in GL was primarily driven by this increase in total CHO and to a lesser extent by an upward secular trend in GI. The present results for adolescents confirm and extend a previous analysis in 7- to 8-year-old DONALD participants, where the GI and GL increased moderately between 1990 and 2002(Reference Buyken, Dettmann and Kersting24).

The present study indicates that CHO quality declined remarkably over the past 20 years. Between 1988 and 2007, absolute fibre intakes decreased considerably in both sexes, corresponding to a 10–15 % decrease over a 10-year time period. This decline was more pronounced in boys who concomitantly decreased their fibre and whole-grain densities by − 0·4 and − 1·4 g/MJ, respectively, in 10 years. Some(Reference Alexy, Kersting and Sichert-Hellert6, Reference Saldanha37), but not all(Reference Cavadini, Siega-Riz and Popkin38, Reference Nicklas, Farris and Myers39), previous trend analyses of CHO intakes in adolescents support a reduction in fibre intake: daily fibre intakes decreased by 1·15 g/d in 12- to 18-year-old US boys between 1977–8 and 1987–8(Reference Saldanha37), and fibre intakes decreased by 0·18 g/d in German girls aged 9–13 years between 1990 and 2004(Reference Alexy, Kersting and Sichert-Hellert6). In view of the numerous recognised health benefits associated with higher intakes of fibre and whole grains(Reference Slavin40), these marked downward secular trends in adolescents are a cause for concern, since they may result in an increased risk for diabetes mellitus, CVD and cancer in adulthood.

In the present study, boys presented with an upward secular trend in added sugar intake, amounting to 3 % more energy intake in 10 years. High consumption of added sugars is thought to be associated with a decrease in micronutrient density in children and teenagers(Reference Joyce and Gibney7). Furthermore, we observed secular upward trends in the consumption of added sugar from sources other than beverages and sweets for both sexes. Further analysis revealed that this category consisted mainly of breakfast cereals and pastries (data not shown).

Interestingly, the adverse secular trends were less pronounced in girls. Females have been suggested to commonly give greater relevance to healthy eating and to make healthier food choices, e.g. they consume more fibre and less fat(Reference Wardle, Haase and Steptoe41). In addition, attention to weight control is more prominent in adolescent girls, and they are more likely to diet or restrain their eating behaviour(Reference Neumark-Sztainer, Story and Resnick42). Furthermore, females are more likely to under-report their dietary intake(Reference Novotny, Rumpler and Riddick43). However, in the present study, neither exclusion of dietary records with potentially under-reported energy levels (3 % of the observations in our girls were under-reported according to age-specific cut-off points(Reference Sichert-Hellert, Kersting and Schoch15)) nor adjustment for the ratio of reported energy intake to estimated BMR appreciably altered the findings. Nevertheless, selective under-reporting of socially undesirable foods such as sweets and soft drinks or selective over-reporting of healthy foods such as fruits and vegetables might have attenuated the secular and pubertal trends in CHO intake, particularly among girls.

The fact that GI values had to be calculated for approximately 35 % of the CHO-containing foods is a limitation of the present study. While this procedure has been controversially discussed(Reference Hollenbeck and Coulston44), several reports suggest that the GI of a whole diet or mixed meal can be accurately estimated from the GI values of its ingredients(Reference Wolever, Yang and Zeng45, Reference Chew, Brand and Thorburn46). Furthermore, whenever no GI or a close match is available for a food, its calculation from the ingredients is the only feasible approach for epidemiological studies. In addition, the high correlation between GL and CHO is in line with the previously expressed concern that GL estimates are largely ‘surrogates’ for CHO intake(Reference van Bakel, Slimani and Feskens47). Theoretically, a validation of GI and GL values could provide further insights in this regard; however, validation of estimates obtained from weighed dietary records would require repeated measurements of postprandial blood glucose levels, an approach which is not feasible particularly in an observational study with children and adolescents.

Given the relatively small study sample, the possibility of chance findings cannot be excluded. The elaborate design of the DONALD Study resulting in a study sample with a relatively high socio-economic status represents a further limitation of the study. While non-representativeness is less relevant for the interpretation of the pubertal trends since each individual acts as his or her own control, it does limit the generalisability of our secular trends. However, the CHO intake of our participants (49–52 % energy) was similar to the values observed in other studies in adolescents(Reference Nicklas, Elkasabany and Srinivasan5, Reference Cavadini, Siega-Riz and Popkin38), and the added sugar intake (13–15 % energy) was in line with the values found in a representative German study(Reference Linseisen, Gedrich and Karg48). The fact that our adolescents consumed more fibre than adolescents in other studies(Reference Nicklas, Elkasabany and Srinivasan5, Reference Cavadini, Siega-Riz and Popkin38) suggests that our secular trends may underestimate the ‘true’ decline in CHO quality over the past 20 years in the general population of European adolescents.

The present study has several strengths, including its comprehensive analysis of various aspects of CHO quality and the use of an innovative statistical approach(Reference Jacobs, Hannan and Wallace32) to simultaneously address independent trends during puberty and over the time. The prospectively collected, repeated and detailed measurements of anthropometric and dietary data for each participant allowed us to align the present analysis to a physiological marker of early puberty so as to reliably estimate individual pubertal trends in CHO quality. A further advantage lies in the constantly updated nutritional database, Lebensmitteltabelle (LEBTAB), which is a prerequisite for a precise evaluation of 20-year secular trends.

In conclusion, the quality of dietary CHO consumed by healthy German adolescents did not change considerably over the course of puberty. However, public health initiatives should be tailored at improving the overall quality of CHO nutrition, which appears to have declined notably over the past 20 years, especially among boys.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff of the Research Institute of Child Nutrition for carrying out the anthropometric measurements and for carrying out the medical examinations. The authors' contributions are as follows: G. C., A. E. B. and L. L. conceived the project, performed the data analyses and drafted the manuscript. N. K.-D., U. A. and T. R. provided critical input on the data analyses and on earlier versions of the manuscript. K. B. provided technical support and statistical expertise. A. E. B. supervised the study. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and revision of the manuscript. The DONALD Study is funded by the Ministry of Science and Research of North Rhine Westphalia, Germany. The present analysis was funded by the International Foundation for the Promotion of Nutrition Research and Nutrition Education. None of the authors has any personal or financial conflicts of interest.

References

1 Lytle, LA, Seifert, S, Greenstein, J, et al. (2000) How do children's eating patterns and food choices change over time? Results from a cohort study. Am J Health Promot 14, 222228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 St-Onge, MP, Keller, KL & Heymsfield, SB (2003) Changes in childhood food consumption patterns: a cause for concern in light of increasing body weights. Am J Clin Nutr 78, 10681073.Google Scholar
3 French, SA, Story, M, Neumark-Sztainer, D, et al. (2001) Fast food restaurant use among adolescents: associations with nutrient intake, food choices and behavioral and psychosocial variables. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25, 18231833.Google Scholar
4 Alexy, U, Sichert-Hellert, W & Kersting, M (2002) Fifteen-year time trends in energy and macronutrient intake in German children and adolescents: results of the DONALD study. Br J Nutr 87, 595604.Google Scholar
5 Nicklas, TA, Elkasabany, A, Srinivasan, SR, et al. (2001) Trends in nutrient intake of 10-year-old children over two decades (1973–1994): the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol 153, 969977.Google Scholar
6 Alexy, U, Kersting, M & Sichert-Hellert, W (2006) Evaluation of dietary fibre intake from infancy to adolescence against various references – results of the DONALD study. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 909914.Google Scholar
7 Joyce, T & Gibney, MJ (2008) The impact of added sugar consumption on overall dietary quality in Irish children and teenagers. J Hum Nutr Diet 21, 438450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Dietz, WH (1994) Critical periods in childhood for the development of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 59, 955959.Google Scholar
9 Kroke, A, Manz, F, Kersting, M, et al. (2004) The DONALD study: history, current status and future perspectives. Eur J Nutr 43, 4554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Euling, SY, Herman-Giddens, ME, Lee, PA, et al. (2008) Examination of US puberty-timing data from 1940 to 1994 for secular trends: panel findings. Pediatrics 121, Suppl. 3, S172S191.Google Scholar
11 Mirwald, RL, Baxter-Jones, AD, Bailey, DA, et al. (2002) An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34, 689694.Google Scholar
12 Silventoinen, K, Haukka, J, Dunkel, L, et al. (2008) Genetics of pubertal timing and its associations with relative weight in childhood and adult height: the Swedish Young Male Twins Study. Pediatrics 121, e885e891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Sandhu, J, Ben-Shlomo, Y, Cole, TJ, et al. (2006) The impact of childhood body mass index on timing of puberty, adult stature and obesity: a follow-up study based on adolescent anthropometry recorded at Christ's Hospital (1936–1964). Int J Obes (Lond) 30, 1422.Google Scholar
14 He, Q & Karlberg, J (2001) Bmi in childhood and its association with height gain, timing of puberty, and final height. Pediatr Res 49, 244251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Sichert-Hellert, W, Kersting, M & Schoch, G (1998) Underreporting of energy intake in 1 to 18 year old German children and adolescents. Z Ernahrungswiss 37, 242251.Google Scholar
16 Lohman, TG, Roche, AF & Martorell, R (1988) Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.Google Scholar
17 Preece, MA & Baines, MJ (1978) A new family of mathematical models describing the human growth curve. Ann Hum Biol 5, 124.Google Scholar
18 Buyken, AE, Karaolis-Danckert, N & Remer, T (2009) Association of prepubertal body composition in healthy girls and boys with the timing of early and late pubertal markers. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 221230.Google Scholar
19 Berkey, CS, Dockery, DW, Wang, X, et al. (1993) Longitudinal height velocity standards for U.S. adolescents. Stat Med 12, 403414.Google Scholar
20 Demerath, EW, Li, J, Sun, SS, et al. (2004) Fifty-year trends in serial body mass index during adolescence in girls: the Fels Longitudinal Study. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 441446.Google Scholar
21 Aksglaede, L, Olsen, LW, Sorensen, TI, et al. (2008) Forty years trends in timing of pubertal growth spurt in 157,000 Danish school children. PLoS One 3, e2728.Google Scholar
22 Human Nutrition Unit, School of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences and University of Sydney (2007) www.glycemicindex.com (accessed 25 September 2007).Google Scholar
23 Sichert-Hellert, W, Kersting, M, Chahda, C, et al. (2007) German food composition database for dietary evaluations in children and adolescents. J Food Compost Anal 20, 6370.Google Scholar
24 Buyken, AE, Dettmann, W, Kersting, M, et al. (2005) Glycaemic index and glycaemic load in the diet of healthy schoolchildren: trends from 1990 to 2002, contribution of different carbohydrate sources and relations to dietary quality. Br J Nutr 94, 796803.Google Scholar
25 Cheng, G, Karaolis-Danckert, N, Libuda, L, et al. (2009) Relation of dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, and fiber and whole-grain intakes during puberty to the concurrent development of percent body fat and body mass index. Am J Epidemiol 169, 667677.Google Scholar
26 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture (2005) www.healthierus.gov/dietaryguidelines (accessed 17 March 2010).Google Scholar
27 Buyken, AE, Cheng, G, Gunther, AL, et al. (2008) Relation of dietary glycemic index, glycemic load, added sugar intake, or fiber intake to the development of body composition between ages 2 and 7 y. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 755762.Google Scholar
28 Lytle, LA & Kubik, MY (2003) Nutritional issues for adolescents. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 17, 177189.Google Scholar
29 Ludwig, DS, Peterson, KE & Gortmaker, SL (2001) Relation between consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks and childhood obesity: a prospective, observational analysis. Lancet 357, 505508.Google Scholar
30 Bingham, SA, Cassidy, A, Cole, TJ, et al. (1995) Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers. Br J Nutr 73, 531550.Google Scholar
31 Bokhof, B, Gunther, AL, Berg-Beckhoff, G, et al. (2010) Validation of protein intake assessed from weighed dietary records against protein estimated from 24 h urine samples in children, adolescents and young adults participating in the Dortmund Nutritional and Longitudinally Designed (DONALD) Study. Public Health Nutr 13, 826834.Google Scholar
32 Jacobs, DR Jr, Hannan, PJ, Wallace, D, et al. (1999) Interpreting age, period and cohort effects in plasma lipids and serum insulin using repeated measures regression analysis: the CARDIA Study. Stat Med 18, 655679.Google Scholar
33 Hulshof, KF, Brussaard, JH, Kruizinga, AG, et al. (2003) Socio-economic status, dietary intake and 10 y trends: the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 128137.Google Scholar
34 Rolland-Cachera, MF, Bellisle, F & Deheeger, M (2000) Nutritional status and food intake in adolescents living in Western Europe. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, Suppl. 1, S41S46.Google Scholar
35 Malik, VS, Willett, WC & Hu, FB (2009) Sugar-sweetened beverages and BMI in children and adolescents: reanalyses of a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 438439, author reply 439–440.Google Scholar
36 Vartanian, LR, Schwartz, MB & Brownell, KD (2007) Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 97, 667675.Google Scholar
37 Saldanha, LG (1995) Fiber in the diet of US children: results of national surveys. Pediatrics 96, 994997.Google Scholar
38 Cavadini, C, Siega-Riz, AM & Popkin, BM (2000) US adolescent food intake trends from 1965 to 1996. Arch Dis Child 83, 1824.Google Scholar
39 Nicklas, TA, Farris, RP, Myers, L, et al. (1995) Dietary fiber intake of children and young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Am Diet Assoc 95, 209214.Google Scholar
40 Slavin, JL (2008) Position of the American Dietetic Association: health implications of dietary fiber. J Am Diet Assoc 108, 17161731.Google Scholar
41 Wardle, J, Haase, AM, Steptoe, A, et al. (2004) Gender differences in food choice: the contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Ann Behav Med 27, 107116.Google Scholar
42 Neumark-Sztainer, D, Story, M, Resnick, MD, et al. (1998) Lessons learned about adolescent nutrition from the Minnesota Adolescent Health Survey. J Am Diet Assoc 98, 14491456.Google Scholar
43 Novotny, JA, Rumpler, WV, Riddick, H, et al. (2003) Personality characteristics as predictors of underreporting of energy intake on 24-hour dietary recall interviews. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 11461151.Google Scholar
44 Hollenbeck, CB & Coulston, AM (1991) The clinical utility of the glycemic index and its application to mixed meals. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 69, 100107.Google Scholar
45 Wolever, TM, Yang, M, Zeng, XY, et al. (2006) Food glycemic index, as given in glycemic index tables, is a significant determinant of glycemic responses elicited by composite breakfast meals. Am J Clin Nutr 83, 13061312.Google Scholar
46 Chew, I, Brand, JC, Thorburn, AW, et al. (1988) Application of glycemic index to mixed meals. Am J Clin Nutr 47, 5356.Google Scholar
47 van Bakel, MM, Slimani, N, Feskens, EJ, et al. (2009) Methodological challenges in the application of the glycemic index in epidemiological studies using data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. J Nutr 139, 568575.Google Scholar
48 Linseisen, J, Gedrich, K, Karg, G, et al. (1998) Sucrose intake in Germany. Z Ernahrungswiss 37, 303314.Google Scholar
49 Slaughter, MH, Lohman, TG, Boileau, RA, et al. (1988) Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth. Hum Biol 60, 709723.Google Scholar
50 Cole, TJ, Bellizzi, MC, Flegal, KM, et al. (2000) Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 320, 12401243.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Characteristics* at age at take-off (ATO) for 100 boys and 116 girls from the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study by calendar year strata(Mean values and standard deviations, medians (first quartile (Q1) and third quartile (Q3)) or frequencies and percentages)

Figure 1

Table 2 Dietary characteristics* of boys (n 100, in total 486 dietary records) from the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study sample during the study period(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 2

Table 3 Dietary characteristics* of girls (n 116, in total 567 dietary records) from the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study sample during the study period(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 3

Table 4 Pubertal and secular trends* (per year) in carbohydrate quality (absolute intake) in 216 participants from the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study analysed by repeated-measures regression analysis(β coefficients with their standard errors)

Figure 4

Table 5 Pubertal and secular trends* (per year) in carbohydrate quality (relative intake) in 216 participants from the Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed Study analysed by repeated-measures regression analysis(β coefficients with their standard errors)