Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:46:38.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interdisciplinary benefits of a theory of cultural evolution centered at the group-level: The emergence of macro-neuroeconomics and social evolutionary game theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Tobias A. Mattei
Tobias A. Mattei*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurological Surgery at Ohio State University, Coordinator of the Interdisciplinary Group for Research in Neuroeconomics, Cognition and Neuroscience, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The theoretical concepts developed in the target article, in which the author proposes a new paradigm of cultural evolution based not on the individuals' characteristics, but rather on more global collective properties described as “group-traits” (which emerge when a group of individuals exhibit both differentiation and organization), may have a broader scientific impact that transcend the boundaries of social and evolutionary psychology, paving the way for the emergence of macro-neuroeconomics and social evolutionary game theory.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 264 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Colman, A. M. (2003) Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Science 26:139–53.Google Scholar
Fisher, C. E., Chin, L. & Klitzman, R. (2010) Defining neuromarketing: Practices and professional challenges. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 18:230–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopher, D., Itkin-Webman, T., Erev, I., Meyer, J. & Armony, L. (2000) The effect of shared responsibility and competition in perceptual games: A test of a cognitive game-theoretic extension of signal-detection theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26:325–41.Google Scholar
Greenberger, D., Reiter, W. L. & Zeilinger, A. (1999) Epistemological and experimental perspectives on quantum physics: Vienna circle institute yearbook. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Güroğlu, B., van den Bos, W. & Crone, E. A. (2009) Neural correlates of social decision making and relationships: A developmental perspective. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1167:197–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofbauer, J. & Sigmund, K (1998) Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kalenscher, T., Tobler, P. N., Huijbers, W., Daselaar, S. M. & Pennartz, C. M. (2010) Neural signatures of intransitive preferences. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9:49.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G., Rick, S. & Cohen, J. (2008) Neuroeconomics. Annual Review of Psychology 59:647–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Wier, L. M., David, S. P., Ray, L. A., Bickel, W. K. & Sweet, L. H. (2012) The neuroeconomics of nicotine dependence: A preliminary functional magnetic resonance imaging study of delay discounting of monetary and cigarette rewards in smokers. Psychiatry Research 202:20–29.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1982) Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeks, T. W. & Jeste, D. V. (2009) Neurobiology of wisdom: A literature overview. Archives of General Psychiatry 66:355–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meynen, G. (2013) A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: Decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 36:93–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mojzisch, A. & Krug, K. (2008) Cells, circuits, and choices: Social influences on perceptual decision making. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 8:498–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreira, J. A., Pacheco, J. M. & Santos, F. C. (2013) Evolution of collective action in adaptive social structures. Science Reports 3:1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanfey, A. G. (2007) Social decision-making: Insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science 318:598–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxe, R. & Kanwisher, N. (2003) People thinking about thinking people: The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind.” NeuroImage 19:1835–42.Google Scholar
Spector, M. (1972) Methodological foundations of relativistic mechanics. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1946) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zeeman, E. C. (1980) Population dynamics from game theory. Global Theory of Dynamical Systems/Lecture Notes in Mathematics 819:471–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar