Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:48:58.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Degree of habitual mastication may be a possible cause of inter-individual variation in in vivo glycaemic response to whole cereals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2010

D. V. Ranawana
Affiliation:
Functional Food Centre, School of Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy lane, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK
C. J. K. Henry
Affiliation:
Functional Food Centre, School of Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gipsy lane, Headington, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

The degree of habitual mastication varies significantly between individuals(Reference Jiffry1), and this may be one of the causes for the considerable inter-individual variation observed in the blood glucose response (GR) to foods(Reference Wolever2). Previous work from our group showed that the degree of particle breakdown during mastication affects in vitro glycemic potency(Reference Ranawana, Monro and Mishra3). We therefore hypothesized that the degree of habitual mastication will influence individuals' in vivo GR to carbohydrate foods. Eleven participants came in on six non-consecutive days to the laboratory and evaluated two test foods (rice and spaghetti). They were given portions containing 50 g of available carbohydrates of each test food on 3 d. Their GR was measured for the subsequent 120 min using capillary blood samples. On two random days for each test food, the number of mouthfuls taken to finish the food portion, the number of chews per mouthful and the time taken to chew each mouthful was measured using surface electrode electromyography (EMG). At the end of the same test sessions, the participants were given 100 g of the same test food, which they masticated to the point of swallowing and expectorated into plastic containers. The particle size distribution (>2000 μm, 1000–2000 μm, 500–1000 μm and <500 μm) of this masticated food was determined on a percentage dry weight basis. GR was expressed as the incremental area under the curve for the blood glucose response (IAUC). Correlations were statistically analysed with the linear regression procedure and inter-individual variations and comparisons, using the one-way ANOVA and t-test procedures, respectively. Statistical significance (α) was set at P<0.05.

The mean number of chews per mouthful for each individual did not significantly differ for rice and spaghetti (P=0.227), although participants took a significantly lower total number of mouthfuls to consume the spaghetti (P=0.002). The number of mouthfuls, chews per mouthful and the chewing time per mouthful correlated significantly within each test food. Significant correlations between the degree of mastication and the GR were observed for rice, but not spaghetti. The percentages of particles >2000 μm and <500 μm in masticated rice correlated significantly with the GR at 45 min (P=0.002 and P=0.014), which was also the time at which the mean peak GR for rice was observed. The percentages of particles >2000 μm and <500 μm in rice also correlated significantly with the IAUC for the first 45 and 60 min post-consumption. None of these correlations were observed at a significant level with spaghetti.

These findings indicate that the degree of mastication influences the peak and total in vivo GR of rice. In unprocessed foods with intact grains, the extent of mechanical breakdown during mastication may determine the accessibility of the digestive enzymes to starch and thus influence its GR. Mastication may not be as important in starchy foods such as spaghetti where the grain structure has undergone considerable disintegration during processing. The results suggest that individual differences in mastication may be one cause for inter-individual differences in the GR to grainy foods such as rice.

References

1.Jiffry, MTM (1981) Analysis of particles produced at the end of mastication in subjects with normal dentition. J Oral Rehab 8, 113119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Wolever, TMS (2006) The Glycaemic Index: A Physiological Classification of Dietary Carbohydrate. Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ranawana, DV, Monro, JM, Mishra, S et al. (2010) Degree of particle size breakdown during mastication may be a possible cause of inter-individual glycemic variability. Nutr Res 30, 246254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar