Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:54:52.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feedback, group-level processes, and systems approaches in human evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2014

Agustin Fuentes
Agustin Fuentes*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556. [email protected]://anthropology.nd.edu/faculty-staff/fuentes_agustin/index.shtml
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An explicit role for emergent group-level traits, social role diversification, and coordination makes good sense when thinking about human evolution. To most effectively understand these and other facets, we need to move toward an integrative model that assumes niche construction and encompasses positive feedback systems at individual, subgroup and larger group levels, demographic processes, and local ecologies.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , June 2014 , pp. 259 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anton, S. C. & Snodgrass, J. (2012) Origin and evolution of genus Homo . New Perspectives Current Anthropology 53(6):479–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, P. & Gluckman, P. (2011) Plasticity, robustness, development and evolution. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R., Gamble, C. & Gowlett, J. (2010) Social brain, distributed mind. In: Proceedings of the British Academy 158:3–15. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, E.G., Laland, K. N., Kendal, R. L. & Kendal, J. R. (2013) Developmental niche construction. Developmental Science 16(2):296–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuentes, A. (2013) Cooperation, conflict, and niche construction in the genus homo. In: War, peace, and human nature, ed. Fry, D., pp. 78–94. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, A. (in press) Human evolution, niche complexity, and the emergence of a distinctively human imagination. Time and Mind 7(3)Google Scholar
Gamble, C., Gowlett, J. & Dunbar, R. (2011) The social brain and the shape of the Paleolithic. Cambridge Archeological Journal 21(1):115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J. (2011) A cultural species: How culture drove human evolution. Psychological Science Agenda 25(11). http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2011/11/human-evolution.aspx Google Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1976a) Interactions, relationships and social structure. McGraw-Hill Book Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kendal, J. (2012) Cultural niche construction and human learning environments: Investigating sociocultural perspectives. Biological Theory 6(3):241–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J. & Feldman, M. W. (2000) Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:131–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malone, N. M., Fuentes, A. & White, F. J. (2012) Variation in the social systems of extant hominoids: Comparative insight into the social behaviour of early hominins. International Journal of Primatology 33(6):1251–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E. & Gray, R. (2003) Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. (2005) Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. (2012) The evolved apprentice: How evolution made humans unique. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A. & Erdal, D. (2012) The human socio-cognitive niche and its evolutionary origins. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367:2119–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed