The author would like to make the below corrections to his article. The author apologises for these mistakes.

Page 25, Results

In this research the Internet addicts group was defined as those who had scored higher than 111, the at risk group was defined as those who had scored between 69 and 110, and the typical users group was below 69 on the Internet Use and Addiction questionnaire. In the scale of Pratarelli and Browne (2002) the limits are determined by the researcher. Results showed that 420 (49.4%) were typical users, 375 of them (44.1%) were at risk of becoming Internet addicts and 56 (6.6%) were Internet addicts.

Page 26, first paragraph

Females (76.43%) used the Internet to find resources more than males (57.37%), χ2(2) = 35.54, p = .00 < .05.

Page 28, missing references

Armstrong, L., Phillips, J. G., & Saling, L. L. (2000). Potential determinants of heavier Internet usage. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 537–550.

Beak, S. (2005). Exploring customer preferences for online games. International Journal of Advances Media and Communication, 1(1), 26–40.

Beard, K. W. (2005). Internet addiction: a review of current assessment techniques and potential assessment questions. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 8, 7–14.

Greenfield, D. (2000). ABC News Chat with Dr. Dave Greenfield. Retrived May 27, 2010, from: http://www.virtual-addiction.com/pages/a_abcnews_chat.htm

Siomos, K.E, Dafouli, E.D., Braimiotis, D.A., Mouzas, O.D. & Angelopoulos N.V. (2008). Internet addiction among Greek adolescent students.CyberPsychology and Behavior, 11(6), 653–657.

Yavaş, İ. (2008). İnternet bağımlılığı eroinden beter. Retrived May 23, 2010, from: http://ismailyavas.blogspot.com/2008_02_01_archive.html